James Field, Sibylle Vital, Denis Murphy, Jonathan Dixon, Julia Davies, Argyro Kavadella, Mohammed Al-Haroni, Paul Brady, Blanaid Daly, Michael Dolan, Filip Galo, Cedric Grolleau, Dympnah Kavanagh, Albert Leung, Paul Lyons, Maria-Cristina Manzanares, Upen Patel, Gitana Rederiene, Miguel Pavão, Maria João Ponces, Barry Quinn, Nibal Sabri, Ross Scales, Ina Schüler, Saulė Skinkytė, Stephanie Tubert-Jeannin, Katleen Vandamme, Brian O'Connell
In 2025 the Association for Dental Education in Europe (ADEE) Graduating European Dentist (GED) taskforce held an international multi-stakeholder event that undertook a deep-dive into the perceived ideologies underpinning Oral Health Professional (OHP) education. This paper reports how the event was planned and conducted—and reports the challenges that were discussed in relation to delivering OHP education, potential solutions to each challenge, and priorities for which the ADEE GED taskforce should focus its activity. Due to the very collaborative and fruitful nature of this event, ADEE plans to hold further multi-stakeholder meetings across Europe.
{"title":"The Graduating European Dentist Curriculum Framework: A Multi-Stakeholder View","authors":"James Field, Sibylle Vital, Denis Murphy, Jonathan Dixon, Julia Davies, Argyro Kavadella, Mohammed Al-Haroni, Paul Brady, Blanaid Daly, Michael Dolan, Filip Galo, Cedric Grolleau, Dympnah Kavanagh, Albert Leung, Paul Lyons, Maria-Cristina Manzanares, Upen Patel, Gitana Rederiene, Miguel Pavão, Maria João Ponces, Barry Quinn, Nibal Sabri, Ross Scales, Ina Schüler, Saulė Skinkytė, Stephanie Tubert-Jeannin, Katleen Vandamme, Brian O'Connell","doi":"10.1111/eje.70028","DOIUrl":"10.1111/eje.70028","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In 2025 the Association for Dental Education in Europe (ADEE) Graduating European Dentist (GED) taskforce held an international multi-stakeholder event that undertook a deep-dive into the perceived ideologies underpinning Oral Health Professional (OHP) education. This paper reports how the event was planned and conducted—and reports the challenges that were discussed in relation to delivering OHP education, potential solutions to each challenge, and priorities for which the ADEE GED taskforce should focus its activity. Due to the very collaborative and fruitful nature of this event, ADEE plans to hold further multi-stakeholder meetings across Europe.</p>","PeriodicalId":50488,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dental Education","volume":"29 4","pages":"691-702"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eje.70028","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144856932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives: To evaluate the importance of generic skills in clinical dental practice and how well these skills were achieved during undergraduate dental education.
Materials and methods: The data were based on a national online questionnaire survey called 'Young Dentist', which was hosted by the Finnish Dental Association. The questionnaire was sent via an email link in May 2021 to dentists who had graduated in Finland during 2018-2020. Altogether 221/505 recently graduated dentists (response rate 44%) answered the questionnaire. At the same time, the questionnaire was also sent to more experienced colleagues, who were selected by random sampling from the member register of the Finnish Dental Association (response rate 82/778, 14%).
Results: Recently graduated dentists stated that patient encounter skills were the most important generic skill in clinical dental practice, and this skill was well achieved during undergraduate studies. Other important skills in clinical dental practice reported by young dentists were aseptic techniques and patient safety and risk management skills, which were also well or very well achieved during undergraduate studies. The opinions of recently graduated dentists and more experienced colleagues were quite similar.
Conclusion: According to the opinions of the dentists, undergraduate dental education develops most generic competencies in clinical dental practice, but evolving practices, advancing technologies and health system challenges highlight the growing importance of diverse generic skills in the dental profession.
{"title":"Do Generic Skills Achieved During Undergraduate Dental Education Meet the Need in Clinical Practice?","authors":"Ritva Näpänkangas, Olli-Pekka Lappalainen, Hannaleena Jämsä, Marja-Liisa Laitala, Jaakko Koivumäki, Terhi Karaharju-Suvanto","doi":"10.1111/eje.70037","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.70037","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the importance of generic skills in clinical dental practice and how well these skills were achieved during undergraduate dental education.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The data were based on a national online questionnaire survey called 'Young Dentist', which was hosted by the Finnish Dental Association. The questionnaire was sent via an email link in May 2021 to dentists who had graduated in Finland during 2018-2020. Altogether 221/505 recently graduated dentists (response rate 44%) answered the questionnaire. At the same time, the questionnaire was also sent to more experienced colleagues, who were selected by random sampling from the member register of the Finnish Dental Association (response rate 82/778, 14%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recently graduated dentists stated that patient encounter skills were the most important generic skill in clinical dental practice, and this skill was well achieved during undergraduate studies. Other important skills in clinical dental practice reported by young dentists were aseptic techniques and patient safety and risk management skills, which were also well or very well achieved during undergraduate studies. The opinions of recently graduated dentists and more experienced colleagues were quite similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to the opinions of the dentists, undergraduate dental education develops most generic competencies in clinical dental practice, but evolving practices, advancing technologies and health system challenges highlight the growing importance of diverse generic skills in the dental profession.</p>","PeriodicalId":50488,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dental Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144849497","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cristina Gómez Polo, Javier Montero, María Portillo Muñoz, María Lobato, Beatriz Pardal, Álvaro Zubizarreta, Ana María Martín Casado
Objectives: This descriptive and correlational study investigates the learning styles (LS) and emotional intelligence (EI) of students enrolled in medicine, dentistry, and pharmacy degree programmes. The study examines gender and programme-related differences and analyses the correlation between LS and EI.
Materials and methods: A total of 247 students (57 men and 190 women) participated, completing the Honey-Alonso Learning Styles and the Trait Meta-Mood Scale (TMMS-24) questionnaires to assess perceived EI. Data were collected via the Qualtrics XM platform from January to September 2023.
Results: Results indicated significant differences among the four learning styles (F(3, 738) = 66.511, p < 0.001), with the highest scores in the reflector and theorist styles, and no gender differences observed. Across all three degree programmes, the highest scores were also found in the reflector and theorist styles, though significant differences were noted in reflector-style scores among the programmes (F(2, 244) = 3.097, p = 0.047): dentistry students scored the lowest (M = 7.97) compared to medicine (M = 9.50) and pharmacy (M = 9.09). All four learning styles showed positive and significant correlations with emotional clarity (r ranging from 0.145 to 0.182); students with a better understanding of their emotional states scored higher in all learning styles. Additionally, the activist style was positively correlated with emotional repair (r = 0.136).
Conclusions: Reflector and theorist styles were predominant among the students, with no gender differences. The association between LS and the emotional clarity component of EI may inform the design of teaching methodologies; though further exploration is required due to the study's sample limitations. Tailored educational programmes focusing on LS and EI could enhance skill acquisition.
{"title":"Learning Styles and Emotional Intelligence in University Students Studying Dentistry, Medicine and Pharmacy.","authors":"Cristina Gómez Polo, Javier Montero, María Portillo Muñoz, María Lobato, Beatriz Pardal, Álvaro Zubizarreta, Ana María Martín Casado","doi":"10.1111/eje.70033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.70033","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This descriptive and correlational study investigates the learning styles (LS) and emotional intelligence (EI) of students enrolled in medicine, dentistry, and pharmacy degree programmes. The study examines gender and programme-related differences and analyses the correlation between LS and EI.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 247 students (57 men and 190 women) participated, completing the Honey-Alonso Learning Styles and the Trait Meta-Mood Scale (TMMS-24) questionnaires to assess perceived EI. Data were collected via the Qualtrics XM platform from January to September 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicated significant differences among the four learning styles (F(3, 738) = 66.511, p < 0.001), with the highest scores in the reflector and theorist styles, and no gender differences observed. Across all three degree programmes, the highest scores were also found in the reflector and theorist styles, though significant differences were noted in reflector-style scores among the programmes (F(2, 244) = 3.097, p = 0.047): dentistry students scored the lowest (M = 7.97) compared to medicine (M = 9.50) and pharmacy (M = 9.09). All four learning styles showed positive and significant correlations with emotional clarity (r ranging from 0.145 to 0.182); students with a better understanding of their emotional states scored higher in all learning styles. Additionally, the activist style was positively correlated with emotional repair (r = 0.136).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reflector and theorist styles were predominant among the students, with no gender differences. The association between LS and the emotional clarity component of EI may inform the design of teaching methodologies; though further exploration is required due to the study's sample limitations. Tailored educational programmes focusing on LS and EI could enhance skill acquisition.</p>","PeriodicalId":50488,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dental Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144849499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nezaket Ezgi Özer, Yusuf Balcı, Gaye Bölükbaşı, Betul İlhan, Pelin Güneri
Aim: To compare the item difficulty and discriminative index of multiple-choice questions (MCQs) generated by ChatGPT with those created by dental educators, based on the performance of dental students in a real exam setting.
Materials and methods: A total of 40 MCQs-20 generated by ChatGPT 4.0 and 20 by dental educators-were developed based on the Oral Diagnosis and Radiology course content. An independent, blinded panel of three educators assessed all MCQs for accuracy, relevance and clarity. Fifth-year dental students participated in an onsite and online exam featuring these questions. Item difficulty and discriminative indices were calculated using classical test theory and point-biserial correlation. Statistical analysis was conducted with the Shapiro-Wilk test, paired sample t-test and independent t-test, with significance set at p < 0.05.
Results: Educators created 20 valid MCQs in 2.5 h, with minor revisions needed for three questions. ChatGPT generated 36 MCQs in 30 min; 20 were accepted, while 44% were excluded due to poor distractors, repetition, bias, or factual errors. Eighty fifth-year dental students completed the exam. The mean difficulty index was 0.41 ± 0.19 for educator-generated questions and 0.42 ± 0.15 for ChatGPT-generated questions, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.773). Similarly, the mean discriminative index was 0.30 ± 0.16 for educator-generated questions and 0.32 ± 0.16 for ChatGPT-generated questions, also showing no significant difference (p = 0.578). Notably, 60% (n = 12) of ChatGPT-generated and 50% (n = 10) of educator-generated questions met the criteria for 'good quality', demonstrating balanced difficulty and strong discriminative performance.
Conclusion: ChatGPT-generated MCQs performed comparably to educator-created questions in terms of difficulty and discriminative power, highlighting their potential to support assessment design. However, it is important to note that a substantial portion of the initial ChatGPT-generated MCQs were excluded by the independent panel due to issues related to clarity, accuracy, or distractor quality. To avoid overreliance, particularly among faculty who may lack experience in question development or awareness of AI limitations, expert review is essential before use. Future studies should investigate AI's ability to generate complex question formats and its long-term impact on learning.
{"title":"Examining the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Assessment: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT and Educator-Generated Multiple-Choice Questions in a Dental Exam.","authors":"Nezaket Ezgi Özer, Yusuf Balcı, Gaye Bölükbaşı, Betul İlhan, Pelin Güneri","doi":"10.1111/eje.70034","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.70034","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the item difficulty and discriminative index of multiple-choice questions (MCQs) generated by ChatGPT with those created by dental educators, based on the performance of dental students in a real exam setting.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 40 MCQs-20 generated by ChatGPT 4.0 and 20 by dental educators-were developed based on the Oral Diagnosis and Radiology course content. An independent, blinded panel of three educators assessed all MCQs for accuracy, relevance and clarity. Fifth-year dental students participated in an onsite and online exam featuring these questions. Item difficulty and discriminative indices were calculated using classical test theory and point-biserial correlation. Statistical analysis was conducted with the Shapiro-Wilk test, paired sample t-test and independent t-test, with significance set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Educators created 20 valid MCQs in 2.5 h, with minor revisions needed for three questions. ChatGPT generated 36 MCQs in 30 min; 20 were accepted, while 44% were excluded due to poor distractors, repetition, bias, or factual errors. Eighty fifth-year dental students completed the exam. The mean difficulty index was 0.41 ± 0.19 for educator-generated questions and 0.42 ± 0.15 for ChatGPT-generated questions, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.773). Similarly, the mean discriminative index was 0.30 ± 0.16 for educator-generated questions and 0.32 ± 0.16 for ChatGPT-generated questions, also showing no significant difference (p = 0.578). Notably, 60% (n = 12) of ChatGPT-generated and 50% (n = 10) of educator-generated questions met the criteria for 'good quality', demonstrating balanced difficulty and strong discriminative performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ChatGPT-generated MCQs performed comparably to educator-created questions in terms of difficulty and discriminative power, highlighting their potential to support assessment design. However, it is important to note that a substantial portion of the initial ChatGPT-generated MCQs were excluded by the independent panel due to issues related to clarity, accuracy, or distractor quality. To avoid overreliance, particularly among faculty who may lack experience in question development or awareness of AI limitations, expert review is essential before use. Future studies should investigate AI's ability to generate complex question formats and its long-term impact on learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":50488,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dental Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144818104","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: With the improvement of living standards and increasing aesthetic demands, the need for highly skilled orthodontic professionals is on the rise. China is continuously improving its medical education models to cultivate excellent orthodontic physicians. This study systematically reviews the current status of orthodontic medical education and physician training models in China, America and European countries, reveals core differences through multidimensional comparisons and proposes optimised pathways for reform in China while exploring goals and directions for deepening educational innovation.
Materials and methods: This paper searched databases such as PubMed, Web of Science and the official websites of representative dental schools in various countries. The article summarises and compares the orthodontic education models in China and other countries, from the aspects of educational systems, degree conferment, curriculum design and clinical practice and so on.
Results: At present, the training of orthodontic specialists in China is mainly after undergraduate education. There are many similarities between China and the United States and Europe in terms of orthodontics. The educational system can be roughly divided into the basic oral medicine and the orthodontic professional education stage. However, there are differences in the specific study period and the curriculum arrangement of each stage.
Conclusions: The education model system for Chinese orthodontic specialists has advantages such as systematisation, standardisation and interdisciplinary joint training. However, compared to America and European countries, there is still a gap, with problems such as a lack of general education and medical humanities courses, insufficient scientific research training and so on. We propose possible solutions to address the existing shortcomings and further improve the clinical and scientific research level of Chinese orthodontists.
导读:随着人们生活水平的提高和审美需求的增加,对高技能正畸专业人员的需求正在上升。中国正在不断完善医学教育模式,培养优秀的正畸医师。本研究系统回顾了中美欧三国正畸医学教育和医师培养模式的现状,通过多维度比较揭示出核心差异,并提出中国改革的优化路径,探索深化教育创新的目标和方向。材料与方法:检索PubMed、Web of Science等数据库及各国代表性牙科院校官方网站。本文从教育体制、学位授予、课程设计和临床实践等方面,对国内外正畸教育模式进行了总结和比较。结果:目前国内正畸专科人才培养以本科教育为主。在正畸方面,中国与美国和欧洲有许多相似之处。教育体系大致可分为口腔基础医学和正畸专业教育阶段。但是,在具体的学习时间和每个阶段的课程安排上都存在差异。结论:我国正畸专科医师培养模式体系具有系统化、规范化、跨学科联合培养等优势。但与欧美国家相比,仍有差距,存在通识教育和医学人文课程缺失、科研培训不足等问题。针对目前存在的不足,提出可能的解决方案,进一步提高我国正畸医师的临床和科研水平。
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of Orthodontic Medical Education and Physician Training Models: China Versus America and European Countries.","authors":"Yuchen Li, Si Chen, Bing Han","doi":"10.1111/eje.70040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.70040","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With the improvement of living standards and increasing aesthetic demands, the need for highly skilled orthodontic professionals is on the rise. China is continuously improving its medical education models to cultivate excellent orthodontic physicians. This study systematically reviews the current status of orthodontic medical education and physician training models in China, America and European countries, reveals core differences through multidimensional comparisons and proposes optimised pathways for reform in China while exploring goals and directions for deepening educational innovation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This paper searched databases such as PubMed, Web of Science and the official websites of representative dental schools in various countries. The article summarises and compares the orthodontic education models in China and other countries, from the aspects of educational systems, degree conferment, curriculum design and clinical practice and so on.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At present, the training of orthodontic specialists in China is mainly after undergraduate education. There are many similarities between China and the United States and Europe in terms of orthodontics. The educational system can be roughly divided into the basic oral medicine and the orthodontic professional education stage. However, there are differences in the specific study period and the curriculum arrangement of each stage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The education model system for Chinese orthodontic specialists has advantages such as systematisation, standardisation and interdisciplinary joint training. However, compared to America and European countries, there is still a gap, with problems such as a lack of general education and medical humanities courses, insufficient scientific research training and so on. We propose possible solutions to address the existing shortcomings and further improve the clinical and scientific research level of Chinese orthodontists.</p>","PeriodicalId":50488,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dental Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144818103","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate access cavity preparation quality, procedure time, and working posture of general dentistry residents using different types of magnification (naked eye, traditional loupe and deflection loupe).
Methods: This in vitro study used a randomised cross-over design. Thirty general dentistry residents performed access cavity preparations using naked eye, traditional loupe, and deflection loupe on plastic right maxillary first molars in manikins. The working posture was evaluated using the Posture Assessment Instrument (PAI). The access cavity preparation quality scores, procedure time, and PAI scores were compared between groups. Questionnaire results on residents' perceptions were also analysed.
Results: The access cavity preparation scores were higher for both loupe groups than the naked eye group. Procedure time was not different between groups. Both PAI_total and PAI_neck scores were statistically lower in the deflection loupe group and traditional loupe group than in the naked eye group. The deflection loupe group had lower PAI_neck scores than the traditional loupe group. Both traditional loupe and deflection loupe were rated positively in terms of precision, ergonomics, treatment quality, and adaptability. The deflection loupe was considered superior in ergonomics but less comfortable. Eye fatigue is a common problem for both types of loupes.
Conclusion: Both deflection loupe and traditional loupe can improve working posture and access cavity preparation quality. Deflection loupe had an ergonomic advantage over traditional loupe. The comfort of deflection loupe needed improvement because of its heavy weight. Another perceived problem of deflection loupe and traditional loupe was eye fatigue.
{"title":"Implementing Deflection Loupes in Endodontic Training of General Dentistry Residents: Effects on Treatment Quality, Procedure Time and Ergonomics.","authors":"Kexian Xie, Yuangao Li, Ning Ma, Xiao Wang","doi":"10.1111/eje.70030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.70030","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate access cavity preparation quality, procedure time, and working posture of general dentistry residents using different types of magnification (naked eye, traditional loupe and deflection loupe).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This in vitro study used a randomised cross-over design. Thirty general dentistry residents performed access cavity preparations using naked eye, traditional loupe, and deflection loupe on plastic right maxillary first molars in manikins. The working posture was evaluated using the Posture Assessment Instrument (PAI). The access cavity preparation quality scores, procedure time, and PAI scores were compared between groups. Questionnaire results on residents' perceptions were also analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The access cavity preparation scores were higher for both loupe groups than the naked eye group. Procedure time was not different between groups. Both PAI_total and PAI_neck scores were statistically lower in the deflection loupe group and traditional loupe group than in the naked eye group. The deflection loupe group had lower PAI_neck scores than the traditional loupe group. Both traditional loupe and deflection loupe were rated positively in terms of precision, ergonomics, treatment quality, and adaptability. The deflection loupe was considered superior in ergonomics but less comfortable. Eye fatigue is a common problem for both types of loupes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both deflection loupe and traditional loupe can improve working posture and access cavity preparation quality. Deflection loupe had an ergonomic advantage over traditional loupe. The comfort of deflection loupe needed improvement because of its heavy weight. Another perceived problem of deflection loupe and traditional loupe was eye fatigue.</p>","PeriodicalId":50488,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dental Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144796027","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}