Epidemiologia & Prevenzione最新文献

Objectives: to investigate vaccine uptake among pregnant women during the 2nd and 3rd trimester of pregnancy. To describe the factors influencing vaccine uptake during pregnancy, comparing sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of pregnant women who were vaccinated during the 2nd or 3rd trimester with those who were not vaccinated, despite having the indication for vaccination.

Design: observational study with a cross-sectional approach and prevalence estimation in the population of women who gave birth in the study period, through record linkages between the ministry information flow Birth assistance certificate, the Regional vaccination register and the Italian flow for SARS-CoV-2 infections.

Setting and participants: the study included all the 4,772 pregnant women living in Trentino (north-east Italy), who were in the 2nd or 3rd trimester of pregnancy between the 5th May 2021 and the 28th February 2022 and who delivered in Trentino.

Main outcome measures: vaccine uptake among pregnant women during the 2nd and 3rd trimester of pregnancy. Results: 33.3% of pregnant women got vaccinated with at least one dose of vaccine during the 2nd or 3rd trimester of pregnancy. Independent factors associated with vaccine uptake in the 2nd or 3rd trimester were the mother's citizenship, educational level, occupational status and age.

Conclusions: the proportion of women who received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy was low. The results are important to start efficient actions to promote vaccination in pregnant women, particularly in the most vulnerable ones (unemployed, foreigners and with a low educational level), who appear to be less vaccinated frequently.

This is the second of a series of papers dedicated to the EASY-NET research programme (NET-2016-02364191). The rationale, structure and methodologies are described in the previous contribution. Scientific literature demonstrated that Audit & Feedback (A&F) is an effective strategy for continuous quality improvement and its effectiveness varies considerably according to factors that are currently little known. Some recent publication pointed out, with the contribution of an international group of experts, 15 suggestions to optimize A&F and developed a tool to evaluate their application. This tool, called REFLECT-52, includes 52 items related to the 15 suggestions and organized into four categories relating to the "Nature of the desired action", to the "Nature of the data available for feedback", to the "Feedback Display" and to the "Intervention delivery". Then, the aim of this work was to evaluate the level of adherence of A&F interventions tested in EASY-NET to suggestions from the literature by using a slightly adapted version of the REFLECT-52 tool, in its original language. In EASY-NET, 14 A&F interventions with different characteristics and in different clinical and organizational contexts were tested in seven Italian regions, each of these was evaluated by the respective research groups. Overall, the level of adherence was high in three of the four categories analysed, with some difficulties reported regarding the nature of the data available for feedback. In fact, contrary to what the literature suggests, it was not possible to send repeated feedback for some interventions and, in some cases, the data available for feedback presented a delay longer than one year. In summary, this analysis has confirmed a high level of compliance of the interventions tested with the suggestions from the literature, but it has also allowed researchers to identify critical aspects that need to be addressed for the future development of these strategies.

Objectives: to assess the potential of using longitudinal metropolitan studies (LMS) to study the association between long-term exposure to air pollution and the incidence of acute coronary events and stroke.

Design: closed cohort.

Setting and participants: subjects aged >=30 years, who took part in the 2011 census, residents in 5 cities (Turin, Bologna, Rome, Brindisi and Taranto). Annual concentrations of particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and warm-season ozone (O3) (annual O3 in Taranto and Brindisi), estimated through satellite (Turin, Bologna, Rome) or photochemical models (Taranto and Brindisi) with a spatial resolution of 1 km2, were assigned to the census address.

Main outcome measures: incidence of coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke until 31.12.2018 (2019 in Bologna). Cohort-specific Hazard Ratios (HRs), estimated using Cox regression models progressively adjusting for individual and contextual covariates, were pooled with random-effect meta-analysis.

Results: there were 71,872 incident CHD cases and 43,884 incident cases of stroke in almost 18 million person-years. No association was observed between the exposures studied and incidence of CHD and stroke, except for an increase in the incidence of CHD associated with warm-season O3 exposure (HR 1.034 per 5 μg/m3 increase). Some positive associations were found in specific cities (both outcomes in Brindisi with PM10 exposure and in Taranto with NO2 exposure, stroke in Rome with both PM10 and PM2.5), although estimates were not significant in some instances.

Conclusions: LMS are a high potential tool for the study of comparative medium- and long-term effects of air pollution. Their further development (different definitions of exposure, outcomes, characteristics of the urban areas and extension to other LMS) may make them even more valuable tools for monitoring and planning public health interventions.

Objectives: appropriate assessment of exposure to air pollution is crucial for the estimation of adverse effects on human health, both in the short and long term. Within the BIGEPI project, different indicators of long-term exposure to air pollution, in association with mortality by cause, were tested within the Italian longitudinal metropolitan studies (LMS). This allowed an evaluation of differences in effect estimates using the different exposure indicators.

Design: closed cohort.

Setting and participants: subjects aged >=30, who took part in the 2011 census, residents in 5 cities (Turin, Bologna, Rome, Brindisi and Taranto).

Main outcome measures: at the time of enrolment, residential exposure levels to particulate matter <=10 μm (PM10), PM <=2.5 μm (PM2.5), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and ozone (O3) for the period April-September (O3 warm season) were obtained from models at different spatial resolutions, from 1x1km to 200x200m (from the BEEP project) to 100x100m (ELAPSE project). In addition, locally developed models were used in each area (FARM photochemical model at 1x1-km for the cities of Rome, Taranto and Brindisi, Land-Use Regression (LUR) model for the city of Turin, PESCO model for Bologna). Cox proportional hazards models were applied to assess the association between exposure to air pollution (assessed using different exposure indicators) and natural mortality, adjusting for both individual and area covariates.

Results: the exposure levels derived by the different models varied between pollutants, with differences between the averages ranging from 3 to 20% for PM10, from 1 to 23% for PM2.5, and from 3 to 28% for NO2; the results for O3 were more heterogeneous. A total of 267,350 deaths from natural causes were observed. There is low heterogeneity in the effect estimates calculated from different environmental models, while there is greater variability in average exposure values, with different behaviour depending on the model and the characteristics of the area investigated. Differences are more pronounced where local risk factors are relevant, e.g., in industrial cities, thus suggesting the need of considering industrial exposure separately from other sources.

Conclusions: the numerous heterogeneities in the data used make it difficult to draw conclusions about the comparisons studied. Nevertheless, this study suggests that different approaches to the assessment of environmental exposure should be evaluated depending on the national or local level of interest, also according to the specifities of the investigated areas.

Objectives: the objective of this review is to give an overall view of the knowledge on COVID-19 bivalent vaccines and to explore the available real-world evidence on their effectiveness in the Omicron era. Currently, bivalent vaccines are generally offered to all groups eligible for their next booster, as defined by the national vaccination campaigns, with varying policies between countries.The use of bivalent vaccines is supported by immunogenity studies, but these have produced contradictory conclusions and are not generally designed to measure clinical impact.

Design: in order to critically evaluate the available research on real-world efficacy, a systematic literature search was performed; three different web engines were used, including early-stage search platforms: PubMed, medRxiv and the Global research on coronavirus disease (COVID-19) database.

Setting: no restrictions were imposed on language, setting or publication date. The research was last updated on 20 March 2023.

Main outcome measures: the following outcomes were considered: infection, hospitalisation due to COVID-19 disease, admission to the emergency/urgency department, death. The following were considered as additional outcomes: variant-specific vaccine effectiveness; vaccine effectiveness waning over time.

Results: out of 876 references reviewed, 14 studies were finally included and extracted. The results of this review show modest to moderate additional protection from vaccination with bivalent BA.4-5 or BA.1 vaccines mRNA-booster against COVID-19-associated disease - Relative VE% ranging from 8 (95% CI 0-16) to 58.7 (95% 54.6-62.5)- and hospitalisation - Relative VE% ranging from 32.2 (2.5-60.1) to 80.5 (95% CI 69.5-91.5)-, when compared with a booster with a monovalent vaccine or with having completed only the primary course, during a period when BA.5 and other Omicron sublineage viruses predominated globally.

Conclusions: the additional benefit of bivalent booster vaccines - compared to one or two monovalent booster vaccinations or compared to the primary course alone - in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection appears to be small, especially in persons with previous Omicron infection, whereas modest to moderate protection from vaccination with bivalent BA.4-5 or BA.1 mRNA-booster vaccines as a fourth dose against COVID-19-associated illness and hospitalisation has been reported.

Objectives: occupational exposure to vapours, gases, dusts and fumes (VGDF) plays an important role in the development and exacerbation of respiratory diseases. The aim of this study is to evaluate the possible association of occupational exposure to airborne pollutants and chronic respiratory diseases.

Design: multicase-control study.

Setting and participants: cases of chronic respiratory diseases and controls from the Italian multicentric study Gene Environment Interaction in Respiratory Diseases (GEIRD).

Main outcome measures: the occurrence of rhinitis, asthma, chronic bronchitis/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma severity, spirometry data, exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) were examined in relation to chronic and acute occupational exposures to airborne pollutants using multiple regression models.

Results: 2,943 subjects were enrolled in the study. Regularm exposure to VGDF was associated with a higher prevalence of chronic bronchitis/COPD (OR 1.40, 95%CI 0.98-1.99), especially in those also having asthma (OR 1.80, 95%CI 1.14-2.85), a lower prevalence of remittent asthma (OR 0.53, 95%CI 0.29-0.96) and, in those with asthma, an increased activity of the disease (severity score) (OR 1.77, 95%CI 1.20-2.60). No associations were observed between occupational exposure and prevalence of rhinitis, spirometry and FeNO data. Finally, an association was found between acute exposure to airborne pollutants (occupational and non-occupational) and the respiratory diseases investigated, in particular active asthma and asthma associated chronic bronchitis/BPCO.

Conclusions: these data confirm a significant role of occupational exposure to airborne pollutants on respiratory health, underlying the importance of workplace exposure prevention, in particular for more susceptible subjects, as those with respiratory diseases.