Pub Date : 2024-01-11DOI: 10.1177/21677026231221794
Katherine Seldin, Natalie F. Upton, Madison C. Feil, Michele R. Smith, Morgan A. Bryson, L. Lengua, K. King
Stress is considered a transdiagnostic mechanism underlying psychopathology. Research has suggested that when people experience more stress, they also act more impulsively. Most prior work has focused on between-persons associations or tested broad conceptualizations of impulsivity. We tested associations of momentary reports of perceived stress and appraisal of coping difficulty with three dimensions of impulsivity (urgency, planning, and persistence). High school and college students ( N = 146) self-reported momentary perceived stress, coping appraisals, affect, urgency, planning, and persistence three times per day for 10 days. Higher perceived stress was concurrently associated with higher urgency and lower persistence, even after controlling for negative affect. Higher coping appraisals were concurrently associated with higher planning and persistence. No prospective effects were observed. Perceived stress may relate to a time-limited decreased ability to regulate responses to negative affect and persist, whereas coping appraisals may be associated with changes in multiple types of self-regulation.
{"title":"State Perceived Stress Is Concurrently, but Not Prospectively, Associated With State Impulsivity in Youths","authors":"Katherine Seldin, Natalie F. Upton, Madison C. Feil, Michele R. Smith, Morgan A. Bryson, L. Lengua, K. King","doi":"10.1177/21677026231221794","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026231221794","url":null,"abstract":"Stress is considered a transdiagnostic mechanism underlying psychopathology. Research has suggested that when people experience more stress, they also act more impulsively. Most prior work has focused on between-persons associations or tested broad conceptualizations of impulsivity. We tested associations of momentary reports of perceived stress and appraisal of coping difficulty with three dimensions of impulsivity (urgency, planning, and persistence). High school and college students ( N = 146) self-reported momentary perceived stress, coping appraisals, affect, urgency, planning, and persistence three times per day for 10 days. Higher perceived stress was concurrently associated with higher urgency and lower persistence, even after controlling for negative affect. Higher coping appraisals were concurrently associated with higher planning and persistence. No prospective effects were observed. Perceived stress may relate to a time-limited decreased ability to regulate responses to negative affect and persist, whereas coping appraisals may be associated with changes in multiple types of self-regulation.","PeriodicalId":505170,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychological Science","volume":" 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139626523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-02DOI: 10.1177/21677026231214530
K. Chen, J. Merrilees, Casey Brown, Claire Yee, Anna Sapozhnikova, Jenna L. Wells, Emilio Ferrer, Peter S. Pressman, Barbara L. Fredrickson, Robert Levenson
Caring for a person with dementia (PWD) can produce declines in caregivers’ emotional well-being and physical functioning, which could result from disruptions in the emotional linkage between PWDs and caregivers. We examined the effects of interpersonal linkage in emotional behaviors on emotional well-being and physical functioning in caregivers and control partners. Forty-five PWD–caregiver dyads and 12 control dyads had a 10-min unrehearsed conflict conversation in the laboratory. We quantified positive and negative emotional linkage as the covariation between objectively coded positive and negative emotional behaviors during the conversation. Caregivers and one partner in the control dyads completed questionnaires concerning their emotional well-being and physical functioning. We found that lower positive emotional linkage was associated with lower emotional well-being in caregivers and control partners. We did not find similar effects with negative emotional linkage or for physical functioning. We offer possible explanations for these findings and implications for assessing caregiver risk.
{"title":"Interpersonal Linkage in Positive and Negative Emotional Behaviors, Emotional Well-Being, and Physical Functioning in Dementia Caregivers","authors":"K. Chen, J. Merrilees, Casey Brown, Claire Yee, Anna Sapozhnikova, Jenna L. Wells, Emilio Ferrer, Peter S. Pressman, Barbara L. Fredrickson, Robert Levenson","doi":"10.1177/21677026231214530","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026231214530","url":null,"abstract":"Caring for a person with dementia (PWD) can produce declines in caregivers’ emotional well-being and physical functioning, which could result from disruptions in the emotional linkage between PWDs and caregivers. We examined the effects of interpersonal linkage in emotional behaviors on emotional well-being and physical functioning in caregivers and control partners. Forty-five PWD–caregiver dyads and 12 control dyads had a 10-min unrehearsed conflict conversation in the laboratory. We quantified positive and negative emotional linkage as the covariation between objectively coded positive and negative emotional behaviors during the conversation. Caregivers and one partner in the control dyads completed questionnaires concerning their emotional well-being and physical functioning. We found that lower positive emotional linkage was associated with lower emotional well-being in caregivers and control partners. We did not find similar effects with negative emotional linkage or for physical functioning. We offer possible explanations for these findings and implications for assessing caregiver risk.","PeriodicalId":505170,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychological Science","volume":"131 38","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139453398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：