Pub Date : 2024-04-18DOI: 10.1007/s11916-024-01242-6
He Chen, Hangyu Shi, Shuai Gao, Jiufei Fang, Jiamin Yi, Wenhui Wu, Xinkun Liu, Zhishun Liu
Purpose of Review
Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a degenerative joint disease which can result in chronic pain and disability. The current interventions available for KOA often fail to provide long-lasting effects, highlighting the need for new treatment options that can offer durable benefits. Previous studies have suggested the efficacy of acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) with its durability remaining uncertain. In this review, we aimed to investigate the durability of the efficacy after completion of treatment.
Recent Findings
We performed thorough searches of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to November 4, 2023. The outcomes were assessed at all available time points after completion of treatment. Primary outcomes were changes from baseline in pain and function measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and function subscales. Secondary outcomes included response rate, overall pain, the WOMAC stiffness subscale, total WOMAC index, and physical and mental health components of 12/36-item Short-Form Health Survey. A total of 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 3221 participants were included. Pooled estimates suggested that acupuncture may offer potential improvements in function and overall pain for 4.5 months post-treatment versus sham acupuncture (SA). Acupuncture may provide durable clinically important pain relief and functional improvement up to 5 months post-treatment versus usual care, and up to 6 months post-treatment versus diclofenac. For acupuncture versus no treatment, one trial with large sample size indicated that improvements in pain and function persisted for 3 months post-treatment, while the other trial reported that significant pain reduction and functional improvement were only observed at the end of the treatment, not at 9 months post-treatment. However, acupuncture as adjunct to exercise-based physical therapy (EPT) showed no superiority to SA as an adjunct to EPT or EPT alone up to 11.25 months after completion of treatment.
Summary
Acupuncture may provide pain alleviation and functional improvements in KOA patients for 3 to 6 months after completion of treatment with a good safety profile.
{"title":"Durable Effects of Acupuncture for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"He Chen, Hangyu Shi, Shuai Gao, Jiufei Fang, Jiamin Yi, Wenhui Wu, Xinkun Liu, Zhishun Liu","doi":"10.1007/s11916-024-01242-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-024-01242-6","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose of Review</h3><p>Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a degenerative joint disease which can result in chronic pain and disability. The current interventions available for KOA often fail to provide long-lasting effects, highlighting the need for new treatment options that can offer durable benefits. Previous studies have suggested the efficacy of acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) with its durability remaining uncertain. In this review, we aimed to investigate the durability of the efficacy after completion of treatment.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Recent Findings</h3><p>We performed thorough searches of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to November 4, 2023. The outcomes were assessed at all available time points after completion of treatment. Primary outcomes were changes from baseline in pain and function measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and function subscales. Secondary outcomes included response rate, overall pain, the WOMAC stiffness subscale, total WOMAC index, and physical and mental health components of 12/36-item Short-Form Health Survey. A total of 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 3221 participants were included. Pooled estimates suggested that acupuncture may offer potential improvements in function and overall pain for 4.5 months post-treatment versus sham acupuncture (SA). Acupuncture may provide durable clinically important pain relief and functional improvement up to 5 months post-treatment versus usual care, and up to 6 months post-treatment versus diclofenac. For acupuncture versus no treatment, one trial with large sample size indicated that improvements in pain and function persisted for 3 months post-treatment, while the other trial reported that significant pain reduction and functional improvement were only observed at the end of the treatment, not at 9 months post-treatment. However, acupuncture as adjunct to exercise-based physical therapy (EPT) showed no superiority to SA as an adjunct to EPT or EPT alone up to 11.25 months after completion of treatment.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Summary</h3><p>Acupuncture may provide pain alleviation and functional improvements in KOA patients for 3 to 6 months after completion of treatment with a good safety profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":50602,"journal":{"name":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140625449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-18DOI: 10.1007/s11916-024-01256-0
Tzu-Chou Huang, Qadeer Arshad, Amir Kheradmand
Purpose of Review
To provide an update on comorbidity of vestibular symptoms and migraine.
Recent Findings
Multisensory processing and integration is a key concept for understanding mixed presentation of migraine and vestibular symptoms. Here, we discuss how vestibular migraine should be distinguished from a secondary migraine phenomenon in which migraine symptoms may coincide with or triggered by another vestibular disorder. We also have some updates on the diagnostic criteria of vestibular migraine, its pathophysiology, and common approaches used for its treatment.
Summary
As a common clinical presentation of migraine and vestibular symptoms, vestibular migraine should be distinguished from a secondary migraine phenomenon, in which migraine symptoms may be triggered by or coincide with another vestibular disorder. Recent experimental evidence suggests vestibular symptoms in vestibular migraine are linked to multisensory mechanisms that control body motion and orientation in space.
{"title":"Focused Update on Migraine and Vertigo Comorbidity","authors":"Tzu-Chou Huang, Qadeer Arshad, Amir Kheradmand","doi":"10.1007/s11916-024-01256-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-024-01256-0","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose of Review</h3><p>To provide an update on comorbidity of vestibular symptoms and migraine.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Recent Findings</h3><p>Multisensory processing and integration is a key concept for understanding mixed presentation of migraine and vestibular symptoms. Here, we discuss how vestibular migraine should be distinguished from a secondary migraine phenomenon in which migraine symptoms may coincide with or triggered by another vestibular disorder. We also have some updates on the diagnostic criteria of vestibular migraine, its pathophysiology, and common approaches used for its treatment.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Summary</h3><p>As a common clinical presentation of migraine and vestibular symptoms, vestibular migraine should be distinguished from a secondary migraine phenomenon, in which migraine symptoms may be triggered by or coincide with another vestibular disorder. Recent experimental evidence suggests vestibular symptoms in vestibular migraine are linked to multisensory mechanisms that control body motion and orientation in space.</p>","PeriodicalId":50602,"journal":{"name":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140629543","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-13DOI: 10.1007/s11916-024-01253-3
Sarah Mingels, Marita Granitzer, Kerstin Luedtke, Wim Dankaerts
Purpose of Review
Physiotherapy interventions for headache mostly include exercise and manual therapy. Yet, the complex nature of headache, sometimes characterized by symptoms of facilitated central pain mechanisms, demands an individualized approach in which therapeutic patient education could be supportive. This scoping review aimed to summarize the position of therapeutic patient education within the physiotherapy management of adults with headache. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched. The search-query comprised terminology relating to “headache”, “education”, and “physiotherapy”. Eligibility criteria were: adults with headache, interventions including education within the domain of physiotherapy, reviews, clinical trials, cohort, case report, case–control studies.
Recent Findings
Eleven publications were included from the 281 retrieved publications. These publications were clinical trials (n = 4), reviews (n = 4), case-reports (n = 2), and a guideline (n = 1). Type of headaches studied were migraine (n = 3), post-traumatic headache (n = 2), tension-type headache (n = 2), cervicogenic headache (n = 1), primary headaches (n = 1), chronic daily headache (n = 1), and mixed migraine-cervicogenic headache (n = 1). Education seems an umbrella-term for postural education, lifestyle advice, and pain education. Three themes emerged across the publications: handling headache triggers (migraine, post-traumatic headache), promoting active lifestyle (post-traumatic headache, chronic daily headache, migraine), evaluating posture (post-traumatic headache, chronic daily headache, tension-type headache, cervicogenic headache). All publications recommended education in the management of headache. Only one (of the 11 included) publication described the educational program and determined its efficacy.
Summary
Based on this scoping review, therapeutic patient education seems supported within physiotherapy management of headache. However, it is unclear how such education is tailored to the specific needs of the individual, the headache subtype, or when it should be added to physiotherapy management of headache.
{"title":"Therapeutic Patient Education as Part of the Physiotherapy Management of Adults with Headache: A Scoping Review","authors":"Sarah Mingels, Marita Granitzer, Kerstin Luedtke, Wim Dankaerts","doi":"10.1007/s11916-024-01253-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-024-01253-3","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose of Review</h3><p>Physiotherapy interventions for headache mostly include exercise and manual therapy. Yet, the complex nature of headache, sometimes characterized by symptoms of facilitated central pain mechanisms, demands an individualized approach in which therapeutic patient education could be supportive. This scoping review aimed to summarize the position of therapeutic patient education within the physiotherapy management of adults with headache. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched. The search-query comprised terminology relating to “headache”, “education”, and “physiotherapy”. Eligibility criteria were: adults with headache, interventions including education within the domain of physiotherapy, reviews, clinical trials, cohort, case report, case–control studies.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Recent Findings</h3><p>Eleven publications were included from the 281 retrieved publications. These publications were clinical trials (<i>n</i> = 4), reviews (<i>n</i> = 4), case-reports (<i>n</i> = 2), and a guideline (<i>n</i> = 1). Type of headaches studied were migraine (<i>n</i> = 3), post-traumatic headache (<i>n</i> = 2), tension-type headache (<i>n</i> = 2), cervicogenic headache (<i>n</i> = 1), primary headaches (<i>n</i> = 1), chronic daily headache (<i>n</i> = 1), and mixed migraine-cervicogenic headache (<i>n</i> = 1). Education seems an umbrella-term for postural education, lifestyle advice, and pain education. Three themes emerged across the publications: handling headache triggers (migraine, post-traumatic headache), promoting active lifestyle (post-traumatic headache, chronic daily headache, migraine), evaluating posture (post-traumatic headache, chronic daily headache, tension-type headache, cervicogenic headache). All publications recommended education in the management of headache. Only one (of the 11 included) publication described the educational program and determined its efficacy.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Summary</h3><p>Based on this scoping review, therapeutic patient education seems supported within physiotherapy management of headache. However, it is unclear how such education is tailored to the specific needs of the individual, the headache subtype, or when it should be added to physiotherapy management of headache.</p>","PeriodicalId":50602,"journal":{"name":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140569550","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-12DOI: 10.1007/s11916-024-01252-4
Mihai O. Botea, Lukas Andereggen, Richard D. Urman, Markus M. Luedi, Carolina S. Romero
Purpose of the Review
Acute pain management remains a challenge and postoperative pain is often undermanaged despite many available treatment options, also including cannabinoids.
Recent Findings
In the light of the opioid epidemic, there has been growing interest in alternative care bundles for pain management, including cannabinoids as potential treatment to decrease opioid prescribing. Despite the lack of solid evidence on the efficacy of cannabinoids, their use among patients with pain, including those using opioids, is currently increasing. This use is supported by data suggesting that cannabinoids could potentially contribute to a better pain management and to a reduction in opioid doses while maintaining effective analgesia with minimum side effects.
Summary
The scientific basis for supporting the use of cannabis is extensive, although it does not necessarily translate into relevant clinical outcomes. The use of cannabinoids in acute pain did not always consistently show statistically significant results in improving acute pain. Large randomized, controlled trials evaluating diverse cannabis extracts are needed in different clinical pain populations to determine safety and efficacy.
{"title":"Cannabinoids for Acute Pain Management: Approaches and Rationale","authors":"Mihai O. Botea, Lukas Andereggen, Richard D. Urman, Markus M. Luedi, Carolina S. Romero","doi":"10.1007/s11916-024-01252-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-024-01252-4","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose of the Review</h3><p>Acute pain management remains a challenge and postoperative pain is often undermanaged despite many available treatment options, also including cannabinoids.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Recent Findings</h3><p>In the light of the opioid epidemic, there has been growing interest in alternative care bundles for pain management, including cannabinoids as potential treatment to decrease opioid prescribing. Despite the lack of solid evidence on the efficacy of cannabinoids, their use among patients with pain, including those using opioids, is currently increasing. This use is supported by data suggesting that cannabinoids could potentially contribute to a better pain management and to a reduction in opioid doses while maintaining effective analgesia with minimum side effects.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Summary</h3><p>The scientific basis for supporting the use of cannabis is extensive, although it does not necessarily translate into relevant clinical outcomes. The use of cannabinoids in acute pain did not always consistently show statistically significant results in improving acute pain. Large randomized, controlled trials evaluating diverse cannabis extracts are needed in different clinical pain populations to determine safety and efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50602,"journal":{"name":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140570083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-12DOI: 10.1007/s11916-024-01247-1
Ahish Chitneni, Esha Jain, Sidharth Sahni, Philippe Mavrocordatos, Alaa Abd-Elsayed
Purpose of Review
Since the advent of spinal cord stimulation (SCS), advances in technology have allowed for improvement and treatment of various conditions, especially chronic pain. Additionally, as the system has developed, the ability to provide different stimulation waveforms for patients to treat different conditions has improved. The purpose and objective of the paper is to discuss basics of waveforms and present the most up-to-date literature and research studies on the different types of waveforms that currently exist. During our literature search, we came across over sixty articles that discuss the various waveforms we intend to evaluate.
Recent Findings
There are several publications on several waveforms used in clinical practice, but to our knowledge, this is the only educational document teaching on waveforms which provides essential knowledge.
Summary
There is a gap of knowledge related to understanding wave forms and how they work.
{"title":"Spinal Cord Stimulation Waveforms for the Treatment of Chronic Pain","authors":"Ahish Chitneni, Esha Jain, Sidharth Sahni, Philippe Mavrocordatos, Alaa Abd-Elsayed","doi":"10.1007/s11916-024-01247-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-024-01247-1","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose of Review</h3><p>Since the advent of spinal cord stimulation (SCS), advances in technology have allowed for improvement and treatment of various conditions, especially chronic pain. Additionally, as the system has developed, the ability to provide different stimulation waveforms for patients to treat different conditions has improved. The purpose and objective of the paper is to discuss basics of waveforms and present the most up-to-date literature and research studies on the different types of waveforms that currently exist. During our literature search, we came across over sixty articles that discuss the various waveforms we intend to evaluate.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Recent Findings</h3><p>There are several publications on several waveforms used in clinical practice, but to our knowledge, this is the only educational document teaching on waveforms which provides essential knowledge.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Summary</h3><p>There is a gap of knowledge related to understanding wave forms and how they work.</p>","PeriodicalId":50602,"journal":{"name":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","volume":"125 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140569444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-08DOI: 10.1007/s11916-024-01246-2
Sacha Moreau, Alexandra Thérond, Ivo H. Cerda, Kachina Studer, Alicia Pan, Jacob Tharpe, Jason E. Crowther, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Chris Gilligan, Reda Tolba, Sait Ashina, Michael E. Schatman, Alan D. Kaye, R. Jason Yong, Christopher L. Robinson
Purpose of Review
This review critically analyzes the recent literature on virtual reality’s (VR) use in acute and chronic pain management, offering insights into its efficacy, applications, and limitations.
Recent Findings
Recent studies, including meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials, have demonstrated VR’s effectiveness in reducing pain intensity in various acute pain scenarios, such as procedural/acute pain and in chronic pain conditions. The role of factors such as immersion and presence in enhancing VR’s efficacy has been emphasized. Further benefits have been identified in the use of VR for assessment as well as symptom gathering through conversational avatars. However, studies are limited, and strong conclusions will require further investigation.
Summary
VR is emerging as a promising non-pharmacological intervention in pain management for acute and chronic pain. However, its long-term efficacy, particularly in chronic pain management, remains an area requiring further research. Key findings highlight that VR programs vary in efficacy depending on the specificity of the origin of pain.
{"title":"Virtual Reality in Acute and Chronic Pain Medicine: An Updated Review","authors":"Sacha Moreau, Alexandra Thérond, Ivo H. Cerda, Kachina Studer, Alicia Pan, Jacob Tharpe, Jason E. Crowther, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Chris Gilligan, Reda Tolba, Sait Ashina, Michael E. Schatman, Alan D. Kaye, R. Jason Yong, Christopher L. Robinson","doi":"10.1007/s11916-024-01246-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-024-01246-2","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose of Review</h3><p>This review critically analyzes the recent literature on virtual reality’s (VR) use in acute and chronic pain management, offering insights into its efficacy, applications, and limitations.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Recent Findings</h3><p>Recent studies, including meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials, have demonstrated VR’s effectiveness in reducing pain intensity in various acute pain scenarios, such as procedural/acute pain and in chronic pain conditions. The role of factors such as immersion and presence in enhancing VR’s efficacy has been emphasized. Further benefits have been identified in the use of VR for assessment as well as symptom gathering through conversational avatars. However, studies are limited, and strong conclusions will require further investigation.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Summary</h3><p>VR is emerging as a promising non-pharmacological intervention in pain management for acute and chronic pain. However, its long-term efficacy, particularly in chronic pain management, remains an area requiring further research. Key findings highlight that VR programs vary in efficacy depending on the specificity of the origin of pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":50602,"journal":{"name":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","volume":"104 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140569536","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-06DOI: 10.1007/s11916-024-01213-x
Abstract
Purpose of Review
To summarize recent findings regarding triptan use in the acute treatment of pediatric migraine.
Recent Findings
Prevalence of pediatric migraine is rising. The American Headache Society and American Academy of Neurology updated guidelines to provide evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of acute migraine in youth. In the setting of a dearth of new randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we review current guidelines, triptan use in the emergency department, and an era of secondary analyses.
Summary
Measuring the efficacy of triptans in pediatric migraine has been challenged by high placebo response rates. Secondary analyses, combining data from multiple RCTs, support that triptans are safe and effective in the treatment of migraine. Triptans are a vital tool and the only FDA-approved migraine-specific treatment available in pediatrics. There is a need for further studies and funding support in pediatric headache medicine.
{"title":"Triptans in the Acute Migraine Management of Children and Adolescents: An Update","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s11916-024-01213-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-024-01213-x","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <span> <h3>Purpose of Review</h3> <p>To summarize recent findings regarding triptan use in the acute treatment of pediatric migraine.</p> </span> <span> <h3>Recent Findings</h3> <p>Prevalence of pediatric migraine is rising. The American Headache Society and American Academy of Neurology updated guidelines to provide evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of acute migraine in youth. In the setting of a dearth of new randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we review current guidelines, triptan use in the emergency department, and an era of secondary analyses.</p> </span> <span> <h3>Summary</h3> <p>Measuring the efficacy of triptans in pediatric migraine has been challenged by high placebo response rates. Secondary analyses, combining data from multiple RCTs, support that triptans are safe and effective in the treatment of migraine. Triptans are a vital tool and the only FDA-approved migraine-specific treatment available in pediatrics. There is a need for further studies and funding support in pediatric headache medicine.</p> </span>","PeriodicalId":50602,"journal":{"name":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","volume":"57 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140569446","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-04DOI: 10.1007/s11916-024-01215-9
Brittany Heckel
Purpose of Review
The purpose of this review is two-fold: (1) to discuss a case report of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) after abrupt cessation of a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist with resultant rapid weight gain and (2) to review the literature regarding the potential role of GLP-1 receptor agonists in the treatment of IIH as well as potential pitfalls.
Recent Findings
GLP-1 receptor agonists have become widely used to treat obesity. Obesity is a known risk factor for the development of IIH, though the precise pathophysiology is unclear. GLP-1 receptor agonists may help treat IIH by promoting weight loss, lipolysis of adipose tissue, and potentially decreasing the secretion of CSF, as was seen in rat models. Abrupt cessation of GLP-1 receptor agonists can result in regaining lost weight rapidly. In the case that we present, the patient stopped duraglutide abruptly due to lack of insurance coverage and regained the weight she had lost within a month. She subsequently developed IIH.
Summary
GLP-1 receptor agonists have the potential to help treat IIH; however, this class of medication needs to be used carefully, as cessation of the medication and resultant rapid weight gain can result in IIH.
{"title":"Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension After Abrupt Cessation of Medication: A Case Report of Abrupt Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Receptor Agonist Cessation and Review of the Literature","authors":"Brittany Heckel","doi":"10.1007/s11916-024-01215-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-024-01215-9","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose of Review</h3><p>The purpose of this review is two-fold: (1) to discuss a case report of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) after abrupt cessation of a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist with resultant rapid weight gain and (2) to review the literature regarding the potential role of GLP-1 receptor agonists in the treatment of IIH as well as potential pitfalls.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Recent Findings</h3><p>GLP-1 receptor agonists have become widely used to treat obesity. Obesity is a known risk factor for the development of IIH, though the precise pathophysiology is unclear. GLP-1 receptor agonists may help treat IIH by promoting weight loss, lipolysis of adipose tissue, and potentially decreasing the secretion of CSF, as was seen in rat models. Abrupt cessation of GLP-1 receptor agonists can result in regaining lost weight rapidly. In the case that we present, the patient stopped duraglutide abruptly due to lack of insurance coverage and regained the weight she had lost within a month. She subsequently developed IIH.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Summary</h3><p>GLP-1 receptor agonists have the potential to help treat IIH; however, this class of medication needs to be used carefully, as cessation of the medication and resultant rapid weight gain can result in IIH.</p>","PeriodicalId":50602,"journal":{"name":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140569534","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01Epub Date: 2024-01-26DOI: 10.1007/s11916-024-01210-0
Emily Stephens, Chathurika S Dhanasekara, Victor Montalvan, Bei Zhang, Ashley Bassett, Rebecca Hall, Alyssa Rodaniche, Christina Robohm-Leavitt, Chwan-Li Shen, Chanaka N Kahatuduwa
Purpose of review: Management of chronic daily headaches (CDH) remains challenging due to the limited efficacy of standard prophylactic pharmacological measures. Several studies have reported that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can effectively treat chronic headaches. The objective was to determine the utility of rTMS for immediate post-treatment and sustained CDH prophylaxis.
Recent findings: All procedures were conducted per PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ProQuest databases were searched for controlled clinical trials that have tested the efficacy of rTMS on populations with CDH. DerSimonian-Laird random-effects meta-analyses were performed using the 'meta' package in R to examine the post- vs. pre-rTMS changes in standardized headache intensity and frequency compared to sham-control conditions. Thirteen trials were included with a combined study population of N = 538 patients with CDH (rTMS, N = 284; Sham, N = 254). Patients exposed to rTMS had significantly reduced standardized CDH intensity and frequency in the immediate post-treatment period (Hedges' g = -1.16 [-1.89, -0.43], p = 0.002 and Δ = -5.07 [-10.05, -0.11], p = 0.045 respectively). However, these effects were sustained marginally in the follow-up period (Hedges' g = -0.43 [-0.76, -0.09], p = 0.012 and Δ = -3.33 [-5.52, -1.14], p = 0.003). Significant between-study heterogeneity was observed, at least partially driven by variations in rTMS protocols. Despite the observed clinically meaningful and statistically significant benefits in the immediate post-treatment period, the prophylactic effects of rTMS on CDH do not seem to sustain with discontinuation. Thus, the cost-effectiveness of the routine use of rTMS for CDH prophylaxis remains questionable.
Registration: Protocol preregistered in PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42021250100).
综述目的:由于标准预防性药物治疗的疗效有限,慢性日常头痛(CDH)的治疗仍具有挑战性。一些研究报告称,重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)可有效治疗慢性头痛。该研究旨在确定经颅磁刺激在治疗后立即和持续预防 CDH 方面的效用:所有程序均按照 PRISMA 指南进行。我们在 PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science 和 ProQuest 数据库中搜索了测试经颅磁刺激对 CDH 患者疗效的对照临床试验。使用 R 中的 "meta "软件包进行了 DerSimonian-Laird 随机效应荟萃分析,以检验经颅磁刺激后与经颅磁刺激前相比,假对照条件下标准化头痛强度和频率的变化。共纳入了 13 项试验,研究对象包括 N = 538 名 CDH 患者(经颅磁刺激,N = 284;假对照,N = 254)。接受经颅磁刺激治疗的患者在治疗后的一段时间内,CDH的标准化强度和频率明显降低(Hedges' g = -1.16 [-1.89, -0.43],p = 0.002;Δ = -5.07 [-10.05, -0.11],p = 0.045)。然而,这些影响在随访期间略有持续(Hedges' g = -0.43 [-0.76, -0.09], p = 0.012 和 Δ = -3.33 [-5.52, -1.14], p = 0.003)。研究之间存在显著的异质性,至少部分原因是经颅磁刺激方案的不同。尽管在治疗后短期内观察到了具有临床意义和统计学意义的疗效,但经颅磁刺激对 CDH 的预防效果似乎并不会随着治疗的中断而持续。因此,常规使用经颅磁刺激对 CDH 进行预防的成本效益仍然值得怀疑:协议已在 PROSPERO 国际系统综述前瞻性注册中心(CRD42021250100)注册。
{"title":"Utility of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Chronic Daily Headache Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Emily Stephens, Chathurika S Dhanasekara, Victor Montalvan, Bei Zhang, Ashley Bassett, Rebecca Hall, Alyssa Rodaniche, Christina Robohm-Leavitt, Chwan-Li Shen, Chanaka N Kahatuduwa","doi":"10.1007/s11916-024-01210-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11916-024-01210-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Management of chronic daily headaches (CDH) remains challenging due to the limited efficacy of standard prophylactic pharmacological measures. Several studies have reported that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can effectively treat chronic headaches. The objective was to determine the utility of rTMS for immediate post-treatment and sustained CDH prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>All procedures were conducted per PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ProQuest databases were searched for controlled clinical trials that have tested the efficacy of rTMS on populations with CDH. DerSimonian-Laird random-effects meta-analyses were performed using the 'meta' package in R to examine the post- vs. pre-rTMS changes in standardized headache intensity and frequency compared to sham-control conditions. Thirteen trials were included with a combined study population of N = 538 patients with CDH (rTMS, N = 284; Sham, N = 254). Patients exposed to rTMS had significantly reduced standardized CDH intensity and frequency in the immediate post-treatment period (Hedges' g = -1.16 [-1.89, -0.43], p = 0.002 and Δ = -5.07 [-10.05, -0.11], p = 0.045 respectively). However, these effects were sustained marginally in the follow-up period (Hedges' g = -0.43 [-0.76, -0.09], p = 0.012 and Δ = -3.33 [-5.52, -1.14], p = 0.003). Significant between-study heterogeneity was observed, at least partially driven by variations in rTMS protocols. Despite the observed clinically meaningful and statistically significant benefits in the immediate post-treatment period, the prophylactic effects of rTMS on CDH do not seem to sustain with discontinuation. Thus, the cost-effectiveness of the routine use of rTMS for CDH prophylaxis remains questionable.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>Protocol preregistered in PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42021250100).</p>","PeriodicalId":50602,"journal":{"name":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","volume":" ","pages":"149-167"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139562626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01Epub Date: 2024-01-31DOI: 10.1007/s11916-024-01217-7
Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Lukas J Henjum, Barnabas T Shiferaw, Peter E Yassa, Kenneth J Fiala
Purpose of review: The infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve (IPS) is an under-investigated nerve that can be a source of chronic knee pain. This literature review aims to deliver an up-to-date review of chronic pain transmitted via the IPS along with therapeutic approaches available for pain refractory to conservative measures.
Recent findings: Knee pain transmitted via the IPS can arise from several etiologies. Damage to the IPS is often iatrogenic and develops following total knee arthroplasty, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, and other knee surgical procedures. Other causes of IPS-derived pain include entrapment of the nerve, neuromas, Schwannomas, and pain from knee osteoarthritis transmitted through the IPS.This article investigated therapeutic approaches to pain derived from the IPS. Common approaches included radiofrequency ablation, neuroma excisions, Schwannoma excision, nerve blocks, surgical exploration, surgical release of an entrapped nerve, cryoablation, and peripheral nerve stimulation. Pain scores, duration of pain relief, adverse events, and secondary outcomes were all included in this review. A subset of the patient population experiences chronic pain deriving from the IPS that is refractory to conservative treatment measures. This review aims to evaluate the etiologies and therapeutic approaches for chronic pain arising from the IPS refractory to conservative treatments.
{"title":"Infrapatellar Branch of the Saphenous Nerve: Therapeutic Approaches to Chronic Knee Pain.","authors":"Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Lukas J Henjum, Barnabas T Shiferaw, Peter E Yassa, Kenneth J Fiala","doi":"10.1007/s11916-024-01217-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11916-024-01217-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve (IPS) is an under-investigated nerve that can be a source of chronic knee pain. This literature review aims to deliver an up-to-date review of chronic pain transmitted via the IPS along with therapeutic approaches available for pain refractory to conservative measures.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Knee pain transmitted via the IPS can arise from several etiologies. Damage to the IPS is often iatrogenic and develops following total knee arthroplasty, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, and other knee surgical procedures. Other causes of IPS-derived pain include entrapment of the nerve, neuromas, Schwannomas, and pain from knee osteoarthritis transmitted through the IPS.This article investigated therapeutic approaches to pain derived from the IPS. Common approaches included radiofrequency ablation, neuroma excisions, Schwannoma excision, nerve blocks, surgical exploration, surgical release of an entrapped nerve, cryoablation, and peripheral nerve stimulation. Pain scores, duration of pain relief, adverse events, and secondary outcomes were all included in this review. A subset of the patient population experiences chronic pain deriving from the IPS that is refractory to conservative treatment measures. This review aims to evaluate the etiologies and therapeutic approaches for chronic pain arising from the IPS refractory to conservative treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":50602,"journal":{"name":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","volume":" ","pages":"279-294"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139643266","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}