首页 > 最新文献

Current Pain and Headache Reports最新文献

英文 中文
Risks and Benefits of Cervical Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections: A Comprehensive Review. 颈椎经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射的风险和益处:综合综述。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-04-02 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-025-01385-0
Jamal Hasoon, Ashlyn Brown, Alexandra Moauro, Omar Viswanath, Alaa Abd-Elsayed

Purpose of review: Cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections (CTFESIs) are widely used for the treatment of radicular pain caused by cervical spine pathology, including disc herniations and foraminal stenosis. This review aims to analyze the risks and benefits of CTFESIs, address their efficacy and safety profile, improve clinical decision-making, and educate interventional pain medicine physicians.

Recent findings: CTFESIs have demonstrated benefits such as pain relief, functional improvement, and the potential to avoid surgical interventions. However, their use is limited by safety concerns due to the proximity of vascular structures in the cervical spine. Complications, including neurological injuries, infections, and vascular injuries, though rare, can be severe. Recent studies emphasize the importance of using advanced procedural techniques, such as fluoroscopic guidance and non-particulate corticosteroids, to minimize risks. CTFESIs remain a valuable tool for managing cervical radiculopathy in selected patients. While they provide substantial therapeutic and diagnostic benefits, careful patient selection and adherence to safety protocols are crucial to minimizing serious complications. This review compiles current evidence to assist clinicians in evaluating the risks and benefits of CTFESIs in clinical practice.

回顾目的:颈椎经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射(CTFESIs)被广泛用于治疗颈椎病变引起的神经根性疼痛,包括椎间盘突出和椎间孔狭窄。本综述旨在分析CTFESIs的风险和益处,探讨其有效性和安全性,改善临床决策,并教育介入性疼痛医学医师。最近的研究发现:CTFESIs已经证明了诸如疼痛缓解、功能改善和避免手术干预的潜力等益处。然而,由于颈椎血管结构接近,其使用受到安全问题的限制。并发症,包括神经损伤、感染和血管损伤,虽然罕见,但可能很严重。最近的研究强调了使用先进的手术技术的重要性,如透视引导和非颗粒皮质类固醇,以尽量减少风险。ctfis仍然是一个有价值的工具,以管理颈神经根病在选定的患者。虽然它们提供了大量的治疗和诊断益处,但谨慎的患者选择和遵守安全方案对于最大限度地减少严重并发症至关重要。本综述收集了当前的证据,以帮助临床医生在临床实践中评估ctfis的风险和益处。
{"title":"Risks and Benefits of Cervical Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections: A Comprehensive Review.","authors":"Jamal Hasoon, Ashlyn Brown, Alexandra Moauro, Omar Viswanath, Alaa Abd-Elsayed","doi":"10.1007/s11916-025-01385-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11916-025-01385-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections (CTFESIs) are widely used for the treatment of radicular pain caused by cervical spine pathology, including disc herniations and foraminal stenosis. This review aims to analyze the risks and benefits of CTFESIs, address their efficacy and safety profile, improve clinical decision-making, and educate interventional pain medicine physicians.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>CTFESIs have demonstrated benefits such as pain relief, functional improvement, and the potential to avoid surgical interventions. However, their use is limited by safety concerns due to the proximity of vascular structures in the cervical spine. Complications, including neurological injuries, infections, and vascular injuries, though rare, can be severe. Recent studies emphasize the importance of using advanced procedural techniques, such as fluoroscopic guidance and non-particulate corticosteroids, to minimize risks. CTFESIs remain a valuable tool for managing cervical radiculopathy in selected patients. While they provide substantial therapeutic and diagnostic benefits, careful patient selection and adherence to safety protocols are crucial to minimizing serious complications. This review compiles current evidence to assist clinicians in evaluating the risks and benefits of CTFESIs in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50602,"journal":{"name":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","volume":"29 1","pages":"72"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143765701","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Epidemiology of Pediatric Chronic Pain: An Overview of Systematic Reviews. 小儿慢性疼痛的流行病学:系统综述》。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-025-01380-5
Alessio Lo Cascio, Miriam Cascino, Marcella Dabbene, Antonella Paladini, Omar Viswanath, Giustino Varrassi, Roberto Latina

Purpose of review: Chronic non-cancer pain in children and adolescents represents a significant public health issue, affecting physical, psychological, and social well-being. Defined as pain persisting for over three months, this condition is influenced by developmental, socioeconomic, and cultural factors. However, its prevalence remains uncertain and debated. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across electronic databases, including Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library. Eligible systematic reviews were critically appraised using the AMSTAR-2 tool to assess methodological quality. This overview synthesises evidence from existing systematic reviews to provide an updated understanding of the epidemiology and burden of paediatric non-cancer chronic pain.

Recent findings: Findings revealed substantial variability in the reported prevalence of specific pain types: headaches (4-83%), abdominal pain (4-53%), musculoskeletal pain (4-40%), and back/low-back pain (14-24%). Prevalence was generally lower in low- and middle-income countries, likely due to barriers in healthcare access. Methodological heterogeneity was observed across studies, and AMSTAR-2 assessment identified critical limitations in some systematic reviews, impacting the reliability of findings. This overview highlights the urgent need for standardised research methodologies to accurately monitor the prevalence of paediatric non-cancer chronic pain. Standardisation is essential for informing policies aimed at mitigating the long-term impact of chronic pain in children and adolescents. Addressing these issues, particularly in resource-limited settings, is crucial for improving health outcomes and reducing societal and economic burdens.

审查目的:儿童和青少年的慢性非癌症疼痛是一个重要的公共卫生问题,影响着他们的身体、心理和社会福祉。慢性非癌症疼痛的定义是疼痛持续时间超过三个月,这种情况受到发育、社会经济和文化因素的影响。然而,其发病率仍不确定,且存在争议。我们在 Medline、Embase、CINAHL、PsycINFO 和 Cochrane 图书馆等电子数据库中进行了全面的文献检索。采用 AMSTAR-2 工具对符合条件的系统性综述进行了严格评估,以评估其方法学质量。本综述综合了现有系统综述中的证据,提供了对儿科非癌症慢性疼痛的流行病学和负担的最新认识:研究结果显示,特定疼痛类型的报告患病率存在很大差异:头痛(4-83%)、腹痛(4-53%)、肌肉骨骼疼痛(4-40%)和背部/腰背部疼痛(14-24%)。中低收入国家的患病率普遍较低,这可能是由于医疗保健服务方面的障碍所致。不同研究之间存在方法异质性,AMSTAR-2 评估发现一些系统性综述存在严重局限性,影响了研究结果的可靠性。本综述强调了对标准化研究方法的迫切需求,以准确监测儿科非癌症慢性疼痛的患病率。标准化对于制定旨在减轻儿童和青少年慢性疼痛长期影响的政策至关重要。解决这些问题,尤其是在资源有限的环境中解决这些问题,对于改善健康状况、减轻社会和经济负担至关重要。
{"title":"Epidemiology of Pediatric Chronic Pain: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.","authors":"Alessio Lo Cascio, Miriam Cascino, Marcella Dabbene, Antonella Paladini, Omar Viswanath, Giustino Varrassi, Roberto Latina","doi":"10.1007/s11916-025-01380-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11916-025-01380-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Chronic non-cancer pain in children and adolescents represents a significant public health issue, affecting physical, psychological, and social well-being. Defined as pain persisting for over three months, this condition is influenced by developmental, socioeconomic, and cultural factors. However, its prevalence remains uncertain and debated. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across electronic databases, including Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library. Eligible systematic reviews were critically appraised using the AMSTAR-2 tool to assess methodological quality. This overview synthesises evidence from existing systematic reviews to provide an updated understanding of the epidemiology and burden of paediatric non-cancer chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Findings revealed substantial variability in the reported prevalence of specific pain types: headaches (4-83%), abdominal pain (4-53%), musculoskeletal pain (4-40%), and back/low-back pain (14-24%). Prevalence was generally lower in low- and middle-income countries, likely due to barriers in healthcare access. Methodological heterogeneity was observed across studies, and AMSTAR-2 assessment identified critical limitations in some systematic reviews, impacting the reliability of findings. This overview highlights the urgent need for standardised research methodologies to accurately monitor the prevalence of paediatric non-cancer chronic pain. Standardisation is essential for informing policies aimed at mitigating the long-term impact of chronic pain in children and adolescents. Addressing these issues, particularly in resource-limited settings, is crucial for improving health outcomes and reducing societal and economic burdens.</p>","PeriodicalId":50602,"journal":{"name":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","volume":"29 1","pages":"71"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11961504/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143755746","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prophylactic Fibrin Glue Application for Immediate Management of Dural Puncture during Spinal Cord Stimulation Lead Placement: a Simple and Effective Technique. 预防性纤维蛋白胶应用于脊髓刺激置铅时硬脑膜穿刺的即时处理:一种简单有效的技术。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-03-25 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-025-01381-4
Roberto Gazzeri, Marcelo Galarza, Felice Occhigrossi, Omar Viswanath, Giustino Varrassi, Matteo Luigi Giuseppe Leoni

Background: Accidental dural puncture during epidural lead insertion for Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) is a recognized surgical complication that may lead to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage and subsequent postdural puncture headache (PDPH). The optimal technical approach to prevent CSF leakage remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate a simple and efficient intraoperative technique for managing accidental dural puncture during SCS lead placement.

Materials and methods: A retrospective review was conducted of the medical records and imaging studies of all patients who underwent SCS procedures between January 2020 and April 2024. Signs or symptoms associated with dural puncture were recorded, including subcutaneous fluid collections, pseudomeningocele formation, PDPH, wound infection, and meningitis.

Results: Among 107 patients who underwent SCS implantation, involving a total of 194 lead insertions, 4 cases (3.7%) of intraoperative CSF leakage due to iatrogenic dural puncture were identified. Each case was managed by injecting fibrin glue through the introducer needle into the epidural space, directly over the dural lesion.

Conclusions: Prophylactic application of fibrin glue following dural puncture appears to be highly effective in sealing the damage and preventing CSF leakage. This technique offers a valuable intraoperative solution for surgeons to immediately address dural injuries during SCS lead placement, potentially minimizing postoperative complications and improving patient outcomes.

背景:脊髓刺激(SCS)术中硬膜外导联插入时意外硬脊膜穿刺是公认的外科并发症,可能导致脑脊液(CSF)渗漏和随后的硬脊膜穿刺后头痛(PDPH)。预防脑脊液渗漏的最佳技术方法仍有争议。本研究旨在评估一种简单有效的术中处理SCS导联置入过程中意外硬脑膜穿刺的技术。材料和方法:对2020年1月至2024年4月期间接受SCS手术的所有患者的病历和影像学研究进行回顾性分析。记录与硬脑膜穿刺相关的体征或症状,包括皮下积液、假性脑膜膨出形成、PDPH、伤口感染和脑膜炎。结果:107例行SCS植入的患者,共194次铅管置入,术中发现医源性硬脑膜穿刺引起的脑脊液漏4例(3.7%)。每个病例都是通过引入针将纤维蛋白胶直接注射到硬膜外间隙,直接在硬膜病变上。结论:硬脑膜穿刺后预防性应用纤维蛋白胶可有效封堵损伤,防止脑脊液渗漏。该技术为外科医生提供了一种有价值的术中解决方案,可以在置入SCS导联时立即处理硬脑膜损伤,潜在地减少术后并发症并改善患者预后。
{"title":"Prophylactic Fibrin Glue Application for Immediate Management of Dural Puncture during Spinal Cord Stimulation Lead Placement: a Simple and Effective Technique.","authors":"Roberto Gazzeri, Marcelo Galarza, Felice Occhigrossi, Omar Viswanath, Giustino Varrassi, Matteo Luigi Giuseppe Leoni","doi":"10.1007/s11916-025-01381-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11916-025-01381-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accidental dural puncture during epidural lead insertion for Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) is a recognized surgical complication that may lead to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage and subsequent postdural puncture headache (PDPH). The optimal technical approach to prevent CSF leakage remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate a simple and efficient intraoperative technique for managing accidental dural puncture during SCS lead placement.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted of the medical records and imaging studies of all patients who underwent SCS procedures between January 2020 and April 2024. Signs or symptoms associated with dural puncture were recorded, including subcutaneous fluid collections, pseudomeningocele formation, PDPH, wound infection, and meningitis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 107 patients who underwent SCS implantation, involving a total of 194 lead insertions, 4 cases (3.7%) of intraoperative CSF leakage due to iatrogenic dural puncture were identified. Each case was managed by injecting fibrin glue through the introducer needle into the epidural space, directly over the dural lesion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prophylactic application of fibrin glue following dural puncture appears to be highly effective in sealing the damage and preventing CSF leakage. This technique offers a valuable intraoperative solution for surgeons to immediately address dural injuries during SCS lead placement, potentially minimizing postoperative complications and improving patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50602,"journal":{"name":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","volume":"29 1","pages":"70"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143711970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy and Safety of Thoracic Epidural vs. Paravertebral Block for Analgesia in Thoracotomy: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. 胸开胸术中硬膜外阻滞与椎旁阻滞镇痛的有效性和安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价。
IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-03-24 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-025-01383-2
Gabrielle K Eaves, Erin E Ware, Devin R Touchet, Whitney K Hamilton, Steele S Netterville, Jacob R Stevens, Shahab Ahmadzadeh, Sahar Shekoohi, Alan D Kaye

Purpose of review: This systematic review aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of thoracic epidural block (TEB) and thoracic paravertebral block (TPB) for managing postoperative pain following thoracotomy for pulmonary procedures.

Recent findings: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published prior to April 10, 2024. Studies were eligible if they compared TEB and TPB in adult patients undergoing thoracotomy for pulmonary procedures and reported outcomes on postoperative pain, opioid consumption, hemodynamic parameters, or complications. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. The review adhered to PRISMA guidelines. From 1,114 records screened, 7 RCTs comprising 429 patients met the inclusion criteria. TEB demonstrated superior pain relief in the immediate postoperative period, particularly when continuous infusions with opioids were utilized. TPB, however, provided greater hemodynamic stability, with significantly lower rates of hypotension and more stable mean arterial pressure and heart rate during the first 24 h. Beyond 24 h, both techniques offered comparable pain relief and opioid consumption. While the incidence of nausea, vomiting, and urinary retention was similar between groups, TPB was associated with fewer respiratory complications. Both TEB and TPB are effective for postoperative pain management following thoracotomy, each with distinct advantages. TEB provides optimal early pain control, making it suitable for patients with significant early postoperative pain. TPB, with its superior hemodynamic profile, is better suited for patients at risk of hypotension or cardiovascular instability. Tailoring analgesic strategies to patient-specific needs can optimize outcomes. Future large-scale RCTs are necessary to confirm these findings across broader thoracic surgical populations.

Registration and protocol: This review was registered with PROSPERO prior to initiation (Registration Number: CRD42024578768).

综述目的:本系统性综述旨在比较胸腔硬膜外阻滞(TEB)和胸椎旁阻滞(TPB)治疗肺部手术开胸术后疼痛的有效性和安全性:对PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Google Scholar进行了全面检索,发现了2024年4月10日之前发表的随机对照试验(RCT)。只要对接受开胸肺部手术的成年患者进行TEB和TPB比较,并报告了术后疼痛、阿片类药物消耗、血流动力学参数或并发症等结果的研究均符合条件。两名审稿人独立筛选研究、提取数据,并使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估质量。综述遵循了 PRISMA 指南。从筛选出的 1,114 份记录中,有 7 项 RCT(共 429 名患者)符合纳入标准。TEB在术后初期的疼痛缓解效果更佳,尤其是在持续输注阿片类药物的情况下。然而,TPB 的血液动力学稳定性更高,在最初的 24 小时内,低血压发生率明显降低,平均动脉压和心率更稳定。虽然两组患者的恶心、呕吐和尿潴留发生率相似,但 TPB 与较少的呼吸系统并发症相关。TEB 和 TPB 对开胸手术后的疼痛控制都很有效,但各有千秋。TEB 可提供最佳的早期疼痛控制,因此适合术后早期疼痛明显的患者。TPB 具有较好的血液动力学特性,更适合有低血压或心血管不稳定风险的患者。根据患者的具体需求定制镇痛策略可以优化治疗效果。未来有必要进行大规模的 RCT 研究,以便在更广泛的胸外科人群中证实这些发现:本综述在启动前已在 PROSPERO 注册(注册号:CRD42024578768)。
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Thoracic Epidural vs. Paravertebral Block for Analgesia in Thoracotomy: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Gabrielle K Eaves, Erin E Ware, Devin R Touchet, Whitney K Hamilton, Steele S Netterville, Jacob R Stevens, Shahab Ahmadzadeh, Sahar Shekoohi, Alan D Kaye","doi":"10.1007/s11916-025-01383-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11916-025-01383-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This systematic review aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of thoracic epidural block (TEB) and thoracic paravertebral block (TPB) for managing postoperative pain following thoracotomy for pulmonary procedures.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published prior to April 10, 2024. Studies were eligible if they compared TEB and TPB in adult patients undergoing thoracotomy for pulmonary procedures and reported outcomes on postoperative pain, opioid consumption, hemodynamic parameters, or complications. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. The review adhered to PRISMA guidelines. From 1,114 records screened, 7 RCTs comprising 429 patients met the inclusion criteria. TEB demonstrated superior pain relief in the immediate postoperative period, particularly when continuous infusions with opioids were utilized. TPB, however, provided greater hemodynamic stability, with significantly lower rates of hypotension and more stable mean arterial pressure and heart rate during the first 24 h. Beyond 24 h, both techniques offered comparable pain relief and opioid consumption. While the incidence of nausea, vomiting, and urinary retention was similar between groups, TPB was associated with fewer respiratory complications. Both TEB and TPB are effective for postoperative pain management following thoracotomy, each with distinct advantages. TEB provides optimal early pain control, making it suitable for patients with significant early postoperative pain. TPB, with its superior hemodynamic profile, is better suited for patients at risk of hypotension or cardiovascular instability. Tailoring analgesic strategies to patient-specific needs can optimize outcomes. Future large-scale RCTs are necessary to confirm these findings across broader thoracic surgical populations.</p><p><strong>Registration and protocol: </strong>This review was registered with PROSPERO prior to initiation (Registration Number: CRD42024578768).</p>","PeriodicalId":50602,"journal":{"name":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","volume":"29 1","pages":"69"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143702028","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reviewing Psychological Practices to Enhance the Psychological Resilience Process for Individuals with Chronic Pain: Clinical Implications and Neurocognitive Findings. 回顾心理实践以增强慢性疼痛个体的心理恢复过程:临床意义和神经认知研究结果。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-03-22 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-025-01373-4
Elif Çalışkan, Füsun Gökkaya

Purpose of review: Psychological practices have emerged as promising treatments for coping with chronic pain (CP) as a psychological resilience (PR) enhancer mechanism. These practices contain cognitive, behavioral and emotional modulation of pain. In this regard, classical cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and current trends in CBT, including acceptance and commitment therapy and mindfulness-based practices may demonstrate significant improvements in pain perception, physical functioning, catastrophic beliefs and fear-avoidance behaviors among patients with CP. However, understanding the neurocognitive mechanisms of these practices includes challenges, such as the need to identify associated brain regions with PR to CP. Our review explored psychological practices to enhance PR as a dynamic neurocognitive process (e.g., changing affect) rather than only being a static trait.

Recent findings: Psychological practices have promising results in improving positive outcomes for CP sufferers. To illustrate, along with superior PR scores, higher positive affect, adaptive pain beliefs, and physical functioning were reported after these practices. Conversely, lower pain catastrophizing, pain-related fear-avoidance, and self-reported pain ratings were seen as PR factors. Moreover, enhanced PR process may be associated with increased activity of the brain regions, including prefrontal cortex and orbitofrontal cortex, whereas diminished activity, reactivity, and functional connectivity in the anterior cingulate cortex, amygdala and insula. This review discusses the neurocognitive modulation of CP through psychological practices and highlights the role of enhancing the PR process for individuals with CP. As the field continues to evolve, understanding the importance of psychological practices to develop PR-related factors is crucial for increasing pain management outcomes.

综述目的:心理实践作为一种心理弹性(PR)增强机制,已成为应对慢性疼痛(CP)的有希望的治疗方法。这些实践包括对疼痛的认知、行为和情绪调节。在这方面,经典认知行为疗法(CBT)和当前的CBT趋势,包括接受和承诺疗法以及基于正念的实践,可能会在CP患者的疼痛感知、身体功能、灾难性信念和恐惧回避行为方面显示出显著的改善。然而,理解这些实践的神经认知机制包括挑战,例如,需要识别与PR到CP相关的大脑区域。我们的综述探讨了心理学实践,以增强PR作为一个动态的神经认知过程(例如,改变情感),而不仅仅是一个静态的特征。最近的研究发现:心理实践在改善CP患者的积极结果方面有希望的结果。为了说明这一点,在这些练习之后,伴随着更高的PR得分,更高的积极影响,适应性疼痛信念和身体功能。相反,较低的疼痛灾难化、与疼痛相关的恐惧回避和自我报告的疼痛评级被视为PR因素。此外,PR过程的增强可能与包括前额叶皮层和眶额叶皮层在内的大脑区域的活动增加有关,而前扣带皮层、杏仁核和脑岛的活动、反应性和功能连通性降低有关。这篇综述讨论了通过心理实践对CP的神经认知调节,并强调了增强CP患者PR过程的作用。随着该领域的不断发展,了解心理实践对开发PR相关因素的重要性对于提高疼痛管理结果至关重要。
{"title":"Reviewing Psychological Practices to Enhance the Psychological Resilience Process for Individuals with Chronic Pain: Clinical Implications and Neurocognitive Findings.","authors":"Elif Çalışkan, Füsun Gökkaya","doi":"10.1007/s11916-025-01373-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11916-025-01373-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Psychological practices have emerged as promising treatments for coping with chronic pain (CP) as a psychological resilience (PR) enhancer mechanism. These practices contain cognitive, behavioral and emotional modulation of pain. In this regard, classical cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and current trends in CBT, including acceptance and commitment therapy and mindfulness-based practices may demonstrate significant improvements in pain perception, physical functioning, catastrophic beliefs and fear-avoidance behaviors among patients with CP. However, understanding the neurocognitive mechanisms of these practices includes challenges, such as the need to identify associated brain regions with PR to CP. Our review explored psychological practices to enhance PR as a dynamic neurocognitive process (e.g., changing affect) rather than only being a static trait.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Psychological practices have promising results in improving positive outcomes for CP sufferers. To illustrate, along with superior PR scores, higher positive affect, adaptive pain beliefs, and physical functioning were reported after these practices. Conversely, lower pain catastrophizing, pain-related fear-avoidance, and self-reported pain ratings were seen as PR factors. Moreover, enhanced PR process may be associated with increased activity of the brain regions, including prefrontal cortex and orbitofrontal cortex, whereas diminished activity, reactivity, and functional connectivity in the anterior cingulate cortex, amygdala and insula. This review discusses the neurocognitive modulation of CP through psychological practices and highlights the role of enhancing the PR process for individuals with CP. As the field continues to evolve, understanding the importance of psychological practices to develop PR-related factors is crucial for increasing pain management outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50602,"journal":{"name":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","volume":"29 1","pages":"68"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11929684/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143693716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fasting and Headache. 禁食和头痛。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-03-21 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-024-01326-3
Patrick T Ebbert, Lauren R Natbony

Purpose of review: This review synthesizes the latest updates in the literature on the connection between fasting and migraine, examining both clinical outcomes and underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.

Recent findings: Although no studies have specifically explored fasting as a therapeutic intervention for migraine, various retrospective analyses suggest that fasting might worsen migraine symptoms in the short term. On the other hand, recent investigations, including several randomized controlled trials, have shown that ketogenic diets significantly reduce the number of migraine days and decrease inflammation markers. Additional research has shown improvements in disability assessments, as indicated by VAS, MIDAS, and HIT-6 scores. These benefits are not replicated by merely administering ketone bodies. Furthermore, genetic studies have found a link between glycemic processing and the occurrence of migraine. There is accumulating evidence that ketogenesis can reduce both the frequency and disability associated with migraine, likely through the reduction of systemic inflammatory markers and diminished cortical excitability. However, the potential benefits of intermittent fasting on migraine prevention remain underexplored and warrant further investigation.

综述目的:本综述综合了禁食与偏头痛之间联系的最新文献,研究了临床结果和潜在的病理生理机制。最近的发现:虽然没有研究专门探讨禁食作为偏头痛的治疗干预,但各种回顾性分析表明,禁食可能会在短期内加重偏头痛症状。另一方面,最近的研究,包括一些随机对照试验,表明生酮饮食显著减少偏头痛的天数和减少炎症标志物。额外的研究表明,残疾评估的改善,如VAS, MIDAS和HIT-6评分所示。这些好处不能仅仅通过管理酮体来复制。此外,遗传学研究还发现了血糖生成过程与偏头痛的发生之间的联系。越来越多的证据表明,生酮可能通过减少全身炎症标志物和皮质兴奋性降低,从而减少偏头痛的发生频率和与偏头痛相关的残疾。然而,间歇性禁食对偏头痛预防的潜在益处仍有待进一步研究。
{"title":"Fasting and Headache.","authors":"Patrick T Ebbert, Lauren R Natbony","doi":"10.1007/s11916-024-01326-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11916-024-01326-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review synthesizes the latest updates in the literature on the connection between fasting and migraine, examining both clinical outcomes and underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Although no studies have specifically explored fasting as a therapeutic intervention for migraine, various retrospective analyses suggest that fasting might worsen migraine symptoms in the short term. On the other hand, recent investigations, including several randomized controlled trials, have shown that ketogenic diets significantly reduce the number of migraine days and decrease inflammation markers. Additional research has shown improvements in disability assessments, as indicated by VAS, MIDAS, and HIT-6 scores. These benefits are not replicated by merely administering ketone bodies. Furthermore, genetic studies have found a link between glycemic processing and the occurrence of migraine. There is accumulating evidence that ketogenesis can reduce both the frequency and disability associated with migraine, likely through the reduction of systemic inflammatory markers and diminished cortical excitability. However, the potential benefits of intermittent fasting on migraine prevention remain underexplored and warrant further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50602,"journal":{"name":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","volume":"29 1","pages":"67"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143674866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trends in Mixed Pain Research Over Three Decades (1993-2024): A Bibliometric Analysis. 三十年来混合性疼痛研究趋势(1993-2024):文献计量学分析。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-025-01371-6
Matteo Luigi Giuseppe Leoni, Marco Mercieri, Roberto Gazzeri, Marco Cascella, Martina Rekatsina, Omar Viswanath, Alberto Pasqualucci, Giustino Varrassi

Background: The term "mixed pain" is frequently used in clinical practice to describe the coexistence of nociceptive, neuropathic, and nociplastic pain mechanisms. However, its inconsistent use and lack of a formal definition warrant further investigation. This bibliometric analysis aims to explore publication trends, research networks, and key themes in mixed pain literature.

Methods: A bibliometric analysis was conducted using the Web of Science Core Collection. The search was performed in February 2024, with journal rankings obtained from Journal Citation Reports™ 2022 (Clarivate Analytics). Extracted data included publication trends, citation analysis, co-authorship networks, and keyword mapping.

Results: A total of 229 publications were identified, demonstrating an increasing trend in both publication volume and citations. Most studies were published in high-ranking Q1 journals as research (77%) and review articles (19%). The USA (21%), Italy (15%), and Germany (12%) were the leading contributors, yet global collaboration was weak, with limited co-authorship connections except within the USA. The keyword analysis revealed five major research clusters, with "neuropathic pain," "management," and "quality of life" emerging as central themes.

Conclusions: Despite the progressive increase in mixed pain articles in highly ranked journals, this bibliometric analysis highlighted the absence of a well-structured collaborative network among authors and a lack of clear connections between keywords. Given the critical clinical implications of mixed pain, further high-quality studies on this topic and enhanced international collaborations are recommended.

背景:在临床实践中,“混合性疼痛”一词经常被用来描述伤害性、神经性和伤害性疼痛机制的共存。然而,其不一致的使用和缺乏正式定义值得进一步调查。这个文献计量分析的目的是探讨出版趋势,研究网络,并在混合疼痛文献的关键主题。方法:采用Web of Science核心馆藏进行文献计量学分析。检索于2024年2月进行,期刊排名来自journal Citation Reports™2022 (Clarivate Analytics)。提取的数据包括出版趋势、引文分析、合著者网络和关键词映射。结果:共鉴定出229篇出版物,出版物数量和被引次数均呈上升趋势。大多数研究以研究(77%)和评论文章(19%)的形式发表在高级Q1期刊上。美国(21%)、意大利(15%)和德国(12%)是主要贡献者,但全球合作较弱,除美国以外的合作作者联系有限。关键词分析揭示了五大研究集群,其中“神经性疼痛”、“管理”和“生活质量”成为中心主题。结论:尽管排名靠前的期刊中混合疼痛文章的数量在不断增加,但这一文献计量学分析强调了作者之间缺乏结构良好的合作网络,以及关键词之间缺乏明确的联系。鉴于混合性疼痛的关键临床意义,建议进一步开展高质量的研究并加强国际合作。
{"title":"Trends in Mixed Pain Research Over Three Decades (1993-2024): A Bibliometric Analysis.","authors":"Matteo Luigi Giuseppe Leoni, Marco Mercieri, Roberto Gazzeri, Marco Cascella, Martina Rekatsina, Omar Viswanath, Alberto Pasqualucci, Giustino Varrassi","doi":"10.1007/s11916-025-01371-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11916-025-01371-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The term \"mixed pain\" is frequently used in clinical practice to describe the coexistence of nociceptive, neuropathic, and nociplastic pain mechanisms. However, its inconsistent use and lack of a formal definition warrant further investigation. This bibliometric analysis aims to explore publication trends, research networks, and key themes in mixed pain literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A bibliometric analysis was conducted using the Web of Science Core Collection. The search was performed in February 2024, with journal rankings obtained from Journal Citation Reports™ 2022 (Clarivate Analytics). Extracted data included publication trends, citation analysis, co-authorship networks, and keyword mapping.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 229 publications were identified, demonstrating an increasing trend in both publication volume and citations. Most studies were published in high-ranking Q1 journals as research (77%) and review articles (19%). The USA (21%), Italy (15%), and Germany (12%) were the leading contributors, yet global collaboration was weak, with limited co-authorship connections except within the USA. The keyword analysis revealed five major research clusters, with \"neuropathic pain,\" \"management,\" and \"quality of life\" emerging as central themes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the progressive increase in mixed pain articles in highly ranked journals, this bibliometric analysis highlighted the absence of a well-structured collaborative network among authors and a lack of clear connections between keywords. Given the critical clinical implications of mixed pain, further high-quality studies on this topic and enhanced international collaborations are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":50602,"journal":{"name":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","volume":"29 1","pages":"65"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11923024/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143665179","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ultrasound Guided Genicular Nerve Blocks for Pain Management Following Total Knee Replacement: A Narrative Review. 超声引导膝关节神经阻滞治疗全膝关节置换术后疼痛的研究综述。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-025-01382-3
Alan D Kaye, William C Upshaw, Joseph P Tassin, Jacob M Corrent, James V D'Antoni, Mark V Frolov, Shahab Ahmadzadeh, Hirni Patel, Catherine J Armstrong, Raju Behara, Shilpadevi Patil, Saurabh Kataria, Sahar Shekoohi

Purpose of review: Total knee replacement (TKR) is a common procedure to alleviate pain in patients with severe osteoarthritis of the knee after failed conservative treatment. While generally safe, postoperative pain is a significant issue many patients experience following surgery.

Recent findings: To control postoperative pain, numerous treatments may be administered which may be given preoperatively, intraoperatively, or postoperatively. These treatments include medications such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, and opioids. Additionally, peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) may be performed prior to total knee replacement to limit pain after the surgery. A specific type of PNB done prior to total knee replacement is the genicular nerve block (GNB) which targets five genicular nerves that innervate different parts of the knee joint. This type of block is designed to prevent pain impulses from being sent to the central nervous system from the knee without affecting movement of the lower extremity by sparing efferent nerves innervating muscles. PubMed was used to identify the studies found in this review that are less than 5 years old using the search term "genicular nerve block clinical studies." Most studies compared GNB alone compared to other blocks, however some used GNB in combination with other blocks, most at a maximum of 48 h postoperative. GNB is typically performed by anesthesiologists under ultrasound guidance to ensure accurate placement of the block. Clinical studies have shown that GNB is effective in controlling pain following TKR leading to lower pain scores following surgery as well as a reduced level of opioid consumption. Additionally, GNB has shown reduced motor weakness following TKR compared to other types of PNBs allowing earlier mobilization of patients. However, more studies are needed to further investigate the efficacy of GNB compared to other PNBs to treat postoperative pain following TKR.

审查目的:全膝关节置换术(TKR)是一种常见的手术,可减轻保守治疗失败后严重膝关节骨性关节炎患者的疼痛。虽然总体上是安全的,但术后疼痛是许多患者在手术后经历的一个重要问题:为了控制术后疼痛,可以在术前、术中或术后采取多种治疗方法。这些治疗方法包括非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)、对乙酰氨基酚和阿片类药物等药物。此外,在进行全膝关节置换术前还可能进行周围神经阻滞(PNB),以减轻术后疼痛。在全膝关节置换术前进行的一种特殊外周神经阻滞是膝关节神经阻滞(GNB),它针对支配膝关节不同部位的五条膝关节神经。这种阻滞的目的是通过保护支配肌肉的传出神经,防止疼痛脉冲从膝关节传入中枢神经系统,同时不影响下肢的运动。本综述使用 "膝关节神经阻滞临床研究 "这一搜索关键词,在 PubMed 上查找了 5 年以内的研究。大多数研究将 GNB 单独与其他阻滞进行了比较,但也有一些研究将 GNB 与其他阻滞结合使用,大多数研究在术后 48 小时内进行。GNB 通常由麻醉师在超声波引导下进行,以确保阻滞位置准确。临床研究表明,GNB 可有效控制 TKR 术后疼痛,从而降低术后疼痛评分,并减少阿片类药物的用量。此外,与其他类型的 PNB 相比,GNB 还能减少 TKR 术后的运动无力,使患者更早地康复。不过,与其他 PNB 相比,GNB 在治疗 TKR 术后疼痛方面的疗效还需要更多的研究来进一步探讨。
{"title":"Ultrasound Guided Genicular Nerve Blocks for Pain Management Following Total Knee Replacement: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Alan D Kaye, William C Upshaw, Joseph P Tassin, Jacob M Corrent, James V D'Antoni, Mark V Frolov, Shahab Ahmadzadeh, Hirni Patel, Catherine J Armstrong, Raju Behara, Shilpadevi Patil, Saurabh Kataria, Sahar Shekoohi","doi":"10.1007/s11916-025-01382-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11916-025-01382-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Total knee replacement (TKR) is a common procedure to alleviate pain in patients with severe osteoarthritis of the knee after failed conservative treatment. While generally safe, postoperative pain is a significant issue many patients experience following surgery.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>To control postoperative pain, numerous treatments may be administered which may be given preoperatively, intraoperatively, or postoperatively. These treatments include medications such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, and opioids. Additionally, peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) may be performed prior to total knee replacement to limit pain after the surgery. A specific type of PNB done prior to total knee replacement is the genicular nerve block (GNB) which targets five genicular nerves that innervate different parts of the knee joint. This type of block is designed to prevent pain impulses from being sent to the central nervous system from the knee without affecting movement of the lower extremity by sparing efferent nerves innervating muscles. PubMed was used to identify the studies found in this review that are less than 5 years old using the search term \"genicular nerve block clinical studies.\" Most studies compared GNB alone compared to other blocks, however some used GNB in combination with other blocks, most at a maximum of 48 h postoperative. GNB is typically performed by anesthesiologists under ultrasound guidance to ensure accurate placement of the block. Clinical studies have shown that GNB is effective in controlling pain following TKR leading to lower pain scores following surgery as well as a reduced level of opioid consumption. Additionally, GNB has shown reduced motor weakness following TKR compared to other types of PNBs allowing earlier mobilization of patients. However, more studies are needed to further investigate the efficacy of GNB compared to other PNBs to treat postoperative pain following TKR.</p>","PeriodicalId":50602,"journal":{"name":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","volume":"29 1","pages":"66"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143665228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Current Status and Future Prospects of Intra-articular Injection Therapy for Hip Osteoarthritis: A Review. 髋关节骨关节炎关节内注射治疗的现状及展望
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-025-01378-z
Li Li, Xiaofan Dou, Xueliang Song, Fengxian Wang

Purpose of review: Hip osteoarthritis constitutes a prevalent condition among individuals aged 55 and above, serving as one of the primary triggers for joint discomfort and impairment, and marking a substantial origin of chronic pain particularly affecting the elderly population. Our article provides an exhaustive summary of the mechanisms of action, therapeutic efficacy, and potential adverse consequences associated with novel therapeutic modalities including glucocorticoids, hyaluronic acid, platelet-rich plasma, mesenchymal stem cells, and stromal vascular fraction. Concurrently, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the clinical efficacy and potential applications of various medications.

Recent findings: In comparison to physical therapy, oral analgesics, and other nonsurgical modalities, intra-articular injection therapy is characterized by enhanced safety and greater efficacy. Moreover, when contrasted with surgical intervention, intra-articular injection demonstrates a lower degree of invasiveness and incurs fewer adverse reactions. Intra-articular treatments have shown excellent local efficacy while significantly minimizing adverse reactions in patients. These methods hold significant potential for development but require comprehensive research and thorough discussion within the academic community.

综述目的:髋关节骨性关节炎是55岁及以上人群的一种普遍疾病,是关节不适和损伤的主要诱因之一,也是慢性疼痛的重要来源,尤其是影响老年人的慢性疼痛。我们的文章详尽地总结了与糖皮质激素、透明质酸、富血小板血浆、间充质干细胞和间质血管组分等新型治疗方式相关的作用机制、治疗效果和潜在不良后果。同时,我们对各种药物的临床疗效和潜在应用进行了综合评价。最近的研究发现:与物理治疗、口服镇痛药和其他非手术方式相比,关节内注射治疗具有更强的安全性和更大的疗效。此外,与外科手术相比,关节内注射具有更低的侵入性,不良反应也更少。关节内治疗显示出良好的局部疗效,同时显著减少患者的不良反应。这些方法具有巨大的发展潜力,但需要在学术界进行全面的研究和深入的讨论。
{"title":"The Current Status and Future Prospects of Intra-articular Injection Therapy for Hip Osteoarthritis: A Review.","authors":"Li Li, Xiaofan Dou, Xueliang Song, Fengxian Wang","doi":"10.1007/s11916-025-01378-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11916-025-01378-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Hip osteoarthritis constitutes a prevalent condition among individuals aged 55 and above, serving as one of the primary triggers for joint discomfort and impairment, and marking a substantial origin of chronic pain particularly affecting the elderly population. Our article provides an exhaustive summary of the mechanisms of action, therapeutic efficacy, and potential adverse consequences associated with novel therapeutic modalities including glucocorticoids, hyaluronic acid, platelet-rich plasma, mesenchymal stem cells, and stromal vascular fraction. Concurrently, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the clinical efficacy and potential applications of various medications.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>In comparison to physical therapy, oral analgesics, and other nonsurgical modalities, intra-articular injection therapy is characterized by enhanced safety and greater efficacy. Moreover, when contrasted with surgical intervention, intra-articular injection demonstrates a lower degree of invasiveness and incurs fewer adverse reactions. Intra-articular treatments have shown excellent local efficacy while significantly minimizing adverse reactions in patients. These methods hold significant potential for development but require comprehensive research and thorough discussion within the academic community.</p>","PeriodicalId":50602,"journal":{"name":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","volume":"29 1","pages":"64"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11919992/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143659134","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perioperative Pain Management for Major Limb Amputation - A Systematic-Narrative Hybrid Review. 大肢体截肢围手术期疼痛处理-系统叙述混合回顾。
IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-025-01379-y
Floris V Raasveld, Seamus P Caragher, Nicolas Kumar, Carla H Lehle, Ahish Chitneni, Ian L Valerio, Kyle R Eberlin, David Hao

Introduction: Post-amputation pain, including residual limb pain (RLP) and phantom limb pain (PLP), can affect the outcome of surgery and have an impact on quality of life. Effective management of acute post-amputation pain requires a multidisciplinary approach with collaboration among the surgical and anesthesia teams to optimize pain management. A systematic-narrative hybrid review was conducted to assess and report the effectiveness of various interventions in perioperative pain management for amputation surgery.

Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for studies evaluating interventional and/or pharmacological approaches to managing perioperative pain in major extremity amputation surgery. The data collected included treatment options, average dosage and/or duration of treatments, and reported pain outcomes.

Results: Of the 27 studies evaluating interventions, 8 addressed neuraxial or perineural analgesia, 16 focused on peripheral nerve blocks (PNB), 2 examined peripheral nerve stimulators (PNS), and 1 investigated transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Preoperative epidural analgesia was associated with a reduced incidence of postoperative pain. PNS, PNB, and catheter-based infusions were found to be effective in managing postoperative pain. The role of ketamine in treating post-amputation pain yielded mixed results, while other pharmacological agents, such as valproic acid and gabapentin, demonstrated limited efficacy.

Conclusions: While numerous pain interventions are available, no single approach has been shown to be superior. A multimodal strategy, incorporating PNBs, preoperative pain control, and potentially ketamine, appears to provide the most comprehensive pain management strategy. Further long-term prospective studies are required to refine and optimize pain management techniques for major extremity amputation surgery.

Level of evidence: III-Systematic reviews.

截肢后疼痛,包括残肢痛(RLP)和幻肢痛(PLP),可以影响手术的结果,并影响生活质量。急性截肢后疼痛的有效管理需要多学科的方法,外科和麻醉团队之间的合作,以优化疼痛管理。我们进行了一项系统叙述的混合回顾,以评估和报告各种干预措施在截肢手术围手术期疼痛管理中的有效性。方法:检索MEDLINE、Embase、CENTRAL和ClinicalTrials.gov数据库,以评估介入和/或药理学方法对大肢截肢手术围手术期疼痛的控制。收集的数据包括治疗方案、平均剂量和/或治疗持续时间,以及报告的疼痛结果。结果:在27项评估干预措施的研究中,8项研究涉及轴向或神经周围镇痛,16项研究关注周围神经阻滞(PNB), 2项研究周围神经刺激器(PNS), 1项研究经皮神经电刺激。术前硬膜外镇痛与术后疼痛发生率降低相关。PNS、PNB和导管输注均可有效控制术后疼痛。氯胺酮在治疗截肢后疼痛中的作用产生了不同的结果,而其他药物,如丙戊酸和加巴喷丁,疗效有限。结论:虽然有许多疼痛干预措施可用,但没有一种方法被证明是优越的。多模式策略,包括pnb,术前疼痛控制,以及潜在的氯胺酮,似乎提供了最全面的疼痛管理策略。需要进一步的长期前瞻性研究来完善和优化大肢截肢手术的疼痛管理技术。证据等级:iii级-系统评价。
{"title":"Perioperative Pain Management for Major Limb Amputation - A Systematic-Narrative Hybrid Review.","authors":"Floris V Raasveld, Seamus P Caragher, Nicolas Kumar, Carla H Lehle, Ahish Chitneni, Ian L Valerio, Kyle R Eberlin, David Hao","doi":"10.1007/s11916-025-01379-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11916-025-01379-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Post-amputation pain, including residual limb pain (RLP) and phantom limb pain (PLP), can affect the outcome of surgery and have an impact on quality of life. Effective management of acute post-amputation pain requires a multidisciplinary approach with collaboration among the surgical and anesthesia teams to optimize pain management. A systematic-narrative hybrid review was conducted to assess and report the effectiveness of various interventions in perioperative pain management for amputation surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for studies evaluating interventional and/or pharmacological approaches to managing perioperative pain in major extremity amputation surgery. The data collected included treatment options, average dosage and/or duration of treatments, and reported pain outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 27 studies evaluating interventions, 8 addressed neuraxial or perineural analgesia, 16 focused on peripheral nerve blocks (PNB), 2 examined peripheral nerve stimulators (PNS), and 1 investigated transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Preoperative epidural analgesia was associated with a reduced incidence of postoperative pain. PNS, PNB, and catheter-based infusions were found to be effective in managing postoperative pain. The role of ketamine in treating post-amputation pain yielded mixed results, while other pharmacological agents, such as valproic acid and gabapentin, demonstrated limited efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While numerous pain interventions are available, no single approach has been shown to be superior. A multimodal strategy, incorporating PNBs, preoperative pain control, and potentially ketamine, appears to provide the most comprehensive pain management strategy. Further long-term prospective studies are required to refine and optimize pain management techniques for major extremity amputation surgery.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III-Systematic reviews.</p>","PeriodicalId":50602,"journal":{"name":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","volume":"29 1","pages":"62"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143651639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Current Pain and Headache Reports
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1