Pub Date : 2024-03-01Epub Date: 2023-11-03DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000001017
Viviana Barquet-Pizá, Carla J Siegfried
Purpose of review: Increased prevalence, earlier onset, and more rapid progression to vision loss from glaucoma has demonstrated racial disparity in numerous studies over decades. Precise etiologies of these important differences among patients of African and Hispanic ancestral background have not been elucidated. This review focuses on currently available epidemiologic/population, genetic, socioeconomic and physiologic studies of racial disparities in this blinding disease.
Recent findings: In depth reviews of several landmark studies of glaucoma prevalence in various racial groups have highlighted potential challenges of lack of recruitment of diverse populations in genetic studies and clinical trials, challenges of racial stratification of subjects, and the impact of socioeconomic variables.
Summary: Through a more comprehensive analysis of racial disparities of glaucoma, both clinicians and researchers may provide more effective population screening and management with a holistic approach for individualized patient care to provide improved outcomes. Future studies of interventions in sociodemographic factors and genetic/physiologic variables that influence the prevalence, access, and consequential vision loss from glaucoma will be crucial to minimize/eliminate racial disparities and improve outcomes for all.
{"title":"Understanding racial disparities of glaucoma.","authors":"Viviana Barquet-Pizá, Carla J Siegfried","doi":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001017","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001017","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Increased prevalence, earlier onset, and more rapid progression to vision loss from glaucoma has demonstrated racial disparity in numerous studies over decades. Precise etiologies of these important differences among patients of African and Hispanic ancestral background have not been elucidated. This review focuses on currently available epidemiologic/population, genetic, socioeconomic and physiologic studies of racial disparities in this blinding disease.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>In depth reviews of several landmark studies of glaucoma prevalence in various racial groups have highlighted potential challenges of lack of recruitment of diverse populations in genetic studies and clinical trials, challenges of racial stratification of subjects, and the impact of socioeconomic variables.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Through a more comprehensive analysis of racial disparities of glaucoma, both clinicians and researchers may provide more effective population screening and management with a holistic approach for individualized patient care to provide improved outcomes. Future studies of interventions in sociodemographic factors and genetic/physiologic variables that influence the prevalence, access, and consequential vision loss from glaucoma will be crucial to minimize/eliminate racial disparities and improve outcomes for all.</p>","PeriodicalId":50604,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71434828","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2023-10-10DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000845
Sagar B Patel, Jeffrey S Heier, Varun Chaudhary, Charles C Wykoff
Purpose of review: Geographic atrophy is an advanced and currently untreatable form of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), which leads to significant compromise of visual function and quality of life. Dysregulation of the complement cascade has been directly implicated in AMD pathogenesis. Pegcetacoplan is a pegylated highly selective bicyclic peptide that inhibits the cleavage of complement component 3 (C3), which represents a key step in propagation of the complement cascade. The phase 2 FILLY trial as well as the phase 3 OAKS and DERBY trials have evaluated the safety and efficacy of pegcetacoplan for the treatment of GA.
Recent findings: The FILLY, OAKS and DERBY trials have demonstrated that local inhibition of C3 cleavage with pegcetacoplan can reduce geographic atrophy lesion growth compared with sham with an effect size of approximately 11-35% depending on the specific trial and specific geographic atrophy phenotype considered. Overall pegcetacoplan has appeared to be well tolerated with the notable side effect of a dose-dependent increase in the rate of exudative AMD development in treated eyes.
Summary: The FILLY, OAKS and DERBY trials have demonstrated that pegcetacoplan is a potentially viable treatment for geographic atrophy. Additional data from the 2-year outcomes of DERBY and OAKS as well as data from the ongoing 3-year GALE extension study will provide additional insights into the potential therapeutic benefit of pegcetacoplan. Future studies assessing complement inhibition at earlier stages of AMD, with the goal of preventing geographic atrophy formation, are warranted.
{"title":"Treatment of geographic atrophy: an update on data related to pegcetacoplan.","authors":"Sagar B Patel, Jeffrey S Heier, Varun Chaudhary, Charles C Wykoff","doi":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000000845","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000000845","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Geographic atrophy is an advanced and currently untreatable form of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), which leads to significant compromise of visual function and quality of life. Dysregulation of the complement cascade has been directly implicated in AMD pathogenesis. Pegcetacoplan is a pegylated highly selective bicyclic peptide that inhibits the cleavage of complement component 3 (C3), which represents a key step in propagation of the complement cascade. The phase 2 FILLY trial as well as the phase 3 OAKS and DERBY trials have evaluated the safety and efficacy of pegcetacoplan for the treatment of GA.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The FILLY, OAKS and DERBY trials have demonstrated that local inhibition of C3 cleavage with pegcetacoplan can reduce geographic atrophy lesion growth compared with sham with an effect size of approximately 11-35% depending on the specific trial and specific geographic atrophy phenotype considered. Overall pegcetacoplan has appeared to be well tolerated with the notable side effect of a dose-dependent increase in the rate of exudative AMD development in treated eyes.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The FILLY, OAKS and DERBY trials have demonstrated that pegcetacoplan is a potentially viable treatment for geographic atrophy. Additional data from the 2-year outcomes of DERBY and OAKS as well as data from the ongoing 3-year GALE extension study will provide additional insights into the potential therapeutic benefit of pegcetacoplan. Future studies assessing complement inhibition at earlier stages of AMD, with the goal of preventing geographic atrophy formation, are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":50604,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41184081","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2023-12-07DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000001008
Alexander C Lieu, Natalie A Afshari
{"title":"Patient experiences and satisfaction with cataract surgery.","authors":"Alexander C Lieu, Natalie A Afshari","doi":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001008","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001008","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50604,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139933994","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2023-10-11DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000001004
Daniel E Savage, Seth M Pantanelli
Purpose of review: There is an ever-growing body of research regarding intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). This review intends to summarize recent data and offer updated recommendations.
Recent findings: Postmyopic LASIK/PRK eyes have the best refractive outcomes when multiple methods are averaged, or when Barrett True-K is used. Posthyperopic LASIK/PRK eyes also seem to do best when Barrett True-K is used, but with more variable results. With both aforementioned methods, using measured total corneal power incrementally improves results. For post-SMILE eyes, the first nontheoretical data favors raytracing.
Summary: Refractive outcomes after cataract surgery in eyes with prior laser refractive surgery are less accurate and more variable compared to virgin eyes. Surgeons may simplify their approach to IOL power calculations in postmyopic and posthyperopic LASIK/PRK by using Barrett True-K, and employing measured total corneal power when available. For post-SMILE eyes, ray tracing seems to work well, but lack of accessibility may hamper its adoption.
{"title":"An update on intraocular lens power calculations in eyes with previous laser refractive surgery.","authors":"Daniel E Savage, Seth M Pantanelli","doi":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001004","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>There is an ever-growing body of research regarding intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). This review intends to summarize recent data and offer updated recommendations.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Postmyopic LASIK/PRK eyes have the best refractive outcomes when multiple methods are averaged, or when Barrett True-K is used. Posthyperopic LASIK/PRK eyes also seem to do best when Barrett True-K is used, but with more variable results. With both aforementioned methods, using measured total corneal power incrementally improves results. For post-SMILE eyes, the first nontheoretical data favors raytracing.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Refractive outcomes after cataract surgery in eyes with prior laser refractive surgery are less accurate and more variable compared to virgin eyes. Surgeons may simplify their approach to IOL power calculations in postmyopic and posthyperopic LASIK/PRK by using Barrett True-K, and employing measured total corneal power when available. For post-SMILE eyes, ray tracing seems to work well, but lack of accessibility may hamper its adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":50604,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41219258","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2023-10-25DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000001010
Alexander C Lieu, Jong Hwa Jun, Natalie A Afshari
Purpose of review: We summarize evidence-based considerations regarding the use of intracameral antibiotics during cataract surgery.
Recent findings: The use of intraoperative intracameral antibiotics reduced the incidence of postcataract surgery endophthalmitis 3.5-fold, with an odds ratio ranging from 0.14 to 0.19. A survey of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery showed usage of intracameral injections of antibiotics increased by 16% in the United States between 2014 and 2021. The frequency of vancomycin usage has sharply dropped to 6%, while moxifloxacin is now the dominant choice at 83% among respondents. One analysis showed that 2500 patients need to be treated with intracameral antibiotics to prevent one case of endophthalmitis. A 500 μg intracameral moxifloxacin at $22 dollars per dose is cost-effective, including for patients with posterior capsular rupture (PCR).
Summary: Studies substantiate the safety and efficacy of intracameral antibiotics for endophthalmitis prophylaxis. Intracameral moxifloxacin and cefuroxime are the most common choices. While vancomycin shows potential for efficacy, further studies evaluating clinical outcomes are needed. Adverse events are rare and commonly due to errors in preparation. Topical antibiotics do not provide additional prophylactic benefits to intracameral regimens. Intracameral antibiotics given alone are cost-effective.
{"title":"Intracameral antibiotics during cataract surgery: efficacy, safety, and cost-benefit considerations.","authors":"Alexander C Lieu, Jong Hwa Jun, Natalie A Afshari","doi":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001010","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001010","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>We summarize evidence-based considerations regarding the use of intracameral antibiotics during cataract surgery.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The use of intraoperative intracameral antibiotics reduced the incidence of postcataract surgery endophthalmitis 3.5-fold, with an odds ratio ranging from 0.14 to 0.19. A survey of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery showed usage of intracameral injections of antibiotics increased by 16% in the United States between 2014 and 2021. The frequency of vancomycin usage has sharply dropped to 6%, while moxifloxacin is now the dominant choice at 83% among respondents. One analysis showed that 2500 patients need to be treated with intracameral antibiotics to prevent one case of endophthalmitis. A 500 μg intracameral moxifloxacin at $22 dollars per dose is cost-effective, including for patients with posterior capsular rupture (PCR).</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Studies substantiate the safety and efficacy of intracameral antibiotics for endophthalmitis prophylaxis. Intracameral moxifloxacin and cefuroxime are the most common choices. While vancomycin shows potential for efficacy, further studies evaluating clinical outcomes are needed. Adverse events are rare and commonly due to errors in preparation. Topical antibiotics do not provide additional prophylactic benefits to intracameral regimens. Intracameral antibiotics given alone are cost-effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":50604,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50159196","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2023-11-02DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000001015
Jong Hwa Jun, Alexander Lieu, Natalie A Afshari
Purpose of review: Light adjustable intraocular lens (LAL) is a promising concept in cataract surgery. This review explores considerations for the use of LALs.
Recent findings: Through updates, the safety of LALs and light delivery devices have been enhanced, enabling more efficient treatment with lower ultraviolet (UV) energy. Preoperative topography and aberration are essential for understanding indications for LALs. Furthermore, when determining intraocular lens power, it is crucial to factor in potential postoperative myopia or hyperopic adjustments. This is achieved by establishing a proper postimplantation refractive target and considering potential wavefront changes. Postoperative adjustments for defocus and astigmatism have demonstrated excellent outcomes. Monovision strategy by adjustable blended vision of LALs revealed distance vision of 20/20 along with near vision of J2 in 96% of patients. However, the results of clinical studies on postrefractive cataract surgery showed contrasting outcomes at distance, indicating the need for further research results regarding its effectiveness. A new postoperative workflow needs to be designed to enable a systematic follow-up process.
Summary: LALs are safe and demonstrate promising refractive outcomes. To achieve appropriate results, understanding the changes in optical characteristics associated with adjustment and constructing a new postoperative workflow are necessary.
{"title":"Light adjustable intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: considerations.","authors":"Jong Hwa Jun, Alexander Lieu, Natalie A Afshari","doi":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001015","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Light adjustable intraocular lens (LAL) is a promising concept in cataract surgery. This review explores considerations for the use of LALs.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Through updates, the safety of LALs and light delivery devices have been enhanced, enabling more efficient treatment with lower ultraviolet (UV) energy. Preoperative topography and aberration are essential for understanding indications for LALs. Furthermore, when determining intraocular lens power, it is crucial to factor in potential postoperative myopia or hyperopic adjustments. This is achieved by establishing a proper postimplantation refractive target and considering potential wavefront changes. Postoperative adjustments for defocus and astigmatism have demonstrated excellent outcomes. Monovision strategy by adjustable blended vision of LALs revealed distance vision of 20/20 along with near vision of J2 in 96% of patients. However, the results of clinical studies on postrefractive cataract surgery showed contrasting outcomes at distance, indicating the need for further research results regarding its effectiveness. A new postoperative workflow needs to be designed to enable a systematic follow-up process.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>LALs are safe and demonstrate promising refractive outcomes. To achieve appropriate results, understanding the changes in optical characteristics associated with adjustment and constructing a new postoperative workflow are necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":50604,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71428709","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2023-10-13DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000989
Nailyn Rasool
Purpose of review: Whipple's disease is an infectious cause of uveitis that may present with nonspecific findings of intraocular inflammation, which can precede the development of neurologic symptoms and signs. Whipple's disease, then, may evade consideration in the differential diagnosis for uveitis.
Recent findings: Molecular tests can be helpful in identifying the presence of Tropheryma whipplei from ocular specimens. The application of metagenomic sequencing for ocular specimens is promising, as it offers the opportunity to identify the pathogen when suspicion for an intraocular infection is high. Whipple's disease demonstrates the ability to abrogate the host immune response, which gives some insight into its pathogenesis.
Summary: Whipple's disease should be suspected in patients who have uveitis refractory to anti-inflammatory therapy. Knowledge of this important pathogen can help direct the timely implementation of diagnostic testing.
{"title":"Ophthalmic manifestations of Whipple's disease.","authors":"Nailyn Rasool","doi":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000000989","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000000989","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Whipple's disease is an infectious cause of uveitis that may present with nonspecific findings of intraocular inflammation, which can precede the development of neurologic symptoms and signs. Whipple's disease, then, may evade consideration in the differential diagnosis for uveitis.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Molecular tests can be helpful in identifying the presence of Tropheryma whipplei from ocular specimens. The application of metagenomic sequencing for ocular specimens is promising, as it offers the opportunity to identify the pathogen when suspicion for an intraocular infection is high. Whipple's disease demonstrates the ability to abrogate the host immune response, which gives some insight into its pathogenesis.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Whipple's disease should be suspected in patients who have uveitis refractory to anti-inflammatory therapy. Knowledge of this important pathogen can help direct the timely implementation of diagnostic testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":50604,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41219259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2023-11-14DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000001005
Rhea Narang, Ashvin Agarwal
Purpose of review: The aim of this study to provide an overview of recent publications and opinions in refractive cataract surgery.
Recent findings: With the advent of intraocular lenses (IOLs) on different platforms, the surgeon has a wide arena of types of IOL to choose, depending on the patient's visual requirement. Optimization of the tear film, integrating tomography and topography devices for appropriate keratometry values, biometry, use of advanced formulas for IOL power calculation and application of newer IOLs can help achieve target refraction in cases scheduled for cataract surgery. Intraoperative aberrometry can be a useful aid for cataract surgery in postrefractive cases and can help minimize residual postoperative astigmatism.
Summary: Evolvement and rapid advancement of technology allows to impart desired refractive outcomes in most of the cases postcataract surgery. Appropriate preoperative and intraoperative factors should be considered to achieve the desired postoperative outcome.
{"title":"Refractive cataract surgery.","authors":"Rhea Narang, Ashvin Agarwal","doi":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001005","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The aim of this study to provide an overview of recent publications and opinions in refractive cataract surgery.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>With the advent of intraocular lenses (IOLs) on different platforms, the surgeon has a wide arena of types of IOL to choose, depending on the patient's visual requirement. Optimization of the tear film, integrating tomography and topography devices for appropriate keratometry values, biometry, use of advanced formulas for IOL power calculation and application of newer IOLs can help achieve target refraction in cases scheduled for cataract surgery. Intraoperative aberrometry can be a useful aid for cataract surgery in postrefractive cases and can help minimize residual postoperative astigmatism.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Evolvement and rapid advancement of technology allows to impart desired refractive outcomes in most of the cases postcataract surgery. Appropriate preoperative and intraoperative factors should be considered to achieve the desired postoperative outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":50604,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"92157249","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2023-11-14DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000001006
Darren S J Ting, Damien Gatinel, Marcus Ang
Purpose of review: Corneal refractive surgery (CRS) is one of the most popular eye procedures, with more than 40 million cases performed globally. As CRS-treated patients age and develop cataract, the number of cases that require additional preoperative considerations and management will increase around the world. Thus, we provide an up-to-date, concise overview of the considerations and outcomes of cataract surgery in eyes with previous CRS, including surface ablation, laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
Recent findings: Challenges associated with accurate biometry in eyes with CRS have been mitigated recently through total keratometry, ray tracing, intraoperative aberrometry, and machine learning assisted intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas to improve prediction. Emerging studies have highlighted the superior performance of ray tracing and/or total keratometry-based formulas for IOL power calculation in eyes with previous SMILE. Dry eye remains a common side effect after cataract surgery, especially in eyes with CRS, though the risk appears to be lower after SMILE than LASIK (in the short-term). Recent presbyopia-correcting IOL designs such as extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOLs may be suitable in carefully selected eyes with previous CRS.
Summary: Ophthalmologists will increasingly face challenges associated with the surgical management of cataract in patients with prior CRS. Careful preoperative assessment of the ocular surface, appropriate use of IOL power calculation formulas, and strategies for presbyopia correction are key to achieve good clinical and refractive outcomes and patient satisfaction. Recent advances in CRS techniques, such as SMILE, may pose new challenges for such eyes in the future.
{"title":"Cataract surgery after corneal refractive surgery: preoperative considerations and management.","authors":"Darren S J Ting, Damien Gatinel, Marcus Ang","doi":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001006","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Corneal refractive surgery (CRS) is one of the most popular eye procedures, with more than 40 million cases performed globally. As CRS-treated patients age and develop cataract, the number of cases that require additional preoperative considerations and management will increase around the world. Thus, we provide an up-to-date, concise overview of the considerations and outcomes of cataract surgery in eyes with previous CRS, including surface ablation, laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Challenges associated with accurate biometry in eyes with CRS have been mitigated recently through total keratometry, ray tracing, intraoperative aberrometry, and machine learning assisted intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas to improve prediction. Emerging studies have highlighted the superior performance of ray tracing and/or total keratometry-based formulas for IOL power calculation in eyes with previous SMILE. Dry eye remains a common side effect after cataract surgery, especially in eyes with CRS, though the risk appears to be lower after SMILE than LASIK (in the short-term). Recent presbyopia-correcting IOL designs such as extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOLs may be suitable in carefully selected eyes with previous CRS.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Ophthalmologists will increasingly face challenges associated with the surgical management of cataract in patients with prior CRS. Careful preoperative assessment of the ocular surface, appropriate use of IOL power calculation formulas, and strategies for presbyopia correction are key to achieve good clinical and refractive outcomes and patient satisfaction. Recent advances in CRS techniques, such as SMILE, may pose new challenges for such eyes in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":50604,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"92157248","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2023-11-01DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000001013
Matthew De la Paz, Linda M Tsai
Purpose of review: Options for addressing presbyopia with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation have become more varied and sophisticated. We reviewed recent literature on multifocal and extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOLs in order to provide insight on their respective advantages, with emphasis on the visual outcomes of each design.
Recent findings: Increased patient age, spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) abnormalities, abnormal optical axis measurements, and better preoperative visual acuity have been implicated as predictors of worse postoperative vision or visual quality in multifocal IOLs. Despite differences in objective outcomes, patient-reported outcomes such as satisfaction are consistently similar between multifocal and EDOF IOLs. EDOFs may have slightly lower rates of spectacle independence than trifocals, but there is more support for their use in the setting of with other ocular conditions.
Summary: Multifocal and EDOF IOLs are both viable options for patients who wish to preserve near vision. Given their similar objective performance in many aspects, enabling patients to make informed decisions based on their expectations and visual requirements is critical to postoperative satisfaction. Evidence for advanced technology IOL implantation in pediatric patients remains inconclusive.
{"title":"Outcomes and predictive factors in multifocal and extended depth of focus intraocular lens implantation.","authors":"Matthew De la Paz, Linda M Tsai","doi":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001013","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Options for addressing presbyopia with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation have become more varied and sophisticated. We reviewed recent literature on multifocal and extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOLs in order to provide insight on their respective advantages, with emphasis on the visual outcomes of each design.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Increased patient age, spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) abnormalities, abnormal optical axis measurements, and better preoperative visual acuity have been implicated as predictors of worse postoperative vision or visual quality in multifocal IOLs. Despite differences in objective outcomes, patient-reported outcomes such as satisfaction are consistently similar between multifocal and EDOF IOLs. EDOFs may have slightly lower rates of spectacle independence than trifocals, but there is more support for their use in the setting of with other ocular conditions.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Multifocal and EDOF IOLs are both viable options for patients who wish to preserve near vision. Given their similar objective performance in many aspects, enabling patients to make informed decisions based on their expectations and visual requirements is critical to postoperative satisfaction. Evidence for advanced technology IOL implantation in pediatric patients remains inconclusive.</p>","PeriodicalId":50604,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71428710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}