Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2024-10-28DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000001100
Naomi E Gutkind, Steven J Gedde
Purpose of review: This review presents guidelines for designing studies and reporting efficacy and safety outcomes in minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) research.
Recent findings: Adherence to reporting guidelines in MIGS studies is crucial for providers and patients to appraise surgical options. Recent guidelines have outlined appropriate methodology, efficacy outcomes, and safety reporting, so that study results are presented in an interpretable and uniform manner.
Summary: MIGS are changing the glaucoma treatment paradigm by offering safer, less invasive alternatives to traditional filtering surgery. However, inconsistent reporting of outcomes in MIGS trials hampers comparison and clinical decision-making. Recent guidelines have aimed to highlight appropriate methodology and encourage standardization in reporting outcomes to improve the quality of MIGS literature. Key considerations include defining baseline intraocular pressure, reporting standardized demographic data, using consistent endpoints, presenting standardized figures, evaluating medication use, and documenting adverse events. By adhering to these guidelines, MIGS trials can offer clearer insights into surgical outcomes, aiding both surgeons and patients in treatment decisions.
{"title":"Reporting outcomes of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery.","authors":"Naomi E Gutkind, Steven J Gedde","doi":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001100","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001100","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review presents guidelines for designing studies and reporting efficacy and safety outcomes in minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) research.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Adherence to reporting guidelines in MIGS studies is crucial for providers and patients to appraise surgical options. Recent guidelines have outlined appropriate methodology, efficacy outcomes, and safety reporting, so that study results are presented in an interpretable and uniform manner.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>MIGS are changing the glaucoma treatment paradigm by offering safer, less invasive alternatives to traditional filtering surgery. However, inconsistent reporting of outcomes in MIGS trials hampers comparison and clinical decision-making. Recent guidelines have aimed to highlight appropriate methodology and encourage standardization in reporting outcomes to improve the quality of MIGS literature. Key considerations include defining baseline intraocular pressure, reporting standardized demographic data, using consistent endpoints, presenting standardized figures, evaluating medication use, and documenting adverse events. By adhering to these guidelines, MIGS trials can offer clearer insights into surgical outcomes, aiding both surgeons and patients in treatment decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50604,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"140-145"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142523531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2024-11-13DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000001108
Seng Chee Loon, Bryan Chin Hou Ang, Andrew White
Purpose of review: The introduction of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) has changed the surgical landscape of glaucoma surgery. For more than four decades, the most commonly performed glaucoma surgery around the world has been the trabeculectomy. This article examines whether trabeculectomy is still the predominant procedure in glaucoma today, in the context of rapidly emerging MIGS devices and procedures.
Recent findings: There is a growing trend of mild to moderate glaucoma cases undergoing MIGS procedures instead of trabeculectomy. Glaucoma drainage device implantation may also have taken away a significant share of the filtering surgery performed for more severe glaucoma. In addition, the availability and economics of implants has an influence on the prevalence of trabeculectomy.
Summary: Currently, trabeculectomy surgery is still the most common glaucoma surgery performed around the world. However, the proportion of glaucoma surgeries undergoing MIGS is increasing rapidly.
{"title":"Is minimally invasive glaucoma surgery killing trabeculectomies?","authors":"Seng Chee Loon, Bryan Chin Hou Ang, Andrew White","doi":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001108","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001108","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The introduction of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) has changed the surgical landscape of glaucoma surgery. For more than four decades, the most commonly performed glaucoma surgery around the world has been the trabeculectomy. This article examines whether trabeculectomy is still the predominant procedure in glaucoma today, in the context of rapidly emerging MIGS devices and procedures.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>There is a growing trend of mild to moderate glaucoma cases undergoing MIGS procedures instead of trabeculectomy. Glaucoma drainage device implantation may also have taken away a significant share of the filtering surgery performed for more severe glaucoma. In addition, the availability and economics of implants has an influence on the prevalence of trabeculectomy.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Currently, trabeculectomy surgery is still the most common glaucoma surgery performed around the world. However, the proportion of glaucoma surgeries undergoing MIGS is increasing rapidly.</p>","PeriodicalId":50604,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"146-151"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142958352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2024-12-18DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000001117
Nicole Shu-Wen Chan, Chelvin C A Sng
Purpose of review: This review discusses the evidence on the efficacy, safety and role of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) in eyes with angle closure glaucoma. While cataract surgery remains the most established surgical treatment for primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG), the intraocular pressure (IOP) may remain elevated after cataract surgery despite open angles due to trabecular meshwork damage from chronic iridotrabecular contact.
Recent findings: There is emerging evidence that combining cataract surgery with MIGS in eyes with PACG, though an off-label indication for some MIGS devices, can achieve greater IOP and glaucoma medication reduction than cataract surgery alone.
Summary: Trabecular bypass MIGS procedures and less destructive forms of ciliary body treatment have been shown to be effective in PACG and are safer alternatives to traditional incisional surgeries. Evidence for the use of subconjunctival MIGS and suprachoroidal MIGS in angle closure eyes is lacking at present, and further investigation is indicated.
{"title":"Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery in angle closure.","authors":"Nicole Shu-Wen Chan, Chelvin C A Sng","doi":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001117","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001117","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review discusses the evidence on the efficacy, safety and role of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) in eyes with angle closure glaucoma. While cataract surgery remains the most established surgical treatment for primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG), the intraocular pressure (IOP) may remain elevated after cataract surgery despite open angles due to trabecular meshwork damage from chronic iridotrabecular contact.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>There is emerging evidence that combining cataract surgery with MIGS in eyes with PACG, though an off-label indication for some MIGS devices, can achieve greater IOP and glaucoma medication reduction than cataract surgery alone.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Trabecular bypass MIGS procedures and less destructive forms of ciliary body treatment have been shown to be effective in PACG and are safer alternatives to traditional incisional surgeries. Evidence for the use of subconjunctival MIGS and suprachoroidal MIGS in angle closure eyes is lacking at present, and further investigation is indicated.</p>","PeriodicalId":50604,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"152-158"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142856519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2024-11-20DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000001113
Laura E Barna, In Young Chung, Lucy Q Shen
{"title":"Clinical pearls from glaucoma clinical trials: a case-based approach.","authors":"Laura E Barna, In Young Chung, Lucy Q Shen","doi":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001113","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001113","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50604,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"99-106"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142958350","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-11-04DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000001091
Mertcan Sevgi, Eden Ruffell, Fares Antaki, Mark A Chia, Pearse A Keane
Purpose of review: Last year marked the development of the first foundation model in ophthalmology, RETFound, setting the stage for generalizable medical artificial intelligence (GMAI) that can adapt to novel tasks. Additionally, rapid advancements in large language model (LLM) technology, including models such as GPT-4 and Gemini, have been tailored for medical specialization and evaluated on clinical scenarios with promising results. This review explores the opportunities and challenges for further advancements in these technologies.
Recent findings: RETFound outperforms traditional deep learning models in specific tasks, even when only fine-tuned on small datasets. Additionally, LMMs like Med-Gemini and Medprompt GPT-4 perform better than out-of-the-box models for ophthalmology tasks. However, there is still a significant deficiency in ophthalmology-specific multimodal models. This gap is primarily due to the substantial computational resources required to train these models and the limitations of high-quality ophthalmology datasets.
Summary: Overall, foundation models in ophthalmology present promising opportunities but face challenges, particularly the need for high-quality, standardized datasets for training and specialization. Although development has primarily focused on large language and vision models, the greatest opportunities lie in advancing large multimodal models, which can more closely mimic the capabilities of clinicians.
{"title":"Foundation models in ophthalmology: opportunities and challenges.","authors":"Mertcan Sevgi, Eden Ruffell, Fares Antaki, Mark A Chia, Pearse A Keane","doi":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001091","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001091","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Last year marked the development of the first foundation model in ophthalmology, RETFound, setting the stage for generalizable medical artificial intelligence (GMAI) that can adapt to novel tasks. Additionally, rapid advancements in large language model (LLM) technology, including models such as GPT-4 and Gemini, have been tailored for medical specialization and evaluated on clinical scenarios with promising results. This review explores the opportunities and challenges for further advancements in these technologies.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>RETFound outperforms traditional deep learning models in specific tasks, even when only fine-tuned on small datasets. Additionally, LMMs like Med-Gemini and Medprompt GPT-4 perform better than out-of-the-box models for ophthalmology tasks. However, there is still a significant deficiency in ophthalmology-specific multimodal models. This gap is primarily due to the substantial computational resources required to train these models and the limitations of high-quality ophthalmology datasets.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Overall, foundation models in ophthalmology present promising opportunities but face challenges, particularly the need for high-quality, standardized datasets for training and specialization. Although development has primarily focused on large language and vision models, the greatest opportunities lie in advancing large multimodal models, which can more closely mimic the capabilities of clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":50604,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"90-98"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11620320/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142331709","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-09-25DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000001092
Hassan Hashemi, Faezeh Fayaz, Alireza Hashemi, Mehdi Khabazkhoob
Purpose of review: The objective of this review article is to ascertain the global distribution of cataract surgery and evaluate the extent of its coverage in recent years.
Recent findings: The cataract surgical rate (CSR) has been reported from 36 to 12 800 (per million population) across different countries. The average cataract surgical coverage (CSC) in the majority of countries was around 50% or lower. Additionally, in many countries, the efficient CSC (eCSC) deviates from the CSC, emphasizing the importance of attention to the quality of surgical procedures. Socioeconomic status and access to health services are key determinants in the distribution of cataract surgery. This procedure is more prevalent among older individuals, with a higher incidence among men and private insurances tend to cover a larger portion of cataract surgeries. The pandemic of COVID-19 has had a detrimental effect on cataract surgery rates in numerous countries.
Summary: The rate of cataract surgery and its extent of coverage in certain countries is inadequate. The primary factor influencing the quantity and coverage of cataract surgeries is the economic status of the countries. Additionally, government support through insurance and the provision of appropriate healthcare services can contribute to an increase in cataract surgeries.
{"title":"Global prevalence of cataract surgery.","authors":"Hassan Hashemi, Faezeh Fayaz, Alireza Hashemi, Mehdi Khabazkhoob","doi":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001092","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001092","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The objective of this review article is to ascertain the global distribution of cataract surgery and evaluate the extent of its coverage in recent years.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The cataract surgical rate (CSR) has been reported from 36 to 12 800 (per million population) across different countries. The average cataract surgical coverage (CSC) in the majority of countries was around 50% or lower. Additionally, in many countries, the efficient CSC (eCSC) deviates from the CSC, emphasizing the importance of attention to the quality of surgical procedures. Socioeconomic status and access to health services are key determinants in the distribution of cataract surgery. This procedure is more prevalent among older individuals, with a higher incidence among men and private insurances tend to cover a larger portion of cataract surgeries. The pandemic of COVID-19 has had a detrimental effect on cataract surgery rates in numerous countries.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The rate of cataract surgery and its extent of coverage in certain countries is inadequate. The primary factor influencing the quantity and coverage of cataract surgeries is the economic status of the countries. Additionally, government support through insurance and the provision of appropriate healthcare services can contribute to an increase in cataract surgeries.</p>","PeriodicalId":50604,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","volume":"36 1","pages":"10-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142786378","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-12-05DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000001099
Bryanna J Lee, Natalie A Afshari
{"title":"The global burden of blindness.","authors":"Bryanna J Lee, Natalie A Afshari","doi":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001099","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001099","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50604,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","volume":"36 1","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142786611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-11-08DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000001109
Lilla Simon, Brian A Murillo, Alfonso L Sabater
Purpose of review: Artificial tears play a critical role in the management of dry eye disease (DED), providing patient symptomatic relief and improving ocular surface health. Its clinical importance has driven pharmaceutical innovation in terms of its formula and ingredients. The following article is an overview of the artificial tear products on the market.
Recent findings: The artificial tears on the market vary in terms of their active ingredients, inactive ingredients, preservatives, and formulation. The particular chemical composition of ingredients and formulation plays a clinical role in treating ocular pathology. Conversely, certain ingredients can cause more ocular damage than other ingredients.
Summary: Upon review of the artificial tears on the market, the authors conclude that clinicians should consider the products' composition when designating a treatment for DED. Different artificial tear composition may benefit specific causes of DED such as evaporative, aqueous-deficient, glaucoma, ocular surface tumors, corneal ulcers, and viral conjunctivitis.
{"title":"A comprehensive update on over the counter artificial tears.","authors":"Lilla Simon, Brian A Murillo, Alfonso L Sabater","doi":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001109","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001109","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Artificial tears play a critical role in the management of dry eye disease (DED), providing patient symptomatic relief and improving ocular surface health. Its clinical importance has driven pharmaceutical innovation in terms of its formula and ingredients. The following article is an overview of the artificial tear products on the market.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The artificial tears on the market vary in terms of their active ingredients, inactive ingredients, preservatives, and formulation. The particular chemical composition of ingredients and formulation plays a clinical role in treating ocular pathology. Conversely, certain ingredients can cause more ocular damage than other ingredients.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Upon review of the artificial tears on the market, the authors conclude that clinicians should consider the products' composition when designating a treatment for DED. Different artificial tear composition may benefit specific causes of DED such as evaporative, aqueous-deficient, glaucoma, ocular surface tumors, corneal ulcers, and viral conjunctivitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":50604,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"76-82"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142607459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-10-23DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000001101
Yousef A Fouad, Sam Karimaghaei, Abdelrahman M Elhusseiny, Ahmed R Alagorie, Andrew D Brown, Ahmed B Sallam
Purpose of review: Pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (PCME) is the most common postoperative complication of cataract surgery, resulting in visual decline. In this review, we discuss its pathophysiology, epidemiology, clinical presentation, and the current available evidence on therapeutic management.
Recent findings: Patients with diabetes mellitus have twice the risk of developing PCME as compared to nondiabetic individuals. Recent large database studies have revealed an increased risk among young, male, and black patients. A previous history of PCME is perhaps the strongest risk factor for fellow eye involvement.
Summary: PCME generally occurs around 6 weeks postoperatively and is likely a consequence of postoperative inflammation with disruption of the blood-queous and blood-retina barriers. Optical coherence tomography of the macula servers as a key diagnostic tool. There is a lack of large controlled clinical trials to guide treatment approaches. We recommend a stepwise approach for PCME that includes observation if not visually significant versus treatment with topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and steroids if symptomatic. Refractory cases can be treated with a periocular steroid injection, followed by intravitreal steroids if still nonresponsive.
{"title":"Pseudophakic cystoid macular edema.","authors":"Yousef A Fouad, Sam Karimaghaei, Abdelrahman M Elhusseiny, Ahmed R Alagorie, Andrew D Brown, Ahmed B Sallam","doi":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001101","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001101","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (PCME) is the most common postoperative complication of cataract surgery, resulting in visual decline. In this review, we discuss its pathophysiology, epidemiology, clinical presentation, and the current available evidence on therapeutic management.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Patients with diabetes mellitus have twice the risk of developing PCME as compared to nondiabetic individuals. Recent large database studies have revealed an increased risk among young, male, and black patients. A previous history of PCME is perhaps the strongest risk factor for fellow eye involvement.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>PCME generally occurs around 6 weeks postoperatively and is likely a consequence of postoperative inflammation with disruption of the blood-queous and blood-retina barriers. Optical coherence tomography of the macula servers as a key diagnostic tool. There is a lack of large controlled clinical trials to guide treatment approaches. We recommend a stepwise approach for PCME that includes observation if not visually significant versus treatment with topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and steroids if symptomatic. Refractory cases can be treated with a periocular steroid injection, followed by intravitreal steroids if still nonresponsive.</p>","PeriodicalId":50604,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"62-69"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142512328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-10-23DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000001095
Andrzej Grzybowski, Gerd U Auffarth, Benjamin R LaHood
Purpose of review: This review summarizes the evidence on the effect of intraocular lens (IOL) material on the outcomes of cataract surgery, as well as on the surgical procedure itself.
Recent findings: Differences in capsular biocompatibility between IOL materials lead to variations in capsular stability and posterior capsule opacification (PCO), while differences in uveal biocompatibility affect postoperative inflammatory response.
Summary: Refractive outcomes are affected by both incision size and the rotational stability of toric IOLs. Small incision sizes favour hydrophilic IOLs. Rotational stability of hydrophobic and hydrophilic IOLs were comparable in recent studies. Visual outcomes are affected by chromatic aberrations, dysphotopsia, lens opacifications and PCO. Hydrophilic IOLs are associated with reduced chromatic dispersion. Hydrophobic IOL opacifications are caused by sub-surface glistenings, while hydrophilic IOL opacifications are due to surface calcifications. Some surgeries, including pars plana vitrectomy and lamellar corneal transplants, were shown to increase the risk of IOL calcifications, although the mechanism is still unknown. Hydrophilic IOLs have greater ease of manipulation, greater resistance to IOL damage, and higher uveal biocompatibility. Hydrophobic IOLs show better PCO prevention than hydrophilic IOLs, and should be preferred in highly myopic eyes where Nd:YAG capsulotomy might increase the risk of retinal detachment.
{"title":"How do intraocular lens materials influence the outcome of cataract surgery?","authors":"Andrzej Grzybowski, Gerd U Auffarth, Benjamin R LaHood","doi":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001095","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001095","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review summarizes the evidence on the effect of intraocular lens (IOL) material on the outcomes of cataract surgery, as well as on the surgical procedure itself.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Differences in capsular biocompatibility between IOL materials lead to variations in capsular stability and posterior capsule opacification (PCO), while differences in uveal biocompatibility affect postoperative inflammatory response.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Refractive outcomes are affected by both incision size and the rotational stability of toric IOLs. Small incision sizes favour hydrophilic IOLs. Rotational stability of hydrophobic and hydrophilic IOLs were comparable in recent studies. Visual outcomes are affected by chromatic aberrations, dysphotopsia, lens opacifications and PCO. Hydrophilic IOLs are associated with reduced chromatic dispersion. Hydrophobic IOL opacifications are caused by sub-surface glistenings, while hydrophilic IOL opacifications are due to surface calcifications. Some surgeries, including pars plana vitrectomy and lamellar corneal transplants, were shown to increase the risk of IOL calcifications, although the mechanism is still unknown. Hydrophilic IOLs have greater ease of manipulation, greater resistance to IOL damage, and higher uveal biocompatibility. Hydrophobic IOLs show better PCO prevention than hydrophilic IOLs, and should be preferred in highly myopic eyes where Nd:YAG capsulotomy might increase the risk of retinal detachment.</p>","PeriodicalId":50604,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"18-24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11620326/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142512326","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}