首页 > 最新文献

Current Opinion in Anesthesiology最新文献

英文 中文
Perioperative care of patients with recent stroke undergoing nonemergent, nonneurological, noncardiac, nonvascular surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 对近期接受非急诊、非神经、非心脏、非血管手术的中风患者的围手术期护理:系统综述和荟萃分析。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-10 DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001403
Abhijit V Lele, Elizabeth Olive Moreton, Jayashree Sundararajan, Samuel Neal Blacker

Purpose of review: To systematically review and perform a meta-analysis of published literature regarding postoperative stroke and mortality in patients with a history of stroke and to provide a framework for preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative care in an elective setting.

Recent findings: Patients with nonneurological, noncardiac, and nonvascular surgery within three months after stroke have a 153-fold risk, those within 6 months have a 50-fold risk, and those within 12 months have a 20-fold risk of postoperative stroke. There is a 12-fold risk of in-hospital mortality within three months and a three-to-four-fold risk of mortality for more than 12 months after stroke. The risk of stroke and mortality continues to persist years after stroke. Recurrent stroke is common in patients in whom anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy is discontinued. Stroke and time elapsed after stroke should be included in the preoperative assessment questionnaire, and a stroke-specific risk assessment should be performed before surgical planning is pursued.

Summary: In patients with a history of a recent stroke, anesthesiology, surgery, and neurology experts should create a shared mental model in which the patient/surrogate decision-maker is informed about the risks and benefits of the proposed surgical procedure; secondary-stroke-prevention medications are reviewed; plans are made for interruptions and resumption; and intraoperative care is individualized to reduce the likelihood of postoperative stroke or death.

综述目的:系统回顾和荟萃分析已发表的有关卒中病史患者术后卒中和死亡率的文献,为择期手术的术前、术中和术后护理提供框架:最近的研究结果:中风后 3 个月内接受非神经、非心脏和非血管手术的患者术后中风的风险为 153 倍,6 个月内的患者术后中风的风险为 50 倍,12 个月内的患者术后中风的风险为 20 倍。中风后三个月内的院内死亡风险为 12 倍,中风后 12 个月以上的死亡风险为 3-4 倍。中风和死亡风险在中风后数年仍持续存在。停用抗凝/抗血小板治疗的患者常见中风复发。术前评估问卷中应包括卒中和卒中后的时间,在制定手术计划前应进行卒中特异性风险评估。小结:对于近期有卒中病史的患者,麻醉科、外科和神经内科专家应建立一个共享的心理模型,让患者/代理决策者了解拟议手术的风险和益处;审查二级卒中预防药物;制定中断和恢复计划;术中护理个体化,以降低术后卒中或死亡的可能性。
{"title":"Perioperative care of patients with recent stroke undergoing nonemergent, nonneurological, noncardiac, nonvascular surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Abhijit V Lele, Elizabeth Olive Moreton, Jayashree Sundararajan, Samuel Neal Blacker","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001403","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001403","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To systematically review and perform a meta-analysis of published literature regarding postoperative stroke and mortality in patients with a history of stroke and to provide a framework for preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative care in an elective setting.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Patients with nonneurological, noncardiac, and nonvascular surgery within three months after stroke have a 153-fold risk, those within 6 months have a 50-fold risk, and those within 12 months have a 20-fold risk of postoperative stroke. There is a 12-fold risk of in-hospital mortality within three months and a three-to-four-fold risk of mortality for more than 12 months after stroke. The risk of stroke and mortality continues to persist years after stroke. Recurrent stroke is common in patients in whom anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy is discontinued. Stroke and time elapsed after stroke should be included in the preoperative assessment questionnaire, and a stroke-specific risk assessment should be performed before surgical planning is pursued.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>In patients with a history of a recent stroke, anesthesiology, surgery, and neurology experts should create a shared mental model in which the patient/surrogate decision-maker is informed about the risks and benefits of the proposed surgical procedure; secondary-stroke-prevention medications are reviewed; plans are made for interruptions and resumption; and intraoperative care is individualized to reduce the likelihood of postoperative stroke or death.</p>","PeriodicalId":50609,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141621668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Opioid alternatives in spine surgeries. 脊柱手术中的阿片类药物替代品。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-06 DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001423
Shobana Rajan, Gaiha Rishi, Marco Ibrahim

Purpose of review: The escalating opioid crisis has intensified the need to explore alternative pain management strategies for patients undergoing spine surgery. This review is timely and relevant as it synthesizes recent research on opioid alternatives for perioperative management, assessing their efficacy, side effects, and postoperative outcomes.

Recent findings: A systematic search was conducted to capture articles from the past 18 months that examined opioid-sparing strategies. Findings indicate that multimodal analgesia, incorporating nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, lidocaine, gabapentinoids, N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists, dexmedetomidine, and emerging regional block techniques like the erector spinae block and TLIF (thoraco lumbar interfascial block), can significantly reduce opioid consumption without compromising pain relief. Additionally, these approaches reduce opioid-related side effects such as postoperative nausea, vomiting, and prolonged hospital stays.

Summary: The use of multimodal analgesia aligns with current pain management guidelines and addresses public health concerns related to opioid misuse. While effective, these alternatives are not without side effects, and the ultimate outcome depends on balancing benefits and risks. Future research should focus on the long-term outcomes of opioid alternatives, their effectiveness across diverse populations, and further validation and optimization of these strategies.

审查目的:不断升级的阿片类药物危机加剧了为脊柱手术患者探索其他疼痛治疗策略的必要性。这篇综述综述了围手术期阿片类药物替代治疗的最新研究,评估了其疗效、副作用和术后效果,因此非常及时且具有现实意义:最近的研究结果:我们进行了一次系统性检索,以获取过去 18 个月内研究阿片类药物替代策略的文章。研究结果表明,结合非甾体类抗炎药(NSAIDs)、对乙酰氨基酚、利多卡因、加巴喷丁类、N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)拮抗剂、右美托咪定以及新出现的区域阻滞技术(如竖脊肌阻滞和TLIF(胸腰椎筋膜间阻滞))的多模式镇痛可以在不影响疼痛缓解的情况下显著减少阿片类药物的用量。此外,这些方法还能减少与阿片类药物相关的副作用,如术后恶心、呕吐和住院时间延长等。摘要:多模式镇痛的使用符合当前的疼痛管理指南,并能解决与阿片类药物滥用相关的公共卫生问题。这些替代方法虽然有效,但并非没有副作用,最终结果取决于效益与风险之间的平衡。未来的研究应重点关注阿片类药物替代品的长期疗效、在不同人群中的有效性,以及这些策略的进一步验证和优化。
{"title":"Opioid alternatives in spine surgeries.","authors":"Shobana Rajan, Gaiha Rishi, Marco Ibrahim","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001423","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001423","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The escalating opioid crisis has intensified the need to explore alternative pain management strategies for patients undergoing spine surgery. This review is timely and relevant as it synthesizes recent research on opioid alternatives for perioperative management, assessing their efficacy, side effects, and postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>A systematic search was conducted to capture articles from the past 18 months that examined opioid-sparing strategies. Findings indicate that multimodal analgesia, incorporating nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, lidocaine, gabapentinoids, N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists, dexmedetomidine, and emerging regional block techniques like the erector spinae block and TLIF (thoraco lumbar interfascial block), can significantly reduce opioid consumption without compromising pain relief. Additionally, these approaches reduce opioid-related side effects such as postoperative nausea, vomiting, and prolonged hospital stays.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The use of multimodal analgesia aligns with current pain management guidelines and addresses public health concerns related to opioid misuse. While effective, these alternatives are not without side effects, and the ultimate outcome depends on balancing benefits and risks. Future research should focus on the long-term outcomes of opioid alternatives, their effectiveness across diverse populations, and further validation and optimization of these strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50609,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141983809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pharmacokinetics in regional anesthesia. 区域麻醉的药代动力学。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-12 DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001398
André M Leite-Moreira, André Correia, Nuno Vale, Joana B Mourão

Purpose of review: Pharmacokinetics of local anesthetics are one of the main determinants of success and safety of regional anesthesia and comprise local and systemic distribution phases. This review aims to summarize the latest research findings on this topic in the context of various regional blocks performed for different surgeries and patient populations.

Recent findings: Research into local kinetics and systemic absorption of local anesthetics has chiefly been focused on novel fascial plane blocks, especially the erector spinae plane block, as these are increasingly adopted for regional anesthesia and pain management. As their clinical efficacy is very dependent on injection of large volumes of local anesthetic, doses over typically recommended limits are often administered.

Summary: Fascial plane blocks are the regional anesthesia techniques in need of the most pharmacokinetic characterization, not only to better understand their complex mechanisms of action but also to avoid harm from excessive doses of local anesthetics. Further mapping of risk factors for systemic toxicity from administration in different block sites is crucial. Extremes of age and pregnancy are vulnerable patient populations but in whom regional anesthesia, including novel techniques, has been performed with few complications.

综述的目的:局麻药的药代动力学是区域麻醉成功和安全的主要决定因素之一,包括局部和全身分布阶段。本综述旨在总结针对不同手术和患者群体实施的各种区域阻滞在这方面的最新研究成果:对局麻药的局部动力学和全身吸收的研究主要集中在新型筋膜平面阻滞,尤其是竖脊平面阻滞,因为这些阻滞越来越多地被用于区域麻醉和疼痛治疗。由于其临床疗效在很大程度上取决于大量局麻药的注射,因此注射剂量往往超过通常建议的限度:筋膜平面阻滞是最需要进行药代动力学特征描述的区域麻醉技术,这不仅是为了更好地了解其复杂的作用机制,也是为了避免过量使用局麻药造成伤害。进一步摸清在不同阻滞部位用药导致全身中毒的风险因素至关重要。极端年龄段和妊娠期的患者是易感人群,但在对他们进行区域麻醉(包括新型技术)时,并发症很少。
{"title":"Pharmacokinetics in regional anesthesia.","authors":"André M Leite-Moreira, André Correia, Nuno Vale, Joana B Mourão","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001398","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001398","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Pharmacokinetics of local anesthetics are one of the main determinants of success and safety of regional anesthesia and comprise local and systemic distribution phases. This review aims to summarize the latest research findings on this topic in the context of various regional blocks performed for different surgeries and patient populations.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Research into local kinetics and systemic absorption of local anesthetics has chiefly been focused on novel fascial plane blocks, especially the erector spinae plane block, as these are increasingly adopted for regional anesthesia and pain management. As their clinical efficacy is very dependent on injection of large volumes of local anesthetic, doses over typically recommended limits are often administered.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Fascial plane blocks are the regional anesthesia techniques in need of the most pharmacokinetic characterization, not only to better understand their complex mechanisms of action but also to avoid harm from excessive doses of local anesthetics. Further mapping of risk factors for systemic toxicity from administration in different block sites is crucial. Extremes of age and pregnancy are vulnerable patient populations but in whom regional anesthesia, including novel techniques, has been performed with few complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":50609,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141621669","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Current concepts and targets for preventing the transition of acute to chronic postsurgical pain. 预防手术后急性疼痛向慢性疼痛转变的当前概念和目标。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-31 DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001424
Adeeb Oweidat, Hari Kalagara, Rakesh V Sondekoppam

Purpose of review: It is estimated that approximately a third of patients undergoing certain surgeries may report some degree of persistent pain postoperatively. Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) reduces quality of life, is challenging to treat, and has significant socio-economic impact.

Recent findings: From an epidemiological perspective, factors that predispose patients to the development of CPSP may be considered in relation to the patient, the procedure or, the care environment. Prevention or management of transition from acute to chronic pain often need a multidisciplinary approach beginning early in the preoperative period and continuing beyond surgical admission. The current concepts regarding the role of central and peripheral nervous systems in chronification of pain may provide targets for future therapies but, the current evidence seems to suggest that a multimodal analgesic approach of preventive analgesia along with a continued follow-up and treatment after hospital discharge may hold the key to identify and manage the transitioning of acute to chronic pain.

Summary: A comprehensive multidisciplinary approach with prior identification of risk factors, minimizing the surgical insult and a culture of utilizing multimodal analgesia and continued surveillance beyond the period of hospitalization is an important step towards reducing the development of chronic pain. A transitional pain service model may accomplish many of these goals.

审查目的:据估计,在接受某些手术的患者中,约有三分之一的人在术后会出现某种程度的持续疼痛。慢性术后疼痛(CPSP)会降低患者的生活质量,治疗难度大,并对社会经济产生重大影响:从流行病学的角度来看,导致患者发生 CPSP 的因素可能与患者、手术或护理环境有关。预防或处理从急性疼痛到慢性疼痛的转变通常需要多学科方法,从术前早期开始,一直持续到手术入院之后。目前关于中枢和外周神经系统在疼痛慢性化中的作用的概念可能为未来的治疗提供了目标,但目前的证据似乎表明,预防性镇痛的多模式镇痛方法以及出院后的持续跟踪和治疗可能是识别和管理急性疼痛向慢性疼痛过渡的关键。小结:采用多学科综合方法,事先识别风险因素,尽量减少手术损伤,培养使用多模式镇痛和住院后持续监测的文化,是减少慢性疼痛发展的重要一步。过渡性疼痛服务模式可以实现上述许多目标。
{"title":"Current concepts and targets for preventing the transition of acute to chronic postsurgical pain.","authors":"Adeeb Oweidat, Hari Kalagara, Rakesh V Sondekoppam","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001424","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001424","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>It is estimated that approximately a third of patients undergoing certain surgeries may report some degree of persistent pain postoperatively. Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) reduces quality of life, is challenging to treat, and has significant socio-economic impact.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>From an epidemiological perspective, factors that predispose patients to the development of CPSP may be considered in relation to the patient, the procedure or, the care environment. Prevention or management of transition from acute to chronic pain often need a multidisciplinary approach beginning early in the preoperative period and continuing beyond surgical admission. The current concepts regarding the role of central and peripheral nervous systems in chronification of pain may provide targets for future therapies but, the current evidence seems to suggest that a multimodal analgesic approach of preventive analgesia along with a continued follow-up and treatment after hospital discharge may hold the key to identify and manage the transitioning of acute to chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>A comprehensive multidisciplinary approach with prior identification of risk factors, minimizing the surgical insult and a culture of utilizing multimodal analgesia and continued surveillance beyond the period of hospitalization is an important step towards reducing the development of chronic pain. A transitional pain service model may accomplish many of these goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":50609,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141861451","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Anesthesia for traumatic brain injury. 脑外伤麻醉。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-04 DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001404
Nys Willem Siebers, Luzius A Steiner

Purpose of review: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) presents complex clinical challenges, requiring a nuanced understanding of its pathophysiology and current management principles to improve patient outcomes. Anesthetists play a critical role in care and need to stay updated with recent evidence and trends to ensure high-quality treatment. The Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines, last updated in 2016, have shown moderate adherence, and much of the current management relies on expert opinions. This literature review synthesizes the current evidence and provides insights into the role of anesthetists in TBI management.

Recent findings: Recent literature has emphasized the importance of tailored anesthetic management principles in treating TBI, focusing on minimizing secondary brain injury during neurosurgical interventions or extracranial surgery. Emerging trends include individualized intracranial pressure approaches and multimodal neuromonitoring for comprehensive assessment of cerebral physiology.

Summary: Anesthesia for TBI patients requires a comprehensive approach that balances anesthetic goals with the unique pathophysiological factors of brain injury. Despite recent research expanding our understanding, challenges remain in standardizing protocols and addressing individual patient response variability. Adherence to established management principles, personalized approaches, and ongoing research is crucial for improving the outcomes.

审查目的:创伤性脑损伤 (TBI) 带来了复杂的临床挑战,需要对其病理生理学和当前的管理原则有细致入微的了解,以改善患者的预后。麻醉师在护理中发挥着关键作用,需要随时了解最新证据和趋势,以确保高质量的治疗。脑外伤基金会指南》最近一次更新是在 2016 年,其遵守情况一般,目前的管理大多依赖于专家意见。本文献综述综合了当前的证据,并对麻醉师在 TBI 管理中的作用提出了见解:最近的文献强调了量身定制的麻醉管理原则在治疗创伤性脑损伤中的重要性,重点是在神经外科干预或颅外手术中尽量减少继发性脑损伤。新趋势包括个体化颅内压方法和多模态神经监测,以全面评估脑生理学。摘要:TBI 患者的麻醉需要一种综合方法,以平衡麻醉目标和脑损伤的独特病理生理因素。尽管最近的研究拓展了我们的认识,但在标准化方案和解决患者个体反应差异方面仍存在挑战。坚持既定的管理原则、个性化的方法和持续的研究对改善结果至关重要。
{"title":"Anesthesia for traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Nys Willem Siebers, Luzius A Steiner","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001404","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001404","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) presents complex clinical challenges, requiring a nuanced understanding of its pathophysiology and current management principles to improve patient outcomes. Anesthetists play a critical role in care and need to stay updated with recent evidence and trends to ensure high-quality treatment. The Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines, last updated in 2016, have shown moderate adherence, and much of the current management relies on expert opinions. This literature review synthesizes the current evidence and provides insights into the role of anesthetists in TBI management.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent literature has emphasized the importance of tailored anesthetic management principles in treating TBI, focusing on minimizing secondary brain injury during neurosurgical interventions or extracranial surgery. Emerging trends include individualized intracranial pressure approaches and multimodal neuromonitoring for comprehensive assessment of cerebral physiology.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Anesthesia for TBI patients requires a comprehensive approach that balances anesthetic goals with the unique pathophysiological factors of brain injury. Despite recent research expanding our understanding, challenges remain in standardizing protocols and addressing individual patient response variability. Adherence to established management principles, personalized approaches, and ongoing research is crucial for improving the outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50609,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141621660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Keeping patients in the dark: perioperative anesthetic considerations for patients receiving 5-aminolevulinic acid for glioma resection. 让患者蒙在鼓里:接受 5-氨基乙酰丙酸治疗胶质瘤切除术的患者围手术期麻醉注意事项。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-12 DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001406
Benish Fatima, Lauren K Licatino, Arnoley S Abcejo

Purpose of review: 5-Aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride (5-ALA), available under the trade name Gleolan, is an orally administered fluorophore drug used to enhance visual differentiation of cancerous tissue from healthy tissue, primarily during surgical resection of high-grade gliomas. Although given preoperatively, 5-ALA has important implications for anesthetic care throughout the perioperative period. This article reviews pharmacology, safety concerns, and perioperative considerations for patients who receive oral 5-ALA.

Recent findings: Although approved for clinical use by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 2017, studies and case reports published since then have further delineated side effects of this medication and its mechanisms and pharmacokinetics.

Summary: Mitigating the possible side effects of 5-ALA requires an understanding of its basic mechanism as well as focused perioperative planning and communication. Administration of this medication may result in nausea, vomiting, photosensitivity, increase in serum concentration of liver enzymes, and hypotension. Patients who receive 5-ALA must be protected from prolonged light exposure during the first 48 h after consumption and administration of other photosensitizing agents should be avoided (Supplemental Video File/Video abstract).

审查目的:5-Aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride(5-ALA),商品名为 Gleolan,是一种口服荧光剂药物,主要用于在高级别胶质瘤手术切除过程中,增强癌组织与健康组织的视觉分辨能力。虽然 5-ALA 在术前给药,但它对整个围手术期的麻醉护理具有重要影响。本文回顾了接受口服 5-ALA 的患者的药理学、安全性问题和围术期注意事项:尽管美国食品和药物管理局于 2017 年批准该药物用于临床,但此后发表的研究和病例报告进一步阐明了该药物的副作用及其机制和药代动力学。摘要:减轻 5-ALA 可能产生的副作用需要了解其基本机制,并进行有针对性的围术期规划和沟通。使用这种药物可能会导致恶心和呕吐、光敏感性、肝酶血清浓度升高和低血压。接受 5-ALA 治疗的患者在用药后的 48 小时内必须避免长时间暴露在光线下,并应避免使用其他光敏性药物(补充视频文件/视频摘要)。
{"title":"Keeping patients in the dark: perioperative anesthetic considerations for patients receiving 5-aminolevulinic acid for glioma resection.","authors":"Benish Fatima, Lauren K Licatino, Arnoley S Abcejo","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001406","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001406","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>5-Aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride (5-ALA), available under the trade name Gleolan, is an orally administered fluorophore drug used to enhance visual differentiation of cancerous tissue from healthy tissue, primarily during surgical resection of high-grade gliomas. Although given preoperatively, 5-ALA has important implications for anesthetic care throughout the perioperative period. This article reviews pharmacology, safety concerns, and perioperative considerations for patients who receive oral 5-ALA.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Although approved for clinical use by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 2017, studies and case reports published since then have further delineated side effects of this medication and its mechanisms and pharmacokinetics.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Mitigating the possible side effects of 5-ALA requires an understanding of its basic mechanism as well as focused perioperative planning and communication. Administration of this medication may result in nausea, vomiting, photosensitivity, increase in serum concentration of liver enzymes, and hypotension. Patients who receive 5-ALA must be protected from prolonged light exposure during the first 48 h after consumption and administration of other photosensitizing agents should be avoided (Supplemental Video File/Video abstract).</p>","PeriodicalId":50609,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141621662","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Postoperative pain management after abdominal transplantations. 腹腔移植术后疼痛管理。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-21 DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001389
Boris Tufegdzic, Clara Lobo, Arun Kumar

Purpose of review: The aim of this review article is to present current recommendations as well as knowledge gaps and controversies pertaining to commonly utilized postoperative pain management after solid organ transplantation in the abdominal cavity.

Recent findings: Postsurgical pain has been identified as one of the major challenges in recovery and treatment after solid organ transplants. Many perioperative interventions and management strategies are available for reducing and managing postoperative pain. Management should be tailored to the individual needs, taking an interdisciplinary and holistic approach and following enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines. Many centers currently utilize peripheral and neuraxial blocks during transplantation surgery, but these techniques are far from standardized practices. The utilization of these procedures is often dependent on transplantation centers' historical methods and perioperative cultures.

Summary: The optimal pain management regimen has not yet been definitively established, and current scientific evidence does not yet support the endorsement of a certain analgesic approach. This objective necessitates the need for high-quality randomized controlled trials.

综述的目的:这篇综述文章旨在介绍当前的建议以及与腹腔内实体器官移植术后常用疼痛治疗方法有关的知识差距和争议:手术后疼痛已被确定为实体器官移植术后恢复和治疗的主要挑战之一。许多围手术期干预和管理策略可用于减轻和控制术后疼痛。应根据个人需求进行管理,采取跨学科的整体方法,并遵循加强术后恢复的指导原则。目前,许多中心在移植手术中使用外周阻滞和神经阻滞,但这些技术远未实现标准化。摘要:最佳疼痛治疗方案尚未明确确立,目前的科学证据也不支持采用某种镇痛方法。因此有必要进行高质量的随机对照试验。
{"title":"Postoperative pain management after abdominal transplantations.","authors":"Boris Tufegdzic, Clara Lobo, Arun Kumar","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001389","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001389","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The aim of this review article is to present current recommendations as well as knowledge gaps and controversies pertaining to commonly utilized postoperative pain management after solid organ transplantation in the abdominal cavity.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Postsurgical pain has been identified as one of the major challenges in recovery and treatment after solid organ transplants. Many perioperative interventions and management strategies are available for reducing and managing postoperative pain. Management should be tailored to the individual needs, taking an interdisciplinary and holistic approach and following enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines. Many centers currently utilize peripheral and neuraxial blocks during transplantation surgery, but these techniques are far from standardized practices. The utilization of these procedures is often dependent on transplantation centers' historical methods and perioperative cultures.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The optimal pain management regimen has not yet been definitively established, and current scientific evidence does not yet support the endorsement of a certain analgesic approach. This objective necessitates the need for high-quality randomized controlled trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":50609,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141263510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Neurologic disease in the obstetric patient. 产科病人的神经系统疾病。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-11 DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001405
Konstantin Inozemtsev, Evelyn Yeh, Ned F Nasr

Purpose of review: Neurologic disorders and complications during pregnancy are common, but guidelines and data are sparse. This review aims to give an overview of recent developments in neuroanesthesia and management of neuropathology during pregnancy, with the hope that these may fill the gaps in current guidelines and recommendations, as well as their implications for an anesthetic approach.

Recent findings: Neuraxial and general anesthesia are safe in multiple sclerosis and myasthenia gravis, though neuromuscular blockade response is unpredictable and risk for exacerbation exists. Cerebral vascular pathology is common and carries a significant morbidity and mortality burden, but thrombolytic and endovascular therapies are often appropriate and safe. Instrumental vaginal delivery can minimize intracranial pressure shifts and is a viable option. Tumors and cerebral malformations require a complex multidisciplinary and anesthetic approach.

Summary: While clinical trials remain sparse, larger population-based studies offer insight into the optimal approach to the parturient with neurologic disease.

审查目的:妊娠期神经系统疾病和并发症很常见,但相关指南和数据却很少。本综述旨在概述神经麻醉和妊娠期神经病理管理的最新进展,希望这些进展能填补现行指南和建议中的空白,并说明其对麻醉方法的影响:最新研究结果:神经轴麻醉和全身麻醉对多发性硬化症和重症肌无力是安全的,但神经肌肉阻滞反应是不可预测的,存在病情加重的风险。脑血管病变很常见,发病率和死亡率都很高,但溶栓和血管内治疗通常是适当和安全的。器械性阴道分娩可以最大程度地减少颅内压的改变,是一种可行的选择。肿瘤和脑畸形需要复杂的多学科和麻醉方法。总结:虽然临床试验仍然稀少,但基于人群的大型研究为神经系统疾病的产妇提供了最佳方法。
{"title":"Neurologic disease in the obstetric patient.","authors":"Konstantin Inozemtsev, Evelyn Yeh, Ned F Nasr","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001405","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001405","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Neurologic disorders and complications during pregnancy are common, but guidelines and data are sparse. This review aims to give an overview of recent developments in neuroanesthesia and management of neuropathology during pregnancy, with the hope that these may fill the gaps in current guidelines and recommendations, as well as their implications for an anesthetic approach.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Neuraxial and general anesthesia are safe in multiple sclerosis and myasthenia gravis, though neuromuscular blockade response is unpredictable and risk for exacerbation exists. Cerebral vascular pathology is common and carries a significant morbidity and mortality burden, but thrombolytic and endovascular therapies are often appropriate and safe. Instrumental vaginal delivery can minimize intracranial pressure shifts and is a viable option. Tumors and cerebral malformations require a complex multidisciplinary and anesthetic approach.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>While clinical trials remain sparse, larger population-based studies offer insight into the optimal approach to the parturient with neurologic disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":50609,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141621665","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Optimizing peripheral regional anaesthesia: strategies for single shot and continuous blocks. 优化外周区域麻醉:单次阻滞和连续阻滞的策略。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-24 DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001407
David Johnstone, Alasdair Taylor, Jenny Ferry

Purpose of review: Regional anaesthesia is increasingly prominent within anaesthesia, offering alternative analgesic options amidst concerns over opioid-based analgesia. Since Halsted's initial description, the field has burgeoned, with ultrasound visualization revolutionizing local anaesthetic spread assessment, leading to the development of numerous novel techniques. The benefits of regional anaesthesia have gained increasing evidence to support their application, leading to changes within training curricula. Consequently, regional anaesthesia is at a defining moment, embracing the development of core skills for the general anaesthesiologist, whilst also continuing the advancement of the specialty.

Recent findings: Recent priority setting projects have focussed attention on key aspects of regional anaesthesia delivery, including pain management, conduct and efficacy, education, and technological innovation. Developments in our current understanding of anatomy and pharmacology, combined with strategies for optimizing the conduct and maximizing efficacy of techniques, minimizing complications, and enhancing outcomes are explored. In addition, advancements in education and training methodologies and the integration of progress in novel technologies will be reviewed.

Summary: This review highlights recent scientific advances in optimizing both single-shot and continuous peripheral regional anaesthesia techniques. By synthesizing these developments, this review offers valuable insights into the evolving landscape of regional anaesthesia, aiming to improve clinical practice and patient care.

审查目的:区域麻醉在麻醉中的地位日益突出,在人们对阿片类镇痛的担忧中提供了替代性镇痛选择。自 Halsted 首次描述以来,该领域已蓬勃发展,超声可视化技术彻底改变了局麻药扩散评估,并开发出许多新技术。区域麻醉的益处已获得越来越多的证据支持,导致培训课程发生变化。因此,区域麻醉正处于一个决定性的时刻,既要发展普通麻醉医师的核心技能,又要继续推进该专业的发展:最近的研究结果:最近的优先事项设定项目将注意力集中在区域麻醉实施的关键方面,包括疼痛管理、行为和疗效、教育和技术创新。项目探讨了我们目前对解剖学和药理学认识的发展,以及优化技术操作、最大限度地提高技术效果、减少并发症和提高疗效的策略。此外,还将对教育和培训方法的进步以及新技术的整合进展进行综述。通过综合这些进展,本综述为区域麻醉不断发展的前景提供了有价值的见解,旨在改善临床实践和患者护理。
{"title":"Optimizing peripheral regional anaesthesia: strategies for single shot and continuous blocks.","authors":"David Johnstone, Alasdair Taylor, Jenny Ferry","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001407","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001407","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Regional anaesthesia is increasingly prominent within anaesthesia, offering alternative analgesic options amidst concerns over opioid-based analgesia. Since Halsted's initial description, the field has burgeoned, with ultrasound visualization revolutionizing local anaesthetic spread assessment, leading to the development of numerous novel techniques. The benefits of regional anaesthesia have gained increasing evidence to support their application, leading to changes within training curricula. Consequently, regional anaesthesia is at a defining moment, embracing the development of core skills for the general anaesthesiologist, whilst also continuing the advancement of the specialty.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent priority setting projects have focussed attention on key aspects of regional anaesthesia delivery, including pain management, conduct and efficacy, education, and technological innovation. Developments in our current understanding of anatomy and pharmacology, combined with strategies for optimizing the conduct and maximizing efficacy of techniques, minimizing complications, and enhancing outcomes are explored. In addition, advancements in education and training methodologies and the integration of progress in novel technologies will be reviewed.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This review highlights recent scientific advances in optimizing both single-shot and continuous peripheral regional anaesthesia techniques. By synthesizing these developments, this review offers valuable insights into the evolving landscape of regional anaesthesia, aiming to improve clinical practice and patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50609,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141621667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fascial plane blocks: from microanatomy to clinical applications. 筋膜平面阻滞:从微观解剖到临床应用。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-05 DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001416
Carmelo Pirri, Debora Emanuela Torre, Carla Stecco

Purpose of review: In the last 20 years, advancements in the understanding of fasciae have significantly transformed anaesthesia and surgery. Fascial plane blocks (FPBs) have gained popularity due to their validated safety profile and relative ease. They are used in various clinical settings for surgical and nonsurgical indications. Growing evidence suggests a link between the microscopic anatomy of fasciae and their mechanism of action. As a result, knowledge of these aspects is urgently needed to better optimise pain management. The purpose of this review is to summarise the different microscopic aspects of deep/muscular fascia to expand our understanding in the performance of FPBs.

Recent findings: There is ample evidence to support the role of FPBs in pain management. However, the exact mechanism of action remains unclear. Fasciae are composed of various structural elements and display complex anatomical characteristics at the microscopic level. They include various cell types embedded within an extracellular matrix abundant in collagens and hyaluronan. Increasingly, numerous studies demonstrated their innervation that contributes to their sensory functions and their role in proprioception, motor coordination and pain perception. Lastly, the diversity of the cellular and extracellular matrix, with their viscoelastic properties, is essential to understanding the FPBs' mechanism of action.

Summary: Physicians must be aware of the role of fascial microscopic anatomy and better understand their properties to perform FPBs in a conscious manner and enhance pain management.

回顾的目的:在过去的 20 年中,人们对筋膜的认识有了很大的进步,麻醉和外科手术也发生了很大的变化。筋膜平面阻滞(FPB)因其经证实的安全性和相对简便性而广受欢迎。在各种临床环境中,它们被用于手术和非手术适应症。越来越多的证据表明,筋膜的微观解剖与其作用机制之间存在联系。因此,迫切需要了解这些方面的知识,以便更好地优化疼痛治疗。本综述旨在总结深层/肌肉筋膜的不同微观方面,以拓展我们对 FPB 性能的理解:有大量证据支持 FPB 在疼痛治疗中的作用。然而,确切的作用机制仍不清楚。筋膜由各种结构元素组成,在显微镜下显示出复杂的解剖特征。它们包括嵌入细胞外基质(富含胶原蛋白和透明质酸)中的各种细胞类型。越来越多的研究表明,它们的神经支配有助于其感觉功能以及在本体感觉、运动协调和痛觉中的作用。最后,细胞和细胞外基质的多样性及其粘弹性对了解 FPB 的作用机制至关重要。小结:医生必须意识到筋膜微观解剖的作用,并更好地了解其特性,以便有意识地进行 FPB 并加强疼痛治疗。
{"title":"Fascial plane blocks: from microanatomy to clinical applications.","authors":"Carmelo Pirri, Debora Emanuela Torre, Carla Stecco","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001416","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001416","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>In the last 20 years, advancements in the understanding of fasciae have significantly transformed anaesthesia and surgery. Fascial plane blocks (FPBs) have gained popularity due to their validated safety profile and relative ease. They are used in various clinical settings for surgical and nonsurgical indications. Growing evidence suggests a link between the microscopic anatomy of fasciae and their mechanism of action. As a result, knowledge of these aspects is urgently needed to better optimise pain management. The purpose of this review is to summarise the different microscopic aspects of deep/muscular fascia to expand our understanding in the performance of FPBs.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>There is ample evidence to support the role of FPBs in pain management. However, the exact mechanism of action remains unclear. Fasciae are composed of various structural elements and display complex anatomical characteristics at the microscopic level. They include various cell types embedded within an extracellular matrix abundant in collagens and hyaluronan. Increasingly, numerous studies demonstrated their innervation that contributes to their sensory functions and their role in proprioception, motor coordination and pain perception. Lastly, the diversity of the cellular and extracellular matrix, with their viscoelastic properties, is essential to understanding the FPBs' mechanism of action.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Physicians must be aware of the role of fascial microscopic anatomy and better understand their properties to perform FPBs in a conscious manner and enhance pain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":50609,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11356744/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141898826","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Current Opinion in Anesthesiology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1