首页 > 最新文献

Current Opinion in Anesthesiology最新文献

英文 中文
Harnessing artificial intelligence for predicting and managing postoperative pain: a narrative literature review. 利用人工智能预测和管理术后疼痛:文献综述。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-25 DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001408
Ruba Sajdeya, Samer Narouze

Purpose of review: This review examines recent research on artificial intelligence focusing on machine learning (ML) models for predicting postoperative pain outcomes. We also identify technical, ethical, and practical hurdles that demand continued investigation and research.

Recent findings: Current ML models leverage diverse datasets, algorithmic techniques, and validation methods to identify predictive biomarkers, risk factors, and phenotypic signatures associated with increased acute and chronic postoperative pain and persistent opioid use. ML models demonstrate satisfactory performance to predict pain outcomes and their prognostic trajectories, identify modifiable risk factors and at-risk patients who benefit from targeted pain management strategies, and show promise in pain prevention applications. However, further evidence is needed to evaluate the reliability, generalizability, effectiveness, and safety of ML-driven approaches before their integration into perioperative pain management practices.

Summary: Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to enhance perioperative pain management by providing more accurate predictive models and personalized interventions. By leveraging ML algorithms, clinicians can better identify at-risk patients and tailor treatment strategies accordingly. However, successful implementation needs to address challenges in data quality, algorithmic complexity, and ethical and practical considerations. Future research should focus on validating AI-driven interventions in clinical practice and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration to advance perioperative care.

综述的目的:本综述探讨了人工智能方面的最新研究,重点是预测术后疼痛结果的机器学习(ML)模型。我们还指出了需要继续调查和研究的技术、伦理和实际障碍:目前的 ML 模型利用不同的数据集、算法技术和验证方法来识别与急性和慢性术后疼痛加剧及阿片类药物持续使用相关的预测性生物标志物、风险因素和表型特征。ML 模型在预测疼痛结果及其预后轨迹、识别可改变的风险因素和从有针对性的疼痛管理策略中获益的高危患者方面表现出令人满意的性能,并显示出在疼痛预防应用中的前景。然而,在将人工智能驱动的方法纳入围手术期疼痛管理实践之前,还需要进一步的证据来评估其可靠性、可推广性、有效性和安全性。摘要:人工智能(AI)通过提供更准确的预测模型和个性化干预措施,有可能加强围手术期疼痛管理。通过利用人工智能算法,临床医生可以更好地识别高危患者并相应地调整治疗策略。然而,成功的实施需要解决数据质量、算法复杂性以及伦理和实际考虑等方面的挑战。未来的研究应侧重于在临床实践中验证人工智能驱动的干预措施,并促进跨学科合作,以推进围手术期护理。
{"title":"Harnessing artificial intelligence for predicting and managing postoperative pain: a narrative literature review.","authors":"Ruba Sajdeya, Samer Narouze","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001408","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001408","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review examines recent research on artificial intelligence focusing on machine learning (ML) models for predicting postoperative pain outcomes. We also identify technical, ethical, and practical hurdles that demand continued investigation and research.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Current ML models leverage diverse datasets, algorithmic techniques, and validation methods to identify predictive biomarkers, risk factors, and phenotypic signatures associated with increased acute and chronic postoperative pain and persistent opioid use. ML models demonstrate satisfactory performance to predict pain outcomes and their prognostic trajectories, identify modifiable risk factors and at-risk patients who benefit from targeted pain management strategies, and show promise in pain prevention applications. However, further evidence is needed to evaluate the reliability, generalizability, effectiveness, and safety of ML-driven approaches before their integration into perioperative pain management practices.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to enhance perioperative pain management by providing more accurate predictive models and personalized interventions. By leveraging ML algorithms, clinicians can better identify at-risk patients and tailor treatment strategies accordingly. However, successful implementation needs to address challenges in data quality, algorithmic complexity, and ethical and practical considerations. Future research should focus on validating AI-driven interventions in clinical practice and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration to advance perioperative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50609,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"604-615"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141621661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections with particulate vs. nonparticulate steroid: an evidence-informed review on shifting gear to a personalized medicine paradigm. 腰椎经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射与微粒类固醇注射:转向个性化医疗模式的循证综述。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-11 DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001402
Steven P Cohen, Jason D Ross

Purpose of review: To provide an evidence-informed review weighing the pros and cons of particulate vs. nonparticulate steroids for lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESI).

Recent findings: The relative use of nonparticulate vs. particulate steroids for lumbar TFESI has risen recently in light of catastrophic consequences reported for the latter during cervical TFESI. Among various causes of spinal cord infarct, an exceedingly rare event in the lower lumbar spine, embolization of particulate steroid is among the least likely. Case reports have documented cases of spinal cord infarct during lower lumbar TFESI with both particulate and nonparticulate steroids, with database reviews finding no difference in complication rates. There is some evidence for superiority of particulate over nonparticulate steroids in well-designed studies, which could lead to increase steroid exposure (i.e. more injections) and treatment failure resulting in surgical and/or opioid management when nonparticulate steroids are utilized.

Summary: Similar to a paradigm shift in medicine, a personalized approach based on a shared decision model and the consequences of treatment failure, should be utilized in deciding which steroid to utilize. Alternatives to ESI include high-volume injections with nonsteroid solutions, and the use of hypertonic saline, which possesses anti-inflammatory properties and has been shown to be superior to isotonic saline in preliminary clinical studies.

综述目的:权衡腰椎经椎间硬膜外类固醇注射(TFESI)中微粒类固醇与非微粒类固醇的利弊:最近的研究结果:鉴于颈椎经硬膜外类固醇注射(TFESI)时非颗粒类固醇与颗粒类固醇的灾难性后果报道,腰椎经硬膜外类固醇注射(TFESI)时非颗粒类固醇与颗粒类固醇的相对使用率有所上升。脊髓梗塞在下腰椎中极为罕见,在导致脊髓梗塞的各种原因中,微粒类固醇栓塞的可能性最小。病例报告记录了在使用微粒类固醇和非微粒类固醇进行下腰椎 TFESI 期间发生脊髓梗塞的病例,数据库回顾发现并发症发生率并无差异。总结:与医学模式的转变类似,在决定使用哪种类固醇时,应采用基于共同决策模式和治疗失败后果的个性化方法。ESI的替代方案包括使用非类固醇溶液进行大容量注射,以及使用高渗盐水,后者具有抗炎特性,在初步临床研究中已被证明优于等渗盐水。
{"title":"Lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections with particulate vs. nonparticulate steroid: an evidence-informed review on shifting gear to a personalized medicine paradigm.","authors":"Steven P Cohen, Jason D Ross","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001402","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001402","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To provide an evidence-informed review weighing the pros and cons of particulate vs. nonparticulate steroids for lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESI).</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The relative use of nonparticulate vs. particulate steroids for lumbar TFESI has risen recently in light of catastrophic consequences reported for the latter during cervical TFESI. Among various causes of spinal cord infarct, an exceedingly rare event in the lower lumbar spine, embolization of particulate steroid is among the least likely. Case reports have documented cases of spinal cord infarct during lower lumbar TFESI with both particulate and nonparticulate steroids, with database reviews finding no difference in complication rates. There is some evidence for superiority of particulate over nonparticulate steroids in well-designed studies, which could lead to increase steroid exposure (i.e. more injections) and treatment failure resulting in surgical and/or opioid management when nonparticulate steroids are utilized.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Similar to a paradigm shift in medicine, a personalized approach based on a shared decision model and the consequences of treatment failure, should be utilized in deciding which steroid to utilize. Alternatives to ESI include high-volume injections with nonsteroid solutions, and the use of hypertonic saline, which possesses anti-inflammatory properties and has been shown to be superior to isotonic saline in preliminary clinical studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50609,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"565-574"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141621664","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Postoperative pain management after thoracic transplantations. 胸腔移植术后疼痛管理。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-31 DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001418
Clara Lobo, Boris Tufegdzic

Purpose of review: Heart and lung transplantation evolution marked significant milestones. Pioneering efforts of Dr Christiaan Barnard with the first successful heart transplant in 1967, followed by advancements in heart-lung and single-lung transplants by Drs Bruce Reitz, Norman Shumway, and Joel Cooper laid the groundwork for contemporary organ transplantation, offering hope for patients with end-stage heart and pulmonary diseases.

Recent findings: Pretransplant opioid use in heart transplant recipients is linked to higher mortality and opioid dependence posttransplant. Effective pain control is crucial to reduce opioid-related adverse effects and enhance recovery. However, research on specific pain management protocols for heart transplant recipients is limited. In lung transplantation effective pain management is crucial. Studies emphasize the benefits of multimodal strategies, including thoracic epidural analgesia and thoracic paravertebral blocks, to enhance recovery and reduce opioid use. Perioperative pain control challenges in lung transplantation are unique and necessitate careful consideration to prevent complications and improve outcomes.

Summary: This review emphasizes the importance of tailored pain management in heart and lung transplant recipients. It advocates for extended follow-up and alternative analgesics to minimize opioid dependency and enhance quality of life. Further high-quality research is needed to optimize postoperative analgesia and improve patient outcomes.

回顾的目的:心肺移植的发展具有重要的里程碑意义。克里斯蒂安-巴纳德(Christiaan Barnard)博士于 1967 年成功进行了首次心脏移植,随后布鲁斯-雷茨(Bruce Reitz)、诺曼-沙姆韦(Norman Shumway)和乔尔-库珀(Joel Cooper)博士在心肺和单肺移植方面取得了进展,为当代器官移植奠定了基础,为终末期心肺疾病患者带来了希望:最近的研究结果:心脏移植受者在移植前使用阿片类药物与较高的死亡率和移植后对阿片类药物的依赖有关。有效的疼痛控制对于减少阿片类药物相关不良反应和促进康复至关重要。然而,针对心脏移植受者的特定疼痛管理方案的研究却很有限。在肺移植中,有效的疼痛控制至关重要。研究强调了多模式策略(包括胸硬膜外镇痛和胸椎旁阻滞)对促进康复和减少阿片类药物使用的益处。肺移植围手术期疼痛控制的挑战是独特的,需要仔细考虑以预防并发症和改善预后。摘要:本综述强调了对心脏和肺移植受者进行量身定制的疼痛管理的重要性。它提倡延长随访时间和使用替代镇痛药,以尽量减少阿片类药物依赖性并提高生活质量。需要进一步开展高质量的研究,以优化术后镇痛并改善患者预后。
{"title":"Postoperative pain management after thoracic transplantations.","authors":"Clara Lobo, Boris Tufegdzic","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001418","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001418","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Heart and lung transplantation evolution marked significant milestones. Pioneering efforts of Dr Christiaan Barnard with the first successful heart transplant in 1967, followed by advancements in heart-lung and single-lung transplants by Drs Bruce Reitz, Norman Shumway, and Joel Cooper laid the groundwork for contemporary organ transplantation, offering hope for patients with end-stage heart and pulmonary diseases.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Pretransplant opioid use in heart transplant recipients is linked to higher mortality and opioid dependence posttransplant. Effective pain control is crucial to reduce opioid-related adverse effects and enhance recovery. However, research on specific pain management protocols for heart transplant recipients is limited. In lung transplantation effective pain management is crucial. Studies emphasize the benefits of multimodal strategies, including thoracic epidural analgesia and thoracic paravertebral blocks, to enhance recovery and reduce opioid use. Perioperative pain control challenges in lung transplantation are unique and necessitate careful consideration to prevent complications and improve outcomes.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This review emphasizes the importance of tailored pain management in heart and lung transplant recipients. It advocates for extended follow-up and alternative analgesics to minimize opioid dependency and enhance quality of life. Further high-quality research is needed to optimize postoperative analgesia and improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50609,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"493-503"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141861452","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Current opinion: optimize radiofrequency ablation through electrophysiological principles, modeling, and clinical recommendations. 当前观点:通过电生理学原理、建模和临床建议优化射频消融。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-12 DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001419
David A Provenzano, Jared A Heller

Purpose of review: This article aims to empower the interventional pain physician to utilize RFA effectively by explaining the technical and electrophysiological features of monopolar, bipolar, and internally cooled RFA. Scientific data are used to provide advice on the effective, well tolerated, and rational application of these techniques. Moreover, physicians need to know how to analyze and generalize ex-vivo and in-vivo models to the clinical setting to optimize clinical outcomes.

Recent findings: Recent studies suggest that there are many ways to enhance the technical effectiveness of interventional pain medicine RFA through adjustments in the equipment selection and settings and the local tissue conditions specific to the targeted anatomical area. These modifications could assist in improving clinical and safety outcomes.

Summary: To optimize both the efficacy and safety of RFA, physicians must understand, conceptualize, interpret, and clinically translate the basic science of RFA. This knowledge is crucial for optimizing equipment selection and settings based on target location to enhance clinical outcomes and limit technical failures.

综述目的:本文旨在通过解释单极、双极和内部冷却 RFA 的技术和电生理特点,使介入疼痛科医生能够有效地使用 RFA。科学数据为有效、良好耐受和合理应用这些技术提供了建议。此外,医生需要知道如何分析体内外模型并将其推广到临床环境中,以优化临床结果:最近的研究表明,有许多方法可以通过调整设备的选择和设置以及目标解剖区域特定的局部组织条件来提高介入疼痛医学射频消融的技术效果。总结:为了优化射频消融术的疗效和安全性,医生必须了解、概念化、解释并在临床上转化射频消融术的基础科学。这些知识对于根据靶点位置优化设备选择和设置以提高临床疗效并限制技术故障至关重要。
{"title":"Current opinion: optimize radiofrequency ablation through electrophysiological principles, modeling, and clinical recommendations.","authors":"David A Provenzano, Jared A Heller","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001419","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001419","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This article aims to empower the interventional pain physician to utilize RFA effectively by explaining the technical and electrophysiological features of monopolar, bipolar, and internally cooled RFA. Scientific data are used to provide advice on the effective, well tolerated, and rational application of these techniques. Moreover, physicians need to know how to analyze and generalize ex-vivo and in-vivo models to the clinical setting to optimize clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent studies suggest that there are many ways to enhance the technical effectiveness of interventional pain medicine RFA through adjustments in the equipment selection and settings and the local tissue conditions specific to the targeted anatomical area. These modifications could assist in improving clinical and safety outcomes.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>To optimize both the efficacy and safety of RFA, physicians must understand, conceptualize, interpret, and clinically translate the basic science of RFA. This knowledge is crucial for optimizing equipment selection and settings based on target location to enhance clinical outcomes and limit technical failures.</p>","PeriodicalId":50609,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"553-564"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141983808","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perioperative care of patients with recent stroke undergoing nonemergent, nonneurological, noncardiac, nonvascular surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 对近期接受非急诊、非神经、非心脏、非血管手术的中风患者的围手术期护理:系统综述和荟萃分析。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-10 DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001403
Abhijit V Lele, Elizabeth Olive Moreton, Jayashree Sundararajan, Samuel Neal Blacker

Purpose of review: To systematically review and perform a meta-analysis of published literature regarding postoperative stroke and mortality in patients with a history of stroke and to provide a framework for preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative care in an elective setting.

Recent findings: Patients with nonneurological, noncardiac, and nonvascular surgery within three months after stroke have a 153-fold risk, those within 6 months have a 50-fold risk, and those within 12 months have a 20-fold risk of postoperative stroke. There is a 12-fold risk of in-hospital mortality within three months and a three-to-four-fold risk of mortality for more than 12 months after stroke. The risk of stroke and mortality continues to persist years after stroke. Recurrent stroke is common in patients in whom anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy is discontinued. Stroke and time elapsed after stroke should be included in the preoperative assessment questionnaire, and a stroke-specific risk assessment should be performed before surgical planning is pursued.

Summary: In patients with a history of a recent stroke, anesthesiology, surgery, and neurology experts should create a shared mental model in which the patient/surrogate decision-maker is informed about the risks and benefits of the proposed surgical procedure; secondary-stroke-prevention medications are reviewed; plans are made for interruptions and resumption; and intraoperative care is individualized to reduce the likelihood of postoperative stroke or death.

综述目的:系统回顾和荟萃分析已发表的有关卒中病史患者术后卒中和死亡率的文献,为择期手术的术前、术中和术后护理提供框架:最近的研究结果:中风后 3 个月内接受非神经、非心脏和非血管手术的患者术后中风的风险为 153 倍,6 个月内的患者术后中风的风险为 50 倍,12 个月内的患者术后中风的风险为 20 倍。中风后三个月内的院内死亡风险为 12 倍,中风后 12 个月以上的死亡风险为 3-4 倍。中风和死亡风险在中风后数年仍持续存在。停用抗凝/抗血小板治疗的患者常见中风复发。术前评估问卷中应包括卒中和卒中后的时间,在制定手术计划前应进行卒中特异性风险评估。小结:对于近期有卒中病史的患者,麻醉科、外科和神经内科专家应建立一个共享的心理模型,让患者/代理决策者了解拟议手术的风险和益处;审查二级卒中预防药物;制定中断和恢复计划;术中护理个体化,以降低术后卒中或死亡的可能性。
{"title":"Perioperative care of patients with recent stroke undergoing nonemergent, nonneurological, noncardiac, nonvascular surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Abhijit V Lele, Elizabeth Olive Moreton, Jayashree Sundararajan, Samuel Neal Blacker","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001403","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001403","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To systematically review and perform a meta-analysis of published literature regarding postoperative stroke and mortality in patients with a history of stroke and to provide a framework for preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative care in an elective setting.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Patients with nonneurological, noncardiac, and nonvascular surgery within three months after stroke have a 153-fold risk, those within 6 months have a 50-fold risk, and those within 12 months have a 20-fold risk of postoperative stroke. There is a 12-fold risk of in-hospital mortality within three months and a three-to-four-fold risk of mortality for more than 12 months after stroke. The risk of stroke and mortality continues to persist years after stroke. Recurrent stroke is common in patients in whom anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy is discontinued. Stroke and time elapsed after stroke should be included in the preoperative assessment questionnaire, and a stroke-specific risk assessment should be performed before surgical planning is pursued.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>In patients with a history of a recent stroke, anesthesiology, surgery, and neurology experts should create a shared mental model in which the patient/surrogate decision-maker is informed about the risks and benefits of the proposed surgical procedure; secondary-stroke-prevention medications are reviewed; plans are made for interruptions and resumption; and intraoperative care is individualized to reduce the likelihood of postoperative stroke or death.</p>","PeriodicalId":50609,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"460-469"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141621668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pharmacokinetics in regional anesthesia. 区域麻醉的药代动力学。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-12 DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001398
André M Leite-Moreira, André Correia, Nuno Vale, Joana B Mourão

Purpose of review: Pharmacokinetics of local anesthetics are one of the main determinants of success and safety of regional anesthesia and comprise local and systemic distribution phases. This review aims to summarize the latest research findings on this topic in the context of various regional blocks performed for different surgeries and patient populations.

Recent findings: Research into local kinetics and systemic absorption of local anesthetics has chiefly been focused on novel fascial plane blocks, especially the erector spinae plane block, as these are increasingly adopted for regional anesthesia and pain management. As their clinical efficacy is very dependent on injection of large volumes of local anesthetic, doses over typically recommended limits are often administered.

Summary: Fascial plane blocks are the regional anesthesia techniques in need of the most pharmacokinetic characterization, not only to better understand their complex mechanisms of action but also to avoid harm from excessive doses of local anesthetics. Further mapping of risk factors for systemic toxicity from administration in different block sites is crucial. Extremes of age and pregnancy are vulnerable patient populations but in whom regional anesthesia, including novel techniques, has been performed with few complications.

综述的目的:局麻药的药代动力学是区域麻醉成功和安全的主要决定因素之一,包括局部和全身分布阶段。本综述旨在总结针对不同手术和患者群体实施的各种区域阻滞在这方面的最新研究成果:对局麻药的局部动力学和全身吸收的研究主要集中在新型筋膜平面阻滞,尤其是竖脊平面阻滞,因为这些阻滞越来越多地被用于区域麻醉和疼痛治疗。由于其临床疗效在很大程度上取决于大量局麻药的注射,因此注射剂量往往超过通常建议的限度:筋膜平面阻滞是最需要进行药代动力学特征描述的区域麻醉技术,这不仅是为了更好地了解其复杂的作用机制,也是为了避免过量使用局麻药造成伤害。进一步摸清在不同阻滞部位用药导致全身中毒的风险因素至关重要。极端年龄段和妊娠期的患者是易感人群,但在对他们进行区域麻醉(包括新型技术)时,并发症很少。
{"title":"Pharmacokinetics in regional anesthesia.","authors":"André M Leite-Moreira, André Correia, Nuno Vale, Joana B Mourão","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001398","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001398","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Pharmacokinetics of local anesthetics are one of the main determinants of success and safety of regional anesthesia and comprise local and systemic distribution phases. This review aims to summarize the latest research findings on this topic in the context of various regional blocks performed for different surgeries and patient populations.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Research into local kinetics and systemic absorption of local anesthetics has chiefly been focused on novel fascial plane blocks, especially the erector spinae plane block, as these are increasingly adopted for regional anesthesia and pain management. As their clinical efficacy is very dependent on injection of large volumes of local anesthetic, doses over typically recommended limits are often administered.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Fascial plane blocks are the regional anesthesia techniques in need of the most pharmacokinetic characterization, not only to better understand their complex mechanisms of action but also to avoid harm from excessive doses of local anesthetics. Further mapping of risk factors for systemic toxicity from administration in different block sites is crucial. Extremes of age and pregnancy are vulnerable patient populations but in whom regional anesthesia, including novel techniques, has been performed with few complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":50609,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"520-525"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141621669","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Current concepts and targets for preventing the transition of acute to chronic postsurgical pain. 预防手术后急性疼痛向慢性疼痛转变的当前概念和目标。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-31 DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001424
Adeeb Oweidat, Hari Kalagara, Rakesh V Sondekoppam

Purpose of review: It is estimated that approximately a third of patients undergoing certain surgeries may report some degree of persistent pain postoperatively. Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) reduces quality of life, is challenging to treat, and has significant socio-economic impact.

Recent findings: From an epidemiological perspective, factors that predispose patients to the development of CPSP may be considered in relation to the patient, the procedure or, the care environment. Prevention or management of transition from acute to chronic pain often need a multidisciplinary approach beginning early in the preoperative period and continuing beyond surgical admission. The current concepts regarding the role of central and peripheral nervous systems in chronification of pain may provide targets for future therapies but, the current evidence seems to suggest that a multimodal analgesic approach of preventive analgesia along with a continued follow-up and treatment after hospital discharge may hold the key to identify and manage the transitioning of acute to chronic pain.

Summary: A comprehensive multidisciplinary approach with prior identification of risk factors, minimizing the surgical insult and a culture of utilizing multimodal analgesia and continued surveillance beyond the period of hospitalization is an important step towards reducing the development of chronic pain. A transitional pain service model may accomplish many of these goals.

审查目的:据估计,在接受某些手术的患者中,约有三分之一的人在术后会出现某种程度的持续疼痛。慢性术后疼痛(CPSP)会降低患者的生活质量,治疗难度大,并对社会经济产生重大影响:从流行病学的角度来看,导致患者发生 CPSP 的因素可能与患者、手术或护理环境有关。预防或处理从急性疼痛到慢性疼痛的转变通常需要多学科方法,从术前早期开始,一直持续到手术入院之后。目前关于中枢和外周神经系统在疼痛慢性化中的作用的概念可能为未来的治疗提供了目标,但目前的证据似乎表明,预防性镇痛的多模式镇痛方法以及出院后的持续跟踪和治疗可能是识别和管理急性疼痛向慢性疼痛过渡的关键。小结:采用多学科综合方法,事先识别风险因素,尽量减少手术损伤,培养使用多模式镇痛和住院后持续监测的文化,是减少慢性疼痛发展的重要一步。过渡性疼痛服务模式可以实现上述许多目标。
{"title":"Current concepts and targets for preventing the transition of acute to chronic postsurgical pain.","authors":"Adeeb Oweidat, Hari Kalagara, Rakesh V Sondekoppam","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001424","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001424","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>It is estimated that approximately a third of patients undergoing certain surgeries may report some degree of persistent pain postoperatively. Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) reduces quality of life, is challenging to treat, and has significant socio-economic impact.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>From an epidemiological perspective, factors that predispose patients to the development of CPSP may be considered in relation to the patient, the procedure or, the care environment. Prevention or management of transition from acute to chronic pain often need a multidisciplinary approach beginning early in the preoperative period and continuing beyond surgical admission. The current concepts regarding the role of central and peripheral nervous systems in chronification of pain may provide targets for future therapies but, the current evidence seems to suggest that a multimodal analgesic approach of preventive analgesia along with a continued follow-up and treatment after hospital discharge may hold the key to identify and manage the transitioning of acute to chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>A comprehensive multidisciplinary approach with prior identification of risk factors, minimizing the surgical insult and a culture of utilizing multimodal analgesia and continued surveillance beyond the period of hospitalization is an important step towards reducing the development of chronic pain. A transitional pain service model may accomplish many of these goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":50609,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"588-596"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141861451","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Opioid alternatives in spine surgeries. 脊柱手术中的阿片类药物替代品。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-06 DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001423
Shobana Rajan, Gaiha Rishi, Marco Ibrahim

Purpose of review: The escalating opioid crisis has intensified the need to explore alternative pain management strategies for patients undergoing spine surgery. This review is timely and relevant as it synthesizes recent research on opioid alternatives for perioperative management, assessing their efficacy, side effects, and postoperative outcomes.

Recent findings: A systematic search was conducted to capture articles from the past 18 months that examined opioid-sparing strategies. Findings indicate that multimodal analgesia, incorporating nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, lidocaine, gabapentinoids, N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists, dexmedetomidine, and emerging regional block techniques like the erector spinae block and TLIF (thoraco lumbar interfascial block), can significantly reduce opioid consumption without compromising pain relief. Additionally, these approaches reduce opioid-related side effects such as postoperative nausea, vomiting, and prolonged hospital stays.

Summary: The use of multimodal analgesia aligns with current pain management guidelines and addresses public health concerns related to opioid misuse. While effective, these alternatives are not without side effects, and the ultimate outcome depends on balancing benefits and risks. Future research should focus on the long-term outcomes of opioid alternatives, their effectiveness across diverse populations, and further validation and optimization of these strategies.

审查目的:不断升级的阿片类药物危机加剧了为脊柱手术患者探索其他疼痛治疗策略的必要性。这篇综述综述了围手术期阿片类药物替代治疗的最新研究,评估了其疗效、副作用和术后效果,因此非常及时且具有现实意义:最近的研究结果:我们进行了一次系统性检索,以获取过去 18 个月内研究阿片类药物替代策略的文章。研究结果表明,结合非甾体类抗炎药(NSAIDs)、对乙酰氨基酚、利多卡因、加巴喷丁类、N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)拮抗剂、右美托咪定以及新出现的区域阻滞技术(如竖脊肌阻滞和TLIF(胸腰椎筋膜间阻滞))的多模式镇痛可以在不影响疼痛缓解的情况下显著减少阿片类药物的用量。此外,这些方法还能减少与阿片类药物相关的副作用,如术后恶心、呕吐和住院时间延长等。摘要:多模式镇痛的使用符合当前的疼痛管理指南,并能解决与阿片类药物滥用相关的公共卫生问题。这些替代方法虽然有效,但并非没有副作用,最终结果取决于效益与风险之间的平衡。未来的研究应重点关注阿片类药物替代品的长期疗效、在不同人群中的有效性,以及这些策略的进一步验证和优化。
{"title":"Opioid alternatives in spine surgeries.","authors":"Shobana Rajan, Gaiha Rishi, Marco Ibrahim","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001423","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001423","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The escalating opioid crisis has intensified the need to explore alternative pain management strategies for patients undergoing spine surgery. This review is timely and relevant as it synthesizes recent research on opioid alternatives for perioperative management, assessing their efficacy, side effects, and postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>A systematic search was conducted to capture articles from the past 18 months that examined opioid-sparing strategies. Findings indicate that multimodal analgesia, incorporating nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, lidocaine, gabapentinoids, N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists, dexmedetomidine, and emerging regional block techniques like the erector spinae block and TLIF (thoraco lumbar interfascial block), can significantly reduce opioid consumption without compromising pain relief. Additionally, these approaches reduce opioid-related side effects such as postoperative nausea, vomiting, and prolonged hospital stays.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The use of multimodal analgesia aligns with current pain management guidelines and addresses public health concerns related to opioid misuse. While effective, these alternatives are not without side effects, and the ultimate outcome depends on balancing benefits and risks. Future research should focus on the long-term outcomes of opioid alternatives, their effectiveness across diverse populations, and further validation and optimization of these strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50609,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"470-477"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141983809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Anesthesia for traumatic brain injury. 脑外伤麻醉。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-04 DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001404
Nys Willem Siebers, Luzius A Steiner

Purpose of review: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) presents complex clinical challenges, requiring a nuanced understanding of its pathophysiology and current management principles to improve patient outcomes. Anesthetists play a critical role in care and need to stay updated with recent evidence and trends to ensure high-quality treatment. The Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines, last updated in 2016, have shown moderate adherence, and much of the current management relies on expert opinions. This literature review synthesizes the current evidence and provides insights into the role of anesthetists in TBI management.

Recent findings: Recent literature has emphasized the importance of tailored anesthetic management principles in treating TBI, focusing on minimizing secondary brain injury during neurosurgical interventions or extracranial surgery. Emerging trends include individualized intracranial pressure approaches and multimodal neuromonitoring for comprehensive assessment of cerebral physiology.

Summary: Anesthesia for TBI patients requires a comprehensive approach that balances anesthetic goals with the unique pathophysiological factors of brain injury. Despite recent research expanding our understanding, challenges remain in standardizing protocols and addressing individual patient response variability. Adherence to established management principles, personalized approaches, and ongoing research is crucial for improving the outcomes.

审查目的:创伤性脑损伤 (TBI) 带来了复杂的临床挑战,需要对其病理生理学和当前的管理原则有细致入微的了解,以改善患者的预后。麻醉师在护理中发挥着关键作用,需要随时了解最新证据和趋势,以确保高质量的治疗。脑外伤基金会指南》最近一次更新是在 2016 年,其遵守情况一般,目前的管理大多依赖于专家意见。本文献综述综合了当前的证据,并对麻醉师在 TBI 管理中的作用提出了见解:最近的文献强调了量身定制的麻醉管理原则在治疗创伤性脑损伤中的重要性,重点是在神经外科干预或颅外手术中尽量减少继发性脑损伤。新趋势包括个体化颅内压方法和多模态神经监测,以全面评估脑生理学。摘要:TBI 患者的麻醉需要一种综合方法,以平衡麻醉目标和脑损伤的独特病理生理因素。尽管最近的研究拓展了我们的认识,但在标准化方案和解决患者个体反应差异方面仍存在挑战。坚持既定的管理原则、个性化的方法和持续的研究对改善结果至关重要。
{"title":"Anesthesia for traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Nys Willem Siebers, Luzius A Steiner","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001404","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001404","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) presents complex clinical challenges, requiring a nuanced understanding of its pathophysiology and current management principles to improve patient outcomes. Anesthetists play a critical role in care and need to stay updated with recent evidence and trends to ensure high-quality treatment. The Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines, last updated in 2016, have shown moderate adherence, and much of the current management relies on expert opinions. This literature review synthesizes the current evidence and provides insights into the role of anesthetists in TBI management.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent literature has emphasized the importance of tailored anesthetic management principles in treating TBI, focusing on minimizing secondary brain injury during neurosurgical interventions or extracranial surgery. Emerging trends include individualized intracranial pressure approaches and multimodal neuromonitoring for comprehensive assessment of cerebral physiology.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Anesthesia for TBI patients requires a comprehensive approach that balances anesthetic goals with the unique pathophysiological factors of brain injury. Despite recent research expanding our understanding, challenges remain in standardizing protocols and addressing individual patient response variability. Adherence to established management principles, personalized approaches, and ongoing research is crucial for improving the outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50609,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"486-492"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141621660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Keeping patients in the dark: perioperative anesthetic considerations for patients receiving 5-aminolevulinic acid for glioma resection. 让患者蒙在鼓里:接受 5-氨基乙酰丙酸治疗胶质瘤切除术的患者围手术期麻醉注意事项。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-12 DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001406
Benish Fatima, Lauren K Licatino, Arnoley S Abcejo

Purpose of review: 5-Aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride (5-ALA), available under the trade name Gleolan, is an orally administered fluorophore drug used to enhance visual differentiation of cancerous tissue from healthy tissue, primarily during surgical resection of high-grade gliomas. Although given preoperatively, 5-ALA has important implications for anesthetic care throughout the perioperative period. This article reviews pharmacology, safety concerns, and perioperative considerations for patients who receive oral 5-ALA.

Recent findings: Although approved for clinical use by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 2017, studies and case reports published since then have further delineated side effects of this medication and its mechanisms and pharmacokinetics.

Summary: Mitigating the possible side effects of 5-ALA requires an understanding of its basic mechanism as well as focused perioperative planning and communication. Administration of this medication may result in nausea, vomiting, photosensitivity, increase in serum concentration of liver enzymes, and hypotension. Patients who receive 5-ALA must be protected from prolonged light exposure during the first 48 h after consumption and administration of other photosensitizing agents should be avoided (Supplemental Video File/Video abstract).

审查目的:5-Aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride(5-ALA),商品名为 Gleolan,是一种口服荧光剂药物,主要用于在高级别胶质瘤手术切除过程中,增强癌组织与健康组织的视觉分辨能力。虽然 5-ALA 在术前给药,但它对整个围手术期的麻醉护理具有重要影响。本文回顾了接受口服 5-ALA 的患者的药理学、安全性问题和围术期注意事项:尽管美国食品和药物管理局于 2017 年批准该药物用于临床,但此后发表的研究和病例报告进一步阐明了该药物的副作用及其机制和药代动力学。摘要:减轻 5-ALA 可能产生的副作用需要了解其基本机制,并进行有针对性的围术期规划和沟通。使用这种药物可能会导致恶心和呕吐、光敏感性、肝酶血清浓度升高和低血压。接受 5-ALA 治疗的患者在用药后的 48 小时内必须避免长时间暴露在光线下,并应避免使用其他光敏性药物(补充视频文件/视频摘要)。
{"title":"Keeping patients in the dark: perioperative anesthetic considerations for patients receiving 5-aminolevulinic acid for glioma resection.","authors":"Benish Fatima, Lauren K Licatino, Arnoley S Abcejo","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001406","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001406","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>5-Aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride (5-ALA), available under the trade name Gleolan, is an orally administered fluorophore drug used to enhance visual differentiation of cancerous tissue from healthy tissue, primarily during surgical resection of high-grade gliomas. Although given preoperatively, 5-ALA has important implications for anesthetic care throughout the perioperative period. This article reviews pharmacology, safety concerns, and perioperative considerations for patients who receive oral 5-ALA.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Although approved for clinical use by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 2017, studies and case reports published since then have further delineated side effects of this medication and its mechanisms and pharmacokinetics.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Mitigating the possible side effects of 5-ALA requires an understanding of its basic mechanism as well as focused perioperative planning and communication. Administration of this medication may result in nausea, vomiting, photosensitivity, increase in serum concentration of liver enzymes, and hypotension. Patients who receive 5-ALA must be protected from prolonged light exposure during the first 48 h after consumption and administration of other photosensitizing agents should be avoided (Supplemental Video File/Video abstract).</p>","PeriodicalId":50609,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"446-452"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141621662","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Current Opinion in Anesthesiology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1