Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal最新文献

Introduction: The prevalence of uric acid stones increases regularly due to its high correlation with obesity, hypertension, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and aging. Uric acid stone formation is mainly due to an acidic urinary pH secondary to an impaired urinary ammonium availability responsible for uric acid rather than soluble urate excretion. Alkalization of urine is therefore advocated to prevent uric acid crystallization and considered effective therapy.

Methods: We report a large series of 120 patients with uric acid kidney stones who were successfully treated with potassium citrate (K-citrate) for stone dissolution without any urologic intervention to prevent stone recurrence, with a median 3.14 years followup. The K-citrate was diluted in 1.5 L of water, avoiding gastrointestinal disorders.

Results: Among 75 patients having stones in their kidney at initiation of therapy, a complete chemolysis was obtained in 88% of cases. Stone risk factors decreased under treatment, mainly due to increased diuresis, urinary pH, and citrate excretion. Treatment was stopped in only 2% of patients due to side effects, with no hyperkalemia onset despite a median urinary potassium increase of 44 mmol/day.

Conclusions: Contrary to other reports, our data show that medical treatment of uric acid kidney stones is well-tolerated and efficient if regular monitoring of urinary pH is performed.

Introduction: Prostatic carcinosarcoma comprises <1% of all prostate neoplasms. The literature on this disease is limited to a few case studies, primarily due to the rarity of this malignancy. We aimed to investigate the demographic, clinical, and histologic factors, prognosis, and survival of prostatic carcinosarcoma.

Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify patients with prostatic carcinosarcoma from 2000-2018. Demographic and clinical data, including age, race, sex, tumor grade, stage, tumor size, lymph node status, metastasis, and treatment modalities, were recorded.

Results: Prostatic carcinosarcoma had a median age of 72 years at diagnosis, with a majority of cases among White individuals (93%). When reported, the histologic grade comprised moderately differentiated (3.3%), poorly differentiated (56.7%), and undifferentiated/anaplastic (40%) subtypes. In patients with reported data, tumor size varied between 2-5 cm (15.8%) and >5 cm (84.2%). Distant metastasis most commonly occurred in the liver (12.5%) and lung (12.5%), followed by the bone (8.3%). The most common treatment performed was surgery with radiation (32.4%). The five-year overall survival was 11.9%.

Conclusions: Prostatic carcinosarcoma affects men in the seventh decade of life. Regional and distant tumor stage is considered an indicator of survival. Prostate carcinosarcoma is rare; due to its aggressive nature, a deeper understanding, and an improved personalized therapeutic approach are necessary for improving patient outcomes in this challenging arena of oncology.

Chatbots, or conversational robots, have become a strategy or support tool for urologic patient care, diagnostic communication, and treatment. With regard to patients, studies have shown that chatbots can answer medical questions with similar percentages of acceptability as urologists. In addition, they can contribute to patient education, allowing them to ask questions that do not arise during medical consultation. They have also proven to be good tools for health promotion and disease prevention. These benefits can also serve doctors, as robots can support medical consultation and the reading of medical records, making patient care more efficient; however, there are several limitations, including the accuracy of bot-generated answers and the acceptability that urologists give to this type of tool.

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to gather initial safety and efficacy data with the Optilume BPH Catheter System for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Methods: A total of 80 men with moderate-to-severe LUTS secondary to BPH were enrolled and treated with the Optilume BPH Catheter System. Symptoms were evaluated using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index (BPHII). Improvement in urinary flow and relief of obstruction was evaluated by way of peak urinary flow rate (Qmax) and postvoid residual urine volume (PVR). Subjects were prospectively queried for adverse events at each study visit, and relatedness to the study device were evaluated by the investigators, as well as centrally adjudicated by the study principal investigator.

Results: Previous reports of symptom improvement in this cohort were maintained through four-year followup, with a significant reduction in IPSS and IPSS quality of life maintained through four years (-12.1, -2.8, respectively). Clinically meaningful improvement in Qmax was maintained in the majority of subjects, with an average improvement from baseline of +5.6 mL/sec. No treatment-related adverse events were reported in the long-term followup period.

Conclusions: Long-term followup through four years for subjects treated with the Optilume BPH Catheter System indicates durable outcomes in symptom improvement and functional improvement in flow rate. These results indicate the unique mechanism of action for Optilume BPH successfully achieves an immediate mechanical effect that is maintained long-term through incorporation of paclitaxel to maintain patency.

Introduction: We aimed to evaluate the novel use of a 1.9 mm Trilogy lithotripter probe with varying locations and composition of renal stones.

Methods: We prospectively enrolled patients to undergo mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) procedures using the 1.9 mm (instead of the standard 1.5 mm) Trilogy probe from August 2021 to April 2022. Several adjunctive irrigation measures compensated for reduced flow with the larger probe. Primary outcome was treatment efficiency. Patient demographics, preoperative demographics, and comorbidities, as well as real-time surgical data were extracted. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis tests to compare stone type and location.

Results: A total of 110 patients were included in this study. The median total treatment time was 6.8 minutes, median lithotripsy time was 3.3 minutes, median stone treatment efficiency was 0.34 mm/min, and treatment efficacy was 50.4 (lithotripter time/treatment time). Overall median lithotripter efficiency was 104.6 mm³/min. Treatment efficiency was similar among stone composition (p=0.245) and location (p=0.263). Lithotripter 3D and 1D efficiency was also similar among stone composition (p=0.637 and p=0.766, respectively). Lithotripter 1D efficiency was nearly twice as fast in the lower pole compared to other stone locations (p=0.010). Overall broken probe rate for this procedure was 12%, mostly at the beginning, suggesting a learning curve. Five patients had minor complications, including one patient that required admission to the hospital for postoperative pain management.

Conclusions: The 1.9 mm Trilogy lithotripter can be effective in mPCNL procedures with the use of easily implementable adjunctive irrigation techniques, decreasing the gap between lithotripsy time and total treatment time.

Introduction: We aimed to compare the detection rate of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant (cs)PCa by magnetic resonance imaging-guided targeted biopsy (MTBx) alone and MTBx plus systematic biopsy (SBx) using an outpatient transperineal (TP) approach under local anesthesia.

Methods: A retrospective study of patients who underwent outpatient TP prostate biopsy under local anesthesia at our tertiary institution between 2019 and 2022 was performed. To compare the proportions of PCa and csPCa in both pathways, McNemar's tests were used. Multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to determine the predictors of csPCa.

Results: Of 255 men included, 177 (69%) underwent MTBx alone. MTBx had similar detection rate for PCa (56%) and csPCa (47%) compared to the combination of MTBx and SBx (PCa, 61%; csPCa, 49%; p=0.1 and p=0.3, respectively). MTBx had lower median number of biopsy cores compared to the combination of MTBx and SBx (6 vs. 11, p<0.001). At multivariable logistic regression analysis, age (odds ratio [OR] 1.08 [1.04-1.13], p<0.001), prior negative biopsy (OR 0.19 [0.09-0.44], p<0.001), prostate-specific antigen density cutoff ≥ 0.15 (OR 3.17 [1.67-6.01], p<0.001), and prostate imaging reporting and data system ≥4 (OR 12.2 [4.21-35.6], p<0.001) were independent predictors of csPCa.

Conclusions: MTBx showed similar diagnostic performance to the combination of MTBx and SBx in patients undergoing outpatient TP prostate biopsy. Future studies are needed to evaluate the role of MTBx in avoiding unnecessary biopsies.

Introduction: During vasectomy reversal (VR), accurate intraoperative microscopic assessment of the vasal fluid for sperm presence and quality is essential in determining the indication for a vasovasostomy (VV) or vasoepididymostomy (VE). The use of testosterone therapy (TT), known to supress spermatogenesis, can potentially interfere with this determination. This initiative evaluated the impact of TT on vasal and epididymal fluid sperm characteristics and intraoperative decision-making among men on TT at the time of VR.

Methods: Of 2622 consecutive VRs performed from 2007-2023, patients actively using TT at the time of VR were identified. Details as to the type, dose, and duration of TT were documented. All patients were counselled regarding the impact of TT on spermatogenesis and encouraged to discontinue TT if possible. During VR, vasal and epididymal fluid (as indicated) was sampled and each aspirate underwent microscopic evaluation for sperm presence and quality, and categorized as: motile sperm/intact-non-motile sperm/sperm parts/no sperm. Rates of sperm presence/absence in the vasal/epididymal fluid, frequency of VV/VE, postoperative patency (presence of motile sperm), and semen parameters were compared among patients on TT vs. clinically matched patients not using TT at the time of VR.

Results: Among the 2622 VRs reviewed, 54 men (2%) reported using TT at the time of their VR. Despite its impact on spermatogenesis, intraoperative microscopic analysis of the reproductive fluid (vasal or epididymal) identified the presence of sperm in 95% (51/54) of patients. Testis biopsy confirmed sperm production among three patients with absence of sperm within the vasal or epididymal fluid. Rates of VV or VE did not significantly differ among men using TT at the time of VR compared to nonusers. Postoperative patency rates (TT: 78 % vs. no TT: 93%) and mean total motile sperm counts (TMC) were lower among patients using TT at the time of VR (7.9 vs. 28.3, p=0.02).

Conclusions: Use of TT at the time of VR does not appear to impact rates of intraoperative microscopic identification of sperm within the reproductive fluid or the indication for VV/VE. Postoperative patency rates and total motile sperm counts may be lowered by use of TT. Moreover, the determination to the etiology azoospermia postoperatively (production vs. obstruction) may be clouded by the use of TT during VR.

Introduction: Frailty is a good predictor of adverse outcomes among older patients, especially those who have undergone surgery. The prevalence of frailty among kidney transplant candidates is higher than the general population. This study aimed to explore the predictive value of frailty on post-transplant adverse outcomes among kidney recipients.

Methods: A systematic review was performed for relevant studies until May 20, 2022, using four databases (Embase, Medline, Cochrane, and PsycINFO) for prospective design studies (PROSPERP: CRD42022331022). Random-effect meta-analysis modeling was undertaken in RevMan 5.3 to estimate the predicting value of frailty on adverse outcomes after kidney transplant.

Results: This systematic review included 14 studies, eight of which were suitable for meta-analysis. Frailty increased the risk of mortality (pooled hazard ratio [HR] 1.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48-2.64), surgical complications (risk ratio [RR] 2.14, 95% CI 1.01-4.54), death-censored graft failure (DCGF) (pooled HR 3.31, 95% CI 1.27-8.62), length of stay (LOS) (pooled RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.05-2.39), length of stay ≥2 weeks (pooled odds ratio [OR] 1.72, 95% CI 1.26-2.35). and other common adverse outcomes among kidney transplant recipients.

Conclusions: Frailty is associated with adverse outcomes after kidney transplant. This systematic review suggests the importance of assessing frailty among kidney transplant candidates prior to transplantation. Further research focusing on pretransplant assessment combined with frailty is warranted to improve kidney transplant management.