首页 > 最新文献

Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal最新文献

英文 中文
Micro-cost analysis of reusable compared to affordable single-use flexible ureteroscopes. 可重复使用输尿管镜与可负担的一次性输尿管镜的微观成本分析。
IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.9327
Othmane Zekraoui, Nick Lee, Jaehoon Kim, Sébastien Belliveau, Aamer Alghamlas, Malek Meskawi, Dean Elterman, Francois Bénard, Bilal Chughtai, Naeem Bhojani

Introduction: Flexible ureteroscopy is increasingly used for managing upper urinary tract pathologies, particularly kidney stones. With the emergence of affordable, single-use flexible ureteroscopes (fURS) as an alternative to reusable systems, the contemporary economic impact of each device is unclear. We performed a micro-cost evaluation comparing reusable fURS with two single-use models in a single-payer, Canadian healthcare system.

Methods: The costs of reusable fURS were divided into acquisition, repair, and reprocessing expenses. Per-procedure costs for reusable fURS were calculated by dividing the total annual costs by the average annual number of procedures, whereas single-use costs were based solely on device prices. The total number of repairs and specific reasons for repairs were also collected for the entire reusable fURS fleet from 2022-2024.

Results: At our center, an average of 418 procedures were performed annually using reusable fURS, with total annual costs of $102 420.60, equaling to $245.03 per procedure. Reusable fURS become more cost-effective at volumes exceeding 130 cases compared to EU-Scope™ US 31E-12 and 83 cases compared to the Standard LithoVue™. Additionally, 65 repair events were recorded from 2022-2024, mainly due to distal tip leakage (77%). One repair was required for roughly 20 procedures (20.22:1).

Conclusions: Our analysis indicates that reusable systems are more cost-efficient in high-volume settings, while single-use devices, especially the EU-Scope™, may be advantageous in lower-volume centers. In tertiary centers, the use of single-use fURS represents an excellent opportunity to preserve the durability of reusable fURS, particularly during complex procedures with a high risk of ureteroscope damage.

导读:软性输尿管镜越来越多地用于治疗上尿路病变,特别是肾结石。随着可负担得起的一次性柔性输尿管镜(fURS)的出现,作为可重复使用系统的替代品,每种设备的当代经济影响尚不清楚。我们对加拿大单一付款人医疗保健系统中可重复使用的fURS与两种一次性使用的模型进行了微观成本评估。方法:将可重复使用毛皮的成本分为购置费、修理费和再加工费。可重复使用fURS的每程序成本是通过将年总成本除以年平均程序数来计算的,而单次使用成本仅基于设备价格。还收集了2022-2024年整个可重复使用fURS船队的维修总数和维修的具体原因。结果:在我们中心,平均每年使用可重复使用的fURS进行418次手术,年总费用为102 420.60美元,相当于每次手术245.03美元。与EU-Scope™US 31E-12和Standard LithoVue™相比,可重复使用的fURS在超过130箱和83箱时更具成本效益。此外,从2022年到2024年,记录了65例修复事件,主要是由于远端尖端泄漏(77%)。一次修复大约需要20个程序(20.22:1)。结论:我们的分析表明,可重复使用的系统在大容量环境中更具成本效益,而一次性设备,特别是EU-Scope™,在小容量中心可能更具优势。在三级中心,使用一次性氟尿嘧啶是保持可重复使用氟尿嘧啶耐用性的绝佳机会,特别是在输尿管镜损伤风险高的复杂手术中。
{"title":"Micro-cost analysis of reusable compared to affordable single-use flexible ureteroscopes.","authors":"Othmane Zekraoui, Nick Lee, Jaehoon Kim, Sébastien Belliveau, Aamer Alghamlas, Malek Meskawi, Dean Elterman, Francois Bénard, Bilal Chughtai, Naeem Bhojani","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.9327","DOIUrl":"10.5489/cuaj.9327","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Flexible ureteroscopy is increasingly used for managing upper urinary tract pathologies, particularly kidney stones. With the emergence of affordable, single-use flexible ureteroscopes (fURS) as an alternative to reusable systems, the contemporary economic impact of each device is unclear. We performed a micro-cost evaluation comparing reusable fURS with two single-use models in a single-payer, Canadian healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The costs of reusable fURS were divided into acquisition, repair, and reprocessing expenses. Per-procedure costs for reusable fURS were calculated by dividing the total annual costs by the average annual number of procedures, whereas single-use costs were based solely on device prices. The total number of repairs and specific reasons for repairs were also collected for the entire reusable fURS fleet from 2022-2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At our center, an average of 418 procedures were performed annually using reusable fURS, with total annual costs of $102 420.60, equaling to $245.03 per procedure. Reusable fURS become more cost-effective at volumes exceeding 130 cases compared to EU-Scope™ US 31E-12 and 83 cases compared to the Standard LithoVue™. Additionally, 65 repair events were recorded from 2022-2024, mainly due to distal tip leakage (77%). One repair was required for roughly 20 procedures (20.22:1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our analysis indicates that reusable systems are more cost-efficient in high-volume settings, while single-use devices, especially the EU-Scope™, may be advantageous in lower-volume centers. In tertiary centers, the use of single-use fURS represents an excellent opportunity to preserve the durability of reusable fURS, particularly during complex procedures with a high risk of ureteroscope damage.</p>","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":" ","pages":"31-36"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12851814/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145451988","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Quality assessment of robotic repair of benign ureteral strictures A Canadian, single-center experience. 良性输尿管狭窄机器人修复的质量评估:加拿大单中心经验。
IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.9379
William Luke, Archit Jain, Christina Lim, Heather Rotz, Zoe Myers, Reza Lahiji, Patrick P W Luke

Introduction: Endourologic treatments are first-line interventions for short ureteral strictures. With long strictures and endourologic failures, open repair has historically been used; however, robotic-assisted approaches have recently been shown to be effective. As a quality measure, we wanted to assess the performance of robotic ureteral reconstruction compared with open surgical repair during our transition to robotic surgery at a Canadian tertiary care center.

Methods: From 2011-2024, 43 complex ureteral stricture cases (19 open, 24 robotic) were performed. The primary outcome was six-month success defined by a composite of stent/pain-free status and renogram elimination half-life (T½). Secondary outcomes included length of stay, operative time, estimated blood loss, and complications.

Results: Success rates at six months were non-significantly different between robotic and open repair (83% vs. 79%, p=0.36). Length of stay was shorter in the robotic group (3.1±1.9 vs. 4.9±3.3 days, p=0.018). Estimated blood loss (231±84 vs. 244±170 mL, p=0.30) and operative time (220±67 vs. 214±74 minutes, p=0.40) were comparable between groups. Complication rates were similar between groups.

Conclusions: Overall, robotic reconstruction yields equivalent six-month success to open repair, with shorter length of stay. These findings support continuing robotic-assisted ureteral reconstruction as a safe and effective alternative to open surgery, offering equivalent short-term success and reduced hospital stay.

导读:输尿管内腔治疗是短期输尿管狭窄的一线干预措施。对于长狭窄和腔内系统故障,开放修复历来是;然而,机器人辅助的方法最近被证明是有效的。作为一项质量测量,我们希望在加拿大三级医疗中心过渡到机器人手术期间,评估机器人输尿管重建与开放手术修复的性能。方法:2011-2024年对43例复杂输尿管狭窄患者进行手术治疗,其中切开输尿管19例,机器人输尿管24例。主要终点是6个月的成功,由支架/无痛状态和肾图t1 / 2的综合指标来定义。次要结局包括住院时间、手术时间、估计失血量和并发症。结果:6个月的成功率在机器人和开放式修复之间无显著差异(83%对79%,p=0.36)。机器人组住院时间较短(3.1±1.9天和4.9±3.3天,p=0.018)。两组间估计失血量(231±84 vs 244±170 mL, p=0.30)和手术时间(220±67 vs 214±74 min, p=0.40)具有可比性。两组间并发症发生率相似。结论:总的来说,机器人重建的成功率相当于六个月的开放式修复,住院时间更短。这些研究结果支持继续使用机器人辅助输尿管重建术作为开放手术的安全有效的替代方法,具有相同的短期成功和缩短住院时间。
{"title":"Quality assessment of robotic repair of benign ureteral strictures A Canadian, single-center experience.","authors":"William Luke, Archit Jain, Christina Lim, Heather Rotz, Zoe Myers, Reza Lahiji, Patrick P W Luke","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.9379","DOIUrl":"10.5489/cuaj.9379","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endourologic treatments are first-line interventions for short ureteral strictures. With long strictures and endourologic failures, open repair has historically been used; however, robotic-assisted approaches have recently been shown to be effective. As a quality measure, we wanted to assess the performance of robotic ureteral reconstruction compared with open surgical repair during our transition to robotic surgery at a Canadian tertiary care center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 2011-2024, 43 complex ureteral stricture cases (19 open, 24 robotic) were performed. The primary outcome was six-month success defined by a composite of stent/pain-free status and renogram elimination half-life (T½). Secondary outcomes included length of stay, operative time, estimated blood loss, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Success rates at six months were non-significantly different between robotic and open repair (83% vs. 79%, p=0.36). Length of stay was shorter in the robotic group (3.1±1.9 vs. 4.9±3.3 days, p=0.018). Estimated blood loss (231±84 vs. 244±170 mL, p=0.30) and operative time (220±67 vs. 214±74 minutes, p=0.40) were comparable between groups. Complication rates were similar between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, robotic reconstruction yields equivalent six-month success to open repair, with shorter length of stay. These findings support continuing robotic-assisted ureteral reconstruction as a safe and effective alternative to open surgery, offering equivalent short-term success and reduced hospital stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":" ","pages":"57-62"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12851807/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145776335","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How do residency programs differentiate applicants? 住院医师项目如何区分申请人?
IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.9612
Jason Y Lee
{"title":"How do residency programs differentiate applicants?","authors":"Jason Y Lee","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.9612","DOIUrl":"10.5489/cuaj.9612","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":"20 2","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12851808/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146094844","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
CUAJ at 20. 20岁。
IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.9620
Michael Leveridge
{"title":"CUAJ at 20.","authors":"Michael Leveridge","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.9620","DOIUrl":"10.5489/cuaj.9620","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":"20 2","pages":"7-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12851809/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146094920","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Micro-ultrasound transperineal prostate biopsy as an alternative to MRI-US fusion transrectal biopsy. 微超声经会阴前列腺活检作为MRI-US融合经直肠活检的替代方法。
IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.9323
Anna J Black, Quentin Michalchuk, Ahmad Almarzouq, Martin Gleave, Miles P Mannas

Introduction: ExactVu micro-ultrasound generates high-resolution images and promises to improve prostate biopsy performance, while transperineal prostate biopsy (TPB) has gained popularity due to its sterile technique. The aim of this study was to compare TPB using ExactVu to transrectal biopsy (TRB).

Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent TPB (n=306) using ExactVu or TRB (n=392) from 2019-2023 was performed. Clinical parameters were compared between the groups using Chi-squared test. Putative predictors of cancer on biopsy and upgrading on radical prostatectomy were investigated using logistic regression.

Results: More transperineal than transrectal biopsy patients had a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 5 lesion (40% vs. 28%, p=0.001) and were biopsynaive (53% vs. 39%, p<0.001). In patients with no previous diagnosis of prostate cancer, the clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate was higher in the TPB group (53% vs. 42%, p=0.01). Transperineal patients required fewer cores to obtain equal cancer detection rates (11±5 vs. 15±4 cores, p<0.01). Upgrading from grade group 1 to grade group ≥2 on radical prostatectomy was more common with TRB (9.1% vs. 2.1%, p=0.04). Urinary retention rate did not differ by biopsy type and two transrectal but no transperineal patients developed urosepsis.

Conclusions: TPB required fewer cores to obtain a similar clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate when compared to TRB. TPB had fewer complications and a low upgrade rate. This suggests that cognitive fusion TPB using ExactVu is an excellent alternative to software fusion TRB.

简介:ExactVu微超声可产生高分辨率图像,有望提高前列腺活检的性能,而经会阴前列腺活检(TPB)因其无菌技术而受到欢迎。本研究的目的是比较使用ExactVu的TPB和经直肠活检(TRB)。方法:回顾性分析2019-2023年使用ExactVu或TRB进行TPB的患者(n=306)。采用卡方法比较两组临床参数。采用logistic回归对活检和根治性前列腺切除术的推定预测因子进行了研究。结果:经会阴活检的患者比经直肠活检的患者有更多的前列腺成像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS) 5病变(40%对28%,p=0.001)和未活检的患者(53%对39%)。结论:与TRB相比,TPB需要更少的核心来获得相似的具有临床意义的前列腺癌检出率。TPB并发症少,升级率低。这表明使用ExactVu的认知融合TPB是软件融合TRB的优秀替代方案。
{"title":"Micro-ultrasound transperineal prostate biopsy as an alternative to MRI-US fusion transrectal biopsy.","authors":"Anna J Black, Quentin Michalchuk, Ahmad Almarzouq, Martin Gleave, Miles P Mannas","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.9323","DOIUrl":"10.5489/cuaj.9323","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>ExactVu micro-ultrasound generates high-resolution images and promises to improve prostate biopsy performance, while transperineal prostate biopsy (TPB) has gained popularity due to its sterile technique. The aim of this study was to compare TPB using ExactVu to transrectal biopsy (TRB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent TPB (n=306) using ExactVu or TRB (n=392) from 2019-2023 was performed. Clinical parameters were compared between the groups using Chi-squared test. Putative predictors of cancer on biopsy and upgrading on radical prostatectomy were investigated using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More transperineal than transrectal biopsy patients had a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 5 lesion (40% vs. 28%, p=0.001) and were biopsynaive (53% vs. 39%, p<0.001). In patients with no previous diagnosis of prostate cancer, the clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate was higher in the TPB group (53% vs. 42%, p=0.01). Transperineal patients required fewer cores to obtain equal cancer detection rates (11±5 vs. 15±4 cores, p<0.01). Upgrading from grade group 1 to grade group ≥2 on radical prostatectomy was more common with TRB (9.1% vs. 2.1%, p=0.04). Urinary retention rate did not differ by biopsy type and two transrectal but no transperineal patients developed urosepsis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TPB required fewer cores to obtain a similar clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate when compared to TRB. TPB had fewer complications and a low upgrade rate. This suggests that cognitive fusion TPB using ExactVu is an excellent alternative to software fusion TRB.</p>","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":" ","pages":"15-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12851815/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145453136","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Micro-ultrasound in the Canadian prostate cancer diagnostic pathway. 微超声在加拿大前列腺癌诊断途径中的应用。
IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.9607
Braden Millan, Adam Kinnaird
{"title":"Micro-ultrasound in the Canadian prostate cancer diagnostic pathway.","authors":"Braden Millan, Adam Kinnaird","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.9607","DOIUrl":"10.5489/cuaj.9607","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":"20 2","pages":"21-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12851810/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146094847","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association between kidney stones and future risk of kidney cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. 肾结石与肾癌未来风险之间的关系:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-15 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.9394
Naeem Bhojani, Larry E Miller, Samir Bhattacharyya, Kelven W Chen, Panagiotis Kallidonis, Pablo S Contreras, Bhaskar K Somani, Vineet Gauhar, Ben H Chew

Introduction: Despite increasing interest in the potential associations between kidney stones and kidney cancer, their relationship remains incompletely characterized. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the association between a history of kidney stones and the future risk of kidney cancer.

Methods: We systematically searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for observational studies of renal cell carcinoma risk in adults with kidney stones. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to calculate the pooled risk ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI). Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted to assess the associations with study design, data sources, risk of bias, control group type, and sex.

Results: Thirteen studies (five cohort, eight case-control) were included in the meta-analysis. A history of kidney stones was associated with a significantly higher risk of developing kidney cancer (risk ratio 2.36; 95% CI 1.74, 2.98, p<0.001, I2=94%). Subgroup analysis showed a consistently elevated risk of kidney cancer in stone formers across all subgroups. No significant differences were observed between subgroups, except that more recent studies demonstrated significantly stronger associations between stone disease and risk of kidney cancer (p<0.001).

Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrates a significant association between kidney stones and increased risk of kidney cancer, with affected individuals having approximately twice the risk of developing kidney cancer. These findings highlight the importance of enhanced cancer surveillance in patients with a history of kidney stones and suggest the need for further research into shared pathophysiologic mechanisms and potential preventative strategies.

导言:尽管人们对肾结石和肾癌之间的潜在联系越来越感兴趣,但它们之间的关系仍然不完全明确。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了肾结石病史与未来患肾癌风险之间的关系。方法:我们系统地检索了Medline、Embase和Cochrane中央对照试验注册库中有关肾结石患者肾细胞癌风险的观察性研究。随机效应荟萃分析计算合并风险比和95%置信区间(CI)。进行亚组分析和meta回归来评估与研究设计、数据来源、偏倚风险、对照组类型和性别的关联。结果:13项研究(5项队列研究,8项病例对照研究)被纳入meta分析。肾结石病史与患肾癌的风险显著增高相关(风险比2.36;95% CI 1.74, 2.98, p2=94%)。亚组分析显示,在所有亚组中,结石患者患肾癌的风险持续升高。在亚组之间没有观察到显著的差异,除了最近的研究表明肾结石疾病和肾癌风险之间存在显著更强的关联(结论:本荟萃分析表明肾结石和肾癌风险增加之间存在显著关联,受影响的个体患肾癌的风险大约是患肾癌风险的两倍)。这些发现强调了在有肾结石病史的患者中加强癌症监测的重要性,并提示需要进一步研究共同的病理生理机制和潜在的预防策略。
{"title":"Association between kidney stones and future risk of kidney cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Naeem Bhojani, Larry E Miller, Samir Bhattacharyya, Kelven W Chen, Panagiotis Kallidonis, Pablo S Contreras, Bhaskar K Somani, Vineet Gauhar, Ben H Chew","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.9394","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9394","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite increasing interest in the potential associations between kidney stones and kidney cancer, their relationship remains incompletely characterized. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the association between a history of kidney stones and the future risk of kidney cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for observational studies of renal cell carcinoma risk in adults with kidney stones. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to calculate the pooled risk ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI). Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted to assess the associations with study design, data sources, risk of bias, control group type, and sex.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies (five cohort, eight case-control) were included in the meta-analysis. A history of kidney stones was associated with a significantly higher risk of developing kidney cancer (risk ratio 2.36; 95% CI 1.74, 2.98, p<0.001, I<sup>2</sup>=94%). Subgroup analysis showed a consistently elevated risk of kidney cancer in stone formers across all subgroups. No significant differences were observed between subgroups, except that more recent studies demonstrated significantly stronger associations between stone disease and risk of kidney cancer (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis demonstrates a significant association between kidney stones and increased risk of kidney cancer, with affected individuals having approximately twice the risk of developing kidney cancer. These findings highlight the importance of enhanced cancer surveillance in patients with a history of kidney stones and suggest the need for further research into shared pathophysiologic mechanisms and potential preventative strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145776000","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficient blood testing in endourology: A Transfusion Dashboard initiative to minimize unnecessary type and screen tests. 有效的血液检测在泌尿道:输血仪表板倡议,以减少不必要的类型和筛选试验。
IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-15 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.9451
Ghizlane Moussaoui, Emma Piennar, Matthew S Lee, Jacqueline D Trudeau, Connor M Forbes

Introduction: Type and screen testing (T&S) is routinely performed preoperatively for many endoscopic procedures, despite low transfusion rates. While important, T&S can be costly, unnecessary, and burdensome for patients to obtain in a short timeframe due to expiry. We aimed to assess and reduce unnecessary T&S in a safe and collaborative manner through a Transfusion Dashboard. We assessed the effect of reduced testing on patient safety, cost, and the environment.

Methods: This quality improvement study used the Transfusion Dashboard, a web-based, institutional platform tracking blood transfusion trends. During the observation phase (2016-2019), procedure-specific preoperative T&S recommendations were developed. Following implementation of these recommendations in 2020, the incidence of T&S, perioperative transfusion rates, and rescue transfusion rates were assessed pre- and post-intervention using the Chi-squared test. Cost and environmental savings were also evaluated.

Results: From 2016-2023, outcomes were tracked for 4375 pre-initiative and 2488 post-initiative patients who underwent endoscopic procedures. We found a statistically significant decrease in T&S following initiative implementation for transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), holmium e-nucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), and transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) by as much as 51.2%. There was no change in uncrossed or overall blood transfusions. Since the implementation of the initiative, $45 362.81 in testing materials were saved and an associated reduction of 697 kg CO2 was observed.

Conclusions: Institutional- and procedure-specific testing guidelines decreased unnecessary tests, leading to improved resource stewardship, reduced cost, improved patient experience, and environmental savings. Initial modest cost savings and care improvements may be amplified safely in larger organizations and across more procedures.

导言:尽管输血率很低,但许多内镜手术术前常规进行类型和筛查试验(T&S)。虽然T&S很重要,但由于到期,患者在短时间内获得T&S可能成本高昂、不必要且负担沉重。我们旨在通过输血仪表板以安全和协作的方式评估和减少不必要的T&S。我们评估了减少检测对患者安全、成本和环境的影响。方法:这项质量改进研究使用了输血仪表板,这是一个基于网络的跟踪输血趋势的机构平台。在观察阶段(2016-2019年),制定了特定程序的术前T&S建议。在2020年实施这些建议后,使用卡方检验评估干预前和干预后的T&S发生率、围手术期输血率和抢救输血率。成本和环境节约也进行了评估。结果:从2016年到2023年,追踪了4375名接受内窥镜手术的患者术前和术后的结果。我们发现,主动实施经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)、经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)、前列腺钬e成核术(HoLEP)和经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(TURBT)后,T&S的发生率下降了51.2%,具有统计学意义。未交叉或总体输血量没有变化。自实施该倡议以来,节省了45 362.81美元的测试材料,并观察到减少了697公斤二氧化碳。结论:针对机构和程序的检测指南减少了不必要的检测,从而改善了资源管理,降低了成本,改善了患者体验,并节约了环境。最初适度的成本节约和护理改善可能在更大的组织和更多的程序中安全地扩大。
{"title":"Efficient blood testing in endourology: A Transfusion Dashboard initiative to minimize unnecessary type and screen tests.","authors":"Ghizlane Moussaoui, Emma Piennar, Matthew S Lee, Jacqueline D Trudeau, Connor M Forbes","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.9451","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9451","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Type and screen testing (T&S) is routinely performed preoperatively for many endoscopic procedures, despite low transfusion rates. While important, T&S can be costly, unnecessary, and burdensome for patients to obtain in a short timeframe due to expiry. We aimed to assess and reduce unnecessary T&S in a safe and collaborative manner through a Transfusion Dashboard. We assessed the effect of reduced testing on patient safety, cost, and the environment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This quality improvement study used the Transfusion Dashboard, a web-based, institutional platform tracking blood transfusion trends. During the observation phase (2016-2019), procedure-specific preoperative T&S recommendations were developed. Following implementation of these recommendations in 2020, the incidence of T&S, perioperative transfusion rates, and rescue transfusion rates were assessed pre- and post-intervention using the Chi-squared test. Cost and environmental savings were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2016-2023, outcomes were tracked for 4375 pre-initiative and 2488 post-initiative patients who underwent endoscopic procedures. We found a statistically significant decrease in T&S following initiative implementation for transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), holmium e-nucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), and transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) by as much as 51.2%. There was no change in uncrossed or overall blood transfusions. Since the implementation of the initiative, $45 362.81 in testing materials were saved and an associated reduction of 697 kg CO<sub>2</sub> was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Institutional- and procedure-specific testing guidelines decreased unnecessary tests, leading to improved resource stewardship, reduced cost, improved patient experience, and environmental savings. Initial modest cost savings and care improvements may be amplified safely in larger organizations and across more procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145776265","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Does intraoperative difficulty at time of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy predict urinary continence recovery? 机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术时术中困难能否预测尿失禁的恢复?
IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-15 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.9374
Emad Rajih, Abdullah M Alenizi, Mansour Alnazari, Walaa Borhan, Assaad El-Hakim

Introduction: Several studies have reported the preoperative and intraoperative predictors of urinary continence after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP). No studies have addressed the impact of surgeon satisfaction and perceived surgical difficulty on continence recovery after RARP.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of prospectively collected data for patients treated with RARP for clinically organ-confined prostate cancer. Perioperative variables were recorded and studied. Patients were followed with regular visits at one, three, six, 12, and 24 months after surgery. The primary endpoint of the study was time to continence.

Results: A total of 322 patients treated with RARP were included. At least 80% of patients had 24-month postoperative continence followup. Continence rates were 39.1, 58.2, 71.1, 80.9, and 90.7% at one, three, six, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Perceived intermediate and high difficulty cases were associated with lower hazards of continence after RARP compared to low-difficulty cases (hazard ratio [HR] intermediate vs. low: 0.63, p=0.006; HR high vs. low: 0.52, p<0.001). Similarly, increased prostate size and decreased operative time were associated with low hazard of continence after RARP. Conversely, no statistically significant differences were recorded for surgeon satisfaction and preoperative Sexual Health Inventory for Men score (all p>0.05) at multivariate analysis.

Conclusions: Overall difficulty encountered by the surgeon at time of RARP is an independent predictor of continence recovery, in addition to prostate size and preoperative International Prostate Symptoms Score. Predictive preoperative factors for difficult surgery should be dealt with by an experienced surgeon to hasten continence recovery after surgery.

几项研究报道了机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)后尿失禁的术前和术中预测因素。没有研究探讨外科医生满意度和感知手术难度对RARP术后失禁恢复的影响。方法:我们对临床器官局限性前列腺癌患者采用RARP治疗的前瞻性资料进行回顾性研究。记录并研究围手术期变量。术后1个月、3个月、6个月、12个月和24个月对患者进行定期随访。研究的主要终点是尿失禁时间。结果:共纳入322例RARP治疗患者。至少80%的患者术后有24个月的尿失禁随访。1个月、3个月、6个月、12个月和24个月的尿失禁率分别为39.1%、58.2%、71.1%、80.9%和90.7%。多因素分析显示,与低难度病例相比,感知中、高难度病例RARP术后尿失禁的风险较低(风险比[HR]中对低:0.63,p=0.006;风险比高对低:0.52,p0.05)。结论:除前列腺大小和术前国际前列腺症状评分外,RARP时外科医生遇到的总体困难是尿失禁恢复的独立预测因素。术前对困难手术的预测因素应由经验丰富的外科医生处理,以加速术后失禁的恢复。
{"title":"Does intraoperative difficulty at time of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy predict urinary continence recovery?","authors":"Emad Rajih, Abdullah M Alenizi, Mansour Alnazari, Walaa Borhan, Assaad El-Hakim","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.9374","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9374","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Several studies have reported the preoperative and intraoperative predictors of urinary continence after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP). No studies have addressed the impact of surgeon satisfaction and perceived surgical difficulty on continence recovery after RARP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study of prospectively collected data for patients treated with RARP for clinically organ-confined prostate cancer. Perioperative variables were recorded and studied. Patients were followed with regular visits at one, three, six, 12, and 24 months after surgery. The primary endpoint of the study was time to continence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 322 patients treated with RARP were included. At least 80% of patients had 24-month postoperative continence followup. Continence rates were 39.1, 58.2, 71.1, 80.9, and 90.7% at one, three, six, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Perceived intermediate and high difficulty cases were associated with lower hazards of continence after RARP compared to low-difficulty cases (hazard ratio [HR] intermediate vs. low: 0.63, p=0.006; HR high vs. low: 0.52, p<0.001). Similarly, increased prostate size and decreased operative time were associated with low hazard of continence after RARP. Conversely, no statistically significant differences were recorded for surgeon satisfaction and preoperative Sexual Health Inventory for Men score (all p>0.05) at multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall difficulty encountered by the surgeon at time of RARP is an independent predictor of continence recovery, in addition to prostate size and preoperative International Prostate Symptoms Score. Predictive preoperative factors for difficult surgery should be dealt with by an experienced surgeon to hasten continence recovery after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145776332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Implementing HoLEP without fellowship training: A stepwise learning curve from a single surgeon's first 200 cases. 在没有奖学金培训的情况下实施HoLEP:从单个外科医生的前200例病例逐步学习曲线。
IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-15 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.9351
Shayan Smani, Nishan Sohoni, Gregory Lacy, Victoria Kong, Syed N Rahman, Christopher S Hayden, Mursal Gardezi, Michael Jalfon, Daniel S Kellner
{"title":"Implementing HoLEP without fellowship training: A stepwise learning curve from a single surgeon's first 200 cases.","authors":"Shayan Smani, Nishan Sohoni, Gregory Lacy, Victoria Kong, Syed N Rahman, Christopher S Hayden, Mursal Gardezi, Michael Jalfon, Daniel S Kellner","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.9351","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9351","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145776314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1