Pub Date : 2025-12-30DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001355
Phillip Kaasgaard Sperling, Kristian Kjær-Staal Petersen, Allan Vestergaard Danielsen, Bodil Steen Rasmussen, Jannie Bisgaard, Rocco Giordano
Objectives: Postoperative pain is common after Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS). Recent evidence suggest that preoperative inflammatory biomarkers might be associated to chronic postoperative pain following major surgery, but the association between preoperative inflammation and acute pain after VATS have not been examined. This observational cohort study aimed to investigate the association between preoperative inflammatory biomarkers and acute postoperative pain in lung cancer patients undergoing VATS.
Methods: Preoperative plasma samples from cancer patients scheduled for VATS were analyzed for 92 inflammatory markers using the Olink Bioscience inflammation panel. Postoperative pain was measured during the first 48 hours using a numerical rating scale (0-10 point scale). Principal component analysis and Orthogonal Partial Least Square Discriminant Analysis (OPLS-DA) was used to identify important inflammatory markers and combined with preoperative pain and postoperative opioid usage to predict postoperative pain using a multiple linear regression model.
Results: The current study included 92 patients and 41 inflammatory biomarkers passing quality control. OPLS-DA identified 16 important markers. An initial prediction model explained 27.2% of postoperative pain variability, while a condensed model using backwards elimination, explained 34.3% of postoperative pain variability. The condensed model included the inflammatory biomarkers 4E-BP1, STAMBP, MCP-2, VEGFA, and adjusted for postoperative opioid consumption.
Discussion: The current study is the first to demonstrate an association between preoperative inflammatory biomarkers, opioid consumption, and acute postoperative pain after VATS in patients with lung cancer. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings.
{"title":"A Potential Link Between Preoperative Inflammation Biomarkers and Acute Postoperative Pain Following VATS.","authors":"Phillip Kaasgaard Sperling, Kristian Kjær-Staal Petersen, Allan Vestergaard Danielsen, Bodil Steen Rasmussen, Jannie Bisgaard, Rocco Giordano","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001355","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001355","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Postoperative pain is common after Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS). Recent evidence suggest that preoperative inflammatory biomarkers might be associated to chronic postoperative pain following major surgery, but the association between preoperative inflammation and acute pain after VATS have not been examined. This observational cohort study aimed to investigate the association between preoperative inflammatory biomarkers and acute postoperative pain in lung cancer patients undergoing VATS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Preoperative plasma samples from cancer patients scheduled for VATS were analyzed for 92 inflammatory markers using the Olink Bioscience inflammation panel. Postoperative pain was measured during the first 48 hours using a numerical rating scale (0-10 point scale). Principal component analysis and Orthogonal Partial Least Square Discriminant Analysis (OPLS-DA) was used to identify important inflammatory markers and combined with preoperative pain and postoperative opioid usage to predict postoperative pain using a multiple linear regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The current study included 92 patients and 41 inflammatory biomarkers passing quality control. OPLS-DA identified 16 important markers. An initial prediction model explained 27.2% of postoperative pain variability, while a condensed model using backwards elimination, explained 34.3% of postoperative pain variability. The condensed model included the inflammatory biomarkers 4E-BP1, STAMBP, MCP-2, VEGFA, and adjusted for postoperative opioid consumption.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The current study is the first to demonstrate an association between preoperative inflammatory biomarkers, opioid consumption, and acute postoperative pain after VATS in patients with lung cancer. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145866665","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-19DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001354
Michelle A Clementi, Michelle Harmon, Emily F Law, Sarah D E Perzow, Lauren B Shomaker, Talia Thompson
Objectives: Adolescents with chronic migraine face increased risk for comorbid anxiety and depression, which can hinder migraine self-management and coping. Mindfulness-based interventions may reduce anxiety/depression to improve migraine outcomes yet require tailoring to increase acceptability and engagement among this distinct population. The current study used qualitative methods to explore multi-informant perspectives on the illness experience and unique intervention content/delivery needs, with the goal of informing adaptations to mindfulness-based interventions for adolescents with chronic migraine.
Methods: Fifteen interest holders, representing adolescents with chronic migraine, their parents, and healthcare providers, completed semi-structured interviews assessing experiences with chronic migraine, the role of stress and emotions, attitudes toward mindfulness, and perspectives on a telehealth group mindfulness-based program. Interviews were transcribed and coded using a team-based thematic approach.
Results: Data revealed four major themes informing adaptations to mindfulness-based interventions for adolescents with chronic migraine: supporting engagement in mindfulness in the context of migraine pain, incorporating lived experience in intervention content, facilitating peer connections, and providing opportunities for parental involvement. Qualitative results were integrated with content expert input to develop specific adaptation recommendations for mindfulness-based interventions for adolescents with chronic migraine.
Discussion: Acknowledging and addressing the challenges of practicing mindfulness in the context of pain and targeting the isolating experience of chronic migraine by offering peer connection via group intervention delivery may offer unique ways to tailor mindfulness-based interventions for adolescents with chronic migraine. Adaptations may improve intervention fit, acceptability, and retention and should be tested in future clinical trials.
{"title":"Using Multi-Informant Qualitative Data to Inform Adaptations to Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Adolescents with Chronic Migraine.","authors":"Michelle A Clementi, Michelle Harmon, Emily F Law, Sarah D E Perzow, Lauren B Shomaker, Talia Thompson","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001354","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001354","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Adolescents with chronic migraine face increased risk for comorbid anxiety and depression, which can hinder migraine self-management and coping. Mindfulness-based interventions may reduce anxiety/depression to improve migraine outcomes yet require tailoring to increase acceptability and engagement among this distinct population. The current study used qualitative methods to explore multi-informant perspectives on the illness experience and unique intervention content/delivery needs, with the goal of informing adaptations to mindfulness-based interventions for adolescents with chronic migraine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen interest holders, representing adolescents with chronic migraine, their parents, and healthcare providers, completed semi-structured interviews assessing experiences with chronic migraine, the role of stress and emotions, attitudes toward mindfulness, and perspectives on a telehealth group mindfulness-based program. Interviews were transcribed and coded using a team-based thematic approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data revealed four major themes informing adaptations to mindfulness-based interventions for adolescents with chronic migraine: supporting engagement in mindfulness in the context of migraine pain, incorporating lived experience in intervention content, facilitating peer connections, and providing opportunities for parental involvement. Qualitative results were integrated with content expert input to develop specific adaptation recommendations for mindfulness-based interventions for adolescents with chronic migraine.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Acknowledging and addressing the challenges of practicing mindfulness in the context of pain and targeting the isolating experience of chronic migraine by offering peer connection via group intervention delivery may offer unique ways to tailor mindfulness-based interventions for adolescents with chronic migraine. Adaptations may improve intervention fit, acceptability, and retention and should be tested in future clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145821838","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-15DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001353
Amy L Holley, Sydnee Stoyles, Nathan F Dieckmann, Jessica Heierle, Jacqueline R O'Brien, Robert Edwards, Tonya M Palermo, Anna C Wilson
Objective: Acute musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries are common in youth and prior research has identified somatosensory experiences such as conditioned pain modulation (CPM) as a predictor of the transition from acute to chronic pain. Prior pediatric studies are limited by small samples, single quantitative sensory testing (QST) modalities, and short-term follow-up, so the utility of QST in predicting longer-term pain outcomes following acute injury is unknown. To fill this gap, we examined somatosensory function in the acute pain period as a predictor of pain outcomes over 12 months.
Methods: Participants were 226 youth (and a caregiver) taking part in a prospective longitudinal study. Youth completed a QST battery (pain threshold, pain tolerance, temporal summation, and CPM) at baseline (post-injury), and questionnaires assessing pain (average pain, movement-evoked pain; MEP) at three timepoints over 12 months.
Results: A subset of youth developed persistent pain (≥3/0-10 NRS) at 3 months (15-21% depending on pain measure). Regression models indicated CPM was the sole QST measure that predicted pain intensity and persistence at 3 months (both average and MEP). No QST measures predicted pain outcomes at 12 months. Female sex was associated with pain persistence in multiple models.
Discussion: CPM in the acute pain period is a potential marker for short-term pain outcomes. Future research can examine the utility of using QST in predicting pain outcomes in other pediatric pain samples (e.g., non-MSK locations, more severe injuries) and can expand assessment of MEP using standardized performance tasks.
{"title":"Somatosensory Function and Pain: Associations Over 12 Months post-injury in Youth with Acute Musculoskeletal Pain.","authors":"Amy L Holley, Sydnee Stoyles, Nathan F Dieckmann, Jessica Heierle, Jacqueline R O'Brien, Robert Edwards, Tonya M Palermo, Anna C Wilson","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001353","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001353","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Acute musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries are common in youth and prior research has identified somatosensory experiences such as conditioned pain modulation (CPM) as a predictor of the transition from acute to chronic pain. Prior pediatric studies are limited by small samples, single quantitative sensory testing (QST) modalities, and short-term follow-up, so the utility of QST in predicting longer-term pain outcomes following acute injury is unknown. To fill this gap, we examined somatosensory function in the acute pain period as a predictor of pain outcomes over 12 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 226 youth (and a caregiver) taking part in a prospective longitudinal study. Youth completed a QST battery (pain threshold, pain tolerance, temporal summation, and CPM) at baseline (post-injury), and questionnaires assessing pain (average pain, movement-evoked pain; MEP) at three timepoints over 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A subset of youth developed persistent pain (≥3/0-10 NRS) at 3 months (15-21% depending on pain measure). Regression models indicated CPM was the sole QST measure that predicted pain intensity and persistence at 3 months (both average and MEP). No QST measures predicted pain outcomes at 12 months. Female sex was associated with pain persistence in multiple models.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>CPM in the acute pain period is a potential marker for short-term pain outcomes. Future research can examine the utility of using QST in predicting pain outcomes in other pediatric pain samples (e.g., non-MSK locations, more severe injuries) and can expand assessment of MEP using standardized performance tasks.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145758282","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-10DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001351
Jingyi Xie, Zhenying Zhang, Jindong Guo
Objective: To compare the relative efficacy of common non-pharmacological treatments for migraine and to determine the optimal dosage for physical exercise.
Methods: We searched four databases up to January 2025 for randomized controlled trials of non-pharmacological interventions for migraine. A multilevel network meta-analysis, integrated with a dose-response analysis, was conducted to compare intervention efficacy and determine the optimal exercise dosage. Treatments were ranked by the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking curve. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed the risk of bias.
Results: Fifty-nine randomized controlled trials involving 10,020 participants (78.1%, female) were included. Neuromodulation techniques were most effective (Hedges'g=-0.61, 95% Credible Interval: -0.89 to -0.33), followed by physical exercise (Hedges'g=-0.42, 95% Credible Interval: -0.67 to -0.18) and mindfulness meditation (Hedges'g=-0.38, 95% Credible Interval: -0.63 to -0.12). The dose-response analysis for exercise indicated that while 100 metabolic equivalent (MET)-minutes per session was statistically effective, a minimum of 110 MET-minutes per session was required to achieve the Minimal Clinically Important Difference. Efficacy reached an optimal therapeutic plateau at 250-300 MET-minutes per session, achievable with 3-5 weekly sessions of 30-40 minutes.
Discussion: Neuromodulation, physical exercise, and mindfulness meditation are promising non-pharmacological therapies for migraine. For physical exercise, a minimum dose of 110 MET-minutes per session is needed for clinically significant effects, with an optimal therapeutic window at 250-300 MET-minutes per session. Due to the low quality of primary evidence, these findings warrant cautious interpretation and require future validation.
目的:比较偏头痛常用非药物治疗方法的相对疗效,确定体育锻炼的最佳剂量。方法:我们检索了截至2025年1月的四个数据库,以获取偏头痛非药物干预的随机对照试验。采用多水平网络荟萃分析,结合剂量-反应分析,比较干预效果并确定最佳运动剂量。在累积排序曲线下按表面对处理进行排序。两名独立审稿人提取数据并评估偏倚风险。结果:纳入59项随机对照试验,共10020名受试者(78.1%为女性)。神经调节技术最有效(Hedges'g=-0.61, 95%可信区间:-0.89至-0.33),其次是体育锻炼(Hedges'g=-0.42, 95%可信区间:-0.67至-0.18)和正念冥想(Hedges'g=-0.38, 95%可信区间:-0.63至-0.12)。运动的剂量反应分析表明,虽然每次运动100代谢当量(MET)分钟在统计学上是有效的,但每次运动至少需要110 MET分钟才能达到最小临床重要差异。每次治疗250-300 met -分钟时达到最佳治疗平台,每周3-5次,每次30-40分钟即可实现。讨论:神经调节、体育锻炼和正念冥想是非药物治疗偏头痛的有效方法。对于体育锻炼来说,每次锻炼的最低剂量为110 met -分钟,才能产生显著的临床效果,每次锻炼的最佳治疗时间为250-300 met -分钟。由于主要证据的质量较低,这些发现需要谨慎的解释,需要未来的验证。
{"title":"Multilevel Network Meta-Analysis of Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Migraine: Focusing on the Dose-Effect of Physical Exercise and Its Moderators.","authors":"Jingyi Xie, Zhenying Zhang, Jindong Guo","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001351","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001351","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the relative efficacy of common non-pharmacological treatments for migraine and to determine the optimal dosage for physical exercise.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched four databases up to January 2025 for randomized controlled trials of non-pharmacological interventions for migraine. A multilevel network meta-analysis, integrated with a dose-response analysis, was conducted to compare intervention efficacy and determine the optimal exercise dosage. Treatments were ranked by the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking curve. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed the risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-nine randomized controlled trials involving 10,020 participants (78.1%, female) were included. Neuromodulation techniques were most effective (Hedges'g=-0.61, 95% Credible Interval: -0.89 to -0.33), followed by physical exercise (Hedges'g=-0.42, 95% Credible Interval: -0.67 to -0.18) and mindfulness meditation (Hedges'g=-0.38, 95% Credible Interval: -0.63 to -0.12). The dose-response analysis for exercise indicated that while 100 metabolic equivalent (MET)-minutes per session was statistically effective, a minimum of 110 MET-minutes per session was required to achieve the Minimal Clinically Important Difference. Efficacy reached an optimal therapeutic plateau at 250-300 MET-minutes per session, achievable with 3-5 weekly sessions of 30-40 minutes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Neuromodulation, physical exercise, and mindfulness meditation are promising non-pharmacological therapies for migraine. For physical exercise, a minimum dose of 110 MET-minutes per session is needed for clinically significant effects, with an optimal therapeutic window at 250-300 MET-minutes per session. Due to the low quality of primary evidence, these findings warrant cautious interpretation and require future validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145716567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-10DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001350
Juan P Sanabria-Mazo, Iago Giné-Vázquez, Jaime Navarrete, Estíbaliz Royuela-Colomer, Borja M Fernández-Félix, Carlos Suso-Ribera, Azucena García-Palacios, Lance M McCracken, Stefan Schneider, Juan V Luciano
Objectives: The average level of outcomes is the most used index for assessing the efficacy of psychological therapies; however, emerging evidence suggests that it may not fully capture the complexity of treatment effects. This study compared the effects of third-wave cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) on pain-related outcomes (pain intensity, pain interference, sleep disturbance, and depressed mood) using six indices: average level, variability, maximum level, minimum level, frequency in high, and frequency in low.
Methods: Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data were collected within a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that evaluated the addition of remote-delivered third-wave CBT to treatment-as-usual (TAU) in individuals with chronic low back pain plus depressive symptoms. A total of 82 participants (CBT = 50 and TAU = 32) provided 4,595 EMA data points over 10 weeks (70 days).
Results: Compared to TAU, third-wave CBT was generally associated with greater improvement across the pain-related outcomes. Frequency in low emerged as the most sensitive index for change in pain interference and depressed mood; in contrast, the average level showed limited sensitivity. The maximum level also captured some between-group differences for sleep disturbance and depressed mood. The remaining indices (variability, minimum, and frequency in high) did not consistently provide additional value.
Discussion: These findings suggest that the frequency in low may be a sensitive and clinically informative index for detecting treatment effects in RCTs using EMA. Nevertheless, further research is needed to establish its reliability and generalizability across clinical contexts and clinical trial designs.
目的:结果平均水平是评价心理治疗效果最常用的指标;然而,新出现的证据表明,它可能无法完全反映治疗效果的复杂性。本研究比较了第三波认知行为疗法(CBT)对疼痛相关结果(疼痛强度、疼痛干扰、睡眠障碍和抑郁情绪)的影响,采用六个指标:平均水平、可变性、最高水平、最低水平、高频率和低频率。方法:在一项随机对照试验(RCT)中收集生态瞬时评估(EMA)数据,该试验评估了在慢性腰痛合并抑郁症状患者的常规治疗(TAU)中添加远程递送的第三波CBT。共有82名参与者(CBT = 50, TAU = 32)在10周(70天)内提供了4,595个EMA数据点。结果:与TAU相比,第三波CBT通常在疼痛相关结果方面有更大的改善。低频率是疼痛干扰和抑郁情绪变化的最敏感指标;相比之下,平均水平显示有限的灵敏度。最高水平也反映了睡眠障碍和抑郁情绪的组间差异。其余的指数(变异性、最小值和高频率)并没有一致地提供额外的价值。讨论:这些发现提示,在使用EMA的随机对照试验中,低频率可能是检测治疗效果的敏感和临床信息指标。然而,需要进一步的研究来确定其在临床背景和临床试验设计中的可靠性和普遍性。
{"title":"An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study Examining the Efficacy of Third-wave Cognitive Behavioral Therapies on Different Indices of Pain-related Outcomes.","authors":"Juan P Sanabria-Mazo, Iago Giné-Vázquez, Jaime Navarrete, Estíbaliz Royuela-Colomer, Borja M Fernández-Félix, Carlos Suso-Ribera, Azucena García-Palacios, Lance M McCracken, Stefan Schneider, Juan V Luciano","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001350","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001350","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The average level of outcomes is the most used index for assessing the efficacy of psychological therapies; however, emerging evidence suggests that it may not fully capture the complexity of treatment effects. This study compared the effects of third-wave cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) on pain-related outcomes (pain intensity, pain interference, sleep disturbance, and depressed mood) using six indices: average level, variability, maximum level, minimum level, frequency in high, and frequency in low.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data were collected within a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that evaluated the addition of remote-delivered third-wave CBT to treatment-as-usual (TAU) in individuals with chronic low back pain plus depressive symptoms. A total of 82 participants (CBT = 50 and TAU = 32) provided 4,595 EMA data points over 10 weeks (70 days).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to TAU, third-wave CBT was generally associated with greater improvement across the pain-related outcomes. Frequency in low emerged as the most sensitive index for change in pain interference and depressed mood; in contrast, the average level showed limited sensitivity. The maximum level also captured some between-group differences for sleep disturbance and depressed mood. The remaining indices (variability, minimum, and frequency in high) did not consistently provide additional value.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings suggest that the frequency in low may be a sensitive and clinically informative index for detecting treatment effects in RCTs using EMA. Nevertheless, further research is needed to establish its reliability and generalizability across clinical contexts and clinical trial designs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145716513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-05DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001352
Nav La, Schawanya K Rattanapitoon, Chutharat Thanchonnang, Nathkapach K Rattanapitoon
{"title":"Re-examining the Mechanistic and Translational Horizons of taVNS for Post-Thoracoscopic Pain: Commentary on Zhang et al.","authors":"Nav La, Schawanya K Rattanapitoon, Chutharat Thanchonnang, Nathkapach K Rattanapitoon","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001352","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001352","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145907205","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-04DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001348
Yuhan Lou, Jiawen Wu
{"title":"Letter to the Editor Regarding: Dexmedetomidine Versus Magnesium Sulfate in Ultrasound-Guided Bilateral Bi-Level Erector Spinae Plane Block in Corrective Scoliosis Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.","authors":"Yuhan Lou, Jiawen Wu","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001348","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001348","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145670846","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001329
Lisa R Miller-Matero, Emily P Morris, Brittany Christopher, Celeste Pappas, Timothy Chrusciel, Joanne Salas, Lauren Wilson, Scott Secrest, Mark D Sullivan, Ryan W Carpenter, Patrick J Lustman, Brian K Ahmedani, Jeffrey F Scherrer
Objective: Individuals receiving opioids for pain management are at risk for negative outcomes. However, it is not clear whether social determinants of health (SDOH) predict outcomes a year after starting a prescription opioid. The purpose was to examine associations between SDOH with psychiatric-related, pain-related, and opioid-related outcomes at a 12-month follow-up.
Methods: Participants (N=783) with a new period of 30 to 90-day opioid use completed baseline and 12-month follow-up questionnaires regarding SDOH, depressive symptoms, pain severity, pain interference, and opioid use. Multivariate adjusted models estimated the association between SDOH and outcomes.
Results: Participants had a mean age of 53.4 years (SD=11.9), 71.2% White race, and 69.9% women. Older age (OR=0.97; 0.95, 0.99) and Black race (OR=0.45; 0.27, 0.76) were inversely associated with depression, while being widowed/divorced/separated (OR=1.72; 1.01, 2.91) and lacking a college education (OR=2.43; 1.25, 4.73) were positively associated with depression. Women (OR=1.56; 1.12, 2.18) and lower income (OR=2.09; 1.14, 3.85) were associated with greater odds of opioid use, while unemployment was associated with lower odds of opioid use at 12 months (OR=0.55; 0.34, 0.89). Older age (OR=0.95; 0.91, 0.99) was inversely associated with opioid use concerns while disability (OR=4.59; 1.60, 13.11) was positively associated.
Discussion: Several SDOH variables were associated with poorer functioning at baseline and 12 months after individuals were prescribed an opioid. It may be useful for clinicians to screen for SDOH to identify higher-risk individuals.
{"title":"Social Determinants of Health Among Individuals Receiving Opioids for Pain Management.","authors":"Lisa R Miller-Matero, Emily P Morris, Brittany Christopher, Celeste Pappas, Timothy Chrusciel, Joanne Salas, Lauren Wilson, Scott Secrest, Mark D Sullivan, Ryan W Carpenter, Patrick J Lustman, Brian K Ahmedani, Jeffrey F Scherrer","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001329","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001329","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Individuals receiving opioids for pain management are at risk for negative outcomes. However, it is not clear whether social determinants of health (SDOH) predict outcomes a year after starting a prescription opioid. The purpose was to examine associations between SDOH with psychiatric-related, pain-related, and opioid-related outcomes at a 12-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (N=783) with a new period of 30 to 90-day opioid use completed baseline and 12-month follow-up questionnaires regarding SDOH, depressive symptoms, pain severity, pain interference, and opioid use. Multivariate adjusted models estimated the association between SDOH and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants had a mean age of 53.4 years (SD=11.9), 71.2% White race, and 69.9% women. Older age (OR=0.97; 0.95, 0.99) and Black race (OR=0.45; 0.27, 0.76) were inversely associated with depression, while being widowed/divorced/separated (OR=1.72; 1.01, 2.91) and lacking a college education (OR=2.43; 1.25, 4.73) were positively associated with depression. Women (OR=1.56; 1.12, 2.18) and lower income (OR=2.09; 1.14, 3.85) were associated with greater odds of opioid use, while unemployment was associated with lower odds of opioid use at 12 months (OR=0.55; 0.34, 0.89). Older age (OR=0.95; 0.91, 0.99) was inversely associated with opioid use concerns while disability (OR=4.59; 1.60, 13.11) was positively associated.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Several SDOH variables were associated with poorer functioning at baseline and 12 months after individuals were prescribed an opioid. It may be useful for clinicians to screen for SDOH to identify higher-risk individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12603668/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145187537","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives: To identify evidence for pain assessment during acute procedures in hospitalized neonates at risk of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS).
Methods: This scoping review was conducted using the JBI scoping review methodology. The search strategy focused on identifying in-patient neonates undergoing acute painful procedures. Databases searched are MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycInfo, and Scopus. The relevant data were extracted by 2 reviewers and the results were summarized in a narrative description and presented in a tabular format, including the components of participants, concept, and context.
Results: A total of 22,731 unique studies were screened, with 5 studies ultimately included. Of these studies, 2 included neonates at risk of NOWS but did not report pain responses separately. The 3 remaining studies observed procedural pain in opioid-exposed neonates compared with neonates without opioid exposure during heel lance. Pain assessment methods included physiological responses and validated composite pain scores. When using composite pain tools, 1 study showed higher pain response in opioid-exposed neonates, while the other 2 studies showed the same or lower pain response. For skin conductance, the findings from 2 studies were discrepant, with 1 study reporting higher pain response in opioid-exposed neonates and the other showing no statistically significant difference.
Discussion: There is a need for more studies designed to examine the influence of opioid exposure and withdrawal on pain responding and management in neonates. As there is currently limited evidence to guide clinical care, clinicians should continue to use validated composite pain assessment tools and pain management strategies.
{"title":"Procedural Pain Assessments for Neonates at Risk of Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Julianna Lavergne, Erin Langman, Deborah Mansell, Justine Dol, Britney Benoit","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001325","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001325","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify evidence for pain assessment during acute procedures in hospitalized neonates at risk of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review was conducted using the JBI scoping review methodology. The search strategy focused on identifying in-patient neonates undergoing acute painful procedures. Databases searched are MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycInfo, and Scopus. The relevant data were extracted by 2 reviewers and the results were summarized in a narrative description and presented in a tabular format, including the components of participants, concept, and context.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 22,731 unique studies were screened, with 5 studies ultimately included. Of these studies, 2 included neonates at risk of NOWS but did not report pain responses separately. The 3 remaining studies observed procedural pain in opioid-exposed neonates compared with neonates without opioid exposure during heel lance. Pain assessment methods included physiological responses and validated composite pain scores. When using composite pain tools, 1 study showed higher pain response in opioid-exposed neonates, while the other 2 studies showed the same or lower pain response. For skin conductance, the findings from 2 studies were discrepant, with 1 study reporting higher pain response in opioid-exposed neonates and the other showing no statistically significant difference.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>There is a need for more studies designed to examine the influence of opioid exposure and withdrawal on pain responding and management in neonates. As there is currently limited evidence to guide clinical care, clinicians should continue to use validated composite pain assessment tools and pain management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145087988","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}