Bali Sharma, Nazim Nasir, Amani Alhazmi, Beena Bridget, Maha Ali
Effective anatomy education is critical for preparing medical students for clinical tasks such as surgical planning and radiological interpretation. Traditional chalkboard teaching and modern 3D printed models offer distinct approaches, yet their comparative pedagogical impact remains underexplored. This study evaluates chalkboard, 3D printed model, and hybrid teaching methods to optimize anatomy learning for clinical applications like coronary artery mapping and neurosurgery planning. A quasi-experimental study involved 120 undergraduate medical students randomly assigned to three groups (n = 40 each) for a 15-week intervention: chalkboard (lectures with 2D diagrams), 3D printed models (hands-on learning with patient-specific models, e.g., 3D printed heart for angioplasty), and hybrid (integrating both, model-first sequence). Outcomes were assessed via a 20-item anatomy quiz (skeletal, cardiovascular, neuroanatomy, muscular domains), a 30-item pre- and post-activity questionnaire (5-point Likert scale, knowledge, engagement, clarity), qualitative interviews (n = 28, hybrid group), and the Pedagogical Visualization Index (PVI). Data were analyzed using ANOVA, paired t-tests, and thematic analysis. The hybrid group outperforms others, with superior knowledge gain (81.8%, p < 0.001), engagement (4.4 ± 0.4), clarity (4.6 ± 0.3), and PVI (0.830) compared to 3D models (PVI: 0.720) and chalkboard (PVI: 0.543), excelling in cardiovascular (84%, e.g., coronary artery mapping) and neuroanatomy (85%, e.g., cranial nerve localization). Model-first sequencing enhances outcomes (PVI: 0.86, p = 0.03). Qualitative themes (78%) emphasize visualization for clinical reasoning (e.g., femoral artery mapping for vascular surgery). Additionally, the hybrid method demonstrates versatility across specialties, with students achieving high clarity (4.7 ± 0.2) in neurosurgery (e.g., optic nerve tracing for aneurysm clipping), precision (88%) in radiology (e.g., lung segmentation for pulmonary embolism), and engagement (4.6 ± 0.2) in orthopedics (e.g., ACL reconstruction), supported by tactile feedback from 3D models like the knee and congenital heart models for pediatric surgery (clarity 4.9 ± 0.1). The hybrid method, leveraging 3D printed models, optimizes anatomy learning for clinical tasks, supporting adoption in resource-limited curricula. Future research should validate findings with larger cohorts and objective clinical assessments.
{"title":"Visualizing Anatomy: Comparing the Pedagogical Impact of Chalkboard Teaching and 3D Models.","authors":"Bali Sharma, Nazim Nasir, Amani Alhazmi, Beena Bridget, Maha Ali","doi":"10.1002/ca.70055","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.70055","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effective anatomy education is critical for preparing medical students for clinical tasks such as surgical planning and radiological interpretation. Traditional chalkboard teaching and modern 3D printed models offer distinct approaches, yet their comparative pedagogical impact remains underexplored. This study evaluates chalkboard, 3D printed model, and hybrid teaching methods to optimize anatomy learning for clinical applications like coronary artery mapping and neurosurgery planning. A quasi-experimental study involved 120 undergraduate medical students randomly assigned to three groups (n = 40 each) for a 15-week intervention: chalkboard (lectures with 2D diagrams), 3D printed models (hands-on learning with patient-specific models, e.g., 3D printed heart for angioplasty), and hybrid (integrating both, model-first sequence). Outcomes were assessed via a 20-item anatomy quiz (skeletal, cardiovascular, neuroanatomy, muscular domains), a 30-item pre- and post-activity questionnaire (5-point Likert scale, knowledge, engagement, clarity), qualitative interviews (n = 28, hybrid group), and the Pedagogical Visualization Index (PVI). Data were analyzed using ANOVA, paired t-tests, and thematic analysis. The hybrid group outperforms others, with superior knowledge gain (81.8%, p < 0.001), engagement (4.4 ± 0.4), clarity (4.6 ± 0.3), and PVI (0.830) compared to 3D models (PVI: 0.720) and chalkboard (PVI: 0.543), excelling in cardiovascular (84%, e.g., coronary artery mapping) and neuroanatomy (85%, e.g., cranial nerve localization). Model-first sequencing enhances outcomes (PVI: 0.86, p = 0.03). Qualitative themes (78%) emphasize visualization for clinical reasoning (e.g., femoral artery mapping for vascular surgery). Additionally, the hybrid method demonstrates versatility across specialties, with students achieving high clarity (4.7 ± 0.2) in neurosurgery (e.g., optic nerve tracing for aneurysm clipping), precision (88%) in radiology (e.g., lung segmentation for pulmonary embolism), and engagement (4.6 ± 0.2) in orthopedics (e.g., ACL reconstruction), supported by tactile feedback from 3D models like the knee and congenital heart models for pediatric surgery (clarity 4.9 ± 0.1). The hybrid method, leveraging 3D printed models, optimizes anatomy learning for clinical tasks, supporting adoption in resource-limited curricula. Future research should validate findings with larger cohorts and objective clinical assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":50687,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Anatomy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145726619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Paxton, a British surgeon, is best known for his influential anatomical textbook An Introduction to the Study of Human Anatomy (1831, 1844). Admitted as a Member of the Royal College of Surgeons in 1810 and later awarded an M.D. from the University of St Andrews in 1845, Paxton began his career as an army surgeon before establishing successful practices in Long Buckley, Oxford, and later Rugby. He also served as assistant-surgeon to the Oxfordshire militia. A skilled educator and writer, Paxton published several well-received medical works, including The Medical Friend (1843) and Living Streams (1855), and edited William Paley's Natural Theology. Known for combining anatomical precision with clear illustration and moral insight, Paxton was regarded as both a devoted physician and a man of deep religious conviction. He died at Ledwell House, Oxfordshire, in 1860 (Dictionary of National Biography 1895).
I believe both James Paxton and Matthew Baillie would have been avid readers of Clinical Anatomy. This first issue of 2026 contains interesting articles, including historical, educational, and original papers with relevance to the clinical anatomist. As always, we welcome comments from our readers on how to improve our Journal.
{"title":"The Human Frame… a Knowledge of Which Is the Very Foundation of Medical Science","authors":"R. Shane Tubbs","doi":"10.1002/ca.70056","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ca.70056","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Paxton, a British surgeon, is best known for his influential anatomical textbook <i>An Introduction to the Study of Human Anatomy</i> (1831, <span>1844</span>). Admitted as a Member of the Royal College of Surgeons in 1810 and later awarded an M.D. from the University of St Andrews in 1845, Paxton began his career as an army surgeon before establishing successful practices in Long Buckley, Oxford, and later Rugby. He also served as assistant-surgeon to the Oxfordshire militia. A skilled educator and writer, Paxton published several well-received medical works, including <i>The Medical Friend</i> (1843) and <i>Living Streams</i> (1855), and edited William Paley's <i>Natural Theology</i>. Known for combining anatomical precision with clear illustration and moral insight, Paxton was regarded as both a devoted physician and a man of deep religious conviction. He died at Ledwell House, Oxfordshire, in 1860 (Dictionary of National Biography <span>1895</span>).</p><p>I believe both James Paxton and Matthew Baillie would have been avid readers of <i>Clinical Anatomy</i>. This first issue of 2026 contains interesting articles, including historical, educational, and original papers with relevance to the clinical anatomist. As always, we welcome comments from our readers on how to improve our Journal.</p>","PeriodicalId":50687,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Anatomy","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ca.70056","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145670370","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Dennis M Cullinane, Angielee Niblett, Reinhard M Knerr, Jennifer Coulombe, Edward Kwasnik, Cynthia McDermott, Harvey Cantor, Dan Roe, Valeria Robayo, Zoe Ingram, Massoud Sharif, Stephen C Moye, Dana Stearns
The greater omentum is a thin sheet-like abdominal organ sandwiched between the anterior abdominal wall and the intestines. It possesses adipose deposits, an epiploic vascular system, arcade-like vascular loops, and a significant number of omental milky spots, the name given to the immune/lymphatic cell clusters residing in its tissues. Observational and experimental evidence confirms that the omentum moves toward inflamed abdominal organs and surgical sites and invades via vascular and fibrous tissues, in order to isolate the area and launch an immune response. Correlated to this, direct evidence of omental growth in response to inflammatory chemokine stimuli has also been established. Further, it has been demonstrated that the metabolic activity of the milky spots, when engaged in such a response, increases 10-20 fold, along with increases in the number and size of the spots. A mechanism of chemotaxis has yet to be identified, but it is clear that the omentum is an important immunological organ that responds to inflammation and infection in the abdomen, both cellularly and physically. We propose that the blood vessels of the omentum act as a multi-pronged hydrostat system, engorging themselves and their capillaries with blood, responding to an inflammatory trigger like inflated fire hoses, and extending the organ across the abdomen. Thus, the omentum represents an unique mobile immune system that we believe warrants further focus in anatomical, clinical, immunological, and biomechanical research.
{"title":"The Greater Omentum: A Proposed Mechanism of Movement in the Abdomen.","authors":"Dennis M Cullinane, Angielee Niblett, Reinhard M Knerr, Jennifer Coulombe, Edward Kwasnik, Cynthia McDermott, Harvey Cantor, Dan Roe, Valeria Robayo, Zoe Ingram, Massoud Sharif, Stephen C Moye, Dana Stearns","doi":"10.1002/ca.70051","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.70051","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The greater omentum is a thin sheet-like abdominal organ sandwiched between the anterior abdominal wall and the intestines. It possesses adipose deposits, an epiploic vascular system, arcade-like vascular loops, and a significant number of omental milky spots, the name given to the immune/lymphatic cell clusters residing in its tissues. Observational and experimental evidence confirms that the omentum moves toward inflamed abdominal organs and surgical sites and invades via vascular and fibrous tissues, in order to isolate the area and launch an immune response. Correlated to this, direct evidence of omental growth in response to inflammatory chemokine stimuli has also been established. Further, it has been demonstrated that the metabolic activity of the milky spots, when engaged in such a response, increases 10-20 fold, along with increases in the number and size of the spots. A mechanism of chemotaxis has yet to be identified, but it is clear that the omentum is an important immunological organ that responds to inflammation and infection in the abdomen, both cellularly and physically. We propose that the blood vessels of the omentum act as a multi-pronged hydrostat system, engorging themselves and their capillaries with blood, responding to an inflammatory trigger like inflated fire hoses, and extending the organ across the abdomen. Thus, the omentum represents an unique mobile immune system that we believe warrants further focus in anatomical, clinical, immunological, and biomechanical research.</p>","PeriodicalId":50687,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Anatomy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145670395","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The use of human donor bodies for anatomical examination in the United Kingdom is regulated by the Human Tissue Authority (England, Wales, and Northern Ireland) and His Majesty's Inspector of Anatomy for Scotland. This study aimed to assess the variability of information provided to body donors and the associated consent forms across UK anatomy institutions. A total of 24 consent forms and information booklets were collected from all body donation programs across the UK. Building on previous research, each document was assessed against a checklist covering general information about the donation process, purposes and locations of body use, consent requirements, disposition of remains, and accessibility. The analysis revealed significant heterogeneity in the information provided. The findings suggest a need for standardization of body donation information and consent forms to ensure they meet ethical requirements for informed consent and to improve accessibility and inclusivity. Recommendations include ensuring consistency between information provided and consent forms, requiring confirmation of reading the information, standardizing age limits and medical condition statements, providing clear information for next of kin, and ensuring ethical oversight by institutional committees. Further research is needed on donors' perspectives regarding specific aspects of the donation process. These recommendations are proposed to provide a more consistent approach to sharing information about body donation, ultimately suggesting the development of a single, collaboratively produced form and information pack to minimize customization (and thus omissions).
{"title":"Variability in UK Body Donation Information: A Comparison of Bequeathal Information and Consent Forms With Recommendations for Standardization.","authors":"Janet A C Philp, Kat A Sanders","doi":"10.1002/ca.70053","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.70053","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of human donor bodies for anatomical examination in the United Kingdom is regulated by the Human Tissue Authority (England, Wales, and Northern Ireland) and His Majesty's Inspector of Anatomy for Scotland. This study aimed to assess the variability of information provided to body donors and the associated consent forms across UK anatomy institutions. A total of 24 consent forms and information booklets were collected from all body donation programs across the UK. Building on previous research, each document was assessed against a checklist covering general information about the donation process, purposes and locations of body use, consent requirements, disposition of remains, and accessibility. The analysis revealed significant heterogeneity in the information provided. The findings suggest a need for standardization of body donation information and consent forms to ensure they meet ethical requirements for informed consent and to improve accessibility and inclusivity. Recommendations include ensuring consistency between information provided and consent forms, requiring confirmation of reading the information, standardizing age limits and medical condition statements, providing clear information for next of kin, and ensuring ethical oversight by institutional committees. Further research is needed on donors' perspectives regarding specific aspects of the donation process. These recommendations are proposed to provide a more consistent approach to sharing information about body donation, ultimately suggesting the development of a single, collaboratively produced form and information pack to minimize customization (and thus omissions).</p>","PeriodicalId":50687,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Anatomy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145607192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Immacolata Belviso, Jacopo Junio Valerio Branca, Giulia Guarnieri, Annamaria Morelli, Alessandra Pacini, Daniele Della Posta, Domenico Ribatti, Ferdinando Paternostro
Fractal geometry describes complex, self-similar patterns that repeat across spatial scales and is increasingly recognized as relevant in anatomical research. Indeed, the fractal organization is consistently observed in respiratory, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, nervous, renal, hepatic, and dermatological systems. A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (1977 to March 2025) identifying peer-reviewed original articles, reviews, and conference proceedings addressing the fractal organization of human organs at macrostructural or microstructural levels, with structural–functional relationships and/or clinical applications. Studies were excluded if they lacked direct translational relevance to humans, were not peer-reviewed, or did not utilize explicit fractal methodology. Key findings highlight that bronchial tree fractal dimension (FD) correlates with airflow limitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, while in the vascular system, retinal metrics reflect systemic microvascular health. Moreover, the fractal modeling of hepatic and renal hemodynamic models supports system-level interpretation. In the nervous system, cortical gyrification and neuronal dendritic FD are associated with cognitive capacity and disease progression. Gastrointestinal mucosal FD decreases in inflammatory and neoplastic conditions. Advances in multiscale imaging (e.g., micro-CT, MRI) and computational methods enable both in vivo and ex vivo assessment, although methodological heterogeneity remains a limiting factor. Overall, fractal analysis provides a quantitative and reproducible descriptor of anatomical complexity with demonstrated associations to functional performance and disease severity. Standardization of methodology, development of normative datasets, and validation in large prospective cohorts are essential for routine clinical practice.
分形几何描述了在空间尺度上重复的复杂的、自相似的图案,并且越来越多地被认为与解剖学研究相关。事实上,分形组织在呼吸系统、心血管系统、胃肠系统、神经系统、肾脏系统、肝脏系统和皮肤系统中都可以观察到。在PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science(1977年至2025年3月)上进行了全面的文献检索,确定了同行评审的原创文章、评论和会议记录,这些文章涉及人体器官在宏观结构或微观结构水平上的分形组织,结构-功能关系和/或临床应用。如果研究与人类缺乏直接的翻译相关性,没有经过同行评审,或者没有使用明确的分形方法,则排除研究。关键发现强调支气管树分形维数(FD)与慢性阻塞性肺疾病的气流限制相关,而在血管系统中,视网膜指标反映全身微血管健康。此外,肝和肾血流动力学模型的分形建模支持系统级解释。在神经系统中,皮质回旋和神经元树突状FD与认知能力和疾病进展有关。胃肠道黏膜FD在炎症和肿瘤条件下降低。尽管方法学的异质性仍然是一个限制因素,但多尺度成像(如微ct、MRI)和计算方法的进步使体内和体外评估成为可能。总体而言,分形分析提供了一种定量的、可重复的解剖复杂性描述,并证明了与功能表现和疾病严重程度的关联。方法的标准化、规范数据集的开发和大型前瞻性队列的验证对常规临床实践至关重要。
{"title":"Fractal Anatomy of Human Organs: A Narrative Review of Structure, Function, and Clinical Perspectives","authors":"Immacolata Belviso, Jacopo Junio Valerio Branca, Giulia Guarnieri, Annamaria Morelli, Alessandra Pacini, Daniele Della Posta, Domenico Ribatti, Ferdinando Paternostro","doi":"10.1002/ca.70052","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ca.70052","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Fractal geometry describes complex, self-similar patterns that repeat across spatial scales and is increasingly recognized as relevant in anatomical research. Indeed, the fractal organization is consistently observed in respiratory, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, nervous, renal, hepatic, and dermatological systems. A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (1977 to March 2025) identifying peer-reviewed original articles, reviews, and conference proceedings addressing the fractal organization of human organs at macrostructural or microstructural levels, with structural–functional relationships and/or clinical applications. Studies were excluded if they lacked direct translational relevance to humans, were not peer-reviewed, or did not utilize explicit fractal methodology. Key findings highlight that bronchial tree fractal dimension (FD) correlates with airflow limitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, while in the vascular system, retinal metrics reflect systemic microvascular health. Moreover, the fractal modeling of hepatic and renal hemodynamic models supports system-level interpretation. In the nervous system, cortical gyrification and neuronal dendritic FD are associated with cognitive capacity and disease progression. Gastrointestinal mucosal FD decreases in inflammatory and neoplastic conditions. Advances in multiscale imaging (e.g., micro-CT, MRI) and computational methods enable both in vivo and ex vivo assessment, although methodological heterogeneity remains a limiting factor. Overall, fractal analysis provides a quantitative and reproducible descriptor of anatomical complexity with demonstrated associations to functional performance and disease severity. Standardization of methodology, development of normative datasets, and validation in large prospective cohorts are essential for routine clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50687,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Anatomy","volume":"39 2","pages":"273-280"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12914156/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145598146","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Paul E. Neumann, Heba Labib, Martin Lhuaire, Noel T. Boaz, Geoffroy P. J. C. Noel, Carlos Suárez-Quian, Chernet Tessema, Peter J. Ward, Anthony J. Weinhaus, Mahindra K. Anand, Alan J. Detton
Opinions on the meaning of the term fascia appear to have been diverging for the past quarter century. In 1998, the definition of fascia in the international standard anatomical nomenclature was narrowed by removing the term fascia superficialis. On the other hand, fascia researchers, who continue to widely accept the term superficial fascia, have progressively broadened their definition of fascia and proposed that fasciae constitute an anatomical system, the fascial system. Here we examine competing concepts from an anatomical perspective with the goal of finding a position that could lead to a consensus among anatomists, other biomedical scientists and health practitioners with an interest in fascia. We endorse a return to the traditional view that fasciae are fibrous membranes that compartmentalize and connect parts of the body, that they are primarily composed of sheets or sheaths of dense irregular connective tissue, and that they are not parts of well-defined organs. They are prominent components of the integument, musculature, lining of the body cavities, and extraperitoneal spaces. The proposal that fibrous membranous components of the skeleton and nervous system are also fasciae merits further study and discussion.
{"title":"Fascia, Eh. What Is It? What Is It Good for?","authors":"Paul E. Neumann, Heba Labib, Martin Lhuaire, Noel T. Boaz, Geoffroy P. J. C. Noel, Carlos Suárez-Quian, Chernet Tessema, Peter J. Ward, Anthony J. Weinhaus, Mahindra K. Anand, Alan J. Detton","doi":"10.1002/ca.70047","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ca.70047","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Opinions on the meaning of the term <i>fascia</i> appear to have been diverging for the past quarter century. In 1998, the definition of fascia in the international standard anatomical nomenclature was narrowed by removing the term <i>fascia superficialis</i>. On the other hand, fascia researchers, who continue to widely accept the term superficial fascia, have progressively broadened their definition of fascia and proposed that fasciae constitute an anatomical system, the fascial system. Here we examine competing concepts from an anatomical perspective with the goal of finding a position that could lead to a consensus among anatomists, other biomedical scientists and health practitioners with an interest in fascia. We endorse a return to the traditional view that fasciae are fibrous membranes that compartmentalize and connect parts of the body, that they are primarily composed of sheets or sheaths of dense irregular connective tissue, and that they are not parts of well-defined organs. They are prominent components of the integument, musculature, lining of the body cavities, and extraperitoneal spaces. The proposal that fibrous membranous components of the skeleton and nervous system are also fasciae merits further study and discussion.</p>","PeriodicalId":50687,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Anatomy","volume":"39 2","pages":"262-272"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ca.70047","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145589729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Elena Martínez-Sanz, Mª Carmen Barrio-Asensio, Estela Maldonado, María Angustias Palomar-Gallego, Javier Catón, Luis A Arráez-Aybar, Jorge A Murillo-González, José Ramón Mérida-Velasco
The scalene muscles represent a crucial muscle group in cervical anatomy, with significant clinical and functional implications. Despite their importance, studies on their embryonic and fetal development remain scarce. This study examined the morphogenesis of the scalene muscles bilaterally in 33 developing human specimens [66 sides from 12 embryos (Weeks 6-8) and 21 fetuses (Weeks 9-13)] using serial histological sections and conventional light microscopy. The scalene blastema appeared during Week 6 of development, comprising myoblasts, mesenchymal cells, and collagen fibers, and was surrounded by fibroblast-like cells and collagen fibers. The ventral rami of spinal nerves forming the brachial plexus, along with the subclavian artery, divided this blastema into two components: a medial portion (scalenus anterior muscle primordium), pierced by the phrenic nerve, and a lateral portion (scalenus medius muscle primordium), pierced by the dorsal scapular nerve and the branches forming the long thoracic nerve. The scalene triangle, through which these neurovascular elements pass, formed between the scalenus anterior and medius primordia. The scalenus minimus muscle was identified in 7 of 66 sides (10.6%). Our findings suggest that the scalene blastema originates from both hypaxial myotomes and sclerotomes of the cervical somites. The developmental relationship between the scalene blastema and adjacent neurovascular structures may help explain anatomical variations in this region with clinical significance. Furthermore, the insertion of the scalenus anterior muscle into the parietal pleura via the suprapleural membrane primordium provides new insight into its functional role in respiratory mechanics.
{"title":"Morphogenesis of Human Scalene Muscles Between Weeks 6 and 13 of Development: Anatomical Aspects and Clinical-Functional Relevance.","authors":"Elena Martínez-Sanz, Mª Carmen Barrio-Asensio, Estela Maldonado, María Angustias Palomar-Gallego, Javier Catón, Luis A Arráez-Aybar, Jorge A Murillo-González, José Ramón Mérida-Velasco","doi":"10.1002/ca.70046","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.70046","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The scalene muscles represent a crucial muscle group in cervical anatomy, with significant clinical and functional implications. Despite their importance, studies on their embryonic and fetal development remain scarce. This study examined the morphogenesis of the scalene muscles bilaterally in 33 developing human specimens [66 sides from 12 embryos (Weeks 6-8) and 21 fetuses (Weeks 9-13)] using serial histological sections and conventional light microscopy. The scalene blastema appeared during Week 6 of development, comprising myoblasts, mesenchymal cells, and collagen fibers, and was surrounded by fibroblast-like cells and collagen fibers. The ventral rami of spinal nerves forming the brachial plexus, along with the subclavian artery, divided this blastema into two components: a medial portion (scalenus anterior muscle primordium), pierced by the phrenic nerve, and a lateral portion (scalenus medius muscle primordium), pierced by the dorsal scapular nerve and the branches forming the long thoracic nerve. The scalene triangle, through which these neurovascular elements pass, formed between the scalenus anterior and medius primordia. The scalenus minimus muscle was identified in 7 of 66 sides (10.6%). Our findings suggest that the scalene blastema originates from both hypaxial myotomes and sclerotomes of the cervical somites. The developmental relationship between the scalene blastema and adjacent neurovascular structures may help explain anatomical variations in this region with clinical significance. Furthermore, the insertion of the scalenus anterior muscle into the parietal pleura via the suprapleural membrane primordium provides new insight into its functional role in respiratory mechanics.</p>","PeriodicalId":50687,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Anatomy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145483772","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hyun-Ju Ji, Kyu-Lim Lee, Joe Iwanaga, Koichi Watanabe, Hyoung-Moon Kim, Hee-Jin Kim
The buccomandibular space is a potential space located within the oral and maxillofacial regions. This morphological study aimed to provide a detailed anatomical description and ultrasonographic examination of the buccomandibular space and its adjacent structures, to discuss its clinical significance-particularly in relation to pathological conditions such as the spread of odontogenic infections, complications associated with antiaging injectables, and tumor invasion-and to offer valuable insights into the understanding and management of lower face treatment and rejuvenation. Anatomical dissection was performed on 28 facial halves, including 10 from five embalmed and 18 from nine fresh-frozen Korean adult cadavers. An ultrasonographic study was conducted on 12 facial halves of six healthy Korean adult participants. In addition, targeted intraoral polycaprolactone filler injection into the buccomandibular space was performed on two fresh-frozen hemifaces to simulate the expansion of the potential space, followed by ultrasonographic validation and intraoral dissection to confirm the filler-occupied area. The buccomandibular space was bounded by six anatomical boundaries. Ultrasonographic examination at three reference points in the lower third of the face identified adjacent muscular and vascular structures. This study presented various methods for clarifying the boundaries and adjacent structures of the buccomandibular space. The detailed anatomical insights gained in our study can enhance the understanding of the buccomandibular space, including its clinical relevance and anatomical relationships with adjacent structures. These findings may also improve the interpretation of ultrasonographic imaging for healthcare professionals and students in both clinical and educational settings.
{"title":"Anatomical Study With Clinical Significance of the Buccomandibular Space: A Complementary Ultrasonographic Study to Cadaveric Dissection.","authors":"Hyun-Ju Ji, Kyu-Lim Lee, Joe Iwanaga, Koichi Watanabe, Hyoung-Moon Kim, Hee-Jin Kim","doi":"10.1002/ca.70044","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.70044","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The buccomandibular space is a potential space located within the oral and maxillofacial regions. This morphological study aimed to provide a detailed anatomical description and ultrasonographic examination of the buccomandibular space and its adjacent structures, to discuss its clinical significance-particularly in relation to pathological conditions such as the spread of odontogenic infections, complications associated with antiaging injectables, and tumor invasion-and to offer valuable insights into the understanding and management of lower face treatment and rejuvenation. Anatomical dissection was performed on 28 facial halves, including 10 from five embalmed and 18 from nine fresh-frozen Korean adult cadavers. An ultrasonographic study was conducted on 12 facial halves of six healthy Korean adult participants. In addition, targeted intraoral polycaprolactone filler injection into the buccomandibular space was performed on two fresh-frozen hemifaces to simulate the expansion of the potential space, followed by ultrasonographic validation and intraoral dissection to confirm the filler-occupied area. The buccomandibular space was bounded by six anatomical boundaries. Ultrasonographic examination at three reference points in the lower third of the face identified adjacent muscular and vascular structures. This study presented various methods for clarifying the boundaries and adjacent structures of the buccomandibular space. The detailed anatomical insights gained in our study can enhance the understanding of the buccomandibular space, including its clinical relevance and anatomical relationships with adjacent structures. These findings may also improve the interpretation of ultrasonographic imaging for healthcare professionals and students in both clinical and educational settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":50687,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Anatomy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145483672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Before the Civil War, there was little scientific research and no federally funded scientific research in America. William Hammond, a US Army surgeon, organized a small group of young Philadelphia-based physicians and established the Philadelphia Biological Society while on sick leave in December 1857. It was a short-lived society that promoted self-funded biomedical research. Hammond, after his appointment as Surgeon-General during the Civil War, realized that by utilizing his new top-down authority and military funding, he could conduct scientific research and envisioned producing an all-inclusive Medical and Surgical History of the War of the Rebellion. On May 21, 1862, Hammond ordered Union Army doctors to diligently collect and forward to him "all specimens of morbid anatomy, surgical or medical, which may be regarded as valuable … in the study of military medicine or surgery." The Army Medical Museum was established on August 1, 1862, to receive these materials. In addition to the officers in charge, the Museum required a small technical staff with highly specialized skills. A German immigrant anatomy technician who had been working at the University of Pennsylvania, Frederick Schafhirt, was hired as a "bone cleaner" on July 24, 1862. Soon, his sons Adolph and Ernest were working with him. Of the little that has been written about these colorful individuals, much is historically incorrect. This paper documents their lives and work at the Museum. Frederick Schafhirt was almost certainly the first federally funded research employee, and the Army Medical Museum represents the beginning of federally funded research in America.
{"title":"Frederick Schafhirt, the Army Medical Museum, and the Origins of Federally Funded Scientific Research in America.","authors":"James R Wright","doi":"10.1002/ca.70042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.70042","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Before the Civil War, there was little scientific research and no federally funded scientific research in America. William Hammond, a US Army surgeon, organized a small group of young Philadelphia-based physicians and established the Philadelphia Biological Society while on sick leave in December 1857. It was a short-lived society that promoted self-funded biomedical research. Hammond, after his appointment as Surgeon-General during the Civil War, realized that by utilizing his new top-down authority and military funding, he could conduct scientific research and envisioned producing an all-inclusive Medical and Surgical History of the War of the Rebellion. On May 21, 1862, Hammond ordered Union Army doctors to diligently collect and forward to him \"all specimens of morbid anatomy, surgical or medical, which may be regarded as valuable … in the study of military medicine or surgery.\" The Army Medical Museum was established on August 1, 1862, to receive these materials. In addition to the officers in charge, the Museum required a small technical staff with highly specialized skills. A German immigrant anatomy technician who had been working at the University of Pennsylvania, Frederick Schafhirt, was hired as a \"bone cleaner\" on July 24, 1862. Soon, his sons Adolph and Ernest were working with him. Of the little that has been written about these colorful individuals, much is historically incorrect. This paper documents their lives and work at the Museum. Frederick Schafhirt was almost certainly the first federally funded research employee, and the Army Medical Museum represents the beginning of federally funded research in America.</p>","PeriodicalId":50687,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Anatomy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145349804","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Joe Iwanaga, Kathleen Bubb, Mathangi Rajaram-Gilkes, Geoffroy Noel, Arada Chaiyamoon, David Ezra, Ameed Raoof, Guenevere Rae, Estomih P. Mtui, Alan J. Detton, Mahindra Kumar Anand, Kazzara Raeburn, Mi-Sun Hur, Hee-Jin Kim, Laligam N. Sekhar, Yoko Tabira, Koichi Watanabe, Mohammed K. Khalil, Anthony D' Antoni, Marios Loukas, Robert J. Spinner, Philip J. Adds, R. Shane Tubbs
At the 42nd Annual Meeting of the American Association of Clinical Anatomists (AACA) in Bellevue, Washington, June 2025, two inaugural events—the Clinical Anatomy Fireside Chat (CAFC) and the Clinical Anatomy Symposium: Head and Neck 2025 (CAS)—fostered rich dialogue on the evolving role and operational definition of clinical anatomy. Experts from various clinical and anatomical disciplines explored the meaning of clinical anatomy, highlighting the absence of a universal definition despite its frequent use in education and research. Through these interdisciplinary discussions, a consensus emerged: clinical anatomy is not defined solely by the possession of clinical credentials but by the integration of anatomical knowledge and clinical relevance, achieved most effectively through collaboration. Clinical anatomy education and research require different depths of clinical knowledge depending on the audience and objective, and meaningful collaboration can bridge gaps in expertise. The symposium further illustrated that high-quality clinical anatomy emerges from mutual respect and reciprocal insight between clinicians and anatomists. This article presents a consensus statement developed by AACA representatives and invited speakers, affirming that collaboration is not only foundational to the practice of clinical anatomy but also fundamental to its definition. These conclusions aim to guide future educational models, research strategies, and interdisciplinary partnerships in the field of clinical anatomy.
{"title":"What Is Clinical Anatomy?—A Consensus Statement From the American Association of Clinical Anatomists","authors":"Joe Iwanaga, Kathleen Bubb, Mathangi Rajaram-Gilkes, Geoffroy Noel, Arada Chaiyamoon, David Ezra, Ameed Raoof, Guenevere Rae, Estomih P. Mtui, Alan J. Detton, Mahindra Kumar Anand, Kazzara Raeburn, Mi-Sun Hur, Hee-Jin Kim, Laligam N. Sekhar, Yoko Tabira, Koichi Watanabe, Mohammed K. Khalil, Anthony D' Antoni, Marios Loukas, Robert J. Spinner, Philip J. Adds, R. Shane Tubbs","doi":"10.1002/ca.70040","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ca.70040","url":null,"abstract":"<p>At the 42nd Annual Meeting of the American Association of Clinical Anatomists (AACA) in Bellevue, Washington, June 2025, two inaugural events—the Clinical Anatomy Fireside Chat (CAFC) and the Clinical Anatomy Symposium: Head and Neck 2025 (CAS)—fostered rich dialogue on the evolving role and operational definition of clinical anatomy. Experts from various clinical and anatomical disciplines explored the meaning of clinical anatomy, highlighting the absence of a universal definition despite its frequent use in education and research. Through these interdisciplinary discussions, a consensus emerged: clinical anatomy is not defined solely by the possession of clinical credentials but by the integration of anatomical knowledge and clinical relevance, achieved most effectively through collaboration. Clinical anatomy education and research require different depths of clinical knowledge depending on the audience and objective, and meaningful collaboration can bridge gaps in expertise. The symposium further illustrated that high-quality clinical anatomy emerges from mutual respect and reciprocal insight between clinicians and anatomists. This article presents a consensus statement developed by AACA representatives and invited speakers, affirming that collaboration is not only foundational to the practice of clinical anatomy but also fundamental to its definition. These conclusions aim to guide future educational models, research strategies, and interdisciplinary partnerships in the field of clinical anatomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50687,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Anatomy","volume":"39 1","pages":"72-76"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12747604/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145338055","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}