Pub Date : 2024-04-17DOI: 10.22454/primer.2024.609918
Tiffany Ho, B. Marzolf, Andrew D. Curtin, Ray Biggs
Introduction: CERA, the Council of Academic Family Medicine (CAFM) Educational Research Alliance, represents a unique collaboration between family medicine organizations, conducting annual surveys of distinct groups within family medicine. CERA’s mission is to support family medicine educational research. This paper presents the methods and demographic results of the 2023 General Membership Survey. Methods: CERA’s call for proposals for the annual General Membership Survey opened from June 2023 to July 2023. We received 16 proposals, and after a peer review process, five topics were accepted. Each author was assigned a research mentor. Because all the accepted proposals targeted physicians, the survey was distributed to select members of the CAFM organizations via SurveyMonkey from November 20, 2023 through December 22, 2023. We used χ2 and Fisher’s exact tests for analysis. Results: The final pool size was 3,598. Eight-hundred thirty-three members completed the survey, for a response rate of 23.2% (833/3,598). Demographic data of potential survey respondents were compared with data of actual respondents. There were no significant differences in gender, location and underrepresented in medicine status. Actual survey respondents were slightly older, less likely Asian, and more likely to have a doctor of medicine (MD) or combined doctorate degree compared to potential survey respondents. Conclusion: This paper describes the methods of the 2023 CERA General Membership Survey. The 2023 survey focused on active physicians. The demographics of the survey respondents differed slightly from potential respondents. Authors of the five accepted survey topics are responsible for publishing their study findings.
{"title":"Protocol for the 2023 CERA General Membership Survey","authors":"Tiffany Ho, B. Marzolf, Andrew D. Curtin, Ray Biggs","doi":"10.22454/primer.2024.609918","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22454/primer.2024.609918","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: CERA, the Council of Academic Family Medicine (CAFM) Educational Research Alliance, represents a unique collaboration between family medicine organizations, conducting annual surveys of distinct groups within family medicine. CERA’s mission is to support family medicine educational research. This paper presents the methods and demographic results of the 2023 General Membership Survey. Methods: CERA’s call for proposals for the annual General Membership Survey opened from June 2023 to July 2023. We received 16 proposals, and after a peer review process, five topics were accepted. Each author was assigned a research mentor. Because all the accepted proposals targeted physicians, the survey was distributed to select members of the CAFM organizations via SurveyMonkey from November 20, 2023 through December 22, 2023. We used χ2 and Fisher’s exact tests for analysis. Results: The final pool size was 3,598. Eight-hundred thirty-three members completed the survey, for a response rate of 23.2% (833/3,598). Demographic data of potential survey respondents were compared with data of actual respondents. There were no significant differences in gender, location and underrepresented in medicine status. Actual survey respondents were slightly older, less likely Asian, and more likely to have a doctor of medicine (MD) or combined doctorate degree compared to potential survey respondents. Conclusion: This paper describes the methods of the 2023 CERA General Membership Survey. The 2023 survey focused on active physicians. The demographics of the survey respondents differed slightly from potential respondents. Authors of the five accepted survey topics are responsible for publishing their study findings.","PeriodicalId":507541,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER","volume":" 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140690706","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-11DOI: 10.22454/primer.2024.834650
Kevin Robinson, J. Reilly
Introduction: Nutrition education remains inadequate in American medical schools, and physicians often cite lack of nutrition knowledge as a barrier to counseling patients. The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of additional nutrition curriculum on first-year medical students. Methods: We created a 1-hour nutrition lecture, delivered to first-year medical students. Using pre-, post-, and 3-month follow-up surveys, we assessed the following: (1) change in student knowledge; (2) confidence in counseling patients; (3) motivation to change their personal dietary behaviors; and (4) satisfaction with the curriculum. We assessed objectives using multiple choice questions and 10-point Likert scale questions. Results: Of the 142 students who attended the live lecture, 105 (73.9%) completed both pre- and postsurveys, and 65 (45.8%) completed the 3-month follow-up survey. Students’ knowledge of the material increased from 37% to 82%, but retention dropped to 65% at the 3-month mark (P<.001). Comfort in assessing and counseling patients improved across the three survey iterations, from 3.53 to 5.90 to 8.00 (P<.001). Motivation to change personal behaviors was high overall at 8.04, 8.36 and 8.25 [P<.05]). Moreover, students were satisfied with the lecture, with a rating of 8.58/10. Conclusions: This study supports the value of additional medical student nutrition education. This curriculum significantly increases student knowledge, comfort with the material, and confidence in counseling their future patients. A longitudinal curriculum that reinforces concepts over time will help improve long-term retention.
{"title":"Assessing the Impact of Nutrition Training Among Medical Students","authors":"Kevin Robinson, J. Reilly","doi":"10.22454/primer.2024.834650","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22454/primer.2024.834650","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Nutrition education remains inadequate in American medical schools, and physicians often cite lack of nutrition knowledge as a barrier to counseling patients. The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of additional nutrition curriculum on first-year medical students.\u0000Methods: We created a 1-hour nutrition lecture, delivered to first-year medical students. Using pre-, post-, and 3-month follow-up surveys, we assessed the following: (1) change in student knowledge; (2) confidence in counseling patients; (3) motivation to change their personal dietary behaviors; and (4) satisfaction with the curriculum. We assessed objectives using multiple choice questions and 10-point Likert scale questions.\u0000Results: Of the 142 students who attended the live lecture, 105 (73.9%) completed both pre- and postsurveys, and 65 (45.8%) completed the 3-month follow-up survey. Students’ knowledge of the material increased from 37% to 82%, but retention dropped to 65% at the 3-month mark (P<.001). Comfort in assessing and counseling patients improved across the three survey iterations, from 3.53 to 5.90 to 8.00 (P<.001). Motivation to change personal behaviors was high overall at 8.04, 8.36 and 8.25 [P<.05]). Moreover, students were satisfied with the lecture, with a rating of 8.58/10.\u0000Conclusions: This study supports the value of additional medical student nutrition education. This curriculum significantly increases student knowledge, comfort with the material, and confidence in counseling their future patients. A longitudinal curriculum that reinforces concepts over time will help improve long-term retention.","PeriodicalId":507541,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140714449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-22DOI: 10.22454/primer.2024.812665
Heather L. Paladine, Ray Biggs, Miranda A. Moore
Introduction: CERA, the Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance, is a program sponsored by the academic family medicine organizations with the goal of supporting and improving educational research in family medicine. CERA produces surveys of different groups in academic family medicine, including an annual survey of department chairs, and members can apply to add their question sets to these surveys. This article describes the methods and demographics of the 2023 CERA Department Chair Survey. Methods: The call for proposals for the CERA Department Chair Survey was open from April 3, 2023 through May 9, 2023. Fifteen proposals were received, and five were accepted for the final survey based on scoring by peer reviewers. The Institutional Review Board of the American Academy of Family Physicians approved the survey. The final survey, including question sets from five research teams and standard demographic questions, was sent to 227 department chairs in the United States and Canada. Results: Overall, 114 chairs responded to the survey, for a response rate of 50.2%. Demographic variables, including race/ethnicity, gender, age, and region of the country, did not differ between respondents and nonrespondents. Discussion: The CERA Department Chair Survey provides a framework for members of academic family medicine organizations to conduct survey research on topics that are important to the specialty. Advantages of the CERA process include a national sample and robust response rate. Disadvantages are primarily the limitation in number of survey questions and the fact that not all proposals are accepted.
{"title":"Protocol for the 2023 CERA Department Chair Survey","authors":"Heather L. Paladine, Ray Biggs, Miranda A. Moore","doi":"10.22454/primer.2024.812665","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22454/primer.2024.812665","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: CERA, the Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance, is a program sponsored by the academic family medicine organizations with the goal of supporting and improving educational research in family medicine. CERA produces surveys of different groups in academic family medicine, including an annual survey of department chairs, and members can apply to add their question sets to these surveys. This article describes the methods and demographics of the 2023 CERA Department Chair Survey.\u0000Methods: The call for proposals for the CERA Department Chair Survey was open from April 3, 2023 through May 9, 2023. Fifteen proposals were received, and five were accepted for the final survey based on scoring by peer reviewers. The Institutional Review Board of the American Academy of Family Physicians approved the survey. The final survey, including question sets from five research teams and standard demographic questions, was sent to 227 department chairs in the United States and Canada.\u0000Results: Overall, 114 chairs responded to the survey, for a response rate of 50.2%. Demographic variables, including race/ethnicity, gender, age, and region of the country, did not differ between respondents and nonrespondents.\u0000Discussion: The CERA Department Chair Survey provides a framework for members of academic family medicine organizations to conduct survey research on topics that are important to the specialty. Advantages of the CERA process include a national sample and robust response rate. Disadvantages are primarily the limitation in number of survey questions and the fact that not all proposals are accepted.","PeriodicalId":507541,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER","volume":" 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140218391","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-18DOI: 10.22454/primer.2024.879447
Kennedi Wilson, Rosemary Agwuncha, Jason Franco-Castano, Lauren Gilbert
{"title":"Assets in Primary Care: Community Health Workers Tackle Inequities in Texas","authors":"Kennedi Wilson, Rosemary Agwuncha, Jason Franco-Castano, Lauren Gilbert","doi":"10.22454/primer.2024.879447","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22454/primer.2024.879447","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":507541,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER","volume":"273 25‐28","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140233373","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-13DOI: 10.22454/primer.2024.300997
Michael T. Kopec, Tyler Barreto
Introduction: Procedure training in family medicine residency is important for future full-spectrum practice. Some residency programs have cited difficulty providing adequate procedure education. Residency collaboration with nonfaculty attending physicians working at community nonresidency clinics may help programs increase resident exposure to procedures. We assessed the feasibility of such an educational model by establishing recurring procedure clinics in a nonresidency family medicine site supervised by nonfaculty physicians. Methods: Twice monthly, half-day procedure clinics were conducted at a community site, where family medicine residents were supervised by nonfaculty community family physicians. After participation, we surveyed residents about their perceptions of the clinics. Using retrospective chart review, we determined quantity and type of procedures performed. Results: Fifteen residents participated in 21 procedure clinics, featuring 18 procedure types and 268 procedures. Skin lesion excision, nail removal, punch and shave procedures, joint injection, newborn circumcision, and implantable contraception management were most consistently performed. Residents rated clinics highly and were satisfied with procedure number and variety, opportunity to learn new procedures and techniques, and feedback received. Over 80% of residents noted experiences in procedures that were less commonly encountered in their residency. Conclusion: Procedure clinics at a nonresidency site hosted by nonfaculty attending physicians provided additional training in a variety of primary care procedures. The clinics were favorable to residents and may help programs address training gaps.
{"title":"Utilizing Community Procedure Clinics to Enhance Resident Procedural Education","authors":"Michael T. Kopec, Tyler Barreto","doi":"10.22454/primer.2024.300997","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22454/primer.2024.300997","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Procedure training in family medicine residency is important for future full-spectrum practice. Some residency programs have cited difficulty providing adequate procedure education. Residency collaboration with nonfaculty attending physicians working at community nonresidency clinics may help programs increase resident exposure to procedures. We assessed the feasibility of such an educational model by establishing recurring procedure clinics in a nonresidency family medicine site supervised by nonfaculty physicians.\u0000Methods: Twice monthly, half-day procedure clinics were conducted at a community site, where family medicine residents were supervised by nonfaculty community family physicians. After participation, we surveyed residents about their perceptions of the clinics. Using retrospective chart review, we determined quantity and type of procedures performed.\u0000Results: Fifteen residents participated in 21 procedure clinics, featuring 18 procedure types and 268 procedures. Skin lesion excision, nail removal, punch and shave procedures, joint injection, newborn circumcision, and implantable contraception management were most consistently performed. Residents rated clinics highly and were satisfied with procedure number and variety, opportunity to learn new procedures and techniques, and feedback received. Over 80% of residents noted experiences in procedures that were less commonly encountered in their residency.\u0000Conclusion: Procedure clinics at a nonresidency site hosted by nonfaculty attending physicians provided additional training in a variety of primary care procedures. The clinics were favorable to residents and may help programs address training gaps. ","PeriodicalId":507541,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER","volume":"1978 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140246810","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-01DOI: 10.22454/primer.2024.436038
Maria Aristova, Melissa Shaw, Emily Hendel, M. Tschoe
Introduction: The Education-Centered Medical Home (ECMH) is a longitudinal clerkship that emphasizes continuity and quality improvement in primary care. We aimed to evaluate our ECMH’s ability to improve type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) care through a systematic chart audit and care planning process. The effect of this intervention was measured by adherence to process and outcome measures.Methods: From November 2015 to March 2017, medical students were educated on and performed monthly chart audits of guideline-based quality metrics: hemoglobin A1c systolic blood pressure; lipid and microalbuminuria evaluation; annual ophthalmic and foot examinations; flu, hepatitis, and pneumonia vaccination; and statin therapy. Patients were included if they had a diagnosis of T2DM and were seen by the ECMH clinic before and after the audits started. Students shared audit logs, using them to plan patient appointments. We assessed changes in proportion of patients meeting each guideline with Fisher’s exact test. Results: The project included 11 patients with T2DM. ECMH adherence to the annual eye exam increased significantly 1 year postintervention, compared to preintervention (73% vs 55%; P=.03) and 6 months (73% vs 46%, P=.01). Conclusion: The metric with significant improvement during the chart audit, annual eye exam, is a process measure requiring advance planning. This small study suggests that a formal, regular audit process can improve student adherence to evidence-based care guidelines, particularly for tasks that require advance planning or action by the care team outside the day of a patient visit.
{"title":"Longitudinal Medical Student Collaborative Care in Primary Care Patients With Type 2 Diabetes","authors":"Maria Aristova, Melissa Shaw, Emily Hendel, M. Tschoe","doi":"10.22454/primer.2024.436038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22454/primer.2024.436038","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The Education-Centered Medical Home (ECMH) is a longitudinal clerkship that emphasizes continuity and quality improvement in primary care. We aimed to evaluate our ECMH’s ability to improve type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) care through a systematic chart audit and care planning process. The effect of this intervention was measured by adherence to process and outcome measures.Methods: From November 2015 to March 2017, medical students were educated on and performed monthly chart audits of guideline-based quality metrics: hemoglobin A1c systolic blood pressure; lipid and microalbuminuria evaluation; annual ophthalmic and foot examinations; flu, hepatitis, and pneumonia vaccination; and statin therapy. Patients were included if they had a diagnosis of T2DM and were seen by the ECMH clinic before and after the audits started. Students shared audit logs, using them to plan patient appointments. We assessed changes in proportion of patients meeting each guideline with Fisher’s exact test. Results: The project included 11 patients with T2DM. ECMH adherence to the annual eye exam increased significantly 1 year postintervention, compared to preintervention (73% vs 55%; P=.03) and 6 months (73% vs 46%, P=.01). Conclusion: The metric with significant improvement during the chart audit, annual eye exam, is a process measure requiring advance planning. This small study suggests that a formal, regular audit process can improve student adherence to evidence-based care guidelines, particularly for tasks that require advance planning or action by the care team outside the day of a patient visit.","PeriodicalId":507541,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER","volume":"109 44","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140089924","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-29DOI: 10.22454/primer.2024.837001
Gregory P. Conners
{"title":"Response to Dr Snellings: Learning From Other Combined Programs","authors":"Gregory P. Conners","doi":"10.22454/primer.2024.837001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22454/primer.2024.837001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":507541,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER","volume":"23 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140412443","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-29DOI: 10.22454/primer.2024.657509
John E. Snellings
{"title":"Family Medicine and Internal Medicine: Let Our Powers Combine!","authors":"John E. Snellings","doi":"10.22454/primer.2024.657509","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22454/primer.2024.657509","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":507541,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER","volume":"8 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140413439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-29DOI: 10.22454/primer.2024.602418
Jolene Kittle
{"title":"Response to: \"Family Medicine and Internal Medicine: Let Our Powers Combine!\"","authors":"Jolene Kittle","doi":"10.22454/primer.2024.602418","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22454/primer.2024.602418","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":507541,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER","volume":"6 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140410117","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-28DOI: 10.22454/primer.2024.293111
Rachel S. Wasson, William H. O'Brien, Kelsey M. Dietrich
Introduction: Medical students experience high levels of stress, burnout, depression, suicidal ideation, and compassion fatigue. Mindfulness interventions in this population have demonstrated improvement in psychological outcomes. However, it is unclear if these improvements are maintained. Evaluation of changes in lifestyle behaviors may provide insight into factors that sustain improvements. Specific aims of this study were to (1) assess feasibility and acceptability of an innovative, virtual program involving experiential learning, social support, and motivational interviewing; and (2) evaluate preliminary healthy lifestyle behaviors and psychological outcomes from preprogram to postprogram and 4-week follow-up. Methods: We used a mixed-methods approach to investigate feasibility, acceptability, and effects of the virtual program using validated measures and open-ended questions. Participants were 20 first- and second-year medical students at one Midwestern US medical college who participated between October 2020 and December 2020. Participants were enrolled in one of two groups for the 8-week program via Webex. Participants completed surveys at preprogram, postprogram, and 4-week follow-up. They also completed weekly home practice assessments. Results: Nineteen of 20 participants completed the program (95% retention rate). All participants attended six or more sessions. Repeated measures analysis of variance revealed that participants had significant improvements in healthy lifestyle behaviors, burnout, self-compassion, and stress across time. Results were supported by qualitative themes of increased social support, wellness skills, and overall positive experiences. Conclusion: Findings suggest that the virtual program was feasible and acceptable to medical students, and improved healthy lifestyle behaviors and psychological outcomes that were maintained or increased at 4-week follow-up.
{"title":"Virtual Wellness Workshop for Medical Students: Effects on Healthy Lifestyle Behavior","authors":"Rachel S. Wasson, William H. O'Brien, Kelsey M. Dietrich","doi":"10.22454/primer.2024.293111","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22454/primer.2024.293111","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Medical students experience high levels of stress, burnout, depression, suicidal ideation, and compassion fatigue. Mindfulness interventions in this population have demonstrated improvement in psychological outcomes. However, it is unclear if these improvements are maintained. Evaluation of changes in lifestyle behaviors may provide insight into factors that sustain improvements. Specific aims of this study were to (1) assess feasibility and acceptability of an innovative, virtual program involving experiential learning, social support, and motivational interviewing; and (2) evaluate preliminary healthy lifestyle behaviors and psychological outcomes from preprogram to postprogram and 4-week follow-up.\u0000Methods: We used a mixed-methods approach to investigate feasibility, acceptability, and effects of the virtual program using validated measures and open-ended questions. Participants were 20 first- and second-year medical students at one Midwestern US medical college who participated between October 2020 and December 2020. Participants were enrolled in one of two groups for the 8-week program via Webex. Participants completed surveys at preprogram, postprogram, and 4-week follow-up. They also completed weekly home practice assessments.\u0000Results: Nineteen of 20 participants completed the program (95% retention rate). All participants attended six or more sessions. Repeated measures analysis of variance revealed that participants had significant improvements in healthy lifestyle behaviors, burnout, self-compassion, and stress across time. Results were supported by qualitative themes of increased social support, wellness skills, and overall positive experiences.\u0000Conclusion: Findings suggest that the virtual program was feasible and acceptable to medical students, and improved healthy lifestyle behaviors and psychological outcomes that were maintained or increased at 4-week follow-up.","PeriodicalId":507541,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER","volume":"86 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140421628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：