Pub Date : 2023-12-14DOI: 10.31599/krtha.v17i3.3037
Ani Yumarni, Ani Nuraeni, Hidayat Rumatiga
Endowment management has special principles, namely the principles of sustainability and eternity. This principle of eternity can be manifested in the form of optimizing the performance of nazhir (endowment organiser) and the District Office of Religious Affairs (KUA) which functions as manager, supervisor and recorder of the orderly administration of endowment in Indonesia. Due to the wide and large distribution of endowment land throughout Indonesia, the government, in this case the Indonesian Ministry of Religion, appointed the role and function of KUA elements as executors and supervisors of endowment. The style and allocation of waqf in each sub-district is different. This article analyzes the role and authority of the KUA of Nanggung District, Bogor Regency in carrying out its functions. In particular, the allocation of endowment in Nanggung District is still limited to '3M' endowment, namely masjid-musala, madrasa, and burial ground. This research uses a empirical juridical approach which is descriptive analytical and explanatory. This research provides an overview and analysis of endowment organiser and supervision practices by nazhir and by the KUA institution by linking this implementation to applicable laws and regulations. The results of this research show that the role and function of the Nanggung District KUA has been implemented optimally. The role of guidance and supervision runs optimally as seen in the endowment land which is registered and monitored from the aspect of ownership, handover of the endowment to the aspect of the performance of the nazhir as the endowment organiser.
{"title":"Pengawasan Pengelolaan Tanah Wakaf Dalam Kewenangan KUA Kecamatan Nanggung Kabupaten Bogor dalam Pendekatan Konsep Kesejahteraan Sosial","authors":"Ani Yumarni, Ani Nuraeni, Hidayat Rumatiga","doi":"10.31599/krtha.v17i3.3037","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31599/krtha.v17i3.3037","url":null,"abstract":"Endowment management has special principles, namely the principles of sustainability and eternity. This principle of eternity can be manifested in the form of optimizing the performance of nazhir (endowment organiser) and the District Office of Religious Affairs (KUA) which functions as manager, supervisor and recorder of the orderly administration of endowment in Indonesia. Due to the wide and large distribution of endowment land throughout Indonesia, the government, in this case the Indonesian Ministry of Religion, appointed the role and function of KUA elements as executors and supervisors of endowment. The style and allocation of waqf in each sub-district is different. This article analyzes the role and authority of the KUA of Nanggung District, Bogor Regency in carrying out its functions. In particular, the allocation of endowment in Nanggung District is still limited to '3M' endowment, namely masjid-musala, madrasa, and burial ground. This research uses a empirical juridical approach which is descriptive analytical and explanatory. This research provides an overview and analysis of endowment organiser and supervision practices by nazhir and by the KUA institution by linking this implementation to applicable laws and regulations. The results of this research show that the role and function of the Nanggung District KUA has been implemented optimally. The role of guidance and supervision runs optimally as seen in the endowment land which is registered and monitored from the aspect of ownership, handover of the endowment to the aspect of the performance of the nazhir as the endowment organiser.","PeriodicalId":508279,"journal":{"name":"KRTHA BHAYANGKARA","volume":"50 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139179245","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-14DOI: 10.31599/krtha.v17i3.2905
Verdad Chabibullah Abdallah Iman, Maret Priyanta, Dicky Muslim
During the implementation of the Bedugul Geothermal Power Plant (PLTP) project, Bali received protests from the Balinese people which has caused the project to be neglected until now. In addition to the rejection from the Balinese people, the Government of Bali also refused to continue the Bedugul PLTP geothermal project, where the refusal was stated in the juridical provisions of the Governor of Bali's Rejection Letter Number 660.1/1497/Bid.1/Bapedalda dated 17 October 2005 addressed to the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Mineral Resources and Bali Governor Regulation No. 45 of 2019 concerning Bali Clean Energy which emphasizes that PLTP construction cannot be carried out in the Bedugul sacred area and indirectly this has hampered geothermal permits in the Bedugul working area. The approach method used in this legal research is a normative juridical approach, research that is based on existing legal principles and also looks at the facts that occur. The results of this research reveal that the case of rejection of the Bedugul PLTP project by the Bali Regional Government can be resolved through a lawsuit regarding unlawful act by government agencies and/or officials (onrechmatige overheidsdaad) with regard to the requirements for submitting administrative procedure at first as stated in Article 75 paragraph (1) of the Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration.
{"title":"Penyelesaian Sengketa Penolakan Proyek PLTP Bedugul Melalui Gugatan Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum Oleh Badan Dan/Atau Pejabat Pemerintahan (Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad)","authors":"Verdad Chabibullah Abdallah Iman, Maret Priyanta, Dicky Muslim","doi":"10.31599/krtha.v17i3.2905","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31599/krtha.v17i3.2905","url":null,"abstract":"During the implementation of the Bedugul Geothermal Power Plant (PLTP) project, Bali received protests from the Balinese people which has caused the project to be neglected until now. In addition to the rejection from the Balinese people, the Government of Bali also refused to continue the Bedugul PLTP geothermal project, where the refusal was stated in the juridical provisions of the Governor of Bali's Rejection Letter Number 660.1/1497/Bid.1/Bapedalda dated 17 October 2005 addressed to the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Mineral Resources and Bali Governor Regulation No. 45 of 2019 concerning Bali Clean Energy which emphasizes that PLTP construction cannot be carried out in the Bedugul sacred area and indirectly this has hampered geothermal permits in the Bedugul working area. The approach method used in this legal research is a normative juridical approach, research that is based on existing legal principles and also looks at the facts that occur. The results of this research reveal that the case of rejection of the Bedugul PLTP project by the Bali Regional Government can be resolved through a lawsuit regarding unlawful act by government agencies and/or officials (onrechmatige overheidsdaad) with regard to the requirements for submitting administrative procedure at first as stated in Article 75 paragraph (1) of the Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration.","PeriodicalId":508279,"journal":{"name":"KRTHA BHAYANGKARA","volume":"90 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139178950","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-14DOI: 10.31599/krtha.v17i3.2427
Tofik Yanuar Chandra, Joko Sriwidodo, M.S. Tumanggor
The progress of narcotics addictives is very concerning today and certainly requires comprehensive, integrated and continuous handling. However, in several cases, judges did not consider Article 103 of the Narcotics Law to provide rehabilitation for addicts and victims of narcotics abuse. Based on the background above, the problems that will be discussed in this study are: how is the implementation of the rehabilitation process for addicts and victims of narcotics abuse in Indonesia? And how does restorative justice apply to narcotics addicts through the rehabilitation process? This research is normative legal research with descriptive nature. The research results show that the implementation of rehabilitation for addicts and victims of narcotics abuse in Indonesia can be seen from the data for 2021 and 2022. It shows that the punishment for most narcotics addicts is imprisonment. So that efforts are needed from law enforcement officials prioritising rehabilitation for narcotics addicts to enforce restorative justice law. One of the efforts of restorative justice from law enforcement officials against narcotics addicts is the establishment of the Attorney General's Guidelines Number 18 of 2021 concerning the Settlement of Handling Cases of Crime of Narcotics Abuse through Rehabilitation with a Restorative Justice Approach as the Implementation of the Prosecutor's Dominus Litis Principle.
{"title":"Rehabilitation of Narcotic Addictives: An Overview of Implementation and The Effort by Restorative Justice","authors":"Tofik Yanuar Chandra, Joko Sriwidodo, M.S. Tumanggor","doi":"10.31599/krtha.v17i3.2427","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31599/krtha.v17i3.2427","url":null,"abstract":"The progress of narcotics addictives is very concerning today and certainly requires comprehensive, integrated and continuous handling. However, in several cases, judges did not consider Article 103 of the Narcotics Law to provide rehabilitation for addicts and victims of narcotics abuse. Based on the background above, the problems that will be discussed in this study are: how is the implementation of the rehabilitation process for addicts and victims of narcotics abuse in Indonesia? And how does restorative justice apply to narcotics addicts through the rehabilitation process? This research is normative legal research with descriptive nature. The research results show that the implementation of rehabilitation for addicts and victims of narcotics abuse in Indonesia can be seen from the data for 2021 and 2022. It shows that the punishment for most narcotics addicts is imprisonment. So that efforts are needed from law enforcement officials prioritising rehabilitation for narcotics addicts to enforce restorative justice law. One of the efforts of restorative justice from law enforcement officials against narcotics addicts is the establishment of the Attorney General's Guidelines Number 18 of 2021 concerning the Settlement of Handling Cases of Crime of Narcotics Abuse through Rehabilitation with a Restorative Justice Approach as the Implementation of the Prosecutor's Dominus Litis Principle.","PeriodicalId":508279,"journal":{"name":"KRTHA BHAYANGKARA","volume":"142 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139179853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-31DOI: 10.31599/krtha.v17i2.2358
Andrian
Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang memberikan alternatif hukum kepada kreditor maupun debitor untuk mengajukan permohonan kepailitan atau PKPU. Baik permohonan kepailitan maupun PKPU, debitor diberikan kesempatan untuk mengajukan proposal perdamaian kepada kreditor. Di dalam proses PKPU, ketika proposal perdamaian ditolak, maka debitor dinyatakan pailit. Konsekuensi yang terjadi ketika debitor dinyatakan pailit yang dimulai dari proses PKPU adalah debitor tidak memiliki upaya hukum yang dapat dilakukan, baik itu kasasi ataupu peninjauan kembali. Celah hukum tersebut menjadi permasalahan hukum yang seharusnya dapat diselesaikan dengan cara insolvency test sebagai kewenangan pengadilan untuk memeriksa kesehatan keuangan dan keberlangsungan usaha korporasi (going concern) untuk mencegah kesengajaan pemailitan oleh kreditor. Perihal konsep inosolvency test dan posibilitas penerapan gagasan ini perlu untuk dikaji lebih lanjut menurut hukum positif dan asas-asas kepailitan yang berlaku menurut UUKPKPU. Dalam melakukan kajian terhadap insolvency test tersebut, penulis akan menggunakan jenis penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan-pendekakatan analisis berupa pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Adapun hasil yang dicapai berdasarkan pembahasan ini berupa rekomendasi yuridis bagi legislator untuk merumuskan muatan insolvency test dalam UUKPKPU yang baru.
{"title":"Mekanisme Insolvency Test Dalam Mencegah Iktikad Buruk Pemailitan Korporasi Oleh Kreditor","authors":"Andrian","doi":"10.31599/krtha.v17i2.2358","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31599/krtha.v17i2.2358","url":null,"abstract":"Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang memberikan alternatif hukum kepada kreditor maupun debitor untuk mengajukan permohonan kepailitan atau PKPU. Baik permohonan kepailitan maupun PKPU, debitor diberikan kesempatan untuk mengajukan proposal perdamaian kepada kreditor. Di dalam proses PKPU, ketika proposal perdamaian ditolak, maka debitor dinyatakan pailit. Konsekuensi yang terjadi ketika debitor dinyatakan pailit yang dimulai dari proses PKPU adalah debitor tidak memiliki upaya hukum yang dapat dilakukan, baik itu kasasi ataupu peninjauan kembali. Celah hukum tersebut menjadi permasalahan hukum yang seharusnya dapat diselesaikan dengan cara insolvency test sebagai kewenangan pengadilan untuk memeriksa kesehatan keuangan dan keberlangsungan usaha korporasi (going concern) untuk mencegah kesengajaan pemailitan oleh kreditor. Perihal konsep inosolvency test dan posibilitas penerapan gagasan ini perlu untuk dikaji lebih lanjut menurut hukum positif dan asas-asas kepailitan yang berlaku menurut UUKPKPU. Dalam melakukan kajian terhadap insolvency test tersebut, penulis akan menggunakan jenis penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan-pendekakatan analisis berupa pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Adapun hasil yang dicapai berdasarkan pembahasan ini berupa rekomendasi yuridis bagi legislator untuk merumuskan muatan insolvency test dalam UUKPKPU yang baru.","PeriodicalId":508279,"journal":{"name":"KRTHA BHAYANGKARA","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139347548","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：