首页 > 最新文献

Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A最新文献

英文 中文
Optical Trocar Access for Retroperitoneal Robotic-Assisted Pyeloplasty in Children with Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction. 输尿管盆腔交界处梗阻儿童腹膜后机器人辅助肾盂成形术的光学套管入路。
Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2023.0444
H. Koga, Shunsuke Yamada, Masahiro Takeda, Takanori Ochi, Shogo Seo, Soichi Shibuya, Yuta Yazaki, N. Fujiwara, Rumi Arii, Geoffrey J. Lane, A. Yamataka
Purpose: Retroperitoneal robotic-assisted pyeloplasty (ret-RAP) for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) requires a larger retroperitoneal space (RS) to maintain specified distances between robotic (da Vinci) trocars and between trocars and the region of interest. A modified closed technique (MOT) and conventional closed technique (COT) were compared for creating an adequate RS with optical trocars. Methods: RS access in children with UPJO who underwent ret-RAP (n = 30) was MOT (n = 15) and COT (n = 15). All patients were positioned laterally. For MOT, a 5 mm optical trocar was inserted at the angle formed between the 12th rib and the erector spinae muscles. As the trocar was advanced under direct vision, it pierced the superficial subcutaneous layer, Scarpa's fascia, lumbar fascia, internal/external oblique and transversus abdominalis muscles, and the posterior renal fascia. Once in the RS, the tip of the scope was used for blunt dissection of perirenal fat, the tip was withdrawn until it was outside the perirenal fascia, and used to dissect toward the anterior abdomen in the pararenal fat layer. Results: Ages and weights at ret-RAP were similar (MOT: 5.6 ± 1.8 years versus COT: 7.8 ± 4.6 years; MOT: 20.6 ± 10.1 kg versus COT: 27.6 ± 13.9 kg). Times for RS access were similar (MOT: 1.6 ± 0.5 minutes versus COT: 1.9 ± 0.7 minutes), but RS expansion was significantly quicker in MOT (32.3 ± 8.7 minutes versus 52.0 ± 15.1 minutes; P < .001). Peritoneal injury caused carbon dioxide leakage in 4 of 15 COT cases and 0 of 15 MOT cases. Conclusion: RS expansion with MOT was safer because there were no peritoneal injuries and MOT was quicker than COT.
目的:腹膜后机器人辅助肾盂成形术(ret-RAP)治疗输尿管肾盂交界处梗阻(UPJO)需要较大的腹膜后空间(RS),以保持机器人(达芬奇)套管之间以及套管与相关区域之间的特定距离。比较了改良闭合技术(MOT)和传统闭合技术(COT)在使用光学套管创造足够的RS方面的效果。方法:对接受再RAP(n = 30)的UPJO患儿进行了MOT(n = 15)和COT(n = 15)两种RS入路术。所有患者均侧卧位。进行 MOT 时,在第 12 肋骨和竖脊肌之间形成的夹角处插入 5 毫米光学套管。在直视下推进套管时,套管会刺穿皮下浅层、斯卡帕筋膜、腰筋膜、腹内/外斜肌和腹横肌以及肾后筋膜。进入肾盂后,用瞄准镜的尖端钝性剥离肾周脂肪,然后将尖端撤回至肾周筋膜外,在肾旁脂肪层向前腹部剥离。结果再次RAP时的年龄和体重相似(MOT:5.6±1.8岁,COT:7.8±4.6岁;MOT:20.6±10.1千克,COT:27.6±13.9千克)。进入 RS 的时间相似(MOT:1.6 ± 0.5 分钟对 COT:1.9 ± 0.7 分钟),但 MOT 的 RS 扩张速度明显更快(32.3 ± 8.7 分钟对 52.0 ± 15.1 分钟;P < .001)。腹膜损伤导致二氧化碳泄漏的病例在 15 例 COT 中占 4 例,在 15 例 MOT 中占 0 例。结论:使用 MOT 进行 RS 扩容更安全,因为没有腹膜损伤,而且 MOT 比 COT 更快。
{"title":"Optical Trocar Access for Retroperitoneal Robotic-Assisted Pyeloplasty in Children with Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.","authors":"H. Koga, Shunsuke Yamada, Masahiro Takeda, Takanori Ochi, Shogo Seo, Soichi Shibuya, Yuta Yazaki, N. Fujiwara, Rumi Arii, Geoffrey J. Lane, A. Yamataka","doi":"10.1089/lap.2023.0444","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2023.0444","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Retroperitoneal robotic-assisted pyeloplasty (ret-RAP) for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) requires a larger retroperitoneal space (RS) to maintain specified distances between robotic (da Vinci) trocars and between trocars and the region of interest. A modified closed technique (MOT) and conventional closed technique (COT) were compared for creating an adequate RS with optical trocars. Methods: RS access in children with UPJO who underwent ret-RAP (n = 30) was MOT (n = 15) and COT (n = 15). All patients were positioned laterally. For MOT, a 5 mm optical trocar was inserted at the angle formed between the 12th rib and the erector spinae muscles. As the trocar was advanced under direct vision, it pierced the superficial subcutaneous layer, Scarpa's fascia, lumbar fascia, internal/external oblique and transversus abdominalis muscles, and the posterior renal fascia. Once in the RS, the tip of the scope was used for blunt dissection of perirenal fat, the tip was withdrawn until it was outside the perirenal fascia, and used to dissect toward the anterior abdomen in the pararenal fat layer. Results: Ages and weights at ret-RAP were similar (MOT: 5.6 ± 1.8 years versus COT: 7.8 ± 4.6 years; MOT: 20.6 ± 10.1 kg versus COT: 27.6 ± 13.9 kg). Times for RS access were similar (MOT: 1.6 ± 0.5 minutes versus COT: 1.9 ± 0.7 minutes), but RS expansion was significantly quicker in MOT (32.3 ± 8.7 minutes versus 52.0 ± 15.1 minutes; P < .001). Peritoneal injury caused carbon dioxide leakage in 4 of 15 COT cases and 0 of 15 MOT cases. Conclusion: RS expansion with MOT was safer because there were no peritoneal injuries and MOT was quicker than COT.","PeriodicalId":508448,"journal":{"name":"Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A","volume":"22 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140741318","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Long-Term Outcomes of Self-Expandable Metallic Stents as a Bridge to Surgery for Obstructive and Symptomatic Primary Tumors of Stage IV Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity-Score Analysis. 自膨胀金属支架作为 IV 期结直肠癌阻塞性和无症状原发肿瘤手术的桥梁的长期疗效:倾向分数分析
Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2024.0050
Akinori Sekioka, Shuichi Ota, Tetsuo Ito, Yo Mizukami, Kunihiko Tsuboi, Masahiko Okamura, Yoo Lee, Satoshi Ishida, Yugang Shim, Y. Adachi
Background: Self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) was introduced for the treatment of obstructive colorectal cancer (CRC) a few decades ago. However, its long-term outcomes remain controversial, especially for stage IV CRC. The aim of this study was to clarify the outcomes of SEMS as a "bridge to surgery" (BTS) for obstructive and symptomatic primary tumors in stage IV CRC by one-to-one propensity-score matching. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single center from January 2007 to December 2017. Patients with obstructive and symptomatic primary tumors of stage IV CRC underwent primary resection (PR) or placement of a SEMS as a BTS. They were divided into SEMS and PR groups, and their short- and long-term outcomes were compared. Results: In total, 52 patients were reviewed (SEMS group, 21; PR group, 31). Sixteen patients in both groups were matched using propensity scores. Patients in the SEMS group more frequently underwent laparoscopic surgery than those in the PR group (75% versus 19%, P = .004). The two groups showed no significant differences in perioperative and pathological outcomes. The 5-year overall survival was not significantly different between groups (29% versus 20%, P = .53). Conclusions: As a BTS, the use of SEMS for obstructive and symptomatic primary tumors in CRC stage IV can be a comparable option to PR in terms of short- and long-term outcomes, and would be less invasive with respect to surgical procedures.
背景:几十年前,自膨胀金属支架(SEMS)被引入用于治疗梗阻性结直肠癌(CRC)。然而,其长期疗效仍存在争议,尤其是对于 IV 期 CRC。本研究旨在通过一对一倾向分数匹配,明确 SEMS 作为 "手术桥梁"(BTS)治疗 IV 期 CRC 梗阻性和无症状原发肿瘤的疗效。材料与方法:这项回顾性队列研究于 2007 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月在一个中心进行。患有梗阻性和无症状原发肿瘤的 IV 期 CRC 患者接受了原发切除术(PR)或放置 SEMS 作为 BTS。他们被分为 SEMS 组和 PR 组,并比较了他们的短期和长期预后。结果共审查了 52 例患者(SEMS 组 21 例;PR 组 31 例)。两组中的 16 名患者通过倾向评分进行了配对。SEMS 组患者比 PR 组患者更常接受腹腔镜手术(75% 对 19%,P = .004)。两组患者的围手术期和病理结果无明显差异。两组的 5 年总生存率无明显差异(29% 对 20%,P = .53)。结论:作为一种BTS,使用SEMS治疗CRC IV期的梗阻性和无症状原发肿瘤在短期和长期疗效方面可与PR相媲美,而且手术创伤更小。
{"title":"Long-Term Outcomes of Self-Expandable Metallic Stents as a Bridge to Surgery for Obstructive and Symptomatic Primary Tumors of Stage IV Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity-Score Analysis.","authors":"Akinori Sekioka, Shuichi Ota, Tetsuo Ito, Yo Mizukami, Kunihiko Tsuboi, Masahiko Okamura, Yoo Lee, Satoshi Ishida, Yugang Shim, Y. Adachi","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0050","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0050","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) was introduced for the treatment of obstructive colorectal cancer (CRC) a few decades ago. However, its long-term outcomes remain controversial, especially for stage IV CRC. The aim of this study was to clarify the outcomes of SEMS as a \"bridge to surgery\" (BTS) for obstructive and symptomatic primary tumors in stage IV CRC by one-to-one propensity-score matching. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single center from January 2007 to December 2017. Patients with obstructive and symptomatic primary tumors of stage IV CRC underwent primary resection (PR) or placement of a SEMS as a BTS. They were divided into SEMS and PR groups, and their short- and long-term outcomes were compared. Results: In total, 52 patients were reviewed (SEMS group, 21; PR group, 31). Sixteen patients in both groups were matched using propensity scores. Patients in the SEMS group more frequently underwent laparoscopic surgery than those in the PR group (75% versus 19%, P = .004). The two groups showed no significant differences in perioperative and pathological outcomes. The 5-year overall survival was not significantly different between groups (29% versus 20%, P = .53). Conclusions: As a BTS, the use of SEMS for obstructive and symptomatic primary tumors in CRC stage IV can be a comparable option to PR in terms of short- and long-term outcomes, and would be less invasive with respect to surgical procedures.","PeriodicalId":508448,"journal":{"name":"Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A","volume":"19 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140744426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of Robotic Inferior Mesenteric Artery Ligation Level on Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in Rectum Cancer. 机器人肠系膜下动脉结扎水平对直肠癌低位前切除综合征的影响
Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2023.0472
Rıdvan Yavuz, O. Aras, Hüseyin Çiyiltepe, Tebessüm Çakır, C. Ö. Ensari, İsmail Gömceli
Background: Life expectancy of patients with rectal cancer is increasing day by day with innovative treatments. Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), which disrupts the comfort of life in these patients, has become a serious problem. We aimed to evaluate the effect of high ligation (HL) and low ligation (LL) techniques on LARS in rectal cancer surgery performed with the robotic method. Materials and Methods: The data of patients diagnosed with mid-distal rectal cancer between 2016 and 2021 who underwent robotic low anterior resection by the same team in the same center with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups as those who underwent HL and LL procedures. Preoperative, 8 weeks after neoadjuvant treatment, 3 and 12 months after ileostomy closure were evaluated. Results: A total of 84 patients (41 HL, 43 LL) were included in the study. There was no statistically significant difference between the demographic characteristics and pathology data of the patients. Although there was a decrease in LARS scores after neoadjuvant treatment, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups at 3 and 12 months after ileostomy closure (P: .001, P: .015). Conclusions: In patients who underwent robotic low anterior resection, there is a statistically significant difference in the LARS score in the first 1 year with the LL technique compared with that of the HL technique, and the LL technique has superiority in reducing the development of LARS between the two oncologically indistinguishable methods.
背景:随着治疗方法的创新,直肠癌患者的预期寿命与日俱增。低位前切除综合征(LARS)破坏了这些患者的生活舒适度,已成为一个严重的问题。我们旨在评估机器人直肠癌手术中高结扎(HL)和低结扎(LL)技术对 LARS 的影响。材料与方法:回顾性评估2016年至2021年期间确诊的中段直肠癌患者的数据,这些患者由同一中心的同一团队进行了机器人低位前切除术,并接受了新辅助化放疗。患者分为 HL 和 LL 两组。分别对术前、新辅助治疗后8周、回肠造口关闭后3个月和12个月进行评估。结果研究共纳入了 84 名患者(41 名 HL,43 名 LL)。患者的人口统计学特征和病理学数据差异无统计学意义。虽然新辅助治疗后 LARS 评分有所下降,但在回肠造口术关闭后 3 个月和 12 个月,两组患者的 LARS 评分差异有统计学意义(P:.001,P:.015)。结论在接受机器人低位前切除术的患者中,LL 技术与 HL 技术相比,在头 1 年的 LARS 评分差异有统计学意义,在两种肿瘤学上无差别的方法中,LL 技术在减少 LARS 的发生方面更具优势。
{"title":"Effect of Robotic Inferior Mesenteric Artery Ligation Level on Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in Rectum Cancer.","authors":"Rıdvan Yavuz, O. Aras, Hüseyin Çiyiltepe, Tebessüm Çakır, C. Ö. Ensari, İsmail Gömceli","doi":"10.1089/lap.2023.0472","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2023.0472","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Life expectancy of patients with rectal cancer is increasing day by day with innovative treatments. Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), which disrupts the comfort of life in these patients, has become a serious problem. We aimed to evaluate the effect of high ligation (HL) and low ligation (LL) techniques on LARS in rectal cancer surgery performed with the robotic method. Materials and Methods: The data of patients diagnosed with mid-distal rectal cancer between 2016 and 2021 who underwent robotic low anterior resection by the same team in the same center with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups as those who underwent HL and LL procedures. Preoperative, 8 weeks after neoadjuvant treatment, 3 and 12 months after ileostomy closure were evaluated. Results: A total of 84 patients (41 HL, 43 LL) were included in the study. There was no statistically significant difference between the demographic characteristics and pathology data of the patients. Although there was a decrease in LARS scores after neoadjuvant treatment, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups at 3 and 12 months after ileostomy closure (P: .001, P: .015). Conclusions: In patients who underwent robotic low anterior resection, there is a statistically significant difference in the LARS score in the first 1 year with the LL technique compared with that of the HL technique, and the LL technique has superiority in reducing the development of LARS between the two oncologically indistinguishable methods.","PeriodicalId":508448,"journal":{"name":"Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A","volume":"44 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140741919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
New Proposed Classification of Difficulty in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. 新提出的腹腔镜胆囊切除术难度分类。
Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2024.0045
A. Tongyoo, Aekkaphod Liwattanakun, Ekkapak Sriussadaporn, Palin Limpavitayaporn, Chatchai Mingmalairak
Background: Difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been challenging for surgeons. Randhawa's system used operative time, complications, and conversion to define three difficulty grades. However, using fixed numbers of operative time as dividers among three groups might not be applicable universally. This study aimed to propose new classification with more flexible parameters. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted with patients who underwent LC because of gallstone-related diseases between January 2017 and December 2021 at Thammasat University Hospital. The exclusion criteria were (1) emergent LC for acute cholecystitis, (2) other procedures performed in the same setting of LC, (3) incomplete information, and (4) LC converted to open cholecystectomy. Patients were categorized into three groups using Randhawa's classification. Thereafter, new classification using mean and standard deviation was applied to reclassify patients into three new groups. The comparison between two grading results was performed to prove the advantage of new classification. Results: Total of 523 patients who underwent LC were included with median age 59.3 years old and 60.8% female. By Randhawa classification, proportions of easy, difficult, and very difficult groups were 39%, 53.7%, and 7.3%, respectively. Then, the new operative-time dividers among three groups were changed from 60 and 120 minutes to mean and mean + 2SD, respectively. Reclassified three difficult groups were 38.9%, 57.1%, and 4%. The comparison demonstrated new classification as more flexible and more compatible with each individual surgeon. Conclusions: New surgeon-referenced grading system of difficult LC included surgeon's factors, not only unfavorable operative findings. This classification should be more flexible than the previous criterion-referenced one. Thai Clinical Trials Registry at https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org with Number TCTR20220426003.
背景:困难腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)一直是外科医生面临的挑战。Randhawa 的系统使用手术时间、并发症和转归来定义三个难度等级。然而,使用固定的手术时间作为三组之间的分界线可能并不普遍适用。本研究旨在提出具有更灵活参数的新分类方法。方法:这项回顾性队列研究的对象是 2017 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间在 Thammasat 大学医院因胆结石相关疾病而接受 LC 手术的患者。排除标准为:(1)急性胆囊炎急诊行胆囊切除术;(2)在胆囊切除术的相同情况下进行其他手术;(3)信息不完整;(4)胆囊切除术转为开腹胆囊切除术。采用 Randhawa 的分类方法将患者分为三组。之后,使用平均值和标准差进行新的分类,将患者重新分为三组。对两种分级结果进行比较,以证明新分类法的优势。结果共纳入 523 名接受肝癌治疗的患者,中位年龄为 59.3 岁,60.8% 为女性。根据 Randhawa 的分级,易手术组、难手术组和非常难手术组的比例分别为 39%、53.7% 和 7.3%。然后,三组之间新的手术时间分界线分别从 60 分钟和 120 分钟改为平均值和平均值 + 2SD。三个困难组的重新分类率分别为 38.9%、57.1% 和 4%。比较结果表明,新的分类更灵活,更符合每个外科医生的情况。结论:新的疑难 LC 外科医生参考分级系统包括了外科医生的因素,而不仅仅是不利的手术结果。与之前的标准参考分级系统相比,该分级系统更具灵活性。泰国临床试验注册中心 https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org,编号 TCTR20220426003。
{"title":"New Proposed Classification of Difficulty in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.","authors":"A. Tongyoo, Aekkaphod Liwattanakun, Ekkapak Sriussadaporn, Palin Limpavitayaporn, Chatchai Mingmalairak","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0045","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0045","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been challenging for surgeons. Randhawa's system used operative time, complications, and conversion to define three difficulty grades. However, using fixed numbers of operative time as dividers among three groups might not be applicable universally. This study aimed to propose new classification with more flexible parameters. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted with patients who underwent LC because of gallstone-related diseases between January 2017 and December 2021 at Thammasat University Hospital. The exclusion criteria were (1) emergent LC for acute cholecystitis, (2) other procedures performed in the same setting of LC, (3) incomplete information, and (4) LC converted to open cholecystectomy. Patients were categorized into three groups using Randhawa's classification. Thereafter, new classification using mean and standard deviation was applied to reclassify patients into three new groups. The comparison between two grading results was performed to prove the advantage of new classification. Results: Total of 523 patients who underwent LC were included with median age 59.3 years old and 60.8% female. By Randhawa classification, proportions of easy, difficult, and very difficult groups were 39%, 53.7%, and 7.3%, respectively. Then, the new operative-time dividers among three groups were changed from 60 and 120 minutes to mean and mean + 2SD, respectively. Reclassified three difficult groups were 38.9%, 57.1%, and 4%. The comparison demonstrated new classification as more flexible and more compatible with each individual surgeon. Conclusions: New surgeon-referenced grading system of difficult LC included surgeon's factors, not only unfavorable operative findings. This classification should be more flexible than the previous criterion-referenced one. Thai Clinical Trials Registry at https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org with Number TCTR20220426003.","PeriodicalId":508448,"journal":{"name":"Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A","volume":"75 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140741530","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Transareolar Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery in Females: A Novel Incision for Pulmonary Ground Glass Nodule Resection. 女性经乳晕视频辅助胸腔镜手术:肺磨玻璃结节切除术的新切口
Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2023.0435
Yanzhuo Liu, Ping Dong, Shaowen Zhang, Qing Geng, Z. Mao
Purpose: Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is recognized for its minimally invasive nature, widely adopted globally. However, the evident scarring it leaves often triggers psychological apprehension and resistance to surgery. Transareolar incision, known for its superior cosmetic outcome with no visible scars, poses challenges in women due to the risk of mammary gland damage. In this report, we present successful pulmonary ground glass nodule (GGN) resection using transareolar VATS in female patients, aiming to address these concerns. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 35 female patients who underwent GGN resection through transareolar VATS between August 2020 and March 2022. Results: There were no serious complications or perioperative deaths in this cohort of 35 female patients undergoing GGN resection through transareolar VATS. The operations, including local resection or segmentectomy, had an average duration of 70.1 ± 26.4 minutes, with a tube duration of 4.7 ± 2.1 days and a hospitalization time of 7.2 ± 2.3 days. The surgical approach varied, with 21 cases using transareolar uniport, 8 cases assisted by a 3-mm tiny port, and 6 cases converted to two-port VATS. Scar outcomes varied, with 21 cases showing no scar, 8 cases displaying a microscar, and 6 cases presenting a dominant scar of 1.7 ± 0.5 cm. Postoperative pain scores at 1 week and 1 month were 1.9 ± 0.9 and 1.0 ± 0.9, respectively, and the wound numbness occurred in 2.86% (1/35) of cases. Regarding breast complications, 2 patients suffered delayed healing of the incision. No damage and inflammation of glands were detected by breast B-mode ultrasonography. Conclusions: The transareolar incision emerges as a novel approach for VATS in female patients, offering advantages in terms of pain management and cosmetic outcomes.
目的:单孔视频辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)因其微创性而被全球广泛采用。然而,其留下的明显疤痕往往会引发心理上的担忧和对手术的抵触情绪。经乳晕切口因其无明显疤痕的优越美容效果而闻名,但由于有损伤乳腺的风险,这对女性来说是个挑战。在本报告中,我们介绍了在女性患者中使用经乳晕 VATS 成功切除肺磨玻璃结节(GGN)的情况,旨在解决这些问题。材料和方法:我们回顾性分析了在 2020 年 8 月至 2022 年 3 月期间接受经乳晕 VATS 肺磨玻璃结节切除术的 35 例女性患者的临床数据。结果在这35名通过经后叶VATS进行GGN切除术的女性患者中,没有出现严重并发症或围手术期死亡。手术包括局部切除或分段切除,平均持续时间为(70.1±26.4)分钟,插管时间为(4.7±2.1)天,住院时间为(7.2±2.3)天。手术方法各不相同,21 例使用经乳晕单端口,8 例使用 3 毫米微小端口辅助,6 例转换为双端口 VATS。疤痕结果各不相同,21 例无疤痕,8 例显示微疤痕,6 例显示 1.7 ± 0.5 厘米的主要疤痕。术后 1 周和 1 个月的疼痛评分分别为 1.9 ± 0.9 和 1.0 ± 0.9,2.86%(1/35)的病例出现伤口麻木。在乳房并发症方面,2 名患者的切口延迟愈合。乳腺 B 型超声波检查未发现腺体损伤和炎症。结论经乳晕切口是女性患者进行 VATS 的一种新方法,在疼痛控制和美容效果方面具有优势。
{"title":"Transareolar Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery in Females: A Novel Incision for Pulmonary Ground Glass Nodule Resection.","authors":"Yanzhuo Liu, Ping Dong, Shaowen Zhang, Qing Geng, Z. Mao","doi":"10.1089/lap.2023.0435","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2023.0435","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is recognized for its minimally invasive nature, widely adopted globally. However, the evident scarring it leaves often triggers psychological apprehension and resistance to surgery. Transareolar incision, known for its superior cosmetic outcome with no visible scars, poses challenges in women due to the risk of mammary gland damage. In this report, we present successful pulmonary ground glass nodule (GGN) resection using transareolar VATS in female patients, aiming to address these concerns. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 35 female patients who underwent GGN resection through transareolar VATS between August 2020 and March 2022. Results: There were no serious complications or perioperative deaths in this cohort of 35 female patients undergoing GGN resection through transareolar VATS. The operations, including local resection or segmentectomy, had an average duration of 70.1 ± 26.4 minutes, with a tube duration of 4.7 ± 2.1 days and a hospitalization time of 7.2 ± 2.3 days. The surgical approach varied, with 21 cases using transareolar uniport, 8 cases assisted by a 3-mm tiny port, and 6 cases converted to two-port VATS. Scar outcomes varied, with 21 cases showing no scar, 8 cases displaying a microscar, and 6 cases presenting a dominant scar of 1.7 ± 0.5 cm. Postoperative pain scores at 1 week and 1 month were 1.9 ± 0.9 and 1.0 ± 0.9, respectively, and the wound numbness occurred in 2.86% (1/35) of cases. Regarding breast complications, 2 patients suffered delayed healing of the incision. No damage and inflammation of glands were detected by breast B-mode ultrasonography. Conclusions: The transareolar incision emerges as a novel approach for VATS in female patients, offering advantages in terms of pain management and cosmetic outcomes.","PeriodicalId":508448,"journal":{"name":"Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A","volume":"11 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140744189","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease after Sleeve Gastrectomy: Effectiveness of Medical, Endoscopic, and Surgical Therapies. 袖状胃切除术后的胃食管反流病管理:药物、内窥镜和手术疗法的效果。
Pub Date : 2024-04-03 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2024.0111
Diana I Rapolti, Manuela Monrabal Lezama, Emiliano G Manueli Laos, F. Schlottmann, M. Masrur
Introduction: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has become the most frequently performed bariatric operation in the United States. One of the main disadvantages of this procedure is the risk of developing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after the operation. We aimed to analyze different approaches for the treatment of GERD after SG. Methods: A literature review was performed to identify all possible treatment options for post-SG GERD. All the studies were assessed for full eligibility by manual assessment of their aims, methodology, results, and conclusions. Records were individually reviewed by the authors comparing outcomes and complications between procedures. Results: Although some studies have shown improvement or even resolution of GERD symptoms after SG, most patients develop or worsen symptoms. Lifestyle modifications along with medical therapy should be started on patients with GERD after SG. For those who are refractory to medication, endoscopic and surgical therapies can be offered. Conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is consistently effective in treatment of GERD and is the ideal therapy in patients with associated insufficient weight loss. Endoscopic and alternative surgical procedures are also available and have shown acceptable short-term outcomes. Conclusions: Several treatment options exist for the treatment of GERD after SG. Although conversion to RYGB remains the most effective therapy, other emerging endoscopic and surgical procedures could avoid the potential morbidity of this procedure and should be further evaluated. An evidence-based algorithm for the management of GERD after SG is proposed to guide decision making.
导言:袖带胃切除术(SG)已成为美国最常见的减肥手术。这种手术的主要缺点之一是术后有可能患上胃食管反流病(GERD)。我们旨在分析治疗 SG 术后胃食管反流病的不同方法。方法:我们进行了文献综述,以确定治疗 SG 术后胃食管反流病的所有可能方案。对所有研究的目的、方法、结果和结论进行人工评估,以确定其是否完全合格。作者对记录进行了逐一审查,比较了不同治疗方法的疗效和并发症。结果:尽管有些研究显示胃食管反流手术后胃食管反流症状有所改善甚至消失,但大多数患者的症状还是会出现或加重。胃食管反流术后的胃食管反流病患者应在接受药物治疗的同时调整生活方式。对于药物治疗无效的患者,可以采用内窥镜和手术疗法。改用 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB)治疗胃食管反流病效果显著,是体重减轻不足患者的理想疗法。此外,还可采用内窥镜手术和其他外科手术,短期疗效也可接受。结论:治疗 SG 后胃食管反流病有多种治疗方案。虽然转为 RYGB 仍然是最有效的治疗方法,但其他新出现的内窥镜和外科手术可以避免这种手术的潜在发病率,因此应进一步评估。本文提出了一种基于证据的 SG 术后胃食管反流病治疗算法,以指导决策。
{"title":"Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease after Sleeve Gastrectomy: Effectiveness of Medical, Endoscopic, and Surgical Therapies.","authors":"Diana I Rapolti, Manuela Monrabal Lezama, Emiliano G Manueli Laos, F. Schlottmann, M. Masrur","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0111","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0111","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has become the most frequently performed bariatric operation in the United States. One of the main disadvantages of this procedure is the risk of developing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after the operation. We aimed to analyze different approaches for the treatment of GERD after SG. Methods: A literature review was performed to identify all possible treatment options for post-SG GERD. All the studies were assessed for full eligibility by manual assessment of their aims, methodology, results, and conclusions. Records were individually reviewed by the authors comparing outcomes and complications between procedures. Results: Although some studies have shown improvement or even resolution of GERD symptoms after SG, most patients develop or worsen symptoms. Lifestyle modifications along with medical therapy should be started on patients with GERD after SG. For those who are refractory to medication, endoscopic and surgical therapies can be offered. Conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is consistently effective in treatment of GERD and is the ideal therapy in patients with associated insufficient weight loss. Endoscopic and alternative surgical procedures are also available and have shown acceptable short-term outcomes. Conclusions: Several treatment options exist for the treatment of GERD after SG. Although conversion to RYGB remains the most effective therapy, other emerging endoscopic and surgical procedures could avoid the potential morbidity of this procedure and should be further evaluated. An evidence-based algorithm for the management of GERD after SG is proposed to guide decision making.","PeriodicalId":508448,"journal":{"name":"Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A","volume":"305 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140749889","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of Transumbilical Laparoscopy-Assisted Appendectomy with Conventional Three-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy Performed by Pediatric Surgeons in Training for Appendicitis in Children. 经脐腹腔镜辅助阑尾切除术与传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的比较,由接受过儿童阑尾炎培训的儿科外科医生实施。
Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2023.0275
Nanako Nishida, T. Kawano, Koshiro Sugita, Keisuke Yano, Chihiro Kedoin, Ayaka Nagano, Mayu Matsui, Masakazu Murakami, Tokuro Baba, Shun Onishi, Toshio Harumatsu, Koji Yamada, Waka Yamada, M. Torikai, S. Ieiri
Background: Transumbilical laparoscopy-assisted appendectomy (TULAA) is the technique of choice for all types of appendicitis. However, the technique is challenging for trainees to learn in comparison with performing conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (CTPLA) in children. We aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of children with appendicitis treated by TULAA versus CTPLA performed by pediatric surgeons in training (PSITs). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed pediatric patients with acute appendicitis treated with CTPLA or TULAA between April 2016 and December 2022. Operative time (OT: minutes), pneumoperitoneum time (PT: minutes), blood loss (milliliter), length of hospital stay (days), and surgical site infection rate were compared between the two groups. Operative outcomes were also analyzed according to type of appendicitis such as uncomplicated and complicated cases. Results: Two hundred twenty-five laparoscopic appendectomies were performed by CTPLA (n = 94) or TULAA (n = 131). All cases were performed by PSITs and there was no open conversion cases. TULAA had a shorter OT (67.0 ± 28.4 versus 78.3 ± 21.7; P < .01) and PT (26.1 ± 17.4 versus 52.5 ± 22.1 min; P < .01). The surgical site infection rate was slightly higher in the TULAA group, but the difference was not statistically significant. In uncomplicated appendicitis (n = 164), significant differences between the CTPLA and TULAA groups were observed in OT (CTPLA versus TULAA: 70.7 ± 14.9 versus 59.1 ± 21.6, P < .01) and PT (CTPLA versus TULAA: 43.6 ± 13.1 versus 20.4 ± 13.6, P < .01). With regard to postoperative complications, only surgical site infection was significantly different between the CTPLA and TULAA groups (CTPLA: 0.0% versus TULAA: 8.2%, P < .05). In complicated cases (n = 61), there were significant differences between the groups in PT (CTPLA versus TULAA: 73.4 ± 24.9 versus 42.3 ± 17.2, P < .01) and length of hospital stay (CTPLA versus TULAA: 7.0 ± 1.3 versus 8.9 ± 4.7, P < .05). Conclusions: TULAA had a shorter OT and PT than CTPLA. TULAA for PSITs shows similar safety and feasibility to CTPLA for not only uncomplicated cases but also complicated cases.
背景:经脐腹腔镜辅助阑尾切除术(TULAA)是治疗各种类型阑尾炎的首选技术。然而,与在儿童中实施传统的三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术(CTPLA)相比,该技术对受训者的学习具有挑战性。我们的目的是比较 TULAA 与由接受培训的儿科外科医生(PSITs)实施的 CTPLA 治疗儿童阑尾炎的手术效果。材料与方法:这项回顾性研究分析了2016年4月至2022年12月期间接受CTPLA或TULAA治疗的急性阑尾炎儿童患者。比较了两组患者的手术时间(OT:分钟)、腹腔积气时间(PT:分钟)、失血量(毫升)、住院时间(天)和手术部位感染率。此外,还根据阑尾炎的类型(如无并发症和复杂病例)对手术结果进行了分析。结果225 例腹腔镜阑尾切除术由 CTPLA(94 例)或 TULAA(131 例)完成。所有病例均由 PSITs 完成,没有开腹转化病例。TULAA的OT(67.0 ± 28.4对78.3 ± 21.7;P < .01)和PT(26.1 ± 17.4对52.5 ± 22.1分钟;P < .01)更短。TULAA组的手术部位感染率略高,但差异无统计学意义。在无并发症阑尾炎(n = 164)中,CTPLA 组和 TULAA 组在 OT(CTPLA 对 TULAA:70.7 ± 14.9 对 59.1 ± 21.6,P < .01)和 PT(CTPLA 对 TULAA:43.6 ± 13.1 对 20.4 ± 13.6,P < .01)方面存在显著差异。在术后并发症方面,只有手术部位感染在 CTPLA 组和 TULAA 组之间存在显著差异(CTPLA:0.0% 对 TULAA:8.2%,P < .05)。在复杂病例(n = 61)中,两组的 PT(CTPLA 对 TULAA:73.4 ± 24.9 对 42.3 ± 17.2,P < .01)和住院时间(CTPLA 对 TULAA:7.0 ± 1.3 对 8.9 ± 4.7,P < .05)有显著差异。结论:与CTPLA相比,TULAA的OT和PT时间更短。TULAA 用于 PSITs 的安全性和可行性与 CTPLA 相似,不仅适用于不复杂的病例,也适用于复杂的病例。
{"title":"Comparison of Transumbilical Laparoscopy-Assisted Appendectomy with Conventional Three-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy Performed by Pediatric Surgeons in Training for Appendicitis in Children.","authors":"Nanako Nishida, T. Kawano, Koshiro Sugita, Keisuke Yano, Chihiro Kedoin, Ayaka Nagano, Mayu Matsui, Masakazu Murakami, Tokuro Baba, Shun Onishi, Toshio Harumatsu, Koji Yamada, Waka Yamada, M. Torikai, S. Ieiri","doi":"10.1089/lap.2023.0275","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2023.0275","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Transumbilical laparoscopy-assisted appendectomy (TULAA) is the technique of choice for all types of appendicitis. However, the technique is challenging for trainees to learn in comparison with performing conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (CTPLA) in children. We aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of children with appendicitis treated by TULAA versus CTPLA performed by pediatric surgeons in training (PSITs). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed pediatric patients with acute appendicitis treated with CTPLA or TULAA between April 2016 and December 2022. Operative time (OT: minutes), pneumoperitoneum time (PT: minutes), blood loss (milliliter), length of hospital stay (days), and surgical site infection rate were compared between the two groups. Operative outcomes were also analyzed according to type of appendicitis such as uncomplicated and complicated cases. Results: Two hundred twenty-five laparoscopic appendectomies were performed by CTPLA (n = 94) or TULAA (n = 131). All cases were performed by PSITs and there was no open conversion cases. TULAA had a shorter OT (67.0 ± 28.4 versus 78.3 ± 21.7; P < .01) and PT (26.1 ± 17.4 versus 52.5 ± 22.1 min; P < .01). The surgical site infection rate was slightly higher in the TULAA group, but the difference was not statistically significant. In uncomplicated appendicitis (n = 164), significant differences between the CTPLA and TULAA groups were observed in OT (CTPLA versus TULAA: 70.7 ± 14.9 versus 59.1 ± 21.6, P < .01) and PT (CTPLA versus TULAA: 43.6 ± 13.1 versus 20.4 ± 13.6, P < .01). With regard to postoperative complications, only surgical site infection was significantly different between the CTPLA and TULAA groups (CTPLA: 0.0% versus TULAA: 8.2%, P < .05). In complicated cases (n = 61), there were significant differences between the groups in PT (CTPLA versus TULAA: 73.4 ± 24.9 versus 42.3 ± 17.2, P < .01) and length of hospital stay (CTPLA versus TULAA: 7.0 ± 1.3 versus 8.9 ± 4.7, P < .05). Conclusions: TULAA had a shorter OT and PT than CTPLA. TULAA for PSITs shows similar safety and feasibility to CTPLA for not only uncomplicated cases but also complicated cases.","PeriodicalId":508448,"journal":{"name":"Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A","volume":"737 ","pages":"380-385"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140776830","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prognostic Value of Postoperative Complication for Gastric Cancer. 胃癌术后并发症的预后价值
Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2023.0456
Lin-Fei Ren, Yong-Hong Xu, Jie-Gen Long
Background: The incidence of complications in gastric cancer (GC) patients after surgery was increasing, and it was not clear whether postoperative complications would have an impact on prognosis. The current study attempted to investigate the role of postoperative complication for prognosis on GC patients undergoing radical resection. Materials and Methods: Eligible studies were searched in three databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, in accordance with the searching strategy on September 4th, 2022. The survival values were most concerned; then, hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled up. All prognostic values, including overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS), were allowed. Subgroup analysis based on complication types was used for further in-depth research. Results: A total of 29 studies involving 33,858 patients were included in this study. Intra-abdominal abscess (19.4%) was the most common complications in the included studies, followed by anastomotic leakage (17.0%) and pneumonia (16.4%). There were 23, 4, 6, and 10 studies that reported OS, DFS, DSS, and RFS, respectively. After analysis, postoperative complication was found to be an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 1.52, I2 = 1.14%, 95% CI = 1.42-1.61, P = .00), DFS (HR = 1.71, I2 = 0.00%,95% CI = 1.44-1.98, P < .05), DSS (HR = 1.60, I2 = 54.58%, 95% CI = 1.26-1.93, P < .1), and RFS (HR = 1.26, I2 = 0.00%, 95% CI = 1.11-1.41, P < .05). Subgroup analysis found that noninfectious complication was not significantly associated with OS (HR = 1.39, I2 = 0.00%, 95% CI = 0.96-1.82, P > .05). Conclusion: Surgeons needed to pay more attention to GC patients who developed postoperative complications, especially infectious complications, and take proactive management to improve the prognosis.
背景:胃癌(GC)患者术后并发症的发生率越来越高,而术后并发症是否会对预后产生影响尚不清楚。本研究试图探讨术后并发症对胃癌根治性切除术患者预后的影响。材料与方法:按照检索策略,于 2022 年 9 月 4 日在 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 等三个数据库中检索了符合条件的研究。最关注的是生存值,然后汇总危险比(HRs)和95%置信区间(CIs)。所有预后值,包括总生存期(OS)、无病生存期(DFS)、疾病特异性生存期(DSS)和无复发生存期(RFS),均可纳入。根据并发症类型进行分组分析,以便进一步深入研究。研究结果本研究共纳入 29 项研究,涉及 33858 名患者。腹腔内脓肿(19.4%)是纳入研究中最常见的并发症,其次是吻合口漏(17.0%)和肺炎(16.4%)。分别有 23、4、6 和 10 项研究报告了 OS、DFS、DSS 和 RFS。经过分析发现,术后并发症是 OS(HR = 1.52,I2 = 1.14%,95% CI = 1.42-1.61,P = .00)、DFS(HR = 1.71,I2 = 0.00%,95% CI = 1.44-1.98,P .05)的独立预后因素。结论外科医生需要更加关注出现术后并发症,尤其是感染性并发症的 GC 患者,并采取积极的治疗措施以改善预后。
{"title":"Prognostic Value of Postoperative Complication for Gastric Cancer.","authors":"Lin-Fei Ren, Yong-Hong Xu, Jie-Gen Long","doi":"10.1089/lap.2023.0456","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2023.0456","url":null,"abstract":"Background: The incidence of complications in gastric cancer (GC) patients after surgery was increasing, and it was not clear whether postoperative complications would have an impact on prognosis. The current study attempted to investigate the role of postoperative complication for prognosis on GC patients undergoing radical resection. Materials and Methods: Eligible studies were searched in three databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, in accordance with the searching strategy on September 4th, 2022. The survival values were most concerned; then, hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled up. All prognostic values, including overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS), were allowed. Subgroup analysis based on complication types was used for further in-depth research. Results: A total of 29 studies involving 33,858 patients were included in this study. Intra-abdominal abscess (19.4%) was the most common complications in the included studies, followed by anastomotic leakage (17.0%) and pneumonia (16.4%). There were 23, 4, 6, and 10 studies that reported OS, DFS, DSS, and RFS, respectively. After analysis, postoperative complication was found to be an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 1.52, I2 = 1.14%, 95% CI = 1.42-1.61, P = .00), DFS (HR = 1.71, I2 = 0.00%,95% CI = 1.44-1.98, P < .05), DSS (HR = 1.60, I2 = 54.58%, 95% CI = 1.26-1.93, P < .1), and RFS (HR = 1.26, I2 = 0.00%, 95% CI = 1.11-1.41, P < .05). Subgroup analysis found that noninfectious complication was not significantly associated with OS (HR = 1.39, I2 = 0.00%, 95% CI = 0.96-1.82, P > .05). Conclusion: Surgeons needed to pay more attention to GC patients who developed postoperative complications, especially infectious complications, and take proactive management to improve the prognosis.","PeriodicalId":508448,"journal":{"name":"Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A","volume":"74 ","pages":"339-353"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140770892","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Surgeon-Performed Percutaneous Endoscopic Biliary Lithectomy: Description of a Novel Technique and Initial Results. 外科医生实施经皮内镜胆管切开术:一种新技术的描述和初步结果。
Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2023.0463
C. DeLong, E. Pauli, J. Winder
Introduction: Percutaneous endoscopic biliary lithectomy (PEBL) can be performed through preexisting drain tracts, offering ductal clearance and definitive management for patients with complicated gallstone disease unable to undergo conventional therapy. The technique has not been widely adopted by general surgeons. Herein, we describe our technique with surgeon-performed PEBL and present initial results. Materials and Methods: A single institutional retrospective review of the electronic medical record was performed for patients who underwent percutaneous choledochoscopy between February 2019 and November 2020. All operations were performed by 1 of 2 board-certified general surgeons with fellowship training in surgical endoscopy. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative variables were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: Thirteen patients underwent PEBL. Seventeen total procedures were performed; 4 patients underwent repeat intervention. The diagnoses leading to PEBL were: cholelithiasis (8), choledocholithiasis (4), and recurrent pancreatitis (1). Complete ductal clearance was achieved in 9 patients (69.2%) during the initial procedure. The remaining 4 patients (30.8%) underwent repeat PEBL, at which point complete ductal clearance was then achieved. The percutaneous drain was removed at the time of final procedure in 5 patients (38.5%) or within 5 weeks in the remaining 8 (61.5%). No intraoperative complications occurred, and no pancreatic or biliary postoperative complications or recurrences were noted with a mean follow-up of 279 ± 240 days. Conclusion: Surgeon-performed PEBL is a safe and effective method of achieving biliary ductal clearance. The technique is readily achieved following basic endoscopic and fluoroscopic principles and should be understood by all physicians managing gallstone disease.
导言:经皮内镜胆道切开术(PEBL)可通过原有的引流管进行,为无法接受常规治疗的复杂胆石症患者提供胆管清理和最终治疗。该技术尚未被普通外科医生广泛采用。在此,我们介绍了由外科医生实施的 PEBL 技术,并展示了初步结果。材料和方法:我们对 2019 年 2 月至 2020 年 11 月期间接受经皮胆道镜检查的患者的电子病历进行了单一机构回顾性审查。所有手术均由 2 名接受过外科内镜研究培训的获得医学会认证的普外科医生中的 1 名实施。采用描述性统计对术前、手术和术后变量进行了分析。结果:13名患者接受了PEBL手术。共进行了 17 次手术;4 名患者接受了重复干预。导致 PEBL 的诊断为:胆石症(8 例)、胆总管结石(4 例)和复发性胰腺炎(1 例)。9 名患者(69.2%)在初次手术中实现了完全的导管清除。其余 4 名患者(30.8%)接受了重复 PEBL,并在此时实现了完全的导管清除。5名患者(38.5%)在最终手术时移除了经皮引流管,其余8名患者(61.5%)在5周内移除了经皮引流管。术中未出现并发症,平均随访 279 ± 240 天,未发现胰腺或胆道术后并发症或复发。结论:外科医生实施的 PEBL 是一种安全有效的胆管清理方法。该技术遵循基本的内镜和透视原理,很容易实现,所有治疗胆石症的医生都应该了解。
{"title":"Surgeon-Performed Percutaneous Endoscopic Biliary Lithectomy: Description of a Novel Technique and Initial Results.","authors":"C. DeLong, E. Pauli, J. Winder","doi":"10.1089/lap.2023.0463","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2023.0463","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Percutaneous endoscopic biliary lithectomy (PEBL) can be performed through preexisting drain tracts, offering ductal clearance and definitive management for patients with complicated gallstone disease unable to undergo conventional therapy. The technique has not been widely adopted by general surgeons. Herein, we describe our technique with surgeon-performed PEBL and present initial results. Materials and Methods: A single institutional retrospective review of the electronic medical record was performed for patients who underwent percutaneous choledochoscopy between February 2019 and November 2020. All operations were performed by 1 of 2 board-certified general surgeons with fellowship training in surgical endoscopy. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative variables were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: Thirteen patients underwent PEBL. Seventeen total procedures were performed; 4 patients underwent repeat intervention. The diagnoses leading to PEBL were: cholelithiasis (8), choledocholithiasis (4), and recurrent pancreatitis (1). Complete ductal clearance was achieved in 9 patients (69.2%) during the initial procedure. The remaining 4 patients (30.8%) underwent repeat PEBL, at which point complete ductal clearance was then achieved. The percutaneous drain was removed at the time of final procedure in 5 patients (38.5%) or within 5 weeks in the remaining 8 (61.5%). No intraoperative complications occurred, and no pancreatic or biliary postoperative complications or recurrences were noted with a mean follow-up of 279 ± 240 days. Conclusion: Surgeon-performed PEBL is a safe and effective method of achieving biliary ductal clearance. The technique is readily achieved following basic endoscopic and fluoroscopic principles and should be understood by all physicians managing gallstone disease.","PeriodicalId":508448,"journal":{"name":"Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A","volume":"27 8","pages":"305-312"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140765946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Acknowledgment of Reviewers 2023. 鸣谢 2023 年审稿人。
Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI: 10.1089/thy.2023.29166.ack
{"title":"Acknowledgment of Reviewers 2023.","authors":"","doi":"10.1089/thy.2023.29166.ack","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2023.29166.ack","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":508448,"journal":{"name":"Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A","volume":" 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139196075","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1