Advances in Physiology Education最新文献

Rates of obesity continue to rise in the United States and across the globe. Obesity is a risk factor for developing insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. For clinicians, other health care providers, and educators, providing patients with accurate and meaningful information about obesity, including lifestyle (diet and exercise) interventions and symptom monitoring, is challenging because of infrequent contact, methods of communication, a lack of effective patient education resources, and inefficient patient feedback methods. Evidence suggests that significantly more patients are now getting their health care information online from general medical websites, disease-specific network communities, and social media. Thus, harnessing the power of technologies, including personal computers and smartphones, with attention to social media may equip health care providers with methods to serve their patients better by addressing challenges, improving indirect patient contact, and enhancing health outcomes. This article aims to provide an overview of technology with a focus on social media use in obesity education and outreach. Practical information is provided related to creating content, delivering content, and managing the social media space for the novice creator.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Rates of obesity continue to increase. Health care providers have a limited time to cover the nuances of obesity. Technology and social media are tools that can help health care workers provide obesity education to a large audience. This article provides the foundations for obesity education content generation and delivery for the novice creator.

Diving into the realm of game-based learning, the "CARBGAME"(CARd & Board GAmes in Medical Education) is an innovative series of games that reimagines the way medical students learn complex but essential chapters. In the pilot study, there was a highly significant improvement in the academic performance of students in the chapter "Vitamins." All the students perceived CARBGAME to be highly rewarding in terms of creating engaging and meaningful learning experiences. Recognizing the benefit of games in medical education, we strongly recommend the implementation of CARBGAME for essential topics in physiology education to create a more dynamic and engaging learning environment for students.NEW & NOTEWORTHY "CARBGAME" (CARd & Board GAmes in Medical Education) creates a unique and fun-filled educational environment where students learn complex but essential medical chapters in a gamified manner using cards and boards. This customizable innovation is strengthened with fundamental educational principles to promote engaging and meaningful learning experiences for students.

The changing landscape of academia can be difficult to navigate for anyone at any point throughout their career. One thing is certainly clear: effective mentorship is key to ensuring success, fueling scientific curiosity, and creating a sense of community. This article is a collection of personal reflections and stories, offering advice directed to aspiring and junior graduate trainees; it is written by Ph.D. students, postdoctoral researchers, early-stage assistant professors, and life-long educators. The objective of this article is to inform, empower, and inspire the next generation of physiologists.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This article is a collection of personal reflections and stories, offering advice directed to aspiring and junior graduate trainees that is written by Ph.D. students, postdoctoral researchers, early-stage assistant professors, and life-long educators. The objective of this article is to inform, empower, and inspire the next generation of physiologists.

Clinical practice has benefited from new methodologies such as realistic simulation (RS). RS involves recreating lifelike scenarios to more accurately reflect real clinical practice, enhancing learners' skills and decision-making within controlled environments, and experiencing remarkable growth in medical education. However, RS requires substantial financial investments and infrastructure. Hence, it is essential to determine the effectiveness of RS in the development of skills among medical students, which will improve the allocation of resources while optimizing learning. This cross-sectional study was carried out in the simulation laboratory of a medical school, and the performance of students who underwent two different curriculum matrices (without RS and with RS, from 2021 to 2022) in the Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) course was compared. This test was chosen considering that the competencies involved in cardiac life support are essential, regardless of the medical specialty, and that ACLS is a set of life-saving protocols used worldwide. We observed that the impact of RS can be different for practical abilities when compared with the theoretical ones. There was no correlation between the general academic performance and students' grades reflecting the RS impact. We conclude that RS leads to less remediation and increased competence in practical skills. RS is an important learning strategy that allows repeating, reviewing, and discussing clinical practices without exposing the patient to risks.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Realistic simulation (RS) positively affected the performance of the students differently; it had more influence on practical abilities than theoretical knowledge. No correlation between the general academic performance and grades of the students without RS or with RS was found, providing evidence that RS is an important tool in Advanced Cardiac Life Support education.

Medical education is undergoing various transformations to promote a more personalized and contextual way of learning. In light of this, the innovative "Self-directed, Problem-oriented, Lifelong learning, Integrated Clinical case Exercise" (SPLICE) modules were designed, implemented, and evaluated for medical students in the first professional year as a strategy for early clinical exposure in a collaborative and self-directed way of learning. This is a mixed methods study involving first-year medical students. Students were divided randomly into the control and the intervention groups. Six SPLICE modules were administered to the intervention while the control group followed the traditional curricula. The educational outcome was compared using an end-of-module assessment. In addition, 13-item and 8-item questionnaires were administered to students to evaluate the SPLICE and plenary sessions on a 5-point Likert scale. Furthermore, students' feedback was obtained on a 10-point rating scale and in in-depth small-group interviews. The majority of students perceived that the SPLICE module improved their communication and encouraged meaningful, active learning. Students found the plenary sessions to be well organized, with sufficient interaction with professionals. Students also gave excellent scores for feedback on SPLICE modules, demonstrating the effectiveness of the innovation. In terms of test scores used in assessing learning outcomes, the intervention group outperformed the control group (P < 0.0001). The innovative SPLICE curriculum facilitated early clinical exposure and active self-directed learning. Students perceived SPLICE modules to be highly helpful in terms of promoting meaningful learning and the future application of knowledge.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The very essence of this innovative "Self-directed, Problem-oriented, Lifelong learning, Integrated Clinical case Exercise" (SPLICE) curriculum is the team-based learning of integrated pre-, para-, and clinical learning objectives right from the first professional year of study serving as an early clinical exposure. This unique way of learning creates a holistic educational environment by combining both academic and professional development thereby empowering the next generation of physician leaders to take autonomy of their own learning strategies and emerge as competent lifelong learners.

Facilitating the learning of physiology by allied health majors who lack foundational coursework in biology and chemistry presents unique pedagogical challenges. By focusing on the strengths of this group of learners (team skills, interest in applied physiology), a new mechanism for conveying the primary interconnection and synergism of the body's organ systems was developed: the Great Organ Systems Debates. After learning sequentially about the primary organ systems, the Debates are a culminating, integrative experience, where students "debate" the relative importance of their system in different situations. Used and refined over several years, it is an engaging, interactive, and effective learning tool that could be adapted to almost any level of instruction.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Which organ system is "most important" when running a marathon? To answer this question, different groups of students were assigned different organ systems to see who could come up with the best argument.

This study was a part of a longitudinal study investigating the relationships between medical student wellness, self-efficacy, and performance. Eighty-two eligible students were asked to complete online surveys during their second (M2) and third (M3) years. Performance outcomes included scores on various summative assessments during the M.D. program. Wellness survey results indicated that the sample of 38 M2 and 28 M3 students were overall well and self-efficacious, and they broadly maintained similar wellness characteristics across their medical education despite COVID-19 disruptions. Twenty-three students completed both surveys, and a paired analysis for this subgroup showed modest increases in stress and burnout in the M3 year. Notable correlations were observed between self-efficacy for academic work and a whole range of wellness variables for M2 students. M2 academic performance was modestly correlated to self-efficacy (r_s = 0.38, P = 0.02, n = 38) and student burnout (r_s = -0.34, P = 0.04, n = 38). In contrast, for the M3 students there was little correlation between wellness, clinical self-efficacy, and clinical performance, with the only significant relationships observed to be between overall clinical self-efficacy and the strength of social networks (r_s = 0.41, P = 0.03, n = 28) and between scores for postencounter notes during Objective Structure Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) and self-efficacy in evidence-based medicine (r_s = 0.44, P = 0.02, n = 28). In conclusion, 1) students remained generally well throughout the post-COVID period, and 2) self-efficacy for academic work is a good predictor of student wellness and performance during the preclerkship period but not during clinical training.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study followed a group of medical students through the "post-COVID" period to assess their wellness as they transitioned from basic sciences to clinical training. We found that their wellness and belief in their ability to succeed (self-efficacy) remained strong, showing their resiliency. We observed correlations between self-efficacy and their level of wellness and academic performance during basic science classes but not during clinical training.

Learning outcomes are an essential element in curriculum development because they describe what students should be able to do by the end of a course or program and they provide a roadmap for designing assessments. This article describes the development of competency-based learning outcomes for a one-semester undergraduate introductory human physiology course. Key elements in the development process included decisions about terminology, eponyms, use of the word "normal," and similar considerations for inclusivity. The outcomes are keyed to related physiology core concepts and to process skills that can be taught along with the content. The learning outcomes have been published under a Creative Commons license by the Human Anatomy and Physiology Society (HAPS) and are available free of charge on the HAPS website.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This article describes the development of competency-based learning outcomes for introductory undergraduate human physiology courses that were published and made available free of charge by the Human Anatomy and Physiology Society (HAPS). These learning outcomes can be edited and are keyed to physiology core concepts and to process skills that can be taught along with the content.

The COVID-19 pandemic not only affected education at its peak, it continues to affect learning in its aftermath. High schools were forced to transition to remote learning, throwing students and educators alike into a new reality. Recovering from the pandemic has forced the need for innovative ways to engage students. Some successful attempts at modifying quizzes, lab activities, and assessments in my pathophysiology classroom are described in this article. In addition, students were also given extra time on assessments, and their feedback was incorporated into the course to improve it for future iterations. It was observed that student gains between pre- and posttests increased after the pandemic as a result of these modifications.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Different ways of modifying existing assessments and labs in a pathophysiology high school classroom are described. Novel assessments were modified after the COVID-19 pandemic to better engage students during the transition from remote to in-person learning after the pandemic. These activities prompted an increase in student test gains compared during and after the pandemic. It was concluded that incorporating student feedback and providing extra time for assessments helped students articulate better on assessments.