Advances in Enzymology and Related Subjects最新文献

Proteins, by virtue of their central role in most biological processes, represent one of the key subjects of the study of molecular evolution. Inherent in the indispensability of proteins for living cells is the fact that a given protein can adopt a specific three-dimensional shape that is specified solely by the protein's sequence of amino acids. Over the past several decades, structural biologists have demonstrated that the array of structures that proteins may adopt is quite astounding, and this has lead to a strong interest in understanding how protein structures change and evolve over time. In this review we consider a large body of recent work that attempts to illuminate this structure-centric picture of protein evolution. Much of this work has focused on the question of how completely new protein structures (i.e., new folds or topologies) are discovered by protein sequences as they evolve. Pursuant to this question of structural innovation has been a desire to describe and understand the observation that certain types of protein structures are far more abundant than others and how this uneven distribution of proteins implicates on the process through which new shapes are discovered. We consider a number of theoretical models that have been successful at explaining this heterogeneity in protein populations and discuss the increasing amount of evidence that indicates that the process of structural evolution involves the divergence of protein sequences and structures from one another. We also consider the topic of protein designability, which concerns itself with understanding how a protein's structure influences the number of sequences that can fold successfully into that structure. Understanding and quantifying the relationship between the physical feature of a structure and its designability has been a long-standing goal of the study of protein structure and evolution, and we discuss a number of recent advances that have yielded a promising answer to this question. Finally, we review the relatively new field of protein structural phylogeny, an area of study in which information about the distribution of protein structures among different organisms is used to reconstruct the evolutionary relationships between them. Taken together, the work that we review presents an increasingly coherent picture of how these unique polymers have evolved over the course of life on Earth.

The generation of enzymes with new catalytic activities remains a major challenge. So far, several different strategies have been developed to tackle this problem, including site-directed mutagenesis, random mutagenesis (directed evolution), antibody catalysis, computational redesign, and de novo methods. Using these techniques, a broad array of novel enzymes has been created (aldolases, decarboxylases, dehydratases, isomerases, oxidases, reductases, and others), although their low efficiencies (10 to 100 M(-1) s(-l)) compared to those of the best natural enzymes (10(6) to 10(8) M(-1) s(-1)) remains a significant concern. Whereas rational design might be the most promising and versatile approach to generating new activities, directed evolution seems to be the best way to optimize the catalytic properties of novel enzymes. Indeed, impressive successes in enzyme engineering have resulted from a combination of rational and random design.

Protein engineering holds great promise for the development of new biosensors, diagnostics, therapeutics, and agents for bioremediation. Despite some remarkable successes in experimental and computational protein design, engineered proteins rarely achieve the efficiency or specificity of natural enzymes. Current protein design methods utilize evolutionary concepts, including mutation, recombination, and selection, but the inability to fully recapitulate the success of natural evolution suggests that some evolutionary principles have not been fully exploited. One aspect of protein engineering that has received little attention is how to select the most promising proteins to serve as templates, or scaffolds, for engineering. Two evolutionary concepts that could provide a rational basis for template selection are the conservation of catalytic mechanisms and functional promiscuity. Knowledge of the catalytic motifs responsible for conserved aspects of catalysis in mechanistically diverse superfamilies could be used to identify promising templates for protein engineering. Second, protein evolution often proceeds through promiscuous intermediates, suggesting that templates which are naturally promiscuous for a target reaction could enhance protein engineering strategies. This review explores these ideas and alternative hypotheses concerning protein evolution and engineering. Future research will determine if application of these principles will lead to a protein engineering methodology governed by predictable rules for designing efficient, novel catalysts.

The bacterial PTE is able to catalyze the hydrolysis of a wide range of organophosphate nerve agents. The active site has been shown to consist of a unique binuclear metal center that has evolved to deliver hydroxide to the site of bond cleavage. The reaction rate for the hydrolysis of activated substrates such as paraoxon is limited by product release or an associated protein conformational change.

The enzyme L-aspartate ammonia-lyase (aspartase) catalyzes the reversible deamination of the amino acid L-aspartic acid, using a carbanion mechanism to produce fumaric acid and ammonium ion. Aspartase is among the most specific enzymes known with extensive studies failing, until recently, to identify any alternative amino acid substrates that can replace L-aspartic acid. Aspartases from different organisms show high sequence homology, and this homology extends to functionally related enzymes such as the class II fumarases, the argininosuccinate and adenylosuccinate lyases. The high-resolution structure of aspartase reveals a monomer that is composed of three domains oriented in an elongated S-shape. The central domain, comprised of five-helices, provides the subunit contacts in the functionally active tetramer. The active sites are located in clefts between the subunits and structural and mutagenic studies have identified several of the active site functional groups. While the catalytic activity of this enzyme has been known for nearly 100 years, a number of recent studies have revealed some interesting and unexpected new properties of this reasonably well-characterized enzyme. The non-linear kinetics that are seen under certain conditions have been shown to be caused by the presence of a separate regulatory site. The substrate, aspartic acid, can also play the role of an activator, binding at this site along with a required divalent metal ion. Truncation of the carboxyl terminus of aspartase at specific positions leads to an enhancement of the catalytic activity of the enzyme. Truncations in this region also have been found to introduce a new, non-enzymatic biological activity into aspartase, the ability to specifically enhance the activation of plasminogen to plasmin by tissue plasminogen activator. Even after a century of investigation there are clearly a number of aspects of this multifaceted enzyme that remain to be explored.

Phosphoribulokinase (PRK), an enzyme unique to the reductive pentose phosphate pathway of CO2 assimilation, exhibits distinctive contrasting properties when the proteins from eukaryotic and prokaryotic sources are compared. The eukaryotic PRKs are typically dimers of -39 kDa subunits while the prokaryotic PRKs are octamers of -32 kDa subunits. The enzymes from these two classes are regulated by different mechanisms. Thioredoxin of mediated thiol-disulfide exchange interconverts eukaryotic PRKs between reduced (active) and oxidized (inactive) forms. Allosteric effectors, including activator NADH and inhibitors AMP and phosphoenolpyruvate, regulate activity of prokaryotic PRK. The effector binding site has been identified in the high resolution structure recently elucidated for prokaryotic PRK and the7 apparatus for transmission of the allosteric stimulus has been identified. Additional contrasts between PRKs include marked differences in primary structure between eukaryotic and prokaryotic PRKs. Alignment of all available deduced PRK sequences indicates that less than 10% of the amino acid residues are invariant. In contrast to these differences, the mechanism for ribulose 1,5-biphosphate synthesis from ATP and ribulose 5-phosphate (Ru5P) appears to be the same for all PRKs. Consensus sequences associated with M++-ATP binding, identified in all PRK proteins, are closely juxtaposed to the residue proposed to function as general base catalyst. Sequence homology and mutagenesis approaches have suggested several residues that may potentially function in Ru5P binding. Not all of these proposed Ru5P binding residues are closely juxtaposed in the structure of unliganded PRK. Mechanistic approaches have been employed to investigate the amino acids which influence K(m Ru5P) and identify those amino acids most directly involved in Ru5P binding. PRK is one member of a family of phospho or sulfo transferase proteins which exhibit a nucleotide monophosphate kinase fold. Structure/function correlations elucidated for PRK suggest analogous assignments for other members of this family of proteins.