Academic Medicine最新文献

Purpose: Augmented reality (AR) can generate realistic holograms overlaid on the real-word environment to provide an interactive learning experience. However, further research is needed to assess the impact of such technologies on knowledge acquisition. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of an AR learning application in anatomy education.

Method: TEACHANATOMY, a controlled, randomized trial, was conducted from September 14-October 24, 2022, at the University of Zurich and Federal Institute of Technology. It included first- and second-year medical students with no prior anatomy education and compared learning with an interactive hologram-based AR learning application module incorporating adaptive learning technology and gamification elements with traditional learning (TL) methods, including textbooks, videos, and online resources. Forty-eight participants were randomly allocated to the AR or TL group. The primary outcome consisted of the scores on the theoretical and practical knowledge test sections. Secondary outcomes included adverse health symptoms and user experience.

Results: The AR group performed significantly better on both theoretical (median [IQR] scores: AR: 18.8 [16.6-20.0]; TL: 9.4 [7.7-11.3]; P < .001) and practical (AR: 14.0 [12.3-14.7]; TL: 5.0 [4.0-6.0]; P < .001) knowledge test sections. The most common adverse health symptoms were headache, reported by 13/24 (54.2%) TL participants and 9/24 (37.5%) AR participants, and fatigue, experienced by 13/24 (54.2%) TL participants and 2/24 (8.3%) AR participants. All participants evaluated learning with TEACHANATOMY as a positive experience, rating it as efficient and easy to understand. All participants agreed learning with AR can be beneficial in learning anatomy, with 89.6% (43/48) and 100% (48/48) expressing willingness to use AR as a learning tool for theoretical and practical anatomy learning, respectively.

Conclusions: Findings show a short-term learning benefit with the use of the TEACHANATOMY learning application, thus supporting the implementation of interactive hologram-based AR technologies to improve knowledge in anatomy education.

Abstract: A new ethos of anatomy education goes beyond the learning of body parts in the traditional curriculum. In the traditional curriculum, the focus of only providing information on the structure of the human body left certain learning opportunities overlooked, marginalized, or dismissed as irrelevant; thus, opportunities to foster and shape professional attributes in health care learners were lost. Furthermore, changes in curricula structures and reductions in anatomy teaching hours have necessitated a transformation in how anatomy education is perceived and delivered. This article presents an examination of a contemporary ethos of anatomy education that draws together concepts from teaching theory, educational trends, and emerging research to maximize the anatomy learning experience with body donors. Social constructivism, the spiral curriculum, and the hidden curriculum can be leveraged to facilitate a unique educational experience. Furthermore, contemporary perspectives on the ethics and history of anatomy that support contextual learning indicate how these subjects are well suited to authenticate and consolidate learning, while supporting the relational and humanistic delivery of health care education. When anatomy education is conceptualized as a first clinical experience in a health care curriculum, it provides the opportunity to develop and enhance professional identity formation at a foundational stage. By embracing and incorporating a wider range of considerations into educational practice, a new ethos for anatomy education fosters history-informed professional identity formation that offers transformative learning opportunities for an ethical practice in the art of healing.

Purpose: Serious games are increasingly used in medical education to actively engage learners. Analog serious games are a nondigital subset of serious games with specific purposes that go beyond entertainment. This scoping review describes the literature pertaining to analog serious games and provides recommendations regarding gaps and emerging directions for future research.

Method: The authors conducted a scoping review following the Arksey and O'Malley framework, searching 3 databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL) for studies of analog serious games designed for physician-track learners published from January 2013 through December 2023. Two authors independently screened the titles and abstracts, whereas 1 of 5 authors screened each full text and extracted data from eligible records. The authors iteratively analyzed the data within numerous categories and coded the findings to examine how the field has evolved during the past decade.

Results: The searches retrieved 3,955 records with 865 duplicates. The authors reviewed 3,090 title and abstract records and 202 full-text records. Eighty-eight records met the inclusion criteria, including research reports, conference abstracts, descriptive reports, and short innovation reports. The peak years for publications were 2019 and 2023 (15 publications each). Fewer abstracts and articles were published during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic (i.e., 2020-2022). The most common scholarship type was description studies (63 [72%]), whereas the dominant game formats were board games (51 [58%]) and card games (33 [38%]). Most studies tested analog serious games with medical students (60 [68%]) and/or residents and fellows (39 [44%]), with numerous studies including mixed study populations.

Conclusions: This scoping review demonstrates moderate growth within the field of analog serious games, along with numerous opportunities for future research. Although analog game-based learning cannot entirely replace traditional pedagogical approaches, analog serious games have potential to meaningfully complement education for physician-track learners in all medical training stages.