Academic Medicine最新文献

Abstract: During the past several decades, medical education research has advanced in many ways. However, the field has struggled somewhat with translating knowledge into practice. The field has tremendous potential to generate insights that may improve educational outcomes, enhance teaching experiences, reduce costs, promote equity, and inform policy. However, the gap between research and practice requires attention and reflection. In this commentary, the authors reflect on ways that medical education researchers can balance relevance and rigor, while discussing a potential path forward. First, medical education research can learn from implementation science, which focuses on adopting and sustaining best practices in real-world settings. Second, gaining a deeper understanding of the complex and dynamic ways that medical education contexts may influence the uptake of research findings into practice would facilitate the translation and mobilization of knowledge into practical settings. Third, moving from unilateral knowledge translation to participatory knowledge mobilization and engaging diverse stakeholders as active participants in the research process can also enhance impact and influence research findings. Overall, for medical education research to effect meaningful change, it must transition from producing generalizable findings to generating context-specific insights and embracing participatory knowledge mobilization. This shift will involve rethinking traditional research approaches and fostering collaboration with knowledge users to cocreate and implement innovative solutions tailored to their unique settings.

The purpose of this AM Last Page is to help faculty and postgraduate medical trainees (residents) identify resident teaching opportunities and foster teaching skill development. The Fundamental Teaching Activities (FTA) framework1 includes three domains in which physicians teach: Clinical Preceptor; Teacher Outside the Clinical Setting; and Educational Leader.

Purpose: Serious games are increasingly used in medical education to actively engage learners. Analog serious games are a nondigital subset of serious games with specific purposes that go beyond entertainment. This scoping review describes the literature pertaining to analog serious games and provides recommendations regarding gaps and emerging directions for future research.

Method: The authors conducted a scoping review following the Arksey and O'Malley framework, searching 3 databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL) for studies of analog serious games designed for physician-track learners published from January 2013 through December 2023. Two authors independently screened the titles and abstracts, whereas 1 of 5 authors screened each full text and extracted data from eligible records. The authors iteratively analyzed the data within numerous categories and coded the findings to examine how the field has evolved during the past decade.

Results: The searches retrieved 3,955 records with 865 duplicates. The authors reviewed 3,090 title and abstract records and 202 full-text records. Eighty-eight records met the inclusion criteria, including research reports, conference abstracts, descriptive reports, and short innovation reports. The peak years for publications were 2019 and 2023 (15 publications each). Fewer abstracts and articles were published during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic (i.e., 2020-2022). The most common scholarship type was description studies (63 [72%]), whereas the dominant game formats were board games (51 [58%]) and card games (33 [38%]). Most studies tested analog serious games with medical students (60 [68%]) and/or residents and fellows (39 [44%]), with numerous studies including mixed study populations.

Conclusions: This scoping review demonstrates moderate growth within the field of analog serious games, along with numerous opportunities for future research. Although analog game-based learning cannot entirely replace traditional pedagogical approaches, analog serious games have potential to meaningfully complement education for physician-track learners in all medical training stages.

Purpose: This study examines the feasibility and psychometric results of an assessment of entrustable professional activities (EPAs) as a core component of the clinical program of assessment in undergraduate medical education, assesses the learning curves for each EPA, explores the time to entrustment, and investigates the dependability of the EPA data based on generalizability theory (G theory) analysis.

Method: Third-year medical students from the University of Minnesota Medical School in 7 required clerkships from May 2022 through April 2023 were assessed. Students were required to obtain at least 4 EPA assessments per week on average from clinical faculty, residents supervising the students, or assessment and coaching experts. Student ratings were depicted as curves describing their performance over time; regression models were used to fit the curves.

Results: The complete class of 240 (138 women [58.0%] and 102 men [42.0%]) third-year medical students at the University of Minnesota Medical School (mean [SD] age at matriculation, 24.2 [2.7] years) participated. There were 32,614 EPA-based assessments (mean [SD], 136 [29.6] assessments per student). Reliability analysis using G theory found that an overall score dependability of 0.75 (range, 0-1) was achieved with 4 assessors on 4 occasions. The desired level of entrustment by academic year end was met by all 240 students (100%) for EPAs 1, 6, and 7, 237 (98.8%), 236 (98.3%), and 218 (90.8%) students for EPAs 2, 5, and 9, respectively, 197 students (82.1%) for EPA 3, 178 students (74.2%) for EPA 4, and 145 students (60.4%) for EPA 12. The most rapid growth was for EPA 2 (β0 = .286), followed by EPA 1 (β0 = .240), EPA 4 (β0 = .236), and EPA 10 (β0 = .230).

Conclusions: The study findings suggest that EPA ratings provide reliable and dependable data to make entrustment decisions about students' performance.

Purpose: Virtual patients (VPs) are increasingly used in health care professions education to support clinical reasoning (CR) development. However, the extent to which feedback is given across CR components is unknown, and guidance is lacking on how VPs can optimize CR development. This systematic review sought to identify how VPs provide feedback on CR.

Method: Seven databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ERIC, PsycINFO, Scopus, and ProQuest Dissertations) were searched in March 2023 using terms (e.g., medical education, virtual patient, case-based learning, computer simulation) adapted from a previous systematic review. All studies that described VP use for developing CR in medical professionals and provided feedback on at least 1 CR component were retrieved. Screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed. Narrative synthesis was performed to describe the approaches used to measure and provide feedback on CR.

Results: A total of 6,526 results were identified from searches, of which 72 met criteria, but only 35 full-text articles were analyzed because the reporting of interventions in abstracts (n = 37) was insufficient. The most common CR components developed by VPs were leading diagnosis (23 [65.7%]), management or treatment plan (23 [65.7%]), and information gathering (21 [60%]). The CR components were explored by various approaches, from redefined questions to free text and concept maps.

Conclusions: Studies describing VP use for giving CR feedback have mainly focused on easy-to-assess CR components, whereas few studies have described VPs designed for assessing CR components, such as problem representation, hypothesis generation, and diagnostic justification. Despite feedback being essential for learning, few VPs provided information on the learner's use of self-regulated learning processes. Educators designing or selecting VPs for CR use must consider the needs of learner groups and how different CR components can be explored and should make the instructional design of VPs explicit in published work.

Problem: Academic medical centers struggle with the high cost of care, reduced reimbursement, intense competition, and low profit margins. Many factors, including a high proportion of publicly insured patients, a model rewarding procedural specialties, and research and educational support burden, led to faculty salary inequities, physician disengagement, and difficulty recruiting.

Approach: UC Davis Health implemented an aligned funds flow model in July 2021 to create a mission-aligned model in which all departments had financial margins to optimize recruitment, retention, research, and teaching.

Outcomes: The 3-year experience (academic years 2021-2024) with this model at UC Davis Health was characterized by physician compensation, physician recruitment, and profit increases. Total collections for departments increased by 4% in the first year, 0.2% in the second year, and 11.3% in the third year of funds flow. Total productivity increased by 4.9% during the first year, 3.6% during the second year, and 8.4% during the third year. Salaries increased in all departmental categories in year 3. Productivity and collections per faculty member increased during the first year and were stable during the second and third years. Parity among procedural, primary care, and hospital-based service lines was improved because departmental revenue was agnostic to payer mix and hospital agreements were more formulaic. The hospital contribution to funds flow increased from $67 million in 2022 to $101 million in 2024.

Next steps: Regular communication and transparency are critical to ongoing trust and success with implementation of sustaining funds flow. The new model resulted in improved physician compensation and increased hiring. However, the implementation of funds flow had a negative fiscal effect on the academic medical center, and sustainability may require fine-tuning to balance affordability. The authors plan to convert outpatient primary care to productivity-based models and decrease time-limited support for new faculty from 2 years to 1 year.