AAPS Journal最新文献

The interpretation of immunogenicity results for a mAb product and prediction of its clinical consequences remain difficult, despite enormous advances in methodologies and efforts toward the best practice for consistent data generation and reporting. To this end, the contribution from the clinical pharmacology discipline has been largely limited to comparing descriptively the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles by antidrug antibodies (ADA) status or testing the significance of ADA as a covariate in a population PK setting, similar to the practice for small-molecule drugs in investigating the effect of an intrinsic/extrinsic factor on the drug disposition. There is a need for a mAb disposition framework that captures the dynamics of ADA formation and drug's interactions with the ADA and target as parts of the drug distribution and elimination. Here we describe such a framework and examine it against the PK, ADA, and clinical response data from a phase 3 trial in patients treated with adalimumab. The proposed framework offered a generalized understanding of how the dose, target affinity, and drug/ADA analyte forms affects the manifestation of ADA response with regard to its detections and alterations of drug disposition and effectiveness. Furthermore, as an example, its utility for dose considerations was demonstrated through predicting for late-stage trials of a PCSK9 inhibitor in terms of development in ADA incidence and titers, and consequences on the drug disposition, interaction with target, and downstream lowering effect on LDL-C.

Monoclonal antibodies in the prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19 have been crucial in reducing severe infections when vaccines were unavailable. However, as the virus and its variants have changed over time, the effectiveness of monoclonal antibodies has been questioned. This technical note highlights the need to assess the antiviral activity of these antibodies against new variants and adapt treatment strategies accordingly. On the one hand, in vitro studies have suggested reduced susceptibility of the latest variants to monoclonal antibodies, whereas clinical data still show benefits in reducing severe illness and mortality, indicating that laboratory results do not always mirror real-world outcomes. As a result, although resistance to monoclonal antibodies can develop over time, they could still have an important role in COVID-19 treatment, especially when used in combination, and ongoing research aims to identify effective antibodies against new variants.

Despite the promising potential of direct central nervous system (CNS) antibody administration to enhance brain exposure, there remains a significant gap in understanding the disposition of antibodies following different intra-CNS injection routes. To bridge this knowledge gap, this study quantitatively investigated the brain pharmacokinetics (PK) of antibodies following intra-CNS administration. The microdialysis samples from the striatum (ST), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples through cisterna magna (CM) puncture, plasma, and brain homogenate samples were collected to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) profiles of a non-targeting antibody, trastuzumab, following intracerebroventricular (ICV), intracisternal (ICM), and intrastriatal (IST) administration. For a comprehensive analysis, these intra-CNS injection datasets were juxtaposed against our previously acquired intravenous (IV) injection data obtained under analogous experimental conditions. Our findings highlighted that direct CSF injections, either through ICV or ICM, resulted in ~ 5-6-fold higher interstitial fluid (ISF) drug exposure than IV administration. Additionally, the low bioavailability observed following IST administration indicates the existence of a local degradation process for antibody elimination in the brain ISF along with the ISF bulk flow. The study further refined a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model based on new observations by adding the perivascular compartments, oscillated CSF flow, and the nonspecific uptake and degradation of antibodies by brain parenchymal cells. The updated model can well characterize the antibody PK following systemic and intra-CNS administration. Thus, our research offers quantitative insight into antibody brain disposition pathways and paves the way for determining optimal dosing and administration strategies for antibodies targeting CNS disorders.

With the evolving role of Model Integrated Evidence (MIE) in generic drug development and regulatory applications, the need for improving Model Sharing, Acceptance, and Communication with the FDA is warranted. Model Master File (MMF) refers to a quantitative model or a modeling platform that has undergone sufficient model Verification & Validation to be recognized as sharable intellectual property that is acceptable for regulatory purposes. MMF provides a framework for regulatorily acceptable modeling practice, which can be used with confidence to support MIE by both the industry and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In 2022, the FDA and the Center for Research on Complex Generics (CRCG) hosted a virtual public workshop to discuss the best practices for utilizing modeling approaches to support generic product development. This report summarizes the presentations and panel discussions of the workshop symposium entitled "Model Sharing, Acceptance, and Communication with the FDA". The symposium and this report serve as a kick-off discussion for further utilities of MMF and best practices of utilizing MMF in drug development and regulatory submissions. The potential advantages of MMFs have garnered acknowledgment from model developers, industries, and the FDA throughout the workshop. To foster a unified comprehension of MMFs and establish best practices for their application, further dialogue and cooperation among stakeholders are imperative. To this end, a subsequent workshop is scheduled for May 2-3, 2024, in Rockville, Maryland, aiming to delve into the practical facets and best practices of MMFs pertinent to regulatory submissions involving modeling and simulation methodologies.

CYP3A is one of the most important classes of enzymes and is involved in the metabolism of over 70% drugs. While several selective CYP3A4 inhibitors have been identified, the search for a selective CYP3A5 inhibitor has turned out to be rather challenging. Recently, several selective CYP3A5 inhibitors have been identified through high-throughput screening of ~ 11,000 compounds and hit expansion using human recombinant enzymes. We set forth to characterize the three most selective CYP3A5 inhibitors in a more physiologically relevant system of human liver microsomes to understand if these inhibitors can be used for reaction phenotyping studies in drug discovery settings. Gomisin A and T-5 were used as selective substrate reactions for CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 to determine IC₅₀ values of the two enzymes. The results showed that clobetasol propionate and loteprednol etabonate were potent and selective CYP3A5 reversible inhibitors with selectivity of 24-fold against CYP3A4 and 39-fold or more against the other major CYPs. The selectivity of difluprednate in HLM is much weaker than that in the recombinant enzymes due to hydrolysis of the acetate group in HLM. Based on the selectivity data, loteprednol etabonate can be utilized as an orthogonal approach, when experimental fraction metabolized of CYP3A5 is greater than 0.5, to understand CYP3A5 contribution to drug metabolism and its clinical significance. Future endeavors to identify even more selective CYP3A5 inhibitors are warranted to enable accurate determination of CYP3A5 contribution to metabolism versus CYP3A4.

Degradation of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) is a major concern as it affects efficacy, shelf-life, and safety of the product. Taurine, a naturally occurring amino acid, is investigated in this study as a potential mAb stabilizer with an extensive analytical characterization to monitor product degradation. Forced degradation of trastuzumab biosimilar (mAb1)-containing samples by thermal stress for 30 min resulted in high-molecular-weight species by more than 65% in sample without taurine compared to the sample with taurine. Samples containing mAb1 without taurine also resulted in higher Z-average diameter, altered protein structure, higher hydrophobicity, and lower melting temperature compared to samples with taurine. The stabilizing effect of taurine was retained at different mAb and taurine concentrations, time, temperatures, and buffers, and at the presence of polysorbate 80 (PS80). Even the lowest taurine concentration (10 mM) considered in this study, which is in the range of taurine levels in amino acid injections, resulted in enhanced mAb stability. Taurine-containing samples resulted in 90% less hemolysis than samples containing PS80. Additionally, mAb in the presence of taurine showed enhanced stability upon subjecting to stress with light of 365 nm wavelength, combination of light and H₂O₂, and combination of Fe²⁺ and H₂O₂, as samples containing mAb without taurine resulted in increased degradation products by more than 50% compared to samples with taurine upon subjecting to these stresses for 60 min. In conclusion, the presence of taurine enhanced physical stability of mAb by preventing aggregate formation, and the industry can consider it as a new mAb stabilizer.

The emerging use of qPCR and dPCR in regulated bioanalysis and absence of regulatory guidance on assay validations for these platforms has resulted in discussions on lack of harmonization on assay design and appropriate acceptance criteria for these assays. Both qPCR and dPCR are extensively used to answer bioanalytical questions for novel modalities such as cell and gene therapies. Following cross-industry conversations on the lack of information and guidelines for these assays, an American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists working group was formed to address these gaps by bringing together 37 industry experts from 24 organizations to discuss best practices to gain a better understanding in the industry and facilitate filings to health authorities. Herein, this team provides considerations on assay design, development, and validation testing for PCR assays that are used in cell and gene therapies including (1) biodistribution; (2) transgene expression; (3) viral shedding; (4) and persistence or cellular kinetics of cell therapies.

It is generally believed that bioavailability (F) calculated based on systemic concentration area under the curve (AUC) measurements cannot exceed 1.0, yet some published studies report this inconsistency. We teach and believe, based on differential equation derivations, that rate of absorption has no influence on measured systemic clearance following an oral dose, i.e., determined as available dose divided by AUC. Previously, it was thought that any difference in calculating F from urine data versus that from systemic concentration AUC data was due to the inability to accurately measure urine data. A PubMed literature search for drugs exhibiting F > 1.0 and studies for which F was measured using both AUC and urinary excretion dose-corrected analyses yielded data for 35 drugs. We show and explain, using Kirchhoff's Laws, that these universally held concepts concerning bioavailability may not be valid in all situations. Bioavailability, determined using systemic concentration measurements, for many drugs may be overestimated since AUC reflects not only systemic elimination but also absorption rate characteristics, which is most easily seen for renal clearance measures. Clearance of drug from the absorption site must be significantly greater than clearance following an iv bolus dose for F(AUC) to correctly correspond with F(urine). The primary purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that studies resulting in F > 1.0 and/or greater systemic vs urine bioavailability predictions may be accurate. Importantly, these explications have no significant impact on current regulatory guidance for bioequivalence testing, nor on the use of exposure (AUC) measures in making drug dosing decisions.

Immunogenicity assessment is an essential part of biotherapeutic drug development. While the immune response in animals is not always representative of the human immune response, immunogenicity data obtained in animal models is still informative for the evaluation of drug exposure and safety. The most common assay format used for the detection of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) in preclinical and clinical studies is the bridging format. The advantage of this method is that it can detect all antibody isotypes generated against the therapeutic. However, the method development can be time-consuming and labor-intensive, due to the need for labeling of the drug which is used both as capture and detection. Various generic ADA assays have been successfully implemented to overcome these disadvantages and to enable faster assay development timelines to support nonclinical toxicology studies. Here, we describe the challenges in the development of an assay to detect antibodies to zinpentraxin alfa, a recombinant human pentraxin-2, in rabbit and rat toxicology studies. Our initial efforts to develop a bridging assay failed, prompting us to develop a method adapted from generic assay formats to detect anti-zinpentraxin alfa antibodies in the serum of different species with minimal optimization. However, while the general assay format remained similar, assay reagents were adapted between the different species, resulting in the development of two distinct assays for the detection of ADAs in rat and rabbit. Here, we share the final development/validation data and the immunogenicity study results. Our work highlights the need for the evaluation of alternate assay formats when evaluating novel drug modalities.