ACM Transactions on Information Systems最新文献

Recommender systems are expected to be assistants that help human users find relevant information automatically without explicit queries. As recommender systems evolve, increasingly sophisticated learning techniques are applied and have achieved better performance in terms of user engagement metrics such as clicks and browsing time. The increase in the measured performance, however, can have two possible attributions: a better understanding of user preferences, and a more proactive ability to utilize human bounded rationality to seduce user over-consumption. A natural following question is whether current recommendation algorithms are manipulating user preferences. If so, can we measure the manipulation level? In this paper, we present a general framework for benchmarking the degree of manipulations of recommendation algorithms, in both slate recommendation and sequential recommendation scenarios. The framework consists of four stages, initial preference calculation, training data collection, algorithm training and interaction, and metrics calculation that involves two proposed metrics, Manipulation Score and Preference Shift. We benchmark some representative recommendation algorithms in both synthetic and real-world datasets under the proposed framework. We have observed that a high online click-through rate does not necessarily mean a better understanding of user initial preference, but ends in prompting users to choose more documents they initially did not favor. Moreover, we find that the training data have notable impacts on the manipulation degrees, and algorithms with more powerful modeling abilities are more sensitive to such impacts. The experiments also verified the usefulness of the proposed metrics for measuring the degree of manipulations. We advocate that future recommendation algorithm studies should be treated as an optimization problem with constrained user preference manipulations.

The learning objective plays a fundamental role to build a recommender system. Most methods routinely adopt either pointwise (e.g., binary cross-entropy) or pairwise (e.g., BPR) loss to train the model parameters, while rarely pay attention to softmax loss, which assumes the probabilities of all classes sum up to 1, due to its computational complexity when scaling up to large datasets or intractability for streaming data where the complete item space is not always available. The sampled softmax (SSM) loss emerges as an efficient substitute for softmax loss. Its special case, InfoNCE loss, has been widely used in self-supervised learning and exhibited remarkable performance for contrastive learning. Nonetheless, limited recommendation work uses the SSM loss as the learning objective. Worse still, none of them explores its properties thoroughly and answers “Does SSM loss suit for item recommendation?” and “What are the conceptual advantages of SSM loss, as compared with the prevalent losses?”, to the best of our knowledge.

In this work, we aim to offer a better understanding of SSM for item recommendation. Specifically, we first theoretically reveal three model-agnostic advantages: (1) mitigating popularity bias, which is beneficial to long-tail recommendation; (2) mining hard negative samples, which offers informative gradients to optimize model parameters; and (3) maximizing the ranking metric, which facilitates top-K performance. However, based on our empirical studies, we recognize that the default choice of cosine similarity function in SSM limits its ability in learning the magnitudes of representation vectors. As such, the combinations of SSM with the models that also fall short in adjusting magnitudes (e.g., matrix factorization) may result in poor representations. One step further, we provide mathematical proof that message passing schemes in graph convolution networks can adjust representation magnitude according to node degree, which naturally compensates for the shortcoming of SSM. Extensive experiments on four benchmark datasets justify our analyses, demonstrating the superiority of SSM for item recommendation. Our implementations are available in both TensorFlow and PyTorch.

Accurately predicting individual-level infection state is of great value since its essential role in reducing the damage of the epidemic. However, there exists an inescapable risk of privacy leakage in the fine-grained user mobility trajectories required by individual-level infection prediction. In this paper, we focus on developing a framework of privacy-preserving individual-level infection prediction based on federated learning (FL) and graph neural networks (GNN). We propose Falcon, a Federated grAph Learning method for privacy-preserving individual-level infeCtion predictiON. It utilizes a novel hypergraph structure with spatio-temporal hyperedges to describe the complex interactions between individuals and locations in the contagion process. By organically combining the FL framework with hypergraph neural networks, the information propagation process of the graph machine learning is able to be divided into two stages distributed on the server and the clients, respectively, so as to effectively protect user privacy while transmitting high-level information. Furthermore, it elaborately designs a differential privacy perturbation mechanism as well as a plausible pseudo location generation approach to preserve user privacy in the graph structure. Besides, it introduces a cooperative coupling mechanism between the individual-level prediction model and an additional region-level model to mitigate the detrimental impacts caused by the injected obfuscation mechanisms. Extensive experimental results show that our methodology outperforms state-of-the-art algorithms and is able to protect user privacy against actual privacy attacks. Our code and datasets are available at the link: https://github.com/wjfu99/FL-epidemic.

Sparse representation learning based on Pre-trained Language Models has seen a growing interest in Information Retrieval. Such approaches can take advantage of the proven efficiency of inverted indexes, and inherit desirable IR priors such as explicit lexical matching or some degree of interpretability. In this work, we thoroughly develop the framework of sparse representation learning in IR, which unifies term weighting and expansion in a supervised setting. We then build on SPLADE – a sparse expansion-based retriever – and show to which extent it is able to benefit from the same training improvements as dense bi-encoders, by studying the effect of distillation, hard negative mining as well as the Pre-trained Language Model’s initialization on its effectiveness – leading to state-of-the-art results in both in- and out-of-domain evaluation settings (SPLADE++). We furthermore propose efficiency improvements, allowing us to reach latency requirements on par with traditional keyword-based approaches (Efficient-SPLADE).

Contextual ranking models have delivered impressive performance improvements over classical models in the document ranking task. However, these highly over-parameterized models tend to be data-hungry and require large amounts of data even for fine-tuning. In this paper, we propose data-augmentation methods for effective and robust ranking performance. One of the key benefits of using data augmentation is in achieving sample efficiency or learning effectively when we have only a small amount of training data. We propose supervised and unsupervised data augmentation schemes by creating training data using parts of the relevant documents in the query-document pairs. We then adapt a family of contrastive losses for the document ranking task that can exploit the augmented data to learn an effective ranking model. Our extensive experiments on subsets of the MS MARCO and TREC-DL test sets show that data augmentation, along with the ranking-adapted contrastive losses, results in performance improvements under most dataset sizes. Apart from sample efficiency, we conclusively show that data augmentation results in robust models when transferred to out-of-domain benchmarks. Our performance improvements in in-domain and more prominently in out-of-domain benchmarks show that augmentation regularizes the ranking model and improves its robustness and generalization capability.

While Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs) have shown great potential in recommender systems and collaborative filtering (CF), they suffer from expensive computational complexity and poor scalability. On top of that, recent works mostly combine GCNs with other advanced algorithms which further sacrifice model efficiency and scalability. In this work, we unveil the redundancy of existing GCN-based methods in three aspects: (1) Feature redundancy. By reviewing GCNs from a spectral perspective, we show that most spectral graph features are noisy for recommendation, while stacking graph convolution layers can suppress but cannot completely remove the noisy features, which we mostly summarize from our previous work; (2) Structure redundancy. By providing a deep insight into how user/item representations are generated, we show that what makes them distinctive lies in the spectral graph features, while the core idea of GCNs (i.e., neighborhood aggregation) is not the reason making GCNs effective; and (3) Distribution redundancy. Following observations from (1), we further show that the number of required spectral features is closely related to the spectral distribution, where important information tends to be concentrated in more (fewer) spectral features on a flatter (sharper) distribution. To make important information be concentrated in as few features as possible, we sharpen the spectral distribution by increasing the node similarity without changing the original data, thereby reducing the computational cost. To remove these three kinds of redundancies, we propose a Simplified Graph Denoising Encoder (SGDE) only exploiting the top-K singular vectors without explicitly aggregating neighborhood, which significantly reduces the complexity of GCN-based methods. We further propose a scalable contrastive learning framework to alleviate data sparsity and to boost model robustness and generalization, leading to significant improvement. Extensive experiments on three real-world datasets show that our proposed SGDE not only achieves state-of-the-art but also shows higher scalability and efficiency than our previously proposed GDE as well as traditional and GCN-based CF methods.

Most conversational passage retrieval systems try to resolve conversational dependencies by using an intermediate query resolution step. To do so, they synthesize conversational data or assume the availability of large-scale question rewritting datasets. To relax those conditions, we propose a zero-shot unified resolution–retrieval approach, that (i) contextualizes and (ii) expands query embeddings using the conversation history and without fine-tuning on conversational data. Contextualization biases the last user question embeddings towards the conversation. Query expansion is used in two ways: (i) abstractive expansion generates embeddings based on the current question and previous history, whereas (ii) extractive expansion tries to identify history term embeddings based on attention weights from the retriever. Our experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of both contextualization and unified expansion in improving conversational retrieval. Contextualization does so mostly by resolving anaphoras to the conversation and bringing their embeddings closer to the important resolution terms that were omitted. By adding embeddings to the query, expansion targets phenomena of ellipsis more explicitly, with our analysis verifying its effectiveness on identifying and adding important resolutions to the query. By combining contextualization and expansion, we find that our zero-shot unified resolution–retrieval methods are competitive and can even outperform supervised methods.