Pub Date : 2023-12-25DOI: 10.1177/27536386231220947
Peter O’Meara
In the United States (U.S.), the Subcommittee on Adaptability and Innovation of the National Emergency Medical Services Advisory Council (NEMSAC) recently recommended that a clinically focused Master of Science in Paramedicine (MSP) be developed as the standard minimum academic degree to meet the educational needs of paramedic practitioners in the U.S. Despite the significance of this initiative and support within EMS agencies and amongst paramedics, the advisory has met with fierce opposition from fire agencies and associations, some employer groups and surprisingly the National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians.
{"title":"Shuffling toward paramedic practitioners in the United States","authors":"Peter O’Meara","doi":"10.1177/27536386231220947","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536386231220947","url":null,"abstract":"In the United States (U.S.), the Subcommittee on Adaptability and Innovation of the National Emergency Medical Services Advisory Council (NEMSAC) recently recommended that a clinically focused Master of Science in Paramedicine (MSP) be developed as the standard minimum academic degree to meet the educational needs of paramedic practitioners in the U.S. Despite the significance of this initiative and support within EMS agencies and amongst paramedics, the advisory has met with fierce opposition from fire agencies and associations, some employer groups and surprisingly the National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians.","PeriodicalId":509430,"journal":{"name":"Paramedicine","volume":"26 1","pages":"45 - 47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139159027","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-19DOI: 10.1177/27536386231220966
Lucinda Peacock, Rachel Lewandowsky, Kelly Ann-Bowles, Bill Lord, Tim Andrews
Chronic pain is highly prevalent among the global population and has a significant impact on a patient's livelihood in multiple areas. Chronic pain is now more widely recognised as a standalone medical condition by most healthcare disciplines, separate from that of acute pain. This has allowed for the development of a unique evidence-based approach to caring for these patients, which incorporates the biological, psychological, and social dimensions in which chronic pain transverses. However, in the paramedic practice setting, chronic pain has received scant mention. This knowledge gap leaves many paramedics operating without guidelines suitable for the care of chronic pain patients or an epidemiological foundation describing the incidence or treatment requirements of this patient cohort. Most importantly, the perspectives and experiences of chronic pain patients who are treated by paramedics have yet to be investigated which is vital to ensure relevant care. To describe and understand the experience of patients requiring ambulance attendance for chronic pain-related complaints. Six participants were enlisted using convenience sampling. Participants responded, via Zoom, to an inductive, semi-structured interview. Analysis was performed using qualitative reflexive thematic analysis with a non-positivist, constructive approach. The themes identified were ‘the impact of stigma’ and ‘inadequate paramedic education’. Most participants shared similar attitudes and experiences regarding paramedic management, expressing dissatisfaction with the current standard of practice in relation to chronic pain complaints. Patients experiencing chronic pain are underserved by the standard of care being offered in this practice setting. Concerns raised by patients centred around the impact both stigma and educational understanding have on treatment. These findings indicate a need for further research, including the revision of guidelines and consideration of the patient perspective to be conducted in this area.
{"title":"Chronic pain in the paramedic practice setting – a qualitative study of patients’ perspective","authors":"Lucinda Peacock, Rachel Lewandowsky, Kelly Ann-Bowles, Bill Lord, Tim Andrews","doi":"10.1177/27536386231220966","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536386231220966","url":null,"abstract":"Chronic pain is highly prevalent among the global population and has a significant impact on a patient's livelihood in multiple areas. Chronic pain is now more widely recognised as a standalone medical condition by most healthcare disciplines, separate from that of acute pain. This has allowed for the development of a unique evidence-based approach to caring for these patients, which incorporates the biological, psychological, and social dimensions in which chronic pain transverses. However, in the paramedic practice setting, chronic pain has received scant mention. This knowledge gap leaves many paramedics operating without guidelines suitable for the care of chronic pain patients or an epidemiological foundation describing the incidence or treatment requirements of this patient cohort. Most importantly, the perspectives and experiences of chronic pain patients who are treated by paramedics have yet to be investigated which is vital to ensure relevant care. To describe and understand the experience of patients requiring ambulance attendance for chronic pain-related complaints. Six participants were enlisted using convenience sampling. Participants responded, via Zoom, to an inductive, semi-structured interview. Analysis was performed using qualitative reflexive thematic analysis with a non-positivist, constructive approach. The themes identified were ‘the impact of stigma’ and ‘inadequate paramedic education’. Most participants shared similar attitudes and experiences regarding paramedic management, expressing dissatisfaction with the current standard of practice in relation to chronic pain complaints. Patients experiencing chronic pain are underserved by the standard of care being offered in this practice setting. Concerns raised by patients centred around the impact both stigma and educational understanding have on treatment. These findings indicate a need for further research, including the revision of guidelines and consideration of the patient perspective to be conducted in this area.","PeriodicalId":509430,"journal":{"name":"Paramedicine","volume":"115 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139172353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-11DOI: 10.1177/27536386231219004
Paul Simpson
{"title":"How good is good enough…and why wasn’t my paper published?","authors":"Paul Simpson","doi":"10.1177/27536386231219004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536386231219004","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":509430,"journal":{"name":"Paramedicine","volume":"39 1","pages":"1 - 4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139183177","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-28DOI: 10.1177/27536386231215608
Jack Howard, Eystein Grusd, Don Rice, Nikiah G. Nudell, Carlos Lipscombe, Matthew Shepherd, Alexander Olaussen
Improved prehospital systems are contributing to increased presentations of CPR-Induced Consciousness (CPRIC). Data registries do not report CPRIC presentations and thus continued lack of evidence exists, causing a significant variation of prehospital CPRIC management guidelines. The result is variation in recognizing and managing CPRIC. Steps are needed to improve knowledge of CPRIC and model evidence-based guidelines. An international panel of experts was recruited to create CPRIC definitions, guidelines, and a reporting framework which can be used for reporting purposes. A Delphi methodology was used to gain consensus, defined as ≥70% agreement rate, on three domains or areas of interest: Definition, management guideline and data reporting. Participants were invited from the author's professional organizations, as well as social media outlets to recruit as many international clinicians as possible. The study administered four rounds of online surveys. Each round had multiple consensus statements for participants to respond to. Eighty-two percent of panelists reported seeing or managing CPRIC suggesting either improved awareness or increased exposure. Consensus was achieved in all three domains. There was agreement on a clear definition of CPRIC. The panel developed two subgroups of CPRIC; interfering and non-interfering CPRIC. Ketamine was the preferred choice to treat CPRIC. Panelists overwhelmingly felt CPRIC needed to be included into the Utstein guidelines. This study successfully created definitions of CPRIC, management guidelines, and a data reporting framework. Using this study as a building block, the study team hopes stronger, evidence-based guidelines can now be researched and published.
{"title":"Development of an international prehospital CPR-induced consciousness guideline: A Delphi study","authors":"Jack Howard, Eystein Grusd, Don Rice, Nikiah G. Nudell, Carlos Lipscombe, Matthew Shepherd, Alexander Olaussen","doi":"10.1177/27536386231215608","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536386231215608","url":null,"abstract":"Improved prehospital systems are contributing to increased presentations of CPR-Induced Consciousness (CPRIC). Data registries do not report CPRIC presentations and thus continued lack of evidence exists, causing a significant variation of prehospital CPRIC management guidelines. The result is variation in recognizing and managing CPRIC. Steps are needed to improve knowledge of CPRIC and model evidence-based guidelines. An international panel of experts was recruited to create CPRIC definitions, guidelines, and a reporting framework which can be used for reporting purposes. A Delphi methodology was used to gain consensus, defined as ≥70% agreement rate, on three domains or areas of interest: Definition, management guideline and data reporting. Participants were invited from the author's professional organizations, as well as social media outlets to recruit as many international clinicians as possible. The study administered four rounds of online surveys. Each round had multiple consensus statements for participants to respond to. Eighty-two percent of panelists reported seeing or managing CPRIC suggesting either improved awareness or increased exposure. Consensus was achieved in all three domains. There was agreement on a clear definition of CPRIC. The panel developed two subgroups of CPRIC; interfering and non-interfering CPRIC. Ketamine was the preferred choice to treat CPRIC. Panelists overwhelmingly felt CPRIC needed to be included into the Utstein guidelines. This study successfully created definitions of CPRIC, management guidelines, and a data reporting framework. Using this study as a building block, the study team hopes stronger, evidence-based guidelines can now be researched and published.","PeriodicalId":509430,"journal":{"name":"Paramedicine","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139215432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-05DOI: 10.1177/27536386231205064
{"title":"Erratum to “Acceptability of Australian prehospital care quality indicators: An explanatory sequential mixed methods study”","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/27536386231205064","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536386231205064","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":509430,"journal":{"name":"Paramedicine","volume":"128 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139323163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-05DOI: 10.1177/27536386231205072
{"title":"Erratum to “Profiling the Australasian paramedicine tertiary academic sector and workforce: A cross-sectional study.”","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/27536386231205072","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536386231205072","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":509430,"journal":{"name":"Paramedicine","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139322866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：