首页 > 最新文献

Advances in Health Sciences Education最新文献

英文 中文
Exploring the adoption of concept-based curricula: insights from educators and implications for change. 探索采用基于概念的课程:教育工作者的见解和对变革的影响。
IF 4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI: 10.1007/s10459-024-10346-y
Judith Tweedie, Fiona Pelly, Hattie Wright, Claire Palermo

Concept-based approaches to curriculum design have been proposed to solve content and curricula overload and promote conceptual learning. Few health professions have adopted this approach and little is known about how to support this educational change. We aimed to understand how nutrition and dietetics educators may navigate proposed education change towards concept-based curricula. We employed an interpretivist approach and in-depth interviews that explored the views of nutrition and dietetic educators towards using a concept-based approach to curriculum. Employing deductive thematic analysis based on the diffusion of innovation theory, data from twenty experienced dietetics educators were analysed. Three main themes were identified; the need for change champions, concerns about change, and the complexity of the education system. Diffusion of innovation theory highlighted that to enact change, the relative advantage and compatibility of the approach with current structures and systems, with evidence from trialling and observing the new approach in action, were needed. Developing education leaders and infiltrating the social system of education through existing communities of practice is critical to enacting educational change.

有人提出以概念为基础的课程设计方法,以解决内容和课程负担过重的问题,并促进概念学习。很少有健康专业采用这种方法,而对于如何支持这种教育变革也知之甚少。我们旨在了解营养与饮食学教育工作者如何引导拟议中的教育变革,实现基于概念的课程。我们采用了解释主义方法和深度访谈,探讨了营养与饮食教育工作者对使用基于概念的课程方法的看法。我们采用基于创新扩散理论的演绎主题分析法,分析了来自 20 位经验丰富的营养学教育工作者的数据。确定了三大主题:对变革倡导者的需求、对变革的担忧以及教育系统的复杂性。创新扩散理论强调,要实施变革,就必须证明新方法的相对优势以及与当前结构和系统的兼容性,并通过试用和观察新方法的实施情况来证明这一点。培养教育领导者并通过现有的实践社区渗透到教育的社会体系中,对于实施教育变革至关重要。
{"title":"Exploring the adoption of concept-based curricula: insights from educators and implications for change.","authors":"Judith Tweedie, Fiona Pelly, Hattie Wright, Claire Palermo","doi":"10.1007/s10459-024-10346-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-024-10346-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Concept-based approaches to curriculum design have been proposed to solve content and curricula overload and promote conceptual learning. Few health professions have adopted this approach and little is known about how to support this educational change. We aimed to understand how nutrition and dietetics educators may navigate proposed education change towards concept-based curricula. We employed an interpretivist approach and in-depth interviews that explored the views of nutrition and dietetic educators towards using a concept-based approach to curriculum. Employing deductive thematic analysis based on the diffusion of innovation theory, data from twenty experienced dietetics educators were analysed. Three main themes were identified; the need for change champions, concerns about change, and the complexity of the education system. Diffusion of innovation theory highlighted that to enact change, the relative advantage and compatibility of the approach with current structures and systems, with evidence from trialling and observing the new approach in action, were needed. Developing education leaders and infiltrating the social system of education through existing communities of practice is critical to enacting educational change.</p>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141201125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Factors influencing clinician-educators' assessment practice in varied Southern contexts: a health behaviour theory perspective. 在南方不同环境中影响临床教育工作者评估实践的因素:健康行为理论视角。
IF 4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-05-29 DOI: 10.1007/s10459-024-10341-3
Danica Anne Sims, César Alberto Lucio-Ramirez, Francois J Cilliers

In many contexts, responsibility for exit-level assessment design and implementation in undergraduate medical programmes lies with individuals who convene clinical clerkships. Their assessment practice has significant consequences for students' learning and the patients and communities that graduates will serve. Interventions to enhance assessment must involve these assessors, yet little is known about factors influencing their assessment practice. The purpose of this study was to explore factors that influence assessment practice of clerkship convenors in three varied low-and-middle income contexts in the global South. Taking assessment practice as a behaviour, Health Behaviour Theory (HBT) was deployed as a theoretical framework to explore, describe and explain assessor behaviour. Thirty-one clinician-educators responsible for designing and implementing high-stakes clerkship assessment were interviewed in South Africa and Mexico. Interacting personal and contextual factors influencing clinician-educator assessment intention and action were identified. These included attitude, influenced by impact and response appraisal, and perceived self-efficacy; along with interpersonal, physical and organisational, and distal contextual factors. Personal competencies and conducive environments supported intention to action transition. While previous research has typically explored factors in isolation, the HBT framing enabled a systematic and coherent account of assessor behaviour. These findings add a particular contextual perspective to understanding assessment practice, yet also resonate with and extend existing work that predominantly emanates from high-income contexts in the global North. These findings provide a foundation for the planning of assessment change initiatives, such as targeted, multi-factorial faculty development.

在许多情况下,本科医学课程中毕业水平评估的设计和实施由召集临床实习的个人负责。他们的评估实践对学生的学习以及毕业生所服务的患者和社区有着重大影响。加强评估的干预措施必须有这些评估者的参与,但人们对影响他们评估实践的因素知之甚少。本研究的目的是探讨在全球南部三种不同的中低收入环境中影响实习召集人评估实践的因素。将评估实践作为一种行为,采用健康行为理论(HBT)作为理论框架来探索、描述和解释评估者的行为。研究人员在南非和墨西哥采访了 31 名负责设计和实施高风险实习评估的临床教育工作者。确定了影响临床教师-教育者评估意向和行动的相互作用的个人和环境因素。这些因素包括受影响和反应评估影响的态度、感知的自我效能以及人际关系、物质和组织以及远距离环境因素。个人能力和有利环境支持从意向到行动的转变。以往的研究通常是孤立地探讨各种因素,而 HBT 框架能够对评估者的行为进行系统而连贯的描述。这些发现为理解评估实践增添了一个特殊的背景视角,同时也与主要来自全球北方高收入背景的现有工作产生了共鸣,并对其进行了扩展。这些发现为规划评估改革措施(如有针对性的、多因素的教师发展)奠定了基础。
{"title":"Factors influencing clinician-educators' assessment practice in varied Southern contexts: a health behaviour theory perspective.","authors":"Danica Anne Sims, César Alberto Lucio-Ramirez, Francois J Cilliers","doi":"10.1007/s10459-024-10341-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-024-10341-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In many contexts, responsibility for exit-level assessment design and implementation in undergraduate medical programmes lies with individuals who convene clinical clerkships. Their assessment practice has significant consequences for students' learning and the patients and communities that graduates will serve. Interventions to enhance assessment must involve these assessors, yet little is known about factors influencing their assessment practice. The purpose of this study was to explore factors that influence assessment practice of clerkship convenors in three varied low-and-middle income contexts in the global South. Taking assessment practice as a behaviour, Health Behaviour Theory (HBT) was deployed as a theoretical framework to explore, describe and explain assessor behaviour. Thirty-one clinician-educators responsible for designing and implementing high-stakes clerkship assessment were interviewed in South Africa and Mexico. Interacting personal and contextual factors influencing clinician-educator assessment intention and action were identified. These included attitude, influenced by impact and response appraisal, and perceived self-efficacy; along with interpersonal, physical and organisational, and distal contextual factors. Personal competencies and conducive environments supported intention to action transition. While previous research has typically explored factors in isolation, the HBT framing enabled a systematic and coherent account of assessor behaviour. These findings add a particular contextual perspective to understanding assessment practice, yet also resonate with and extend existing work that predominantly emanates from high-income contexts in the global North. These findings provide a foundation for the planning of assessment change initiatives, such as targeted, multi-factorial faculty development.</p>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141176834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sociotechnical imaginaries in academic medicine strategic planning: a document analysis 学术医学战略规划中的社会技术想象:文献分析。
IF 3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-05-27 DOI: 10.1007/s10459-024-10339-x
Paula Rowland, Madison Brydges, Kulamakan (Mahan) Kulasegaram

Purpose Along with other industries, healthcare is becoming increasingly digitized. Our study explores how the field of academic medicine is preparing for this digital future. Method Active strategic plans available in English were collected from faculties of medicine in Canada (n = 14), departments in medical schools (n = 17), academic health science centres (n = 23) and associated research institutes (n = 5). In total, 59 strategic plans were subjected to a practice-oriented form of document analysis, informed by the concept of sociotechnical imaginaries. Results On the one hand, digital health is discursively treated as a continuation of the academic medicine vision, with expansions of physician competencies and of research institutes contributions. These imaginaries do not necessarily disrupt the field of academic medicine as currently configured. On the other hand, there is a vision of digital health pursuing a robust sociotechnical future with transformative implications for how care is conducted, what forms of knowledge are prioritized, how patients and patienthood will be understood, and how data work will be distributed. This imaginary may destabilize existing distributions of knowledge and power. Conclusions Looking through the lens of sociotechnical imaginaries, this study illuminates strategic plans as framing desirable futures, directing attention towards specific ways of understanding problems of healthcare, and mobilizing the resources to knit together social and technical systems in ways that bring these visions to fruition. There are bound to be tensions as these sociotechnical imaginaries are translated into material realities. Many of those tensions and their attempted resolutions will have direct implications for the expectations of health professional graduates, the nature of clinical learning environments, and future relationships with patients. Sociology of digital health and science and technology studies can provide useful insights to guide leaders in academic medicine shaping these digital futures.

目的 与其他行业一样,医疗保健行业正日益数字化。我们的研究探讨了学术医学领域如何为这一数字化未来做好准备。方法 我们从加拿大的医学院(14 个)、医学院各系(17 个)、学术健康科学中心(23 个)和相关研究机构(5 个)收集了英文版的积极战略计划。在社会技术想象概念的指导下,共对 59 项战略计划进行了以实践为导向的文件分析。结果 一方面,数字医疗在话语上被视为学术医学愿景的延续,扩大了医生的能力和研究机构的贡献。这些想象并不一定会破坏目前的学术医学领域。另一方面,数字医疗的愿景是追求一个强大的社会技术未来,对如何开展医疗服务、优先考虑哪些知识形式、如何理解病人和病人身份以及如何分配数据工作具有变革性影响。这种想象可能会颠覆现有的知识和权力分配。结论 通过社会技术想象的视角,本研究揭示了战略计划是如何构建理想的未来,如何引导人们关注理解医疗保健问题的具体方式,以及如何调动资源,以实现这些愿景的方式将社会和技术系统结合在一起。当这些社会技术想象转化为物质现实时,必然会产生矛盾。其中的许多矛盾及其试图解决的问题将对卫生专业毕业生的期望、临床学习环境的性质以及未来与病人的关系产生直接影响。数字健康社会学和科技研究可以提供有益的见解,为塑造这些数字未来的学术医学领导者提供指导。
{"title":"Sociotechnical imaginaries in academic medicine strategic planning: a document analysis","authors":"Paula Rowland,&nbsp;Madison Brydges,&nbsp;Kulamakan (Mahan) Kulasegaram","doi":"10.1007/s10459-024-10339-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10459-024-10339-x","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Purpose Along with other industries, healthcare is becoming increasingly digitized. Our study explores how the field of academic medicine is preparing for this digital future. Method Active strategic plans available in English were collected from faculties of medicine in Canada (<i>n</i> = 14), departments in medical schools (<i>n</i> = 17), academic health science centres (<i>n</i> = 23) and associated research institutes (<i>n</i> = 5). In total, 59 strategic plans were subjected to a practice-oriented form of document analysis, informed by the concept of sociotechnical imaginaries. Results On the one hand, digital health is discursively treated as a continuation of the academic medicine vision, with expansions of physician competencies and of research institutes contributions. These imaginaries do not necessarily disrupt the field of academic medicine as currently configured. On the other hand, there is a vision of digital health pursuing a robust sociotechnical future with transformative implications for how care is conducted, what forms of knowledge are prioritized, how patients and patienthood will be understood, and how data work will be distributed. This imaginary may destabilize existing distributions of knowledge and power. Conclusions Looking through the lens of sociotechnical imaginaries, this study illuminates strategic plans as framing desirable futures, directing attention towards specific ways of understanding problems of healthcare, and mobilizing the resources to knit together social and technical systems in ways that bring these visions to fruition. There are bound to be tensions as these sociotechnical imaginaries are translated into material realities. Many of those tensions and their attempted resolutions will have direct implications for the expectations of health professional graduates, the nature of clinical learning environments, and future relationships with patients. Sociology of digital health and science and technology studies can provide useful insights to guide leaders in academic medicine shaping these digital futures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":"29 4","pages":"1435 - 1451"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11369035/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141155395","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Advancing collaboration in health professions education in the general practice domain, developing a national research agenda 推进全科实践领域的卫生专业教育合作,制定国家研究议程。
IF 3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-05-27 DOI: 10.1007/s10459-024-10340-4
Esther de Groot, Marianne Mak-van der Vossen, Irene Slootweg, Meryem Çorum, Anneke Kramer, Jean Muris, Nynke Scherpbier, Bart Thoonen, Roger Damoiseaux

Background

Health professions education (HPE) research in the General Practice domain (GP-HPE) is vital for high-quality healthcare. Collaboration among GP-HPE researchers is crucial but challenging. Formulating a research agenda, involving stakeholders, and fostering inter-institutional collaboration can address these challenges and connect educational research and practice.

Methods

We used Q-methodology to explore perspectives on GP-HPE research of participants from all Dutch postgraduate GP training institutes. Participants individually sorted statements based on the relevance of future GP-HPE research for educational practice. Data analysis comprised inverted factor analysis, rotation, and qualitative interpretation of configurations of all statements. The National Meeting on Educational Research took a participatory approach.

Results

We included 73 participants with diverse involvement in GP-HPE research. We identified five distinct perspectives, each representing a research focus area for developing and innovating GP education: the clinician scientist, the socially engaged GP, the specific GP identity, the GP as an entrepreneur, and the GP engaged in lifelong learning.

Discussion

The resulting five perspectives align with General Practice hallmarks. Q-methodology and a participatory approach facilitated collaboration among stakeholders. Successful inter-institutional collaboration requires a common goal, neutral leadership, participant commitment, regular meetings, audit trail support, process transparency, and reflexivity. Future research should address evidence gaps within these perspectives.

Conclusion

Using Q-methodology turned out to be valuable for compiling a national research agenda for GP-HPE research. The research process helped to cross boundaries between researchers in different institutions, thus putting inter-institutional collaborative advantage center stage. Our approach could provide a conceivable procedure for HPE researchers worldwide.

背景:全科领域的健康职业教育(HPE)研究对于高质量的医疗保健至关重要。GP-HPE 研究人员之间的合作至关重要,但也极具挑战性。制定研究议程、让利益相关者参与进来以及促进机构间合作可以应对这些挑战,并将教育研究与实践联系起来:我们使用 Q 方法探讨了荷兰所有全科医生研究生培训机构的参与者对 GP-HPE 研究的看法。参与者根据未来 GP-HPE 研究与教育实践的相关性对陈述进行单独排序。数据分析包括倒置因子分析、旋转和对所有陈述配置的定性分析。全国教育研究会议采用了参与式方法:我们邀请了 73 位参与 GP-HPE 研究的不同参与者。我们确定了五个不同的视角,每个视角都代表了发展和创新全科医生教育的一个研究重点领域:临床科学家、全科医生的社会参与、全科医生的特定身份、全科医生作为企业家以及全科医生的终身学习:讨论:由此产生的五个视角符合全科医生的特点。Q 方法和参与式方法促进了利益相关者之间的合作。成功的机构间合作需要共同的目标、中立的领导、参与者的承诺、定期会议、审计跟踪支持、过程透明度和反思性。未来的研究应解决这些方面的证据差距:使用 Q 方法对于编制 GP-HPE 研究的国家研究议程很有价值。研究过程有助于跨越不同机构研究人员之间的界限,从而将机构间的合作优势置于中心位置。我们的方法可以为全世界的 HPE 研究人员提供一个可想象的程序。
{"title":"Advancing collaboration in health professions education in the general practice domain, developing a national research agenda","authors":"Esther de Groot,&nbsp;Marianne Mak-van der Vossen,&nbsp;Irene Slootweg,&nbsp;Meryem Çorum,&nbsp;Anneke Kramer,&nbsp;Jean Muris,&nbsp;Nynke Scherpbier,&nbsp;Bart Thoonen,&nbsp;Roger Damoiseaux","doi":"10.1007/s10459-024-10340-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10459-024-10340-4","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Health professions education (HPE) research in the General Practice domain (GP-HPE) is vital for high-quality healthcare. Collaboration among GP-HPE researchers is crucial but challenging. Formulating a research agenda, involving stakeholders, and fostering inter-institutional collaboration can address these challenges and connect educational research and practice.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used Q-methodology to explore perspectives on GP-HPE research of participants from all Dutch postgraduate GP training institutes. Participants individually sorted statements based on the relevance of future GP-HPE research for educational practice. Data analysis comprised inverted factor analysis, rotation, and qualitative interpretation of configurations of all statements. The National Meeting on Educational Research took a participatory approach.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 73 participants with diverse involvement in GP-HPE research. We identified five distinct perspectives, each representing a research focus area for developing and innovating GP education: the clinician scientist, the socially engaged GP, the specific GP identity, the GP as an entrepreneur, and the GP engaged in lifelong learning.</p><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The resulting five perspectives align with General Practice hallmarks. Q-methodology and a participatory approach facilitated collaboration among stakeholders. Successful inter-institutional collaboration requires a common goal, neutral leadership, participant commitment, regular meetings, audit trail support, process transparency, and reflexivity. Future research should address evidence gaps within these perspectives.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Using Q-methodology turned out to be valuable for compiling a national research agenda for GP-HPE research. The research process helped to cross boundaries between researchers in different institutions, thus putting inter-institutional collaborative advantage center stage. Our approach could provide a conceivable procedure for HPE researchers worldwide.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":"29 4","pages":"1417 - 1434"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11369045/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141155377","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From admissions to licensure: education data associations from a multi-centre undergraduate medical education collaboration 从入学到取得执照:多中心本科医学教育合作的教育数据关联。
IF 3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI: 10.1007/s10459-024-10326-2
S. Chahine, I. Bartman, K. Kulasegaram, D Archibald, P. Wang, C. Wilson, B. Ross, E. Cameron, J. Hogenbirk, C. Barber, R. Burgess, E. Katsoulas, C. Touchie, L Grierson

This paper reports the findings of a Canada based multi-institutional study designed to investigate the relationships between admissions criteria, in-program assessments, and performance on licensing exams. The study’s objective is to provide valuable insights for improving educational practices across different institutions. Data were gathered from six medical schools: McMaster University, the Northern Ontario School of Medicine University, Queen’s University, University of Ottawa, University of Toronto, and Western University. The dataset includes graduates who undertook the Medical Council of Canada Qualifying Examination Part 1 (MCCQE1) between 2015 and 2017. The data were categorized into five distinct sections: demographic information as well as four matrices: admissions, course performance, objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), and clerkship performance. Common and unique variables were identified through an extensive consensus-building process. Hierarchical linear regression and a manual stepwise variable selection approach were used for analysis. Analyses were performed on data set encompassing graduates of all six medical schools as well as on individual data sets from each school. For the combined data set the final model estimated 32% of the variance in performance on licensing exams, highlighting variables such as Age at Admission, Sex, Biomedical Knowledge, the first post-clerkship OSCE, and a clerkship theta score. Individual school analysis explained 41–60% of the variance in MCCQE1 outcomes, with comparable variables to the analysis from of the combined data set identified as significant independent variables. Therefore, strongly emphasising the need for variety of high-quality assessment on the educational continuum. This study underscores the importance of sharing data to enable educational insights. This study also had its challenges when it came to the access and aggregation of data. As such we advocate for the establishment of a common framework for multi-institutional educational research, facilitating studies and evaluations across diverse institutions. This study demonstrates the scientific potential of collaborative data analysis in enhancing educational outcomes. It offers a deeper understanding of the factors influencing performance on licensure exams and emphasizes the need for addressing data gaps to advance multi-institutional research for educational improvements.

本文报告了一项基于加拿大的多机构研究的结果,该研究旨在调查录取标准、课程内评估和执业资格考试成绩之间的关系。该研究的目的是为改进不同院校的教育实践提供有价值的见解。数据来自六所医学院:麦克马斯特大学、北安大略医学院大学、皇后大学、渥太华大学、多伦多大学和西部大学。数据集包括 2015 年至 2017 年期间参加加拿大医学委员会资格考试第一部分(MCCQE1)的毕业生。数据分为五个不同的部分:人口统计学信息以及四个矩阵:录取、课程成绩、客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)和实习成绩。通过广泛的建立共识过程,确定了共同和独特的变量。分析中使用了层次线性回归和人工逐步选择变量的方法。对包括所有六所医学院毕业生的数据集以及每所医学院的单个数据集进行了分析。对于综合数据集,最终模型估计了执业医师资格考试成绩差异的 32%,突出了入学年龄、性别、生物医学知识、实习后第一次 OSCE 和实习 theta 分数等变量。对单个学校的分析解释了 MCCQE1 结果中 41-60% 的差异,与合并数据集的分析结果相当的变量被确定为重要的自变量。因此,这有力地强调了在教育连续体中进行各种高质量评估的必要性。这项研究强调了共享数据对提高教育洞察力的重要性。这项研究在数据的获取和汇总方面也遇到了挑战。因此,我们主张为多机构教育研究建立一个共同框架,促进不同机构之间的研究和评估。本研究展示了合作数据分析在提高教育成果方面的科学潜力。它让我们对影响执业资格考试成绩的因素有了更深入的了解,并强调了解决数据缺口的必要性,以推进多机构研究,改善教育。
{"title":"From admissions to licensure: education data associations from a multi-centre undergraduate medical education collaboration","authors":"S. Chahine,&nbsp;I. Bartman,&nbsp;K. Kulasegaram,&nbsp;D Archibald,&nbsp;P. Wang,&nbsp;C. Wilson,&nbsp;B. Ross,&nbsp;E. Cameron,&nbsp;J. Hogenbirk,&nbsp;C. Barber,&nbsp;R. Burgess,&nbsp;E. Katsoulas,&nbsp;C. Touchie,&nbsp;L Grierson","doi":"10.1007/s10459-024-10326-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10459-024-10326-2","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper reports the findings of a Canada based multi-institutional study designed to investigate the relationships between admissions criteria, in-program assessments, and performance on licensing exams. The study’s objective is to provide valuable insights for improving educational practices across different institutions. Data were gathered from six medical schools: McMaster University, the Northern Ontario School of Medicine University, Queen’s University, University of Ottawa, University of Toronto, and Western University. The dataset includes graduates who undertook the Medical Council of Canada Qualifying Examination Part 1 (MCCQE1) between 2015 and 2017. The data were categorized into five distinct sections: demographic information as well as four matrices: admissions, course performance, objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), and clerkship performance. Common and unique variables were identified through an extensive consensus-building process. Hierarchical linear regression and a manual stepwise variable selection approach were used for analysis. Analyses were performed on data set encompassing graduates of all six medical schools as well as on individual data sets from each school. For the combined data set the final model estimated 32% of the variance in performance on licensing exams, highlighting variables such as Age at Admission, Sex, Biomedical Knowledge, the first post-clerkship OSCE, and a clerkship theta score. Individual school analysis explained 41–60% of the variance in MCCQE1 outcomes, with comparable variables to the analysis from of the combined data set identified as significant independent variables. Therefore, strongly emphasising the need for variety of high-quality assessment on the educational continuum. This study underscores the importance of sharing data to enable educational insights. This study also had its challenges when it came to the access and aggregation of data. As such we advocate for the establishment of a common framework for multi-institutional educational research, facilitating studies and evaluations across diverse institutions. This study demonstrates the scientific potential of collaborative data analysis in enhancing educational outcomes. It offers a deeper understanding of the factors influencing performance on licensure exams and emphasizes the need for addressing data gaps to advance multi-institutional research for educational improvements.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":"29 4","pages":"1393 - 1415"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141081912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Basic science knowledge underlies clinical science knowledge and clinical problem solving: evidence from veterinary medicine. 基础科学知识是临床科学知识和临床问题解决的基础:来自兽医学的证据。
IF 4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-05-16 DOI: 10.1007/s10459-024-10334-2
Jared A Danielson, Rebecca G Burzette, Misty R Bailey, Linda M Berent, Heather Case, Anita Casey-Reed, John Dascanio, Richard A Feinberg, Tamara S Hancock, Claudia A Kirk

Medical sciences education emphasizes basic science learning as a prerequisite to clinical learning. Studies exploring relationships between achievement in the basic sciences and subsequent achievement in the clinical sciences generally suggest a significant positive relationship. Basic science knowledge and clinical experience are theorized to combine to form encapsulated knowledge- a dynamic mix of information that is useful for solving clinical problems. This study explores the relationship between basic science knowledge (BSK), clinical science knowledge (CSK), and clinical problem-solving ability, as measured within the context of four veterinary colleges using both college-specific measures and professionally validated, standardized measures of basic and clinical science knowledge and problem-solving ability. Significant correlations existed among all variables. Structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis were used to produce models showing that newly acquired BSK directly and significantly predicted BSK retained over time and newly acquired CSK, as well as indirectly predicted clinical problem-solving ability (mediated by newly acquired CSK and BSK retained over time). These findings likely suggest a gradual development of schema (encapsulated knowledge) and not an isolated development of biomedical versus clinical knowledge over time. A broader implication of these results is that explicitly teaching basic science knowledge positively and durably affects subsequent clinical knowledge and problem-solving ability independent of instructional strategy or curricular approach. Furthermore, for veterinary colleges specifically, student performance as measured by both course-level and standardized tests are likely to prove useful for predicting subsequent academic achievement in classroom and clinical settings, licensing examination performance, and/or for identifying students likely in need of remediation in clinical knowledge.

医学教育强调基础科学学习是临床学习的前提。探讨基础科学成绩与后续临床科学成绩之间关系的研究普遍表明,两者之间存在显著的正相关关系。理论上,基础科学知识与临床经验相结合,形成了封装知识--一种有助于解决临床问题的动态信息组合。本研究探讨了基础科学知识(BSK)、临床科学知识(CSK)和临床问题解决能力之间的关系,在四所兽医学院的背景下,使用学院特定的测量方法和经过专业验证的基础与临床科学知识和问题解决能力的标准化测量方法进行测量。所有变量之间都存在明显的相关性。通过结构方程建模和确认性因子分析建立的模型显示,新获得的 BSK 可以直接并显著地预测随着时间推移而保留的 BSK 和新获得的 CSK,还可以间接地预测临床问题解决能力(通过新获得的 CSK 和随着时间推移而保留的 BSK 进行中介)。这些发现可能表明,随着时间的推移,图式(封装知识)会逐渐发展,而不是生物医学知识相对于临床知识的孤立发展。这些结果的一个更广泛的含义是,明确教授基础科学知识会对后续临床知识和解决问题的能力产生积极而持久的影响,而与教学策略或课程方法无关。此外,具体到兽医学院,通过课程水平测试和标准化测试衡量的学生成绩很可能被证明有助于预测学生在课堂和临床环境中的后续学业成绩、执业资格考试成绩,以及/或识别可能需要补习临床知识的学生。
{"title":"Basic science knowledge underlies clinical science knowledge and clinical problem solving: evidence from veterinary medicine.","authors":"Jared A Danielson, Rebecca G Burzette, Misty R Bailey, Linda M Berent, Heather Case, Anita Casey-Reed, John Dascanio, Richard A Feinberg, Tamara S Hancock, Claudia A Kirk","doi":"10.1007/s10459-024-10334-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-024-10334-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medical sciences education emphasizes basic science learning as a prerequisite to clinical learning. Studies exploring relationships between achievement in the basic sciences and subsequent achievement in the clinical sciences generally suggest a significant positive relationship. Basic science knowledge and clinical experience are theorized to combine to form encapsulated knowledge- a dynamic mix of information that is useful for solving clinical problems. This study explores the relationship between basic science knowledge (BSK), clinical science knowledge (CSK), and clinical problem-solving ability, as measured within the context of four veterinary colleges using both college-specific measures and professionally validated, standardized measures of basic and clinical science knowledge and problem-solving ability. Significant correlations existed among all variables. Structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis were used to produce models showing that newly acquired BSK directly and significantly predicted BSK retained over time and newly acquired CSK, as well as indirectly predicted clinical problem-solving ability (mediated by newly acquired CSK and BSK retained over time). These findings likely suggest a gradual development of schema (encapsulated knowledge) and not an isolated development of biomedical versus clinical knowledge over time. A broader implication of these results is that explicitly teaching basic science knowledge positively and durably affects subsequent clinical knowledge and problem-solving ability independent of instructional strategy or curricular approach. Furthermore, for veterinary colleges specifically, student performance as measured by both course-level and standardized tests are likely to prove useful for predicting subsequent academic achievement in classroom and clinical settings, licensing examination performance, and/or for identifying students likely in need of remediation in clinical knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140946416","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How the knowledge shared using social media is taken up into health professions education practice: A qualitative descriptive study. 如何在卫生专业教育实践中利用社交媒体分享知识:定性描述研究。
IF 4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-05-16 DOI: 10.1007/s10459-024-10338-y
Catherine M Giroux, Sungha Kim, Aliki Thomas

Social media may promote knowledge sharing but what users do with the new knowledge and how it may influence practice remains to be known. This exploratory study used a social constructivist lens to understand how health professions educators and researchers integrate knowledge from social media into their respective practices. We purposively sampled health professions educators and researchers using the hashtags #MedEd, #HPE, and #HealthProfessionsEducation on Twitter/X. We obtained informed consent, conducted interviews via videoconference, and engaged in multiple cycles of deductive and inductive coding and analysis. Participants identified as educators and researchers (n = 12), as researchers (n = 1), or as educators (n = 1) from Canada (n = 8), the United States (n = 3), and Switzerland, Ireland, and China (n = 1, respectively). Eight participants actively used social media (i.e., creating/posting original content); six participants indicated passive use (i.e., reading/retweeting content). They discussed the importance of crafting a consumable message and social media identity to streamline the content shared. Social media's accessible, non-hierarchical nature may facilitate knowledge-sharing, whereas the potential spread of misinformation and technological requirements (e.g., internet access, country-specific restrictions on platforms) present barriers to uptake. Participants described using knowledge gained from social media as teaching tools, new research methodologies, new theoretical frameworks, and low-risk clinical interventions. Previous research has demonstrated how social media has empirically been used for diffusion or dissemination rather than as an active process of evidence uptake. Using knowledge translation frameworks, like the Knowledge to Action or Theoretical Domains frameworks, to inform social media-based knowledge sharing activities in health professions education is recommended.

社交媒体可以促进知识共享,但用户如何利用新知识以及新知识如何影响实践仍是未知数。本探索性研究采用社会建构主义视角,以了解卫生专业教育工作者和研究人员如何将社交媒体上的知识整合到各自的实践中。我们有目的地在 Twitter/X 上使用 #MedEd、#HPE 和 #HealthProfessionsEducation 标签对卫生专业教育工作者和研究人员进行了抽样调查。我们获得了知情同意,通过视频会议进行了访谈,并进行了多个循环的演绎和归纳编码与分析。参与者分别来自加拿大(8 人)、美国(3 人)、瑞士、爱尔兰和中国(1 人),他们的身份是教育工作者和研究人员(12 人)、研究人员(1 人)或教育工作者(1 人)。八名参与者积极使用社交媒体(即创建/发布原创内容);六名参与者表示被动使用(即阅读/转发内容)。他们讨论了制作可消费信息和社交媒体身份以简化分享内容的重要性。社交媒体的可访问性和无等级性可能会促进知识共享,而错误信息的潜在传播和技术要求(如互联网接入、特定国家对平台的限制)则会阻碍知识共享。与会者介绍了如何将从社交媒体获得的知识用作教学工具、新的研究方法、新的理论框架和低风险临床干预措施。以往的研究表明,社交媒体在经验上被用于扩散或传播,而不是作为一个积极的证据吸收过程。建议使用知识转化框架(如 "从知识到行动 "或 "理论领域 "框架)来指导卫生专业教育中基于社交媒体的知识共享活动。
{"title":"How the knowledge shared using social media is taken up into health professions education practice: A qualitative descriptive study.","authors":"Catherine M Giroux, Sungha Kim, Aliki Thomas","doi":"10.1007/s10459-024-10338-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-024-10338-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social media may promote knowledge sharing but what users do with the new knowledge and how it may influence practice remains to be known. This exploratory study used a social constructivist lens to understand how health professions educators and researchers integrate knowledge from social media into their respective practices. We purposively sampled health professions educators and researchers using the hashtags #MedEd, #HPE, and #HealthProfessionsEducation on Twitter/X. We obtained informed consent, conducted interviews via videoconference, and engaged in multiple cycles of deductive and inductive coding and analysis. Participants identified as educators and researchers (n = 12), as researchers (n = 1), or as educators (n = 1) from Canada (n = 8), the United States (n = 3), and Switzerland, Ireland, and China (n = 1, respectively). Eight participants actively used social media (i.e., creating/posting original content); six participants indicated passive use (i.e., reading/retweeting content). They discussed the importance of crafting a consumable message and social media identity to streamline the content shared. Social media's accessible, non-hierarchical nature may facilitate knowledge-sharing, whereas the potential spread of misinformation and technological requirements (e.g., internet access, country-specific restrictions on platforms) present barriers to uptake. Participants described using knowledge gained from social media as teaching tools, new research methodologies, new theoretical frameworks, and low-risk clinical interventions. Previous research has demonstrated how social media has empirically been used for diffusion or dissemination rather than as an active process of evidence uptake. Using knowledge translation frameworks, like the Knowledge to Action or Theoretical Domains frameworks, to inform social media-based knowledge sharing activities in health professions education is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140946418","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Anti-oppression pedagogy in health professions: a scoping review. 卫生专业中的反压迫教学法:范围界定审查。
IF 4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-05-13 DOI: 10.1007/s10459-024-10336-0
Meredith Smith, Tricia McGuire-Adams, Kaylee Eady

Health professional learners are increasingly called to learn about health inequity to reduce inequities and improve patient care and health outcomes. Anti-oppression pedagogy (AOP) addresses the need for health professional learners to understand multiple health inequities and the structures and systems that produce inequities. However, the inclusion of AOP in health professions education varies and there is a lack of clarity in its conceptualization and integration. A scoping review was conducted to address this gap and to understand how AOP is conceptualized and integrated in health professions education. Thirty-six articles met the inclusion criteria. The articles demonstrated that AOP is not commonly utilized terminology within health professions education. When AOP is integrated, it is not consistently conceptualized but is generally viewed as a broad concept that focuses on antiracism; decoloniality; intersectionality; and supporting learners to understand, critically reflect on, and act against structural and systemic forms of oppressions. In addition, there is variation in the integration of AOP in health professions education with the most common methods consisting of discussions, cases, reflection, learning through lived experiences, and the incorporation of humanities within a longitudinal curriculum. The results of this scoping review highlight the need for health professions education to develop one clear concept that educators use when teaching about anti-oppression, which may reduce working in silos and allow educators to better collaborate with each other in advancing this work. In addition, this review suggests that health professional programs should consider incorporating AOP in curricula with a broad and longitudinal approach utilizing the common methods of delivery. To better support programs in including AOP in curricula, further research is required to emphasize the benefits, provide clarity on its conceptualization, and determine the most effective methods of integration.

健康专业学习者越来越需要了解健康不公平问题,以减少不公平现象,改善患者护理和健康结果。反压迫教学法(AOP)满足了卫生专业学习者了解多种卫生不平等以及产生不平等的结构和系统的需要。然而,将 AOP 纳入卫生专业教育的情况各不相同,其概念化和整合也不够清晰。为了弥补这一不足,了解如何将 AOP 概念化并纳入卫生专业教育,我们进行了一次范围审查。有 36 篇文章符合纳入标准。这些文章表明,AOP 并不是卫生专业教育中常用的术语。当 AOP 被纳入时,其概念并不一致,但通常被视为一个广泛的概念,侧重于反种族主义、非殖民主义、交叉性,以及支持学习者理解、批判性反思和采取行动反对结构性和系统性的压迫形式。此外,将 AOP 纳入卫生专业教育的方法也不尽相同,最常见的方法包括讨论、案例、反思、通过生活经验学习,以及将人文学科纳入纵向课程。本次范围界定审查的结果突出表明,卫生专业教育需要制定一个明确的概念,供教育工作者在讲授反压迫时使用,这样可以减少各自为政的情况,使教育工作者能够更好地相互合作,推进这项工作。此外,本综述还建议,健康专业课程应考虑将反压迫教育纳入课程中,采用广泛而纵向的方法,利用常见的授课方式。为了更好地支持各项目将 AOP 纳入课程,需要进一步开展研究,强调其益处,明确其概念,并确定最有效的整合方法。
{"title":"Anti-oppression pedagogy in health professions: a scoping review.","authors":"Meredith Smith, Tricia McGuire-Adams, Kaylee Eady","doi":"10.1007/s10459-024-10336-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-024-10336-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health professional learners are increasingly called to learn about health inequity to reduce inequities and improve patient care and health outcomes. Anti-oppression pedagogy (AOP) addresses the need for health professional learners to understand multiple health inequities and the structures and systems that produce inequities. However, the inclusion of AOP in health professions education varies and there is a lack of clarity in its conceptualization and integration. A scoping review was conducted to address this gap and to understand how AOP is conceptualized and integrated in health professions education. Thirty-six articles met the inclusion criteria. The articles demonstrated that AOP is not commonly utilized terminology within health professions education. When AOP is integrated, it is not consistently conceptualized but is generally viewed as a broad concept that focuses on antiracism; decoloniality; intersectionality; and supporting learners to understand, critically reflect on, and act against structural and systemic forms of oppressions. In addition, there is variation in the integration of AOP in health professions education with the most common methods consisting of discussions, cases, reflection, learning through lived experiences, and the incorporation of humanities within a longitudinal curriculum. The results of this scoping review highlight the need for health professions education to develop one clear concept that educators use when teaching about anti-oppression, which may reduce working in silos and allow educators to better collaborate with each other in advancing this work. In addition, this review suggests that health professional programs should consider incorporating AOP in curricula with a broad and longitudinal approach utilizing the common methods of delivery. To better support programs in including AOP in curricula, further research is required to emphasize the benefits, provide clarity on its conceptualization, and determine the most effective methods of integration.</p>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140917329","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An "integration" of professional identity formation among rural physicians experiencing an interplay between their professional and personal identities. 乡村医生职业身份形成的 "整合",经历了职业身份与个人身份之间的相互作用。
IF 4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-05-13 DOI: 10.1007/s10459-024-10337-z
Junichiro Miyachi, Miho Iwakuma, Hiroshi Nishigori

The present understanding of professional identity formation is problematic since it underrepresents minority physicians and potentially excludes their professional identity formation experiences. Rural physicians are expected to have similar underrepresented aspects as minority physicians because of their specific sociocultural contexts and consequent private-professional intersection, which lead to ethical complexities. Therefore, to bridge this research gap, we interviewed 12 early- to mid-career Japanese physicians working in rural areas and explored their experiences. Through a narrative analysis guided by Figured Worlds theory, we analysed the data by focusing on the vocabulary, expressions, and metaphors participants used to describe their experiences. A central theme emerged concerning how the rural physicians configurated their personal versus professional participation in their local communities. Further, their identity narratives varied regarding how they constructed their identities, rural communities, and relationships as well as their identity formation ideals and strategies to achieve them. Informed by 'Big Questions' concerning worldview framework, we delineated four identity narratives as prototypes to describe how they participated in their communities. These identity narratives provide a preliminary understanding of how diverse identity formation is for rural physicians. In addition, our findings exposed the current professional identity formation framework as potentially biased towards single forms of participation in monolithic communities, overlooking complicated forms of participation in multiple communities. We argue that applying frameworks and concepts to capture these multiple forms of participation as well as revisiting the 'discourse of integration' are necessary steps to overcome the limitation of the current understanding of professional identity formation.

目前对专业身份形成的理解是有问题的,因为它对少数民族医生的代表不足,并有可能将他们的专业身份形成经历排除在外。由于其特定的社会文化背景以及由此产生的私人-职业交叉,乡村医生预计会与少数民族医生有类似的代表性不足的方面,从而导致伦理问题的复杂性。因此,为了弥补这一研究空白,我们采访了 12 名在农村地区工作的早中期日本医生,并探讨了他们的经历。通过以 "形象世界 "理论为指导的叙事分析,我们重点分析了参与者在描述其经历时使用的词汇、表达方式和隐喻。我们发现了一个中心主题,即乡村医生如何配置他们在当地社区的个人参与和专业参与。此外,他们的身份叙述也各不相同,涉及他们如何构建自己的身份、农村社区和人际关系,以及他们的身份形成理想和实现理想的策略。根据有关世界观框架的 "大问题",我们划分了四种身份叙事原型,以描述他们如何参与社区活动。这些身份叙事让我们初步了解了乡村医生身份形成的多样性。此外,我们的研究结果表明,当前的职业身份形成框架可能偏重于单一社区的单一参与形式,而忽视了多个社区的复杂参与形式。我们认为,应用框架和概念来捕捉这些多种形式的参与以及重新审视 "融合话语 "是克服当前对职业身份形成理解的局限性的必要步骤。
{"title":"An \"integration\" of professional identity formation among rural physicians experiencing an interplay between their professional and personal identities.","authors":"Junichiro Miyachi, Miho Iwakuma, Hiroshi Nishigori","doi":"10.1007/s10459-024-10337-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-024-10337-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present understanding of professional identity formation is problematic since it underrepresents minority physicians and potentially excludes their professional identity formation experiences. Rural physicians are expected to have similar underrepresented aspects as minority physicians because of their specific sociocultural contexts and consequent private-professional intersection, which lead to ethical complexities. Therefore, to bridge this research gap, we interviewed 12 early- to mid-career Japanese physicians working in rural areas and explored their experiences. Through a narrative analysis guided by Figured Worlds theory, we analysed the data by focusing on the vocabulary, expressions, and metaphors participants used to describe their experiences. A central theme emerged concerning how the rural physicians configurated their personal versus professional participation in their local communities. Further, their identity narratives varied regarding how they constructed their identities, rural communities, and relationships as well as their identity formation ideals and strategies to achieve them. Informed by 'Big Questions' concerning worldview framework, we delineated four identity narratives as prototypes to describe how they participated in their communities. These identity narratives provide a preliminary understanding of how diverse identity formation is for rural physicians. In addition, our findings exposed the current professional identity formation framework as potentially biased towards single forms of participation in monolithic communities, overlooking complicated forms of participation in multiple communities. We argue that applying frameworks and concepts to capture these multiple forms of participation as well as revisiting the 'discourse of integration' are necessary steps to overcome the limitation of the current understanding of professional identity formation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140917328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Historicity and the impossible present 历史性与不可能的现在
IF 3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-04-29 DOI: 10.1007/s10459-024-10330-6
Rachel H. Ellaway

In this editorial the editor considers issues of historicity (understanding things in their historical context) in health professions education and the sciences thereof, and argues for more attention to historical and other contextual factors in creating and appraising the research literature.

在这篇社论中,编者探讨了卫生专业教育及其科学中的历史性(在历史背景下理解事物)问题,并主张在创建和评估研究文献时更多地关注历史和其他背景因素。
{"title":"Historicity and the impossible present","authors":"Rachel H. Ellaway","doi":"10.1007/s10459-024-10330-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10459-024-10330-6","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this editorial the editor considers issues of historicity (understanding things in their historical context) in health professions education and the sciences thereof, and argues for more attention to historical and other contextual factors in creating and appraising the research literature.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":"29 2","pages":"361 - 365"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140870330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Advances in Health Sciences Education
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1