Pub Date : 2024-09-16DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.09.005
Carlos A Valdes, Ahmet Bilgili, Griffin Stinson, Ramy M Sharaf, Omar M Sharaf, Zachary Brennan, Fabian Jimenez-Contreras, Giles J Peek, Mark S Bleiweis, Thomas M Beaver, Jeffrey Phillip Jacobs
Background: Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) annual meetings provide opportunities to disseminate cardiothoracic research. We assessed rates of publication of STS abstracts as manuscripts in peer-reviewed journals over five years and determined factors associated with successful publication.
Methods: The STS "Annual Meeting Archive" was searched online for abstract books from STS annual meetings from 2015-2019. Abstract books were reviewed for information about presented abstracts. A PubMed and Google search was then performed to identify corresponding peer-reviewed journal publications.
Results: A total of 1451 abstracts were presented at STS annual meetings from 2015-2019. Overall publication rate of accepted abstracts as manuscripts in peer-reviewed journals was 1097/1451=75.60%. Most published manuscripts were published in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery (750/1097=68.37%). Median duration between abstract presentation and peer-reviewed journal publication was 313[IQR=212.5-458] days. Only 29/1451=2.00% of abstracts won an award, and all 29 of these award-winning abstracts were published as a manuscript. Oral presentation was associated with increased odds of publication compared to poster presentation (OR=1.28[95% CI=1.04-1.71], p=0.021). Median 5-year impact factor of peer-reviewed journals containing these manuscripts was 5.04[IQR=5.04-5.04], and corresponding manuscripts were cited a median of 4[IQR=1-9] times. Overall, 836/1097=76.20% of manuscripts published in peer-reviewed scientific journals had a corresponding North American author.
Conclusions: Annual STS meetings are a forum for the presentation of high-quality research. The rate of publication of accepted STS abstracts as manuscripts in peer-reviewed journals is >75%, comparing favorably with national meetings of other surgical societies, and >2/3 of published manuscripts are published in STS's official journal.
{"title":"Fate of Abstracts Presented at Annual Meetings of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons from 2015 to 2019.","authors":"Carlos A Valdes, Ahmet Bilgili, Griffin Stinson, Ramy M Sharaf, Omar M Sharaf, Zachary Brennan, Fabian Jimenez-Contreras, Giles J Peek, Mark S Bleiweis, Thomas M Beaver, Jeffrey Phillip Jacobs","doi":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.09.005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.09.005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) annual meetings provide opportunities to disseminate cardiothoracic research. We assessed rates of publication of STS abstracts as manuscripts in peer-reviewed journals over five years and determined factors associated with successful publication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The STS \"Annual Meeting Archive\" was searched online for abstract books from STS annual meetings from 2015-2019. Abstract books were reviewed for information about presented abstracts. A PubMed and Google search was then performed to identify corresponding peer-reviewed journal publications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1451 abstracts were presented at STS annual meetings from 2015-2019. Overall publication rate of accepted abstracts as manuscripts in peer-reviewed journals was 1097/1451=75.60%. Most published manuscripts were published in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery (750/1097=68.37%). Median duration between abstract presentation and peer-reviewed journal publication was 313[IQR=212.5-458] days. Only 29/1451=2.00% of abstracts won an award, and all 29 of these award-winning abstracts were published as a manuscript. Oral presentation was associated with increased odds of publication compared to poster presentation (OR=1.28[95% CI=1.04-1.71], p=0.021). Median 5-year impact factor of peer-reviewed journals containing these manuscripts was 5.04[IQR=5.04-5.04], and corresponding manuscripts were cited a median of 4[IQR=1-9] times. Overall, 836/1097=76.20% of manuscripts published in peer-reviewed scientific journals had a corresponding North American author.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Annual STS meetings are a forum for the presentation of high-quality research. The rate of publication of accepted STS abstracts as manuscripts in peer-reviewed journals is >75%, comparing favorably with national meetings of other surgical societies, and >2/3 of published manuscripts are published in STS's official journal.</p>","PeriodicalId":50976,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-16DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.09.007
Bradley G Leshnower, Woodrow J Farrington, Lauren V Huckaby, William B Keeling, Alysa B Zellner, Edward P Chen
Background: Valve preservation in acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) can be accomplished with root repair or replacement. Long-term valve durability with root repair has been established, but limited data exist regarding long-term durability of valve-sparing root replacement (VSRR). In this study, long-term results of VSRR were compared with root repair in ATAAD.
Methods: From 2005 to 2023, 866 patients underwent ATAAD repair, of which 675 underwent root repair and 191 underwent root replacement (VSRR, n = 65; Bentall, n =126). VSRR patients were compared with 123 patients who underwent valve resuspension and root repair with postoperative echocardiograms ≥1 year.
Results: VSRR patients were younger (VSRR, 44 ± 11 years vs root repair, 55 ± 13 years; P < .001). Preoperatively, 57% of VSRR and 35% of root repair patients had moderate or more aortic insufficiency. Cardiopulmonary bypass and myocardial ischemia times were significantly longer in VSRR (P < .001). Postoperative echocardiograms with ≥1 year follow-up were analyzed in 58 VSRR patients with median follow-up of 4.8 years (interquartile range, 3-12 years) and in 123 root repair patients with median follow-up of 3.6 years (interquartile range, 3-8 years). At 10 years, VSRR patients had superior freedom from more than mild aortic insufficiency (VSRR, 91% vs root repair, 49%; P < .001). At 10 years, freedom from aortic valve replacement was equivalent (VSRR, 98% vs root repair, 92%; P = .269).
Conclusions: VSRR provides equivalent long-term valve durability as root repair in ATAAD, even in patients with moderate or severe aortic insufficiency. In select young patients who require root replacement during ATAAD repair, VSRR represents an ideal therapy.
{"title":"Long-term Results of Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.","authors":"Bradley G Leshnower, Woodrow J Farrington, Lauren V Huckaby, William B Keeling, Alysa B Zellner, Edward P Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.09.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.09.007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Valve preservation in acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) can be accomplished with root repair or replacement. Long-term valve durability with root repair has been established, but limited data exist regarding long-term durability of valve-sparing root replacement (VSRR). In this study, long-term results of VSRR were compared with root repair in ATAAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 2005 to 2023, 866 patients underwent ATAAD repair, of which 675 underwent root repair and 191 underwent root replacement (VSRR, n = 65; Bentall, n =126). VSRR patients were compared with 123 patients who underwent valve resuspension and root repair with postoperative echocardiograms ≥1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VSRR patients were younger (VSRR, 44 ± 11 years vs root repair, 55 ± 13 years; P < .001). Preoperatively, 57% of VSRR and 35% of root repair patients had moderate or more aortic insufficiency. Cardiopulmonary bypass and myocardial ischemia times were significantly longer in VSRR (P < .001). Postoperative echocardiograms with ≥1 year follow-up were analyzed in 58 VSRR patients with median follow-up of 4.8 years (interquartile range, 3-12 years) and in 123 root repair patients with median follow-up of 3.6 years (interquartile range, 3-8 years). At 10 years, VSRR patients had superior freedom from more than mild aortic insufficiency (VSRR, 91% vs root repair, 49%; P < .001). At 10 years, freedom from aortic valve replacement was equivalent (VSRR, 98% vs root repair, 92%; P = .269).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VSRR provides equivalent long-term valve durability as root repair in ATAAD, even in patients with moderate or severe aortic insufficiency. In select young patients who require root replacement during ATAAD repair, VSRR represents an ideal therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50976,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300215","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-12DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.09.002
Mario O'Connor, Andrew Well, Arnold Fenrich, Neil M Venardos, Daniel Shmorhun, Carlos M Mery, Charles D Fraser
Background: Iatrogenic complete atrioventricular block (ICAVB) has long been noted as a major complication after congenital heart surgery (CHS), and it contributes to complex postoperative care and potentially affects patients' outcomes.
Methods: This study is a retrospective review of the Pediatric Health Information System database from January 1, 2004 to September 30, 2023. All patients who underwent The Society of Thoracic Surgeons benchmark procedures were included. International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9th and 10th editions were used to identify diagnoses and procedures. All patients with a diagnosis of complete atrioventricular block and placement of a permanent pacemaker after CHS but in the same hospitalization were identified as having ICAVB.
Results: A total of 42,332 patients were identified, with 17,106 (41%) female and 23,042 (55%) non-Hispanic White and with a median age of 5.4 months [interquartile range, 0.4-25.8 months]. Of those patients, 246 (0.6%) had ICAVB. The procedure with the highest incidence of ICAVB was the arterial switch operation with ventricular septal defect (VSD) repair (74 of 1552; 4.5%). On multivariable analysis, the arterial switch operation with VSD repair had the highest adjusted odds of ICAVB (odds ratio, 5.41; 95% CI, 3.57-8.19; P < .001) when compared with isolated VSD repair. A diagnosis of endocarditis was significantly associated with ICAVB. Center volume was not associated with ICAVB. ICAVB was associated with a 121% (95% CI, 98.5%-146.8%) increase in length of stay (P < .001) and increased in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.34-3.82; P < .001).
Conclusions: The overall incidence of ICAVB after CHS is low. However, certain procedures have incidences as high as 4.5%. ICAVB is associated with increased postoperative mortality and length of stay. Further work is needed to identify drivers of variation among centers to improve overall outcomes.
{"title":"Incidence and Outcomes of Iatrogenic Complete Atrioventricular Block After Congenital Heart Surgery.","authors":"Mario O'Connor, Andrew Well, Arnold Fenrich, Neil M Venardos, Daniel Shmorhun, Carlos M Mery, Charles D Fraser","doi":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.09.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.09.002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Iatrogenic complete atrioventricular block (ICAVB) has long been noted as a major complication after congenital heart surgery (CHS), and it contributes to complex postoperative care and potentially affects patients' outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a retrospective review of the Pediatric Health Information System database from January 1, 2004 to September 30, 2023. All patients who underwent The Society of Thoracic Surgeons benchmark procedures were included. International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9th and 10th editions were used to identify diagnoses and procedures. All patients with a diagnosis of complete atrioventricular block and placement of a permanent pacemaker after CHS but in the same hospitalization were identified as having ICAVB.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 42,332 patients were identified, with 17,106 (41%) female and 23,042 (55%) non-Hispanic White and with a median age of 5.4 months [interquartile range, 0.4-25.8 months]. Of those patients, 246 (0.6%) had ICAVB. The procedure with the highest incidence of ICAVB was the arterial switch operation with ventricular septal defect (VSD) repair (74 of 1552; 4.5%). On multivariable analysis, the arterial switch operation with VSD repair had the highest adjusted odds of ICAVB (odds ratio, 5.41; 95% CI, 3.57-8.19; P < .001) when compared with isolated VSD repair. A diagnosis of endocarditis was significantly associated with ICAVB. Center volume was not associated with ICAVB. ICAVB was associated with a 121% (95% CI, 98.5%-146.8%) increase in length of stay (P < .001) and increased in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.34-3.82; P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The overall incidence of ICAVB after CHS is low. However, certain procedures have incidences as high as 4.5%. ICAVB is associated with increased postoperative mortality and length of stay. Further work is needed to identify drivers of variation among centers to improve overall outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50976,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300212","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-12DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.09.001
Jung-Hoon Shin, Seung-Hyun Lee, Hyun-Chul Joo, Young-Nam Youn, Jung-Hwan Kim, Sak Lee
Background: Atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR), defined by normal left ventricular function, enlarged left atrium, and a dilated mitral valve annulus, has been a concept discussed for >10 years. However, there are still no established guidelines for its treatment in the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association recommendations. This study aimed to determine the long-term outcomes of mitral annuloplasty as a treatment for AFMR.
Methods: We analyzed 1435 patients who underwent mitral valve repair at our institution between 2005 and 2020, with 162 classified as having AFMR. Exclusion criteria for AFMR were established based on preoperative echocardiography and operative notes. The primary outcome was overall mortality, and the secondary outcome was MR recurrence, which was defined as moderate or greater mitral regurgitation observed on echocardiography during the follow-up period, analyzed using our hospital's medical records and data from the National Statistical Office.
Results: The median follow-up duration for the entire patient cohort was 6.1 years (interquartile range, 3.2-11.2 years). Patients had a 5-year survival rate of 86% and a 10-year survival rate of 73%, with freedom from MR recurrence rates of 89% and 80% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Although all 162 patients had moderate or greater MR before surgery, most experienced trivial or mild MR after mitral valve repair throughout the follow-up period.
Conclusions: In summary, mitral valve repair effectively treats patients with AFMR, addressing survival and mitigating MR recurrence.
{"title":"Long-term Outcomes of Mitral Valve Repair for Atrial Functional Mitral Regurgitation.","authors":"Jung-Hoon Shin, Seung-Hyun Lee, Hyun-Chul Joo, Young-Nam Youn, Jung-Hwan Kim, Sak Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.09.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.09.001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR), defined by normal left ventricular function, enlarged left atrium, and a dilated mitral valve annulus, has been a concept discussed for >10 years. However, there are still no established guidelines for its treatment in the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association recommendations. This study aimed to determine the long-term outcomes of mitral annuloplasty as a treatment for AFMR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 1435 patients who underwent mitral valve repair at our institution between 2005 and 2020, with 162 classified as having AFMR. Exclusion criteria for AFMR were established based on preoperative echocardiography and operative notes. The primary outcome was overall mortality, and the secondary outcome was MR recurrence, which was defined as moderate or greater mitral regurgitation observed on echocardiography during the follow-up period, analyzed using our hospital's medical records and data from the National Statistical Office.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up duration for the entire patient cohort was 6.1 years (interquartile range, 3.2-11.2 years). Patients had a 5-year survival rate of 86% and a 10-year survival rate of 73%, with freedom from MR recurrence rates of 89% and 80% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Although all 162 patients had moderate or greater MR before surgery, most experienced trivial or mild MR after mitral valve repair throughout the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In summary, mitral valve repair effectively treats patients with AFMR, addressing survival and mitigating MR recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":50976,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300214","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-12DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.09.003
Sirisha Emani, Reece Donahue, Aminah Callender, Merhawi Ghebremichael, Meena Nathan, Juan C Ibla, Sitaram Emani
Background: Postoperative bleeding is associated with significant resource use and is an important contributor to other major adverse events in pediatric patients undergoing complex cardiac surgical procedures. Thromboelastography (TEG; TEG 6S, Haemonetics) can guide perioperative blood product transfusions to reduce the risk of postoperative bleeding. This study validated the use of a previously developed TEG 6S maximum amplitude (TEG-MA)-based platelet transfusion calculator used during cardiac surgical procedures to minimize the risk of postoperative bleeding.
Methods: In this single-center retrospective study of pediatric patients (aged ≤18 years) who underwent cardiac surgical procedures requiring cardiopulmonary bypass at Boston Children's Hospital (Boston, MA) (N = 1000), the volume of platelet transfusion administered at surgical team discretion was compared with the platelet calculator-recommended platelet transfusion volume by using linear regression analysis. Associations between the adequacy of perioperative platelet transfusion and postoperative bleeding or thrombotic complications within the first 24 hours postoperatively (bleeding) and until hospital discharge (thrombosis) were evaluated by logistic regression analysis.
Results: Lower TEG-MA (≤45 mm) measurements after transfusion were associated with a higher risk for postoperative bleeding (odds ratio, 4.4; 95% CI, 2.6-7.4; P < .01 [significant P value <.05]). The platelet transfusion calculator-recommended platelet transfusion volume (on the basis of TEG-MA measured at the time of rewarming) demonstrated moderate correlation with the measured TEG-MA value after platelet transfusion (Pearson r = 0.7). Intraoperative volumes of platelet transfusion that failed to increase a postoperative TEG-MA of at least 45 mm significantly increased the risk for postoperative bleeding in the first 24 hours after surgical procedures (odds ratio, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.9-5.4; P < .01 [significant P value <.05]). The posttransfusion TEG-MA was not independently associated with thrombosis.
Conclusions: Customizing perioperative platelet transfusion therapy by using quantitative diagnostic tests can help reduce postoperative bleeding complications.
{"title":"Thromboelastography-guided Intraoperative Platelet Transfusion in Pediatric Heart Surgery.","authors":"Sirisha Emani, Reece Donahue, Aminah Callender, Merhawi Ghebremichael, Meena Nathan, Juan C Ibla, Sitaram Emani","doi":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.09.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.09.003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative bleeding is associated with significant resource use and is an important contributor to other major adverse events in pediatric patients undergoing complex cardiac surgical procedures. Thromboelastography (TEG; TEG 6S, Haemonetics) can guide perioperative blood product transfusions to reduce the risk of postoperative bleeding. This study validated the use of a previously developed TEG 6S maximum amplitude (TEG-MA)-based platelet transfusion calculator used during cardiac surgical procedures to minimize the risk of postoperative bleeding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center retrospective study of pediatric patients (aged ≤18 years) who underwent cardiac surgical procedures requiring cardiopulmonary bypass at Boston Children's Hospital (Boston, MA) (N = 1000), the volume of platelet transfusion administered at surgical team discretion was compared with the platelet calculator-recommended platelet transfusion volume by using linear regression analysis. Associations between the adequacy of perioperative platelet transfusion and postoperative bleeding or thrombotic complications within the first 24 hours postoperatively (bleeding) and until hospital discharge (thrombosis) were evaluated by logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lower TEG-MA (≤45 mm) measurements after transfusion were associated with a higher risk for postoperative bleeding (odds ratio, 4.4; 95% CI, 2.6-7.4; P < .01 [significant P value <.05]). The platelet transfusion calculator-recommended platelet transfusion volume (on the basis of TEG-MA measured at the time of rewarming) demonstrated moderate correlation with the measured TEG-MA value after platelet transfusion (Pearson r = 0.7). Intraoperative volumes of platelet transfusion that failed to increase a postoperative TEG-MA of at least 45 mm significantly increased the risk for postoperative bleeding in the first 24 hours after surgical procedures (odds ratio, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.9-5.4; P < .01 [significant P value <.05]). The posttransfusion TEG-MA was not independently associated with thrombosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Customizing perioperative platelet transfusion therapy by using quantitative diagnostic tests can help reduce postoperative bleeding complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":50976,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300234","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-12DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.07.053
Nimesh D Desai, Grace J Wang, William Brinkman, Joseph Coselli, Bradley Taylor, Himanshu Patel, Michael Dake, Fernando Fleischman, Jean Panneton, Jon Matsumura, Matthew Sweet, Randall DeMartino, Bradley Leshnower, Luis Sanchez, Joseph E Bavaria
Background: Intervention on Type B dissection frequently requires landing the proximal edge of the stent graft between the left common carotid artery and left subclavian artery (LSA). The Gore® TAG® Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis (TBE) is a technology which allows LSA preservation with a single internal branch.
Methods: This study was a prospective non-randomized single-arm clinical trial of patients with type B aortic dissection that were treated with the single branched device. Patients with operative indications for acute, chronic or residual Type B dissections that originated distal to the origin of a left subclavian artery suitable for branch graft placement were eligible for the study. Native aortic and surgical graft proximal landing zones were eligible.
Results: Among the 132 patients, there were 25 (18.9%) acute type B dissections, 79 (59.8%) of chronic type B dissections and 28 (21.1%) of residual dissections after previous open Type A repair. Percutaneous access was used in 105 (79.5%) patients. Overall, 30-day mortality occurred in 6 patients (4.5%). The overall 30 day stroke rate was 2/132(1.5%) and the one-year freedom from stroke was 96.8%. Device Technical Success and Procedural Success was achieved in 129/132(97.7%) and 110/132(83.3%) of subjects, respectively and there was one instance of loss of side branch patency. There was no persistent antegrade false lumen flow observed.
Conclusions: In this study of a novel branched endograft device to preserve the LSA in patients with type B dissection undergoing TEVAR, we demonstrate acceptable safety and efficacy outcomes at one year.
背景:对 B 型夹层的介入治疗经常需要将支架移植物的近端降落在左侧颈总动脉和左侧锁骨下动脉(LSA)之间。戈尔® TAG® 胸支内支架(TBE)是一种可通过单一内部分支保留 LSA 的技术:本研究是一项前瞻性非随机单臂临床试验,对象是使用单支装置治疗的 B 型主动脉夹层患者。有手术指征的急性、慢性或残余 B 型主动脉夹层患者均符合研究条件,这些患者的左锁骨下动脉起源远端适合分支移植。原生主动脉和手术移植物近端着床区均符合条件:在 132 名患者中,有 25 人(18.9%)为急性 B 型夹层,79 人(59.8%)为慢性 B 型夹层,28 人(21.1%)为 A 型开放式修复后的残余夹层。105例(79.5%)患者采用了经皮入路手术。总体而言,6 名患者(4.5%)在 30 天内死亡。30 天内中风总发生率为 2/132(1.5%),一年内无中风发生率为 96.8%。129/132(97.7%)和 110/132(83.3%)的受试者分别获得了设备技术成功和手术成功,有一例侧支失通。没有观察到持续的前向假腔流:在这项对接受 TEVAR 的 B 型夹层患者进行的保留 LSA 的新型支路内移植装置的研究中,我们证明了一年后的安全性和有效性都是可以接受的。
{"title":"Outcomes of a Novel Single Branched Aortic Stent Graft for Treatment of Type B Aortic Dissection.","authors":"Nimesh D Desai, Grace J Wang, William Brinkman, Joseph Coselli, Bradley Taylor, Himanshu Patel, Michael Dake, Fernando Fleischman, Jean Panneton, Jon Matsumura, Matthew Sweet, Randall DeMartino, Bradley Leshnower, Luis Sanchez, Joseph E Bavaria","doi":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.07.053","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.07.053","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intervention on Type B dissection frequently requires landing the proximal edge of the stent graft between the left common carotid artery and left subclavian artery (LSA). The Gore® TAG® Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis (TBE) is a technology which allows LSA preservation with a single internal branch.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a prospective non-randomized single-arm clinical trial of patients with type B aortic dissection that were treated with the single branched device. Patients with operative indications for acute, chronic or residual Type B dissections that originated distal to the origin of a left subclavian artery suitable for branch graft placement were eligible for the study. Native aortic and surgical graft proximal landing zones were eligible.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 132 patients, there were 25 (18.9%) acute type B dissections, 79 (59.8%) of chronic type B dissections and 28 (21.1%) of residual dissections after previous open Type A repair. Percutaneous access was used in 105 (79.5%) patients. Overall, 30-day mortality occurred in 6 patients (4.5%). The overall 30 day stroke rate was 2/132(1.5%) and the one-year freedom from stroke was 96.8%. Device Technical Success and Procedural Success was achieved in 129/132(97.7%) and 110/132(83.3%) of subjects, respectively and there was one instance of loss of side branch patency. There was no persistent antegrade false lumen flow observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study of a novel branched endograft device to preserve the LSA in patients with type B dissection undergoing TEVAR, we demonstrate acceptable safety and efficacy outcomes at one year.</p>","PeriodicalId":50976,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300230","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Thoracoscopic esophagectomy is a less invasive surgical procedure; however, evidence of its effect on long-term survival is limited. We evaluated long-term survival after the procedure in patients with esophageal carcinoma.
Methods: This retrospective multicenter study involved 1559 consecutive patients with esophageal carcinoma who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy or open esophagectomy between 2012 and 2019 at 2 Japanese high-volume cancer centers. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to compare short- and long-term outcomes. In addition, stage-specific survival rates were compared between the groups.
Results: There were 313 patients who were matched and analyzed. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 84.5%, 60.5%, and 52.1%, respectively, in the matched open esophagectomy group; and 87.2%, 68.6%, and 61.8%, respectively, in the matched thoracoscopic esophagectomy group. The weighted Cox regression model showed significantly better survival in the thoracoscopic esophagectomy group than in the open esophagectomy group (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.582-0.941). Deaths from other causes occurred more frequently in the open esophagectomy group than in the thoracoscopic esophagectomy group. Stratified analysis showed no significant survival differences between clinical stage I or II and pathologic stage 0 or I subgroups. However, the thoracoscopic esophagectomy groups with clinical stage III or IV and pathologic stage II, III, or IV had significantly better overall survival.
Conclusions: This study demonstrated the survival benefits of thoracoscopic esophagectomy, particularly for highly advanced esophageal carcinoma.
{"title":"Long-term Survival in Esophageal Cancer: Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy.","authors":"Shota Igaue, Takeo Fujita, Junya Oguma, Koshiro Ishiyama, Kazuma Sato, Daisuke Kurita, Kentaro Kubo, Daichi Utsunomiya, Ryoko Nozaki, Hiroshi Imazeki, Shun Yamamoto, Ken Kato, Hiroyuki Daiko","doi":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.09.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.09.004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thoracoscopic esophagectomy is a less invasive surgical procedure; however, evidence of its effect on long-term survival is limited. We evaluated long-term survival after the procedure in patients with esophageal carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective multicenter study involved 1559 consecutive patients with esophageal carcinoma who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy or open esophagectomy between 2012 and 2019 at 2 Japanese high-volume cancer centers. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to compare short- and long-term outcomes. In addition, stage-specific survival rates were compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 313 patients who were matched and analyzed. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 84.5%, 60.5%, and 52.1%, respectively, in the matched open esophagectomy group; and 87.2%, 68.6%, and 61.8%, respectively, in the matched thoracoscopic esophagectomy group. The weighted Cox regression model showed significantly better survival in the thoracoscopic esophagectomy group than in the open esophagectomy group (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.582-0.941). Deaths from other causes occurred more frequently in the open esophagectomy group than in the thoracoscopic esophagectomy group. Stratified analysis showed no significant survival differences between clinical stage I or II and pathologic stage 0 or I subgroups. However, the thoracoscopic esophagectomy groups with clinical stage III or IV and pathologic stage II, III, or IV had significantly better overall survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated the survival benefits of thoracoscopic esophagectomy, particularly for highly advanced esophageal carcinoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":50976,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-10DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.07.052
Michael M Madani, Christoph B Wiedenroth, David P Jenkins, Elie Fadel, Marc de Perrot
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a consequence of unresolved organized thromboembolic obstruction of the pulmonary arteries, which can cause pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular failure. Owing to its subtle signs, determining its exact incidence and prevalence is challenging. Furthermore, CTEPH may also present without any prior venous thromboembolic history, contributing to underdiagnosis and undertreatment. Diagnosis requires a high degree of suspicion and is ruled out by a normal ventilation/perfusion ratio scintigraphy. Additional imaging by computed tomography and/or conventional angiography, as well as right heart catheterization, are required to confirm CTEPH and formulate treatment plans. Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy is the treatment of choice for eligible patients and can be potentially curative. Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy has a low mortality rate of 1% to 2% at expert centers and offers excellent long-term survival. Furthermore, recent advances in the techniques allow distal endarterectomy with comparable outcomes. Alternative treatment options are available for those who may not be operable or have prohibitive risks, providing some benefit. However, CTEPH is a progressive disease with low long-term survival rates if left untreated. Given excellent short- and long-term outcomes of surgery, as well as the benefits seen with other treatment modalities in noncandidate patients, it is crucial that precapillary pulmonary hypertension and CTEPH are ruled out in any patient with dyspnea of unexplained etiology. These patients should be referred to expert centers where accurate operability assessment and appropriate treatment strategies can be offered by a multidisciplinary team.
{"title":"Pulmonary Thromboendarterectomy: The Potentially Curative Treatment of Choice for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension.","authors":"Michael M Madani, Christoph B Wiedenroth, David P Jenkins, Elie Fadel, Marc de Perrot","doi":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.07.052","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.07.052","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a consequence of unresolved organized thromboembolic obstruction of the pulmonary arteries, which can cause pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular failure. Owing to its subtle signs, determining its exact incidence and prevalence is challenging. Furthermore, CTEPH may also present without any prior venous thromboembolic history, contributing to underdiagnosis and undertreatment. Diagnosis requires a high degree of suspicion and is ruled out by a normal ventilation/perfusion ratio scintigraphy. Additional imaging by computed tomography and/or conventional angiography, as well as right heart catheterization, are required to confirm CTEPH and formulate treatment plans. Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy is the treatment of choice for eligible patients and can be potentially curative. Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy has a low mortality rate of 1% to 2% at expert centers and offers excellent long-term survival. Furthermore, recent advances in the techniques allow distal endarterectomy with comparable outcomes. Alternative treatment options are available for those who may not be operable or have prohibitive risks, providing some benefit. However, CTEPH is a progressive disease with low long-term survival rates if left untreated. Given excellent short- and long-term outcomes of surgery, as well as the benefits seen with other treatment modalities in noncandidate patients, it is crucial that precapillary pulmonary hypertension and CTEPH are ruled out in any patient with dyspnea of unexplained etiology. These patients should be referred to expert centers where accurate operability assessment and appropriate treatment strategies can be offered by a multidisciplinary team.</p>","PeriodicalId":50976,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-07DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.07.045
Selim Mosbahi, Mikolaj Berezowski, Joseph E Bavaria, John J Kelly, Nicholas Goel, Fei Jiang, Murat Yildiz, Yu Zhao, Wilson Y Szeto, Nimesh D Desai
Background: We aim to evaluate the impact of antegrade stenting of the distal arch and proximal descending aorta combined with non-total arch procedures in acute type A aortic dissection.
Methods: From 2005 to 2022, 733 nonsyndromic patients presented with acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection and underwent non-total arch procedure. Ninety-five patients underwent antegrade stenting and 638 did not. Propensity-score analysis was performed, and 95 optimal pairs were created. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and cumulative incidence of reintervention with death as a competing event was calculated and compared using Gray's method.
Results: Survival estimates at 10 years after propensity score matching were similar between both groups, 58.9% (95% CI, 46.5%-74.5%) vs 58.4% (95% CI, 48.3%-70.6%) (P = .6) in the non-stented vs stented group. Cumulative incidence of reintervention with competing risk of death at 10 years after propensity matching was 27% (95% CI, 17%-37%) vs 22% (95% CI, 14%-32%) (P = .44), respectively.
Conclusions: Antegrade thoracic endovascular aortic repair may be beneficial for remodeling and facilitating future endovascular reinterventions and reduces the occurrence of reintervention for malperfusion.
{"title":"Long-Term Outcomes of Antegrade Thoracic Stent Grafting During Repair of Acute DeBakey I Dissection.","authors":"Selim Mosbahi, Mikolaj Berezowski, Joseph E Bavaria, John J Kelly, Nicholas Goel, Fei Jiang, Murat Yildiz, Yu Zhao, Wilson Y Szeto, Nimesh D Desai","doi":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.07.045","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.07.045","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aim to evaluate the impact of antegrade stenting of the distal arch and proximal descending aorta combined with non-total arch procedures in acute type A aortic dissection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 2005 to 2022, 733 nonsyndromic patients presented with acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection and underwent non-total arch procedure. Ninety-five patients underwent antegrade stenting and 638 did not. Propensity-score analysis was performed, and 95 optimal pairs were created. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and cumulative incidence of reintervention with death as a competing event was calculated and compared using Gray's method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survival estimates at 10 years after propensity score matching were similar between both groups, 58.9% (95% CI, 46.5%-74.5%) vs 58.4% (95% CI, 48.3%-70.6%) (P = .6) in the non-stented vs stented group. Cumulative incidence of reintervention with competing risk of death at 10 years after propensity matching was 27% (95% CI, 17%-37%) vs 22% (95% CI, 14%-32%) (P = .44), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Antegrade thoracic endovascular aortic repair may be beneficial for remodeling and facilitating future endovascular reinterventions and reduces the occurrence of reintervention for malperfusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":50976,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142057150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-07DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.08.004
Alex M Wisniewski, Sanjana Challa, Raymond J Strobel, Anthony V Norman, Leora T Yarboro, Kenan Yount, John Kern, Michael Mazzeffi, Nicholas R Teman
Background: Due to staffing changes at scheduled intervals and decreases in essential staff in the evenings, late intensive care unit (ICU) arrivals may be at risk for suboptimal outcomes. Utilizing a regional collaborative, we sought to determine the effect of ICU arrival timing on outcomes in elective isolated coronary artery bypass.
Methods: Adults undergoing elective, isolated coronary artery bypass from 17 hospitals between 2013 and 2023 were identified. Patients with missing predicted risk of mortality or missing ICU arrival time were excluded. Late ICU arrival time was defined as between 6:00 pm and 6:00 am. Hierarchical logistic regression with appropriate predicted risk scores was utilized for outcome risk adjustment.
Results: We identified 11,638 patients, with 972 (8.4%) experiencing late ICU arrival. Late ICU arrival patients had higher predicted risk of morbidity or mortality (8.2%; [interquartile range {IQR}, 5.6%, 12.0%] vs 7.7% [IQR, 5.5%, 11.5%], P = .048) compared with early ICU arrival patients with longer median cardiopulmonary bypass times (96 minutes [IQR, 78, 119] vs 93 [IQR, 73, 116], P < .001). Late ICU arrival patients experienced more unadjusted complications including prolonged ventilation (7.7% vs 4.2%, P < .001) and operative mortality (2.0% vs 1.1%, P = .02), although no difference in failure-to-rescue (11.0% vs 10.4%, P = .84). Logistic regression with risk adjustment demonstrated late ICU arrival as a predictor of prolonged ventilation (odds ratio, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.12-1.99], P = .006).
Conclusions: After adjustment, late ICU arrivals experienced higher rates of prolonged ventilation, although this did not translate to failure-to-rescue.
{"title":"Does Timing Matter? The Effect of Intensive Care Unit Arrival Timing on Elective Cardiac Surgery.","authors":"Alex M Wisniewski, Sanjana Challa, Raymond J Strobel, Anthony V Norman, Leora T Yarboro, Kenan Yount, John Kern, Michael Mazzeffi, Nicholas R Teman","doi":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.08.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.08.004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Due to staffing changes at scheduled intervals and decreases in essential staff in the evenings, late intensive care unit (ICU) arrivals may be at risk for suboptimal outcomes. Utilizing a regional collaborative, we sought to determine the effect of ICU arrival timing on outcomes in elective isolated coronary artery bypass.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults undergoing elective, isolated coronary artery bypass from 17 hospitals between 2013 and 2023 were identified. Patients with missing predicted risk of mortality or missing ICU arrival time were excluded. Late ICU arrival time was defined as between 6:00 pm and 6:00 am. Hierarchical logistic regression with appropriate predicted risk scores was utilized for outcome risk adjustment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 11,638 patients, with 972 (8.4%) experiencing late ICU arrival. Late ICU arrival patients had higher predicted risk of morbidity or mortality (8.2%; [interquartile range {IQR}, 5.6%, 12.0%] vs 7.7% [IQR, 5.5%, 11.5%], P = .048) compared with early ICU arrival patients with longer median cardiopulmonary bypass times (96 minutes [IQR, 78, 119] vs 93 [IQR, 73, 116], P < .001). Late ICU arrival patients experienced more unadjusted complications including prolonged ventilation (7.7% vs 4.2%, P < .001) and operative mortality (2.0% vs 1.1%, P = .02), although no difference in failure-to-rescue (11.0% vs 10.4%, P = .84). Logistic regression with risk adjustment demonstrated late ICU arrival as a predictor of prolonged ventilation (odds ratio, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.12-1.99], P = .006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After adjustment, late ICU arrivals experienced higher rates of prolonged ventilation, although this did not translate to failure-to-rescue.</p>","PeriodicalId":50976,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142057149","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}