Pamela E. Michael, J. Christopher Haney, Jeffrey S. Gleason, Kathy M. Hixson, Yvan G. Satgé, Patrick G. R. Jodice
Flying fish (family Exocoetidae) play an important role in marine food webs, linking sub-surface and aerial predators. The association of seabirds with sub-surface predators in subtropical and tropical regions through facilitated foraging events is a well-known phenomenon and is sometimes used to identify fishing grounds for flying fish, flying fish roe, and tunas. In the northern Gulf of Mexico (nGoM), few studies have assessed flying fish distribution, and none have directly evaluated flying fish–seabird co-occurrence. Using vessel-based observations of surfacing flying fish flights, we characterized the distribution of flying fish and their co-occurrence patterns with seabirds in the nGoM. We modeled the distribution and relative density of flying fish flights using Generalized Additive Models. We then assessed co-occurrence patterns of flying fish with all seabird species seen in the area, encompassing the footprint of flying fish detections. Flying fish were detected across the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone, with flight densities greater on the mid-continental shelf and into pelagic waters south of Louisiana, and greater flight densities were associated with regionally low chlorophyll-a and warm water. Flying fish flights were greatest in spring months through early fall months. Sooty terns (Onychoprion fuscatus), considered near-obligate commensals with tuna, contributed a much higher percent of the cumulative density of the seabirds co-occurring with versus without flying fish. Flying fish could be an ecological attractant for high abundances of visually conspicuous sooty terns, the presence of which may lead to the formation of ephemeral facilitated foraging events consisting of mixed-species seabird flocks.
{"title":"Flying Fish Habitat and Co-Occurrence With Seabirds in the Northern Gulf of Mexico","authors":"Pamela E. Michael, J. Christopher Haney, Jeffrey S. Gleason, Kathy M. Hixson, Yvan G. Satgé, Patrick G. R. Jodice","doi":"10.1111/fog.12712","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/fog.12712","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Flying fish (family <i>Exocoetidae</i>) play an important role in marine food webs, linking sub-surface and aerial predators. The association of seabirds with sub-surface predators in subtropical and tropical regions through facilitated foraging events is a well-known phenomenon and is sometimes used to identify fishing grounds for flying fish, flying fish roe, and tunas. In the northern Gulf of Mexico (nGoM), few studies have assessed flying fish distribution, and none have directly evaluated flying fish–seabird co-occurrence. Using vessel-based observations of surfacing flying fish flights, we characterized the distribution of flying fish and their co-occurrence patterns with seabirds in the nGoM. We modeled the distribution and relative density of flying fish flights using Generalized Additive Models. We then assessed co-occurrence patterns of flying fish with all seabird species seen in the area, encompassing the footprint of flying fish detections. Flying fish were detected across the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone, with flight densities greater on the mid-continental shelf and into pelagic waters south of Louisiana, and greater flight densities were associated with regionally low chlorophyll-<i>a</i> and warm water. Flying fish flights were greatest in spring months through early fall months. Sooty terns (<i>Onychoprion fuscatus</i>), considered near-obligate commensals with tuna, contributed a much higher percent of the cumulative density of the seabirds co-occurring with versus without flying fish. Flying fish could be an ecological attractant for high abundances of visually conspicuous sooty terns, the presence of which may lead to the formation of ephemeral facilitated foraging events consisting of mixed-species seabird flocks.</p>","PeriodicalId":51054,"journal":{"name":"Fisheries Oceanography","volume":"34 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fog.12712","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143762355","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marina Chaji, Greg Ardini, Melanie Harsch, Alan Haynie, Min-Yang Lee, Bryce McManus, Tammy Murphy, Lisa Pfeiffer, Eric Thunberg
Offshore wind energy has expanded as a source of clean energy in the United States since the first US offshore wind farm began operations off the coast of Rhode Island in 2016. The emergence of offshore wind has increased the need to manage ocean use across multiple stakeholder groups, a difficult and contentious process. We use 15 years of scallop (Placopecten magellanicus) fishery data to describe how offshore wind may expose one of the most valuable commercial fisheries in the United States to economic risks. Our analysis shows that the current configuration of approved offshore wind lease areas off the northeastern coast of the United States is expected to result in relatively small economic exposure for the scallop fishery. We also illustrate how the measured development process, which includes ample opportunity for stakeholder input, has mitigated exposure through minimization or avoidance by characterizing the change in impacted activity through two case studies. We find moderate to strong levels of exposure mitigation across our three scallop fleet métiers within the Central Atlantic (CA) region. In contrast, exposure mitigation was more variable in the New York Bight (NYB) region suggesting mitigation methods in the NYB are not as effective for the scallop fishery as the CA. The open development process that allowed for early stakeholder engagement has largely mitigated the potential for economic risk of offshore wind on the scallop industry by approving the siting of offshore wind development in less utilized or less productive scalloping areas.
{"title":"Assessing Impacts of Offshore Wind Development: An Analysis of the Minimization of Economic Exposure of the Scallop Fishery Through the Regulatory Process","authors":"Marina Chaji, Greg Ardini, Melanie Harsch, Alan Haynie, Min-Yang Lee, Bryce McManus, Tammy Murphy, Lisa Pfeiffer, Eric Thunberg","doi":"10.1111/fog.12717","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/fog.12717","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Offshore wind energy has expanded as a source of clean energy in the United States since the first US offshore wind farm began operations off the coast of Rhode Island in 2016. The emergence of offshore wind has increased the need to manage ocean use across multiple stakeholder groups, a difficult and contentious process. We use 15 years of scallop (<i>Placopecten magellanicus</i>) fishery data to describe how offshore wind may expose one of the most valuable commercial fisheries in the United States to economic risks. Our analysis shows that the current configuration of approved offshore wind lease areas off the northeastern coast of the United States is expected to result in relatively small economic exposure for the scallop fishery. We also illustrate how the measured development process, which includes ample opportunity for stakeholder input, has mitigated exposure through <i>minimization</i> or <i>avoidance</i> by characterizing the change in impacted activity through two case studies. We find moderate to strong levels of exposure mitigation across our three scallop fleet métiers within the Central Atlantic (CA) region. In contrast, exposure mitigation was more variable in the New York Bight (NYB) region suggesting mitigation methods in the NYB are not as effective for the scallop fishery as the CA. The open development process that allowed for early stakeholder engagement has largely mitigated the potential for economic risk of offshore wind on the scallop industry by approving the siting of offshore wind development in less utilized or less productive scalloping areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":51054,"journal":{"name":"Fisheries Oceanography","volume":"35 1","pages":"49-61"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fog.12717","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145993903","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}