首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Arthroplasty最新文献

英文 中文
Practical Implications of Value Based Care in the Setting of Ambulatory Surgery Center. 基于价值的医疗服务在非住院手术中心环境中的实际意义。
IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.027
Isaac Hung, David S Jevsevar, Troy Simonson, Zeev N Kain
{"title":"Practical Implications of Value Based Care in the Setting of Ambulatory Surgery Center.","authors":"Isaac Hung, David S Jevsevar, Troy Simonson, Zeev N Kain","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.027","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.027","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142649672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Revitalizing MSK Healthcare: A Strategic Approach to Value-Based Care. 振兴 MSK 医疗保健:基于价值的医疗保健战略方法。
IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.026
Isaac Hung, Zeev N Kain, Kevin J Bozic
{"title":"Revitalizing MSK Healthcare: A Strategic Approach to Value-Based Care.","authors":"Isaac Hung, Zeev N Kain, Kevin J Bozic","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.026","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142649674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Increasing Utilization of Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis Following Total Knee Arthroplasty from 2010 to 2022. 从 2010 年到 2022 年,全膝关节置换术后延长口服抗生素预防的使用率不断提高。
IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.018
Amy Y Zhao, Victoria E Bergstein, Amil R Agarwal, Avilash Das, Shyam Kurian, Majd Marrache, Gregory J Golladay, Savyasachi C Thakkar

Introduction: Extended oral antibiotic (EOA) prophylaxis has been shown to reduce rates of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in high-risk patients following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Although national societies' recommendations against their use and clinical efficacy remain controversial, the increase in the literature surrounding EOA prophylaxis suggests a potential change in practice patterns that may warrant the creation of national guidelines. The purpose of this study was to investigate the trends in the utilization of EOA prophylaxis following TKA from 2010 to 2022.

Methods: Patients who underwent primary or aseptic revision TKA between 2010 and 2022 were identified in a national administrative claims database. Temporal trends in EOA usage following primary or revision TKA were calculated, and secondary analysis examined rates of utilization across demographics, including patients considered at high-risk for infection. In total, 1,258,759 primary and 91,530 aseptic revision TKA patients were included in this study.

Results: From 2010 to 2022, EOA prescriptions increased by 321 and 368% following primary and revision TKA, respectively. Rates of utilization among high-risk individuals were similar to those of the general population.

Discussion: The use of EOA prophylaxis after TKA has increased significantly since 2010. Given their increasing usage and variation in prescription patterns among patients at high risk of infection, guidelines surrounding their use are necessary to promote antibiotic stewardship while preventing rates of infection.

简介:事实证明,延长口服抗生素(EOA)预防可降低全膝关节置换术(TKA)后高风险患者的假体周围关节感染(PJI)率。尽管国家学会对其使用和临床疗效的建议仍存在争议,但有关 EOA 预防的文献增加表明,实践模式可能会发生变化,这就需要制定国家指南。本研究旨在调查2010年至2022年TKA术后使用EOA预防措施的趋势:方法:从全国行政索赔数据库中找出 2010 年至 2022 年间接受初次或无菌翻修 TKA 的患者。计算了初次或翻修 TKA 后使用 EOA 的时间趋势,并进行了二次分析,检查了不同人口统计学特征的使用率,包括被视为感染高风险的患者。本研究共纳入了1,258,759例初次TKA患者和91,530例无菌翻修TKA患者:从 2010 年到 2022 年,初治和翻修 TKA 患者的 EOA 处方分别增加了 321% 和 368%。高危人群的使用率与普通人群相似:讨论:自 2010 年以来,TKA 术后 EOA 预防用药的使用率显著增加。鉴于其使用量不断增加,且感染高风险患者的处方模式存在差异,有必要制定有关其使用的指南,以促进抗生素管理,同时预防感染率。
{"title":"Increasing Utilization of Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis Following Total Knee Arthroplasty from 2010 to 2022.","authors":"Amy Y Zhao, Victoria E Bergstein, Amil R Agarwal, Avilash Das, Shyam Kurian, Majd Marrache, Gregory J Golladay, Savyasachi C Thakkar","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Extended oral antibiotic (EOA) prophylaxis has been shown to reduce rates of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in high-risk patients following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Although national societies' recommendations against their use and clinical efficacy remain controversial, the increase in the literature surrounding EOA prophylaxis suggests a potential change in practice patterns that may warrant the creation of national guidelines. The purpose of this study was to investigate the trends in the utilization of EOA prophylaxis following TKA from 2010 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent primary or aseptic revision TKA between 2010 and 2022 were identified in a national administrative claims database. Temporal trends in EOA usage following primary or revision TKA were calculated, and secondary analysis examined rates of utilization across demographics, including patients considered at high-risk for infection. In total, 1,258,759 primary and 91,530 aseptic revision TKA patients were included in this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2010 to 2022, EOA prescriptions increased by 321 and 368% following primary and revision TKA, respectively. Rates of utilization among high-risk individuals were similar to those of the general population.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The use of EOA prophylaxis after TKA has increased significantly since 2010. Given their increasing usage and variation in prescription patterns among patients at high risk of infection, guidelines surrounding their use are necessary to promote antibiotic stewardship while preventing rates of infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142649658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rates of Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Among High-Risk and Standard-Risk Patients: 2009 to 2022. 高风险和标准风险患者初次全膝关节置换术后延长口服抗生素预防的比率:2009年至2022年。
IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.017
Vivek A Pisharody, Andrew Fuqua, Ayomide Ayeni, Greg Erens, Jacob M Wilson, Ajay Premkumar

Introduction: Recent evidence suggests extended courses of oral antibiotics (EOA) after total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty may reduce the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in high-risk patients. EOA rates after THA have risen significantly. However, there is a lack of epidemiologic data on EOA prophylaxis following TKA. Therefore, we investigated national trends in EOA prophylaxis for primary TKA and whether these rates were reflective of changes in patient risk or prescribing practices.

Methods: Adult patients undergoing TKA between 2009 and 2022 were identified in a national insurance claims database (Merative Marketscan). EOA was defined as a 7-14 day course of a first-generation cephalosporin, cefdinir, clindamycin, doxycycline, or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole filled between 5 days preoperatively to 3 days postoperatively. Annual EOA rates were calculated and stratified by preoperative PJI risk. Multivariable logistic regression was used to explore whether rates reflected changing patient characteristics. Future rates were predicted with time-series forecasting.

Results: We identified 712,212 eligible TKA cases. EOA rates rose from 0.91% in 2009 to 7.95% in 2022. Rates increased by 686% among standard-risk patients and 786% among high-risk patients. Logistic regression models using patient comorbidities could not account for changes in EOA rates. EOA rates were projected to rise to 18.3% (CF: 7.5-29.0%) by 2030.

Conclusion: Rates of EOA prophylaxis after TKA rose significantly from 2009 to 2022. This trend could not be explained by changing patient characteristics, suggesting widespread changes in antibiotic prescribing practices, which may be reflective of recent studies favoring EOA use. There is a need for further high-quality research examining the safety, efficacy, and role of EOA prophylaxis in the primary TKA patient population.

简介:最近的证据表明,全髋(THA)和全膝(TKA)关节置换术后延长口服抗生素(EOA)疗程可降低高危患者发生假体周围关节感染(PJI)的风险。全髋关节置换术(THA)后的 EOA 感染率大幅上升。然而,目前还缺乏有关 TKA 术后 EOA 预防的流行病学数据。因此,我们调查了全国一级 TKA 的 EOA 预防趋势,以及这些比率是否反映了患者风险或处方实践的变化:从全国保险理赔数据库(Merative Marketscan)中确定了 2009 年至 2022 年期间接受 TKA 手术的成人患者。EOA的定义是术前5天至术后3天期间使用第一代头孢菌素、头孢地尼、克林霉素、强力霉素或三甲氧苄氨嘧啶-磺胺甲噁唑的7-14天疗程。计算了年 EOA 率,并根据术前 PJI 风险进行了分层。采用多变量逻辑回归来探讨 EOA 率是否反映了患者特征的变化。结果:我们确定了 712,212 例符合条件的 TKA 病例。EOA率从2009年的0.91%上升到2022年的7.95%。标准风险患者的EOA率上升了686%,高风险患者的EOA率上升了786%。使用患者合并症的逻辑回归模型无法解释 EOA 率的变化。预计到 2030 年,EOA 率将上升至 18.3%(CF:7.5-29.0%):结论:从2009年到2022年,TKA术后的EOA预防率显著上升。这一趋势无法用患者特征的变化来解释,这表明抗生素处方实践发生了广泛的变化,这可能反映了近期的研究倾向于使用 EOA。有必要进一步开展高质量的研究,探讨 EOA 预防措施在初级 TKA 患者中的安全性、有效性和作用。
{"title":"Rates of Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Among High-Risk and Standard-Risk Patients: 2009 to 2022.","authors":"Vivek A Pisharody, Andrew Fuqua, Ayomide Ayeni, Greg Erens, Jacob M Wilson, Ajay Premkumar","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.017","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recent evidence suggests extended courses of oral antibiotics (EOA) after total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty may reduce the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in high-risk patients. EOA rates after THA have risen significantly. However, there is a lack of epidemiologic data on EOA prophylaxis following TKA. Therefore, we investigated national trends in EOA prophylaxis for primary TKA and whether these rates were reflective of changes in patient risk or prescribing practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients undergoing TKA between 2009 and 2022 were identified in a national insurance claims database (Merative Marketscan). EOA was defined as a 7-14 day course of a first-generation cephalosporin, cefdinir, clindamycin, doxycycline, or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole filled between 5 days preoperatively to 3 days postoperatively. Annual EOA rates were calculated and stratified by preoperative PJI risk. Multivariable logistic regression was used to explore whether rates reflected changing patient characteristics. Future rates were predicted with time-series forecasting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 712,212 eligible TKA cases. EOA rates rose from 0.91% in 2009 to 7.95% in 2022. Rates increased by 686% among standard-risk patients and 786% among high-risk patients. Logistic regression models using patient comorbidities could not account for changes in EOA rates. EOA rates were projected to rise to 18.3% (CF: 7.5-29.0%) by 2030.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rates of EOA prophylaxis after TKA rose significantly from 2009 to 2022. This trend could not be explained by changing patient characteristics, suggesting widespread changes in antibiotic prescribing practices, which may be reflective of recent studies favoring EOA use. There is a need for further high-quality research examining the safety, efficacy, and role of EOA prophylaxis in the primary TKA patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142649673","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is Younger Age a Risk Factor for Failure Following Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty? 年轻是否是无菌翻修全膝关节置换术失败的风险因素?
IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.014
JaeWon Yang, John J Bartoletta, Navin D Fernando, Paul A Manner, Antonia F Chen, Nicholas M Hernandez

Background: Revision total knee arthroplasties (rTKAs) are being performed more frequently in the United States in younger patients. Few large studies have evaluated the effect of age following rTKA. The study sought to evaluate the effect of age on rTKA outcomes.

Methods: The American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) was utilized to identify aseptic rTKAs in younger (18 to 64 years, n = 32,631) and older (> 65 years, n = 43,992) patients from January 2012 to September 2020, allowing for a minimum two-year follow-up. The mean age was 56 years in the younger cohort and 73 years in the older cohort. The mean follow-up was 5.4 years. Sex and BMI were similar between groups. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed with re-revision as the primary endpoint. Secondarily, multivariate analyses were performed to adjust for demographics and comorbidities.

Results: The proportion with re-revision was higher in the younger cohort compared to the older (8.1 versus 5.4%, P < 0.001). The ten-year survivorship free of all-cause re-revision was 90.2% (95% CI [confidence interval]: 89.7 to 90.7) in the younger cohort versus 93.7% (95% CI: 93.4 to 94.1) in the older cohort (P < 0.0001). Younger age was significantly associated with a higher adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause re-revision (HR: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.3 to 1.6), as were men (HR: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.2 to 1.5) and initial revision for instability (HR: 1.3, 95% CI: 1.1 to 1.5). In a subgroup analysis of patients aged < 65 years, a 5-year decrease in age was associated with a 10.0% increase in risk of re-revision. Indications for re-revisions differed among the younger and older cohorts (P < 0.01): infection (30.2 versus 34.9%), aseptic loosening (19.0 versus 15.8%), and instability (12.2 versus 12.7%).

Conclusion: Younger age, men, and initial revision performed for instability were associated with significantly increased risk for all-cause re-revision following aseptic rTKA. Notably, age may have a continuous effect on re-revision rates, as each 5-year decrease in age was associated with a 10% increase in risk of re-revision. Future research may further elucidate these increased risks in this younger patient population.

背景:在美国,年轻患者接受翻修全膝关节置换术(rTKA)的频率越来越高。很少有大型研究对膝关节置换术后年龄的影响进行评估。本研究旨在评估年龄对 rTKA 结果的影响:研究利用美国关节置换登记处(AJRR)来确定2012年1月至2020年9月期间年轻(18至64岁,n = 32,631)和年长(大于65岁,n = 43,992)患者的无菌rTKA,以便进行至少两年的随访。年轻组群的平均年龄为 56 岁,老年组群的平均年龄为 73 岁。平均随访时间为 5.4 年。两组患者的性别和体重指数相似。以再次复发为主要终点,进行了卡普兰-梅耶生存率分析。其次,还进行了多变量分析,以调整人口统计学和合并症:结果:与年龄较大的患者相比,年轻患者再次手术的比例更高(8.1% 对 5.4%,P < 0.001)。年轻组中无全因再切除的十年生存率为 90.2%(95% CI [置信区间]:89.7 至 90.7),而年长组为 93.7%(95% CI:93.4 至 94.1)(P < 0.0001)。年龄较小与全因再次翻修的调整后危险比(HR)较高(HR:1.4,95% CI:1.3-1.6)明显相关,与男性(HR:1.4,95% CI:1.2-1.5)和因不稳定而初次翻修(HR:1.3,95% CI:1.1-1.5)也明显相关。在对年龄小于65岁的患者进行的亚组分析中,年龄每降低5岁,再次翻修的风险就会增加10.0%。年轻组和老年组的再次手术指征有所不同(P < 0.01):感染(30.2% 对 34.9%)、无菌性松动(19.0% 对 15.8%)和不稳定性(12.2% 对 12.7%):结论:年龄较小、男性以及因不稳定而进行的首次翻修与无菌 RTKA 术后因各种原因再次翻修的风险显著增加有关。值得注意的是,年龄可能会对再次翻修率产生持续影响,因为年龄每降低5岁,再次翻修的风险就会增加10%。未来的研究可能会进一步阐明这一年轻患者群体的风险增加问题。
{"title":"Is Younger Age a Risk Factor for Failure Following Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty?","authors":"JaeWon Yang, John J Bartoletta, Navin D Fernando, Paul A Manner, Antonia F Chen, Nicholas M Hernandez","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Revision total knee arthroplasties (rTKAs) are being performed more frequently in the United States in younger patients. Few large studies have evaluated the effect of age following rTKA. The study sought to evaluate the effect of age on rTKA outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) was utilized to identify aseptic rTKAs in younger (18 to 64 years, n = 32,631) and older (> 65 years, n = 43,992) patients from January 2012 to September 2020, allowing for a minimum two-year follow-up. The mean age was 56 years in the younger cohort and 73 years in the older cohort. The mean follow-up was 5.4 years. Sex and BMI were similar between groups. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed with re-revision as the primary endpoint. Secondarily, multivariate analyses were performed to adjust for demographics and comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion with re-revision was higher in the younger cohort compared to the older (8.1 versus 5.4%, P < 0.001). The ten-year survivorship free of all-cause re-revision was 90.2% (95% CI [confidence interval]: 89.7 to 90.7) in the younger cohort versus 93.7% (95% CI: 93.4 to 94.1) in the older cohort (P < 0.0001). Younger age was significantly associated with a higher adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause re-revision (HR: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.3 to 1.6), as were men (HR: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.2 to 1.5) and initial revision for instability (HR: 1.3, 95% CI: 1.1 to 1.5). In a subgroup analysis of patients aged < 65 years, a 5-year decrease in age was associated with a 10.0% increase in risk of re-revision. Indications for re-revisions differed among the younger and older cohorts (P < 0.01): infection (30.2 versus 34.9%), aseptic loosening (19.0 versus 15.8%), and instability (12.2 versus 12.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Younger age, men, and initial revision performed for instability were associated with significantly increased risk for all-cause re-revision following aseptic rTKA. Notably, age may have a continuous effect on re-revision rates, as each 5-year decrease in age was associated with a 10% increase in risk of re-revision. Future research may further elucidate these increased risks in this younger patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142649663","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Non-Opioid Analgesia Protocols after Total Hip Arthroplasty and Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Updated Scoping Review and Meta-Analysis. 全髋关节置换术和全膝关节置换术后的非阿片类镇痛方案:最新范围界定综述和元分析。
IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.013
Albert D Mousad, Pravarut Nithagon, Andrew R Grant, Henry Yu, Ruijia Niu, Eric L Smith

Background: Despite their effectiveness in postoperative analgesia regimens for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA), opioid medications are accompanied by well-known side effects and a risk of long-term dependence. These drawbacks have prompted the exploration of opioid-free analgesia protocols. The purpose of this study was to summarize the nature and extent of evidence available on opioid-free analgesia protocols in THA and TKA management.

Methods: A scoping review of all Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL-indexed studies published between March 2019 and May 2023 was conducted, focusing on opioid-free analgesia regimens following THA and TKA. All included studies were assessed for potential risk of bias. Meta-analyses of pooled opioid-free percentages and pain scores were conducted using odds ratio and standardized mean difference, respectively, in a random-effects model.

Results: A total of 23 studies (15 TKA, 8 THA) were included. Among both TKA and THA, rescue opioids were the most commonly reported postoperative intervention. The most commonly investigated non-opioid analgesic modality was local anesthetics/nerve blocks with 52.2% (12 of 23) of the studies, followed by multimodal combinations (21.7%) and intravenous corticosteroids (13.0%). Only two of the ten included TKA randomized controlled studies (RCTs) demonstrated statistically significant increases in the postoperative opioid-free rates. Of the six included THA RCTs, four demonstrated significant increases in patients completing the postoperative period opioid-free. Our meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significant impact of nerve blocks following TKA on the opioid-free rate and postoperative pain scores. Among the included THA studies, all studies in which patients received postoperative intravenous corticosteroids demonstrated significant increases in opioid-free percentage.

Conclusion: Despite some non-opioid analgesics demonstrating promise, rescue opioids remained the most frequently employed postoperative pain medication. The optimized opioid-free analgesic regimen likely requires a multimodal approach, especially utilizing both local anesthetics/nerve blocks and intravenous corticosteroids. Further investigation and reporting of opioid-free episodes of care are needed.

背景:尽管阿片类药物在全膝关节置换术(TKA)和全髋关节置换术(THA)的术后镇痛方案中非常有效,但其副作用和长期依赖的风险也是众所周知的。这些缺点促使人们开始探索不含阿片类药物的镇痛方案。本研究旨在总结 THA 和 TKA 治疗中不使用阿片类药物镇痛方案的证据的性质和范围:对 2019 年 3 月至 2023 年 5 月间发表的所有 Medline、Embase 和 CENTRAL 索引的研究进行了范围界定,重点关注 THA 和 TKA 术后无阿片类药物镇痛方案。对所有纳入的研究进行了潜在偏倚风险评估。在随机效应模型中,分别使用几率比和标准化平均差对无阿片类药物百分比和疼痛评分进行了汇总元分析:共纳入 23 项研究(15 项 TKA,8 项 THA)。在 TKA 和 THA 中,阿片类药物治疗是最常见的术后干预措施。最常研究的非阿片类镇痛方式是局部麻醉/神经阻滞,占研究总数的 52.2%(23 项研究中占 12 项),其次是多模式联合镇痛(21.7%)和静脉注射皮质类固醇(13.0%)。在纳入的 10 项 TKA 随机对照研究(RCT)中,只有两项研究表明术后无阿片类药物使用率有显著的统计学增长。在纳入的六项 THA 随机对照研究中,有四项研究表明,术后无阿片类药物依赖的患者人数明显增加。我们的荟萃分析表明,TKA 术后神经阻滞对无阿片类药物使用率和术后疼痛评分的影响具有统计学意义。在纳入的 THA 研究中,所有患者术后静脉注射皮质类固醇的研究均显示无阿片类药物比例显著增加:结论:尽管一些非阿片类镇痛药显示出良好的前景,但阿片类药物仍是最常用的术后镇痛药物。优化无阿片类镇痛方案可能需要采用多模式方法,特别是同时使用局部麻醉剂/神经阻滞剂和静脉皮质类固醇。我们需要进一步调查和报告无阿片类药物护理的情况。
{"title":"Non-Opioid Analgesia Protocols after Total Hip Arthroplasty and Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Updated Scoping Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Albert D Mousad, Pravarut Nithagon, Andrew R Grant, Henry Yu, Ruijia Niu, Eric L Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite their effectiveness in postoperative analgesia regimens for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA), opioid medications are accompanied by well-known side effects and a risk of long-term dependence. These drawbacks have prompted the exploration of opioid-free analgesia protocols. The purpose of this study was to summarize the nature and extent of evidence available on opioid-free analgesia protocols in THA and TKA management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review of all Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL-indexed studies published between March 2019 and May 2023 was conducted, focusing on opioid-free analgesia regimens following THA and TKA. All included studies were assessed for potential risk of bias. Meta-analyses of pooled opioid-free percentages and pain scores were conducted using odds ratio and standardized mean difference, respectively, in a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 23 studies (15 TKA, 8 THA) were included. Among both TKA and THA, rescue opioids were the most commonly reported postoperative intervention. The most commonly investigated non-opioid analgesic modality was local anesthetics/nerve blocks with 52.2% (12 of 23) of the studies, followed by multimodal combinations (21.7%) and intravenous corticosteroids (13.0%). Only two of the ten included TKA randomized controlled studies (RCTs) demonstrated statistically significant increases in the postoperative opioid-free rates. Of the six included THA RCTs, four demonstrated significant increases in patients completing the postoperative period opioid-free. Our meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significant impact of nerve blocks following TKA on the opioid-free rate and postoperative pain scores. Among the included THA studies, all studies in which patients received postoperative intravenous corticosteroids demonstrated significant increases in opioid-free percentage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite some non-opioid analgesics demonstrating promise, rescue opioids remained the most frequently employed postoperative pain medication. The optimized opioid-free analgesic regimen likely requires a multimodal approach, especially utilizing both local anesthetics/nerve blocks and intravenous corticosteroids. Further investigation and reporting of opioid-free episodes of care are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142649667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient and Surgical Factors Associated with Long-term Mortality Outcomes up to Fifteen Years after Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: An Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Study. 与全髋关节和膝关节置换术后十五年内长期死亡率结果相关的患者和手术因素:澳大利亚骨科协会全国关节置换登记研究》。
IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.012
Yushy Zhou, Andrew Fraval, Christopher J Vertullo, Peivao Du, Sina Babazadeh, Jarrad Stevens

Background: Mortality rates following total hip (THA) and total knee (TKA) arthroplasty display distinct temporal patterns, often attributed to patient selection bias, perioperative optimization, and co-morbidities. Understanding these mortality patterns is essential for epidemiological and health-economic longitudinal modeling.

Methods: We conducted a national registry-based cohort study in Australia using data from 1999 to 2022, examining primary and revision THA and TKA procedures for osteoarthritis. We assessed patient factors (age, sex, body mass index [BMI], American Society of Anaesthesiologists [ASA] score), and surgical factors (procedure, fixation, bearing surface, implant volume) in relation to long-term mortality. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated by comparing observed and expected deaths based on national mortality rates.

Results: Our study included 540,181 THA and 880,036 TKA procedures. Temporal trends in mortality rates were observed, with a reduction in mortality rate observed up to seven years for both primary THA and primary TKA after the index procedure and an increased mortality rate observed thereafter. All patient factors were associated with differences in mortality rates, with younger (age range 45 to 49 years) patients for primary TKA demonstrating the strongest association with mortality excess (15 years; SMR 2.02; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.66 to 2.46). Revision procedures were associated with higher mortality rates compared to their respective primary procedures at all time points.

Discussion: Our study finds non-causal associations between patient and surgical factors and mortality up to fifteen years following THA and TKA for osteoarthritis in Australia. These findings are crucial for calibrating epidemiological and economic models and enhancing the precision of longitudinal outcome predictions for arthroplasty patients. While limitations exist, our study informs clinical practice, healthcare policies, and future research in arthroplasty surgery on a national scale, with potential relevance to similar populations worldwide.

背景:全髋(THA)和全膝(TKA)关节置换术后的死亡率显示出不同的时间模式,通常归因于患者选择偏差、围手术期优化和并发症。了解这些死亡率模式对于流行病学和健康经济纵向建模至关重要:我们在澳大利亚开展了一项基于国家登记的队列研究,使用了 1999 年至 2022 年的数据,检查了骨关节炎的初次和翻修 THA 和 TKA 手术。我们评估了与长期死亡率相关的患者因素(年龄、性别、体重指数[BMI]、美国麻醉医师协会[ASA]评分)和手术因素(手术、固定、承托面、植入物体积)。通过比较基于全国死亡率的观察死亡率和预期死亡率,计算出标准化死亡率(SMR):我们的研究包括 540,181 例 THA 和 880,036 例 TKA 手术。我们观察到了死亡率的时间趋势,在指数手术后的七年内,初级THA和初级TKA的死亡率都有所下降,而在此之后,死亡率则有所上升。所有患者因素都与死亡率的差异有关,接受初次 TKA 的年轻患者(年龄在 45 岁至 49 岁之间)与死亡率过高的关系最为密切(15 年;SMR 2.02;95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.66 至 2.46)。与各自的初次手术相比,翻修手术在所有时间点的死亡率都较高:我们的研究发现,在澳大利亚,患者和手术因素与骨关节炎THA和TKA术后长达15年的死亡率之间存在非因果关系。这些发现对于校准流行病学和经济学模型以及提高关节置换术患者纵向结果预测的准确性至关重要。虽然存在局限性,但我们的研究为全国范围内关节置换手术的临床实践、医疗保健政策和未来研究提供了参考,并对全球类似人群具有潜在的借鉴意义。
{"title":"Patient and Surgical Factors Associated with Long-term Mortality Outcomes up to Fifteen Years after Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: An Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Study.","authors":"Yushy Zhou, Andrew Fraval, Christopher J Vertullo, Peivao Du, Sina Babazadeh, Jarrad Stevens","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mortality rates following total hip (THA) and total knee (TKA) arthroplasty display distinct temporal patterns, often attributed to patient selection bias, perioperative optimization, and co-morbidities. Understanding these mortality patterns is essential for epidemiological and health-economic longitudinal modeling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a national registry-based cohort study in Australia using data from 1999 to 2022, examining primary and revision THA and TKA procedures for osteoarthritis. We assessed patient factors (age, sex, body mass index [BMI], American Society of Anaesthesiologists [ASA] score), and surgical factors (procedure, fixation, bearing surface, implant volume) in relation to long-term mortality. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated by comparing observed and expected deaths based on national mortality rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study included 540,181 THA and 880,036 TKA procedures. Temporal trends in mortality rates were observed, with a reduction in mortality rate observed up to seven years for both primary THA and primary TKA after the index procedure and an increased mortality rate observed thereafter. All patient factors were associated with differences in mortality rates, with younger (age range 45 to 49 years) patients for primary TKA demonstrating the strongest association with mortality excess (15 years; SMR 2.02; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.66 to 2.46). Revision procedures were associated with higher mortality rates compared to their respective primary procedures at all time points.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our study finds non-causal associations between patient and surgical factors and mortality up to fifteen years following THA and TKA for osteoarthritis in Australia. These findings are crucial for calibrating epidemiological and economic models and enhancing the precision of longitudinal outcome predictions for arthroplasty patients. While limitations exist, our study informs clinical practice, healthcare policies, and future research in arthroplasty surgery on a national scale, with potential relevance to similar populations worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142649669","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Alarmingly High Rates of Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism Following Closed Reduction for Dislocated Total Hip Arthroplasty. 脱位全髋关节置换术闭合复位术后深静脉血栓形成和肺栓塞的发生率高得惊人。
IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.020
Sagar Telang, Elizabeth Abe, Benjamin Miltenberg, Eric B Smith, Yale Fillingham, Jay R Lieberman, Nathanael D Heckmann

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) and dislocation are well-described complications following total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the relationship between THA dislocation and VTE remains unclear. This study sought to determine the risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients who experience a hip dislocation and subsequent closed reduction following primary THA.

Methods: All primary THA patients were identified in an inpatient admissions database. The THA patients who had a dislocation within 90 days of surgery who were treated with closed reduction were compared to patients who did not dislocate within 90 days of surgery. Differences in patient demographics, comorbidities, hospital characteristics, postoperative chemoprophylactic agents, and 90-day postoperative infectious rates were calculated between cohorts. Univariate and multivariable regression were used to assess the impact of THA dislocation treated with closed reduction on 90-day DVT and PE risk.

Results: There were 550,208 primary THAs identified. Of these patients, 3,700 (0.7%) experienced a dislocation within 90 days, of which 2,487 (67.2%) were treated with closed reduction. Patients who dislocated and underwent closed reduction had increased rates of PE (0.9 versus 0.3%, P < 0.001) and DVT (1.6 versus 0.5%, P < 0.001) compared to patients who did not dislocate. After controlling for confounding factors, patients in the closed reduction group had elevated risks of both DVT (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.5, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8 to 3.4, P < 0.001) and PE (aOR 2.2, 95% CI: 1.4 to 3.3, P < 0.001).

Discussion: Patients who undergo closed reduction for dislocation following primary THA have an alarmingly high risk of DVT and PE. These findings should prompt surgeons to consider chemoprophylaxis among patients who experience a dislocation, even when treated with a closed reduction.

背景:静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)和脱位是全髋关节置换术(THA)后并发症的典型表现。然而,THA脱位与VTE之间的关系仍不清楚。本研究旨在确定初治髋关节置换术后发生髋关节脱位并随后进行闭合复位的患者发生深静脉血栓(DVT)和肺栓塞(PE)的风险:方法:从住院病人入院数据库中识别所有初级 THA 患者。将手术后 90 天内脱位并接受闭合复位治疗的 THA 患者与手术后 90 天内未脱位的患者进行比较。计算了各组患者在人口统计学、合并症、医院特征、术后化学药物和术后90天感染率方面的差异。采用单变量和多变量回归评估了采用闭合复位术治疗的THA脱位对90天深静脉血栓和血小板增多症风险的影响:结果:共确定了 550,208 例初次 THA。在这些患者中,有3700人(0.7%)在90天内发生脱位,其中2487人(67.2%)接受了闭合复位治疗。与没有脱臼的患者相比,脱臼并接受闭合复位术的患者发生 PE(0.9% 对 0.3%,P < 0.001)和深静脉血栓(1.6% 对 0.5%,P < 0.001)的比例更高。在控制了混杂因素后,闭合复位组患者发生深静脉血栓的风险较高(调整赔率 [aOR] 2.5,95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.8 至 3.4,P < 0.001):讨论:讨论:原发性 THA 后因脱位接受闭合复位术的患者发生深静脉血栓和 PE 的风险高得惊人。这些发现应促使外科医生考虑对发生脱位的患者进行化学预防,即使是接受闭合复位术的患者。
{"title":"Alarmingly High Rates of Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism Following Closed Reduction for Dislocated Total Hip Arthroplasty.","authors":"Sagar Telang, Elizabeth Abe, Benjamin Miltenberg, Eric B Smith, Yale Fillingham, Jay R Lieberman, Nathanael D Heckmann","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.020","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) and dislocation are well-described complications following total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the relationship between THA dislocation and VTE remains unclear. This study sought to determine the risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients who experience a hip dislocation and subsequent closed reduction following primary THA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All primary THA patients were identified in an inpatient admissions database. The THA patients who had a dislocation within 90 days of surgery who were treated with closed reduction were compared to patients who did not dislocate within 90 days of surgery. Differences in patient demographics, comorbidities, hospital characteristics, postoperative chemoprophylactic agents, and 90-day postoperative infectious rates were calculated between cohorts. Univariate and multivariable regression were used to assess the impact of THA dislocation treated with closed reduction on 90-day DVT and PE risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 550,208 primary THAs identified. Of these patients, 3,700 (0.7%) experienced a dislocation within 90 days, of which 2,487 (67.2%) were treated with closed reduction. Patients who dislocated and underwent closed reduction had increased rates of PE (0.9 versus 0.3%, P < 0.001) and DVT (1.6 versus 0.5%, P < 0.001) compared to patients who did not dislocate. After controlling for confounding factors, patients in the closed reduction group had elevated risks of both DVT (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.5, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8 to 3.4, P < 0.001) and PE (aOR 2.2, 95% CI: 1.4 to 3.3, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Patients who undergo closed reduction for dislocation following primary THA have an alarmingly high risk of DVT and PE. These findings should prompt surgeons to consider chemoprophylaxis among patients who experience a dislocation, even when treated with a closed reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142649734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Value-Based Care in Arthroplasty: Where Are We Headed, and What Is Holding Us Back? 关节置换术中的价值导向医疗:我们将何去何从,是什么阻碍了我们?
IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.023
Ronald E Delanois, Zeev N Kain, Giles R Scuderi, Michael A Mont
{"title":"Value-Based Care in Arthroplasty: Where Are We Headed, and What Is Holding Us Back?","authors":"Ronald E Delanois, Zeev N Kain, Giles R Scuderi, Michael A Mont","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.023","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.023","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142640246","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ways to Use Social Media to Enhance Your Practice and Career: A Young Arthroplasty Group Editorial. 使用社交媒体提升您的实践和职业生涯的方法:青年关节成形术小组社论。
IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.009
Alexandra S Gabrielli, David C Landy, Jenna Bernstein
{"title":"Ways to Use Social Media to Enhance Your Practice and Career: A Young Arthroplasty Group Editorial.","authors":"Alexandra S Gabrielli, David C Landy, Jenna Bernstein","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.009","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142645060","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Arthroplasty
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1