Seminars in Vascular Surgery最新文献

“Acute venous problems” refers to a group of disorders that affect the veins and result in sudden and severe symptoms. They can be classified based on the pathological triggering mechanisms, such as thrombosis and/or mechanical compression, and their consequences, including symptoms, signs, and complications. The management and therapeutic approach depend on the severity of the disease, the location, and the involvement of the vein segment.

Although summarizing these conditions can be challenging, the objective of this narrative review was to provide an overview of the most common acute venous problems. This will include an exhaustive yet concise and practical description of each condition. The multidisciplinary approach remains one of the major advantages in dealing with these conditions, maximizing the results and the prevention of complications.

Hemodynamic complications frequently affect vascular access and are important causes of morbidity and mortality. We present a review of acute complications affecting vascular accesses, focusing on classical and new treatments. Acute complications in hemodialysis vascular access are often underestimated and undertreated, and can present a challenge for both vascular surgeons and anesthesiologists. Accordingly, we considered different anesthesiologic approaches to both hemorrhagic and nonhemorrhagic patients. A strict collaboration among nephrologists, surgeons, and anesthesiologists can potentially improve prevention and management of acute complications and quality of life.

Major nontraumatic lower extremity amputation (LEA) is a morbid complication of longstanding or poorly controlled diabetes and/or end-stage peripheral artery disease. Incidence of major LEAs consistently declined during the 1990s and 2000s, but rates have plateaued or increased in many regions during the past decade. Marked racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and geographic disparities in risk of LEA persist and are related to inequalities in access to care and differential rates of attempted limb preservation. Multidisciplinary diabetic foot care (MDFC) is increasingly recognized as a necessary model for optimal management of patients with diabetic foot and vascular disease. This article reviews the role of MDFC in reducing major LEAs and the specific ways in which MDFC can mitigate disparities in care delivery and limb preservation outcomes. Access to MDFC among vulnerable populations remains a significant barrier to systematic reduction in major LEAs.

Frailty is defined as a state of decreased physiologic reserve contributing to functional decline and adverse outcomes. Racial disparities in frail patients have been described sparsely in the literature. We aimed to assess whether race influences frailty status in geriatric patients undergoing revascularization for peripheral artery disease (PAD) with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). A 5-year analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database included all geriatric (65 years and older) patients who underwent revascularization for lower extremity PAD with CLTI. The frailty index was calculated using a 11-variable modified frailty index and a cutoff of 0.27 indicated frail status. The primary outcome was an association of race or ethnicity with frailty status. We included 7,837 geriatric patients who underwent a surgical procedure (open: 55.2%) for PAD with CLTI. Mean age of patients was 75.4 years, 63.8% were male, 24.1% (n = 1,889) were frail, and 21.8% (n = 1,710) were African American (AA). Overall complication rate was 11.2% (n = 909) and overall mortality rate was 1.9% (n = 148). AA patients were more likely to be frail than White patients (29.6% v 23.9%; P = .03). AA and Hispanic patients were more likely to have complications (P = .03 and P = .001) and require readmission (P = .015 and P = .001) compared with White and non-Hispanic patients, respectively. Frail AA and frail Hispanic patients were more likely to have 30-day complications and readmission compared with frail White and frail non-Hispanic patients, respectively. Race and ethnicity influence frailty status in geriatric patients with PAD and CLTI. These disparities exist regardless of age, sex, comorbid conditions, and type of operative procedure. Additional studies are needed to highlight disparities by race and ethnicity to identify potentially modifiable risk factors to improve outcomes.

The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly affected health care delivery. In addition to the significant morbidity and mortality associated with acute illness from COVID-19, the indirect impact has been far-reaching, including substantial disruptions in chronic disease care. As a result of pandemic disruptions in health care, vulnerable and minority populations have faced health inequalities. The aim of this review was to investigate how the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted vulnerable populations with limb-threatening peripheral artery disease and diabetic foot infections.

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) has been associated with poorer outcomes based on particular social determinants of health, including insurance status. A unique population to study treatment outcomes related to PAD is those with dual-eligible status—those who qualify for both Medicare and Medicaid—comprising more than 12 million people. We performed a systematic review of the literature surrounding dual-eligible patients and impact on PAD, with final inclusion of six articles. Dual eligibility has been associated with higher rates of comorbidities; more severe symptoms at initial presentation for PAD; and poorer treatment outcomes, including mortality. Further studies are needed to specifically look at the association between PAD and dual-eligible status, but what is clear is that patients in this population would benefit from early identification to prevent disease progression and improve equity.

The objective of this study was to assess the overall differences in the standard of preventive foot care for patients at risk of diabetic foot ulceration and to identify specific demographic factors affecting these health care practices, including race and ethnicity. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data for 2011 to 2018 were analyzed. Participants (20 years and older) with diabetes were categorized as White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, and others (including multiracial participants) based on self-reported race and ethnicity. The primary outcome was foot examination over the past year administered by a medical professional. Logistic regression was performed to examine the effects of race and ethnicity on the annual diabetic foot examination, controlling for age (65 years and older), gender, and health insurance status. Among the 2,836 participants included in the study (weighted percentage: 61.1% were White, 13.9% were Black, 15.1% were Hispanic, 5.4% were Asian, and 4.5% were other), 2,018 (weighted percentage: 71.6%) received annual diabetic foot examination over the past year. Hispanic participants (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.685; 95% CI, 0.52–0.90) were significantly less likely than White participants to receive an annual foot examination (Black participants: aOR = 1.11; 95% CI, 0.83–1.49; Asian participants: aOR = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.60–1.07; other participants: aOR = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.40–1.10). Factors associated with receipt of foot examination were age 65 years or older (aOR = 1.42; 95% CI, 1.05–1.92) and having health insurance (aOR = 3.02; 95% CI, 2.27–4.03). Our findings suggest that Hispanic adults with diabetes are receiving disproportionately lower rates of preventive foot care compared with their White counterparts. This significant variation in the standard of care for individuals with diabetes reflects the need to further identify factors driving the disparities in preventive foot care services among racial and ethnic minority groups.

Community-engaged research (CEnR) is a powerful tool to create sustainable and effective change in health outcomes. CEnR engages community members as equal partners, amplifying their voices and priorities by including them throughout the research process. Such engagement increases the relevance and meaning of research, improves the translation of research findings into sustainable health policy and practice, and ultimately enhances mutual trust among academic, clinical, and community partners for ongoing research partnership. There are a number of key principles that must be considered in the planning, design, and implementation of CEnR. These principles are focused on inclusive representation and participation, community empowerment, building community capacity, and protecting community self-determination. Although vascular surgeons may not be equipped to address these issues from the ground up by themselves, they should work with a team who can help them incorporate these elements into their CEnR project designs and proposals. This may be best accomplished by collaborating with researchers and community-based organizations who already have this expertise and have established social capital within the community. This article describes the theory and principles of CEnR, its relevance to vascular surgeons, researchers, and patients, and how using CEnR principles in vascular surgery practice, research, and outreach can benefit our patient population, with a specific focus on reducing disparities related to amputation.

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia represents the morbid end stage of severe peripheral artery disease, with significant impact on patient quality of life. Early diagnosis of arterial insufficiency and referral for vascular intervention are essential for successful limb salvage. Disparate outcomes have been reported among patients residing in rural areas due to decreased access to care. Remote telemedicine outreach programs represent an opportunity to improve access to care in these rural communities. Establishment of a telehealth program requires identification of communities most in need of specialty care. After locating an ideal site, collaboration with local providers is necessary to develop a program that meets the specific needs of providers and patients. Surgeon guidance in development of screening and management algorithms ensures that patients obtain care reliably and with adjustments as needed to suit the referring provider, the patient, and the specialist. Telehealth evaluations can limit the financial burden associated with travel, while ensuring access to higher levels of care than are available in the patients’ immediate area. Multiple barriers to telehealth exist. These include limited reimbursement, local provider resistance to new referral patterns, lack of in-person interaction and evaluation, and the inability to do a physical examination. Improved reimbursement models have made telehealth feasible, although care must be taken to ensure that practice patterns complement existing resources and are designed in a way that omits the need for in-person evaluation until the time of specialist intervention. Telemedicine is an underused tool in the arsenal of vascular surgeons. Targeted telehealth programs aid in increasing patient access to expert-level care, thereby improving health disparities that exist in rural populations.