Seminars in Vascular Surgery最新文献

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) consists of a group of disorders resulting from compression of the neurovascular bundle exiting through the thoracic outlet. TOS can be classified as follows based on the etiology of the pathophysiology: neurogenic TOS, venous TOS, arterial TOS, and mixed TOS. The constellation of symptoms a patient may experience varies, depending on the structures involved. Due to the wide range of etiologies and presenting symptoms, treatments for TOS also differ. Furthermore, most studies focus on the perioperative and short-term outcomes after surgical decompression for TOS. This systematic review aimed to provide a pooled analysis of studies to better understand the intermediate and long-term outcomes of surgical decompression for TOS. We conducted a systematic literature search in the Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar databases for studies that analyzed long-term outcomes after surgical decompression for TOS. The inclusion period was from January 2015 to May 2023. The primary outcome was postoperative QuickDASH Outcome Measure scores. A total of 16 studies were included in the final analysis. The differences between postoperative and preoperative QuickDASH Outcome Measure scores were calculated, when possible, and there was a mean overall difference of 33.5 points (95% CI, 25.2–41.8; P = .001) after surgical decompression. There was a higher proportion of excellent outcomes reported for patients undergoing intervention for arterial and mixed TOS etiologies, whereas those with venous and neurogenic etiologies had the lowest proportion of excellent outcomes reported. Patients with neurogenic TOS had the highest proportion of poor outcomes reported. In conclusion, surgical decompression for TOS has favorable long-term outcomes, especially in patients with arterial and mixed etiologies.

Pectoralis minor syndrome (PMS) and quadrilateral space syndrome (QSS) are uncommon neurovascular compression disorders affecting the upper extremity. PMS involves compression under the pectoralis minor muscle, and QSS results from compression in the quadrilateral space—both are classically observed in overhead-motion athletes. Diagnosing PMS and QSS may be challenging due to variable presentations and similarities with other, more common, upper-limb pathologies. Although there is no gold standard diagnostic, local analgesic muscle-block response in a patient with the appropriate clinical context is often all that is required for an accurate diagnosis after excluding more common etiologies. Treatment ranges from conservative physical therapy to decompressive surgery, which is reserved for refractory cases or severe, acute vascular presentations. Decompression generally yields favorable outcomes, with most patients experiencing significant relief and restored baseline function. In conclusion, PMS and QSS, although rare, can cause debilitating upper-extremity symptoms; accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment offer excellent outcomes, alleviating pain and disability.

The goal of this systematic review was to collate and summarize the current literature on hemodialysis access outcomes in females, identify differences between females and men, and provide a foundation for future research. A systematic review of the English-language literature was conducted by searching PubMed and Google Scholar for the following terms: “sex,” “hemodialysis access,” “arteriovenous fistula,” “arteriovenous graft,” and “dialysis catheter.” Reference lists from the resulting articles were also evaluated to ensure that any and all relevant primary sources were identified. Studies were then screened by two independent reviewers for inclusion. Of 967 total studies, 53 ultimately met inclusion criteria. Females have lower maturation rates; have decreased rates of primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency; require more procedures per capita to achieve maturation and to maintain fistula patency; are more likely to receive dialysis via an arteriovenous graft or central venous catheter; and require a longer time and potentially more assistive invasive interventions to achieve a mature fistula. Our findings emphasize the urgent need for further research to evaluate and address the causes of these disparities. Discussion with patients undergoing hemodialysis should include these findings to improve patient education, expectations, satisfaction, and outcomes.

Sex-based outcome studies have consistently documented worse results for females undergoing care for abdominal aortic aneurysms. This review explores the underlying factors that account for worse outcomes in the females sex. A scoping review of studies reporting sex-based disparities on abdominal aortic aneurysms was performed. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. Factors that account for worse outcomes in the females sex were identified, grouped into themes, and analyzed. Key findings of each study are reported and a comprehensive framework of these factors is presented. A total of 35 studies were identified as critical in highlighting sex-based disparities in care of patients with aortic aneurysms. We identified the following 10 interrelated themes in the chain of aneurysm care that account for differential outcomes in females: natural history, risk factors, pathobiology, biomechanics, screening, morphology, device design and adherence to instructions for use, technique, trial enrollment, and social determinants. Factors accounting for worse outcomes in the care of females with aortic aneurysms were identified and described. Some factors are immediately actionable, such as screening criteria, whereas device design improvement will require further research and development. This comprehensive framework of factors affecting care of aneurysms in females should serve as a blueprint to develop education, outreach, and future research efforts to improve outcomes in females.

Venous compression syndromes have been described, yet the role of sex is poorly understood. Although iliac vein compression has been discussed more often with the advent of newer technologies, research has fallen short on defining epidemiology, best practices for evaluation and treatment, and differences in responses to treatment between men and females. The authors report on iliac vein compression, nonthrombotic renal vein compression, and other venous compression syndromes in females. Literature searches of PubMed were performed using the following keywords: females/females and May Thurner, venous stenting, venous outcomes, deep venous disease, deep venous compression, venous stenting, renal vein compression, renal vein surgery/stent, popliteal vein entrapment, venous thoracic vein entrapment, and popliteal vein entrapment. The articles prompted the authors to research further as the referenced articles were reviewed. Sex representation has not been addressed adequately in the research of venous compression syndromes, making the discussion of best treatment options and long-term outcomes difficult. More specific understanding of epidemiology and response to interventions will only come from research that addresses these issues directly, understanding that some of these syndromes occur rarely.

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is the leading cause of death in the United States and worldwide. Medical management of known modifiable risk factors, such as dyslipidemia, hypertension, and diabetes, is a key aspect to its treatment. Unfortunately, there are substantial sex-based differences in the treatment of ASCVD that result in poor medical management and worse clinical outcomes. The objective of this systematic review was to summarize known disparities in the medical management of ASCVD in females. We included prior studies with specific sex- and sex-based analyses regarding the medical treatment of the following three major disease entities within ASCVD: cerebrovascular disease, coronary artery disease, and peripheral artery disease. A total of 43 articles met inclusion criteria. In our analysis, we found that females were less likely to receive appropriate treatment of dyslipidemia or be prescribed antithrombotic medications. However, treatment differences for diabetes and hypertension by sex were not as clearly represented in the included studies. In addition to rectifying these disparities in the medical management of ASCVD, this systematic review highlights the need to address larger issues, such as underrepresentation of females in clinical trials, decreased access to care, and underdiagnosis of ASCVD to improve overall care for females.

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is on the rise, with a growing prevalence in an aging population and increasing rates of diabetes. Chronic limb-threatening ischemia poses a significant risk of limb loss. PAD is common in females, particularly after menopause, with a 35% prevalence rate in females older than 65 years. Studies have suggested that females have inferior outcomes compared with men after endovascular revascularization for PAD. With the rising utilization of endovascular interventions for the treatment of PAD, we sought to perform a review of sex-based outcomes of peripheral endovascular interventions for the treatment of symptomatic PAD. A scoping literature review was conducted to evaluate outcomes in females patients undergoing endovascular peripheral interventions for PAD. Eligibility criteria included studies focusing on adult females with lifestyle-limiting claudication or chronic limb-threatening ischemia who underwent endovascular intervention. Various endovascular procedures were considered and outcomes of interest included mortality, amputations, reinterventions, bleeding complications, and major adverse cardiac events. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Sixteen studies were included in the review. Females patients undergoing endovascular interventions were associated with bleeding complications, higher rates of reintervention, and a risk of nonfatal strokes. However, females sex was not linked to higher rates of amputation or conclusively higher mortality rates post intervention. The comprehensive scoping review reveals important sex-related disparities in outcomes after endovascular procedures for symptomatic PAD. Females patients have been reported to experience worse outcomes in terms of reinterventions and bleeding complications. These findings emphasize the need for future trials focusing specifically on females patients to develop sex-inclusive treatment recommendations for advanced PAD.

Thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms are more common in men. Yet, females often have worse outcomes, fewer interventions, and lower treatment rates. Females have also benefited less from the research and treatment of those diseases than men. Understanding sex- and sex-specific differences in thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms can improve care delivery, reduce disparities, and optimize outcomes for females with thoracic aortic aneurysms and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. The authors reviewed the literature on the presentation and outcomes of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in females, discussing the existing gaps and future directions to address them.

Rare vascular conditions frequently pose a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma for health care providers. Several of these conditions have distinct relevance to females populations but, due to their infrequency, there has been little reported on the outcomes of rare vascular conditions specifically in females populations. We performed a literature review of a selection of three rare vascular conditions known to either disproportionately affect females (median arcuate ligament syndrome and fibromuscular dysplasia) or have unique manifestations in females populations (vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome). We performed a descriptive review of the literature focused on these three vascular conditions and identified aspects of the current available research describing sex-based differences in prevalence, any pathophysiology explaining the observed sex-based differences, and the contribution of sex to outcomes for each disease process. In addition, considerations for pregnant females with respect to each rare vascular disease process are discussed.