Despite advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of infective endocarditis (IE), the burden of IE has remained relatively high over the past decade. With an ageing population and an increasing proportion of healthcare-associated IE, the epidemiology of IE has undergone significant changes. Staphylococcus aureus has evolved as the most common causative microorganism, even in most low- and middle-income countries. Several imaging modalities and novel microbiological tests have emerged to facilitate the diagnosis of IE. Outpatient parenteral antibiotic treatment and oral step-down antibiotic treatment have become new trends for the management of IE. Early surgical intervention, particularly within seven days, should be considered in cases of IE with appropriate surgical indications. We comprehensively review the updated epidemiology, microbiology, diagnosis, and management of IE.
{"title":"Update on the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of infective endocarditis: A review","authors":"Huanhuan Miao, Yuhui Zhang, Yuqing Zhang, Jian Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.tcm.2024.01.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tcm.2024.01.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><span>Despite advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of infective endocarditis<span> (IE), the burden of IE has remained relatively high over the past decade. With an ageing population and an increasing proportion of healthcare-associated IE, the epidemiology of IE has undergone significant changes. </span></span><span><span>Staphylococcus aureus</span></span><span> has evolved as the most common causative microorganism, even in most low- and middle-income countries. Several imaging modalities and novel microbiological tests have emerged to facilitate the diagnosis of IE. Outpatient parenteral antibiotic treatment and oral step-down antibiotic treatment have become new trends for the management of IE. Early surgical intervention, particularly within seven days, should be considered in cases of IE with appropriate surgical indications. We comprehensively review the updated epidemiology, microbiology, diagnosis, and management of IE.</span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":51199,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"34 8","pages":"Pages 499-506"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139409436","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2024.03.007
Lisa M Raven
{"title":"Editorial commentary: Understanding the cardiovascular benefits of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists","authors":"Lisa M Raven","doi":"10.1016/j.tcm.2024.03.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tcm.2024.03.007","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51199,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"34 8","pages":"Pages 558-559"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140327380","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-21DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2024.10.003
Mario Mekhael, Ghassan Bidaoui, Austin Falloon, Amitabh C Pandey
Personalized healthcare is becoming increasingly popular given the vast heterogeneity in disease manifestation between individuals. Many commonly encountered diseases within cardiology are multifactorial in nature and disease progression and response is often variable due to environmental and genetic factors influencing disease states. This makes accurate early identification and primary prevention difficult in certain populations, especially young patients with limited Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) risk factors. Newer strategies, such as coronary artery calcium (CAC) scans and polygenic risk scores (PRS), are being implemented to aid in the detection of subclinical disease and heritable risk, respectively. Data surrounding CAC scans have shown promising results in their ability to detect subclinical atherosclerosis and predict the risk of future coronary events, especially at the extremes; however, predictive variability exists among different patient populations, limiting the test's specificity. Furthermore, relying only on CAC scores and ASCVD risk scores may fail to identify a large group of patients needing primary prevention who lack subclinical disease and traditional risk factors, but harbor genetic variabilities strongly associated with certain cardiovascular diseases. PRS can overcome these limitations. These scores can be measured in individuals as early as birth to identify genetic variants placing them at elevated risk for developing cardiovascular disease, irrespective of their current cardiovascular health status. By applying PRS alongside CAC scores, previously overlooked patient populations can be identified and begin primary prevention strategies early to achieve optimal outcomes. In this review, we expand on the current knowledge surrounding CAC scores and PRS and highlight the future possibilities of these technologies for preventive cardiology.
{"title":"Personalization of primary prevention: Exploring the role of coronary artery calcium and polygenic risk score in cardiovascular diseases.","authors":"Mario Mekhael, Ghassan Bidaoui, Austin Falloon, Amitabh C Pandey","doi":"10.1016/j.tcm.2024.10.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tcm.2024.10.003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Personalized healthcare is becoming increasingly popular given the vast heterogeneity in disease manifestation between individuals. Many commonly encountered diseases within cardiology are multifactorial in nature and disease progression and response is often variable due to environmental and genetic factors influencing disease states. This makes accurate early identification and primary prevention difficult in certain populations, especially young patients with limited Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) risk factors. Newer strategies, such as coronary artery calcium (CAC) scans and polygenic risk scores (PRS), are being implemented to aid in the detection of subclinical disease and heritable risk, respectively. Data surrounding CAC scans have shown promising results in their ability to detect subclinical atherosclerosis and predict the risk of future coronary events, especially at the extremes; however, predictive variability exists among different patient populations, limiting the test's specificity. Furthermore, relying only on CAC scores and ASCVD risk scores may fail to identify a large group of patients needing primary prevention who lack subclinical disease and traditional risk factors, but harbor genetic variabilities strongly associated with certain cardiovascular diseases. PRS can overcome these limitations. These scores can be measured in individuals as early as birth to identify genetic variants placing them at elevated risk for developing cardiovascular disease, irrespective of their current cardiovascular health status. By applying PRS alongside CAC scores, previously overlooked patient populations can be identified and begin primary prevention strategies early to achieve optimal outcomes. In this review, we expand on the current knowledge surrounding CAC scores and PRS and highlight the future possibilities of these technologies for preventive cardiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":51199,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142512489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-21DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2024.10.002
Michelle M Kittleson
Optimal guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction comprises the angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (sacubitril/valsartan), an evidence-based beta-blocker (bisoprolol, carvedilol, or sustained-release metoprolol), a mineralocorticoid antagonist (spironolactone or eplerenone), and a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (dapagliflozin or empagliflozin). Optimal guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction comprises a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor with emerging evidence to support the use of a mineralocorticoid antagonist and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. This review will summarize the evidence behind the guideline recommendations, the impact of newer trials on management of patients with HF, and strategies for implementation into clinical practice.
{"title":"Guidelines for treating heart failure.","authors":"Michelle M Kittleson","doi":"10.1016/j.tcm.2024.10.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcm.2024.10.002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Optimal guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction comprises the angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (sacubitril/valsartan), an evidence-based beta-blocker (bisoprolol, carvedilol, or sustained-release metoprolol), a mineralocorticoid antagonist (spironolactone or eplerenone), and a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (dapagliflozin or empagliflozin). Optimal guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction comprises a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor with emerging evidence to support the use of a mineralocorticoid antagonist and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. This review will summarize the evidence behind the guideline recommendations, the impact of newer trials on management of patients with HF, and strategies for implementation into clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":51199,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142512488","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2023.11.001
Hypertension remains the leading international risk factor for cardiovascular disease and premature death but, despite effective treatments, hypertension remains significantly underdiagnosed and undertreated. In the present review paper, we provide a selected update on recent developments of interest in the management of hypertension. We focus on summarizing four topics that we believe are worth highlighting to a clinical audience: (1) the evidence and strong motivation for new lower systolic BP treatment targets; (2) new studies reporting on the efficacy of renal denervation in the management of hypertension; (3) interesting new data to inform the great salt debate; and (4), perhaps most importantly, pioneering new work highlighting the huge potential of multi-disciplinary care in the management of hypertension.
{"title":"Selected highlights in the updated treatment of hypertension","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tcm.2023.11.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tcm.2023.11.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Hypertension remains the leading international risk factor<span> for cardiovascular disease and premature death but, despite effective treatments, hypertension remains significantly underdiagnosed and undertreated. In the present review paper, we provide a selected update on recent developments of interest in the management of hypertension. We focus on summarizing four topics that we believe are worth highlighting to a clinical audience: (1) the evidence and strong motivation for new lower systolic BP<span> treatment targets; (2) new studies reporting on the efficacy of renal denervation in the management of hypertension; (3) interesting new data to inform the great salt debate; and (4), perhaps most importantly, pioneering new work highlighting the huge potential of multi-disciplinary care in the management of hypertension.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":51199,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"34 6","pages":"Pages 416-420"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138048400","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2023.11.004
{"title":"Editorial commentary: Commentary for gender and race-related disparities in the management of ventricular arrhythmias","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tcm.2023.11.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tcm.2023.11.004","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51199,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"34 6","pages":"Pages 387-388"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138464206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2023.07.004
All foreign bodies inserted in the circulatory system are thrombogenic and require temporary or lifelong antithrombotic therapies to prevent thrombosis. The adequate level of anticoagulation during the first few months determines the long-term durability, particularly for mechanical prostheses, and also for biological valves. Suboptimal anticoagulation is the most frequent source of mechanical valve thrombosis (MVT).
The patient's clinical presentation decides how mechanical prosthetic valve obstruction is managed. If the mechanical valve thrombosis is obstructive and the patient is in a critical condition with hemodynamic instability, an immediate surgical intervention should be performed. The thrombolytic treatment is an option for left mechanical valve thrombosis in patients who have high surgical risk and no contraindications and also for right heart valve thrombosis.
In non-obstructive thrombosis on the mechanical valve, patients can be asymptomatic, requiring optimization of the anticoagulant treatment. Both obstructive and non-obstructive thrombus formed on the mechanical prosthesis can result in embolic events. If the thrombus persists following anticoagulant treatment, the recommended options include thrombolytic treatment or redo surgery. Pannus can also cause obstruction of the prosthesis for which surgical treatment is the only option.
While these clinical scenarios may initially appear to have straightforward solutions in terms of surgery, thrombolysis, or effective anticoagulation, real-world clinical experience often proves more complex. For instance, a patient with some usual comorbidities and non-obstructive mechanical valve thrombosis, experiencing symptoms solely by repeated systemic embolizations, might undergo all three therapeutic options due to the unpredictable nature of MVT. Therefore, treatment indications can intersect both on the time axis and depending on the patient's clinical status and the expertise of the center where he is hospitalized. Moreover, the European and American guidelines show subtle but important differences. The aim of this review was to compare these differences, comment on recent studies and evidence gaps, propose a more pragmatic algorithm combining all current recommendations, and highlight important research directions for this disease that has dominated the cardiovascular landscape for more than five decades, but for which there have been no significant recent changes in management.
{"title":"Mechanical valve thrombosis: Current management and differences between guidelines","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tcm.2023.07.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tcm.2023.07.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>All foreign bodies inserted in the </span>circulatory system<span> are thrombogenic and require temporary or lifelong antithrombotic therapies to prevent thrombosis. The adequate level of </span></span>anticoagulation<span> during the first few months determines the long-term durability, particularly for mechanical prostheses, and also for biological valves. Suboptimal anticoagulation is the most frequent source of mechanical valve thrombosis (MVT).</span></p><p><span><span>The patient's clinical presentation decides how mechanical prosthetic valve obstruction is managed. If the mechanical valve thrombosis is obstructive and the patient is in a critical condition with </span>hemodynamic<span> instability, an immediate surgical intervention should be performed. The thrombolytic treatment is an option for left mechanical valve thrombosis in patients who have high surgical risk and no contraindications and also for right </span></span>heart valve thrombosis.</p><p>In non-obstructive thrombosis on the mechanical valve, patients can be asymptomatic, requiring optimization of the anticoagulant treatment<span>. Both obstructive and non-obstructive thrombus<span><span> formed on the mechanical prosthesis can result in embolic events. If the thrombus persists following anticoagulant treatment, the recommended options include </span>thrombolytic<span> treatment or redo surgery. Pannus can also cause obstruction of the prosthesis for which surgical treatment is the only option.</span></span></span></p><p>While these clinical scenarios may initially appear to have straightforward solutions in terms of surgery, thrombolysis<span>, or effective anticoagulation, real-world clinical experience often proves more complex. For instance, a patient with some usual comorbidities and non-obstructive mechanical valve thrombosis, experiencing symptoms solely by repeated systemic embolizations, might undergo all three therapeutic options due to the unpredictable nature of MVT. Therefore, treatment indications can intersect both on the time axis and depending on the patient's clinical status and the expertise of the center where he is hospitalized. Moreover, the European and American guidelines show subtle but important differences. The aim of this review was to compare these differences, comment on recent studies and evidence gaps, propose a more pragmatic algorithm combining all current recommendations, and highlight important research directions for this disease that has dominated the cardiovascular landscape for more than five decades, but for which there have been no significant recent changes in management.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":51199,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"34 6","pages":"Pages 351-359"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9941868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2023.09.003
{"title":"Editorial commentary: The evolution of prosthetic heart valves and related preventative antithrombotic therapy: Different paths with divergent progression","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tcm.2023.09.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tcm.2023.09.003","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51199,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"34 6","pages":"Pages 360-361"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10220617","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号