Pub Date : 2024-08-01DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2023.10.004
Percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO), a common variation of interatrial septum anatomy, is a commonly performed procedure in the catheterization laboratory to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke in selected patients and to treat other PFO-related syndromes. In the last twenty years, disc-based devices have represented the armamentarium of the interventional cardiologist; recently, suture-based devices have become an attractive alternative, despite limited data regarding their long-term performance. The present review gives an overview of the current evidence regarding suture-based PFO closure, the device's characteristics, the echocardiographic evaluation of the PFO anatomy, and recommendations for patient selection. A detailed procedural guide is then provided, and potential complications and future developments in the field are discussed.
{"title":"Percutaneous suture-based patent foramen ovale closure: A state-of-the-art review","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tcm.2023.10.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tcm.2023.10.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO), a common variation of </span>interatrial septum<span><span> anatomy, is a commonly performed procedure in the </span>catheterization laboratory to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke in selected patients and to treat other PFO-related syndromes. In the last twenty years, disc-based devices have represented the armamentarium of the interventional cardiologist; recently, suture-based devices have become an attractive alternative, despite limited data regarding their long-term performance. The present review gives an overview of the current evidence regarding suture-based PFO closure, the device's characteristics, the echocardiographic evaluation of the PFO anatomy, and recommendations for patient selection. A detailed procedural guide is then provided, and potential complications and future developments in the field are discussed.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":51199,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"34 6","pages":"Pages 404-413"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71488654","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2023.04.005
Onyedika J. Ilonze
{"title":"Editorial commentary: Screening for aortic stenosis in at risk older patients – A new paradigm in valvular heart disease care?","authors":"Onyedika J. Ilonze","doi":"10.1016/j.tcm.2023.04.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tcm.2023.04.005","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51199,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"34 5","pages":"Pages 302-303"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9468895","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2023.04.004
Jimmy JH. Kang , Nicholas M. Fialka , Ryaan EL-Andari , Abeline Watkins , Yongzhe Hong , Anoop Mathew , Sabin J. Bozso , Jeevan Nagendran
This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to provide a comprehensive analysis of the literature directly comparing the outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and TAVR in patients with BAV stenosis. Medline, PubMed, and Scopus were systematically searched for articles published between 2000 and 2023, 1862 studies were screened, and 6 retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria. We included 6550 patients in the final analyses: 3,292 and 3,258 in the SAVR and TAVR groups, respectively. Both groups have similar rates of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio (OR) 1.11; 95% CI 0.59–2.10; p = 0.75) and stroke (OR 1.25; 95% CI 0.85–1.86; p = 0.26. Patients who underwent SAVR experienced lower rates of permanent pacemaker implantation (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.35–0.83; p = 0.005) and paravalvular leak (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.26–0.86; p = 0.02). On the other hand, patients who underwent TAVR displayed lower rates of acute kidney injury (OR 1.81; 95% CI 1.15–2.84; p = 0.010), major bleeding (OR 3.76; 95% CI 2.18–6.49; p < 0.00001), and pulmonary complications (OR 7.68; 95% CI 1.21–48.84; p = 0.03). Despite the early mortality data suggesting that TAVR may be a reasonable strategy for patients with bicuspid AS with low to intermediate surgical risk, the increased risk of PPI and PVL is concerning. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial reporting long-term outcomes with pre-defined subgroup analyses based on BAV morphology is paramount. In the interim, caution should be exercised in the widespread adoption of TAVR in lower surgical-risk patients.
本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在对直接比较主动脉瓣狭窄患者手术主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)和TAVR疗效的文献进行全面分析。我们在Medline、PubMed和Scopus上系统检索了2000年至2023年间发表的文章,筛选出1862项研究,其中6项回顾性研究符合纳入标准。我们在最终分析中纳入了 6550 名患者:SAVR组和TAVR组分别有3292名和3258名患者。两组患者的院内死亡率(几率比(OR)1.11;95% CI 0.59-2.10;P = 0.75)和卒中率(OR 1.25;95% CI 0.85-1.86;P = 0.26)相似。接受 SAVR 的患者永久起搏器植入率(OR 0.54;95% CI 0.35-0.83;P = 0.005)和瓣膜旁漏率(OR 0.47;95% CI 0.26-0.86;P = 0.02)较低。另一方面,接受TAVR的患者急性肾损伤(OR 1.81;95% CI 1.15-2.84;P = 0.010)、大出血(OR 3.76;95% CI 2.18-6.49;P <;0.00001)和肺部并发症(OR 7.68;95% CI 1.21-48.84;P = 0.03)的发生率较低。尽管早期死亡率数据表明,对于手术风险处于中低水平的双尖瓣 AS 患者来说,TAVR 可能是一种合理的策略,但 PPI 和 PVL 风险的增加令人担忧。前瞻性、随机对照试验报告长期疗效,并根据 BAV 形态学预先定义亚组分析是至关重要的。在此期间,应谨慎对待在手术风险较低的患者中广泛采用 TAVR。
{"title":"Surgical vs transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Jimmy JH. Kang , Nicholas M. Fialka , Ryaan EL-Andari , Abeline Watkins , Yongzhe Hong , Anoop Mathew , Sabin J. Bozso , Jeevan Nagendran","doi":"10.1016/j.tcm.2023.04.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tcm.2023.04.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>This systematic review<span><span> and meta-analysis aim to provide a comprehensive analysis of the literature directly comparing the outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement<span> (SAVR) and TAVR </span></span>in patients<span> with BAV stenosis. Medline, PubMed, and Scopus were systematically searched for articles published between 2000 and 2023, 1862 studies were screened, and 6 retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria. We included 6550 patients in the final analyses: 3,292 and 3,258 in the SAVR and TAVR groups, respectively. Both groups have similar rates of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio (OR) 1.11; 95% CI 0.59–2.10; </span></span></span><em>p</em> = 0.75) and stroke (OR 1.25; 95% CI 0.85–1.86; <em>p</em><span> = 0.26. Patients who underwent SAVR experienced lower rates of permanent pacemaker implantation (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.35–0.83; </span><em>p</em><span> = 0.005) and paravalvular leak (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.26–0.86; </span><em>p</em><span> = 0.02). On the other hand, patients who underwent TAVR displayed lower rates of acute kidney injury (OR 1.81; 95% CI 1.15–2.84; </span><em>p</em> = 0.010), major bleeding (OR 3.76; 95% CI 2.18–6.49; <em>p</em> < 0.00001), and pulmonary complications (OR 7.68; 95% CI 1.21–48.84; <em>p</em><span> = 0.03). Despite the early mortality data suggesting that TAVR may be a reasonable strategy for patients with bicuspid AS with low to intermediate surgical risk, the increased risk of PPI and PVL is concerning. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial reporting long-term outcomes with pre-defined subgroup analyses based on BAV morphology is paramount. In the interim, caution should be exercised in the widespread adoption of TAVR in lower surgical-risk patients.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":51199,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"34 5","pages":"Pages 304-313"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9896410","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2023.04.006
Xander Jacquemyn , Jef Van den Eynde , Quinten Iwens , Janne Billiau , Habib Jabagi , Derek Serna-Gallegos , Danny Chu , Ibrahim Sultan , Michel Pompeu Sá
Background
Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) are a challenging and understudied population. Specifically, the late outcomes following surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with CKD remains uncertain.
Objectives
To compare overall mortality risk in patients with moderate-to-severe CKD following TAVI versus SAVR.
Methods
Study-level meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data from Kaplan-Meier curves of studies published by August 2022.
Results
Nine studies met our inclusion criteria. Patients who underwent TAVI had a higher 5-year mortality compared with patients undergoing SAVR in the overall population (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.44–1.69, P < 0.001) and in populations with similar risk scores (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.01–1.31, P = 0.035). The landmark analysis revealed a lower risk of 30-day mortality with TAVI (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41–0.94, P = 0.023), followed by similar risk until 7.5 months (HR 1, 95% CI 0.78–1.27, P = 0.978). In contrast, the landmark analysis beyond 7.5 months yielded a reversal of the HR in favor of SAVR (TAVI with HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.08–1.49 P = 0.003).
Conclusions
In patients with CKD, TAVI provides an initial survival benefit over SAVR. However, in the long run, a significant survival benefit of SAVR over TAVI was observed. Our findings highlight the need for randomized controlled trials to investigate outcomes in this special population.
{"title":"Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in chronic kidney disease: Meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data","authors":"Xander Jacquemyn , Jef Van den Eynde , Quinten Iwens , Janne Billiau , Habib Jabagi , Derek Serna-Gallegos , Danny Chu , Ibrahim Sultan , Michel Pompeu Sá","doi":"10.1016/j.tcm.2023.04.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tcm.2023.04.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) are a challenging and understudied population. Specifically, the late outcomes following surgical </span>aortic valve replacement<span> (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve implantation<span> (TAVI) in patients with CKD remains uncertain.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To compare overall mortality risk in patients with moderate-to-severe CKD following TAVI versus SAVR.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Study-level meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data from Kaplan-Meier curves of studies published by August 2022.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Nine studies met our inclusion criteria. Patients who underwent TAVI had a higher 5-year mortality compared with patients undergoing SAVR in the overall population (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.44–1.69, <em>P</em> < 0.001) and in populations with similar risk scores (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.01–1.31, <em>P</em> = 0.035). The landmark analysis revealed a lower risk of 30-day mortality with TAVI (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41–0.94, <em>P</em> = 0.023), followed by similar risk until 7.5 months (HR 1, 95% CI 0.78–1.27, <em>P</em> = 0.978). In contrast, the landmark analysis beyond 7.5 months yielded a reversal of the HR in favor of SAVR (TAVI with HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.08–1.49 <em>P</em> = 0.003).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In patients with CKD, TAVI provides an initial survival benefit over SAVR. However, in the long run, a significant survival benefit of SAVR over TAVI was observed. Our findings highlight the need for randomized controlled trials to investigate outcomes in this special population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51199,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"34 5","pages":"Pages 317-324"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9577567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2023.06.001
J. Kevin Donahue
{"title":"Editorial commentary: The mundane and the profound of QT prolongation in the opioid abuse crisis","authors":"J. Kevin Donahue","doi":"10.1016/j.tcm.2023.06.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tcm.2023.06.001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51199,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"34 5","pages":"Pages 286-287"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9941334","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2023.07.002
Jairo Aldana-Bitar , Deepak L. Bhatt , Matthew J. Budoff
Atherosclerotic plaque assessment has become a crucial element in the examination of cardiovascular diseases. Plaque may exhibit progression and could become unstable if not treated, making plaque regression and stabilization among the most important goals of any cardiovascular intervention in cardiovascular medicine. In this review, we explore the current understanding of plaque regression and stabilization, discuss imaging and measurement techniques, and examine the evidence for pharmacological interventions and other interventions aimed at addressing this condition.
{"title":"Regression and stabilization of atherogenic plaques","authors":"Jairo Aldana-Bitar , Deepak L. Bhatt , Matthew J. Budoff","doi":"10.1016/j.tcm.2023.07.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tcm.2023.07.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Atherosclerotic plaque assessment has become a crucial element in the examination of cardiovascular diseases. Plaque may exhibit progression and could become unstable if not treated, making plaque regression and stabilization among the most important goals of any cardiovascular intervention in cardiovascular medicine. In this review, we explore the current understanding of plaque regression and stabilization, discuss imaging and measurement techniques, and examine the evidence for pharmacological interventions and other interventions aimed at addressing this condition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51199,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"34 5","pages":"Pages 340-346"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10301298","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2023.04.002
Alexander Turin , Eugene H Chung
{"title":"Editorial commentary: Rhythm control in atrial fibrillation: How the early bird may get the worm","authors":"Alexander Turin , Eugene H Chung","doi":"10.1016/j.tcm.2023.04.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tcm.2023.04.002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51199,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"34 5","pages":"Pages 295-296"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9441536","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}