首页 > 最新文献

Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research最新文献

英文 中文
What Constitutes High-Quality Paediatric Palliative Care? A Qualitative Exploration of the Perspectives of Children, Young People, and Parents. 什么构成了高质量的儿科姑息治疗?儿童、青少年和父母视角的定性探索。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-25 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-025-00744-8
Debbie Braybrook, Lucy Coombes, Hannah M Scott, Daney Harðardóttir, Anna Roach, Jemimah Bariuan, Clare Ellis-Smith, Julia Downing, Fliss E M Murtagh, Myra Bluebond-Langner, Lorna K Fraser, Richard Harding, Katherine Bristowe

Background: Globally, over 21 million children need palliative care each year. Although guidelines exist to support paediatric palliative care delivery, they are not informed by the experiences of children themselves.

Objective: We aimed to determine what constitutes good quality palliative care from the perspectives of children with life-limiting or life-threatening conditions and their parents.

Methods: We analysed semi-structured qualitative interviews using reflexive thematic analysis informed by the European Association for Palliative Care charter of palliative care for children and young people, and Bronfenbrenner's bioecological model. Participants included 26 children aged 5-17 years, and 40 parents of children aged 0-17 years, with a range of cancer and non-cancer diagnoses in nine UK paediatric palliative care services (hospitals and hospices).

Results: Quality paediatric palliative care can be both enacted or interrupted across the five domains of the bioecological model. Honest timely communication with the child and family (microsystem), and collaborative relationships between care teams and others in the child's life (mesosystem), are vital. Care experiences are negatively affected by inequities in care provision (exosystems), and society's reluctance to discuss mortality in childhood (macrosystem). Children need to enjoy what matters to them, and maintain social connections, and plan for the future, even if facing a shortened life (chronosystem).

Conclusions: Children and parents are experts in their condition and should be actively involved in care discussions, through communication tailored to the child's pace and preferences, and support advocating for and coordinating care services. Fostering strong and collaborative relationships builds trust and helps children and families to feel safe, included and supported.

背景:全球每年有2100多万儿童需要姑息治疗。尽管存在支持儿科姑息治疗提供的指导方针,但这些指导方针并没有根据儿童本身的经验。目的:我们旨在从限制生命或危及生命的儿童及其父母的角度确定什么是高质量的姑息治疗。方法:采用欧洲姑息治疗协会儿童和青少年姑息治疗章程和Bronfenbrenner的生物生态模型提供的反身性主题分析,对半结构化定性访谈进行分析。参与者包括26名5-17岁的儿童和40名0-17岁儿童的父母,他们在英国9家儿科姑息治疗服务机构(医院和临终关怀院)接受了一系列癌症和非癌症诊断。结果:高质量的儿科姑息治疗可以在生物生态模型的五个领域实施或中断。与儿童和家庭(微系统)诚实及时的沟通,以及护理团队和儿童生活中其他人之间的合作关系(中系统)是至关重要的。护理经验受到护理提供不公平(外系统)和社会不愿讨论儿童死亡率(宏观系统)的负面影响。即使面对缩短的生命(时间系统),孩子们也需要享受对他们重要的事情,保持社会联系,并计划未来。结论:儿童和家长是自身状况的专家,应积极参与护理讨论,根据儿童的节奏和偏好进行沟通,支持倡导和协调护理服务。培养强大的合作关系,建立信任,帮助儿童和家庭感到安全、包容和支持。
{"title":"What Constitutes High-Quality Paediatric Palliative Care? A Qualitative Exploration of the Perspectives of Children, Young People, and Parents.","authors":"Debbie Braybrook, Lucy Coombes, Hannah M Scott, Daney Harðardóttir, Anna Roach, Jemimah Bariuan, Clare Ellis-Smith, Julia Downing, Fliss E M Murtagh, Myra Bluebond-Langner, Lorna K Fraser, Richard Harding, Katherine Bristowe","doi":"10.1007/s40271-025-00744-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40271-025-00744-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Globally, over 21 million children need palliative care each year. Although guidelines exist to support paediatric palliative care delivery, they are not informed by the experiences of children themselves.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to determine what constitutes good quality palliative care from the perspectives of children with life-limiting or life-threatening conditions and their parents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed semi-structured qualitative interviews using reflexive thematic analysis informed by the European Association for Palliative Care charter of palliative care for children and young people, and Bronfenbrenner's bioecological model. Participants included 26 children aged 5-17 years, and 40 parents of children aged 0-17 years, with a range of cancer and non-cancer diagnoses in nine UK paediatric palliative care services (hospitals and hospices).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quality paediatric palliative care can be both enacted or interrupted across the five domains of the bioecological model. Honest timely communication with the child and family (microsystem), and collaborative relationships between care teams and others in the child's life (mesosystem), are vital. Care experiences are negatively affected by inequities in care provision (exosystems), and society's reluctance to discuss mortality in childhood (macrosystem). Children need to enjoy what matters to them, and maintain social connections, and plan for the future, even if facing a shortened life (chronosystem).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Children and parents are experts in their condition and should be actively involved in care discussions, through communication tailored to the child's pace and preferences, and support advocating for and coordinating care services. Fostering strong and collaborative relationships builds trust and helps children and families to feel safe, included and supported.</p>","PeriodicalId":51271,"journal":{"name":"Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"539-561"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12408654/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144144158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Discrete Choice Experiment Versus Best-Worst Scaling: An Empirical Comparison in Eliciting Young People's Preferences for Web-Based Mental Health Interventions. 离散选择实验与最佳-最差尺度:在引出年轻人对基于网络的心理健康干预偏好的实证比较。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-02 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-025-00739-5
Thi Quynh Anh Ho, Lidia Engel, Long Khanh-Dao Le, Glenn Melvin, Jemimah Ride, Ha N D Le, Cathrine Mihalopoulos

Background: Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) and best-worst scaling (BWS) profile cases (BWS case 2, or BWS-2) have been increasingly used in eliciting preferences towards health care interventions. However, it remains unclear which method is more suitable for preference elicitation, particularly in the mental health context. This study aims to compare: (1) the preference results elicited from a DCE and BWS-2; and (2) the acceptability of the two methods in the context of web-based mental health interventions (W-MHIs) for managing anxiety and depression in young people.

Methods: Participants were aged 18-25 years, lived in Australia, and self-reported experiencing anxiety and/or depression in the past 12 months. They also had either an intention to use W-MHIs or previous experience with W-MHIs for managing anxiety and/or depression. Recruitment was conducted online via social media and Deakin University notice boards. Eligible participants completed an online survey containing eight DCE and eight BWS-2 choice tasks. Both types of choice tasks comprised six attributes. A multinominal logit model was used to estimate the preference weights and relative importance of attributes. Acceptability was assessed on the basis of dropout rate, completion time, task difficulty, understanding, and participants' preferred type of choice task.

Results: A total of 198 participants (mean age: 21.42 ± 2.3 years, 64.65% female) completed the survey. Both DCE and BWS-2 predicted that cost was the most important attribute in young people's decision to engage with W-MHIs. However, the two methods differed in the relative importance of attributes and the preference ranking of levels within attributes. The DCE was perceived as easier to understand and answer, with nearly 64% of the participants preferring it over the BWS-2.

Conclusions: While both methods found cost was the most important attribute associated with engagement with W-MHIs, differences in the ranking of other attributes suggest that DCE and BWS-2 are not necessarily interchangeable. Increased acceptability by study participants of the DCE format suggests that this technique may have more merit than BWS-2-at least in the current study's context. Further research is required to identify the optimal method for determining the relative importance of attributes.

背景:离散选择实验(dce)和最佳-最差尺度(BWS)案例(BWS案例2,或BWS-2)越来越多地用于引出对卫生保健干预措施的偏好。然而,目前尚不清楚哪种方法更适合于偏好激发,特别是在心理健康方面。本研究旨在比较:(1)DCE和BWS-2的偏好结果;(2)两种方法在基于网络的心理健康干预(W-MHIs)管理年轻人焦虑和抑郁的背景下的可接受性。方法:参与者年龄在18-25岁之间,居住在澳大利亚,自我报告在过去的12个月内经历过焦虑和/或抑郁。他们也有使用w - mhe的意图或以前使用w - mhe治疗焦虑和/或抑郁的经验。招聘是通过社交媒体和迪肯大学的布告栏进行的。合格的参与者完成了一项在线调查,其中包括8项DCE和8项BWS-2选择任务。这两种类型的选择任务都包含六个属性。采用多项逻辑模型估计属性的偏好权重和相对重要性。可接受性的评估基于辍学率、完成时间、任务难度、理解程度和参与者偏好的选择任务类型。结果:共198人完成调查,平均年龄21.42±2.3岁,女性64.65%。DCE和BWS-2均预测,成本是影响年轻人参与网络医疗服务决策的最重要因素。然而,这两种方法在属性的相对重要性和属性内级别的偏好排序方面存在差异。DCE被认为更容易理解和回答,近64%的参与者更喜欢它而不是BWS-2。结论:虽然两种方法都发现成本是与W-MHIs参与相关的最重要属性,但其他属性排名的差异表明DCE和BWS-2不一定是可互换的。研究参与者对DCE格式的接受度提高表明,这种技术可能比bws -2更有价值——至少在当前研究的上下文中是这样。确定属性相对重要性的最佳方法有待进一步研究。
{"title":"Discrete Choice Experiment Versus Best-Worst Scaling: An Empirical Comparison in Eliciting Young People's Preferences for Web-Based Mental Health Interventions.","authors":"Thi Quynh Anh Ho, Lidia Engel, Long Khanh-Dao Le, Glenn Melvin, Jemimah Ride, Ha N D Le, Cathrine Mihalopoulos","doi":"10.1007/s40271-025-00739-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40271-025-00739-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) and best-worst scaling (BWS) profile cases (BWS case 2, or BWS-2) have been increasingly used in eliciting preferences towards health care interventions. However, it remains unclear which method is more suitable for preference elicitation, particularly in the mental health context. This study aims to compare: (1) the preference results elicited from a DCE and BWS-2; and (2) the acceptability of the two methods in the context of web-based mental health interventions (W-MHIs) for managing anxiety and depression in young people.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were aged 18-25 years, lived in Australia, and self-reported experiencing anxiety and/or depression in the past 12 months. They also had either an intention to use W-MHIs or previous experience with W-MHIs for managing anxiety and/or depression. Recruitment was conducted online via social media and Deakin University notice boards. Eligible participants completed an online survey containing eight DCE and eight BWS-2 choice tasks. Both types of choice tasks comprised six attributes. A multinominal logit model was used to estimate the preference weights and relative importance of attributes. Acceptability was assessed on the basis of dropout rate, completion time, task difficulty, understanding, and participants' preferred type of choice task.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 198 participants (mean age: 21.42 ± 2.3 years, 64.65% female) completed the survey. Both DCE and BWS-2 predicted that cost was the most important attribute in young people's decision to engage with W-MHIs. However, the two methods differed in the relative importance of attributes and the preference ranking of levels within attributes. The DCE was perceived as easier to understand and answer, with nearly 64% of the participants preferring it over the BWS-2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While both methods found cost was the most important attribute associated with engagement with W-MHIs, differences in the ranking of other attributes suggest that DCE and BWS-2 are not necessarily interchangeable. Increased acceptability by study participants of the DCE format suggests that this technique may have more merit than BWS-2-at least in the current study's context. Further research is required to identify the optimal method for determining the relative importance of attributes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51271,"journal":{"name":"Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"357-372"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170701/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144048981","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How to Present a Decision Object in Health Preference Research: Attributes and Levels, the Decision Model, and the Descriptive Framework. 如何在健康偏好研究中呈现决策对象:属性和等级、决策模型和描述性框架。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-10 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-024-00673-y
Axel C Mühlbacher, Esther W de Bekker-Grob, Oliver Rivero-Arias, Bennett Levitan, Caroline Vass

In health preference research (HPR) studies, data are generated by participants'/subjects' decisions. When developing an HPR study, it is therefore important to have a clear understanding of the components of a decision and how those components stimulate participant behavior. To obtain valid and reliable results, study designers must sufficiently describe the decision model and its components. HPR studies require a detailed examination of the decision criteria, detailed documentation of the descriptive framework, and specification of hypotheses. The objects that stimulate subjects' decisions in HPR studies are defined by attributes and attribute levels. Any limitations in the identification and presentation of attributes and levels can negatively affect preference elicitation, the quality of the HPR data, and study results. This practical guide shows how to link the HPR question to an underlying decision model. It covers how to (1) construct a descriptive framework that presents relevant characteristics of a decision object and (2) specify the research hypotheses. The paper outlines steps and available methods to achieve all this, including the methods' advantages and limitations.

在健康偏好研究(HPR)中,数据由参与者/受试者的决定产生。因此,在开展健康偏好研究时,必须清楚地了解决策的组成部分以及这些组成部分如何刺激参与者的行为。为了获得有效可靠的结果,研究设计者必须充分描述决策模型及其组成部分。HPR 研究需要详细审查决策标准,详细记录描述框架,并明确假设。在 HPR 研究中,刺激受试者做出决策的对象是由属性和属性等级定义的。在属性和等级的识别和呈现方面存在的任何限制都会对偏好激发、HPR 数据质量和研究结果产生负面影响。本实用指南介绍了如何将 HPR 问题与基本决策模型联系起来。内容包括:(1) 如何构建一个描述性框架,呈现决策对象的相关特征;(2) 如何明确研究假设。本文概述了实现这一切的步骤和可用方法,包括这些方法的优势和局限性。
{"title":"How to Present a Decision Object in Health Preference Research: Attributes and Levels, the Decision Model, and the Descriptive Framework.","authors":"Axel C Mühlbacher, Esther W de Bekker-Grob, Oliver Rivero-Arias, Bennett Levitan, Caroline Vass","doi":"10.1007/s40271-024-00673-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40271-024-00673-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In health preference research (HPR) studies, data are generated by participants'/subjects' decisions. When developing an HPR study, it is therefore important to have a clear understanding of the components of a decision and how those components stimulate participant behavior. To obtain valid and reliable results, study designers must sufficiently describe the decision model and its components. HPR studies require a detailed examination of the decision criteria, detailed documentation of the descriptive framework, and specification of hypotheses. The objects that stimulate subjects' decisions in HPR studies are defined by attributes and attribute levels. Any limitations in the identification and presentation of attributes and levels can negatively affect preference elicitation, the quality of the HPR data, and study results. This practical guide shows how to link the HPR question to an underlying decision model. It covers how to (1) construct a descriptive framework that presents relevant characteristics of a decision object and (2) specify the research hypotheses. The paper outlines steps and available methods to achieve all this, including the methods' advantages and limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51271,"journal":{"name":"Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"291-302"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170727/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139716661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Identifying and Managing Fraudulent Respondents in Online Stated Preferences Surveys: A Case Example from Best-Worst Scaling in Health Preferences Research. 识别和管理在线陈述偏好调查中的欺诈性应答者:健康偏好研究中最佳-最差尺度的一个案例。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-03 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-025-00740-y
Karen V MacDonald, Geoffrey C Nguyen, Maida J Sewitch, Deborah A Marshall

Background: There is limited evidence and guidance in health preferences research to prevent, identify, and manage fraudulent respondents and data fraud, especially for best-worst scaling (BWS) and discrete choice experiments with nonordered attributes. Using an example from a BWS survey in which we experienced data fraud, we aimed to: (1) develop an approach to identify, verify, and categorize fraudulent respondents; (2) assess the impact of fraudulent respondents on data and results; and (3) identify variables associated with fraudulent respondents.

Methods: An online BWS survey on healthcare services for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) was administered to Canadian IBD patients. We used a three-step approach to identify, verify, and categorize respondents as likely fraudulent (LF), likely real (LR), and unsure. First, responses to 12 "red flag" variables (variables identified as indicators of fraud) were coded 0 (pass) or 1 (fail) then summed to generate a "fraudulent response score" (FRS; range: 0-12 (most likely fraudulent)) used to categorize respondents. Second, respondents categorized LR or unsure underwent age verification. Third, categorization was updated on the basis of age verification results. BWS data were analyzed using conditional logit and latent class analysis. Subgroup analysis was done by final categorization, FRS, and red flag variables.

Results: Overall, n = 4334 respondents underwent initial categorization resulting in 24% (n = 1019) LF and 76% (n = 3315) needing further review. After review, 75% (n = 3258) were categorized as LF and n = 484 underwent age verification. Respondent categorization was updated on the basis of age verification, with final categorization of 76% (n = 3297) LF, 14% (n = 592) unsure, 10% (n = 442) LR, and < 1% (n = 3) duplicates of LR. BWS item rankings differed most by respondent category. Latent class analysis demonstrated final categorization was significantly associated with class membership; class 1 had characteristics consistent with LR respondents and item ranking order for class 1 closely aligned with LR respondent conditional logit results. Suspicious email was the most frequently failed red flag variable and was associated with fraudulent respondents.

Conclusions: Additional steps to review data and verify age resulted in better categorization than only FRS or single red flag variables. Email authentication, single use/unique survey links, and built-in identification verification may be most effective for fraud prevention. Guidance is needed on good research practices for most effective and efficient approaches for preventing, identifying, and managing fraudulent data in health preferences research, specifically in studies with nonordered attributes.

背景:在健康偏好研究中,预防、识别和管理欺诈性应答者和数据欺诈的证据和指导有限,特别是对于最佳最差缩放(BWS)和具有无序属性的离散选择实验。以BWS调查中的数据欺诈为例,我们的目标是:(1)开发一种方法来识别、验证和分类欺诈受访者;(2)评估欺诈性应答者对数据和结果的影响;(3)识别与欺诈应答者相关的变量。方法:对加拿大IBD患者进行了一项关于炎症性肠病(IBD)医疗服务的在线BWS调查。我们采用了三步法来识别、验证并将受访者分类为可能欺诈(LF)、可能真实(LR)和不确定。首先,对12个“红旗”变量(被确定为欺诈指标的变量)的回应被编码为0(通过)或1(失败),然后求和生成“欺诈回应得分”(FRS;范围:0-12(最有可能欺诈))用于对受访者进行分类。其次,被归类为LR或不确定的受访者进行了年龄验证。第三,根据年龄验证结果更新分类。BWS数据采用条件logit和潜在类分析进行分析。通过最终分类、FRS和红旗变量进行亚组分析。结果:总体而言,n = 4334名受访者进行了初步分类,导致24% (n = 1019)的LF和76% (n = 3315)需要进一步审查。经审查,75% (n = 3258)被归类为LF, n = 484进行了年龄验证。在年龄验证的基础上更新被调查者分类,最终分类为76% (n = 3297) LF, 14% (n = 592)不确定,10% (n = 442) LR和< 1% (n = 3)重复LR。BWS项目排名在被调查者类别之间差异最大。潜在类别分析表明,最终分类与类别成员显著相关;类别1的特征与LR被调查者一致,类别1的项目排名顺序与LR被调查者的条件逻辑结果密切相关。可疑邮件是最常失败的危险信号变量,与欺诈性受访者有关。结论:与仅采用FRS或单一危险信号变量相比,进一步审查数据和验证年龄可以更好地进行分类。电子邮件认证、单次使用/唯一调查链接和内置身份验证可能是最有效的欺诈预防方法。需要就良好的研究实践提供指导,以便最有效地预防、识别和管理健康偏好研究中的欺诈性数据,特别是在具有无序属性的研究中。
{"title":"Identifying and Managing Fraudulent Respondents in Online Stated Preferences Surveys: A Case Example from Best-Worst Scaling in Health Preferences Research.","authors":"Karen V MacDonald, Geoffrey C Nguyen, Maida J Sewitch, Deborah A Marshall","doi":"10.1007/s40271-025-00740-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40271-025-00740-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is limited evidence and guidance in health preferences research to prevent, identify, and manage fraudulent respondents and data fraud, especially for best-worst scaling (BWS) and discrete choice experiments with nonordered attributes. Using an example from a BWS survey in which we experienced data fraud, we aimed to: (1) develop an approach to identify, verify, and categorize fraudulent respondents; (2) assess the impact of fraudulent respondents on data and results; and (3) identify variables associated with fraudulent respondents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online BWS survey on healthcare services for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) was administered to Canadian IBD patients. We used a three-step approach to identify, verify, and categorize respondents as likely fraudulent (LF), likely real (LR), and unsure. First, responses to 12 \"red flag\" variables (variables identified as indicators of fraud) were coded 0 (pass) or 1 (fail) then summed to generate a \"fraudulent response score\" (FRS; range: 0-12 (most likely fraudulent)) used to categorize respondents. Second, respondents categorized LR or unsure underwent age verification. Third, categorization was updated on the basis of age verification results. BWS data were analyzed using conditional logit and latent class analysis. Subgroup analysis was done by final categorization, FRS, and red flag variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, n = 4334 respondents underwent initial categorization resulting in 24% (n = 1019) LF and 76% (n = 3315) needing further review. After review, 75% (n = 3258) were categorized as LF and n = 484 underwent age verification. Respondent categorization was updated on the basis of age verification, with final categorization of 76% (n = 3297) LF, 14% (n = 592) unsure, 10% (n = 442) LR, and < 1% (n = 3) duplicates of LR. BWS item rankings differed most by respondent category. Latent class analysis demonstrated final categorization was significantly associated with class membership; class 1 had characteristics consistent with LR respondents and item ranking order for class 1 closely aligned with LR respondent conditional logit results. Suspicious email was the most frequently failed red flag variable and was associated with fraudulent respondents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Additional steps to review data and verify age resulted in better categorization than only FRS or single red flag variables. Email authentication, single use/unique survey links, and built-in identification verification may be most effective for fraud prevention. Guidance is needed on good research practices for most effective and efficient approaches for preventing, identifying, and managing fraudulent data in health preferences research, specifically in studies with nonordered attributes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51271,"journal":{"name":"Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"373-390"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144057827","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Co-designing Healthcare Interventions with Users: A Discrete Choice Experiment to Understand Young People's Preferences for Sexual and Reproductive Health Services in Lusaka, Zambia. 与用户共同设计医疗保健干预:一项离散选择实验,以了解赞比亚卢萨卡年轻人对性和生殖健康服务的偏好。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-10 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-025-00737-7
Lawrence Mwenge, Matthew Quaife, Lucheka Sigande, Sian Floyd, Melvin Simuyaba, Mwelwa Phiri, Chisanga Mwansa, Mutale Kabumbu, Musonda Simwinga, Kwame Shanaube, Ab Schaap, Sarah Fidler, Richard Hayes, Helen Ayles, Bernadette Hensen, Peter Hangoma

Introduction: Like in many countries, coverage of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services among adolescents and young people (AYP) aged 15-24 remains low in Zambia. Increasing coverage of SRH services requires interventions that are responsive to the needs and preferences of AYP. We conducted a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to elicit AYP's preferences for SRH service delivery in Lusaka, Zambia.

Methods: A cross-sectional DCE was conducted with AYP aged 15-24 years. Consenting participants were presented with alternative SRH service delivery strategies represented by six attributes, namely: location, type of provider, type of services, service differentiation by sex, availability of edutainment, and opening hours. Multinomial logit and random parameters logit models were used to analyse the data. All variables were effect coded.

Results: A total of 423 AYP aged 15-24 years (61% female) completed the DCE. Respondents preferred SRH services that were integrated with other healthcare services (b = 0.65, p < 0.001), delivered by medical staff and peer support workers (b = 0.44, p < 0.001), and provided at a hub within a health facility (b = 0.62, p < 0.001). AYP also preferred services to be available on weekends during the daytime (b = 0.37, p < 0.001). Participants also preferred alternatives which included edutainment (b = 0.22, p < 0.001). Service differentiation by sex had little effect on the preference for SRH service delivery (b = - 0.05, p = 0.08). The coefficient for the "neither" option was negative and statistically significant (b = - 5.31, p < 0.001), implying that AYP did not favor routine SRH service delivery in an outpatient department.

Conclusion: Efforts to increase SRH service utilization among AYP should focus on providing comprehensive SRH services that are integrated with other healthcare services. These services should be delivered by a combination of medical staff and peer supporter workers in youth-friendly spaces. Careful attention should be paid to opening times to ensure that these are convenient to AYP.

导言:与许多国家一样,赞比亚15-24岁青少年和青年的性健康和生殖健康服务覆盖率仍然很低。提高性健康和生殖健康服务的覆盖率,需要采取符合计划需要和偏好的干预措施。我们进行了一项离散选择实验(DCE),以引出赞比亚卢萨卡的AYP对SRH服务提供的偏好。方法:15 ~ 24岁AYP患者行横断面DCE。向同意的参与者展示了由六个属性表示的替代性性健康和健康服务提供策略,即:地点、提供者类型、服务类型、按性别区分的服务、教育娱乐的可用性和开放时间。采用多项logit和随机参数logit模型对数据进行分析。所有变量都进行了效果编码。结果:共有423名15-24岁的AYP(61%为女性)完成了DCE。被调查者更喜欢与其他保健服务相结合的性健康和生殖健康服务(b = 0.65, p < 0.001),由医务人员和同伴支持工作者提供(b = 0.44, p < 0.001),并在卫生机构内的中心提供(b = 0.62, p < 0.001)。AYP还倾向于在周末白天提供服务(b = 0.37, p < 0.001)。参与者还更喜欢包括寓教于乐在内的替代方案(b = 0.22, p < 0.001)。性别服务差异对SRH服务提供偏好影响不大(b = - 0.05, p = 0.08)。“两者都不是”选项的系数为负且具有统计学意义(b = - 5.31, p < 0.001),这意味着AYP不支持门诊的常规SRH服务提供。结论:提高青少年生殖健康服务利用率的重点应放在提供与其他医疗服务相结合的综合生殖健康服务上。这些服务应由医务人员和同侪支持工作者在青年友好空间共同提供。应仔细注意开放时间,以确保方便AYP。
{"title":"Co-designing Healthcare Interventions with Users: A Discrete Choice Experiment to Understand Young People's Preferences for Sexual and Reproductive Health Services in Lusaka, Zambia.","authors":"Lawrence Mwenge, Matthew Quaife, Lucheka Sigande, Sian Floyd, Melvin Simuyaba, Mwelwa Phiri, Chisanga Mwansa, Mutale Kabumbu, Musonda Simwinga, Kwame Shanaube, Ab Schaap, Sarah Fidler, Richard Hayes, Helen Ayles, Bernadette Hensen, Peter Hangoma","doi":"10.1007/s40271-025-00737-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40271-025-00737-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Like in many countries, coverage of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services among adolescents and young people (AYP) aged 15-24 remains low in Zambia. Increasing coverage of SRH services requires interventions that are responsive to the needs and preferences of AYP. We conducted a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to elicit AYP's preferences for SRH service delivery in Lusaka, Zambia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional DCE was conducted with AYP aged 15-24 years. Consenting participants were presented with alternative SRH service delivery strategies represented by six attributes, namely: location, type of provider, type of services, service differentiation by sex, availability of edutainment, and opening hours. Multinomial logit and random parameters logit models were used to analyse the data. All variables were effect coded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 423 AYP aged 15-24 years (61% female) completed the DCE. Respondents preferred SRH services that were integrated with other healthcare services (b = 0.65, p < 0.001), delivered by medical staff and peer support workers (b = 0.44, p < 0.001), and provided at a hub within a health facility (b = 0.62, p < 0.001). AYP also preferred services to be available on weekends during the daytime (b = 0.37, p < 0.001). Participants also preferred alternatives which included edutainment (b = 0.22, p < 0.001). Service differentiation by sex had little effect on the preference for SRH service delivery (b = - 0.05, p = 0.08). The coefficient for the \"neither\" option was negative and statistically significant (b = - 5.31, p < 0.001), implying that AYP did not favor routine SRH service delivery in an outpatient department.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Efforts to increase SRH service utilization among AYP should focus on providing comprehensive SRH services that are integrated with other healthcare services. These services should be delivered by a combination of medical staff and peer supporter workers in youth-friendly spaces. Careful attention should be paid to opening times to ensure that these are convenient to AYP.</p>","PeriodicalId":51271,"journal":{"name":"Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"391-402"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144059544","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How do Design Characteristics Affect Respondent Engagement? Assessing Attribute Non-attendance in Discrete Choice Experiments Valuing the EQ-5D-5L. 设计特征如何影响被调查者的参与度?评价EQ-5D-5L的离散选择实验中属性缺席的评估
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-15 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-025-00735-9
Peiwen Jiang, Deborah Street, Richard Norman, Rosalie Viney, Mark Oppe, Brendan Mulhern

Introduction: Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are increasingly applied to develop value sets for health-related quality-of-life instruments, but respondents may adopt various simplifying heuristics that affect the resulting health state values. Attribute level overlap can make these DCE tasks easier and thereby increase respondent engagement. This study uses choice tasks involving EQ-5D-5L health states to compare designs with and without overlap, constructed using different methods (generator-developed design, Ngene, SAS, and Bayesian D-efficient design) to assess respondent non-attendance to attributes.

Methods: A multi-arm DCE using the EQ-5D-5L was conducted in the Australian general population. The performance of designs with various properties was compared using the level of respondent engagement. Respondent engagement was quantified through the inferred attribute non-attendance (ANA) estimated by the equality constrained latent class model. Utility decrements derived using all respondents (i.e., including non-attendees) were compared with estimates obtained only from those who attended to all EQ-5D-5L attributes.

Results: The inclusion of overlap improved full attendance rates from 22.3-28.4% to 28.2-54.2%. Within designs with overlap, modified Fedorov designs (constructed using either Ngene or SAS macros) had higher full attendance rates than other designs. The relative attribute importance of the EQ-5D-5L also differed significantly before and after data exclusion using ANA analysis, but there was no clear pattern in the differences.

Conclusions: This study found evidence to support the use of modified Fedorov designs (constructed using Ngene or SAS) with attribute overlap to reduce ANA and improve respondent engagement in DCE studies. It highlights the potential value of ANA analysis as a quality-control tool for the inclusion and exclusion of respondents in future health valuation work for the EQ-5D-5L.

导言:离散选择实验(DCE)越来越多地被用于为与健康相关的生活质量工具开发价值集,但受访者可能会采用各种简化启发式方法,从而影响最终的健康状态值。属性水平重叠可使这些 DCE 任务变得更容易,从而提高受访者的参与度。本研究使用涉及 EQ-5D-5L 健康状态的选择任务来比较使用不同方法(生成器开发设计、Ngene、SAS 和贝叶斯 D-效率设计)构建的有重叠和无重叠的设计,以评估受访者对属性的不重视程度:方法:在澳大利亚普通人群中使用 EQ-5D-5L 进行了一项多臂 DCE。通过受访者的参与程度来比较具有不同属性的设计的性能。受访者参与度通过平等约束潜类模型估算的推断属性不参与度(ANA)进行量化。使用所有受访者(即包括未出席者)得出的效用降低与仅从出席所有 EQ-5D-5L 属性的受访者中获得的估计值进行了比较:结果:重叠设计将全勤率从 22.3-28.4% 提高到 28.2-54.2%。在有重叠的设计中,修改后的 Fedorov 设计(使用 Ngene 或 SAS 宏构建)的全勤率高于其他设计。在使用 ANA 分析法排除数据前后,EQ-5D-5L 的相对属性重要性也有显著差异,但这种差异没有明显的模式:本研究发现,有证据支持使用属性重叠的改良费多罗夫设计(使用 Ngene 或 SAS 构建)来减少 ANA 并提高 DCE 研究中受访者的参与度。它强调了 ANA 分析作为质量控制工具的潜在价值,可用于在未来的 EQ-5D-5L 健康评估工作中纳入和排除受访者。
{"title":"How do Design Characteristics Affect Respondent Engagement? Assessing Attribute Non-attendance in Discrete Choice Experiments Valuing the EQ-5D-5L.","authors":"Peiwen Jiang, Deborah Street, Richard Norman, Rosalie Viney, Mark Oppe, Brendan Mulhern","doi":"10.1007/s40271-025-00735-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40271-025-00735-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are increasingly applied to develop value sets for health-related quality-of-life instruments, but respondents may adopt various simplifying heuristics that affect the resulting health state values. Attribute level overlap can make these DCE tasks easier and thereby increase respondent engagement. This study uses choice tasks involving EQ-5D-5L health states to compare designs with and without overlap, constructed using different methods (generator-developed design, Ngene, SAS, and Bayesian D-efficient design) to assess respondent non-attendance to attributes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-arm DCE using the EQ-5D-5L was conducted in the Australian general population. The performance of designs with various properties was compared using the level of respondent engagement. Respondent engagement was quantified through the inferred attribute non-attendance (ANA) estimated by the equality constrained latent class model. Utility decrements derived using all respondents (i.e., including non-attendees) were compared with estimates obtained only from those who attended to all EQ-5D-5L attributes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The inclusion of overlap improved full attendance rates from 22.3-28.4% to 28.2-54.2%. Within designs with overlap, modified Fedorov designs (constructed using either Ngene or SAS macros) had higher full attendance rates than other designs. The relative attribute importance of the EQ-5D-5L also differed significantly before and after data exclusion using ANA analysis, but there was no clear pattern in the differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found evidence to support the use of modified Fedorov designs (constructed using Ngene or SAS) with attribute overlap to reduce ANA and improve respondent engagement in DCE studies. It highlights the potential value of ANA analysis as a quality-control tool for the inclusion and exclusion of respondents in future health valuation work for the EQ-5D-5L.</p>","PeriodicalId":51271,"journal":{"name":"Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"329-341"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170736/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143634461","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Elderly People's Preferences for Different Organizational Models for Frailty Screening: A Discrete Choice Experiment. 老年人对不同组织模式的脆弱性筛查偏好:一个离散选择实验。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-02 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-025-00738-6
Lucile Mulot, Fanny Monmousseau, Sophie Dubnitskiy-Robin, Maurine Diot, Pierre Marionnaud, Solène Brunet-Houdard, Bertrand Fougere

Objectives: Frailty dimensions can be evaluated in a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). As frailty is often reversible, early detection can help to maintain a person's independence. The objective of the present study was to identify organizational factors that would encourage people aged 60 years or over to agree to frailty screening.

Methods: A face-to-face discrete choice experiment was conducted to elicit older adults' preferences for five attributes of the CGA: the initiator, pre-assessment, location, schedules, and announcement of the results. To assess the relative importance of attributes and explore relationships between preferences and participant characteristics, the data were analyzed using conditional logit, mixed logit, and bivariate probit models.

Results: A total of 224 people (women: 61.2%; mean age: 72.2 years; urban dwellers: 61.6%; caregivers for other people: 35.6%) completed the survey. The CGA initiator, schedules, and location significantly influenced the respondents' preferences. The organizational preferences varied according to the respondent's quality of life and relationship with the family physician, as well as knowledge of the CGA; while agreement to attend a CGA depended on the person's gender, living environment, socioprofessional category, and caregiver status. Ideally, the CGA should be initiated by the family physician, carried out at the family physician's office or in hospital (but not at home), and split into two parts on the same day. The CGA results should preferably be presented by the healthcare professional who carried out the assessment.

Conclusions: Early frailty screening by a mobile geriatric team or specifically trained professionals in a neutral location close to the older person's home might be envisaged.

目的:衰弱维度可以在综合老年评估(CGA)中进行评估。由于虚弱往往是可逆的,早期发现可以帮助保持一个人的独立性。本研究的目的是确定鼓励60岁或以上的人同意进行虚弱筛查的组织因素。方法:采用面对面离散选择实验,探讨老年人对CGA的发起者、预评估、地点、时间安排和结果公布五个属性的偏好。为了评估属性的相对重要性并探索偏好与参与者特征之间的关系,使用条件logit、混合logit和双变量probit模型分析数据。结果:共224人(女性占61.2%;平均年龄72.2岁;城镇居民:61.6%;其他人的照顾者(35.6%)完成了调查。CGA发起者、时间表和地点显著影响受访者的偏好。组织偏好根据受访者的生活质量、与家庭医生的关系以及对CGA的了解程度而变化;而是否同意参加CGA取决于个人的性别、生活环境、社会专业类别和照顾者的状况。理想情况下,CGA应由家庭医生发起,在家庭医生办公室或医院(但不是在家里)进行,并在同一天分为两个部分。CGA结果最好由进行评估的医疗保健专业人员提供。结论:可以设想由流动老年医学小组或经过专门训练的专业人员在靠近老年人家的中立地点进行早期虚弱筛查。
{"title":"Elderly People's Preferences for Different Organizational Models for Frailty Screening: A Discrete Choice Experiment.","authors":"Lucile Mulot, Fanny Monmousseau, Sophie Dubnitskiy-Robin, Maurine Diot, Pierre Marionnaud, Solène Brunet-Houdard, Bertrand Fougere","doi":"10.1007/s40271-025-00738-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40271-025-00738-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Frailty dimensions can be evaluated in a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). As frailty is often reversible, early detection can help to maintain a person's independence. The objective of the present study was to identify organizational factors that would encourage people aged 60 years or over to agree to frailty screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A face-to-face discrete choice experiment was conducted to elicit older adults' preferences for five attributes of the CGA: the initiator, pre-assessment, location, schedules, and announcement of the results. To assess the relative importance of attributes and explore relationships between preferences and participant characteristics, the data were analyzed using conditional logit, mixed logit, and bivariate probit models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 224 people (women: 61.2%; mean age: 72.2 years; urban dwellers: 61.6%; caregivers for other people: 35.6%) completed the survey. The CGA initiator, schedules, and location significantly influenced the respondents' preferences. The organizational preferences varied according to the respondent's quality of life and relationship with the family physician, as well as knowledge of the CGA; while agreement to attend a CGA depended on the person's gender, living environment, socioprofessional category, and caregiver status. Ideally, the CGA should be initiated by the family physician, carried out at the family physician's office or in hospital (but not at home), and split into two parts on the same day. The CGA results should preferably be presented by the healthcare professional who carried out the assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early frailty screening by a mobile geriatric team or specifically trained professionals in a neutral location close to the older person's home might be envisaged.</p>","PeriodicalId":51271,"journal":{"name":"Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"343-355"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144007813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Content Validity Assessment of the Insomnia Daytime Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire (IDSIQ) Among Adults with Insomnia and Nocturia. 成人失眠伴夜尿症患者日间失眠症状及影响问卷(IDSIQ)内容效度评估
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-025-00733-x
Miriam Kimel, Leah Kleinman, Tobias Di Marco, Antonio Olivieri, Andrea Schulz, Katherine Kirk, Andrea Phillips Beyer

Purpose: The study aimed to support use of the Insomnia Daytime Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire (IDSIQ) in clinical trials for patients with concomitant insomnia disorder and nocturia.

Methods: Eligible participants in this observational study were United States (US) residents aged ≥ 55 years who experienced self-reported symptoms reflecting the diagnostic criteria for insomnia disorder and nocturia (i.e., experienced ≥ 2 nocturnal voids per night within 30 days of screening). Concept elicitation (n = 10), confirmation of limited concepts (n = 5), and cognitive debriefing of the IDSIQ (n = 10) were conducted with 20 participants. A content analysis approach was used.

Results: Most participants in the overall sample were female (n = 13/20, 65%) and white (n = 17/20, 85%), with a mean age of 60.9 years. Based on concept elicitation, most participants (n = 9/10, 90%) experienced insomnia 5-7 nights per week and nocturia 7 nights per week. Participants identified impacts to their emotions, social activities, physical abilities, cognitive function, daily activities, work, and family for insomnia disorder and nocturia. These concepts were confirmed with the five additional interviews. Concept saturation for both disorders was achieved in all participants by the seventh concept elicitation interview. All cognitive interview participants (n = 10) understood the IDSIQ instructions, items, and response options.

Conclusions: Having concurrent insomnia disorder and nocturia is associated with daytime symptoms and impacts to functioning. All participants who were debriefed understood all IDSIQ items and response options. These findings suggest the IDSIQ is a content-valid instrument for use in clinical trials with patients with insomnia and comorbid nocturia.

目的:本研究旨在支持在伴有失眠症和夜尿症患者的临床试验中使用失眠日间症状和影响问卷(IDSIQ)。方法:本观察性研究的符合条件的参与者是年龄≥55岁的美国居民,他们自我报告的症状反映了失眠障碍和夜尿症的诊断标准(即在筛查后30天内每晚经历≥2次夜间排尿)。20名参与者进行了概念启发(n = 10)、有限概念确认(n = 5)和IDSIQ认知汇报(n = 10)。采用内容分析方法。结果:总体样本中以女性(n = 13/20, 65%)和白人(n = 17/20, 85%)居多,平均年龄为60.9岁。根据概念启发,大多数参与者(n = 9/10, 90%)每周失眠5-7晚,夜尿症每周7晚。参与者确定了失眠和夜尿症对他们的情绪、社交活动、身体能力、认知功能、日常活动、工作和家庭的影响。这些概念在另外五次访谈中得到证实。通过第七次概念启发访谈,所有参与者都达到了两种障碍的概念饱和。所有认知访谈参与者(n = 10)都理解IDSIQ的说明、项目和回答选项。结论:并发失眠和夜尿症与日间症状和功能影响有关。所有听取了汇报的参与者都理解IDSIQ的所有项目和应对方案。这些发现表明IDSIQ是一种内容有效的仪器,可用于失眠和合并症夜尿症患者的临床试验。
{"title":"Content Validity Assessment of the Insomnia Daytime Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire (IDSIQ) Among Adults with Insomnia and Nocturia.","authors":"Miriam Kimel, Leah Kleinman, Tobias Di Marco, Antonio Olivieri, Andrea Schulz, Katherine Kirk, Andrea Phillips Beyer","doi":"10.1007/s40271-025-00733-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40271-025-00733-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study aimed to support use of the Insomnia Daytime Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire (IDSIQ) in clinical trials for patients with concomitant insomnia disorder and nocturia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible participants in this observational study were United States (US) residents aged ≥ 55 years who experienced self-reported symptoms reflecting the diagnostic criteria for insomnia disorder and nocturia (i.e., experienced ≥ 2 nocturnal voids per night within 30 days of screening). Concept elicitation (n = 10), confirmation of limited concepts (n = 5), and cognitive debriefing of the IDSIQ (n = 10) were conducted with 20 participants. A content analysis approach was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants in the overall sample were female (n = 13/20, 65%) and white (n = 17/20, 85%), with a mean age of 60.9 years. Based on concept elicitation, most participants (n = 9/10, 90%) experienced insomnia 5-7 nights per week and nocturia 7 nights per week. Participants identified impacts to their emotions, social activities, physical abilities, cognitive function, daily activities, work, and family for insomnia disorder and nocturia. These concepts were confirmed with the five additional interviews. Concept saturation for both disorders was achieved in all participants by the seventh concept elicitation interview. All cognitive interview participants (n = 10) understood the IDSIQ instructions, items, and response options.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Having concurrent insomnia disorder and nocturia is associated with daytime symptoms and impacts to functioning. All participants who were debriefed understood all IDSIQ items and response options. These findings suggest the IDSIQ is a content-valid instrument for use in clinical trials with patients with insomnia and comorbid nocturia.</p>","PeriodicalId":51271,"journal":{"name":"Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"249-261"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11985609/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143517259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Routine Quality-of-Life Measurement in Residential Aged Care: Staff, Resident, and Family Perspectives. 居家老年照护的日常生活品质测量:工作人员、住院医师和家庭观点。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-025-00729-7
Andrew Simon Gilbert, Frances Batchelor, Nancy Devlin, Briony Dow, Brendan Mulhern, Rosalie Viney, Tessa Peasgood, Lidia Engel

Background and objectives: There is interest in routinely measuring quality of life (QoL) in aged care homes, evidenced by the Australian Government's implementation of QoL as a mandatory quality indicator. This study explores views of aged care staff, residents, and family members on the benefits, challenges, and feasibility of implementing routine QoL measures.

Methods: Qualitative data were gathered to explore staff, resident, and family perspectives on QoL measurement in aged care homes, including purpose, benefits, implementation, and best practice. Two staff workshops were conducted at different aged care homes, and semi-structured interviews were held with 29 proxies (9 family members and 20 staff) and 24 residents. Workshops and interviews were transcribed verbatim, and thematically analysed via a qualitative interpretive approach using NVivo software.

Results: Analysis yielded four key themes: (1) benefits of routine QoL measurement; (2) challenges in implementation; (3) best practice for collecting surveys; (4) validity concerns. Identified benefits included potentially improved care, monitoring service performance, and informing family members. Staff participants recommended integrating measures into existing care planning and having oversight from a registered nurse. Participants identified potential implementation challenges, including administrative burden, time and resourcing constraints, conflicts of interest, and resistance from staff, providers, and residents.

Conclusions: This study identifies potential benefits to implementing routine QoL measurement in residential aged care homes. To maximise these benefits, it is important to consider how measurement can be integrated in ways that contribute to existing care planning and practices.

背景和目标:澳大利亚政府将生活质量作为一项强制性质量指标来实施,这证明了人们对老年护理院生活质量(QoL)的常规测量很感兴趣。本研究旨在探讨长者照护人员、住客及家属对实施日常生活质素措施的好处、挑战及可行性的看法。方法:收集定性数据,探讨养老院工作人员、住客和家属对生活质量测量的看法,包括目的、效益、实施和最佳实践。在不同的安老院举办了两次员工工作坊,并与29名代理人(9名家庭成员和20名工作人员)和24名住院者进行了半结构化访谈。工作坊和访谈被逐字记录下来,并通过使用NVivo软件的定性解释方法进行主题分析。结果:分析得出四个关键主题:(1)常规生活质量测量的益处;(2)实施中的挑战;(3)收集调查的最佳做法;(4)效度问题。确定的好处包括可能改善的护理,监测服务绩效,并通知家庭成员。工作人员与会者建议将措施纳入现有的护理计划,并由注册护士进行监督。与会者确定了潜在的实施挑战,包括管理负担、时间和资源限制、利益冲突以及来自工作人员、提供者和住院医生的阻力。结论:本研究确定了在安老院舍实施常规生活质量测量的潜在好处。为了最大限度地发挥这些效益,重要的是要考虑如何以有助于现有护理计划和实践的方式整合测量。
{"title":"Routine Quality-of-Life Measurement in Residential Aged Care: Staff, Resident, and Family Perspectives.","authors":"Andrew Simon Gilbert, Frances Batchelor, Nancy Devlin, Briony Dow, Brendan Mulhern, Rosalie Viney, Tessa Peasgood, Lidia Engel","doi":"10.1007/s40271-025-00729-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40271-025-00729-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>There is interest in routinely measuring quality of life (QoL) in aged care homes, evidenced by the Australian Government's implementation of QoL as a mandatory quality indicator. This study explores views of aged care staff, residents, and family members on the benefits, challenges, and feasibility of implementing routine QoL measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative data were gathered to explore staff, resident, and family perspectives on QoL measurement in aged care homes, including purpose, benefits, implementation, and best practice. Two staff workshops were conducted at different aged care homes, and semi-structured interviews were held with 29 proxies (9 family members and 20 staff) and 24 residents. Workshops and interviews were transcribed verbatim, and thematically analysed via a qualitative interpretive approach using NVivo software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis yielded four key themes: (1) benefits of routine QoL measurement; (2) challenges in implementation; (3) best practice for collecting surveys; (4) validity concerns. Identified benefits included potentially improved care, monitoring service performance, and informing family members. Staff participants recommended integrating measures into existing care planning and having oversight from a registered nurse. Participants identified potential implementation challenges, including administrative burden, time and resourcing constraints, conflicts of interest, and resistance from staff, providers, and residents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identifies potential benefits to implementing routine QoL measurement in residential aged care homes. To maximise these benefits, it is important to consider how measurement can be integrated in ways that contribute to existing care planning and practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":51271,"journal":{"name":"Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"211-223"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11985636/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143082004","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Getting Everyone on Board to Break the Cycle of Bacterial Vaginosis (BV) Recurrence: A Qualitative Study of Partner Treatment for BV. 让每个人都参与进来,打破细菌性阴道病(BV)复发的恶性循环:BV 伴侣治疗定性研究》。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-14 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-025-00731-z
Alicia J King, Tiffany R Phillips, Erica L Plummer, Natasha Wild, Christopher K Fairley, Eric P F Chow, Lenka A Vodstrcil, Catriona S Bradshaw

Introduction: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a common condition that affects the sexual wellbeing of women and other people with a vagina. Recurrence following individual treatment is frequent and exerts a cumulative burden over time. Researchers at the Melbourne Sexual Health Center have recently completed the first successful trial of male partner treatment (MPT) for BV, demonstrating the superior effectiveness of concurrent MPT in reducing recurrence.

Method: Using a case study design, semi-structured interviews with trial participants explored the views and experiences of nine men who had received MPT and nine women whose partners had received MPT. Action and emotion coding were employed to create an explanatory model of experiences of BV recurrence and MPT.

Results: Three key themes within this model related to the cycle of recurrent BV: the physical, psychological, and relationship impacts of BV ("experiencing BV"); the importance of healthcare providers exploring different options and understanding individual context ("seeking care"); and the frustration, cost, and inconvenience of individual treatment ("dealing with it alone"). This cycle was broken by "Getting everyone on board" with MPT. This involved women, men, and healthcare professionals understanding BV and MPT, overcoming barriers to access, and open communication between partners. These factors, in combination, resulted in couples "dealing with BV together", undertaking a week of inconvenience to share the responsibility of preventing recurrence.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that the widescale adoption of MPT for BV will require multilevel approaches to address gaps in the awareness of BV with sensitivity to the relational, social, and structural context of delivering care.

简介细菌性阴道病(BV)是一种影响妇女和其他有阴道者性健康的常见病。个别治疗后经常复发,并随着时间的推移造成累积负担。墨尔本性健康中心(Melbourne Sexual Health Center)的研究人员最近首次成功完成了男性伴侣治疗(MPT)治疗 BV 的试验,证明了同时进行 MPT 在减少复发方面的卓越效果:方法:采用案例研究设计,对试验参与者进行半结构化访谈,探讨九名接受过 MPT 治疗的男性和九名其伴侣接受过 MPT 治疗的女性的观点和经历。结果:该模型中的三个关键主题与 BV 复发和 MPT 有关:该模型中的三个关键主题与 BV 复发的循环有关:BV 对生理、心理和人际关系的影响("经历 BV");医疗服务提供者探索不同选择和了解个人情况的重要性("寻求护理");以及个人治疗的挫败感、成本和不便("独自应对")。打破这一循环的方法是 "让所有人都参与进来"。这涉及到女性、男性和医疗专业人员对 BV 和 MPT 的理解,克服获得治疗的障碍,以及合作伙伴之间的坦诚沟通。这些因素结合在一起,使夫妻 "共同应对 BV",承担一周的不便,分担预防复发的责任:这些研究结果表明,要广泛采用 MPT 治疗 BV,就需要采取多层次的方法,以解决人们对 BV 认识上的差距,并对提供护理的关系、社会和结构背景保持敏感。
{"title":"Getting Everyone on Board to Break the Cycle of Bacterial Vaginosis (BV) Recurrence: A Qualitative Study of Partner Treatment for BV.","authors":"Alicia J King, Tiffany R Phillips, Erica L Plummer, Natasha Wild, Christopher K Fairley, Eric P F Chow, Lenka A Vodstrcil, Catriona S Bradshaw","doi":"10.1007/s40271-025-00731-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40271-025-00731-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a common condition that affects the sexual wellbeing of women and other people with a vagina. Recurrence following individual treatment is frequent and exerts a cumulative burden over time. Researchers at the Melbourne Sexual Health Center have recently completed the first successful trial of male partner treatment (MPT) for BV, demonstrating the superior effectiveness of concurrent MPT in reducing recurrence.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using a case study design, semi-structured interviews with trial participants explored the views and experiences of nine men who had received MPT and nine women whose partners had received MPT. Action and emotion coding were employed to create an explanatory model of experiences of BV recurrence and MPT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three key themes within this model related to the cycle of recurrent BV: the physical, psychological, and relationship impacts of BV (\"experiencing BV\"); the importance of healthcare providers exploring different options and understanding individual context (\"seeking care\"); and the frustration, cost, and inconvenience of individual treatment (\"dealing with it alone\"). This cycle was broken by \"Getting everyone on board\" with MPT. This involved women, men, and healthcare professionals understanding BV and MPT, overcoming barriers to access, and open communication between partners. These factors, in combination, resulted in couples \"dealing with BV together\", undertaking a week of inconvenience to share the responsibility of preventing recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that the widescale adoption of MPT for BV will require multilevel approaches to address gaps in the awareness of BV with sensitivity to the relational, social, and structural context of delivering care.</p>","PeriodicalId":51271,"journal":{"name":"Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"279-290"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11985585/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143630306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1