Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-05-25DOI: 10.1007/s40271-025-00744-8
Debbie Braybrook, Lucy Coombes, Hannah M Scott, Daney Harðardóttir, Anna Roach, Jemimah Bariuan, Clare Ellis-Smith, Julia Downing, Fliss E M Murtagh, Myra Bluebond-Langner, Lorna K Fraser, Richard Harding, Katherine Bristowe
Background: Globally, over 21 million children need palliative care each year. Although guidelines exist to support paediatric palliative care delivery, they are not informed by the experiences of children themselves.
Objective: We aimed to determine what constitutes good quality palliative care from the perspectives of children with life-limiting or life-threatening conditions and their parents.
Methods: We analysed semi-structured qualitative interviews using reflexive thematic analysis informed by the European Association for Palliative Care charter of palliative care for children and young people, and Bronfenbrenner's bioecological model. Participants included 26 children aged 5-17 years, and 40 parents of children aged 0-17 years, with a range of cancer and non-cancer diagnoses in nine UK paediatric palliative care services (hospitals and hospices).
Results: Quality paediatric palliative care can be both enacted or interrupted across the five domains of the bioecological model. Honest timely communication with the child and family (microsystem), and collaborative relationships between care teams and others in the child's life (mesosystem), are vital. Care experiences are negatively affected by inequities in care provision (exosystems), and society's reluctance to discuss mortality in childhood (macrosystem). Children need to enjoy what matters to them, and maintain social connections, and plan for the future, even if facing a shortened life (chronosystem).
Conclusions: Children and parents are experts in their condition and should be actively involved in care discussions, through communication tailored to the child's pace and preferences, and support advocating for and coordinating care services. Fostering strong and collaborative relationships builds trust and helps children and families to feel safe, included and supported.
{"title":"What Constitutes High-Quality Paediatric Palliative Care? A Qualitative Exploration of the Perspectives of Children, Young People, and Parents.","authors":"Debbie Braybrook, Lucy Coombes, Hannah M Scott, Daney Harðardóttir, Anna Roach, Jemimah Bariuan, Clare Ellis-Smith, Julia Downing, Fliss E M Murtagh, Myra Bluebond-Langner, Lorna K Fraser, Richard Harding, Katherine Bristowe","doi":"10.1007/s40271-025-00744-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40271-025-00744-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Globally, over 21 million children need palliative care each year. Although guidelines exist to support paediatric palliative care delivery, they are not informed by the experiences of children themselves.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to determine what constitutes good quality palliative care from the perspectives of children with life-limiting or life-threatening conditions and their parents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed semi-structured qualitative interviews using reflexive thematic analysis informed by the European Association for Palliative Care charter of palliative care for children and young people, and Bronfenbrenner's bioecological model. Participants included 26 children aged 5-17 years, and 40 parents of children aged 0-17 years, with a range of cancer and non-cancer diagnoses in nine UK paediatric palliative care services (hospitals and hospices).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quality paediatric palliative care can be both enacted or interrupted across the five domains of the bioecological model. Honest timely communication with the child and family (microsystem), and collaborative relationships between care teams and others in the child's life (mesosystem), are vital. Care experiences are negatively affected by inequities in care provision (exosystems), and society's reluctance to discuss mortality in childhood (macrosystem). Children need to enjoy what matters to them, and maintain social connections, and plan for the future, even if facing a shortened life (chronosystem).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Children and parents are experts in their condition and should be actively involved in care discussions, through communication tailored to the child's pace and preferences, and support advocating for and coordinating care services. Fostering strong and collaborative relationships builds trust and helps children and families to feel safe, included and supported.</p>","PeriodicalId":51271,"journal":{"name":"Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"539-561"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12408654/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144144158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-05-02DOI: 10.1007/s40271-025-00739-5
Thi Quynh Anh Ho, Lidia Engel, Long Khanh-Dao Le, Glenn Melvin, Jemimah Ride, Ha N D Le, Cathrine Mihalopoulos
Background: Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) and best-worst scaling (BWS) profile cases (BWS case 2, or BWS-2) have been increasingly used in eliciting preferences towards health care interventions. However, it remains unclear which method is more suitable for preference elicitation, particularly in the mental health context. This study aims to compare: (1) the preference results elicited from a DCE and BWS-2; and (2) the acceptability of the two methods in the context of web-based mental health interventions (W-MHIs) for managing anxiety and depression in young people.
Methods: Participants were aged 18-25 years, lived in Australia, and self-reported experiencing anxiety and/or depression in the past 12 months. They also had either an intention to use W-MHIs or previous experience with W-MHIs for managing anxiety and/or depression. Recruitment was conducted online via social media and Deakin University notice boards. Eligible participants completed an online survey containing eight DCE and eight BWS-2 choice tasks. Both types of choice tasks comprised six attributes. A multinominal logit model was used to estimate the preference weights and relative importance of attributes. Acceptability was assessed on the basis of dropout rate, completion time, task difficulty, understanding, and participants' preferred type of choice task.
Results: A total of 198 participants (mean age: 21.42 ± 2.3 years, 64.65% female) completed the survey. Both DCE and BWS-2 predicted that cost was the most important attribute in young people's decision to engage with W-MHIs. However, the two methods differed in the relative importance of attributes and the preference ranking of levels within attributes. The DCE was perceived as easier to understand and answer, with nearly 64% of the participants preferring it over the BWS-2.
Conclusions: While both methods found cost was the most important attribute associated with engagement with W-MHIs, differences in the ranking of other attributes suggest that DCE and BWS-2 are not necessarily interchangeable. Increased acceptability by study participants of the DCE format suggests that this technique may have more merit than BWS-2-at least in the current study's context. Further research is required to identify the optimal method for determining the relative importance of attributes.
{"title":"Discrete Choice Experiment Versus Best-Worst Scaling: An Empirical Comparison in Eliciting Young People's Preferences for Web-Based Mental Health Interventions.","authors":"Thi Quynh Anh Ho, Lidia Engel, Long Khanh-Dao Le, Glenn Melvin, Jemimah Ride, Ha N D Le, Cathrine Mihalopoulos","doi":"10.1007/s40271-025-00739-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40271-025-00739-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) and best-worst scaling (BWS) profile cases (BWS case 2, or BWS-2) have been increasingly used in eliciting preferences towards health care interventions. However, it remains unclear which method is more suitable for preference elicitation, particularly in the mental health context. This study aims to compare: (1) the preference results elicited from a DCE and BWS-2; and (2) the acceptability of the two methods in the context of web-based mental health interventions (W-MHIs) for managing anxiety and depression in young people.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were aged 18-25 years, lived in Australia, and self-reported experiencing anxiety and/or depression in the past 12 months. They also had either an intention to use W-MHIs or previous experience with W-MHIs for managing anxiety and/or depression. Recruitment was conducted online via social media and Deakin University notice boards. Eligible participants completed an online survey containing eight DCE and eight BWS-2 choice tasks. Both types of choice tasks comprised six attributes. A multinominal logit model was used to estimate the preference weights and relative importance of attributes. Acceptability was assessed on the basis of dropout rate, completion time, task difficulty, understanding, and participants' preferred type of choice task.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 198 participants (mean age: 21.42 ± 2.3 years, 64.65% female) completed the survey. Both DCE and BWS-2 predicted that cost was the most important attribute in young people's decision to engage with W-MHIs. However, the two methods differed in the relative importance of attributes and the preference ranking of levels within attributes. The DCE was perceived as easier to understand and answer, with nearly 64% of the participants preferring it over the BWS-2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While both methods found cost was the most important attribute associated with engagement with W-MHIs, differences in the ranking of other attributes suggest that DCE and BWS-2 are not necessarily interchangeable. Increased acceptability by study participants of the DCE format suggests that this technique may have more merit than BWS-2-at least in the current study's context. Further research is required to identify the optimal method for determining the relative importance of attributes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51271,"journal":{"name":"Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"357-372"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170701/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144048981","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2024-02-10DOI: 10.1007/s40271-024-00673-y
Axel C Mühlbacher, Esther W de Bekker-Grob, Oliver Rivero-Arias, Bennett Levitan, Caroline Vass
In health preference research (HPR) studies, data are generated by participants'/subjects' decisions. When developing an HPR study, it is therefore important to have a clear understanding of the components of a decision and how those components stimulate participant behavior. To obtain valid and reliable results, study designers must sufficiently describe the decision model and its components. HPR studies require a detailed examination of the decision criteria, detailed documentation of the descriptive framework, and specification of hypotheses. The objects that stimulate subjects' decisions in HPR studies are defined by attributes and attribute levels. Any limitations in the identification and presentation of attributes and levels can negatively affect preference elicitation, the quality of the HPR data, and study results. This practical guide shows how to link the HPR question to an underlying decision model. It covers how to (1) construct a descriptive framework that presents relevant characteristics of a decision object and (2) specify the research hypotheses. The paper outlines steps and available methods to achieve all this, including the methods' advantages and limitations.
{"title":"How to Present a Decision Object in Health Preference Research: Attributes and Levels, the Decision Model, and the Descriptive Framework.","authors":"Axel C Mühlbacher, Esther W de Bekker-Grob, Oliver Rivero-Arias, Bennett Levitan, Caroline Vass","doi":"10.1007/s40271-024-00673-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40271-024-00673-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In health preference research (HPR) studies, data are generated by participants'/subjects' decisions. When developing an HPR study, it is therefore important to have a clear understanding of the components of a decision and how those components stimulate participant behavior. To obtain valid and reliable results, study designers must sufficiently describe the decision model and its components. HPR studies require a detailed examination of the decision criteria, detailed documentation of the descriptive framework, and specification of hypotheses. The objects that stimulate subjects' decisions in HPR studies are defined by attributes and attribute levels. Any limitations in the identification and presentation of attributes and levels can negatively affect preference elicitation, the quality of the HPR data, and study results. This practical guide shows how to link the HPR question to an underlying decision model. It covers how to (1) construct a descriptive framework that presents relevant characteristics of a decision object and (2) specify the research hypotheses. The paper outlines steps and available methods to achieve all this, including the methods' advantages and limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51271,"journal":{"name":"Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"291-302"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170727/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139716661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-05-03DOI: 10.1007/s40271-025-00740-y
Karen V MacDonald, Geoffrey C Nguyen, Maida J Sewitch, Deborah A Marshall
Background: There is limited evidence and guidance in health preferences research to prevent, identify, and manage fraudulent respondents and data fraud, especially for best-worst scaling (BWS) and discrete choice experiments with nonordered attributes. Using an example from a BWS survey in which we experienced data fraud, we aimed to: (1) develop an approach to identify, verify, and categorize fraudulent respondents; (2) assess the impact of fraudulent respondents on data and results; and (3) identify variables associated with fraudulent respondents.
Methods: An online BWS survey on healthcare services for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) was administered to Canadian IBD patients. We used a three-step approach to identify, verify, and categorize respondents as likely fraudulent (LF), likely real (LR), and unsure. First, responses to 12 "red flag" variables (variables identified as indicators of fraud) were coded 0 (pass) or 1 (fail) then summed to generate a "fraudulent response score" (FRS; range: 0-12 (most likely fraudulent)) used to categorize respondents. Second, respondents categorized LR or unsure underwent age verification. Third, categorization was updated on the basis of age verification results. BWS data were analyzed using conditional logit and latent class analysis. Subgroup analysis was done by final categorization, FRS, and red flag variables.
Results: Overall, n = 4334 respondents underwent initial categorization resulting in 24% (n = 1019) LF and 76% (n = 3315) needing further review. After review, 75% (n = 3258) were categorized as LF and n = 484 underwent age verification. Respondent categorization was updated on the basis of age verification, with final categorization of 76% (n = 3297) LF, 14% (n = 592) unsure, 10% (n = 442) LR, and < 1% (n = 3) duplicates of LR. BWS item rankings differed most by respondent category. Latent class analysis demonstrated final categorization was significantly associated with class membership; class 1 had characteristics consistent with LR respondents and item ranking order for class 1 closely aligned with LR respondent conditional logit results. Suspicious email was the most frequently failed red flag variable and was associated with fraudulent respondents.
Conclusions: Additional steps to review data and verify age resulted in better categorization than only FRS or single red flag variables. Email authentication, single use/unique survey links, and built-in identification verification may be most effective for fraud prevention. Guidance is needed on good research practices for most effective and efficient approaches for preventing, identifying, and managing fraudulent data in health preferences research, specifically in studies with nonordered attributes.
{"title":"Identifying and Managing Fraudulent Respondents in Online Stated Preferences Surveys: A Case Example from Best-Worst Scaling in Health Preferences Research.","authors":"Karen V MacDonald, Geoffrey C Nguyen, Maida J Sewitch, Deborah A Marshall","doi":"10.1007/s40271-025-00740-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40271-025-00740-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is limited evidence and guidance in health preferences research to prevent, identify, and manage fraudulent respondents and data fraud, especially for best-worst scaling (BWS) and discrete choice experiments with nonordered attributes. Using an example from a BWS survey in which we experienced data fraud, we aimed to: (1) develop an approach to identify, verify, and categorize fraudulent respondents; (2) assess the impact of fraudulent respondents on data and results; and (3) identify variables associated with fraudulent respondents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online BWS survey on healthcare services for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) was administered to Canadian IBD patients. We used a three-step approach to identify, verify, and categorize respondents as likely fraudulent (LF), likely real (LR), and unsure. First, responses to 12 \"red flag\" variables (variables identified as indicators of fraud) were coded 0 (pass) or 1 (fail) then summed to generate a \"fraudulent response score\" (FRS; range: 0-12 (most likely fraudulent)) used to categorize respondents. Second, respondents categorized LR or unsure underwent age verification. Third, categorization was updated on the basis of age verification results. BWS data were analyzed using conditional logit and latent class analysis. Subgroup analysis was done by final categorization, FRS, and red flag variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, n = 4334 respondents underwent initial categorization resulting in 24% (n = 1019) LF and 76% (n = 3315) needing further review. After review, 75% (n = 3258) were categorized as LF and n = 484 underwent age verification. Respondent categorization was updated on the basis of age verification, with final categorization of 76% (n = 3297) LF, 14% (n = 592) unsure, 10% (n = 442) LR, and < 1% (n = 3) duplicates of LR. BWS item rankings differed most by respondent category. Latent class analysis demonstrated final categorization was significantly associated with class membership; class 1 had characteristics consistent with LR respondents and item ranking order for class 1 closely aligned with LR respondent conditional logit results. Suspicious email was the most frequently failed red flag variable and was associated with fraudulent respondents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Additional steps to review data and verify age resulted in better categorization than only FRS or single red flag variables. Email authentication, single use/unique survey links, and built-in identification verification may be most effective for fraud prevention. Guidance is needed on good research practices for most effective and efficient approaches for preventing, identifying, and managing fraudulent data in health preferences research, specifically in studies with nonordered attributes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51271,"journal":{"name":"Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"373-390"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144057827","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-05-10DOI: 10.1007/s40271-025-00737-7
Lawrence Mwenge, Matthew Quaife, Lucheka Sigande, Sian Floyd, Melvin Simuyaba, Mwelwa Phiri, Chisanga Mwansa, Mutale Kabumbu, Musonda Simwinga, Kwame Shanaube, Ab Schaap, Sarah Fidler, Richard Hayes, Helen Ayles, Bernadette Hensen, Peter Hangoma
Introduction: Like in many countries, coverage of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services among adolescents and young people (AYP) aged 15-24 remains low in Zambia. Increasing coverage of SRH services requires interventions that are responsive to the needs and preferences of AYP. We conducted a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to elicit AYP's preferences for SRH service delivery in Lusaka, Zambia.
Methods: A cross-sectional DCE was conducted with AYP aged 15-24 years. Consenting participants were presented with alternative SRH service delivery strategies represented by six attributes, namely: location, type of provider, type of services, service differentiation by sex, availability of edutainment, and opening hours. Multinomial logit and random parameters logit models were used to analyse the data. All variables were effect coded.
Results: A total of 423 AYP aged 15-24 years (61% female) completed the DCE. Respondents preferred SRH services that were integrated with other healthcare services (b = 0.65, p < 0.001), delivered by medical staff and peer support workers (b = 0.44, p < 0.001), and provided at a hub within a health facility (b = 0.62, p < 0.001). AYP also preferred services to be available on weekends during the daytime (b = 0.37, p < 0.001). Participants also preferred alternatives which included edutainment (b = 0.22, p < 0.001). Service differentiation by sex had little effect on the preference for SRH service delivery (b = - 0.05, p = 0.08). The coefficient for the "neither" option was negative and statistically significant (b = - 5.31, p < 0.001), implying that AYP did not favor routine SRH service delivery in an outpatient department.
Conclusion: Efforts to increase SRH service utilization among AYP should focus on providing comprehensive SRH services that are integrated with other healthcare services. These services should be delivered by a combination of medical staff and peer supporter workers in youth-friendly spaces. Careful attention should be paid to opening times to ensure that these are convenient to AYP.
导言:与许多国家一样,赞比亚15-24岁青少年和青年的性健康和生殖健康服务覆盖率仍然很低。提高性健康和生殖健康服务的覆盖率,需要采取符合计划需要和偏好的干预措施。我们进行了一项离散选择实验(DCE),以引出赞比亚卢萨卡的AYP对SRH服务提供的偏好。方法:15 ~ 24岁AYP患者行横断面DCE。向同意的参与者展示了由六个属性表示的替代性性健康和健康服务提供策略,即:地点、提供者类型、服务类型、按性别区分的服务、教育娱乐的可用性和开放时间。采用多项logit和随机参数logit模型对数据进行分析。所有变量都进行了效果编码。结果:共有423名15-24岁的AYP(61%为女性)完成了DCE。被调查者更喜欢与其他保健服务相结合的性健康和生殖健康服务(b = 0.65, p < 0.001),由医务人员和同伴支持工作者提供(b = 0.44, p < 0.001),并在卫生机构内的中心提供(b = 0.62, p < 0.001)。AYP还倾向于在周末白天提供服务(b = 0.37, p < 0.001)。参与者还更喜欢包括寓教于乐在内的替代方案(b = 0.22, p < 0.001)。性别服务差异对SRH服务提供偏好影响不大(b = - 0.05, p = 0.08)。“两者都不是”选项的系数为负且具有统计学意义(b = - 5.31, p < 0.001),这意味着AYP不支持门诊的常规SRH服务提供。结论:提高青少年生殖健康服务利用率的重点应放在提供与其他医疗服务相结合的综合生殖健康服务上。这些服务应由医务人员和同侪支持工作者在青年友好空间共同提供。应仔细注意开放时间,以确保方便AYP。
{"title":"Co-designing Healthcare Interventions with Users: A Discrete Choice Experiment to Understand Young People's Preferences for Sexual and Reproductive Health Services in Lusaka, Zambia.","authors":"Lawrence Mwenge, Matthew Quaife, Lucheka Sigande, Sian Floyd, Melvin Simuyaba, Mwelwa Phiri, Chisanga Mwansa, Mutale Kabumbu, Musonda Simwinga, Kwame Shanaube, Ab Schaap, Sarah Fidler, Richard Hayes, Helen Ayles, Bernadette Hensen, Peter Hangoma","doi":"10.1007/s40271-025-00737-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40271-025-00737-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Like in many countries, coverage of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services among adolescents and young people (AYP) aged 15-24 remains low in Zambia. Increasing coverage of SRH services requires interventions that are responsive to the needs and preferences of AYP. We conducted a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to elicit AYP's preferences for SRH service delivery in Lusaka, Zambia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional DCE was conducted with AYP aged 15-24 years. Consenting participants were presented with alternative SRH service delivery strategies represented by six attributes, namely: location, type of provider, type of services, service differentiation by sex, availability of edutainment, and opening hours. Multinomial logit and random parameters logit models were used to analyse the data. All variables were effect coded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 423 AYP aged 15-24 years (61% female) completed the DCE. Respondents preferred SRH services that were integrated with other healthcare services (b = 0.65, p < 0.001), delivered by medical staff and peer support workers (b = 0.44, p < 0.001), and provided at a hub within a health facility (b = 0.62, p < 0.001). AYP also preferred services to be available on weekends during the daytime (b = 0.37, p < 0.001). Participants also preferred alternatives which included edutainment (b = 0.22, p < 0.001). Service differentiation by sex had little effect on the preference for SRH service delivery (b = - 0.05, p = 0.08). The coefficient for the \"neither\" option was negative and statistically significant (b = - 5.31, p < 0.001), implying that AYP did not favor routine SRH service delivery in an outpatient department.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Efforts to increase SRH service utilization among AYP should focus on providing comprehensive SRH services that are integrated with other healthcare services. These services should be delivered by a combination of medical staff and peer supporter workers in youth-friendly spaces. Careful attention should be paid to opening times to ensure that these are convenient to AYP.</p>","PeriodicalId":51271,"journal":{"name":"Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"391-402"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144059544","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-03-15DOI: 10.1007/s40271-025-00735-9
Peiwen Jiang, Deborah Street, Richard Norman, Rosalie Viney, Mark Oppe, Brendan Mulhern
Introduction: Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are increasingly applied to develop value sets for health-related quality-of-life instruments, but respondents may adopt various simplifying heuristics that affect the resulting health state values. Attribute level overlap can make these DCE tasks easier and thereby increase respondent engagement. This study uses choice tasks involving EQ-5D-5L health states to compare designs with and without overlap, constructed using different methods (generator-developed design, Ngene, SAS, and Bayesian D-efficient design) to assess respondent non-attendance to attributes.
Methods: A multi-arm DCE using the EQ-5D-5L was conducted in the Australian general population. The performance of designs with various properties was compared using the level of respondent engagement. Respondent engagement was quantified through the inferred attribute non-attendance (ANA) estimated by the equality constrained latent class model. Utility decrements derived using all respondents (i.e., including non-attendees) were compared with estimates obtained only from those who attended to all EQ-5D-5L attributes.
Results: The inclusion of overlap improved full attendance rates from 22.3-28.4% to 28.2-54.2%. Within designs with overlap, modified Fedorov designs (constructed using either Ngene or SAS macros) had higher full attendance rates than other designs. The relative attribute importance of the EQ-5D-5L also differed significantly before and after data exclusion using ANA analysis, but there was no clear pattern in the differences.
Conclusions: This study found evidence to support the use of modified Fedorov designs (constructed using Ngene or SAS) with attribute overlap to reduce ANA and improve respondent engagement in DCE studies. It highlights the potential value of ANA analysis as a quality-control tool for the inclusion and exclusion of respondents in future health valuation work for the EQ-5D-5L.
导言:离散选择实验(DCE)越来越多地被用于为与健康相关的生活质量工具开发价值集,但受访者可能会采用各种简化启发式方法,从而影响最终的健康状态值。属性水平重叠可使这些 DCE 任务变得更容易,从而提高受访者的参与度。本研究使用涉及 EQ-5D-5L 健康状态的选择任务来比较使用不同方法(生成器开发设计、Ngene、SAS 和贝叶斯 D-效率设计)构建的有重叠和无重叠的设计,以评估受访者对属性的不重视程度:方法:在澳大利亚普通人群中使用 EQ-5D-5L 进行了一项多臂 DCE。通过受访者的参与程度来比较具有不同属性的设计的性能。受访者参与度通过平等约束潜类模型估算的推断属性不参与度(ANA)进行量化。使用所有受访者(即包括未出席者)得出的效用降低与仅从出席所有 EQ-5D-5L 属性的受访者中获得的估计值进行了比较:结果:重叠设计将全勤率从 22.3-28.4% 提高到 28.2-54.2%。在有重叠的设计中,修改后的 Fedorov 设计(使用 Ngene 或 SAS 宏构建)的全勤率高于其他设计。在使用 ANA 分析法排除数据前后,EQ-5D-5L 的相对属性重要性也有显著差异,但这种差异没有明显的模式:本研究发现,有证据支持使用属性重叠的改良费多罗夫设计(使用 Ngene 或 SAS 构建)来减少 ANA 并提高 DCE 研究中受访者的参与度。它强调了 ANA 分析作为质量控制工具的潜在价值,可用于在未来的 EQ-5D-5L 健康评估工作中纳入和排除受访者。
{"title":"How do Design Characteristics Affect Respondent Engagement? Assessing Attribute Non-attendance in Discrete Choice Experiments Valuing the EQ-5D-5L.","authors":"Peiwen Jiang, Deborah Street, Richard Norman, Rosalie Viney, Mark Oppe, Brendan Mulhern","doi":"10.1007/s40271-025-00735-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40271-025-00735-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are increasingly applied to develop value sets for health-related quality-of-life instruments, but respondents may adopt various simplifying heuristics that affect the resulting health state values. Attribute level overlap can make these DCE tasks easier and thereby increase respondent engagement. This study uses choice tasks involving EQ-5D-5L health states to compare designs with and without overlap, constructed using different methods (generator-developed design, Ngene, SAS, and Bayesian D-efficient design) to assess respondent non-attendance to attributes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-arm DCE using the EQ-5D-5L was conducted in the Australian general population. The performance of designs with various properties was compared using the level of respondent engagement. Respondent engagement was quantified through the inferred attribute non-attendance (ANA) estimated by the equality constrained latent class model. Utility decrements derived using all respondents (i.e., including non-attendees) were compared with estimates obtained only from those who attended to all EQ-5D-5L attributes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The inclusion of overlap improved full attendance rates from 22.3-28.4% to 28.2-54.2%. Within designs with overlap, modified Fedorov designs (constructed using either Ngene or SAS macros) had higher full attendance rates than other designs. The relative attribute importance of the EQ-5D-5L also differed significantly before and after data exclusion using ANA analysis, but there was no clear pattern in the differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found evidence to support the use of modified Fedorov designs (constructed using Ngene or SAS) with attribute overlap to reduce ANA and improve respondent engagement in DCE studies. It highlights the potential value of ANA analysis as a quality-control tool for the inclusion and exclusion of respondents in future health valuation work for the EQ-5D-5L.</p>","PeriodicalId":51271,"journal":{"name":"Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"329-341"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170736/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143634461","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-05-02DOI: 10.1007/s40271-025-00738-6
Lucile Mulot, Fanny Monmousseau, Sophie Dubnitskiy-Robin, Maurine Diot, Pierre Marionnaud, Solène Brunet-Houdard, Bertrand Fougere
Objectives: Frailty dimensions can be evaluated in a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). As frailty is often reversible, early detection can help to maintain a person's independence. The objective of the present study was to identify organizational factors that would encourage people aged 60 years or over to agree to frailty screening.
Methods: A face-to-face discrete choice experiment was conducted to elicit older adults' preferences for five attributes of the CGA: the initiator, pre-assessment, location, schedules, and announcement of the results. To assess the relative importance of attributes and explore relationships between preferences and participant characteristics, the data were analyzed using conditional logit, mixed logit, and bivariate probit models.
Results: A total of 224 people (women: 61.2%; mean age: 72.2 years; urban dwellers: 61.6%; caregivers for other people: 35.6%) completed the survey. The CGA initiator, schedules, and location significantly influenced the respondents' preferences. The organizational preferences varied according to the respondent's quality of life and relationship with the family physician, as well as knowledge of the CGA; while agreement to attend a CGA depended on the person's gender, living environment, socioprofessional category, and caregiver status. Ideally, the CGA should be initiated by the family physician, carried out at the family physician's office or in hospital (but not at home), and split into two parts on the same day. The CGA results should preferably be presented by the healthcare professional who carried out the assessment.
Conclusions: Early frailty screening by a mobile geriatric team or specifically trained professionals in a neutral location close to the older person's home might be envisaged.
{"title":"Elderly People's Preferences for Different Organizational Models for Frailty Screening: A Discrete Choice Experiment.","authors":"Lucile Mulot, Fanny Monmousseau, Sophie Dubnitskiy-Robin, Maurine Diot, Pierre Marionnaud, Solène Brunet-Houdard, Bertrand Fougere","doi":"10.1007/s40271-025-00738-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40271-025-00738-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Frailty dimensions can be evaluated in a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). As frailty is often reversible, early detection can help to maintain a person's independence. The objective of the present study was to identify organizational factors that would encourage people aged 60 years or over to agree to frailty screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A face-to-face discrete choice experiment was conducted to elicit older adults' preferences for five attributes of the CGA: the initiator, pre-assessment, location, schedules, and announcement of the results. To assess the relative importance of attributes and explore relationships between preferences and participant characteristics, the data were analyzed using conditional logit, mixed logit, and bivariate probit models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 224 people (women: 61.2%; mean age: 72.2 years; urban dwellers: 61.6%; caregivers for other people: 35.6%) completed the survey. The CGA initiator, schedules, and location significantly influenced the respondents' preferences. The organizational preferences varied according to the respondent's quality of life and relationship with the family physician, as well as knowledge of the CGA; while agreement to attend a CGA depended on the person's gender, living environment, socioprofessional category, and caregiver status. Ideally, the CGA should be initiated by the family physician, carried out at the family physician's office or in hospital (but not at home), and split into two parts on the same day. The CGA results should preferably be presented by the healthcare professional who carried out the assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early frailty screening by a mobile geriatric team or specifically trained professionals in a neutral location close to the older person's home might be envisaged.</p>","PeriodicalId":51271,"journal":{"name":"Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"343-355"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144007813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-01Epub Date: 2025-02-27DOI: 10.1007/s40271-025-00733-x
Miriam Kimel, Leah Kleinman, Tobias Di Marco, Antonio Olivieri, Andrea Schulz, Katherine Kirk, Andrea Phillips Beyer
Purpose: The study aimed to support use of the Insomnia Daytime Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire (IDSIQ) in clinical trials for patients with concomitant insomnia disorder and nocturia.
Methods: Eligible participants in this observational study were United States (US) residents aged ≥ 55 years who experienced self-reported symptoms reflecting the diagnostic criteria for insomnia disorder and nocturia (i.e., experienced ≥ 2 nocturnal voids per night within 30 days of screening). Concept elicitation (n = 10), confirmation of limited concepts (n = 5), and cognitive debriefing of the IDSIQ (n = 10) were conducted with 20 participants. A content analysis approach was used.
Results: Most participants in the overall sample were female (n = 13/20, 65%) and white (n = 17/20, 85%), with a mean age of 60.9 years. Based on concept elicitation, most participants (n = 9/10, 90%) experienced insomnia 5-7 nights per week and nocturia 7 nights per week. Participants identified impacts to their emotions, social activities, physical abilities, cognitive function, daily activities, work, and family for insomnia disorder and nocturia. These concepts were confirmed with the five additional interviews. Concept saturation for both disorders was achieved in all participants by the seventh concept elicitation interview. All cognitive interview participants (n = 10) understood the IDSIQ instructions, items, and response options.
Conclusions: Having concurrent insomnia disorder and nocturia is associated with daytime symptoms and impacts to functioning. All participants who were debriefed understood all IDSIQ items and response options. These findings suggest the IDSIQ is a content-valid instrument for use in clinical trials with patients with insomnia and comorbid nocturia.
{"title":"Content Validity Assessment of the Insomnia Daytime Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire (IDSIQ) Among Adults with Insomnia and Nocturia.","authors":"Miriam Kimel, Leah Kleinman, Tobias Di Marco, Antonio Olivieri, Andrea Schulz, Katherine Kirk, Andrea Phillips Beyer","doi":"10.1007/s40271-025-00733-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40271-025-00733-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study aimed to support use of the Insomnia Daytime Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire (IDSIQ) in clinical trials for patients with concomitant insomnia disorder and nocturia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible participants in this observational study were United States (US) residents aged ≥ 55 years who experienced self-reported symptoms reflecting the diagnostic criteria for insomnia disorder and nocturia (i.e., experienced ≥ 2 nocturnal voids per night within 30 days of screening). Concept elicitation (n = 10), confirmation of limited concepts (n = 5), and cognitive debriefing of the IDSIQ (n = 10) were conducted with 20 participants. A content analysis approach was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants in the overall sample were female (n = 13/20, 65%) and white (n = 17/20, 85%), with a mean age of 60.9 years. Based on concept elicitation, most participants (n = 9/10, 90%) experienced insomnia 5-7 nights per week and nocturia 7 nights per week. Participants identified impacts to their emotions, social activities, physical abilities, cognitive function, daily activities, work, and family for insomnia disorder and nocturia. These concepts were confirmed with the five additional interviews. Concept saturation for both disorders was achieved in all participants by the seventh concept elicitation interview. All cognitive interview participants (n = 10) understood the IDSIQ instructions, items, and response options.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Having concurrent insomnia disorder and nocturia is associated with daytime symptoms and impacts to functioning. All participants who were debriefed understood all IDSIQ items and response options. These findings suggest the IDSIQ is a content-valid instrument for use in clinical trials with patients with insomnia and comorbid nocturia.</p>","PeriodicalId":51271,"journal":{"name":"Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"249-261"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11985609/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143517259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-01Epub Date: 2025-02-03DOI: 10.1007/s40271-025-00729-7
Andrew Simon Gilbert, Frances Batchelor, Nancy Devlin, Briony Dow, Brendan Mulhern, Rosalie Viney, Tessa Peasgood, Lidia Engel
Background and objectives: There is interest in routinely measuring quality of life (QoL) in aged care homes, evidenced by the Australian Government's implementation of QoL as a mandatory quality indicator. This study explores views of aged care staff, residents, and family members on the benefits, challenges, and feasibility of implementing routine QoL measures.
Methods: Qualitative data were gathered to explore staff, resident, and family perspectives on QoL measurement in aged care homes, including purpose, benefits, implementation, and best practice. Two staff workshops were conducted at different aged care homes, and semi-structured interviews were held with 29 proxies (9 family members and 20 staff) and 24 residents. Workshops and interviews were transcribed verbatim, and thematically analysed via a qualitative interpretive approach using NVivo software.
Results: Analysis yielded four key themes: (1) benefits of routine QoL measurement; (2) challenges in implementation; (3) best practice for collecting surveys; (4) validity concerns. Identified benefits included potentially improved care, monitoring service performance, and informing family members. Staff participants recommended integrating measures into existing care planning and having oversight from a registered nurse. Participants identified potential implementation challenges, including administrative burden, time and resourcing constraints, conflicts of interest, and resistance from staff, providers, and residents.
Conclusions: This study identifies potential benefits to implementing routine QoL measurement in residential aged care homes. To maximise these benefits, it is important to consider how measurement can be integrated in ways that contribute to existing care planning and practices.
{"title":"Routine Quality-of-Life Measurement in Residential Aged Care: Staff, Resident, and Family Perspectives.","authors":"Andrew Simon Gilbert, Frances Batchelor, Nancy Devlin, Briony Dow, Brendan Mulhern, Rosalie Viney, Tessa Peasgood, Lidia Engel","doi":"10.1007/s40271-025-00729-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40271-025-00729-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>There is interest in routinely measuring quality of life (QoL) in aged care homes, evidenced by the Australian Government's implementation of QoL as a mandatory quality indicator. This study explores views of aged care staff, residents, and family members on the benefits, challenges, and feasibility of implementing routine QoL measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative data were gathered to explore staff, resident, and family perspectives on QoL measurement in aged care homes, including purpose, benefits, implementation, and best practice. Two staff workshops were conducted at different aged care homes, and semi-structured interviews were held with 29 proxies (9 family members and 20 staff) and 24 residents. Workshops and interviews were transcribed verbatim, and thematically analysed via a qualitative interpretive approach using NVivo software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis yielded four key themes: (1) benefits of routine QoL measurement; (2) challenges in implementation; (3) best practice for collecting surveys; (4) validity concerns. Identified benefits included potentially improved care, monitoring service performance, and informing family members. Staff participants recommended integrating measures into existing care planning and having oversight from a registered nurse. Participants identified potential implementation challenges, including administrative burden, time and resourcing constraints, conflicts of interest, and resistance from staff, providers, and residents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identifies potential benefits to implementing routine QoL measurement in residential aged care homes. To maximise these benefits, it is important to consider how measurement can be integrated in ways that contribute to existing care planning and practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":51271,"journal":{"name":"Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"211-223"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11985636/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143082004","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-01Epub Date: 2025-03-14DOI: 10.1007/s40271-025-00731-z
Alicia J King, Tiffany R Phillips, Erica L Plummer, Natasha Wild, Christopher K Fairley, Eric P F Chow, Lenka A Vodstrcil, Catriona S Bradshaw
Introduction: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a common condition that affects the sexual wellbeing of women and other people with a vagina. Recurrence following individual treatment is frequent and exerts a cumulative burden over time. Researchers at the Melbourne Sexual Health Center have recently completed the first successful trial of male partner treatment (MPT) for BV, demonstrating the superior effectiveness of concurrent MPT in reducing recurrence.
Method: Using a case study design, semi-structured interviews with trial participants explored the views and experiences of nine men who had received MPT and nine women whose partners had received MPT. Action and emotion coding were employed to create an explanatory model of experiences of BV recurrence and MPT.
Results: Three key themes within this model related to the cycle of recurrent BV: the physical, psychological, and relationship impacts of BV ("experiencing BV"); the importance of healthcare providers exploring different options and understanding individual context ("seeking care"); and the frustration, cost, and inconvenience of individual treatment ("dealing with it alone"). This cycle was broken by "Getting everyone on board" with MPT. This involved women, men, and healthcare professionals understanding BV and MPT, overcoming barriers to access, and open communication between partners. These factors, in combination, resulted in couples "dealing with BV together", undertaking a week of inconvenience to share the responsibility of preventing recurrence.
Conclusion: These findings suggest that the widescale adoption of MPT for BV will require multilevel approaches to address gaps in the awareness of BV with sensitivity to the relational, social, and structural context of delivering care.
{"title":"Getting Everyone on Board to Break the Cycle of Bacterial Vaginosis (BV) Recurrence: A Qualitative Study of Partner Treatment for BV.","authors":"Alicia J King, Tiffany R Phillips, Erica L Plummer, Natasha Wild, Christopher K Fairley, Eric P F Chow, Lenka A Vodstrcil, Catriona S Bradshaw","doi":"10.1007/s40271-025-00731-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40271-025-00731-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a common condition that affects the sexual wellbeing of women and other people with a vagina. Recurrence following individual treatment is frequent and exerts a cumulative burden over time. Researchers at the Melbourne Sexual Health Center have recently completed the first successful trial of male partner treatment (MPT) for BV, demonstrating the superior effectiveness of concurrent MPT in reducing recurrence.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using a case study design, semi-structured interviews with trial participants explored the views and experiences of nine men who had received MPT and nine women whose partners had received MPT. Action and emotion coding were employed to create an explanatory model of experiences of BV recurrence and MPT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three key themes within this model related to the cycle of recurrent BV: the physical, psychological, and relationship impacts of BV (\"experiencing BV\"); the importance of healthcare providers exploring different options and understanding individual context (\"seeking care\"); and the frustration, cost, and inconvenience of individual treatment (\"dealing with it alone\"). This cycle was broken by \"Getting everyone on board\" with MPT. This involved women, men, and healthcare professionals understanding BV and MPT, overcoming barriers to access, and open communication between partners. These factors, in combination, resulted in couples \"dealing with BV together\", undertaking a week of inconvenience to share the responsibility of preventing recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that the widescale adoption of MPT for BV will require multilevel approaches to address gaps in the awareness of BV with sensitivity to the relational, social, and structural context of delivering care.</p>","PeriodicalId":51271,"journal":{"name":"Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"279-290"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11985585/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143630306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}