Martina Ferioli, Federica Medici, Ludovica Forlani, Savino Cilla, Bruno Fionda, Silvia Cammelli, Luca Tagliaferri, Alessio G. Morganti, Milly Buwenge
Brachytherapy (BRT) plays a pivotal role in the treatment of tumors, offering precise radiation therapy directly to the affected area. However, this technique demands extensive training and skills development, posing challenges for widespread adoption and ensuring patient safety. This narrative review explored the utilization of augmented reality (AR) in BRT, seeking to summarize existing evidence, discuss key findings, limitations, and quality of research as well as outline future research directions. The review revealed promising findings regarding the integration of AR in BRT. Studies have suggested the feasibility and potential benefits of AR in education, training, intra-operative guidance, and treatment planning. However, the evidence remains limited and heterogeneous, with most studies in preliminary phases. Standardization, prospective clinical trials, patient-centered outcomes assessment, and cost-effectiveness analysis emerge as critical areas for future research. Augmented reality holds transformative potential for BRT by enhancing precision, safety, and training efficiency. To fully implement these benefits, the field requires standardized protocols, rigorous clinical trials, and in-depth patient-centered investigations. Policy-makers and healthcare providers should closely monitor developments in AR and consider its implementation in clinical practice, contingent and robust evidence, and cost-effectiveness analysis. The pro-active pursuit of evidence-based practices will contribute to optimizing patient care in BRT.
近距离放射治疗（BRT）在肿瘤治疗中发挥着举足轻重的作用，可直接对患处进行精确的放射治疗。然而，这项技术需要大量的培训和技能开发，给广泛应用和确保患者安全带来了挑战。这篇叙述性综述探讨了增强现实（AR）在 BRT 中的应用，旨在总结现有证据，讨论主要发现、局限性和研究质量，并概述未来的研究方向。综述显示，在快速公交中整合 AR 的研究结果很有前景。研究表明，AR 在教育、培训、术中指导和治疗规划方面具有可行性和潜在优势。然而，证据仍然有限且不尽相同，大多数研究还处于初步阶段。标准化、前瞻性临床试验、以患者为中心的结果评估和成本效益分析成为未来研究的关键领域。增强现实技术通过提高精确度、安全性和训练效率，为 BRT 带来了变革性的潜力。要充分实现这些优势，该领域需要标准化方案、严格的临床试验和以患者为中心的深入调查。政策制定者和医疗服务提供者应密切关注 AR 的发展，并考虑其在临床实践中的应用、应急和有力的证据以及成本效益分析。积极追求循证实践将有助于优化 BRT 患者护理。
{"title":"Augmented reality in brachytherapy: A narrative review","authors":"Martina Ferioli, Federica Medici, Ludovica Forlani, Savino Cilla, Bruno Fionda, Silvia Cammelli, Luca Tagliaferri, Alessio G. Morganti, Milly Buwenge","doi":"10.5114/jcb.2024.137779","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2024.137779","url":null,"abstract":"Brachytherapy (BRT) plays a pivotal role in the treatment of tumors, offering precise radiation therapy directly to the affected area. However, this technique demands extensive training and skills development, posing challenges for widespread adoption and ensuring patient safety. This narrative review explored the utilization of augmented reality (AR) in BRT, seeking to summarize existing evidence, discuss key findings, limitations, and quality of research as well as outline future research directions. The review revealed promising findings regarding the integration of AR in BRT. Studies have suggested the feasibility and potential benefits of AR in education, training, intra-operative guidance, and treatment planning. However, the evidence remains limited and heterogeneous, with most studies in preliminary phases. Standardization, prospective clinical trials, patient-centered outcomes assessment, and cost-effectiveness analysis emerge as critical areas for future research. Augmented reality holds transformative potential for BRT by enhancing precision, safety, and training efficiency. To fully implement these benefits, the field requires standardized protocols, rigorous clinical trials, and in-depth patient-centered investigations. Policy-makers and healthcare providers should closely monitor developments in AR and consider its implementation in clinical practice, contingent and robust evidence, and cost-effectiveness analysis. The pro-active pursuit of evidence-based practices will contribute to optimizing patient care in BRT.","PeriodicalId":51305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140324585","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: To use failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) to identify failure modes for gynecological high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy pathway and score with severity, occurrence, and detectability.
Material and methods: A research team was organized to observe gynecological HDR brachytherapy pathway, and draw detailed process map to identify all potential failure modes (FMs). The whole team scored FMs based on three parameters, including occurrence (O), detectability (D), and severity (S), and then multiplied three scores to obtain risk priority number (RPN). All FMs were ranked according to RPNs and/or severity scores, and FMs with the highest RPN scores (> 100) and severity scores (> 8) were selected for in-depth analysis. Fault tree analysis (FTA) was applied to find progenitor causes of high-risk FMs and their propagation path, and determine which steps in the process need to be changed and optimized. Efficiency of each existing preventive methods to detect and stop FMs was analyzed, and proposals to improve quality management (QM) and ensure patient safety were suggested.
Results: The whole gynecological HDR brachytherapy pathway consisted of 5 sub-processes and 30 specific steps, in which 57 FMs were identified. Twelve high-risk FMs were found, including 7 FMs with RPNs > 100 and 5 FMs with severity scores > 8. For these FMs, 2 were in the insertion stage, 1 in the imaging stage, 4 in the treatment planning stage, and 5 in the final stage of treatment delivery. The most serious of these FMs was the change in organ at risk (OAR) during treatment delivery (RPN = 245.7). The FM that occurred most frequently was the applicator shift during patient transfer.
Conclusions: Failure modes and effects analysis is a prospective risk-based tool that can identity high-risk steps before failures occur, provide preventive measures to stop their occurrence, and improve quality management system.
{"title":"Clinical implementation of failure modes and effects analysis for gynecological high-dose-rate brachytherapy","authors":"Siyao Liu, Emma Jones","doi":"10.5114/jcb.2024.136295","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2024.136295","url":null,"abstract":"<b>Purpose:</b><br/>To use failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) to identify failure modes for gynecological high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy pathway and score with severity, occurrence, and detectability.<br/><br/><b>Material and methods:</b><br/>A research team was organized to observe gynecological HDR brachytherapy pathway, and draw detailed process map to identify all potential failure modes (FMs). The whole team scored FMs based on three parameters, including occurrence (O), detectability (D), and severity (S), and then multiplied three scores to obtain risk priority number (RPN). All FMs were ranked according to RPNs and/or severity scores, and FMs with the highest RPN scores (> 100) and severity scores (> 8) were selected for in-depth analysis. Fault tree analysis (FTA) was applied to find progenitor causes of high-risk FMs and their propagation path, and determine which steps in the process need to be changed and optimized. Efficiency of each existing preventive methods to detect and stop FMs was analyzed, and proposals to improve quality management (QM) and ensure patient safety were suggested.<br/><br/><b>Results:</b><br/>The whole gynecological HDR brachytherapy pathway consisted of 5 sub-processes and 30 specific steps, in which 57 FMs were identified. Twelve high-risk FMs were found, including 7 FMs with RPNs > 100 and 5 FMs with severity scores > 8. For these FMs, 2 were in the insertion stage, 1 in the imaging stage, 4 in the treatment planning stage, and 5 in the final stage of treatment delivery. The most serious of these FMs was the change in organ at risk (OAR) during treatment delivery (RPN = 245.7). The FM that occurred most frequently was the applicator shift during patient transfer.<br/><br/><b>Conclusions:</b><br/>Failure modes and effects analysis is a prospective risk-based tool that can identity high-risk steps before failures occur, provide preventive measures to stop their occurrence, and improve quality management system.<br/><br/>","PeriodicalId":51305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140324510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rasla Parween, Aruna R, Chendil V, Mahita Reddy, Ramyaa S, Varun Chandra, Yuvaraj U, Amrut S Kadam
Purpose: Brachytherapy plays a crucial role in the standard of care for locally advanced gynecological malignancies. In this report, we present the experience from a tertiary teaching hospital, which is a referral center for image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) in the management of locally advanced gynecological malignancies.
Material and methods: This was a retrospective study of 130 patients referred to our hospital for IGBT after receiving initial external beam radiotherapy in their primary healthcare facilities, from January 2021 till January 2023. CT-based planning was done to delineate high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV). Dose of 6-7.5 Gy in 3-4 fractions was prescribed. Overall treatment time (OTT) was calculated, and patients were assessed for clinical response and toxicity after three months.
Results: All patients received IGBT using an intra-cavitary or interstitial technique. The D90 HR-CTV mean EQD2 dose was 28.34 ±2.78 Gy. The mean EQD2 dose to 2 cc of the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid was 18.31 ±5.19 Gy, 14.14 ±5.76 Gy, and 17.43 ±4.75 Gy, respectively. The median interval time between the last fraction of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and first evaluation in the hospital was 19 (range, 13-28) days (interquartile range [IQR]). The median time between the completion of chemoradiation and brachytherapy procedure was 25 (range, 19-33) days (IQR). The mean overall treatment time (OTT) was 63.5 ±14.7 days.
Conclusions: This study highlights the established advantages of image-guided interstitial brachytherapy and associated challenges. To optimize the overall treatment duration, it is imperative to prioritize and update the referral processes for brachytherapy centers.
{"title":"Brachytherapy in gynecological malignancies at a tertiary care hospital: An analysis","authors":"Rasla Parween, Aruna R, Chendil V, Mahita Reddy, Ramyaa S, Varun Chandra, Yuvaraj U, Amrut S Kadam","doi":"10.5114/jcb.2024.135628","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2024.135628","url":null,"abstract":"<b>Purpose:</b><br/>Brachytherapy plays a crucial role in the standard of care for locally advanced gynecological malignancies. In this report, we present the experience from a tertiary teaching hospital, which is a referral center for image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) in the management of locally advanced gynecological malignancies.<br/><br/><b>Material and methods:</b><br/>This was a retrospective study of 130 patients referred to our hospital for IGBT after receiving initial external beam radiotherapy in their primary healthcare facilities, from January 2021 till January 2023. CT-based planning was done to delineate high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV). Dose of 6-7.5 Gy in 3-4 fractions was prescribed. Overall treatment time (OTT) was calculated, and patients were assessed for clinical response and toxicity after three months.<br/><br/><b>Results:</b><br/>All patients received IGBT using an intra-cavitary or interstitial technique. The D<sub>90</sub> HR-CTV mean EQD<sub>2</sub> dose was 28.34 ±2.78 Gy. The mean EQD<sub>2</sub> dose to 2 cc of the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid was 18.31 ±5.19 Gy, 14.14 ±5.76 Gy, and 17.43 ±4.75 Gy, respectively. The median interval time between the last fraction of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and first evaluation in the hospital was 19 (range, 13-28) days (interquartile range [IQR]). The median time between the completion of chemoradiation and brachytherapy procedure was 25 (range, 19-33) days (IQR). The mean overall treatment time (OTT) was 63.5 ±14.7 days.<br/><br/><b>Conclusions:</b><br/>This study highlights the established advantages of image-guided interstitial brachytherapy and associated challenges. To optimize the overall treatment duration, it is imperative to prioritize and update the referral processes for brachytherapy centers.<br/><br/>","PeriodicalId":51305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140324584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marta Gimeno-Morales, Laura Motisi, Natalia Rodriguez-Spiteri, Fernando Martínez-Regueira, Tucker Worthington, Vratislav Strnad, Jean Michel Hannoun-Levi, Cristina Gutierrez
Purpose: Breast brachytherapy (BB) represents an important radiation therapy modality in modern breast cancer treatments. Currently, BB is mainly used for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), local boost after whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT), and as salvage re-irradiation after second lumpectomy (APBrl). Two multi-catheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIB) techniques can be offered: intra-operative (IOB) and post-operative (POB) brachytherapy. The aim of this article was to summarize current available data on these two different brachytherapy approaches for breast cancer.
Material and methods: A literature search was performed, and different experiences published by BB expert teams were analyzed and compared. These two different brachytherapy approaches for breast cancer have also been presented and discussed during meetings of the GEC-ESTRO BCWG. In addition, expert recommendations were defined.
Results: A comprehensive description and practical comparison of both the techniques, i.e., IOB and POB, considering the latest available published data were presented. Different technical, logistic, and clinical aspects of both the methods were thoroughly examined and analyzed. This detailed comparison of the two breast brachytherapy techniques was supported by scientific data from extensive experience of experts, facilitating an objective analysis that, to our knowledge, has not been previously published.
Conclusions: Based on the comprehensive analysis of both the brachytherapy techniques available, this article serves as a valuable resource to guide breast teams in selecting the optimal BB technique (POB or IOB), considering hospital environment, multi-disciplinary collaboration, and patient logistics.
{"title":"Post- versus intra-operative implant for breast cancer interstitial brachytherapy: How to choose?","authors":"Marta Gimeno-Morales, Laura Motisi, Natalia Rodriguez-Spiteri, Fernando Martínez-Regueira, Tucker Worthington, Vratislav Strnad, Jean Michel Hannoun-Levi, Cristina Gutierrez","doi":"10.5114/jcb.2024.135635","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2024.135635","url":null,"abstract":"<b>Purpose:</b><br/>Breast brachytherapy (BB) represents an important radiation therapy modality in modern breast cancer treatments. Currently, BB is mainly used for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), local boost after whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT), and as salvage re-irradiation after second lumpectomy (APBrl). Two multi-catheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIB) techniques can be offered: intra-operative (IOB) and post-operative (POB) brachytherapy. The aim of this article was to summarize current available data on these two different brachytherapy approaches for breast cancer.<br/><br/><b>Material and methods:</b><br/>A literature search was performed, and different experiences published by BB expert teams were analyzed and compared. These two different brachytherapy approaches for breast cancer have also been presented and discussed during meetings of the GEC-ESTRO BCWG. In addition, expert recommendations were defined.<br/><br/><b>Results:</b><br/>A comprehensive description and practical comparison of both the techniques, i.e., IOB and POB, considering the latest available published data were presented. Different technical, logistic, and clinical aspects of both the methods were thoroughly examined and analyzed. This detailed comparison of the two breast brachytherapy techniques was supported by scientific data from extensive experience of experts, facilitating an objective analysis that, to our knowledge, has not been previously published.<br/><br/><b>Conclusions:</b><br/>Based on the comprehensive analysis of both the brachytherapy techniques available, this article serves as a valuable resource to guide breast teams in selecting the optimal BB technique (POB or IOB), considering hospital environment, multi-disciplinary collaboration, and patient logistics.<br/><br/>","PeriodicalId":51305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140324508","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Michael J. Lavelle, Evangelia Kaza, Christian V. Guthier, Desmond A. O’Farrell, Thomas C. Harris, Robert A. Cormack, Phillip M. Devlin, Ivan M. Buzurovic
Purpose: Best practices for high-dose-rate surface applicator brachytherapy treatment (SABT) have long relied on computed tomography (CT)-based imaging to visualize diseased sites for treatment planning. Compared with magnetic resonance (MR)-based imaging, CT provides insufficient soft tissue contrast. This work described the feasibility of clinical implementation of MR-based imaging in SABT planning to provide individualized treatment optimization.
Material and methods: A 3D-printed phantom was used to fit Freiberg flap-style (Elekta, The Netherlands) applicator. Images were taken using an optimized pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition (PETRA) MR sequence for catheter visualization, and a helical CT scan to generate parallel treatment plans. This clinical study included three patients undergoing SABT for Dupuytren’s contracture/palmar fascial fibromatosis imaged with the same modalities. SABT planning was performed in Oncentra Brachy (Elekta Brachytherapy, The Netherlands) treatment planning software. A geometric analysis was conducted by comparing CT-based digitization with MR-based digitization. CT and MR dwell positions underwent a rigid registration, and average Euclidean distances between dwell positions were calculated. A dosimetric comparison was performed, including point-based dose difference calculations and volumetric segmentations with Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) calculations.
Results: Euclidean distances between dwell positions from CT-based and MR-based plans were on average 0.68 ±0.05 mm and 1.35 ±0.17 mm for the phantom and patients, respectively. The point dose difference calculations were on average 0.92% for the phantom and 1.98% for the patients. The D95 and D90 DSC calculations were both 97.9% for the phantom, and on average 93.6% and 94.2%, respectively, for the patients.
Conclusions: The sub-millimeter accuracy of dwell positions and high DSC’s (> 0.95) of the phantom demonstrated that digitization was clinically acceptable, and accurate treatment plans were produced using MR-only imaging. This novel approach, MRI-guided SABT, will lead to individualized prescriptions for potentially improved patient outcomes.
{"title":"Feasibility and clinical implementation of MRI-guided surface brachytherapy","authors":"Michael J. Lavelle, Evangelia Kaza, Christian V. Guthier, Desmond A. O’Farrell, Thomas C. Harris, Robert A. Cormack, Phillip M. Devlin, Ivan M. Buzurovic","doi":"10.5114/jcb.2024.135647","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2024.135647","url":null,"abstract":"<b>Purpose:</b><br/>Best practices for high-dose-rate surface applicator brachytherapy treatment (SABT) have long relied on computed tomography (CT)-based imaging to visualize diseased sites for treatment planning. Compared with magnetic resonance (MR)-based imaging, CT provides insufficient soft tissue contrast. This work described the feasibility of clinical implementation of MR-based imaging in SABT planning to provide individualized treatment optimization.<br/><br/><b>Material and methods:</b><br/>A 3D-printed phantom was used to fit Freiberg flap-style (Elekta, The Netherlands) applicator. Images were taken using an optimized pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition (PETRA) MR sequence for catheter visualization, and a helical CT scan to generate parallel treatment plans. This clinical study included three patients undergoing SABT for Dupuytren’s contracture/palmar fascial fibromatosis imaged with the same modalities. SABT planning was performed in Oncentra Brachy (Elekta Brachytherapy, The Netherlands) treatment planning software. A geometric analysis was conducted by comparing CT-based digitization with MR-based digitization. CT and MR dwell positions underwent a rigid registration, and average Euclidean distances between dwell positions were calculated. A dosimetric comparison was performed, including point-based dose difference calculations and volumetric segmentations with Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) calculations.<br/><br/><b>Results:</b><br/>Euclidean distances between dwell positions from CT-based and MR-based plans were on average 0.68 ±0.05 mm and 1.35 ±0.17 mm for the phantom and patients, respectively. The point dose difference calculations were on average 0.92% for the phantom and 1.98% for the patients. The D<sub>95</sub> and D<sub>90</sub> DSC calculations were both 97.9% for the phantom, and on average 93.6% and 94.2%, respectively, for the patients.<br/><br/><b>Conclusions:</b><br/>The sub-millimeter accuracy of dwell positions and high DSC’s (> 0.95) of the phantom demonstrated that digitization was clinically acceptable, and accurate treatment plans were produced using MR-only imaging. This novel approach, MRI-guided SABT, will lead to individualized prescriptions for potentially improved patient outcomes.<br/><br/>","PeriodicalId":51305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140324588","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: To evaluate international prostate symptom score and urinary quality of life in patients with prostate cancer who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy, and to identify lower urinary tract symptoms that must be improved to enhance post-operative urinary quality of life and factors associated with lower urinary tract symptoms.
Material and methods: This study included 193 patients who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy alone (145 Gy). Importance–performance analysis was conducted to identify lower urinary tract symptoms that should be prioritized to improve urinary quality of life. Association between lower urinary tract symptom scores and each factor was investigated. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to evaluate dosimetric parameters related to lower urinary tract symptom score to predict an average score of ≥ 3. Cut-off values were determined.
Results: One to nine months post-implantation was a period of significantly increased urinary quality of life scores compared with baseline (p < 0.05 each). The importance–performance analysis conducted for 1-9 months revealed that frequency, nocturia, and weak stream required improvement. Multivariate analysis showed that each lower urinary tract symptom score presented a significant association with its baseline value (p < 0.001 each, positive correlation). Frequency, incomplete emptying, urgency, and straining scores were significantly associated with prostate volume, whereas weak stream and intermittency scores were associated with dose covering 90% of the prostate and dose covering 90% of the urethra, respectively (p < 0.05 each, positive correlations). Cut-off values for these doses were 167.01 Gy and 136.84 Gy, respectively.
Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of prioritizing specific lower urinary tract symptoms for improvement in post-operative urinary quality of life, and identifies the associated factors that can help in personalized treatment planning and goal-setting for better patient satisfaction.
{"title":"Urinary tract symptoms that should be improved to enhance post-operative urinary quality of life in patients treated with low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer: An importance–performance analysis","authors":"Takayuki Sakurai, Shigeyuki Takamatsu, Satoshi Shibata, Risako Minamikawa, Masahiro Yamazaki, Akihito Okubo, Risa Nagaoka, Tomoyuki Makino, Renato Naito, Hiroshi Yaegashi, Atsushi Mizokami, Satoshi Kobayashi","doi":"10.5114/jcb.2024.135646","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2024.135646","url":null,"abstract":"<b>Purpose:</b><br/>To evaluate international prostate symptom score and urinary quality of life in patients with prostate cancer who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy, and to identify lower urinary tract symptoms that must be improved to enhance post-operative urinary quality of life and factors associated with lower urinary tract symptoms.<br/><br/><b>Material and methods:</b><br/>This study included 193 patients who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy alone (145 Gy). Importance–performance analysis was conducted to identify lower urinary tract symptoms that should be prioritized to improve urinary quality of life. Association between lower urinary tract symptom scores and each factor was investigated. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to evaluate dosimetric parameters related to lower urinary tract symptom score to predict an average score of ≥ 3. Cut-off values were determined.<br/><br/><b>Results:</b><br/>One to nine months post-implantation was a period of significantly increased urinary quality of life scores compared with baseline (<i>p</i> < 0.05 each). The importance–performance analysis conducted for 1-9 months revealed that frequency, nocturia, and weak stream required improvement. Multivariate analysis showed that each lower urinary tract symptom score presented a significant association with its baseline value (<i>p</i> < 0.001 each, positive correlation). Frequency, incomplete emptying, urgency, and straining scores were significantly associated with prostate volume, whereas weak stream and intermittency scores were associated with dose covering 90% of the prostate and dose covering 90% of the urethra, respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.05 each, positive correlations). Cut-off values for these doses were 167.01 Gy and 136.84 Gy, respectively.<br/><br/><b>Conclusions:</b><br/>This study highlights the importance of prioritizing specific lower urinary tract symptoms for improvement in post-operative urinary quality of life, and identifies the associated factors that can help in personalized treatment planning and goal-setting for better patient satisfaction.<br/><br/>","PeriodicalId":51305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140325699","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Horatio Thomas, Jie Jane Chen, Haitham Shaheen, Ali Sabbagh, Hasan Abdul-Baki, Oi Wai Chau, Nauman Malik, Alan Ayoub, Comron Hassanzadeh, I-Chow Hsu, Osama Mohamad
Introduction: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a relative contraindication to external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for prostate cancer patients due to fear of increased risk of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy, capable of minimizing radiation dose to surrounding tissues, is a feasible alternative. Given limited data, this study examined the safety profile of HDR brachytherapy in this setting.
Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with localized prostate cancer and IBD treated with HDR brachytherapy at the University of California San Francisco (UCSF), between 2010 and 2022. Eligibility criteria included biopsy-proven prostate cancer, no distant metastases, absence of prior pelvic radiotherapy, IBD diagnosis, and at least one follow-up visit post-treatment.
Results: Eleven patients were included, with a median follow-up of 28.7 months. The median dose administered was 2700 cGy (range, 1500-3150 cGy) over 2 fractions (range, 1-3 fractions). Two patients also received EBRT. Rectal spacers (SpaceOAR) were applied in seven patients. All patients experienced acute genitourinary (GU) toxicity, ten of which were grade 1 and one was grade 2. Eight patients experienced late grade 1 GU toxicity, and three patients had late grade 2 GU toxicity. GI toxicities were similarly low-grade, with six grade 1 acute toxicity, no grade 2 or higher acute toxicity, six grade 1 late toxicity, and one late grade 2 GI toxicity. No grade 3 or higher acute or late GI or GU toxicities were reported.
Conclusions: HDR brachytherapy appears to be a safe and tolerable treatment modality for patients with prostate cancer and IBD, with minimal acute and late GI and GU toxicity. These findings warrant multi-institutional validation due to small sample size.
{"title":"Safety of high-dose-rate brachytherapy in patients with prostate cancer and inflammatory bowel disease: A case series","authors":"Horatio Thomas, Jie Jane Chen, Haitham Shaheen, Ali Sabbagh, Hasan Abdul-Baki, Oi Wai Chau, Nauman Malik, Alan Ayoub, Comron Hassanzadeh, I-Chow Hsu, Osama Mohamad","doi":"10.5114/jcb.2024.135645","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2024.135645","url":null,"abstract":"<b>Introduction:</b><br/>Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a relative contraindication to external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for prostate cancer patients due to fear of increased risk of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy, capable of minimizing radiation dose to surrounding tissues, is a feasible alternative. Given limited data, this study examined the safety profile of HDR brachytherapy in this setting.<br/><br/><b>Material and methods:</b><br/>We conducted a retrospective review of patients with localized prostate cancer and IBD treated with HDR brachytherapy at the University of California San Francisco (UCSF), between 2010 and 2022. Eligibility criteria included biopsy-proven prostate cancer, no distant metastases, absence of prior pelvic radiotherapy, IBD diagnosis, and at least one follow-up visit post-treatment.<br/><br/><b>Results:</b><br/>Eleven patients were included, with a median follow-up of 28.7 months. The median dose administered was 2700 cGy (range, 1500-3150 cGy) over 2 fractions (range, 1-3 fractions). Two patients also received EBRT. Rectal spacers (SpaceOAR) were applied in seven patients. All patients experienced acute genitourinary (GU) toxicity, ten of which were grade 1 and one was grade 2. Eight patients experienced late grade 1 GU toxicity, and three patients had late grade 2 GU toxicity. GI toxicities were similarly low-grade, with six grade 1 acute toxicity, no grade 2 or higher acute toxicity, six grade 1 late toxicity, and one late grade 2 GI toxicity. No grade 3 or higher acute or late GI or GU toxicities were reported.<br/><br/><b>Conclusions:</b><br/>HDR brachytherapy appears to be a safe and tolerable treatment modality for patients with prostate cancer and IBD, with minimal acute and late GI and GU toxicity. These findings warrant multi-institutional validation due to small sample size.<br/><br/>","PeriodicalId":51305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140325715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alexander Armstrong, Huong Ho, Mark Tacey, Damien Bolton, Yee Chan, Alwin Tan, Chee Wee Cham, Trung Pham, Kevin McMillan, George Koufogiannis, Paul Manohar, Mario Guerrieri, Michael Ng, Daryl Lim Joon, Farshad Foroudi, Mun Yee Tan, Michael Chao
Purpose: Low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy in young men remains controversial amongst urologists due to their concerns regarding long-term biochemical control and treatment-related toxicities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the treatment outcomes of men under 60 years of age who underwent LDR brachytherapy with iodine-125 (125I) for clinically localized low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
Material and methods: All consecutive patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated at our institution from 2003 to 2016 with 125I monotherapy were included in the study. Prescription dose was 145.0 Gy modified peripheral loading (MPD). All patients were assessed for biochemical progression-free survival using Phoenix definition (nadir +2 ng/ml), clinical progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), and any associated treatment toxicity.
Results: A total of 161 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 6.8 years (range, 3-14.54 years). Median age at implant was 57 years (range, 53-59 years). Mean prostate specific antigen (PSA) level at diagnosis was 4.43 ng/ml (SD = 2.29). Majority of men had low-risk prostate cancer (70.2%). Biochemical progression-free survival at 8 years was 94% for the entire cohort. Median PSA at 4 years was 0.169 (IQR, 0.096-0.360), with 45% of patients having a PSA greater than 0.2. OS was 96.9%, with 5 deaths reported but only one was secondary to prostate cancer. Late grade > 2 genitourinary toxicities were reported in 18 patients (11.2%). Three patients (1.9%) developed secondary cancers, all considered unrelated to their LDR brachytherapy.
Conclusions: With excellent long-term treatment outcomes and minimal associated toxicities, our results showed that LDR brachytherapy can be an effective treatment of choice in younger men.
{"title":"Low-dose-rate brachytherapy and long-term treatment outcomes in patients younger than 60 years of age","authors":"Alexander Armstrong, Huong Ho, Mark Tacey, Damien Bolton, Yee Chan, Alwin Tan, Chee Wee Cham, Trung Pham, Kevin McMillan, George Koufogiannis, Paul Manohar, Mario Guerrieri, Michael Ng, Daryl Lim Joon, Farshad Foroudi, Mun Yee Tan, Michael Chao","doi":"10.5114/jcb.2024.135630","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2024.135630","url":null,"abstract":"<b>Purpose:</b><br/>Low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy in young men remains controversial amongst urologists due to their concerns regarding long-term biochemical control and treatment-related toxicities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the treatment outcomes of men under 60 years of age who underwent LDR brachytherapy with iodine-125 (<sup>125</sup>I) for clinically localized low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer.<br/><br/><b>Material and methods:</b><br/>All consecutive patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated at our institution from 2003 to 2016 with <sup>125</sup>I monotherapy were included in the study. Prescription dose was 145.0 Gy modified peripheral loading (MPD). All patients were assessed for biochemical progression-free survival using Phoenix definition (nadir +2 ng/ml), clinical progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), and any associated treatment toxicity.<br/><br/><b>Results:</b><br/>A total of 161 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 6.8 years (range, 3-14.54 years). Median age at implant was 57 years (range, 53-59 years). Mean prostate specific antigen (PSA) level at diagnosis was 4.43 ng/ml (SD = 2.29). Majority of men had low-risk prostate cancer (70.2%). Biochemical progression-free survival at 8 years was 94% for the entire cohort. Median PSA at 4 years was 0.169 (IQR, 0.096-0.360), with 45% of patients having a PSA greater than 0.2. OS was 96.9%, with 5 deaths reported but only one was secondary to prostate cancer. Late grade > 2 genitourinary toxicities were reported in 18 patients (11.2%). Three patients (1.9%) developed secondary cancers, all considered unrelated to their LDR brachytherapy.<br/><br/><b>Conclusions:</b><br/>With excellent long-term treatment outcomes and minimal associated toxicities, our results showed that LDR brachytherapy can be an effective treatment of choice in younger men.<br/><br/>","PeriodicalId":51305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140602181","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: The aim of the study was to dosimetrically compare intra-cavitary brachytherapy technique (ICBT) with free-hand (intra-cavitary + interstitial, IC + IS) technique.
Material and methods: Twenty seven locally advanced carcinoma cervix patients were included in the study. Patients with more than medial 1/3rd parametrial residual disease without extending upto lateral pelvic wall were included, following external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), in which cobalt-60 high-dose-rate (60Co HDR) brachytherapy source was used. Dose for both plans were 6.5 Gy × 4 fractions, 2 fractions per day, 6 hours apart, over 2 days. Free-hand brachytherapy technique, consisted of placement of central tandem and 2 ovoids along with needles without using template, was applied. Two plans were generated by activating and deactivating the needles, and compared by normalizing to V100.
Results: A total of 79 needles were applied. Using paired-t test, dosimetric comparison of both the plans was done. Free-hand plan had a significant higher mean V90 (volume receiving 90% of the dose) of 94.2% compared with 87.22% in ICBT plan (p ≤ 0.0001). Free-hand and ICBT plans presented a mean V100 values of 89.06% and 81.51% (p ≤ 0.0001), respectively, favoring free-hand plan. The mean D90 (dose to 90% volume), D98, and D100 of free-hand plan were 6.28 Gray (Gy), 4.91 Gy, and 3.62 Gy, respectively, but equivalent parameters in ICBT plan were 5.26 Gy, 3.72 Gy, and 2.61 Gy, with p value ≤ 0.0001. In both the plans, D2cc of the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid were 4.59 Gy, 3.98 Gy, 2.77 Gy, and 4.46 Gy, 3.90 Gy, 2.67 Gy, respectively, with no statistical significance.
Conclusions: Free-hand brachytherapy (IC + IS) achieves a statistically significant better dose distribution to high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) comparing with ICBT technique with similar dose to organs at risk.
{"title":"Dosimetric comparison of intra-cavitary brachytherapy technique with free-hand (intra-cavitary + interstitial) technique in cervical cancer","authors":"Sumukh Jamadagni, Arul Ponni, Revathy P","doi":"10.5114/jcb.2024.135629","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2024.135629","url":null,"abstract":"<b>Purpose:</b><br/>The aim of the study was to dosimetrically compare intra-cavitary brachytherapy technique (ICBT) with free-hand (intra-cavitary + interstitial, IC + IS) technique.<br/><br/><b>Material and methods:</b><br/>Twenty seven locally advanced carcinoma cervix patients were included in the study. Patients with more than medial 1/3<sup>rd</sup> parametrial residual disease without extending upto lateral pelvic wall were included, following external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), in which cobalt-60 high-dose-rate (<sup>60</sup>Co HDR) brachytherapy source was used. Dose for both plans were 6.5 Gy × 4 fractions, 2 fractions per day, 6 hours apart, over 2 days. Free-hand brachytherapy technique, consisted of placement of central tandem and 2 ovoids along with needles without using template, was applied. Two plans were generated by activating and deactivating the needles, and compared by normalizing to V<sub>100</sub>.<br/><br/><b>Results:</b><br/>A total of 79 needles were applied. Using paired-t test, dosimetric comparison of both the plans was done. Free-hand plan had a significant higher mean V90 (volume receiving 90% of the dose) of 94.2% compared with 87.22% in ICBT plan (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.0001). Free-hand and ICBT plans presented a mean V<sub>100</sub> values of 89.06% and 81.51% (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.0001), respectively, favoring free-hand plan. The mean <sub>D90</sub> (dose to 90% volume), D<sub>98</sub>, and D<sub>100</sub> of free-hand plan were 6.28 Gray (Gy), 4.91 Gy, and 3.62 Gy, respectively, but equivalent parameters in ICBT plan were 5.26 Gy, 3.72 Gy, and 2.61 Gy, with <i>p</i> value ≤ 0.0001. In both the plans, D<sub>2cc</sub> of the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid were 4.59 Gy, 3.98 Gy, 2.77 Gy, and 4.46 Gy, 3.90 Gy, 2.67 Gy, respectively, with no statistical significance.<br/><br/><b>Conclusions:</b><br/>Free-hand brachytherapy (IC + IS) achieves a statistically significant better dose distribution to high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) comparing with ICBT technique with similar dose to organs at risk.<br/><br/>","PeriodicalId":51305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140324589","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sophie Renard, Nicolas Demogeot, Marie Bruand, Nassim Sahki, Vincent Marchesi, William Gehin, Emilie Meknaci, Didier Peiffert
Purpose: Brachytherapy (BT) is a validated radiation technique for treatment of early stage tumors of oral cavity and oropharynx. This study aimed to analyze the results of our institute’s patients after replacing low-dose-rate (LDR) with pulse-dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy.
Material and methods: We retrospectively collected data from all patients treated between 2009 and 2020 for squamous cell carcinoma (floor of the mouth, tongue, and oropharynx) using adjuvant interstitial BT with or without external RT. Primary outcome was local control. Secondary outcomes were regional control rate and toxicity. Statistical analysis of local and regional recurrences were described using Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic value of each factor for recurrence or toxicity was evaluated with bivariate Fine-Gray model.
Results: Data from 66 patients were analyzed. Local and regional recurrences were reported in 11% and 20% of the patients, respectively. No significant factors were identified in the present study. Grade 2 and 3 acute mucositis were reported in 21% of patients, and were more frequent in the BT only group. Almost half (47%) of the patients described acute pain following BT, and 26% required stage 2 or 3 analgesics. Trophic disorders were observed in 16 patients. Five patients presented with soft tissue necrosis (STN) and required medical treatment, of whom one subsequently required hyperbaric oxygen therapy. No predictive factors were identified for STN risk. Two patients developed osteoradionecrosis.
Conclusions: Oral and oropharyngeal PDR-BT as adjuvant treatment is safe and effective for well-defined indications.
{"title":"Adjuvant pulse-dose-rate brachytherapy for oral cavity and oropharynx carcinoma: Outcome and toxicity assessment of 66 patients","authors":"Sophie Renard, Nicolas Demogeot, Marie Bruand, Nassim Sahki, Vincent Marchesi, William Gehin, Emilie Meknaci, Didier Peiffert","doi":"10.5114/jcb.2024.135626","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2024.135626","url":null,"abstract":"<b>Purpose:</b><br/>Brachytherapy (BT) is a validated radiation technique for treatment of early stage tumors of oral cavity and oropharynx. This study aimed to analyze the results of our institute’s patients after replacing low-dose-rate (LDR) with pulse-dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy.<br/><br/><b>Material and methods:</b><br/>We retrospectively collected data from all patients treated between 2009 and 2020 for squamous cell carcinoma (floor of the mouth, tongue, and oropharynx) using adjuvant interstitial BT with or without external RT. Primary outcome was local control. Secondary outcomes were regional control rate and toxicity. Statistical analysis of local and regional recurrences were described using Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic value of each factor for recurrence or toxicity was evaluated with bivariate Fine-Gray model.<br/><br/><b>Results:</b><br/>Data from 66 patients were analyzed. Local and regional recurrences were reported in 11% and 20% of the patients, respectively. No significant factors were identified in the present study. Grade 2 and 3 acute mucositis were reported in 21% of patients, and were more frequent in the BT only group. Almost half (47%) of the patients described acute pain following BT, and 26% required stage 2 or 3 analgesics. Trophic disorders were observed in 16 patients. Five patients presented with soft tissue necrosis (STN) and required medical treatment, of whom one subsequently required hyperbaric oxygen therapy. No predictive factors were identified for STN risk. Two patients developed osteoradionecrosis.<br/><br/><b>Conclusions:</b><br/>Oral and oropharyngeal PDR-BT as adjuvant treatment is safe and effective for well-defined indications.<br/><br/>","PeriodicalId":51305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140325714","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：