首页 > 最新文献

Lancet Respiratory Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
Anti-interleukin-4 receptor therapy for COPD with dupilumab? 用杜匹单抗抗白细胞介素-4受体治疗慢性阻塞性肺病?
IF 76.2 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(24)00266-2
J Christian Virchow
No Abstract
无摘要
{"title":"Anti-interleukin-4 receptor therapy for COPD with dupilumab?","authors":"J Christian Virchow","doi":"10.1016/s2213-2600(24)00266-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(24)00266-2","url":null,"abstract":"No Abstract","PeriodicalId":51307,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Respiratory Medicine","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":76.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142363254","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Inhaled colistimethate sodium in patients with bronchiectasis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection: results of PROMIS-I and PROMIS-II, two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials assessing safety and efficacy over 12 months. 支气管扩张和铜绿假单胞菌感染患者吸入可乐定钠:PROMIS-I 和 PROMIS-II(两项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的 3 期试验,评估 12 个月的安全性和有效性)的结果。
IF 38.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-10 DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00225-X
Charles S Haworth, Michal Shteinberg, Kevin Winthrop, Alan Barker, Francesco Blasi, Katerina Dimakou, Lucy C Morgan, Anne E O'Donnell, Felix C Ringshausen, Oriol Sibila, Rachel M Thomson, Kevin J Carroll, Federica Pontenani, Paola Castellani, James D Chalmers
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic lung infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa is associated with increased exacerbations and mortality in people with bronchiectasis. The PROMIS-I and PROMIS-II trials investigated the efficacy and safety of 12-months of inhaled colistimethate sodium delivered via the I-neb.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of twice per day colistimethate sodium versus placebo were conducted in patients with bronchiectasis with P aeruginosa and a history of at least two exacerbations requiring oral antibiotics or one requiring intravenous antibiotics in the previous year in hospitals in Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Greece, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, the UK, and the USA. Randomisation was conducted through an interactive web response system and stratified by site and long term use of macrolides. Masking was achieved by providing colistimethate sodium and placebo in identical vials. After random assignment, study visits were scheduled for 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months (the end of the treatment period); and telephone calls were scheduled for 7 days after random assignment and 2 weeks after the end of treatment. The primary endpoint was the mean annual exacerbation rate. These trials are registered with EudraCT: number 2015-002743-33 (for PROMIS-I) and 2016-004558-13 (for PROMIS-II), and are now completed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>377 patients were randomly assigned in PROMIS-I (177 to colistimethate sodium and 200 to placebo; in the modified intention-to-treat population, 176 were in the colistimethate sodium group and 197 were in the placebo group) between June 6, 2017, and April 8, 2020. The annual exacerbation rate was 0·58 in the colistimethate sodium group versus 0·95 in the placebo group (rate ratio 0·61; 95% CI 0·46-0·82; p=0·0010). 287 patients were randomly assigned in PROMIS-II (152 were assigned to colistimethate sodium and 135 were assigned to placebo, in the modified intention-to-treat population), between Feb 12, 2018, and Oct 22, 2021. PROMIS-II was then prematurely terminated due to the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic. No significant difference was observed in the annual exacerbation rate between the colistimethate sodium and placebo groups (0·89 vs 0·89; rate ratio 1·00; 95% CI 0·75-1·35; p=0·98). No major safety issues were identified. The overall frequency of adverse events was 142 (81%) patients in the colistimethate sodium group versus 159 (81%) patients in the placebo group in PROMIS-I, and 123 (81%) patients versus 104 (77%) patients in PROMIS-II. There were no deaths related to study treatment.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The data from PROMIS-I suggest a clinically important benefit of colistimethate sodium delivered via the I-neb adaptive aerosol delivery system in patients with bronchiectasis and P aeruginosa infection. These results were not replicated in P
背景:慢性肺部铜绿假单胞菌感染与支气管扩张患者病情加重和死亡率升高有关。PROMIS-I和PROMIS-II试验调查了通过I-neb吸入可乐定钠12个月的疗效和安全性:在阿根廷、澳大利亚、比利时、加拿大、法国、德国、希腊、以色列、意大利、荷兰、新西兰、波兰、葡萄牙、西班牙、瑞士、英国和美国的医院中,对铜绿假单胞菌支气管扩张症患者进行了两项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,试验对象为前一年至少出现过两次需要口服抗生素或一次需要静脉注射抗生素的病情加重病史的患者,试验结果显示,每天两次的可乐定钠与安慰剂相比具有显著疗效。随机化是通过交互式网络响应系统进行的,并根据医院和长期使用大环内酯类药物的情况进行分层。通过提供装在相同药瓶中的可乐定钠和安慰剂来实现掩蔽。随机分配后,分别在 1、3、6、9 和 12 个月(治疗期结束)进行研究访问;随机分配后 7 天和治疗结束后 2 周进行电话访问。主要终点是年平均病情恶化率。这些试验已在 EudraCT 注册:编号为 2015-002743-33 (PROMIS-I)和 2016-004558-13 (PROMIS-II),现已完成:2017年6月6日至2020年4月8日期间,377名患者被随机分配到PROMIS-I中(177名患者被分配到可乐定钠组,200名患者被分配到安慰剂组;在修改后的意向治疗人群中,176名患者被分配到可乐定钠组,197名患者被分配到安慰剂组)。年恶化率为:可乐定钠组 0-58 例,安慰剂组 0-95 例(比率比 0-61;95% CI 0-46-0-82;P=0-0010)。在2018年2月12日至2021年10月22日期间,287名患者被随机分配到PROMIS-II中(在修改后的意向治疗人群中,152人被分配到可乐定钠组,135人被分配到安慰剂组)。随后,由于 COVID-19 大流行的影响,PROMIS-II 提前终止。可乐定钠组和安慰剂组的年度病情恶化率无明显差异(0-89 vs 0-89;比率比 1-00;95% CI 0-75-1-35;P=0-98)。未发现重大安全性问题。在PROMIS-I研究中,不良事件的总发生率为:可乐定钠组142例(81%),安慰剂组159例(81%);PROMIS-II研究中,可乐定钠组123例(81%),安慰剂组104例(77%)。没有与研究治疗相关的死亡病例:PROMIS-I的数据表明,通过I-neb自适应气溶胶给药系统给支气管扩张和铜绿假单胞菌感染患者使用可乐定钠具有重要的临床疗效。这些结果并未在 PROMIS-II 中得到验证,该项目受到 COVID-19 大流行的影响而提前终止:Zambon.
{"title":"Inhaled colistimethate sodium in patients with bronchiectasis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection: results of PROMIS-I and PROMIS-II, two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials assessing safety and efficacy over 12 months.","authors":"Charles S Haworth, Michal Shteinberg, Kevin Winthrop, Alan Barker, Francesco Blasi, Katerina Dimakou, Lucy C Morgan, Anne E O'Donnell, Felix C Ringshausen, Oriol Sibila, Rachel M Thomson, Kevin J Carroll, Federica Pontenani, Paola Castellani, James D Chalmers","doi":"10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00225-X","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00225-X","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Chronic lung infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa is associated with increased exacerbations and mortality in people with bronchiectasis. The PROMIS-I and PROMIS-II trials investigated the efficacy and safety of 12-months of inhaled colistimethate sodium delivered via the I-neb.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;Two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of twice per day colistimethate sodium versus placebo were conducted in patients with bronchiectasis with P aeruginosa and a history of at least two exacerbations requiring oral antibiotics or one requiring intravenous antibiotics in the previous year in hospitals in Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Greece, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, the UK, and the USA. Randomisation was conducted through an interactive web response system and stratified by site and long term use of macrolides. Masking was achieved by providing colistimethate sodium and placebo in identical vials. After random assignment, study visits were scheduled for 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months (the end of the treatment period); and telephone calls were scheduled for 7 days after random assignment and 2 weeks after the end of treatment. The primary endpoint was the mean annual exacerbation rate. These trials are registered with EudraCT: number 2015-002743-33 (for PROMIS-I) and 2016-004558-13 (for PROMIS-II), and are now completed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings: &lt;/strong&gt;377 patients were randomly assigned in PROMIS-I (177 to colistimethate sodium and 200 to placebo; in the modified intention-to-treat population, 176 were in the colistimethate sodium group and 197 were in the placebo group) between June 6, 2017, and April 8, 2020. The annual exacerbation rate was 0·58 in the colistimethate sodium group versus 0·95 in the placebo group (rate ratio 0·61; 95% CI 0·46-0·82; p=0·0010). 287 patients were randomly assigned in PROMIS-II (152 were assigned to colistimethate sodium and 135 were assigned to placebo, in the modified intention-to-treat population), between Feb 12, 2018, and Oct 22, 2021. PROMIS-II was then prematurely terminated due to the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic. No significant difference was observed in the annual exacerbation rate between the colistimethate sodium and placebo groups (0·89 vs 0·89; rate ratio 1·00; 95% CI 0·75-1·35; p=0·98). No major safety issues were identified. The overall frequency of adverse events was 142 (81%) patients in the colistimethate sodium group versus 159 (81%) patients in the placebo group in PROMIS-I, and 123 (81%) patients versus 104 (77%) patients in PROMIS-II. There were no deaths related to study treatment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Interpretation: &lt;/strong&gt;The data from PROMIS-I suggest a clinically important benefit of colistimethate sodium delivered via the I-neb adaptive aerosol delivery system in patients with bronchiectasis and P aeruginosa infection. These results were not replicated in P","PeriodicalId":51307,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Respiratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"787-798"},"PeriodicalIF":38.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300399","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Confounding undermines inferences of preventive therapy effectiveness among subgroups of tuberculosis contacts 混杂因素影响了对结核病接触者亚群的预防性治疗效果的推断
IF 76.2 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(24)00292-3
James Greenan-Barrett, Yohhei Hamada, Katherine L Fielding, Mahdad Noursadeghi, Rishi K Gupta
No Abstract
无摘要
{"title":"Confounding undermines inferences of preventive therapy effectiveness among subgroups of tuberculosis contacts","authors":"James Greenan-Barrett, Yohhei Hamada, Katherine L Fielding, Mahdad Noursadeghi, Rishi K Gupta","doi":"10.1016/s2213-2600(24)00292-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(24)00292-3","url":null,"abstract":"No Abstract","PeriodicalId":51307,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Respiratory Medicine","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":76.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142363253","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Long-term efficacy and safety of two short standardised regimens for the treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (STREAM stage 2): extended follow-up of an open-label, multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial 治疗耐利福平结核病的两种短期标准化方案的长期疗效和安全性(STREAM 第 2 阶段):一项开放标签、多中心、随机、非劣效试验的延长随访期
IF 76.2 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(24)00186-3
Ruth L Goodall, Andrew J Nunn, Sarah K Meredith, Adamu Bayissa, Anuj K Bhatnagar, Chen-Yuan Chiang, Francesca Conradie, Narendran Gopalan, Meera Gurumurthy, Bruce Kirenga, Nana Kiria, Daniel Meressa, Ronelle Moodliar, Nosipho Ngubane, Mohammed Rassool, Karen Sanders, Rajesh Solanki, S Bertel Squire, Mekonnen Teferi, Gabriela Torrea, Eve Worrall
<h3>Background</h3>STREAM stage 2 showed that two bedaquiline-containing regimens (a 9-month all-oral regimen and a 6-month regimen with 8 weeks of aminoglycoside) had superior efficacy to a 9-month injectable-containing regimen for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis up to 76 weeks after randomisation. Our objective in this follow-up analysis was to assess the durability of efficacy and safety, including mortality, at 132 weeks.<h3>Methods</h3>We report the long-term outcomes from STREAM stage 2, a randomised, phase 3 non-inferiority (10% margin) trial in participants (aged ≥15 years) with rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis without fluoroquinolone or aminoglycoside resistance at 13 clinical sites in seven countries (Ethiopia, Georgia, India, Moldova, Mongolia, South Africa, and Uganda). Participants were randomly assigned 1:2:2:2 (via permuted blocks and stratified by site and HIV status plus CD4 cell count) to the 2011 WHO long regimen (terminated early), a 9-month control regimen, a 9-month oral regimen with bedaquiline (primary comparison), or a 6-month regimen with bedaquiline and 8 weeks of an injectable antituberculous drug. Participants and clinicians were aware of treatment-group assignments, but laboratory staff were masked. The primary outcome, reported previously, was favourable status (negative cultures for <em>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</em> without a preceding unfavourable outcome; any death, bacteriological failure or recurrence, and major treatment change were considered unfavourable) at week 76. Here we report efficacy outcomes at week 132, analysed in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population. Safety assessments continued to 132 weeks and were in all participants who received at least one dose of the study regimen. All comparisons used concurrently randomised participants. This trial is registered on ISRCTN (ISRCTN18148631) and is now completed.<h3>Findings</h3>Between March 28, 2016, and Jan 28, 2020, 588 participants were randomly assigned to the long (n=32), control (n=202), oral (n=211), or 6-month (n=143) treatment regimens; 352 (60%) were male and 236 (40%) were female. Of the 556 participants on the three shorter regimens, 517 were included in the mITT population (187 in control group, 196 in oral group, and 134 in 6-month group) and 465 in the per-protocol analyses. Six additional participants had an unfavourable outcome that occurred between week 76 and the end of efficacy follow-up (one in control group, four in oral group, one in 6-month group). In the mITT population, the proportion of patients with an unfavourable outcome at the end of follow-up was 19·6% (95% CI 14·3 to 24·9) in the oral group and 29·3% (23·3 to 36·5) in the control group (–9·7 percentage points difference [95% CI –18·7 to –1·8]; p<sub>superiority</sub>=0·024). An estimated 9·8% (95% CI 4·6 to 14·9) of participants on the 6-month regimen had an unfavourable outcome, which was significantly lower than for those concurrently on the control regi
背景STREAM第2阶段显示,在随机分组后76周内,两种含贝达喹啉的治疗方案(9个月的全口服治疗方案和6个月的含8周氨基糖苷的治疗方案)治疗耐利福平结核病的疗效优于9个月的含注射剂的治疗方案。我们报告了 STREAM 第 2 阶段的长期疗效,这是一项随机、3 期非劣效性(10% 差值)试验,在 7 个国家(埃塞俄比亚、格鲁吉亚、印度、摩尔多瓦、蒙古、南非和乌干达)的 13 个临床研究机构进行,受试者(年龄≥15 岁)患有耐利福平结核病,但对氟喹诺酮类药物或氨基糖苷类药物无耐药性。参与者按1:2:2:2的比例被随机分配到2011年世卫组织长疗程方案(提前终止)、9个月对照方案、9个月贝达喹啉口服方案(主要对比方案)或6个月贝达喹啉和8周注射抗结核药物方案(主要对比方案)。参与者和临床医生都知道治疗组的分配,但实验室工作人员被蒙蔽。先前报告的主要疗效是第 76 周时的良好疗效(结核分枝杆菌培养阴性,且之前未出现不良疗效;任何死亡、细菌学失败或复发以及重大治疗改变均被视为不良疗效)。我们在此报告的是第132周的疗效结果,分析对象为改良意向治疗(mITT)人群。安全性评估一直持续到第132周,评估对象是所有接受了至少一个剂量研究方案的参与者。所有比较均采用同时随机化的参与者。研究结果在2016年3月28日至2020年1月28日期间,588名参与者被随机分配到长效治疗方案(32人)、对照组(202人)、口服治疗方案(211人)或6个月治疗方案(143人);其中352人(60%)为男性,236人(40%)为女性。在接受三种较短疗程治疗的 556 名参与者中,517 人被纳入 mITT 群体(对照组 187 人、口服组 196 人、6 个月组 134 人),465 人被纳入按方案分析。另有6名参与者在第76周至疗效随访结束期间出现了不利结果(对照组1人、口服组4人、6个月组1人)。在mITT人群中,随访结束时出现不利结果的患者比例为:口服组19-6%(95% CI 14-3至24-9),对照组29-3%(23-3至36-5)(差异为-9-7个百分点[95% CI -18-7至-1-8];Ps优于=0-024)。估计有9-8%(95% CI 4-6至14-9)的6个月疗程参与者出现不利结果,明显低于同时接受对照疗程(32-5% [23-7至40-2];ps优效性<0-0001)或口服疗程(23-8% [16-9至31-1];ps优效性=0-013)的参与者。第 76 周后报告的严重或严重不良事件很少,没有迹象表明两种方案之间存在差异。在第132周时,口服方案(7/205;3%)中出现治疗引起的听力损失的人数明显少于对照方案(16/198;8%;P=0.041);口服方案(6/139;4%)和6个月方案(5/143;4%;P=0-72)中出现严重听力损失的人数没有明显差异。死亡率较低:接受贝达喹啉治疗的参与者(即口服方案和6个月方案,n=287)每100人年的死亡率为1-01(95% CI为0-48至2-12),而接受对照方案的参与者(n=140;p=0-49)每100人年的死亡率为1-52(0-63至3-66)。解释两种含有贝达喹啉的治疗方案均保持了优于对照方案的效果,没有证据表明死亡率增加,为患者提供了两种额外的循证治疗选择;之前对贝达喹啉死亡率的担忧没有得到证实。
{"title":"Long-term efficacy and safety of two short standardised regimens for the treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (STREAM stage 2): extended follow-up of an open-label, multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial","authors":"Ruth L Goodall, Andrew J Nunn, Sarah K Meredith, Adamu Bayissa, Anuj K Bhatnagar, Chen-Yuan Chiang, Francesca Conradie, Narendran Gopalan, Meera Gurumurthy, Bruce Kirenga, Nana Kiria, Daniel Meressa, Ronelle Moodliar, Nosipho Ngubane, Mohammed Rassool, Karen Sanders, Rajesh Solanki, S Bertel Squire, Mekonnen Teferi, Gabriela Torrea, Eve Worrall","doi":"10.1016/s2213-2600(24)00186-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(24)00186-3","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;h3&gt;Background&lt;/h3&gt;STREAM stage 2 showed that two bedaquiline-containing regimens (a 9-month all-oral regimen and a 6-month regimen with 8 weeks of aminoglycoside) had superior efficacy to a 9-month injectable-containing regimen for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis up to 76 weeks after randomisation. Our objective in this follow-up analysis was to assess the durability of efficacy and safety, including mortality, at 132 weeks.&lt;h3&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;We report the long-term outcomes from STREAM stage 2, a randomised, phase 3 non-inferiority (10% margin) trial in participants (aged ≥15 years) with rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis without fluoroquinolone or aminoglycoside resistance at 13 clinical sites in seven countries (Ethiopia, Georgia, India, Moldova, Mongolia, South Africa, and Uganda). Participants were randomly assigned 1:2:2:2 (via permuted blocks and stratified by site and HIV status plus CD4 cell count) to the 2011 WHO long regimen (terminated early), a 9-month control regimen, a 9-month oral regimen with bedaquiline (primary comparison), or a 6-month regimen with bedaquiline and 8 weeks of an injectable antituberculous drug. Participants and clinicians were aware of treatment-group assignments, but laboratory staff were masked. The primary outcome, reported previously, was favourable status (negative cultures for &lt;em&gt;Mycobacterium tuberculosis&lt;/em&gt; without a preceding unfavourable outcome; any death, bacteriological failure or recurrence, and major treatment change were considered unfavourable) at week 76. Here we report efficacy outcomes at week 132, analysed in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population. Safety assessments continued to 132 weeks and were in all participants who received at least one dose of the study regimen. All comparisons used concurrently randomised participants. This trial is registered on ISRCTN (ISRCTN18148631) and is now completed.&lt;h3&gt;Findings&lt;/h3&gt;Between March 28, 2016, and Jan 28, 2020, 588 participants were randomly assigned to the long (n=32), control (n=202), oral (n=211), or 6-month (n=143) treatment regimens; 352 (60%) were male and 236 (40%) were female. Of the 556 participants on the three shorter regimens, 517 were included in the mITT population (187 in control group, 196 in oral group, and 134 in 6-month group) and 465 in the per-protocol analyses. Six additional participants had an unfavourable outcome that occurred between week 76 and the end of efficacy follow-up (one in control group, four in oral group, one in 6-month group). In the mITT population, the proportion of patients with an unfavourable outcome at the end of follow-up was 19·6% (95% CI 14·3 to 24·9) in the oral group and 29·3% (23·3 to 36·5) in the control group (–9·7 percentage points difference [95% CI –18·7 to –1·8]; p&lt;sub&gt;superiority&lt;/sub&gt;=0·024). An estimated 9·8% (95% CI 4·6 to 14·9) of participants on the 6-month regimen had an unfavourable outcome, which was significantly lower than for those concurrently on the control regi","PeriodicalId":51307,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Respiratory Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":76.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142363250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Continuing ECMO with no possible transition to recovery or transplant. 持续进行 ECMO,不可能过渡到康复或移植。
IF 38.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-05 DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00260-1
Alexander Supady, William L Allen, Thaddeus M Pope
{"title":"Continuing ECMO with no possible transition to recovery or transplant.","authors":"Alexander Supady, William L Allen, Thaddeus M Pope","doi":"10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00260-1","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00260-1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51307,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Respiratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"754-756"},"PeriodicalIF":38.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142146832","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Respiratory syncytial virus infections in adults: a narrative review. 成人呼吸道合胞病毒感染:综述。
IF 38.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-09 DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00255-8
Joanne G Wildenbeest, David M Lowe, Joseph F Standing, Christopher C Butler

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), an RNA virus spread by droplet infection that affects all ages, is increasingly recognised as an important pathogen in adults, especially among older people living with comorbidities. Distinguishing RSV from other acute viral infections on clinical grounds alone, with sufficient precision to be clinically useful, is not possible. The reference standard diagnosis is by PCR: point-of-care tests perform less well with lower viral loads. Testing samples from a single respiratory tract site could result in underdetection. RSV is identified in 6-11% of outpatient respiratory tract infection (RTI) consultations in older adults (≥60 years, or ≥65 years, depending on the study) and accounts for 4-11% of adults (≥18 years) hospitalised with RTI, with 6-15% of those hospitalised admitted to intensive care, and 1-12% of all adults hospitalised with RSV respiratory tract infection dying. Community-based studies estimate the yearly incidence of RSV infection at around 3-7% in adults aged 60 years and older in high-income countries. Although RSV accounts for a similar disease burden as influenza in adults, those hospitalised with severe RSV disease are typically older (most ≥60 years) and have more comorbidities, more respiratory symptoms, and are frequently without fever. Long-term sequelae are common and include deterioration of underlying disease (typically heart failure and COPD). There are few evidence-based RSV-specific treatments currently available, with supportive care being the main modality. Two protein subunit vaccines for protection from severe RSV in adults aged 60 years and older were licensed in 2023, and a third-an mRNA-based vaccine-recently gained market approval in the USA. The phase 3 studies in these three vaccines showed good protection against severe disease. Data on real-world vaccine effectiveness in older adults, including subgroups at high risk for RSV-associated hospitalisation, are needed to establish the best use of these newly approved RSV vaccines. New diagnostics and therapeutics are being developed, which will also need rigorous evaluation within their target populations to ensure they are used only for those in whom there is evidence of improved outcomes. There is an urgent need to reconceptualise this illness from one that is serious in children, but far less important than influenza in older people, to thinking of RSV as also a major risk to health for older people that needs targeted prevention and treatment.

呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)是一种通过飞沫传染的 RNA 病毒,影响所有年龄段的人,越来越多的人认识到它是成年人,尤其是患有合并症的老年人的重要病原体。仅根据临床表现将 RSV 与其他急性病毒感染区分开来,并精确到对临床有用的程度是不可能的。诊断的参考标准是 PCR:在病毒载量较低的情况下,床旁检测的效果较差。对单一呼吸道部位的样本进行检测可能会导致检测不足。在老年人(≥60 岁或≥65 岁,视研究而定)呼吸道感染(RTI)门诊就诊中,6%-11% 的患者被查出感染了 RSV;在因呼吸道感染住院的成年人(≥18 岁)中,4%-11% 的患者感染了 RSV,其中 6%-15%的住院患者需要接受重症监护,1%-12% 的因 RSV 呼吸道感染住院的成年人死亡。基于社区的研究估计,在高收入国家,60 岁及以上的成年人每年的 RSV 感染率约为 3-7%。虽然 RSV 在成人中造成的疾病负担与流感相似,但因严重 RSV 疾病住院的患者通常年龄较大(多数≥60 岁),合并症较多、呼吸道症状较重,而且经常不发烧。长期后遗症很常见,包括基础疾病(通常是心力衰竭和慢性阻塞性肺病)恶化。目前,针对 RSV 的循证治疗方法很少,主要是支持性护理。2023 年,两种保护 60 岁及以上成人免受严重 RSV 感染的蛋白亚单位疫苗获得许可,第三种基于 mRNA 的疫苗最近在美国获得了市场批准。对这三种疫苗进行的 3 期研究显示,它们对严重疾病具有良好的保护作用。要确定这些新批准的 RSV 疫苗的最佳使用方法,还需要有关老年人(包括 RSV 相关住院治疗的高风险亚群)实际接种效果的数据。目前正在开发新的诊断和治疗方法,这些方法也需要在其目标人群中进行严格评估,以确保它们只用于那些有证据表明可以改善疗效的人群。我们迫切需要重新认识这种疾病,将其从一种在儿童中很严重,但在老年人中远没有流感那么重要的疾病,转变为将 RSV 也视为老年人健康的一个主要风险,需要有针对性的预防和治疗。
{"title":"Respiratory syncytial virus infections in adults: a narrative review.","authors":"Joanne G Wildenbeest, David M Lowe, Joseph F Standing, Christopher C Butler","doi":"10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00255-8","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00255-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), an RNA virus spread by droplet infection that affects all ages, is increasingly recognised as an important pathogen in adults, especially among older people living with comorbidities. Distinguishing RSV from other acute viral infections on clinical grounds alone, with sufficient precision to be clinically useful, is not possible. The reference standard diagnosis is by PCR: point-of-care tests perform less well with lower viral loads. Testing samples from a single respiratory tract site could result in underdetection. RSV is identified in 6-11% of outpatient respiratory tract infection (RTI) consultations in older adults (≥60 years, or ≥65 years, depending on the study) and accounts for 4-11% of adults (≥18 years) hospitalised with RTI, with 6-15% of those hospitalised admitted to intensive care, and 1-12% of all adults hospitalised with RSV respiratory tract infection dying. Community-based studies estimate the yearly incidence of RSV infection at around 3-7% in adults aged 60 years and older in high-income countries. Although RSV accounts for a similar disease burden as influenza in adults, those hospitalised with severe RSV disease are typically older (most ≥60 years) and have more comorbidities, more respiratory symptoms, and are frequently without fever. Long-term sequelae are common and include deterioration of underlying disease (typically heart failure and COPD). There are few evidence-based RSV-specific treatments currently available, with supportive care being the main modality. Two protein subunit vaccines for protection from severe RSV in adults aged 60 years and older were licensed in 2023, and a third-an mRNA-based vaccine-recently gained market approval in the USA. The phase 3 studies in these three vaccines showed good protection against severe disease. Data on real-world vaccine effectiveness in older adults, including subgroups at high risk for RSV-associated hospitalisation, are needed to establish the best use of these newly approved RSV vaccines. New diagnostics and therapeutics are being developed, which will also need rigorous evaluation within their target populations to ensure they are used only for those in whom there is evidence of improved outcomes. There is an urgent need to reconceptualise this illness from one that is serious in children, but far less important than influenza in older people, to thinking of RSV as also a major risk to health for older people that needs targeted prevention and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":51307,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Respiratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"822-836"},"PeriodicalIF":38.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Stereotactic body radiotherapy plus neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in operable non-small-cell lung cancer. 可手术的非小细胞肺癌的立体定向体放疗加新辅助化疗免疫疗法。
IF 38.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00289-3
Rafał Dziadziuszko, Bartłomiej Tomasik
{"title":"Stereotactic body radiotherapy plus neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in operable non-small-cell lung cancer.","authors":"Rafał Dziadziuszko, Bartłomiej Tomasik","doi":"10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00289-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00289-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51307,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Respiratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":38.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Stereotactic body radiotherapy with sequential tislelizumab and chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer in China (SACTION01): a single-arm, single-centre, phase 2 trial. 中国可切除非小细胞肺癌患者的立体定向体放疗联合替赛珠单抗和化疗新辅助治疗(SACTION01):单臂、单中心、2 期试验。
IF 38.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00215-7
Ze-Rui Zhao, Shi-Liang Liu, Ting Zhou, Gang Chen, Hao Long, Xiao-Dong Su, Xu Zhang, Jian-Hua Fu, Peng Lin, Lan-Jun Zhang, Tie-Hua Rong, Jia-Di Wu, Zhi-Chao Li, Hui-Lin Su, Ji-Yang Chen, Yun-Peng Yang, Yong-Bin Lin, Mian Xi, Hong Yang

Background: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy with chemotherapy improves outcomes in patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Given its immunomodulating effect, we investigated whether stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) enhances the effect of immunochemotherapy.

Methods: The SACTION01 study was a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 trial that recruited patients who were 18 years or older and had resectable stage IIA-IIIB NSCLC from the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. Eligible patients received SBRT (24 Gy in three fractions) to the primary tumour followed by two cycles of 200 mg intravenous PD-1 inhibitor, tislelizumab, plus platinum-based chemotherapy. Surgical resection was performed 4-6 weeks after neoadjuvant treatment. The primary endpoint was major pathological response (MPR), defined as no more than 10% residual viable tumour in the resected tumour. All analyses were conducted on an intention-to-treat basis, including all patients who were scheduled for neoadjuvant treatment. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05319574) and is ongoing but closed to recruitment.

Findings: Between May 18, 2022, and June 20, 2023, 46 patients (42 men and four women) were enrolled and scheduled for neoadjuvant treatment. MPR was observed in 35 (76%, 95% CI 61-87) of 46 patients. The second cycle of immunochemotherapy was withheld in four (9%) patients due to pneumonia (n=2), colitis (n=1), and increased creatinine (n=1). Grade 3 or worse adverse events related to neoadjuvant treatment occurred in 12 (26%, 95% CI 14-41) patients. The most frequent treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) was alopecia (16 [35%] patients), and the most frequent grade 3 or worse TRAE was neutropenia (six [13%]). There was one treatment-related death, caused by neutropenia. No deaths within 90 days of surgery were reported.

Interpretation: Preoperative SBRT followed by immunochemotherapy is well tolerated, feasible, and leads to a clinically significant MPR rate. Future randomised trials are warranted to support these findings.

Funding: BeiGene.

背景:新辅助免疫治疗与化疗可改善可切除非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的预后。鉴于其免疫调节作用,我们研究了立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)是否能增强免疫化疗的效果:SACTION01研究是一项单臂、开放标签的2期试验,招募了中国广州中山大学肿瘤防治中心18岁或18岁以上可切除的IIA-IIIB期NSCLC患者。符合条件的患者先接受SBRT(24 Gy,分三次)治疗原发肿瘤,然后接受两个周期的200 mg静脉注射PD-1抑制剂tislelizumab和铂类化疗。手术切除在新辅助治疗后4-6周进行。主要终点是主要病理反应(MPR),即切除肿瘤中残留的有活力肿瘤不超过10%。所有分析均在意向治疗基础上进行,包括所有计划接受新辅助治疗的患者。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT05319574)上注册,目前正在进行中,但已结束招募:2022年5月18日至2023年6月20日期间,46名患者(42名男性和4名女性)登记并计划接受新辅助治疗。46 名患者中有 35 人(76%,95% CI 61-87)观察到 MPR。由于肺炎(2例)、结肠炎(1例)和肌酐升高(1例),有4例(9%)患者暂停了第二周期免疫化疗。12例(26%,95% CI 14-41)患者发生了与新辅助治疗相关的3级或更严重不良事件。最常见的治疗相关不良事件(TRAE)是脱发(16 [35%]名患者),最常见的3级或更严重的TRAE是中性粒细胞减少(6 [13%]名患者)。有一例与治疗相关的死亡病例是由中性粒细胞减少症引起的。术后90天内无死亡报告:术前SBRT术后免疫化疗的耐受性良好、可行,并能带来显著的MPR率。未来有必要进行随机试验来支持这些研究结果:资金来源:BeiGene.
{"title":"Stereotactic body radiotherapy with sequential tislelizumab and chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer in China (SACTION01): a single-arm, single-centre, phase 2 trial.","authors":"Ze-Rui Zhao, Shi-Liang Liu, Ting Zhou, Gang Chen, Hao Long, Xiao-Dong Su, Xu Zhang, Jian-Hua Fu, Peng Lin, Lan-Jun Zhang, Tie-Hua Rong, Jia-Di Wu, Zhi-Chao Li, Hui-Lin Su, Ji-Yang Chen, Yun-Peng Yang, Yong-Bin Lin, Mian Xi, Hong Yang","doi":"10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00215-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00215-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neoadjuvant immunotherapy with chemotherapy improves outcomes in patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Given its immunomodulating effect, we investigated whether stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) enhances the effect of immunochemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The SACTION01 study was a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 trial that recruited patients who were 18 years or older and had resectable stage IIA-IIIB NSCLC from the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. Eligible patients received SBRT (24 Gy in three fractions) to the primary tumour followed by two cycles of 200 mg intravenous PD-1 inhibitor, tislelizumab, plus platinum-based chemotherapy. Surgical resection was performed 4-6 weeks after neoadjuvant treatment. The primary endpoint was major pathological response (MPR), defined as no more than 10% residual viable tumour in the resected tumour. All analyses were conducted on an intention-to-treat basis, including all patients who were scheduled for neoadjuvant treatment. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05319574) and is ongoing but closed to recruitment.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between May 18, 2022, and June 20, 2023, 46 patients (42 men and four women) were enrolled and scheduled for neoadjuvant treatment. MPR was observed in 35 (76%, 95% CI 61-87) of 46 patients. The second cycle of immunochemotherapy was withheld in four (9%) patients due to pneumonia (n=2), colitis (n=1), and increased creatinine (n=1). Grade 3 or worse adverse events related to neoadjuvant treatment occurred in 12 (26%, 95% CI 14-41) patients. The most frequent treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) was alopecia (16 [35%] patients), and the most frequent grade 3 or worse TRAE was neutropenia (six [13%]). There was one treatment-related death, caused by neutropenia. No deaths within 90 days of surgery were reported.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Preoperative SBRT followed by immunochemotherapy is well tolerated, feasible, and leads to a clinically significant MPR rate. Future randomised trials are warranted to support these findings.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>BeiGene.</p>","PeriodicalId":51307,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Respiratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":38.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300410","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Savolitinib in NSCLC: progress in the MET exon 14 journey. 萨沃利替尼在 NSCLC 中的应用:MET 14 号外显子研究的进展。
IF 38.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00258-3
Tetsuya Mitsudomi
{"title":"Savolitinib in NSCLC: progress in the MET exon 14 journey.","authors":"Tetsuya Mitsudomi","doi":"10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00258-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00258-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51307,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Respiratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":38.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300406","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Savolitinib in patients in China with locally advanced or metastatic treatment-naive non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring MET exon 14 skipping mutations: results from a single-arm, multicohort, multicentre, open-label, phase 3b confirmatory study. 萨沃利替尼治疗中国携带MET 14外显子跳跃突变的局部晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌患者:一项单臂、多队列、多中心、开放标签的3b期确证研究结果。
IF 38.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00211-X
Yongfeng Yu, Qisen Guo, Yongchang Zhang, Jian Fang, Diansheng Zhong, Baogang Liu, Pinhua Pan, Dongqing Lv, Lin Wu, Yanqiu Zhao, Juan Li, Zhihua Liu, Chunling Liu, Haichuan Su, Yun Fan, Tongmei Zhang, Anwen Liu, Bo Jin, Ye Wang, Jianying Zhou, Zhihong Zhang, Fengming Ran, Xia Song, Michael Shi, Weiguo Su, Shun Lu

Background: Savolitinib has been approved in China for advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping alterations in previously treated patients and those unable to receive platinum-based chemotherapy. We report results from a treatment-naive cohort of a phase 3b study that was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of savolitinib in locally advanced or metastatic METex14-mutated NSCLC.

Methods: This single-arm, multicohort, multicentre, open-label, phase 3b study was done at 48 hospitals in China in adult (≥18 years) patients with locally advanced or metastatic METex14-mutated NSCLC who had not received previous systemic antitumour therapy. Patients with a bodyweight of 50 kg or more and those with a bodyweight of less than 50 kg received savolitinib once daily at 600 mg or 400 mg, respectively, in 21-day cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate assessed by independent review committee (IRC) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours, version 1.1. The full analysis set comprised all patients who received at least one dose of study medication, which was used to assess the efficacy endpoints and baseline and safety data. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04923945) and is closed to accrual.

Findings: Between Aug 31, 2021, and Oct 20, 2023, 125 treatment-naive patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 87 were enrolled and received savolitinib. The median age of patients was 70·0 years (IQR 65·2-75·8) and 51 (59%) of 87 patients were male and 36 (41%) were female. In the full analysis set, the IRC-assessed objective response rate was 62% (95% CI 51-72) and the investigator-assessed objective response rate was 60% (49-70), showing a high concordance rate (84%). Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 85 (98%) of 87 patients, with peripheral oedema (54 [62%]) being the most common. Two of these treatment-related adverse events led to death (cardiac failure n=1, unknown reasons n=1).

Interpretation: Savolitinib showed manageable toxicity and promising efficacy in treatment-naive patients with advanced or metastatic METex14-mutated NSCLC.

Funding: HUTCHMED and AstraZeneca.

背景中国已批准萨沃利替尼用于既往接受过治疗和无法接受铂类化疗的MET外显子14(METex14)跳越改变的晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)。我们报告了一项3b期研究中未接受治疗队列的结果,该研究旨在评估萨沃利替尼对局部晚期或转移性METex14突变NSCLC的疗效和安全性:这项单臂、多队列、多中心、开放标签的3b期研究在中国48家医院进行,对象为既往未接受过全身抗肿瘤治疗的局部晚期或转移性METex14突变NSCLC成年患者(≥18岁)。体重大于或等于 50 千克的患者和体重小于 50 千克的患者接受 savolitinib 治疗,每天一次,每次 600 毫克或 400 毫克,21 天为一个周期。主要终点是由独立审查委员会(IRC)根据《实体瘤反应评估标准》1.1版评估的客观反应率。完整分析集包括所有至少接受过一次研究药物治疗的患者,用于评估疗效终点以及基线和安全性数据。该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT04923945)上注册,并已结束:2021年8月31日至2023年10月20日期间,125名未接受过治疗的患者接受了资格评估,其中87名患者入组并接受了萨沃利替尼治疗。患者的中位年龄为70-0岁(IQR 65-2-75-8),87名患者中有51名男性(59%)和36名女性(41%)。在全部分析集中,IRC评估的客观反应率为62%(95% CI 51-72),研究者评估的客观反应率为60%(49-70),显示出较高的一致性(84%)。87 例患者中有 85 例(98%)报告了与治疗相关的不良事件,其中最常见的是外周水肿(54 例 [62%])。其中2例治疗相关不良事件导致死亡(心力衰竭n=1,原因不明n=1):Savolitinib对晚期或转移性METex14突变NSCLC患者显示出可控的毒性和良好的疗效:HUTCHMED 和阿斯利康。
{"title":"Savolitinib in patients in China with locally advanced or metastatic treatment-naive non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring MET exon 14 skipping mutations: results from a single-arm, multicohort, multicentre, open-label, phase 3b confirmatory study.","authors":"Yongfeng Yu, Qisen Guo, Yongchang Zhang, Jian Fang, Diansheng Zhong, Baogang Liu, Pinhua Pan, Dongqing Lv, Lin Wu, Yanqiu Zhao, Juan Li, Zhihua Liu, Chunling Liu, Haichuan Su, Yun Fan, Tongmei Zhang, Anwen Liu, Bo Jin, Ye Wang, Jianying Zhou, Zhihong Zhang, Fengming Ran, Xia Song, Michael Shi, Weiguo Su, Shun Lu","doi":"10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00211-X","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00211-X","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Savolitinib has been approved in China for advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping alterations in previously treated patients and those unable to receive platinum-based chemotherapy. We report results from a treatment-naive cohort of a phase 3b study that was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of savolitinib in locally advanced or metastatic METex14-mutated NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-arm, multicohort, multicentre, open-label, phase 3b study was done at 48 hospitals in China in adult (≥18 years) patients with locally advanced or metastatic METex14-mutated NSCLC who had not received previous systemic antitumour therapy. Patients with a bodyweight of 50 kg or more and those with a bodyweight of less than 50 kg received savolitinib once daily at 600 mg or 400 mg, respectively, in 21-day cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate assessed by independent review committee (IRC) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours, version 1.1. The full analysis set comprised all patients who received at least one dose of study medication, which was used to assess the efficacy endpoints and baseline and safety data. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04923945) and is closed to accrual.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between Aug 31, 2021, and Oct 20, 2023, 125 treatment-naive patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 87 were enrolled and received savolitinib. The median age of patients was 70·0 years (IQR 65·2-75·8) and 51 (59%) of 87 patients were male and 36 (41%) were female. In the full analysis set, the IRC-assessed objective response rate was 62% (95% CI 51-72) and the investigator-assessed objective response rate was 60% (49-70), showing a high concordance rate (84%). Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 85 (98%) of 87 patients, with peripheral oedema (54 [62%]) being the most common. Two of these treatment-related adverse events led to death (cardiac failure n=1, unknown reasons n=1).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Savolitinib showed manageable toxicity and promising efficacy in treatment-naive patients with advanced or metastatic METex14-mutated NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>HUTCHMED and AstraZeneca.</p>","PeriodicalId":51307,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Respiratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":38.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300407","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Lancet Respiratory Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1