Lancet Respiratory Medicine最新文献

Background: The combination of platinum-based chemotherapy and an antibody to PD-1 or to its ligand PD-L1, with or without an antibody to CTLA-4, has improved the survival of individuals with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, no randomised controlled trial has evaluated the survival benefit of adding a CTLA-4 inhibitor to platinum-based chemotherapy plus a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor.

Methods: This open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial was conducted at 48 hospitals in Japan. Eligible patients were aged 20 years or older with previously untreated advanced NSCLC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients with known driver oncogenes were excluded. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive platinum-based chemotherapy (four cycles) plus pembrolizumab (pembrolizumab group) or platinum-based chemotherapy (two cycles) plus nivolumab-ipilimumab (nivolumab-ipilimumab group). The primary endpoint was overall survival and assessed in all randomly assigned patients on an intention-to-treat basis. The trial is registered in the Japan Registry for Clinical Trials, jRCTs031210013, and is now closed to new enrolment and is ongoing.

Findings: Between patient accrual initiation on April 6, 2021, and discontinuation of the trial on March 30, 2023, 11 (7%) of 148 patients in the nivolumab-ipilimumab group had a treatment-related death. Because of the high number of treatment-related deaths, patient accrual was terminated early, resulting in 295 patients (236 [80%] male and 59 [20%] female) enrolled; the primary analysis was done on the basis of 117 deaths (fewer than the required 329 deaths). By May 25, 2023 (data cutoff), overall survival did not differ significantly between the nivolumab-ipilimumab group and the pembrolizumab group (median 23·7 months [95% CI 17·6-not estimable] vs 20·5 months [17·6-not estimable], respectively; hazard ratio 0·98 [90% CI 0·72-1·34]; p=0·46). Non-haematological adverse events of grade 3 or worse occurred in 87 (60%) of 146 patients in the nivolumab-ipilimumab group and 59 (41%) of 144 patients in the pembrolizumab group. The pembrolizumab group tended to have a better quality of life compared with the nivolumab-ipilimumab group.

Interpretation: The safety and efficacy data suggest an unfavourable benefit-risk profile for nivolumab-ipilimumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy relative to pembrolizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC, although a definitive conclusion awaits an updated analysis of overall survival.

Funding: The National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund and Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development.

Background: Elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor has been approved in Europe for people with cystic fibrosis with at least one F508del CFTR variant. Additionally, it is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for people with cystic fibrosis with at least one of 177 rare variants. The aims of this study were to describe the clinical response to elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor for people with cystic fibrosis without a F508del CFTR variant in France and to determine CFTR variant responsiveness to elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor based on the observed clinical response.

Methods: The French compassionate programme expanded access to elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor to people with cystic fibrosis, aged 6 years and older, without a F508del variant, excluding those with two variants previously characterised as non-responsive. Participants at France's 47 cystic fibrosis centres were given a 4-6 week trial of elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor and response was determined by a centralised committee based on evolution of clinical data, lung function, and sweat chloride concentration. Responsiveness of individual CFTR variants was derived from observed clinical responses.

Findings: The first compassionnate programme was launched on May 19, 2022; by March 8, 2024, 516 people with cystic fibrosis had been identified for inclusion in this real-word study: 37 were not included due to the presence of two variants previously characterised as non-responsive to elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor, and 479 (229 females [48%] and 250 males [52%]) received elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor for 4-6 weeks. Among 443 participants who received no CFTR modulator before elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor, 83 had at least one FDA-approved variant, of whom 81 (98%) were responders and continued elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor; in responders, mean absolute change in sweat chloride was -44·5 mmol/L (95% CI -39·1 to -49·8) and percentage of predicted FEV₁ (ppFEV₁) was 11·1 percentage points (95% CI 8·4 to 13·7; both comparisons p<0·0001). Among 360 participants with no FDA-approved variant and no previous CFTR modulator, 177 (49%) were responders; in responders, mean absolute change in sweat chloride was -20·5 mmol/L (-17·2 to -23·8) and ppFEV₁ was 13·2 percentage points (11·4 to 15·0; both comparisons p<0·0001). Among 36 participants who were receiving ivacaftor before elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor, 32 (89%) continued elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor. Of 251 individual CFTR variants, 64 (28 FDA-approved) were classified as responsive or possibly responsive to elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor, and 123 (two FDA-approved) as non-responsive or possibly non-responsive to elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor.

Interpretation: In France, over half of the population with cystic fibrosis without a F508del variant responded to elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor, with mo

Background: Garsorasib (D-1553; InventisBio, Shangai, China), a potent KRAS^G12C inhibitor, has shown promising antitumour activity in patients with KRAS^G12C-mutated (ie, Gly12Cys) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a phase 1 study. We report results from a phase 2 study conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of garsorasib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic KRAS^G12C-mutated NSCLC.

Methods: This open-label, multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial enrolled adult patients with KRAS^G12C-mutated NSCLC who had previously been treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors from 43 hospitals in China. Participants received 600 mg garsorasib orally twice per day. Tumour assessments were performed at baseline, at the end of every two cycles (of 21 days) for the first eight cycles, and at the end of every three cycles thereafter. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) as assessed by an independent review committee (IRC) following the guidelines in Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours, version 1.1. Efficacy and safety were assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of garsorasib. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05383898, and is active but no longer recruiting.

Findings: From June 17, 2022, to May 17, 2023, of 225 patients screened for eligibility, 123 patients were enrolled and treated with garsorasib. Of these 123 participants, the median age was 64 years (IQR 59-68), 108 (88%) were male and 15 (12%) were female. At data cutoff (Nov 17, 2023), the median follow-up duration was 7·9 months (IQR 6·3-10·4), and 82 (67%) of 123 patients had discontinued treatment. The IRC-confirmed ORR was 50% (61 of 123 patients; 95% CI 41-59). 117 (95%) of 123 patients reported treatment-related adverse events, with 61 (50%) experiencing grade 3 or higher events. The most common types of adverse events of grade 3 or higher associated with garsorasib were hepatic and gastrointestinal events, including increased liver enzymes, such as aspartate aminotransferase (21 [17%] of 123 participants), alanine aminotransferase (19 [15%] of 123 participants), and gamma-glutamyltransferase (28 [23%] of 123 participants); nausea (2 [2%] of 123 participants); and vomiting (2 [2%] of 123 participants). No new safety signals were identified, and most of the adverse events were well managed.

Interpretation: The results show that garsorasib has a high response rate, long duration of response, and an acceptable and manageable safety profile in patients with previously treated KRAS^G12C-mutated NSCLC. Garsorasib potentially provides a promising treatment option for this patient population.

Funding: InventisBio.

Background: A small amount of evidence suggests that nasal sprays, or physical activity and stress management, could shorten the duration of respiratory infections. This study aimed to assess the effect of nasal sprays or a behavioural intervention promoting physical activity and stress management on respiratory illnesses, compared with usual care.

Methods: This randomised, controlled, open-label, parallel-group trial was done at 332 general practitioner practices in the UK. Eligible adults (aged ≥18 years) had at least one comorbidity or risk factor increasing their risk of adverse outcomes due to respiratory illness (eg, immune compromise due to serious illness or medication; heart disease; asthma or lung disease; diabetes; mild hepatic impairment; stroke or severe neurological problem; obesity [BMI ≥30 kg/m²]; or age ≥65 years) or at least three self-reported respiratory tract infections in a normal year (ie, any year before the COVID-19 pandemic). Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) using a computerised system to: usual care (brief advice about managing illness); gel-based spray (two sprays per nostril at the first sign of an infection or after potential exposure to infection, up to 6 times per day); saline spray (two sprays per nostril at the first sign of an infection or after potential exposure to infection, up to 6 times per day); or a brief behavioural intervention in which participants were given access to a website promoting physical activity and stress management. The study was partially masked: neither investigators nor medical staff were aware of treatment allocation, and investigators who did the statistical analysis were unaware of treatment allocation. The sprays were relabelled to maintain participant masking. Outcomes were assessed using data from participants' completed monthly surveys and a survey at 6 months. The primary outcome was total number of days of illness due to self-reported respiratory tract illnesses (coughs, colds, sore throat, sinus or ear infections, influenza, or COVID-19) in the previous 6 months, assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population, which included all randomly assigned participants who had primary outcome data available. Key secondary outcomes were possible harms, including headache or facial pain, and antibiotic use, assessed in all randomly assigned participants. This trial was registered with ISRCTN, 17936080, and is closed to recruitment.

Findings: Between Dec 12, 2020, and April 7, 2023, of 19 475 individuals screened for eligibility, 13 799 participants were randomly assigned to usual care (n=3451), gel-based nasal spray (n=3448), saline nasal spray (n=3450), or the digital intervention promoting physical activity and stress management (n=3450). 11 612 participants had complete data for the primary outcome and were included in the primary outcome analysis (usual care group, n=2983; gel-based spray