Pub Date : 2024-09-18DOI: 10.1007/s11218-024-09938-8
Aylin Kirisci-Sarikaya, Halim Guner
With the global increase in refugees, understanding and improving the educational experiences of refugees has received more attention in academic research. This study aims to investigate the perspective of preservice teachers (PSTs) towards Syrian refugees, who are one of the largest groups of refugees in Turkey. The study explores the relationship between PSTs’ empathy, their social dominance orientation (SDO), and prejudice against Syrian refugees. The aim is to understand how PSTs’ perspectives on refugees can help prevent discrimination in education and develop targeted interventions and educational strategies. The study analyzed data from 726 PSTs using structural equation modelling. The findings show that there is a positive correlation between SDO and prejudice, and empathy partially mediates this relationship. Moreover, socioeconomic status and ethnicity significantly predict prejudice against refugees. The results are discussed in relation to the understanding of the bases and relations of prejudice, SDO, and empathy. The study suggests some practical implications for those working with PSTs and policymakers.
{"title":"Exploring preservice teachers’ social domination orientation and prejudice toward Syrian refugees: the mediation of empathy","authors":"Aylin Kirisci-Sarikaya, Halim Guner","doi":"10.1007/s11218-024-09938-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09938-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p>With the global increase in refugees, understanding and improving the educational experiences of refugees has received more attention in academic research. This study aims to investigate the perspective of preservice teachers (PSTs) towards Syrian refugees, who are one of the largest groups of refugees in Turkey. The study explores the relationship between PSTs’ empathy, their social dominance orientation (SDO), and prejudice against Syrian refugees. The aim is to understand how PSTs’ perspectives on refugees can help prevent discrimination in education and develop targeted interventions and educational strategies. The study analyzed data from 726 PSTs using structural equation modelling. The findings show that there is a positive correlation between SDO and prejudice, and empathy partially mediates this relationship. Moreover, socioeconomic status and ethnicity significantly predict prejudice against refugees. The results are discussed in relation to the understanding of the bases and relations of prejudice, SDO, and empathy. The study suggests some practical implications for those working with PSTs and policymakers.</p>","PeriodicalId":51467,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142259468","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-18DOI: 10.1007/s11218-024-09951-x
Franziska Muehlbacher, Mathias Mejeh, Melanie M. Keller, Gerda Hagenauer
Team teaching as a close form of teacher collaboration entails frequent interactions between the team-teaching partners in the classroom. During these interactions, the team teachers experience a variety of positive and negative emotions, triggered by their team partner. The teachers may express or suppress these emotions, depending on their habitual use of these emotion regulation strategies. In turn, the teachers’ daily emotions may be related to an important facet of teacher well-being, namely their daily work engagement. This study aims to investigate the related factors (habitual emotion regulation, daily work engagement) of team teachers’ daily positive and negative emotions triggered by the team partner in the classroom. Forty-seven Austrian team teachers working in secondary education completed a daily diary study, consisting of 15 diary entries, measuring their habitual emotion expression and suppression strategies, their daily positive and negative affect and daily work engagement. Multilevel regression analyses were conducted. Results show that positive and negative affect and work engagement vary substantially within and between team teachers. Random-intercept fixed-slope multilevel models indicate that the habitual use of authentic display of positive emotions is associated with daily positive affect, and teachers’ daily positive and negative affect significantly relate to their daily work engagement both on the within- and between-person level. This study underscores the important role that team teachers’ emotional experiences play regarding their work engagement. We draw theoretical and practical implications for the role of emotions during team-teaching practices.
{"title":"Teachers’ daily positive and negative affect and their relationship with teachers’ emotion regulation strategies and daily work engagement – results of a diary study among team teachers","authors":"Franziska Muehlbacher, Mathias Mejeh, Melanie M. Keller, Gerda Hagenauer","doi":"10.1007/s11218-024-09951-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09951-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Team teaching as a close form of teacher collaboration entails frequent interactions between the team-teaching partners in the classroom. During these interactions, the team teachers experience a variety of positive and negative emotions, triggered by their team partner. The teachers may express or suppress these emotions, depending on their habitual use of these emotion regulation strategies. In turn, the teachers’ daily emotions may be related to an important facet of teacher well-being, namely their daily work engagement. This study aims to investigate the related factors (habitual emotion regulation, daily work engagement) of team teachers’ daily positive and negative emotions triggered by the team partner in the classroom. Forty-seven Austrian team teachers working in secondary education completed a daily diary study, consisting of 15 diary entries, measuring their habitual emotion expression and suppression strategies, their daily positive and negative affect and daily work engagement. Multilevel regression analyses were conducted. Results show that positive and negative affect and work engagement vary substantially within and between team teachers. Random-intercept fixed-slope multilevel models indicate that the habitual use of authentic display of positive emotions is associated with daily positive affect, and teachers’ daily positive and negative affect significantly relate to their daily work engagement both on the within- and between-person level. This study underscores the important role that team teachers’ emotional experiences play regarding their work engagement. We draw theoretical and practical implications for the role of emotions during team-teaching practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":51467,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142259467","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-11DOI: 10.1007/s11218-024-09948-6
Katherine Muenks, Kathryn M. Kroeper, Elizabeth A. Canning, Mary C. Murphy
Advances in growth mindset scholarship now recognize the role of instructors’ mindsets in shaping classroom mindset culture. In the present paper, we synthesize the newly developing instructor mindset literature and report on a dataset that includes student (N = 765) and instructor (N = 44) reports of instructor mindset beliefs and behaviors. We organize our paper around four key questions: (1) What teaching behaviors signal instructors’ mindset beliefs to students? (2) What teaching behaviors are associated with instructors’ mindset beliefs? (3) Do students and instructors in the same classroom agree about instructors’ beliefs and behaviors? (4) Where should researchers target interventions aimed at promoting growth mindset cultures? We then discuss three problems that instructors might encounter when trying to create growth mindset cultures—when instructors inconsistently engage in growth mindset behaviors, when instructors unwittingly communicate a fixed mindset to students, and when students fail to notice instructors’ growth mindset behaviors—and potential solutions to these problems. We end with implications for instructor-focused interventions, which include both encouraging instructors to engage in growth-focused behaviors and to state clearly why their behaviors communicate a belief in student growth.
{"title":"Instructor mindset beliefs and behaviors: How do students and instructors perceive them?","authors":"Katherine Muenks, Kathryn M. Kroeper, Elizabeth A. Canning, Mary C. Murphy","doi":"10.1007/s11218-024-09948-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09948-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Advances in growth mindset scholarship now recognize the role of instructors’ mindsets in shaping classroom mindset culture. In the present paper, we synthesize the newly developing instructor mindset literature and report on a dataset that includes student (<i>N</i> = 765) and instructor (<i>N</i> = 44) reports of instructor mindset beliefs and behaviors. We organize our paper around four key questions: (1) What teaching behaviors signal instructors’ mindset beliefs to students? (2) What teaching behaviors are associated with instructors’ mindset beliefs? (3) Do students and instructors in the same classroom agree about instructors’ beliefs and behaviors? (4) Where should researchers target interventions aimed at promoting growth mindset cultures? We then discuss three problems that instructors might encounter when trying to create growth mindset cultures—when instructors inconsistently engage in growth mindset behaviors, when instructors unwittingly communicate a fixed mindset to students, and when students fail to notice instructors’ growth mindset behaviors—and potential solutions to these problems. We end with implications for instructor-focused interventions, which include both encouraging instructors to engage in growth-focused behaviors and to state clearly <i>why</i> their behaviors communicate a belief in student growth.</p>","PeriodicalId":51467,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142217465","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-09DOI: 10.1007/s11218-024-09952-w
Marko Lüftenegger, Joy Muth
Mindsets are crucial factors for individuals’ adaptive behavior in educational contexts. In meaning systems, these associations between mindsets and behavior are mediated through motivational aspects. It is generally assumed that students should also benefit if teachers adopt a growth mindset. Even though many studies have investigated mindset processes of students, analyses of teachers’ meaning systems are lacking. This study, therefore, examines relationships between teachers’ mindsets, self-efficacy, achievement goals (mastery, performance-avoidance), and instructional practices (goal structure dimensions of task, autonomy, recognition, grouping, evaluation, time). The sample of the questionnaire study comprises 650 Austrian in-service teachers (69.6% female; mean age 45.1 years; SD = 11.3) with an average of 19 years of teaching experience. Data was analyzed using latent mediation modeling with fixed mindset as a predictor, self-efficacy, mastery goals, performance-avoidance goals as mediators, and six mastery classroom goal structure dimensions as outcomes. The results indicated positive relations between a fixed mindset with performance-avoidance goals and negative relations with self-efficacy and mastery goals. Mastery goals and self-efficacy negatively fully mediated the effects of fixed mindsets on five of six mastery goal structure dimensions. No mediation was found for performance-avoidance goals except for the fixed mindset-autonomy and fixed mindset-grouping links. To conclude, the study’s findings support that a meaning system approach is also valid for teachers and provide insights into the associations between mindset, self-efficacy beliefs, achievement goals, and classroom practices.
{"title":"Teachers’ mindset meaning system: achievement goals, beliefs and classroom practices","authors":"Marko Lüftenegger, Joy Muth","doi":"10.1007/s11218-024-09952-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09952-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mindsets are crucial factors for individuals’ adaptive behavior in educational contexts. In meaning systems, these associations between mindsets and behavior are mediated through motivational aspects. It is generally assumed that students should also benefit if teachers adopt a growth mindset. Even though many studies have investigated mindset processes of students, analyses of teachers’ meaning systems are lacking. This study, therefore, examines relationships between teachers’ mindsets, self-efficacy, achievement goals (mastery, performance-avoidance), and instructional practices (goal structure dimensions of task, autonomy, recognition, grouping, evaluation, time). The sample of the questionnaire study comprises 650 Austrian in-service teachers (69.6% female; mean age 45.1 years; <i>SD</i> = 11.3) with an average of 19 years of teaching experience. Data was analyzed using latent mediation modeling with fixed mindset as a predictor, self-efficacy, mastery goals, performance-avoidance goals as mediators, and six mastery classroom goal structure dimensions as outcomes. The results indicated positive relations between a fixed mindset with performance-avoidance goals and negative relations with self-efficacy and mastery goals. Mastery goals and self-efficacy negatively fully mediated the effects of fixed mindsets on five of six mastery goal structure dimensions. No mediation was found for performance-avoidance goals except for the fixed mindset-autonomy and fixed mindset-grouping links. To conclude, the study’s findings support that a meaning system approach is also valid for teachers and provide insights into the associations between mindset, self-efficacy beliefs, achievement goals, and classroom practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":51467,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142217466","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-03DOI: 10.1007/s11218-024-09940-0
Summer S. Braun, Zachary T. Schornick, Avery K. Westbrooks, Erin R. Eickholz, Jeffrey G. Parker, Alison L. Hooper
Snark is a form of verbal aggression that uses humor to diminish a victim. The present study explored predictors of U.S. teachers’ use of snark in the classroom. Kindergarten-12th grade teachers (N = 516) self-reported on their social and emotional competencies (i.e., perspective taking, forgiveness, mindfulness, expressive suppression, and decision-making skills), experiences of occupational health and personal well-being (i.e., burnout, job satisfaction, depression, and life satisfaction) and snark use. Stepwise multilevel models indicated that teachers’ social and emotional competencies, and subsequently, their occupational health and well-being, explained significant portions of the variance in snark use. Specifically, teachers with greater perspective taking skills reported less frequent snark use, and those who used expressive suppression reported more frequent snark use. Burnout, job satisfaction, depression, and life satisfaction were all positively associated with greater snark use. Results are described in relation to research on adult social and emotional competencies, teachers’ occupational health and well-being, and teachers’ conflict management strategies. This study sets the stage for future research to investigate the effects of teachers’ snark use on student outcomes.
{"title":"Teachers’ social competencies, occupational health, and personal well-being are associated with their use of snark in the classroom","authors":"Summer S. Braun, Zachary T. Schornick, Avery K. Westbrooks, Erin R. Eickholz, Jeffrey G. Parker, Alison L. Hooper","doi":"10.1007/s11218-024-09940-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09940-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Snark is a form of verbal aggression that uses humor to diminish a victim. The present study explored predictors of U.S. teachers’ use of snark in the classroom. Kindergarten-12th grade teachers (<i>N</i> = 516) self-reported on their social and emotional competencies (i.e., perspective taking, forgiveness, mindfulness, expressive suppression, and decision-making skills), experiences of occupational health and personal well-being (i.e., burnout, job satisfaction, depression, and life satisfaction) and snark use. Stepwise multilevel models indicated that teachers’ social and emotional competencies, and subsequently, their occupational health and well-being, explained significant portions of the variance in snark use. Specifically, teachers with greater perspective taking skills reported less frequent snark use, and those who used expressive suppression reported more frequent snark use. Burnout, job satisfaction, depression, and life satisfaction were all positively associated with greater snark use. Results are described in relation to research on adult social and emotional competencies, teachers’ occupational health and well-being, and teachers’ conflict management strategies. This study sets the stage for future research to investigate the effects of teachers’ snark use on student outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51467,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142217502","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-24DOI: 10.1007/s11218-024-09953-9
Sungwha Kim, Hyun Ji Lee, Mimi Bong
Parents’ beliefs about the nature of ability are communicated to their children through parent–child interactions. Parental mindsets are one of the parental beliefs that have received increasing attention over recent years. However, their role in children’s motivation and achievement outcomes remains relatively underexplored. Moreover, most existing studies have measured parental mindsets as either reported by parents themselves or perceived by children only, making it difficult to develop a comprehensive understanding of their role. Yet, parents’ mindsets and children’s perceptions of their parents’ mindsets may not be identical, and one may be more important than the other in shaping children’s motivation and achievement. Using the data from 507 third- and fourth-graders and their parents in Korea, we examined how parents’ growth and fixed mindsets, both self-reported and child-perceived, predicted children’s achievement goals, persistence, and achievement in mathematics. Whereas the growth and fixed mindsets of parents correlated negatively with each other, there was no significant relationship between self-reported and child-perceived parental mindsets. Parents’ growth mindset positively predicted children’s mastery goals. In contrast, parents’ fixed mindset negatively predicted children’s mastery goals and positively predicted children’s ability-focused and normative performance goals. Children’s mastery goals in turn positively predicted their persistence and achievement. The indirect paths from parental mindsets to children’s persistence and achievement through children’s mastery goals were also significant. In general, the child-perceived mindsets of parents demonstrated a stronger predictive power than the self-reported mindsets of parents. The underexplored role of parental mindsets is discussed concerning children’s achievement goal adoption and learning.
{"title":"Parental mindsets as determinants of children’s achievement goals and performance in math","authors":"Sungwha Kim, Hyun Ji Lee, Mimi Bong","doi":"10.1007/s11218-024-09953-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09953-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Parents’ beliefs about the nature of ability are communicated to their children through parent–child interactions. Parental mindsets are one of the parental beliefs that have received increasing attention over recent years. However, their role in children’s motivation and achievement outcomes remains relatively underexplored. Moreover, most existing studies have measured parental mindsets as either reported by parents themselves or perceived by children only, making it difficult to develop a comprehensive understanding of their role. Yet, parents’ mindsets and children’s perceptions of their parents’ mindsets may not be identical, and one may be more important than the other in shaping children’s motivation and achievement. Using the data from 507 third- and fourth-graders and their parents in Korea, we examined how parents’ growth and fixed mindsets, both self-reported and child-perceived, predicted children’s achievement goals, persistence, and achievement in mathematics. Whereas the growth and fixed mindsets of parents correlated negatively with each other, there was no significant relationship between self-reported and child-perceived parental mindsets. Parents’ growth mindset positively predicted children’s mastery goals. In contrast, parents’ fixed mindset negatively predicted children’s mastery goals and positively predicted children’s ability-focused and normative performance goals. Children’s mastery goals in turn positively predicted their persistence and achievement. The indirect paths from parental mindsets to children’s persistence and achievement through children’s mastery goals were also significant. In general, the child-perceived mindsets of parents demonstrated a stronger predictive power than the self-reported mindsets of parents. The underexplored role of parental mindsets is discussed concerning children’s achievement goal adoption and learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":51467,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142217480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-22DOI: 10.1007/s11218-024-09947-7
Lana Pehar, Dinka Čorkalo Biruški, Blaž Rebernjak
While intergroup contacts and social norms both have important roles in regulating intergroup relations, their effects on intergroup outcomes have mostly been examined independently from each other. The purpose of this longitudinal study was to explore the role of perceived ingroup norms about intergroup contact in the relationships between both direct and extended intergroup friendships and positive and negative outgroup orientations. To provide a more comprehensive normative perspective of intergroup contact, we tested for both cross-sectional and longitudinal, as well as moderation and mediation effects of perceived peer, parental, and school contact norms. The research was carried out in two waves on a sample of 1,128 majority and minority adolescents from four multiethnic communities in the Republic of Croatia. The results indicated that all three types of perceived ingroup contact norms exclusively mediate the cross-sectional, but not longitudinal, relationships between both forms of friendships and positive and negative outgroup orientations, highlighting the importance and consistency of perceived parental and school normative influences.
{"title":"The role of perceived ingroup norms about intergroup contact in intergroup friendship effects","authors":"Lana Pehar, Dinka Čorkalo Biruški, Blaž Rebernjak","doi":"10.1007/s11218-024-09947-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09947-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p>While intergroup contacts and social norms both have important roles in regulating intergroup relations, their effects on intergroup outcomes have mostly been examined independently from each other. The purpose of this longitudinal study was to explore the role of perceived ingroup norms about intergroup contact in the relationships between both direct and extended intergroup friendships and positive and negative outgroup orientations. To provide a more comprehensive normative perspective of intergroup contact, we tested for both cross-sectional and longitudinal, as well as moderation and mediation effects of perceived peer, parental, and school contact norms. The research was carried out in two waves on a sample of 1,128 majority and minority adolescents from four multiethnic communities in the Republic of Croatia. The results indicated that all three types of perceived ingroup contact norms exclusively mediate the cross-sectional, but not longitudinal, relationships between both forms of friendships and positive and negative outgroup orientations, highlighting the importance and consistency of perceived parental and school normative influences.</p>","PeriodicalId":51467,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142217470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-22DOI: 10.1007/s11218-024-09945-9
Juan Cai, Qingyun Wen, Meijie Bi, Koen Lombaerts
Inclusive education, crucial for human rights and sustainable development, focuses on integrating and empowering students of varying needs and abilities. Understanding the interaction between Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and Differentiated Instruction (DI) is key for educators and stakeholders to implement inclusive strategies effectively. Yet, there is a significant gap in empirical research exploring this relationship. Therefore, this study examined a proposed model combining growth mindset and practice factors (ongoing assessment and flexible grouping), which explained how UDL is related to DI. Structural equation modeling was used to analyze data from 647 in-service teachers. The findings showed that practice factors independently and in combination with a growth mindset fully mediated the relationship between UDL and DI. The implications for the research community, teachers, and teacher educators to implement UDL and DI are presented.
全纳教育对人权和可持续发展至关重要,其重点是融合不同需求和能力的学 生,并增强他们的能力。了解 "通用学习设计"(UDL)与 "差异化教学"(DI)之间的相互作用,是教育工作者和相关人员有效实施全纳战略的关键。然而,在探索这种关系的实证研究方面还存在着巨大的差距。因此,本研究考察了一个结合了成长心态和实践因素(持续评估和灵活分组)的拟议模型,该模型解释了 UDL 与 DI 的关系。研究采用结构方程模型分析了 647 名在职教师的数据。研究结果表明,独立的实践因素以及与成长型思维相结合的实践因素完全调节了 UDL 与 DI 之间的关系。本文阐述了研究界、教师和教师教育工作者实施 UDL 和 DI 的意义。
{"title":"How Universal Design for Learning (UDL) is related to Differentiated Instruction (DI): The mediation role of growth mindset and teachers’ practices factors","authors":"Juan Cai, Qingyun Wen, Meijie Bi, Koen Lombaerts","doi":"10.1007/s11218-024-09945-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09945-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Inclusive education, crucial for human rights and sustainable development, focuses on integrating and empowering students of varying needs and abilities. Understanding the interaction between Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and Differentiated Instruction (DI) is key for educators and stakeholders to implement inclusive strategies effectively. Yet, there is a significant gap in empirical research exploring this relationship. Therefore, this study examined a proposed model combining growth mindset and practice factors (ongoing assessment and flexible grouping), which explained how UDL is related to DI. Structural equation modeling was used to analyze data from 647 in-service teachers. The findings showed that practice factors independently and in combination with a growth mindset fully mediated the relationship between UDL and DI. The implications for the research community, teachers, and teacher educators to implement UDL and DI are presented.</p>","PeriodicalId":51467,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142217467","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-16DOI: 10.1007/s11218-024-09949-5
Behiye Dağdeviren Ertaş, Murat Özdemir
Attitudes and behaviors towards work enable teachers to perform organizational roles willingly in the educational process. Teachers who do their jobs with great enthusiasm, passion, and commitment are influential in increasing student success. For this reason, there is a need to investigate the individual and organizational factors that play a role in teachers’ work engagement. Previous research has shown that collective teacher efficacy is one of the critical factors that play a role in teachers’ work engagement. However, researchers need to sufficiently focus on the holistic effects of collective teacher efficacy, organizational commitment, and work engagement in teacher research. This research aims to investigate a newly developed model that explores the direct and indirect links among collective teacher efficacy, organizational commitment, and work engagement. The study involves 414 teachers working in state primary schools in 12 regions of Türkiye. A mediation analysis was conducted using structural equation modeling to assess the accuracy of the proposed model in this study. The results of the analysis demonstrate that organizational commitment is essential in mediating the relationship between collective teacher efficacy and work engagement. This study contributes significantly to the existing literature by offering valuable insights into the influence of collective teacher efficacy on work engagement among teachers in Türkiye. Specifically, it presents crucial findings regarding the impact of collective teacher efficacy on organizational commitment, highlighting the mediating role of this construct in the relationship between collective teacher efficacy and work engagement.
{"title":"The mediation of organizational commitment between collective teacher efficacy and work engagement","authors":"Behiye Dağdeviren Ertaş, Murat Özdemir","doi":"10.1007/s11218-024-09949-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09949-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Attitudes and behaviors towards work enable teachers to perform organizational roles willingly in the educational process. Teachers who do their jobs with great enthusiasm, passion, and commitment are influential in increasing student success. For this reason, there is a need to investigate the individual and organizational factors that play a role in teachers’ work engagement. Previous research has shown that collective teacher efficacy is one of the critical factors that play a role in teachers’ work engagement. However, researchers need to sufficiently focus on the holistic effects of collective teacher efficacy, organizational commitment, and work engagement in teacher research. This research aims to investigate a newly developed model that explores the direct and indirect links among collective teacher efficacy, organizational commitment, and work engagement. The study involves 414 teachers working in state primary schools in 12 regions of Türkiye. A mediation analysis was conducted using structural equation modeling to assess the accuracy of the proposed model in this study. The results of the analysis demonstrate that organizational commitment is essential in mediating the relationship between collective teacher efficacy and work engagement. This study contributes significantly to the existing literature by offering valuable insights into the influence of collective teacher efficacy on work engagement among teachers in Türkiye. Specifically, it presents crucial findings regarding the impact of collective teacher efficacy on organizational commitment, highlighting the mediating role of this construct in the relationship between collective teacher efficacy and work engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":51467,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142217471","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-13DOI: 10.1007/s11218-024-09950-y
Maureen C. Fleming, Howard C. Stevenson, Emily Aisenbrey, Benedict T. McWhirter
Data from 318 diverse high school students from three different types of high schools in the United States were collected. School types varied by location (e.g., suburban, urban), size, and student demographics (e.g., race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status). Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was conducted to examine the factor structure of the STRESS-Y. Mean comparisons were performed to assess variations in Racial Stress Appraisal across different school types. The EFA of the STRESS-Y confirmed its factor structure, supporting its validity as a measure of RSA in youth and we were able to extract two robust factors—Racial Threat Appraisal and Racial Support Appraisal. Mean comparisons revealed that Racial Threat Appraisal and Racial Support Appraisal varied across different school types, highlighting the influence of school context on students' experiences of racial stress. This study provides evidence for the validity of the STRESS-Y as a measure of Racial Stress Appraisal in youth. The findings demonstrate the importance of considering school type as a factor influencing students' experiences of racial stress as well as how support, racial coping, and stress management skills may help mitigate ongoing interpersonal harm that youth are experiencing. The validated measure and the understanding of the factors contributing to Racial Stress Appraisal can inform interventions aimed at supporting students in managing and coping with racial stressors in their respective school environments.
{"title":"Using RECAST theory to examine racial stress appraisal across high schools: Differences in racial threat and support","authors":"Maureen C. Fleming, Howard C. Stevenson, Emily Aisenbrey, Benedict T. McWhirter","doi":"10.1007/s11218-024-09950-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09950-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Data from 318 diverse high school students from three different types of high schools in the United States were collected. School types varied by location (e.g., suburban, urban), size, and student demographics (e.g., race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status). Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was conducted to examine the factor structure of the STRESS-Y. Mean comparisons were performed to assess variations in Racial Stress Appraisal across different school types. The EFA of the STRESS-Y confirmed its factor structure, supporting its validity as a measure of RSA in youth and we were able to extract two robust factors—Racial Threat Appraisal and Racial Support Appraisal. Mean comparisons revealed that Racial Threat Appraisal and Racial Support Appraisal varied across different school types, highlighting the influence of school context on students' experiences of racial stress. This study provides evidence for the validity of the STRESS-Y as a measure of Racial Stress Appraisal in youth. The findings demonstrate the importance of considering school type as a factor influencing students' experiences of racial stress as well as how support, racial coping, and stress management skills may help mitigate ongoing interpersonal harm that youth are experiencing. The validated measure and the understanding of the factors contributing to Racial Stress Appraisal can inform interventions aimed at supporting students in managing and coping with racial stressors in their respective school environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":51467,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142217472","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}