首页 > 最新文献

Social Psychology of Education最新文献

英文 中文
Exploring preservice teachers’ social domination orientation and prejudice toward Syrian refugees: the mediation of empathy 探索职前教师的社会支配取向和对叙利亚难民的偏见:移情的中介作用
IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI: 10.1007/s11218-024-09938-8
Aylin Kirisci-Sarikaya, Halim Guner

With the global increase in refugees, understanding and improving the educational experiences of refugees has received more attention in academic research. This study aims to investigate the perspective of preservice teachers (PSTs) towards Syrian refugees, who are one of the largest groups of refugees in Turkey. The study explores the relationship between PSTs’ empathy, their social dominance orientation (SDO), and prejudice against Syrian refugees. The aim is to understand how PSTs’ perspectives on refugees can help prevent discrimination in education and develop targeted interventions and educational strategies. The study analyzed data from 726 PSTs using structural equation modelling. The findings show that there is a positive correlation between SDO and prejudice, and empathy partially mediates this relationship. Moreover, socioeconomic status and ethnicity significantly predict prejudice against refugees. The results are discussed in relation to the understanding of the bases and relations of prejudice, SDO, and empathy. The study suggests some practical implications for those working with PSTs and policymakers.

随着全球难民人数的增加,了解和改善难民的教育经历受到了学术研究的更多关注。本研究旨在调查职前教师(PSTs)对叙利亚难民(土耳其最大的难民群体之一)的看法。本研究探讨了职前教师的同理心、社会主导取向(SDO)和对叙利亚难民的偏见之间的关系。目的是了解小学生对难民的看法如何有助于防止教育歧视,并制定有针对性的干预措施和教育策略。研究使用结构方程模型分析了来自 726 名小学生的数据。研究结果表明,SDO 与偏见之间存在正相关,移情在一定程度上调节了这种关系。此外,社会经济地位和种族在很大程度上预测了对难民的偏见。研究结果与对偏见、SDO 和移情的基础和关系的理解有关。这项研究为那些与PST合作的人员和政策制定者提出了一些实际意义。
{"title":"Exploring preservice teachers’ social domination orientation and prejudice toward Syrian refugees: the mediation of empathy","authors":"Aylin Kirisci-Sarikaya, Halim Guner","doi":"10.1007/s11218-024-09938-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09938-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p>With the global increase in refugees, understanding and improving the educational experiences of refugees has received more attention in academic research. This study aims to investigate the perspective of preservice teachers (PSTs) towards Syrian refugees, who are one of the largest groups of refugees in Turkey. The study explores the relationship between PSTs’ empathy, their social dominance orientation (SDO), and prejudice against Syrian refugees. The aim is to understand how PSTs’ perspectives on refugees can help prevent discrimination in education and develop targeted interventions and educational strategies. The study analyzed data from 726 PSTs using structural equation modelling. The findings show that there is a positive correlation between SDO and prejudice, and empathy partially mediates this relationship. Moreover, socioeconomic status and ethnicity significantly predict prejudice against refugees. The results are discussed in relation to the understanding of the bases and relations of prejudice, SDO, and empathy. The study suggests some practical implications for those working with PSTs and policymakers.</p>","PeriodicalId":51467,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142259468","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Teachers’ daily positive and negative affect and their relationship with teachers’ emotion regulation strategies and daily work engagement – results of a diary study among team teachers 教师的日常积极和消极情绪及其与教师情绪调节策略和日常工作投入的关系--团队教师日记研究的结果
IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI: 10.1007/s11218-024-09951-x
Franziska Muehlbacher, Mathias Mejeh, Melanie M. Keller, Gerda Hagenauer

Team teaching as a close form of teacher collaboration entails frequent interactions between the team-teaching partners in the classroom. During these interactions, the team teachers experience a variety of positive and negative emotions, triggered by their team partner. The teachers may express or suppress these emotions, depending on their habitual use of these emotion regulation strategies. In turn, the teachers’ daily emotions may be related to an important facet of teacher well-being, namely their daily work engagement. This study aims to investigate the related factors (habitual emotion regulation, daily work engagement) of team teachers’ daily positive and negative emotions triggered by the team partner in the classroom. Forty-seven Austrian team teachers working in secondary education completed a daily diary study, consisting of 15 diary entries, measuring their habitual emotion expression and suppression strategies, their daily positive and negative affect and daily work engagement. Multilevel regression analyses were conducted. Results show that positive and negative affect and work engagement vary substantially within and between team teachers. Random-intercept fixed-slope multilevel models indicate that the habitual use of authentic display of positive emotions is associated with daily positive affect, and teachers’ daily positive and negative affect significantly relate to their daily work engagement both on the within- and between-person level. This study underscores the important role that team teachers’ emotional experiences play regarding their work engagement. We draw theoretical and practical implications for the role of emotions during team-teaching practices.

团队教学作为一种密切的教师合作形式,需要团队教学伙伴在课堂上频繁互动。在这些互动过程中,团队教师会体验到由团队伙伴引发的各种积极和消极情绪。教师可能会表达或压抑这些情绪,这取决于他们是否习惯使用这些情绪调节策略。反过来,教师的日常情绪可能与教师幸福感的一个重要方面,即教师的日常工作投入有关。本研究旨在调查团队教师在课堂上由团队伙伴引发的日常积极和消极情绪的相关因素(习惯性情绪调节、日常工作投入)。47 名奥地利中学团队教师完成了一项日常日记研究,包括 15 篇日记,测量了他们的习惯性情绪表达和抑制策略、日常积极和消极情绪以及日常工作投入。研究进行了多层次回归分析。结果表明,团队教师内部和团队教师之间的积极和消极情绪以及工作投入程度存在很大差异。随机截距固定斜率多层次模型表明,习惯性使用真实的积极情绪表现与日常积极情绪相关,而教师的日常积极情绪和消极情绪在人内和人际层面上都与他们的日常工作投入有显著关系。这项研究强调了团队教师的情绪体验对其工作投入的重要作用。我们得出了团队教学实践中情绪作用的理论和实践意义。
{"title":"Teachers’ daily positive and negative affect and their relationship with teachers’ emotion regulation strategies and daily work engagement – results of a diary study among team teachers","authors":"Franziska Muehlbacher, Mathias Mejeh, Melanie M. Keller, Gerda Hagenauer","doi":"10.1007/s11218-024-09951-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09951-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Team teaching as a close form of teacher collaboration entails frequent interactions between the team-teaching partners in the classroom. During these interactions, the team teachers experience a variety of positive and negative emotions, triggered by their team partner. The teachers may express or suppress these emotions, depending on their habitual use of these emotion regulation strategies. In turn, the teachers’ daily emotions may be related to an important facet of teacher well-being, namely their daily work engagement. This study aims to investigate the related factors (habitual emotion regulation, daily work engagement) of team teachers’ daily positive and negative emotions triggered by the team partner in the classroom. Forty-seven Austrian team teachers working in secondary education completed a daily diary study, consisting of 15 diary entries, measuring their habitual emotion expression and suppression strategies, their daily positive and negative affect and daily work engagement. Multilevel regression analyses were conducted. Results show that positive and negative affect and work engagement vary substantially within and between team teachers. Random-intercept fixed-slope multilevel models indicate that the habitual use of authentic display of positive emotions is associated with daily positive affect, and teachers’ daily positive and negative affect significantly relate to their daily work engagement both on the within- and between-person level. This study underscores the important role that team teachers’ emotional experiences play regarding their work engagement. We draw theoretical and practical implications for the role of emotions during team-teaching practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":51467,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142259467","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Instructor mindset beliefs and behaviors: How do students and instructors perceive them? 教员的心态信念和行为:学生和教员如何看待它们?
IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI: 10.1007/s11218-024-09948-6
Katherine Muenks, Kathryn M. Kroeper, Elizabeth A. Canning, Mary C. Murphy

Advances in growth mindset scholarship now recognize the role of instructors’ mindsets in shaping classroom mindset culture. In the present paper, we synthesize the newly developing instructor mindset literature and report on a dataset that includes student (N = 765) and instructor (N = 44) reports of instructor mindset beliefs and behaviors. We organize our paper around four key questions: (1) What teaching behaviors signal instructors’ mindset beliefs to students? (2) What teaching behaviors are associated with instructors’ mindset beliefs? (3) Do students and instructors in the same classroom agree about instructors’ beliefs and behaviors? (4) Where should researchers target interventions aimed at promoting growth mindset cultures? We then discuss three problems that instructors might encounter when trying to create growth mindset cultures—when instructors inconsistently engage in growth mindset behaviors, when instructors unwittingly communicate a fixed mindset to students, and when students fail to notice instructors’ growth mindset behaviors—and potential solutions to these problems. We end with implications for instructor-focused interventions, which include both encouraging instructors to engage in growth-focused behaviors and to state clearly why their behaviors communicate a belief in student growth.

现在,成长型思维模式学术研究的进展已经认识到指导教师的思维模式在塑造课堂思维模式文化中的作用。在本文中,我们综合了新近发展起来的教师思维模式文献,并报告了一个数据集,其中包括学生(N = 765)和教师(N = 44)对教师思维模式信念和行为的报告。本文围绕四个关键问题展开:(1) 哪些教学行为向学生传达了教师的思维模式信念?(2) 哪些教学行为与教师的心态信念相关?(3) 在同一课堂上,学生和教师对教师的信念和行为是否一致?(4) 研究人员应在哪些方面采取干预措施,以促进成长型思维模式文化?然后,我们讨论了教师在尝试创建成长型思维模式文化时可能遇到的三个问题--当教师的成长型思维模式行为不一致时、当教师无意中向学生传达固定型思维模式时、当学生没有注意到教师的成长型思维模式行为时--以及解决这些问题的潜在方案。最后,我们阐述了以教师为中心的干预措施的意义,其中包括鼓励教师参与以成长为中心的行为,并明确说明为什么他们的行为传达了对学生成长的信念。
{"title":"Instructor mindset beliefs and behaviors: How do students and instructors perceive them?","authors":"Katherine Muenks, Kathryn M. Kroeper, Elizabeth A. Canning, Mary C. Murphy","doi":"10.1007/s11218-024-09948-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09948-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Advances in growth mindset scholarship now recognize the role of instructors’ mindsets in shaping classroom mindset culture. In the present paper, we synthesize the newly developing instructor mindset literature and report on a dataset that includes student (<i>N</i> = 765) and instructor (<i>N</i> = 44) reports of instructor mindset beliefs and behaviors. We organize our paper around four key questions: (1) What teaching behaviors signal instructors’ mindset beliefs to students? (2) What teaching behaviors are associated with instructors’ mindset beliefs? (3) Do students and instructors in the same classroom agree about instructors’ beliefs and behaviors? (4) Where should researchers target interventions aimed at promoting growth mindset cultures? We then discuss three problems that instructors might encounter when trying to create growth mindset cultures—when instructors inconsistently engage in growth mindset behaviors, when instructors unwittingly communicate a fixed mindset to students, and when students fail to notice instructors’ growth mindset behaviors—and potential solutions to these problems. We end with implications for instructor-focused interventions, which include both encouraging instructors to engage in growth-focused behaviors and to state clearly <i>why</i> their behaviors communicate a belief in student growth.</p>","PeriodicalId":51467,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142217465","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Teachers’ mindset meaning system: achievement goals, beliefs and classroom practices 教师的心态意义系统:成就目标、信念和课堂实践
IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI: 10.1007/s11218-024-09952-w
Marko Lüftenegger, Joy Muth

Mindsets are crucial factors for individuals’ adaptive behavior in educational contexts. In meaning systems, these associations between mindsets and behavior are mediated through motivational aspects. It is generally assumed that students should also benefit if teachers adopt a growth mindset. Even though many studies have investigated mindset processes of students, analyses of teachers’ meaning systems are lacking. This study, therefore, examines relationships between teachers’ mindsets, self-efficacy, achievement goals (mastery, performance-avoidance), and instructional practices (goal structure dimensions of task, autonomy, recognition, grouping, evaluation, time). The sample of the questionnaire study comprises 650 Austrian in-service teachers (69.6% female; mean age 45.1 years; SD = 11.3) with an average of 19 years of teaching experience. Data was analyzed using latent mediation modeling with fixed mindset as a predictor, self-efficacy, mastery goals, performance-avoidance goals as mediators, and six mastery classroom goal structure dimensions as outcomes. The results indicated positive relations between a fixed mindset with performance-avoidance goals and negative relations with self-efficacy and mastery goals. Mastery goals and self-efficacy negatively fully mediated the effects of fixed mindsets on five of six mastery goal structure dimensions. No mediation was found for performance-avoidance goals except for the fixed mindset-autonomy and fixed mindset-grouping links. To conclude, the study’s findings support that a meaning system approach is also valid for teachers and provide insights into the associations between mindset, self-efficacy beliefs, achievement goals, and classroom practices.

心态是个人在教育环境中适应行为的关键因素。在意义系统中,思维定势与行为之间的联系是通过动机方面来调节的。一般认为,如果教师采用成长型思维模式,学生也会从中受益。尽管许多研究都对学生的心态过程进行了调查,但却缺乏对教师意义系统的分析。因此,本研究探讨了教师的心态、自我效能感、成就目标(掌握、避免成绩)和教学实践(任务、自主、认可、分组、评价、时间等目标结构维度)之间的关系。问卷调查的样本包括 650 名奥地利在职教师(69.6% 为女性;平均年龄 45.1 岁;SD = 11.3),平均教龄 19 年。研究采用潜中介模型对数据进行分析,以固定心态为预测因子,自我效能感、掌握目标、绩效-逃避目标为中介因子,六个掌握课堂目标结构维度为结果。结果表明,固定心态与成绩-逃避目标之间存在正相关,而与自我效能感和掌握目标之间存在负相关。在六个掌握型目标结构维度中,掌握型目标和自我效能感完全负向调节了固定型思维对其中五个维度的影响。除了固定型思维模式与自主性和固定型思维模式与群体性之间的联系之外,没有发现其他因素对绩效规避目标有任何调节作用。总之,研究结果支持意义系统方法同样适用于教师,并为思维定势、自我效能感信念、成就目标和课堂实践之间的关联提供了见解。
{"title":"Teachers’ mindset meaning system: achievement goals, beliefs and classroom practices","authors":"Marko Lüftenegger, Joy Muth","doi":"10.1007/s11218-024-09952-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09952-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mindsets are crucial factors for individuals’ adaptive behavior in educational contexts. In meaning systems, these associations between mindsets and behavior are mediated through motivational aspects. It is generally assumed that students should also benefit if teachers adopt a growth mindset. Even though many studies have investigated mindset processes of students, analyses of teachers’ meaning systems are lacking. This study, therefore, examines relationships between teachers’ mindsets, self-efficacy, achievement goals (mastery, performance-avoidance), and instructional practices (goal structure dimensions of task, autonomy, recognition, grouping, evaluation, time). The sample of the questionnaire study comprises 650 Austrian in-service teachers (69.6% female; mean age 45.1 years; <i>SD</i> = 11.3) with an average of 19 years of teaching experience. Data was analyzed using latent mediation modeling with fixed mindset as a predictor, self-efficacy, mastery goals, performance-avoidance goals as mediators, and six mastery classroom goal structure dimensions as outcomes. The results indicated positive relations between a fixed mindset with performance-avoidance goals and negative relations with self-efficacy and mastery goals. Mastery goals and self-efficacy negatively fully mediated the effects of fixed mindsets on five of six mastery goal structure dimensions. No mediation was found for performance-avoidance goals except for the fixed mindset-autonomy and fixed mindset-grouping links. To conclude, the study’s findings support that a meaning system approach is also valid for teachers and provide insights into the associations between mindset, self-efficacy beliefs, achievement goals, and classroom practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":51467,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142217466","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Teachers’ social competencies, occupational health, and personal well-being are associated with their use of snark in the classroom 教师的社交能力、职业健康和个人幸福感与他们在课堂上使用冷笑话有关
IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI: 10.1007/s11218-024-09940-0
Summer S. Braun, Zachary T. Schornick, Avery K. Westbrooks, Erin R. Eickholz, Jeffrey G. Parker, Alison L. Hooper

Snark is a form of verbal aggression that uses humor to diminish a victim. The present study explored predictors of U.S. teachers’ use of snark in the classroom. Kindergarten-12th grade teachers (N = 516) self-reported on their social and emotional competencies (i.e., perspective taking, forgiveness, mindfulness, expressive suppression, and decision-making skills), experiences of occupational health and personal well-being (i.e., burnout, job satisfaction, depression, and life satisfaction) and snark use. Stepwise multilevel models indicated that teachers’ social and emotional competencies, and subsequently, their occupational health and well-being, explained significant portions of the variance in snark use. Specifically, teachers with greater perspective taking skills reported less frequent snark use, and those who used expressive suppression reported more frequent snark use. Burnout, job satisfaction, depression, and life satisfaction were all positively associated with greater snark use. Results are described in relation to research on adult social and emotional competencies, teachers’ occupational health and well-being, and teachers’ conflict management strategies. This study sets the stage for future research to investigate the effects of teachers’ snark use on student outcomes.

冷嘲热讽是一种语言攻击形式,它利用幽默来贬低受害者。本研究探讨了美国教师在课堂上使用 "讽刺 "的预测因素。幼儿园至十二年级的教师(人数= 516)自我报告了他们的社会和情感能力(即:透视、宽恕、正念、表达压抑和决策技能)、职业健康体验和个人幸福感(即:职业倦怠、工作满意度、抑郁和生活满意度)以及使用讥讽的情况。逐步多层次模型表明,教师的社会和情感能力,以及随后的职业健康和幸福感,在很大程度上解释了教师使用 "刻薄话 "的差异。具体而言,具有较强的透视能力的教师较少使用讽刺语言,而那些使用表达性压制的教师使用讽刺语言的频率较高。职业倦怠、工作满意度、抑郁和生活满意度都与更多地使用讽刺语言呈正相关。研究结果与有关成人社交和情感能力、教师职业健康和幸福感以及教师冲突管理策略的研究相关联。本研究为今后调查教师使用 "咆哮 "对学生成绩的影响奠定了基础。
{"title":"Teachers’ social competencies, occupational health, and personal well-being are associated with their use of snark in the classroom","authors":"Summer S. Braun, Zachary T. Schornick, Avery K. Westbrooks, Erin R. Eickholz, Jeffrey G. Parker, Alison L. Hooper","doi":"10.1007/s11218-024-09940-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09940-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Snark is a form of verbal aggression that uses humor to diminish a victim. The present study explored predictors of U.S. teachers’ use of snark in the classroom. Kindergarten-12th grade teachers (<i>N</i> = 516) self-reported on their social and emotional competencies (i.e., perspective taking, forgiveness, mindfulness, expressive suppression, and decision-making skills), experiences of occupational health and personal well-being (i.e., burnout, job satisfaction, depression, and life satisfaction) and snark use. Stepwise multilevel models indicated that teachers’ social and emotional competencies, and subsequently, their occupational health and well-being, explained significant portions of the variance in snark use. Specifically, teachers with greater perspective taking skills reported less frequent snark use, and those who used expressive suppression reported more frequent snark use. Burnout, job satisfaction, depression, and life satisfaction were all positively associated with greater snark use. Results are described in relation to research on adult social and emotional competencies, teachers’ occupational health and well-being, and teachers’ conflict management strategies. This study sets the stage for future research to investigate the effects of teachers’ snark use on student outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51467,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142217502","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Parental mindsets as determinants of children’s achievement goals and performance in math 父母的心态是儿童数学成就目标和成绩的决定因素
IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Pub Date : 2024-08-24 DOI: 10.1007/s11218-024-09953-9
Sungwha Kim, Hyun Ji Lee, Mimi Bong

Parents’ beliefs about the nature of ability are communicated to their children through parent–child interactions. Parental mindsets are one of the parental beliefs that have received increasing attention over recent years. However, their role in children’s motivation and achievement outcomes remains relatively underexplored. Moreover, most existing studies have measured parental mindsets as either reported by parents themselves or perceived by children only, making it difficult to develop a comprehensive understanding of their role. Yet, parents’ mindsets and children’s perceptions of their parents’ mindsets may not be identical, and one may be more important than the other in shaping children’s motivation and achievement. Using the data from 507 third- and fourth-graders and their parents in Korea, we examined how parents’ growth and fixed mindsets, both self-reported and child-perceived, predicted children’s achievement goals, persistence, and achievement in mathematics. Whereas the growth and fixed mindsets of parents correlated negatively with each other, there was no significant relationship between self-reported and child-perceived parental mindsets. Parents’ growth mindset positively predicted children’s mastery goals. In contrast, parents’ fixed mindset negatively predicted children’s mastery goals and positively predicted children’s ability-focused and normative performance goals. Children’s mastery goals in turn positively predicted their persistence and achievement. The indirect paths from parental mindsets to children’s persistence and achievement through children’s mastery goals were also significant. In general, the child-perceived mindsets of parents demonstrated a stronger predictive power than the self-reported mindsets of parents. The underexplored role of parental mindsets is discussed concerning children’s achievement goal adoption and learning.

父母对能力本质的信念是通过亲子互动传达给子女的。父母的心态是近年来日益受到关注的父母信念之一。然而,他们在孩子的学习动机和学习成绩方面所起的作用还相对缺乏研究。此外,大多数现有研究都是根据父母自己的报告或儿童的感知来衡量父母的心态,因此很难对父母心态的作用形成全面的认识。然而,父母的心态和子女对父母心态的看法可能并不完全相同,在影响子女的学习动机和成绩方面,二者中的一个可能比另一个更重要。利用韩国 507 名三、四年级学生及其父母的数据,我们研究了父母的成长型思维模式和固定型思维模式(包括自我报告的和孩子感知的)如何预测孩子的数学成就目标、坚持性和成就。父母的成长型思维模式和固定型思维模式之间呈负相关,而父母自我报告的思维模式和儿童感知的思维模式之间没有显著关系。家长的成长型思维模式对孩子的掌握目标有积极的预测作用。相反,父母的固定心态对儿童的掌握目标有负面预测作用,而对儿童的能力为重和规范表现目标有正面预测作用。儿童的掌握目标反过来又对他们的坚持性和成就有积极的预测作用。通过儿童的掌握目标,从父母的思维定势到儿童的坚持性和成就的间接路径也是显著的。总体而言,儿童对父母心态的认知比父母自我报告的心态具有更强的预测能力。本文讨论了父母的心态在儿童的成就目标采纳和学习方面所起的作用,这种作用尚未得到充分探讨。
{"title":"Parental mindsets as determinants of children’s achievement goals and performance in math","authors":"Sungwha Kim, Hyun Ji Lee, Mimi Bong","doi":"10.1007/s11218-024-09953-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09953-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Parents’ beliefs about the nature of ability are communicated to their children through parent–child interactions. Parental mindsets are one of the parental beliefs that have received increasing attention over recent years. However, their role in children’s motivation and achievement outcomes remains relatively underexplored. Moreover, most existing studies have measured parental mindsets as either reported by parents themselves or perceived by children only, making it difficult to develop a comprehensive understanding of their role. Yet, parents’ mindsets and children’s perceptions of their parents’ mindsets may not be identical, and one may be more important than the other in shaping children’s motivation and achievement. Using the data from 507 third- and fourth-graders and their parents in Korea, we examined how parents’ growth and fixed mindsets, both self-reported and child-perceived, predicted children’s achievement goals, persistence, and achievement in mathematics. Whereas the growth and fixed mindsets of parents correlated negatively with each other, there was no significant relationship between self-reported and child-perceived parental mindsets. Parents’ growth mindset positively predicted children’s mastery goals. In contrast, parents’ fixed mindset negatively predicted children’s mastery goals and positively predicted children’s ability-focused and normative performance goals. Children’s mastery goals in turn positively predicted their persistence and achievement. The indirect paths from parental mindsets to children’s persistence and achievement through children’s mastery goals were also significant. In general, the child-perceived mindsets of parents demonstrated a stronger predictive power than the self-reported mindsets of parents. The underexplored role of parental mindsets is discussed concerning children’s achievement goal adoption and learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":51467,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142217480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The role of perceived ingroup norms about intergroup contact in intergroup friendship effects 感知到的内群体对群体间接触的规范在群体间友谊效应中的作用
IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI: 10.1007/s11218-024-09947-7
Lana Pehar, Dinka Čorkalo Biruški, Blaž Rebernjak

While intergroup contacts and social norms both have important roles in regulating intergroup relations, their effects on intergroup outcomes have mostly been examined independently from each other. The purpose of this longitudinal study was to explore the role of perceived ingroup norms about intergroup contact in the relationships between both direct and extended intergroup friendships and positive and negative outgroup orientations. To provide a more comprehensive normative perspective of intergroup contact, we tested for both cross-sectional and longitudinal, as well as moderation and mediation effects of perceived peer, parental, and school contact norms. The research was carried out in two waves on a sample of 1,128 majority and minority adolescents from four multiethnic communities in the Republic of Croatia. The results indicated that all three types of perceived ingroup contact norms exclusively mediate the cross-sectional, but not longitudinal, relationships between both forms of friendships and positive and negative outgroup orientations, highlighting the importance and consistency of perceived parental and school normative influences.

虽然群际接触和社会规范在调节群际关系方面都起着重要作用,但它们对群际结果的影响大多是独立研究的。本纵向研究的目的是探讨感知到的群体内群体间接触规范在群体间直接和扩展友谊与群体外积极和消极取向之间关系中的作用。为了提供更全面的群体间接触规范视角,我们测试了感知到的同伴、父母和学校接触规范的横向和纵向效应,以及调节和中介效应。研究分两波进行,样本是来自克罗地亚共和国四个多民族社区的 1128 名多数民族和少数民族青少年。研究结果表明,所有三种类型的感知到的内群体接触规范都对两种形式的友谊与积极和消极的外群体取向之间的横截面关系(而非纵截面关系)起到了中介作用,这凸显了感知到的父母和学校规范影响的重要性和一致性。
{"title":"The role of perceived ingroup norms about intergroup contact in intergroup friendship effects","authors":"Lana Pehar, Dinka Čorkalo Biruški, Blaž Rebernjak","doi":"10.1007/s11218-024-09947-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09947-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p>While intergroup contacts and social norms both have important roles in regulating intergroup relations, their effects on intergroup outcomes have mostly been examined independently from each other. The purpose of this longitudinal study was to explore the role of perceived ingroup norms about intergroup contact in the relationships between both direct and extended intergroup friendships and positive and negative outgroup orientations. To provide a more comprehensive normative perspective of intergroup contact, we tested for both cross-sectional and longitudinal, as well as moderation and mediation effects of perceived peer, parental, and school contact norms. The research was carried out in two waves on a sample of 1,128 majority and minority adolescents from four multiethnic communities in the Republic of Croatia. The results indicated that all three types of perceived ingroup contact norms exclusively mediate the cross-sectional, but not longitudinal, relationships between both forms of friendships and positive and negative outgroup orientations, highlighting the importance and consistency of perceived parental and school normative influences.</p>","PeriodicalId":51467,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142217470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How Universal Design for Learning (UDL) is related to Differentiated Instruction (DI): The mediation role of growth mindset and teachers’ practices factors 通用学习设计(UDL)与差异化教学(DI)的关系:成长心态和教师实践因素的中介作用
IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI: 10.1007/s11218-024-09945-9
Juan Cai, Qingyun Wen, Meijie Bi, Koen Lombaerts

Inclusive education, crucial for human rights and sustainable development, focuses on integrating and empowering students of varying needs and abilities. Understanding the interaction between Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and Differentiated Instruction (DI) is key for educators and stakeholders to implement inclusive strategies effectively. Yet, there is a significant gap in empirical research exploring this relationship. Therefore, this study examined a proposed model combining growth mindset and practice factors (ongoing assessment and flexible grouping), which explained how UDL is related to DI. Structural equation modeling was used to analyze data from 647 in-service teachers. The findings showed that practice factors independently and in combination with a growth mindset fully mediated the relationship between UDL and DI. The implications for the research community, teachers, and teacher educators to implement UDL and DI are presented.

全纳教育对人权和可持续发展至关重要,其重点是融合不同需求和能力的学 生,并增强他们的能力。了解 "通用学习设计"(UDL)与 "差异化教学"(DI)之间的相互作用,是教育工作者和相关人员有效实施全纳战略的关键。然而,在探索这种关系的实证研究方面还存在着巨大的差距。因此,本研究考察了一个结合了成长心态和实践因素(持续评估和灵活分组)的拟议模型,该模型解释了 UDL 与 DI 的关系。研究采用结构方程模型分析了 647 名在职教师的数据。研究结果表明,独立的实践因素以及与成长型思维相结合的实践因素完全调节了 UDL 与 DI 之间的关系。本文阐述了研究界、教师和教师教育工作者实施 UDL 和 DI 的意义。
{"title":"How Universal Design for Learning (UDL) is related to Differentiated Instruction (DI): The mediation role of growth mindset and teachers’ practices factors","authors":"Juan Cai, Qingyun Wen, Meijie Bi, Koen Lombaerts","doi":"10.1007/s11218-024-09945-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09945-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Inclusive education, crucial for human rights and sustainable development, focuses on integrating and empowering students of varying needs and abilities. Understanding the interaction between Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and Differentiated Instruction (DI) is key for educators and stakeholders to implement inclusive strategies effectively. Yet, there is a significant gap in empirical research exploring this relationship. Therefore, this study examined a proposed model combining growth mindset and practice factors (ongoing assessment and flexible grouping), which explained how UDL is related to DI. Structural equation modeling was used to analyze data from 647 in-service teachers. The findings showed that practice factors independently and in combination with a growth mindset fully mediated the relationship between UDL and DI. The implications for the research community, teachers, and teacher educators to implement UDL and DI are presented.</p>","PeriodicalId":51467,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142217467","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The mediation of organizational commitment between collective teacher efficacy and work engagement 组织承诺在教师集体效能感与工作投入之间的中介作用
IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI: 10.1007/s11218-024-09949-5
Behiye Dağdeviren Ertaş, Murat Özdemir

Attitudes and behaviors towards work enable teachers to perform organizational roles willingly in the educational process. Teachers who do their jobs with great enthusiasm, passion, and commitment are influential in increasing student success. For this reason, there is a need to investigate the individual and organizational factors that play a role in teachers’ work engagement. Previous research has shown that collective teacher efficacy is one of the critical factors that play a role in teachers’ work engagement. However, researchers need to sufficiently focus on the holistic effects of collective teacher efficacy, organizational commitment, and work engagement in teacher research. This research aims to investigate a newly developed model that explores the direct and indirect links among collective teacher efficacy, organizational commitment, and work engagement. The study involves 414 teachers working in state primary schools in 12 regions of Türkiye. A mediation analysis was conducted using structural equation modeling to assess the accuracy of the proposed model in this study. The results of the analysis demonstrate that organizational commitment is essential in mediating the relationship between collective teacher efficacy and work engagement. This study contributes significantly to the existing literature by offering valuable insights into the influence of collective teacher efficacy on work engagement among teachers in Türkiye. Specifically, it presents crucial findings regarding the impact of collective teacher efficacy on organizational commitment, highlighting the mediating role of this construct in the relationship between collective teacher efficacy and work engagement.

对工作的态度和行为使教师能够在教育过程中心甘情愿地发挥组织作用。教师以极大的热情、激情和奉献精神投入工作,对提高学生的成功率具有重要影响。因此,有必要研究影响教师工作投入的个人和组织因素。以往的研究表明,教师集体效能感是影响教师工作投入的关键因素之一。然而,在教师研究中,研究者需要充分关注教师集体效能感、组织承诺和工作投入的整体效应。本研究旨在研究一个新开发的模型,探讨教师集体效能感、组织承诺和工作投入之间的直接和间接联系。研究涉及土耳其 12 个地区公立小学的 414 名教师。本研究采用结构方程模型进行了中介分析,以评估所提出模型的准确性。分析结果表明,组织承诺在调解教师集体效能感与工作投入之间的关系方面至关重要。本研究就教师集体效能感对土耳其教师工作投入的影响提供了有价值的见解,为现有文献做出了重要贡献。具体而言,本研究提出了教师集体效能感对组织承诺影响的重要发现,强调了组织承诺在教师集体效能感与工作投入之间的中介作用。
{"title":"The mediation of organizational commitment between collective teacher efficacy and work engagement","authors":"Behiye Dağdeviren Ertaş, Murat Özdemir","doi":"10.1007/s11218-024-09949-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09949-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Attitudes and behaviors towards work enable teachers to perform organizational roles willingly in the educational process. Teachers who do their jobs with great enthusiasm, passion, and commitment are influential in increasing student success. For this reason, there is a need to investigate the individual and organizational factors that play a role in teachers’ work engagement. Previous research has shown that collective teacher efficacy is one of the critical factors that play a role in teachers’ work engagement. However, researchers need to sufficiently focus on the holistic effects of collective teacher efficacy, organizational commitment, and work engagement in teacher research. This research aims to investigate a newly developed model that explores the direct and indirect links among collective teacher efficacy, organizational commitment, and work engagement. The study involves 414 teachers working in state primary schools in 12 regions of Türkiye. A mediation analysis was conducted using structural equation modeling to assess the accuracy of the proposed model in this study. The results of the analysis demonstrate that organizational commitment is essential in mediating the relationship between collective teacher efficacy and work engagement. This study contributes significantly to the existing literature by offering valuable insights into the influence of collective teacher efficacy on work engagement among teachers in Türkiye. Specifically, it presents crucial findings regarding the impact of collective teacher efficacy on organizational commitment, highlighting the mediating role of this construct in the relationship between collective teacher efficacy and work engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":51467,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142217471","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Using RECAST theory to examine racial stress appraisal across high schools: Differences in racial threat and support 利用 RECAST 理论研究各高中的种族压力评估:种族威胁和支持的差异
IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI: 10.1007/s11218-024-09950-y
Maureen C. Fleming, Howard C. Stevenson, Emily Aisenbrey, Benedict T. McWhirter

Data from 318 diverse high school students from three different types of high schools in the United States were collected. School types varied by location (e.g., suburban, urban), size, and student demographics (e.g., race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status). Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was conducted to examine the factor structure of the STRESS-Y. Mean comparisons were performed to assess variations in Racial Stress Appraisal across different school types. The EFA of the STRESS-Y confirmed its factor structure, supporting its validity as a measure of RSA in youth and we were able to extract two robust factors—Racial Threat Appraisal and Racial Support Appraisal. Mean comparisons revealed that Racial Threat Appraisal and Racial Support Appraisal varied across different school types, highlighting the influence of school context on students' experiences of racial stress. This study provides evidence for the validity of the STRESS-Y as a measure of Racial Stress Appraisal in youth. The findings demonstrate the importance of considering school type as a factor influencing students' experiences of racial stress as well as how support, racial coping, and stress management skills may help mitigate ongoing interpersonal harm that youth are experiencing. The validated measure and the understanding of the factors contributing to Racial Stress Appraisal can inform interventions aimed at supporting students in managing and coping with racial stressors in their respective school environments.

我们收集了来自美国三种不同类型高中的 318 名不同高中学生的数据。学校类型因地理位置(如郊区、城市)、规模和学生人口统计(如种族、民族、社会经济地位)而异。对 STRESS-Y 进行了探索性因子分析(EFA),以检验其因子结构。为了评估种族压力评估在不同学校类型中的差异,还进行了均值比较。STRESS-Y 的 EFA 证实了其因子结构,支持其作为青少年种族压力评估指标的有效性,我们还提取了两个稳健的因子--种族威胁评估和种族支持评估。均值比较显示,种族威胁评估和种族支持评估在不同类型的学校中存在差异,这凸显了学校环境对学生种族压力体验的影响。本研究证明了 STRESS-Y 作为青少年种族压力评估测量方法的有效性。研究结果表明,将学校类型视为影响学生种族压力体验的一个因素非常重要,同时也说明了支持、种族应对和压力管理技能如何能够帮助减轻青少年正在经历的持续的人际伤害。经过验证的测量方法以及对造成种族压力评估的因素的了解,可以为旨在支持学生管理和应对各自学校环境中的种族压力的干预措施提供信息。
{"title":"Using RECAST theory to examine racial stress appraisal across high schools: Differences in racial threat and support","authors":"Maureen C. Fleming, Howard C. Stevenson, Emily Aisenbrey, Benedict T. McWhirter","doi":"10.1007/s11218-024-09950-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09950-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Data from 318 diverse high school students from three different types of high schools in the United States were collected. School types varied by location (e.g., suburban, urban), size, and student demographics (e.g., race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status). Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was conducted to examine the factor structure of the STRESS-Y. Mean comparisons were performed to assess variations in Racial Stress Appraisal across different school types. The EFA of the STRESS-Y confirmed its factor structure, supporting its validity as a measure of RSA in youth and we were able to extract two robust factors—Racial Threat Appraisal and Racial Support Appraisal. Mean comparisons revealed that Racial Threat Appraisal and Racial Support Appraisal varied across different school types, highlighting the influence of school context on students' experiences of racial stress. This study provides evidence for the validity of the STRESS-Y as a measure of Racial Stress Appraisal in youth. The findings demonstrate the importance of considering school type as a factor influencing students' experiences of racial stress as well as how support, racial coping, and stress management skills may help mitigate ongoing interpersonal harm that youth are experiencing. The validated measure and the understanding of the factors contributing to Racial Stress Appraisal can inform interventions aimed at supporting students in managing and coping with racial stressors in their respective school environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":51467,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142217472","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Social Psychology of Education
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1