{"title":"Independent self-concept promotes group creativity in a collectivistic cultural context only when the group norm supports collectivism.","authors":"Hayeon Lee, Hoon-Seok Choi","doi":"10.1037/gdn0000129","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000129","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51499,"journal":{"name":"Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86620889","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"“The game of bullying”: Shared beliefs and behavioral labels in bullying among middle schoolers.","authors":"Małgorzata Wójcik, M. Mondry","doi":"10.1037/gdn0000125","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000125","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51499,"journal":{"name":"Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice","volume":"21 1","pages":"276-293"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72912643","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
P. Hoffmann, M. Platow, Emily Read, T. Mansfield, Bradley Carron-Arthur, Marion Stanton
{"title":"Perceived self-in-group prototypicality enhances the benefits of social identification for psychological well-being.","authors":"P. Hoffmann, M. Platow, Emily Read, T. Mansfield, Bradley Carron-Arthur, Marion Stanton","doi":"10.1037/gdn0000119","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000119","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51499,"journal":{"name":"Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice","volume":"21 1","pages":"213-226"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81989606","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cameron Alldredge, G. Burlingame, J. Olsen, Jake Van Epps
{"title":"Outcome Questionnaire-45 (OQ-45) progress alert rates in group versus individual treatment: An archival replication.","authors":"Cameron Alldredge, G. Burlingame, J. Olsen, Jake Van Epps","doi":"10.1037/gdn0000121","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000121","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51499,"journal":{"name":"Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice","volume":"25 1","pages":"247-260"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81783102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"What was that session like? An empirically-derived typology of group therapy sessions.","authors":"Xu Li, D. Kivlighan, Jill D. Paquin, P. B. Gold","doi":"10.1037/gdn0000139","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000139","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51499,"journal":{"name":"Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2020-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77030593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
M. Cavicchioli, Giulia Vassena, Pietro Ramella, Giulia Simone, M. Movalli, C. Maffei
{"title":"Group relationships during a dialectical behavior therapy skills training program for the treatment of alcohol and concurrent substance use disorders: Evidence and theoretical considerations.","authors":"M. Cavicchioli, Giulia Vassena, Pietro Ramella, Giulia Simone, M. Movalli, C. Maffei","doi":"10.1037/gdn0000138","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000138","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51499,"journal":{"name":"Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice","volume":"13 6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2020-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85593210","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: This special issue of Group Dynamics presents six articles that address aspects of how group dynamics and processes have been impacted by, and have the potential to impact, the SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19 pandemic Method: This introduction briefly reviews and comments on each article Results: The articles highlight a number of issues and findings: the natural inclination of people to congregate in groups both exacerbate the spread of the virus and can provide solace during these times of stress;the concept of groupthink may explain the seemingly irrational rejection of public health measures among some in society;group psychotherapy is effective, but we need more research to understand how it works when delivered in an online format as necessitated by the current pandemic;an emotional management intervention might help virtual work groups to perform better;how members perceive their virtual environment could affect the quality of their groupwork;and today's virtual work environments requires group members to have a common understanding of the technologies they are using Conclusions: The current crisis has highlighted that groups to which we belong are important to our mental health and productivity The pandemic also has made clear the need for a broader scholarly and professional investment in the understanding and use of groups Such an investment would not only move the fields of group research forward, but would also inform public health policy, and ease our adjustment to and capacity to flourish in the current and future pandemics (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved) Impact Statement Highlights and Implications-*The COVID-19 health crisis has shown us how central groups are to daily living Unfortunately, there are many aspects of group functioning that we do not understand very well, but which the pandemic has shown are critical *This special issue of Group Dynamics reviews a select few of these aspects *In particular, the papers address the virtual group experience and what we know about how it compares to the in-person experience;provision of virtual group psychotherapy;how social distancing is necessary for physical health but problematic for emotional health;and how groupthink can explain some of the surprising behaviors that we have seen during the COVID-19 crisis (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)
{"title":"Group dynamics when battling a pandemic.","authors":"C. Parks","doi":"10.1037/gdn0000143","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000143","url":null,"abstract":"Background: This special issue of Group Dynamics presents six articles that address aspects of how group dynamics and processes have been impacted by, and have the potential to impact, the SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19 pandemic Method: This introduction briefly reviews and comments on each article Results: The articles highlight a number of issues and findings: the natural inclination of people to congregate in groups both exacerbate the spread of the virus and can provide solace during these times of stress;the concept of groupthink may explain the seemingly irrational rejection of public health measures among some in society;group psychotherapy is effective, but we need more research to understand how it works when delivered in an online format as necessitated by the current pandemic;an emotional management intervention might help virtual work groups to perform better;how members perceive their virtual environment could affect the quality of their groupwork;and today's virtual work environments requires group members to have a common understanding of the technologies they are using Conclusions: The current crisis has highlighted that groups to which we belong are important to our mental health and productivity The pandemic also has made clear the need for a broader scholarly and professional investment in the understanding and use of groups Such an investment would not only move the fields of group research forward, but would also inform public health policy, and ease our adjustment to and capacity to flourish in the current and future pandemics (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved) Impact Statement Highlights and Implications-*The COVID-19 health crisis has shown us how central groups are to daily living Unfortunately, there are many aspects of group functioning that we do not understand very well, but which the pandemic has shown are critical *This special issue of Group Dynamics reviews a select few of these aspects *In particular, the papers address the virtual group experience and what we know about how it compares to the in-person experience;provision of virtual group psychotherapy;how social distancing is necessary for physical health but problematic for emotional health;and how groupthink can explain some of the surprising behaviors that we have seen during the COVID-19 crisis (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)","PeriodicalId":51499,"journal":{"name":"Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice","volume":"201202 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77695548","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
C. Marmarosh, D. Forsyth, B. Strauss, G. Burlingame
Objective: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) threatened not only people's physical health but also every aspect of their psychological well-being: from their struggle to avoid contracting the disease, to their coping with the disruption of the normal course of their lives, to the trauma they endured when the virus took the lives of those they loved The objective of this article is to consider the group-level processes that sustain people's physical and psychological well-being during COVID-19 Method: Applying group dynamic and group therapy theory and research, we explore why COVID-19 spread so rapidly We also explore how people cope with prolonged social isolation, distress, and social inequities, as well as how people deal with the psychological trauma of the disease, which includes heightened levels of depression, anxiety, substance abuse, and complicated bereavement Results: Researchers and theorists suggest that human beings are fundamentally social, and the need to gather with others is extremely important, especially during times of distress The need to belong as well as the importance of reducing loneliness during uncertain times often encourages people to connect, despite recommendations to remain socially distant Conclusions: Group treatment options developed by group psychotherapists are effective at reducing depression, anxiety, complicated grief, and stress We conclude by examining the growing impact of online groups and the many ways that these groups help people improve their psychological well-being during the COVID-19 crisis (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved) Impact Statement Highlights and Implications-*Group dynamic theorists and researchers provide important contributions to the understanding of the prevention of COVID-19 Group dynamics explain why some people perceive less of a threat and why some people refuse to wear face masks or social distance *Group psychotherapy researchers and practitioners describe the importance of group leadership, group cohesion, and the effects of loneliness and social isolation on people coping with COVID-19 *Given the mental and physical health challenges we face with COVID-19, online group and group therapy interventions are becoming more prevalent The importance of future studies examining the effectiveness of online groups (both support and therapy) are necessary We also need studies that examine what individual difference variables influence the effectiveness of online group interventions, such as age, race, class, ethnicity, culture, attachment style, and level of isolation *One of the main implications of this article is that it is critical to examine the group-level factors that influence how we navigate a pandemic Groups influence how we prevent the transmission of COVID-19, how we sustain ourselves during periods of social isolation, and how we address the effects of complicated bereavement, trauma, illness, social inequities, unemployment, anxiety, and depre
目的:新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)不仅威胁着人们的身体健康，而且威胁着人们心理健康的方方面面。从他们努力避免感染疾病，到他们应对正常生活中断，再到他们在病毒夺去亲人生命时所承受的创伤。本文的目的是考虑在COVID-19期间维持人们身心健康的群体层面过程。运用群体动态和群体治疗理论和研究，我们探讨了COVID-19传播如此迅速的原因。我们还探讨了人们如何应对长期的社会孤立、痛苦和社会不平等，以及人们如何应对疾病带来的心理创伤，包括抑郁、焦虑、药物滥用和复杂的丧亲之痛。研究人员和理论家认为，人类本质上是社会性的，与他人聚集的需求极其重要，尤其是在痛苦时期。归属感的需求以及在不确定时期减少孤独感的重要性往往鼓励人们联系，尽管建议保持社交距离。由团体心理治疗师开发的团体治疗方案可有效减少抑郁、焦虑、复杂的悲伤和压力。最后，我们研究了在线团体日益增长的影响，以及这些团体在2019冠状病毒病危机期间帮助人们改善心理健康的多种方式(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2020 APA，影响声明重点和含义-*群体动力学理论家和研究人员为理解COVID-19的预防提供了重要贡献。群体动力学解释了为什么有些人对威胁的感知较少，为什么有些人拒绝戴口罩或社交距离。*团体心理治疗研究人员和从业者描述了团体领导、团体凝聚力、*鉴于我们面临的COVID-19心理和身体健康挑战，在线团体和团体治疗干预措施正变得越来越普遍，未来研究在线团体(支持和治疗)有效性的重要性是必要的。我们还需要研究影响在线团体干预措施有效性的个体差异变量，如年龄、种族、*本文的主要含义之一是，研究影响我们如何应对大流行的群体层面因素至关重要群体影响我们如何预防COVID-19的传播，我们如何在社会隔离期间维持自己，以及我们如何应对复杂的丧亲之痛、创伤、疾病、社会不平等、失业、焦虑、(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA，版权所有)
{"title":"The psychology of the COVID-19 pandemic: A group-level perspective.","authors":"C. Marmarosh, D. Forsyth, B. Strauss, G. Burlingame","doi":"10.1037/gdn0000142","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000142","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) threatened not only people's physical health but also every aspect of their psychological well-being: from their struggle to avoid contracting the disease, to their coping with the disruption of the normal course of their lives, to the trauma they endured when the virus took the lives of those they loved The objective of this article is to consider the group-level processes that sustain people's physical and psychological well-being during COVID-19 Method: Applying group dynamic and group therapy theory and research, we explore why COVID-19 spread so rapidly We also explore how people cope with prolonged social isolation, distress, and social inequities, as well as how people deal with the psychological trauma of the disease, which includes heightened levels of depression, anxiety, substance abuse, and complicated bereavement Results: Researchers and theorists suggest that human beings are fundamentally social, and the need to gather with others is extremely important, especially during times of distress The need to belong as well as the importance of reducing loneliness during uncertain times often encourages people to connect, despite recommendations to remain socially distant Conclusions: Group treatment options developed by group psychotherapists are effective at reducing depression, anxiety, complicated grief, and stress We conclude by examining the growing impact of online groups and the many ways that these groups help people improve their psychological well-being during the COVID-19 crisis (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved) Impact Statement Highlights and Implications-*Group dynamic theorists and researchers provide important contributions to the understanding of the prevention of COVID-19 Group dynamics explain why some people perceive less of a threat and why some people refuse to wear face masks or social distance *Group psychotherapy researchers and practitioners describe the importance of group leadership, group cohesion, and the effects of loneliness and social isolation on people coping with COVID-19 *Given the mental and physical health challenges we face with COVID-19, online group and group therapy interventions are becoming more prevalent The importance of future studies examining the effectiveness of online groups (both support and therapy) are necessary We also need studies that examine what individual difference variables influence the effectiveness of online group interventions, such as age, race, class, ethnicity, culture, attachment style, and level of isolation *One of the main implications of this article is that it is critical to examine the group-level factors that influence how we navigate a pandemic Groups influence how we prevent the transmission of COVID-19, how we sustain ourselves during periods of social isolation, and how we address the effects of complicated bereavement, trauma, illness, social inequities, unemployment, anxiety, and depre","PeriodicalId":51499,"journal":{"name":"Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice","volume":"14 2 1","pages":"122-138"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77498553","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
K. Holtz, Virginia Orengo Castella, Ana Zornoza Abad, Baltasar González-Anta
{"title":"Virtual team functioning: Modeling the affective and cognitive effects of an emotional management intervention.","authors":"K. Holtz, Virginia Orengo Castella, Ana Zornoza Abad, Baltasar González-Anta","doi":"10.1037/gdn0000141","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000141","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51499,"journal":{"name":"Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice","volume":"145 1","pages":"153-167"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75071891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Online group therapy is a relatively new modality for leading groups There is not enough research yet to evaluate its effectiveness and no clear guidelines about how to do it well With the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic it became even more crucial to provide clinicians with appropriate research review and practical guidelines The purpose of this article was to provide practice recommendations based on or despite the limited research Method: The article reviewed research on online therapy in general, including any on groups, followed by a summary of the obstacles in leading groups online and recommendations for creative solutions Findings: Research on online groups is still scarce, and its quality still has many limitations Discussion: More research is needed, especially on specific elements in online group therapy, such as the establishing of cohesion and therapeutic presence online, as well as how different the working alliance and cohesion are created online when compared to face-to-face groups Despite limited research, the author recommends being more active and increasing self-disclosure in online groups to compensate for the challenge of being present and the lack of body-to-body interaction Training for online group therapy is necessary (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved) Impact Statement Highlights and Implications-*Two of the ingredients of the therapeutic alliance, agreeing on the goals and tasks, can easily be achieved in online groups The third one, the quality of relationship, is still questionable *The absence of body-to-body interaction in online groups may be considered the main obstacle in shifting from the circle to the screen The absence of eye contact is especially relevant for group therapists *Presence is difficult to achieve through screen relations There are too many distractions Increasing the group therapist's self-disclosure and encouraging group members to use their imagination may be of help *Moving from in-person to online group therapy requires knowledge and training, just as when moving from individual therapy to group therapy (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)
{"title":"Online group psychotherapy: Challenges and possibilities during COVID-19—A practice review.","authors":"H. Weinberg","doi":"10.1037/gdn0000140","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000140","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Online group therapy is a relatively new modality for leading groups There is not enough research yet to evaluate its effectiveness and no clear guidelines about how to do it well With the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic it became even more crucial to provide clinicians with appropriate research review and practical guidelines The purpose of this article was to provide practice recommendations based on or despite the limited research Method: The article reviewed research on online therapy in general, including any on groups, followed by a summary of the obstacles in leading groups online and recommendations for creative solutions Findings: Research on online groups is still scarce, and its quality still has many limitations Discussion: More research is needed, especially on specific elements in online group therapy, such as the establishing of cohesion and therapeutic presence online, as well as how different the working alliance and cohesion are created online when compared to face-to-face groups Despite limited research, the author recommends being more active and increasing self-disclosure in online groups to compensate for the challenge of being present and the lack of body-to-body interaction Training for online group therapy is necessary (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved) Impact Statement Highlights and Implications-*Two of the ingredients of the therapeutic alliance, agreeing on the goals and tasks, can easily be achieved in online groups The third one, the quality of relationship, is still questionable *The absence of body-to-body interaction in online groups may be considered the main obstacle in shifting from the circle to the screen The absence of eye contact is especially relevant for group therapists *Presence is difficult to achieve through screen relations There are too many distractions Increasing the group therapist's self-disclosure and encouraging group members to use their imagination may be of help *Moving from in-person to online group therapy requires knowledge and training, just as when moving from individual therapy to group therapy (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)","PeriodicalId":51499,"journal":{"name":"Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73256994","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：