Public health interventions, such as mandated vaccinating or quarantining during an epidemic, are necessary to limit the spread of communicable diseases, but in many cases, certain groups resist these initiatives For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020, antiquarantine groups protested the mandate to socially distance and remain at home, claiming these directives violated their right to assemble, travel, and work The current analysis examined media descriptions of these antiquarantine groups to determine if these groups' divergent responses to a legally and medically warranted health initiative resulted from groupthink: the deterioration of judgment and rationality that sometimes occurs in groups In support of this possibility, accounts of these groups indicated that (a) the conditions that cause groupthink, including high levels of cohesion and isolation, were present and potent within these groups and that (b) the groups exhibited many of the symptoms of groupthink, including group illusions and pressures to conform Given the ubiquity of these groups-for centuries, public health interventions have generated opposing antiregulation reactions-no amount of planning may be sufficient to prevent such groups However, a theory-driven approach based on groupthink suggests that group-level interventions that directly address the processes that cause groupthink, such as isolation, conformity pressure, and cohesion, could reduce the influence of such groups on their members and on society (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved) Impact Statement Highlights and Implications-*Groups that protest public health interventions that mandate vaccinating or quarantining during an epidemic may be experiencing groupthink: the deterioration of judgment and rationality that sometimes occurs in highly cohesive groups *The group-level processes that are associated with groupthink, such as high levels of cohesion and isolation, were in evidence in the antiquarantine groups that protested medical directives during the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020 *Group-level interventions that limit groupthink in such groups could reduce the number of individuals who take part in group activities that are inconsistent with legally and medically warranted health initiatives *Groupthink theory provides a general explanation for decision-making in groups, but additional research is needed to determine the validity of the extension of this theory to groups that engage in unusual actions, such as health protests (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)
公共卫生干预措施，如在流行病期间强制接种疫苗或隔离，对于限制传染病的传播是必要的，但在许多情况下，某些群体抵制这些举措。例如，在2020年2019冠状病毒病大流行期间，反隔离团体抗议要求保持社交距离并留在家中的规定，声称这些指令侵犯了他们的集会、旅行、当前的分析检查了媒体对这些反检疫群体的描述，以确定这些群体对法律和医学上有保证的健康倡议的不同反应是否源于群体思维:为了支持这种可能性，对这些群体的描述表明:(a)导致群体思维的条件，包括高度的凝聚力和孤立性，在这些群体中是存在的，而且是强有力的;(b)这些群体表现出了群体思维的许多症状，包括群体幻想和顺从的压力。然而，基于群体思维的理论驱动方法表明，直接解决导致群体思维的过程(如孤立、从众压力和凝聚力)的群体层面干预可以减少此类群体对其成员和社会的影响(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA)，影响声明重点和影响-*抗议在流行病期间强制接种疫苗或隔离的公共卫生干预措施的团体可能正在经历群体思维:与群体思维相关的群体层面的过程，如高度的凝聚力和孤立性;在2020年COVID-19大流行期间抗议医疗指令的反检疫团体中得到了证据*限制群体思维的群体层面干预措施可以减少参与与法律和医学上有根据的健康举措不一致的群体活动的个人数量*群体思维理论为群体决策提供了一般解释，但需要进一步的研究来确定将这一理论扩展到从事不寻常行为的群体(如健康抗议)的有效性(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2020 APA，所有权利保留)
{"title":"Group-level resistance to health mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic: A groupthink approach.","authors":"D. Forsyth","doi":"10.1037/gdn0000132","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000132","url":null,"abstract":"Public health interventions, such as mandated vaccinating or quarantining during an epidemic, are necessary to limit the spread of communicable diseases, but in many cases, certain groups resist these initiatives For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020, antiquarantine groups protested the mandate to socially distance and remain at home, claiming these directives violated their right to assemble, travel, and work The current analysis examined media descriptions of these antiquarantine groups to determine if these groups' divergent responses to a legally and medically warranted health initiative resulted from groupthink: the deterioration of judgment and rationality that sometimes occurs in groups In support of this possibility, accounts of these groups indicated that (a) the conditions that cause groupthink, including high levels of cohesion and isolation, were present and potent within these groups and that (b) the groups exhibited many of the symptoms of groupthink, including group illusions and pressures to conform Given the ubiquity of these groups-for centuries, public health interventions have generated opposing antiregulation reactions-no amount of planning may be sufficient to prevent such groups However, a theory-driven approach based on groupthink suggests that group-level interventions that directly address the processes that cause groupthink, such as isolation, conformity pressure, and cohesion, could reduce the influence of such groups on their members and on society (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved) Impact Statement Highlights and Implications-*Groups that protest public health interventions that mandate vaccinating or quarantining during an epidemic may be experiencing groupthink: the deterioration of judgment and rationality that sometimes occurs in highly cohesive groups *The group-level processes that are associated with groupthink, such as high levels of cohesion and isolation, were in evidence in the antiquarantine groups that protested medical directives during the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020 *Group-level interventions that limit groupthink in such groups could reduce the number of individuals who take part in group activities that are inconsistent with legally and medically warranted health initiatives *Groupthink theory provides a general explanation for decision-making in groups, but additional research is needed to determine the validity of the extension of this theory to groups that engage in unusual actions, such as health protests (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)","PeriodicalId":51499,"journal":{"name":"Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice","volume":"14 1","pages":"139"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2020-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87737725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Individual perceptions of shared mental models of information and communication technology (ICT) and virtual team coordination and performance—The moderating role of flexibility in ICT use.","authors":"Rebecca Müller, C. Antoni","doi":"10.1037/gdn0000130","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000130","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51499,"journal":{"name":"Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2020-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90540743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Examining the prospective relationship between communication network structure and task cohesion and team performance.","authors":"Colin D. McLaren, K. Spink","doi":"10.1037/gdn0000110","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000110","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51499,"journal":{"name":"Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice","volume":"13 1","pages":"74-87"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77454852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Group dominance in hierarchy-attenuating and hierarchy-enhancing organizations: The role of social dominance orientation, need for cognitive closure, and power tactics in a person–environment (mis)fit perspective.","authors":"A. Tesi, F. Pratto, Antonio Pierro, A. Aiello","doi":"10.1037/gdn0000117","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000117","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51499,"journal":{"name":"Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice","volume":"175 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73288194","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The current study examines the asymmetric effects of dyadic gender composition on the provision of task-related helping behaviors in project teams. We collected 428 observations of dyadic task-related helping behaviors from 149 students in 31 project teams. We tested our hypotheses using a multilevel cross-classified model in which each member interacts with all other members of the project team. The findings indicate an asymmetric pattern of the effects of dyadic gender composition on task-related help contingent on members’ perceived expertise and team identification. The results show that women are more likely to provide task-related help to men peers when women’s perceived expertise is high. Additionally, men are likely to provide task-related assistance to women peers when the men’s team identification is high. The pattern of interactions of perceived expertise and team identification with dyadic gender composition found in the present study suggests that the dyadic gender composition plays out in a more complex way than previously considered, especially due to the status implications of gender. It is important for managers to understand how dyadic gender composition could encourage or discourage an offering of task-related help.
{"title":"The interactive effects of perceived expertise, team identification, and dyadic gender composition on task-related helping behavior in project teams.","authors":"Woonki Hong, Eun Kyung Lee, Jooyeon Son","doi":"10.1037/gdn0000116","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000116","url":null,"abstract":"The current study examines the asymmetric effects of dyadic gender composition on the provision of task-related helping behaviors in project teams. We collected 428 observations of dyadic task-related helping behaviors from 149 students in 31 project teams. We tested our hypotheses using a multilevel cross-classified model in which each member interacts with all other members of the project team. The findings indicate an asymmetric pattern of the effects of dyadic gender composition on task-related help contingent on members’ perceived expertise and team identification. The results show that women are more likely to provide task-related help to men peers when women’s perceived expertise is high. Additionally, men are likely to provide task-related assistance to women peers when the men’s team identification is high. The pattern of interactions of perceived expertise and team identification with dyadic gender composition found in the present study suggests that the dyadic gender composition plays out in a more complex way than previously considered, especially due to the status implications of gender. It is important for managers to understand how dyadic gender composition could encourage or discourage an offering of task-related help.","PeriodicalId":51499,"journal":{"name":"Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice","volume":"187 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74962479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Social influences on cheating in collectivistic culture: Collaboration but not competition.","authors":"S. F. Jamaluddin, S. Adi, Galang Lufityanto","doi":"10.1037/gdn0000122","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000122","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51499,"journal":{"name":"Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2020-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87002846","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Supplemental Material for Social Influences on Cheating in Collectivistic Culture: Collaboration but Not Competition","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/gdn0000122.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000122.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51499,"journal":{"name":"Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice","volume":"122 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2020-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78446148","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Krista M. Chronister, Deanna Linville, Kayla Vargas, Fallon Baraga
{"title":"Critical consciousness development in a group intervention context: Examining clinician and participant verbalizations.","authors":"Krista M. Chronister, Deanna Linville, Kayla Vargas, Fallon Baraga","doi":"10.1037/gdn0000118","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000118","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51499,"journal":{"name":"Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice","volume":"134 1","pages":"227-246"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87310083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Matthew I. Brown, Matthew S. Prewett, M. Grossenbacher
{"title":"Distancing ourselves from geographic dispersion: An examination of perceived virtuality in teams.","authors":"Matthew I. Brown, Matthew S. Prewett, M. Grossenbacher","doi":"10.1037/gdn0000120","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000120","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51499,"journal":{"name":"Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75030292","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"From hierarchical to egalitarian: Hierarchy steepness depends on speaking time feedback and task interdependence.","authors":"Mahshid Khademi, M. S. Mast, Denise Frauendorfer","doi":"10.1037/gdn0000114","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000114","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51499,"journal":{"name":"Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice","volume":"357 1","pages":"261-275"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2020-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76513982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：