首页 > 最新文献

Family Court Review最新文献

英文 中文
Agreements to waive paternity 放弃亲子关系的协议
IF 0.6 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES Pub Date : 2025-10-10 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.70027
Shahar Lifshitz

This article examines the legal and ethical status of agreements to waive paternity in cases of unintended pregnancies and contrasts them with legal regimes governing anonymous and known sperm donations. Although these scenarios often result in the same functional outcome—severance of the biological father's legal relationship with the child—they are treated inconsistently by legal systems. The article critiques prevailing approaches grounded in contract, the best interests of the child (BIRC), and the right to parenthood, and demonstrates their analytical and policy limitations. As an alternative, the article proposes a novel framework based on a social-institutional conception of parenthood. This framework emphasizes the ethics of parenting and the need to distinguish legally between “parents” and “donors” as separate institutional roles. It supports prohibiting paternity waivers while justifying sperm donation—under carefully regulated conditions—as a legitimate social institution. The article offers policy guidelines for regulating sperm donations, particularly those involving known donors, and calls for coherent legal categories aligned with ethical and institutional principles of parenting.

本文探讨了在意外怀孕的情况下放弃父亲身份的协议的法律和伦理地位,并将其与管理匿名和已知精子捐赠的法律制度进行了对比。尽管这些情况通常会导致相同的功能结果——生父与孩子的法律关系破裂——但法律体系对这些情况的处理却不一致。本文批评了以契约、儿童最大利益(BIRC)和亲子权为基础的流行方法,并论证了它们在分析和政策上的局限性。作为一种替代方案,本文提出了一个基于社会制度的亲子概念的新框架。这一框架强调养育子女的道德规范以及在法律上区分“父母”和“捐助者”作为不同机构角色的必要性。它支持禁止放弃父权,同时在谨慎监管的条件下,将精子捐赠作为一种合法的社会制度。这篇文章提供了规范精子捐赠的政策指导方针,特别是那些涉及已知捐赠者的精子捐赠,并呼吁建立与养育子女的伦理和制度原则相一致的法律类别。
{"title":"Agreements to waive paternity","authors":"Shahar Lifshitz","doi":"10.1111/fcre.70027","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.70027","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article examines the legal and ethical status of agreements to waive paternity in cases of unintended pregnancies and contrasts them with legal regimes governing anonymous and known sperm donations. Although these scenarios often result in the same functional outcome—severance of the biological father's legal relationship with the child—they are treated inconsistently by legal systems. The article critiques prevailing approaches grounded in contract, the best interests of the child (BIRC), and the right to parenthood, and demonstrates their analytical and policy limitations. As an alternative, the article proposes a novel framework based on a social-institutional conception of parenthood. This framework emphasizes the ethics of parenting and the need to distinguish legally between “parents” and “donors” as separate institutional roles. It supports prohibiting paternity waivers while justifying sperm donation—under carefully regulated conditions—as a legitimate social institution. The article offers policy guidelines for regulating sperm donations, particularly those involving known donors, and calls for coherent legal categories aligned with ethical and institutional principles of parenting.</p>","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"63 4","pages":"766-787"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fcre.70027","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145449870","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Benchmarking age-gates 基准测试age-gates
IF 0.6 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES Pub Date : 2025-10-10 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.70015
Katharine Silbaugh

This article examines how legal actors—particularly legislators, judges, and attorneys—invoke chronological age to justify the application of legal rules to adolescents. In doing so, they often rely on comparisons to existing “age-gates,” treating these thresholds (such as ages 18 or 21) as self-justifying reference points. Age 18, marking the legal transition from childhood to adulthood, and age 21, the former age of majority and current sales age for certain controlled substances, serve as especially powerful rhetorical anchors in age-based legal reasoning. These anchor points shape how legal actors advocate for or against particular age thresholds, often substituting analogy for substantive justification. This article argues that the rhetorical force of anchor age-gates is difficult to avoid, and therefore age-gates in one area are likely to influence decisions about other age-gates in other areas. Legal actors should recognize the influence of benchmarking arguments and cannot avoid responsibility for the risk that their advocacy in one context will be misused in another. At the same time, legal actors should resist treating age-gates as inherently dispositive. Instead, decision-makers should supplement age-based comparisons with principled reasoning grounded in the purposes and effects of the legal rule at issue. The article concludes by exploring the status-transforming quality of legal marriage and its implications for determining the appropriate age of legal consent to marry.

本文考察了法律行为者——特别是立法者、法官和律师——如何援引实际年龄来证明对青少年适用法律规则的合理性。在这样做的过程中,他们经常依赖于与现有的“年龄门”的比较,将这些阈值(例如18岁或21岁)视为自我证明的参考点。18岁,标志着从童年到成年的合法过渡,21岁,之前的成年年龄和目前某些受控物质的销售年龄,是基于年龄的法律推理中特别有力的修辞锚。这些锚点塑造了法律行为者支持或反对特定年龄门槛的方式,经常用类比代替实质性理由。本文认为,锚年龄门的修辞力量是难以避免的,因此,一个地区的年龄门可能会影响其他地区关于其他年龄门的决定。法律行为者应认识到基准论证的影响,并且不能逃避其在一种情况下的主张在另一种情况下被滥用的风险的责任。与此同时,法律行为者应抵制将年龄门槛视为固有的决定性因素。相反,决策者应该用基于相关法律规则的目的和效果的原则推理来补充基于年龄的比较。文章最后探讨了合法婚姻的地位转换性质及其对确定合法同意结婚的适当年龄的影响。
{"title":"Benchmarking age-gates","authors":"Katharine Silbaugh","doi":"10.1111/fcre.70015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.70015","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article examines how legal actors—particularly legislators, judges, and attorneys—invoke chronological age to justify the application of legal rules to adolescents. In doing so, they often rely on comparisons to existing “age-gates,” treating these thresholds (such as ages 18 or 21) as self-justifying reference points. Age 18, marking the legal transition from childhood to adulthood, and age 21, the former age of majority and current sales age for certain controlled substances, serve as especially powerful rhetorical anchors in age-based legal reasoning. These anchor points shape how legal actors advocate for or against particular age thresholds, often substituting analogy for substantive justification. This article argues that the rhetorical force of anchor age-gates is difficult to avoid, and therefore age-gates in one area are likely to influence decisions about other age-gates in other areas. Legal actors should recognize the influence of benchmarking arguments and cannot avoid responsibility for the risk that their advocacy in one context will be misused in another. At the same time, legal actors should resist treating age-gates as inherently dispositive. Instead, decision-makers should supplement age-based comparisons with principled reasoning grounded in the purposes and effects of the legal rule at issue. The article concludes by exploring the status-transforming quality of legal marriage and its implications for determining the appropriate age of legal consent to marry.</p>","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"63 4","pages":"788-807"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145449869","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Making it work: Custodial caregiver experiences with third-party supervised visitation 使其有效:第三方监督探视的监护护理员经验
IF 0.6 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES Pub Date : 2025-10-10 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.70031
Jeanelle S. Sears, Jordan Wilfong, Paige Olah

Supervised parenting, commonly referred to as supervised visitation, is a growing service with limited research examining its impact on families. Compared with research on non-custodial parents, less is known about how custodial caregivers navigate this service to support their children both before and after supervised time with non-custodial parents. This is of particular importance given common histories of high conflict and often violence among those participating in these services. This qualitative study involved conducting individual semi-structured interviews with caregivers to understand their perspectives on the impact of supervised parenting time for both them and the children in their custody. The findings reveal the complexity of third-party supervised parenting arrangements, which require significant effort for custodial caregivers to manage. Custodians initially faced apprehensions and struggled to maintain stability and normalcy for their children amidst intrusive schedules and systemic frustrations. While some participants achieved peace of mind, others faced ongoing challenges due to inconsistent practices and communication from the service providers. Overall, the essence of participant experiences was one of simply making it work, driven by a steadfast commitment to their children's stability and normality. Implications include the need to establish research-supported best practices and guidelines that further acknowledge and incorporate family and community diversity.

有监督的育儿,通常被称为有监督的探视,是一项日益发展的服务,关于其对家庭影响的研究有限。与对非监护父母的研究相比,对监护照顾者如何在与非监护父母监督时间之前和之后利用这项服务来支持他们的孩子的了解较少。鉴于参与这些服务的人都有高度冲突和经常发生暴力的共同历史,这一点尤为重要。这项定性研究包括对看护人进行个人半结构化访谈,以了解他们对监督育儿时间对他们和他们监护的孩子的影响的看法。研究结果揭示了第三方监督的养育安排的复杂性,这需要监护者付出巨大的努力来管理。监护人最初面临着担忧,并在干扰的时间表和系统挫折中努力维持孩子的稳定和正常。虽然一些参与者获得了内心的平静,但由于服务提供者的做法和沟通不一致,其他参与者面临着持续的挑战。总的来说,参与者体验的本质是简单地让它工作,由对孩子的稳定和正常的坚定承诺驱动。其影响包括需要建立研究支持的最佳做法和准则,进一步承认和纳入家庭和社区的多样性。
{"title":"Making it work: Custodial caregiver experiences with third-party supervised visitation","authors":"Jeanelle S. Sears,&nbsp;Jordan Wilfong,&nbsp;Paige Olah","doi":"10.1111/fcre.70031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.70031","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Supervised parenting, commonly referred to as supervised visitation, is a growing service with limited research examining its impact on families. Compared with research on non-custodial parents, less is known about how custodial caregivers navigate this service to support their children both before and after supervised time with non-custodial parents. This is of particular importance given common histories of high conflict and often violence among those participating in these services. This qualitative study involved conducting individual semi-structured interviews with caregivers to understand their perspectives on the impact of supervised parenting time for both them and the children in their custody. The findings reveal the complexity of third-party supervised parenting arrangements, which require significant effort for custodial caregivers to manage. Custodians initially faced apprehensions and struggled to maintain stability and normalcy for their children amidst intrusive schedules and systemic frustrations. While some participants achieved peace of mind, others faced ongoing challenges due to inconsistent practices and communication from the service providers. Overall, the essence of participant experiences was one of simply <i>making it work</i>, driven by a steadfast commitment to their children's stability and normality. Implications include the need to establish research-supported best practices and guidelines that further acknowledge and incorporate family and community diversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"63 4","pages":"808-821"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145449871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Young children's understanding of military family life: Co-creating educational and therapeutic resources using children's voices 幼儿对军人家庭生活的理解:用孩子的声音共同创造教育和治疗资源
IF 0.6 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES Pub Date : 2025-10-08 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.70033
Marg Rogers, Margaret Sims, Amy Johnson, Michelle Gossner, Einar B. Thorsteinsson

Young children from military families often struggle to comprehend the changes occurring within their households due to parental training and deployment. This paper (a) presents children's understandings of their experiences in Australian military families in a study, and then (b) provides an example of how we used children's voices to co-create free psychosocial resources to better support this cohort, which can be employed by those working with these families. A participatory Mosaic Approach was employed to capture the voices of 19 young children. Inductive thematic analysis viewed through a socio-cultural lens revealed that children's understandings can be improved through educational activities using age-appropriate and culturally relevant resources, encouraging discussions and educational activities. These findings are significant as they capture and amplify the voices of young children in military families. This served as a catalyst for a co-creation project, resulting in a suite of psychosocial resources based on these findings and other lived experience narratives, relevant literature, and the insights of those who assist these families. These free online resources allow these children to thrive rather than merely survive. This will interest military family researchers, policymakers within military organizations, and those supporting these families.

由于父母的训练和部署,军人家庭的孩子往往很难理解家庭中发生的变化。本文(a)在一项研究中介绍了儿童对他们在澳大利亚军人家庭中的经历的理解,然后(b)提供了一个例子,说明我们如何利用儿童的声音共同创造免费的心理社会资源,以更好地支持这一群体,这些资源可以被与这些家庭一起工作的人使用。采用参与式马赛克方法捕捉19名幼儿的声音。通过社会文化视角的归纳主题分析表明,儿童的理解可以通过使用适合年龄和文化相关资源的教育活动,鼓励讨论和教育活动来提高。这些发现意义重大,因为它们捕捉并放大了军人家庭中年幼儿童的声音。这成为一个共同创造项目的催化剂,产生了一套基于这些发现和其他生活经验叙述、相关文献以及帮助这些家庭的人的见解的社会心理资源。这些免费的在线资源让这些孩子茁壮成长,而不仅仅是生存。这将引起军人家庭研究人员、军事组织内的政策制定者和那些支持这些家庭的人的兴趣。
{"title":"Young children's understanding of military family life: Co-creating educational and therapeutic resources using children's voices","authors":"Marg Rogers,&nbsp;Margaret Sims,&nbsp;Amy Johnson,&nbsp;Michelle Gossner,&nbsp;Einar B. Thorsteinsson","doi":"10.1111/fcre.70033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.70033","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Young children from military families often struggle to comprehend the changes occurring within their households due to parental training and deployment. This paper (a) presents children's understandings of their experiences in Australian military families in a study, and then (b) provides an example of how we used children's voices to co-create free psychosocial resources to better support this cohort, which can be employed by those working with these families. A participatory Mosaic Approach was employed to capture the voices of 19 young children. Inductive thematic analysis viewed through a socio-cultural lens revealed that children's understandings can be improved through educational activities using age-appropriate and culturally relevant resources, encouraging discussions and educational activities. These findings are significant as they capture and amplify the voices of young children in military families. This served as a catalyst for a co-creation project, resulting in a suite of psychosocial resources based on these findings and other lived experience narratives, relevant literature, and the insights of those who assist these families. These free online resources allow these children to thrive rather than merely survive. This will interest military family researchers, policymakers within military organizations, and those supporting these families.</p>","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"63 4","pages":"601-618"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145449797","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Developing a formal model of peer support for bereaved military families: A co-production and evidence-based approach 为丧失亲人的军人家庭建立同伴支持的正式模式:一种联合制作和循证方法
IF 0.6 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES Pub Date : 2025-10-07 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.70020
Gill McGill, Shannon Allen, Alison K. Osborne, Jessica Gates

This study aimed to develop a formal model of peer support for bereaved military families in the United Kingdom (UK) that is co-designed, inclusive, and integrated within the existing bereavement support system, without requiring affiliation with specific associations. The need for such a model was identified through a previous study (McGill et al., 2022), which examined the long-term impact of military bereavement and recommended the development of peer support tailored to the short, medium, and long-term needs of bereaved families. In response, the present research adopted an applied mixed-methods approach, incorporating a systematic narrative review, online survey, expert consultation, and co-production workshops. This iterative, multi-phase process ensured the resulting pilot framework was grounded in the lived experiences of those affected by sudden or traumatic military loss. The findings informed the co-production of an evidence-based peer support model intended to enhance, compliment, and extend the nature and reach of existing bereavement services.

本研究旨在为英国丧失亲人的军人家庭建立一个正式的同伴支持模式,该模式是共同设计的,具有包容性,并整合在现有的丧亲支持系统中,而不需要隶属于特定的协会。之前的一项研究(McGill et al., 2022)确定了对这种模型的需求,该研究考察了军人丧亲的长期影响,并建议针对丧亲家庭的短期、中期和长期需求开发同伴支持。因此,本研究采用了一种应用的混合方法,包括系统的叙述回顾、在线调查、专家咨询和合作制作研讨会。这一反复的、多阶段的过程确保了最终的试点框架以那些受到突然或创伤性军事损失影响的人的生活经验为基础。研究结果为共同制定以证据为基础的同伴支持模式提供了信息,该模式旨在加强、补充和扩大现有丧亲服务的性质和范围。
{"title":"Developing a formal model of peer support for bereaved military families: A co-production and evidence-based approach","authors":"Gill McGill,&nbsp;Shannon Allen,&nbsp;Alison K. Osborne,&nbsp;Jessica Gates","doi":"10.1111/fcre.70020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.70020","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aimed to develop a formal model of peer support for bereaved military families in the United Kingdom (UK) that is co-designed, inclusive, and integrated within the existing bereavement support system, without requiring affiliation with specific associations. The need for such a model was identified through a previous study (McGill et al., 2022), which examined the long-term impact of military bereavement and recommended the development of peer support tailored to the short, medium, and long-term needs of bereaved families. In response, the present research adopted an applied mixed-methods approach, incorporating a systematic narrative review, online survey, expert consultation, and co-production workshops. This iterative, multi-phase process ensured the resulting pilot framework was grounded in the lived experiences of those affected by sudden or traumatic military loss. The findings informed the co-production of an evidence-based peer support model intended to enhance, compliment, and extend the nature and reach of existing bereavement services.</p>","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"63 4","pages":"701-714"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fcre.70020","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145449850","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Love lost, borders crossed: Ensuring U.S. divorcees have their marital distributions enforced in the Caribbean 失去爱,跨越国界:确保美国离婚人士的婚姻分配在加勒比地区得到执行
IF 0.6 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES Pub Date : 2025-10-06 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.70024
Joshua Richards

When U.S. spouses receive marital distributions, some or all of their assets may be unreachable because they are held in the Caribbean. This note examines why U.S. marital distributions are not recognized and enforced in specific Caribbean nations. This note further explores the procedural difficulty of litigating in Caribbean courts. This note argues to amend the Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters in order to lift the ban on marital distributions. This note also addresses key counterarguments to this proposed amendment of the treaty–specifically the hesitancy of some Caribbean nations to sign on.

当美国配偶获得婚姻分配时,他们的部分或全部资产可能无法获得,因为它们被存放在加勒比海地区。这篇文章探讨了为什么美国的婚姻分配在特定的加勒比国家不被承认和执行。本说明进一步探讨了在加勒比法院提起诉讼的程序困难。本说明主张修订《关于承认和执行民事或商事外国判决的海牙公约》,以解除对婚姻分配的禁令。本说明还讨论了对这一拟议的条约修正案的主要反对意见,特别是一些加勒比国家对签署的犹豫。
{"title":"Love lost, borders crossed: Ensuring U.S. divorcees have their marital distributions enforced in the Caribbean","authors":"Joshua Richards","doi":"10.1111/fcre.70024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.70024","url":null,"abstract":"<p>When U.S. spouses receive marital distributions, some or all of their assets may be unreachable because they are held in the Caribbean. This note examines why U.S. marital distributions are not recognized and enforced in specific Caribbean nations. This note further explores the procedural difficulty of litigating in Caribbean courts. This note argues to amend the Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters in order to lift the ban on marital distributions. This note also addresses key counterarguments to this proposed amendment of the treaty–specifically the hesitancy of some Caribbean nations to sign on.</p>","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"63 4","pages":"860-874"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145449951","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The family experience of the Invictus Games through a work family conflict lens: An interpretative phenomenological analysis 从工作家庭冲突视角看不可征服运动会的家庭体验:解释性现象学分析
IF 0.6 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES Pub Date : 2025-10-06 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.70025
Lauren Stephanie Roberts, Celina H. Shirazipour, Deborah Norris, Heidi Cramm

The Invictus Games are an international adaptive sports competition for wounded, injured, and/or ill military members and veterans. Essential to the Games are the families and friends of the competitors, who are involved from selection to post-game. Though families are integral, their experiences are underexplored. Little research to date has focused on the families, and even less research has been conducted using a family science lens. Work–family conflict theory provides a way to examine the stressors and support that underlie the family experience. Using interpretative phenomenological analysis with a work–family conflict lens, this project explores the family members' perspectives of being at the Invictus Games. Participants were past family and friends from Canada (n = 5), the UK (n = 1) and Australia (n = 1). The results display that the Invictus Games can be a very positive experience for both the individual family members as well as the family as a whole. The results challenge the existing idea that participating in sports automatically results in work–family conflict. This project highlights the importance of family inclusion within and throughout military and veteran adaptive sport competitions. As the Invictus Games continue to grow, it is important to be intentional about how families are supported.

不可征服运动会是一项为受伤、受伤和/或生病的军人和退伍军人举办的国际适应性体育比赛。运动员的家人和朋友对奥运会至关重要,他们从选拔到赛后都参与其中。虽然家庭是不可或缺的,但他们的经历却没有被充分发掘。迄今为止,很少有研究关注家庭,而从家庭科学的角度进行的研究就更少了。工作-家庭冲突理论提供了一种方法来检查家庭经验背后的压力源和支持。本项目以工作与家庭冲突为视角,运用解释性现象学分析,探讨家庭成员在不可征服运动会中的视角。参与者是来自加拿大(n = 5)、英国(n = 1)和澳大利亚(n = 1)的过去的家人和朋友。研究结果表明,无论对家庭成员个人还是整个家庭来说,“不可征服”运动会都是一种非常积极的体验。研究结果挑战了现有的观点,即参加体育运动必然会导致工作与家庭的冲突。该项目强调了在军事和退伍军人适应性体育比赛中融入家庭的重要性。随着“不可征服运动会”的持续发展,重要的是要有意识地为家庭提供支持。
{"title":"The family experience of the Invictus Games through a work family conflict lens: An interpretative phenomenological analysis","authors":"Lauren Stephanie Roberts,&nbsp;Celina H. Shirazipour,&nbsp;Deborah Norris,&nbsp;Heidi Cramm","doi":"10.1111/fcre.70025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.70025","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Invictus Games are an international adaptive sports competition for wounded, injured, and/or ill military members and veterans. Essential to the Games are the families and friends of the competitors, who are involved from selection to post-game. Though families are integral, their experiences are underexplored. Little research to date has focused on the families, and even less research has been conducted using a family science lens. Work–family conflict theory provides a way to examine the stressors and support that underlie the family experience. Using interpretative phenomenological analysis with a work–family conflict lens, this project explores the family members' perspectives of being at the Invictus Games. Participants were past family and friends from Canada (<i>n</i> = 5), the UK (<i>n</i> = 1) and Australia (<i>n</i> = 1). The results display that the Invictus Games can be a very positive experience for both the individual family members as well as the family as a whole. The results challenge the existing idea that participating in sports automatically results in work–family conflict. This project highlights the importance of family inclusion within and throughout military and veteran adaptive sport competitions. As the Invictus Games continue to grow, it is important to be intentional about how families are supported.</p>","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"63 4","pages":"715-727"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fcre.70025","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145449954","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Families broken forever: Why surviving spouses of wrongfully convicted and imprisoned persons are entitled to compensation 永远破碎的家庭:为什么被错误定罪和监禁的人的幸存配偶有权获得赔偿
IF 0.6 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES Pub Date : 2025-10-06 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.70022
Isaiah J. Harris

Wrongful convictions and imprisonment are a natural consequence of our criminal justice system. New York is one of 35 states with wrongful conviction compensation statutes, offering some form of relief to individuals and their families. However, the incidence rate of suicide among these families calls for a solution when that wrongly convicted individual takes their life. This note advocates for an expanded form of relief under the New York State Court of Claims Act Section 8-b, creating a cause of action for surviving spouses to receive compensation in the wake of their partner's death.

错误的定罪和监禁是我们刑事司法系统的自然结果。纽约州是美国35个有错误定罪赔偿法规的州之一,为个人及其家人提供某种形式的救济。然而,这些家庭的自杀率需要一个解决方案,当被错误定罪的人自杀时。本说明主张根据《纽约州索赔法院法》第8-b条扩大救济形式,为未亡配偶在其配偶死亡后获得赔偿创造诉讼理由。
{"title":"Families broken forever: Why surviving spouses of wrongfully convicted and imprisoned persons are entitled to compensation","authors":"Isaiah J. Harris","doi":"10.1111/fcre.70022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.70022","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Wrongful convictions and imprisonment are a natural consequence of our criminal justice system. New York is one of 35 states with wrongful conviction compensation statutes, offering some form of relief to individuals and their families. However, the incidence rate of suicide among these families calls for a solution when that wrongly convicted individual takes their life. This note advocates for an expanded form of relief under the New York State Court of Claims Act Section 8-b, creating a cause of action for surviving spouses to receive compensation in the wake of their partner's death.</p>","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"63 4","pages":"845-859"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145449952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Social and emotional wellbeing of children from Australian military families: Insight from early childhood educators 来自澳大利亚军人家庭的儿童的社会和情感健康:来自早期儿童教育家的见解
IF 0.6 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES Pub Date : 2025-10-06 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.70026
Marg Rogers, Einar B. Thorsteinsson, Margaret Sims, Amy Johnson, Emily Small, Michelle Gossner, Navjot Bhullar

During their careers, many Australian early childhood educators will teach children from military and veteran families; one in 20 households includes someone with military experience. Children from these families are impacted by the stressors of military family life, including frequent relocations, parental absences, and potential parental injuries. This mixed-methods study explored the perceptions of 27 educators about supporting young children (aged 2–5 years) from military families, their understanding of children's responses to unique stressors, and their confidence in providing support. Educators generally evaluated the social and emotional wellbeing of these children positively. However, approximately 25% reported some children struggled with adaptation to change, and 25.9% were only partially confident in understanding children's responses to military-specific stressors. Most educators (77.8%) received no relevant training, and 59.2% lacked access to quality, research-based Australian resources. Qualitative data provided further insights into children's responses to military family stressors. Findings highlight the need for targeted professional development and accessible resources for educators supporting children from military families. Despite positive overall assessments, significant gaps exist in educator training and confidence. Quality resources would enhance educators' capacity to support the unique needs of these children, especially in rural communities with limited services.

在他们的职业生涯中,许多澳大利亚幼儿教育工作者将教来自军人和退伍军人家庭的孩子;每20个家庭中就有一个家庭有军事经验。这些家庭的孩子受到军人家庭生活压力的影响,包括频繁的搬迁、父母的缺席和潜在的父母伤害。本研究探讨了27名教育工作者对来自军人家庭的幼儿(2-5岁)的支持看法,他们对儿童对特殊压力源的反应的理解,以及他们提供支持的信心。教育工作者通常对这些孩子的社会和情感健康做出积极的评价。然而,大约25%的人报告说,一些儿童难以适应变化,25.9%的人对理解儿童对军事特定压力源的反应只有部分信心。大多数教育工作者(77.8%)没有接受过相关培训,59.2%的教育工作者无法获得高质量的、以研究为基础的澳大利亚资源。定性数据为儿童对军人家庭压力源的反应提供了进一步的见解。调查结果强调,教育工作者需要有针对性的专业发展和可获得的资源,为来自军人家庭的儿童提供支持。尽管总体评价是积极的,但在教育工作者的培训和信心方面存在重大差距。优质资源将提高教育工作者的能力,以支持这些儿童的独特需要,特别是在服务有限的农村社区。
{"title":"Social and emotional wellbeing of children from Australian military families: Insight from early childhood educators","authors":"Marg Rogers,&nbsp;Einar B. Thorsteinsson,&nbsp;Margaret Sims,&nbsp;Amy Johnson,&nbsp;Emily Small,&nbsp;Michelle Gossner,&nbsp;Navjot Bhullar","doi":"10.1111/fcre.70026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.70026","url":null,"abstract":"<p>During their careers, many Australian early childhood educators will teach children from military and veteran families; one in 20 households includes someone with military experience. Children from these families are impacted by the stressors of military family life, including frequent relocations, parental absences, and potential parental injuries. This mixed-methods study explored the perceptions of 27 educators about supporting young children (aged 2–5 years) from military families, their understanding of children's responses to unique stressors, and their confidence in providing support. Educators generally evaluated the social and emotional wellbeing of these children positively. However, approximately 25% reported some children struggled with adaptation to change, and 25.9% were only partially confident in understanding children's responses to military-specific stressors. Most educators (77.8%) received no relevant training, and 59.2% lacked access to quality, research-based Australian resources. Qualitative data provided further insights into children's responses to military family stressors. Findings highlight the need for targeted professional development and accessible resources for educators supporting children from military families. Despite positive overall assessments, significant gaps exist in educator training and confidence. Quality resources would enhance educators' capacity to support the unique needs of these children, especially in rural communities with limited services.</p>","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"63 4","pages":"685-700"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145449953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
October 2025 Editorial Note 2025年10月
IF 0.6 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES Pub Date : 2025-09-30 DOI: 10.1111/fcre.70014
Barbara A. Babb, Marsha Kline Pruett
{"title":"October 2025 Editorial Note","authors":"Barbara A. Babb,&nbsp;Marsha Kline Pruett","doi":"10.1111/fcre.70014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.70014","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"63 4","pages":"566-567"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145450085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Family Court Review
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1