Pub Date : 2024-05-01DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.106b5.bjj-2023-1381
Lee M Jeys, Joachim Thorkildsen, Vineet Kurisunkal, Ajay Puri, Pietro Ruggieri, Matthew T Houdek, Richard A Boyle, Walid Ebeid, Eduardo Botello, Guy V Morris, , Minna K Laitinen, , Adesegun Abudu, Keisuke Ae, Manish Agarwal, Vivek Ajit Singh, Toru Akiyama, Jose I Albergo, John Alexander, Bugra Alpan, Ahmed Aoude, Apichat Asavamongkolkul, William Aston, Thomas Baad-Hansen, Tessa Balach, Joseph Benevenia, Peter Bergh, Nicholas Bernthal, Odion Binitie, Michele Boffano, Jos Bramer, Harriet Branford White, Bernadette Brennan, Jorge Cabrolier, Jose A Calvo Haro, Domenico A Campanacci, Rodrigo Cardoso, Richard Carey Smith, Nicolas Casales Fresnga, Jose M Casanova, Oscar Ceballos, Chung M Chan, Yang-Guk Chung, Miguel A Clara-Altamirano, Gillian Cribb, Solomon Dadia, Dietmar Dammerer, Marieke de Vaal, Javier Delgado Obando, Shaneel Deo, Claudia Di Bella, Davide M Donati, Makoto Endo, Levent Eralp, Bulent Erol, Scott Evans, Will Eward, Fabrice Fiorenza, Joao Freitas, Philipp T Funovics, Marcos Galli Serra, Michelle Ghert, Kanishka Ghosh, Luis C Gomez Mier, Jesus Gomez Vallejo, Anthony Griffin, Ashish Gulia, Maurice Guzman, Jendrik Hardes, John Healey, Adriana Hernandez, Asle Hesla, Chindanai Hongsaprabhas, Francis Hornicek, Keith Hosking, Shintaro Iwata, Jake Jagiello, Luke Johnson, Andy Johnston, Min Wook Joo, Paul Jutte, Bilal Kapanci, Zeeshan Khan, Hiroshi Kobayashi, Yehuda Kollender, Sebastian Koob, Daniel Kotrych, Louis-Romee Le Nail, Pawel Legosz, Burkhard Lehner, Andreas Leithner, Valerae Lewis, Peng Lin, Francisco Linares, Santiago Lozano Calderon, Ashish Mahendra, Ferdiansyah Mahyudin, Eric Mascard, Jean-Camille Mattei, Louise McCullough, Manuel R Medellin Rincon, Rhidian Morgan-Jones, Diego J Moriel Garcesco, Sophie Mottard, Robert Nakayama, Prashant Narhari, Gary O'Toole, Oliveira Vania, André Olivier, Mohamed Omar, Eduardo Ortiz-Cruz, Harzem Ozger, Korhan Ozkan, Emanuela Palmerini, Panayiotis Papagelopoulos, Michael Parry, Sam Patton, Michael M Petersen, Gerard Powell, Mark Puhaindran, Anand Raja, Raja B Rajasekaran, Lauris Repsa, Mickael Ropars, Andrea Sambri, Thomas Schubert, Ahmad Shehadeh, Geoffrey Siegel, Scott Sommerville, Andre Spiguel, Jonathan Stevenson, Gwen Sys, Thomas Temple, Frank Traub, Hiroyuki Tsuchiya, Juan Valencia, Michel Van de Sande, Gualter Vaz, Roberto Velez Villa, Oleg Vyrva, Hazem Wafa, Wan I Wan Faisham Numan, Edward Wang, David Warnock, Joel Werier, Kwok-Chuen Wong, Yamamoto Norio, Ye Zhaoming, Suraya Zainul Abidin, Tomas Zamora, Juan P Zumarraga, Ghaith Abou-Nouar, Carsten Gebert, R L Randall
Chondrosarcoma is the second most common surgically treated primary bone sarcoma. Despite a large number of scientific papers in the literature, there is still significant controversy about diagnostics, treatment of the primary tumour, subtypes, and complications. Therefore, consensus on its day-to-day treatment decisions is needed. In January 2024, the Birmingham Orthopaedic Oncology Meeting (BOOM) attempted to gain global consensus from 300 delegates from over 50 countries. The meeting focused on these critical areas and aimed to generate consensus statements based on evidence amalgamation and expert opinion from diverse geographical regions. In parallel, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in oncological reconstructions poses unique challenges due to factors such as adjuvant treatments, large exposures, and the complexity of surgery. The meeting debated two-stage revisions, antibiotic prophylaxis, managing acute PJI in patients undergoing chemotherapy, and defining the best strategies for wound management and allograft reconstruction. The objectives of the meeting extended beyond resolving immediate controversies. It sought to foster global collaboration among specialists attending the meeting, and to encourage future research projects to address unsolved dilemmas. By highlighting areas of disagreement and promoting collaborative research endeavours, this initiative aims to enhance treatment standards and potentially improve outcomes for patients globally. This paper sets out some of the controversies and questions that were debated in the meeting.
{"title":"Controversies in orthopaedic oncology.","authors":"Lee M Jeys, Joachim Thorkildsen, Vineet Kurisunkal, Ajay Puri, Pietro Ruggieri, Matthew T Houdek, Richard A Boyle, Walid Ebeid, Eduardo Botello, Guy V Morris, , Minna K Laitinen, , Adesegun Abudu, Keisuke Ae, Manish Agarwal, Vivek Ajit Singh, Toru Akiyama, Jose I Albergo, John Alexander, Bugra Alpan, Ahmed Aoude, Apichat Asavamongkolkul, William Aston, Thomas Baad-Hansen, Tessa Balach, Joseph Benevenia, Peter Bergh, Nicholas Bernthal, Odion Binitie, Michele Boffano, Jos Bramer, Harriet Branford White, Bernadette Brennan, Jorge Cabrolier, Jose A Calvo Haro, Domenico A Campanacci, Rodrigo Cardoso, Richard Carey Smith, Nicolas Casales Fresnga, Jose M Casanova, Oscar Ceballos, Chung M Chan, Yang-Guk Chung, Miguel A Clara-Altamirano, Gillian Cribb, Solomon Dadia, Dietmar Dammerer, Marieke de Vaal, Javier Delgado Obando, Shaneel Deo, Claudia Di Bella, Davide M Donati, Makoto Endo, Levent Eralp, Bulent Erol, Scott Evans, Will Eward, Fabrice Fiorenza, Joao Freitas, Philipp T Funovics, Marcos Galli Serra, Michelle Ghert, Kanishka Ghosh, Luis C Gomez Mier, Jesus Gomez Vallejo, Anthony Griffin, Ashish Gulia, Maurice Guzman, Jendrik Hardes, John Healey, Adriana Hernandez, Asle Hesla, Chindanai Hongsaprabhas, Francis Hornicek, Keith Hosking, Shintaro Iwata, Jake Jagiello, Luke Johnson, Andy Johnston, Min Wook Joo, Paul Jutte, Bilal Kapanci, Zeeshan Khan, Hiroshi Kobayashi, Yehuda Kollender, Sebastian Koob, Daniel Kotrych, Louis-Romee Le Nail, Pawel Legosz, Burkhard Lehner, Andreas Leithner, Valerae Lewis, Peng Lin, Francisco Linares, Santiago Lozano Calderon, Ashish Mahendra, Ferdiansyah Mahyudin, Eric Mascard, Jean-Camille Mattei, Louise McCullough, Manuel R Medellin Rincon, Rhidian Morgan-Jones, Diego J Moriel Garcesco, Sophie Mottard, Robert Nakayama, Prashant Narhari, Gary O'Toole, Oliveira Vania, André Olivier, Mohamed Omar, Eduardo Ortiz-Cruz, Harzem Ozger, Korhan Ozkan, Emanuela Palmerini, Panayiotis Papagelopoulos, Michael Parry, Sam Patton, Michael M Petersen, Gerard Powell, Mark Puhaindran, Anand Raja, Raja B Rajasekaran, Lauris Repsa, Mickael Ropars, Andrea Sambri, Thomas Schubert, Ahmad Shehadeh, Geoffrey Siegel, Scott Sommerville, Andre Spiguel, Jonathan Stevenson, Gwen Sys, Thomas Temple, Frank Traub, Hiroyuki Tsuchiya, Juan Valencia, Michel Van de Sande, Gualter Vaz, Roberto Velez Villa, Oleg Vyrva, Hazem Wafa, Wan I Wan Faisham Numan, Edward Wang, David Warnock, Joel Werier, Kwok-Chuen Wong, Yamamoto Norio, Ye Zhaoming, Suraya Zainul Abidin, Tomas Zamora, Juan P Zumarraga, Ghaith Abou-Nouar, Carsten Gebert, R L Randall","doi":"10.1302/0301-620x.106b5.bjj-2023-1381","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.106b5.bjj-2023-1381","url":null,"abstract":"Chondrosarcoma is the second most common surgically treated primary bone sarcoma. Despite a large number of scientific papers in the literature, there is still significant controversy about diagnostics, treatment of the primary tumour, subtypes, and complications. Therefore, consensus on its day-to-day treatment decisions is needed. In January 2024, the Birmingham Orthopaedic Oncology Meeting (BOOM) attempted to gain global consensus from 300 delegates from over 50 countries. The meeting focused on these critical areas and aimed to generate consensus statements based on evidence amalgamation and expert opinion from diverse geographical regions. In parallel, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in oncological reconstructions poses unique challenges due to factors such as adjuvant treatments, large exposures, and the complexity of surgery. The meeting debated two-stage revisions, antibiotic prophylaxis, managing acute PJI in patients undergoing chemotherapy, and defining the best strategies for wound management and allograft reconstruction. The objectives of the meeting extended beyond resolving immediate controversies. It sought to foster global collaboration among specialists attending the meeting, and to encourage future research projects to address unsolved dilemmas. By highlighting areas of disagreement and promoting collaborative research endeavours, this initiative aims to enhance treatment standards and potentially improve outcomes for patients globally. This paper sets out some of the controversies and questions that were debated in the meeting.","PeriodicalId":516847,"journal":{"name":"The Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140820963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-01DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.106b2.bjj-2023-0711.r1
Chetan Khatri, Andrew Metcalfe, Peter Wall, Martin Underwood, Fares S Haddad, Edward T Davis
Total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA, TKA) are largely successful procedures; however, both have variable outcomes, resulting in some patients being dissatisfied with the outcome. Surgeons are turning to technologies such as robotic-assisted surgery in an attempt to improve outcomes. Robust studies are needed to find out if these innovations are really benefitting patients. The Robotic Arthroplasty Clinical and Cost Effectiveness Randomised Controlled Trials (RACER) trials are multicentre, patient-blinded randomized controlled trials. The patients have primary osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. The operation is Mako-assisted THA or TKA and the control groups have operations using conventional instruments. The primary clinical outcome is the Forgotten Joint Score at 12 months, and there is a built-in analysis of cost-effectiveness. Secondary outcomes include early pain, the alignment of the components, and medium- to long-term outcomes. This annotation outlines the need to assess these technologies and discusses the design and challenges when conducting such trials, including surgical workflows, isolating the effect of the operation, blinding, and assessing the learning curve. Finally, the future of robotic surgery is discussed, including the need to contemporaneously introduce and evaluate such technologies.
{"title":"Robotic trials in arthroplasty surgery.","authors":"Chetan Khatri, Andrew Metcalfe, Peter Wall, Martin Underwood, Fares S Haddad, Edward T Davis","doi":"10.1302/0301-620x.106b2.bjj-2023-0711.r1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.106b2.bjj-2023-0711.r1","url":null,"abstract":"Total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA, TKA) are largely successful procedures; however, both have variable outcomes, resulting in some patients being dissatisfied with the outcome. Surgeons are turning to technologies such as robotic-assisted surgery in an attempt to improve outcomes. Robust studies are needed to find out if these innovations are really benefitting patients. The Robotic Arthroplasty Clinical and Cost Effectiveness Randomised Controlled Trials (RACER) trials are multicentre, patient-blinded randomized controlled trials. The patients have primary osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. The operation is Mako-assisted THA or TKA and the control groups have operations using conventional instruments. The primary clinical outcome is the Forgotten Joint Score at 12 months, and there is a built-in analysis of cost-effectiveness. Secondary outcomes include early pain, the alignment of the components, and medium- to long-term outcomes. This annotation outlines the need to assess these technologies and discusses the design and challenges when conducting such trials, including surgical workflows, isolating the effect of the operation, blinding, and assessing the learning curve. Finally, the future of robotic surgery is discussed, including the need to contemporaneously introduce and evaluate such technologies.","PeriodicalId":516847,"journal":{"name":"The Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139655824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-01DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.106b2.bjj-2023-0501.r1
Shaoshan Liu, Yuxi Su
Medial humeral epicondyle fractures (MHEFs) are common elbow fractures in children. Open reduction should be performed in patients with MHEF who have entrapped intra-articular fragments as well as displacement. However, following open reduction, transposition of the ulnar nerve is disputed. The aim of this study is to evaluate the need for ulnar nerve exploration and transposition.
{"title":"The necessity of ulnar nerve exploration and translocation in open reduction of medial humeral epicondyle fractures in children.","authors":"Shaoshan Liu, Yuxi Su","doi":"10.1302/0301-620x.106b2.bjj-2023-0501.r1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.106b2.bjj-2023-0501.r1","url":null,"abstract":"Medial humeral epicondyle fractures (MHEFs) are common elbow fractures in children. Open reduction should be performed in patients with MHEF who have entrapped intra-articular fragments as well as displacement. However, following open reduction, transposition of the ulnar nerve is disputed. The aim of this study is to evaluate the need for ulnar nerve exploration and transposition.","PeriodicalId":516847,"journal":{"name":"The Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139655827","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-01DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.106b2.bjj-2023-0605.r1
Lutz Dreyer, Christian Bader, Thilo Flörkemeier, Michael Wagner
The risk of mechanical failure of modular revision hip stems is frequently mentioned in the literature, but little is currently known about the actual clinical failure rates of this type of prosthesis. The current retrospective long-term analysis examines the distal and modular failure patterns of the Prevision hip stem from 18 years of clinical use. A design improvement of the modular taper was introduced in 2008, and the data could also be used to compare the original and the current design of the modular connection.
{"title":"Analysis of modular taper fractures of the revision hip stem Prevision and comparison of the original and current taper design.","authors":"Lutz Dreyer, Christian Bader, Thilo Flörkemeier, Michael Wagner","doi":"10.1302/0301-620x.106b2.bjj-2023-0605.r1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.106b2.bjj-2023-0605.r1","url":null,"abstract":"The risk of mechanical failure of modular revision hip stems is frequently mentioned in the literature, but little is currently known about the actual clinical failure rates of this type of prosthesis. The current retrospective long-term analysis examines the distal and modular failure patterns of the Prevision hip stem from 18 years of clinical use. A design improvement of the modular taper was introduced in 2008, and the data could also be used to compare the original and the current design of the modular connection.","PeriodicalId":516847,"journal":{"name":"The Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139655829","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-01DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.106b2.bjj-2023-0598.r2
Juan A Gallego, Dani Rotman, Adam C Watts
Acute and chronic injuries of the interosseus membrane can result in longitudinal instability of the forearm. Reconstruction of the central band of the interosseus membrane can help to restore biomechanical stability. Different methods have been used to reconstruct the central band, including tendon grafts, bone-ligament-bone grafts, and synthetic grafts. This Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, and Long-term (IDEAL) phase 1 study aims to review the clinical results of reconstruction using a synthetic braided cross-linked graft secured at either end with an Endobutton to restore the force balance between the bones of the forearm.
{"title":"Central band interosseus membrane reconstruction for longitudinal instability injuries of the forearm.","authors":"Juan A Gallego, Dani Rotman, Adam C Watts","doi":"10.1302/0301-620x.106b2.bjj-2023-0598.r2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.106b2.bjj-2023-0598.r2","url":null,"abstract":"Acute and chronic injuries of the interosseus membrane can result in longitudinal instability of the forearm. Reconstruction of the central band of the interosseus membrane can help to restore biomechanical stability. Different methods have been used to reconstruct the central band, including tendon grafts, bone-ligament-bone grafts, and synthetic grafts. This Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, and Long-term (IDEAL) phase 1 study aims to review the clinical results of reconstruction using a synthetic braided cross-linked graft secured at either end with an Endobutton to restore the force balance between the bones of the forearm.","PeriodicalId":516847,"journal":{"name":"The Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"458 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139655823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-01DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.106b2.bjj-2023-0862.r1
Thies J N van der Lelij, Perla J Marang-van de Mheen, Bart L Kaptein, Lennard A Koster, Peter Ljung, Rob G H H Nelissen, Sören Toksvig-Larsen
The objective of this study was to compare the two-year migration and clinical outcomes of a new cementless hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated titanium acetabular shell with its previous version, which shared the same geometrical design but a different manufacturing process for applying the titanium surface.
{"title":"Migration and clinical outcomes of a novel cementless hydroxyapatite-coated titanium acetabular shell: two-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis.","authors":"Thies J N van der Lelij, Perla J Marang-van de Mheen, Bart L Kaptein, Lennard A Koster, Peter Ljung, Rob G H H Nelissen, Sören Toksvig-Larsen","doi":"10.1302/0301-620x.106b2.bjj-2023-0862.r1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.106b2.bjj-2023-0862.r1","url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study was to compare the two-year migration and clinical outcomes of a new cementless hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated titanium acetabular shell with its previous version, which shared the same geometrical design but a different manufacturing process for applying the titanium surface.","PeriodicalId":516847,"journal":{"name":"The Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139655825","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-01DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.106b2.bjj-2023-0751
Jay H Park, Juneseok Won, Han-Soo Kim, Yongsung Kim, Shin Kim, Ilkyu Han
This study aimed to compare the performance of survival prediction models for bone metastases of the extremities (BM-E) with pathological fractures in an Asian cohort, and investigate patient characteristics associated with survival.
{"title":"Comparison of survival prediction models for bone metastases of the extremities following surgery.","authors":"Jay H Park, Juneseok Won, Han-Soo Kim, Yongsung Kim, Shin Kim, Ilkyu Han","doi":"10.1302/0301-620x.106b2.bjj-2023-0751","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.106b2.bjj-2023-0751","url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to compare the performance of survival prediction models for bone metastases of the extremities (BM-E) with pathological fractures in an Asian cohort, and investigate patient characteristics associated with survival.","PeriodicalId":516847,"journal":{"name":"The Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139655821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-01DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.106b2.bjj-2023-0692.r2
Neil Donald, Grace Eniola, Krisztian Deierl
Hip fractures are some of the most common fractures encountered in orthopaedic practice. We aimed to identify whether perioperative hypotension is a predictor of 30-day mortality, and to stratify patient groups that would benefit from closer monitoring and early intervention. While there is literature on intraoperative blood pressure, there are limited studies examining pre- and postoperative blood pressure.
{"title":"Postoperative hypotension following acute hip fracture surgery is a predictor of 30-day mortality.","authors":"Neil Donald, Grace Eniola, Krisztian Deierl","doi":"10.1302/0301-620x.106b2.bjj-2023-0692.r2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.106b2.bjj-2023-0692.r2","url":null,"abstract":"Hip fractures are some of the most common fractures encountered in orthopaedic practice. We aimed to identify whether perioperative hypotension is a predictor of 30-day mortality, and to stratify patient groups that would benefit from closer monitoring and early intervention. While there is literature on intraoperative blood pressure, there are limited studies examining pre- and postoperative blood pressure.","PeriodicalId":516847,"journal":{"name":"The Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139655820","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-01DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.106b2.bjj-2023-0391.r2
Peter Filtes, Keenan Sobol, Charles Lin, Utkarsh Anil, Timothy Roberts, Carlos Pargas-Colina, Pablo Castañeda
Perthes' disease (PD) is a relatively rare syndrome of idiopathic osteonecrosis of the proximal femoral epiphysis. Treatment for Perthes' disease is controversial due to the many options available, with no clear superiority of one treatment over another. Despite having few evidence-based approaches, many patients with Perthes' disease are managed surgically. Positive outcome reporting, defined as reporting a study variable producing statistically significant positive (beneficial) results, is a phenomenon that can be considered a proxy for the strength of science. This study aims to conduct a systematic literature review with the hypothesis that positive outcome reporting is frequent in studies on the treatment of Perthes' disease.
{"title":"Positive outcome reporting in orthopaedic literature.","authors":"Peter Filtes, Keenan Sobol, Charles Lin, Utkarsh Anil, Timothy Roberts, Carlos Pargas-Colina, Pablo Castañeda","doi":"10.1302/0301-620x.106b2.bjj-2023-0391.r2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.106b2.bjj-2023-0391.r2","url":null,"abstract":"Perthes' disease (PD) is a relatively rare syndrome of idiopathic osteonecrosis of the proximal femoral epiphysis. Treatment for Perthes' disease is controversial due to the many options available, with no clear superiority of one treatment over another. Despite having few evidence-based approaches, many patients with Perthes' disease are managed surgically. Positive outcome reporting, defined as reporting a study variable producing statistically significant positive (beneficial) results, is a phenomenon that can be considered a proxy for the strength of science. This study aims to conduct a systematic literature review with the hypothesis that positive outcome reporting is frequent in studies on the treatment of Perthes' disease.","PeriodicalId":516847,"journal":{"name":"The Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"119 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139655826","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-01DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.106b2.bjj-2023-0706.r1
Mark R J Jenkinson, Tin C C Cheung, Johan Witt, Jonathan R B Hutt
The aim of this study is to evaluate whether acetabular retroversion (AR) represents a structural anatomical abnormality of the pelvis or is a functional phenomenon of pelvic positioning in the sagittal plane, and to what extent the changes that result from patient-specific functional position affect the extent of AR.
{"title":"Acetabular retroversion: functional or anatomical?","authors":"Mark R J Jenkinson, Tin C C Cheung, Johan Witt, Jonathan R B Hutt","doi":"10.1302/0301-620x.106b2.bjj-2023-0706.r1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.106b2.bjj-2023-0706.r1","url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to evaluate whether acetabular retroversion (AR) represents a structural anatomical abnormality of the pelvis or is a functional phenomenon of pelvic positioning in the sagittal plane, and to what extent the changes that result from patient-specific functional position affect the extent of AR.","PeriodicalId":516847,"journal":{"name":"The Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139655828","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}