Pub Date : 2023-10-04DOI: 10.1080/18387357.2023.2262627
Amber D. Zeeman, Justine Jonker, Lars Groeneveld, Emily M. de Krijger, Eline Meijer
Objective To understand mental healthcare professionals’ and clients’ needs and preferences regarding smoking cessation care in mental healthcare settings.
目的了解精神卫生专业人员和患者对精神卫生机构戒烟护理的需求和偏好。
{"title":"‘Clients are the problem owners’: a qualitative study into professionals’ and clients’ perceptions of smoking cessation care for smokers with mental illness","authors":"Amber D. Zeeman, Justine Jonker, Lars Groeneveld, Emily M. de Krijger, Eline Meijer","doi":"10.1080/18387357.2023.2262627","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18387357.2023.2262627","url":null,"abstract":"Objective To understand mental healthcare professionals’ and clients’ needs and preferences regarding smoking cessation care in mental healthcare settings.","PeriodicalId":51720,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Mental Health","volume":"304 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135591339","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-04DOI: 10.1080/18387357.2023.2264416
Aude Villatte, Geneviève Piché, Rima Habib, Janie Gariépy
ABSTRACTObjective This article presents the results of the formative evaluation of a mental health literacy and self-care website intended by and for young people of a parent with a mental illness (YP). Multiple dimensions of the user experience (e.g., satisfaction with the usability of the site; emotions and learning during navigation), as well as the readability of content were measured.Methods In 2021, an online questionnaire was completed by 24 YP aged 14–25 years. Usability testing and the Flesch-Kincaid readability index were used to evaluate the website.Results Participants rated highly the various evaluated dimensions of the user experience and stated that due to the website, they learned several things that correspond to resilience factors frequently reported in the literature (e.g., better understanding of mental disorders and available resources). The Flesch-Kincaid index indicated readability appropriate for 14-year-olds.Discussion The website appears to be a promising tool for supporting resilience in YP. Participants’ suggestions for improvement will be used to develop an optimised version of the website, whose effectiveness can be tested in a randomised control study.KEYWORDS: Self-carewebsitemental health literacyparental mental illnessuser experienceyoung people Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by CRUJeF ; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada: [Grant Number 892-2018-2024].
{"title":"Evaluation of a mental-health literacy and self-care website intended for young people who have a parent with a mental illness","authors":"Aude Villatte, Geneviève Piché, Rima Habib, Janie Gariépy","doi":"10.1080/18387357.2023.2264416","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18387357.2023.2264416","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTObjective This article presents the results of the formative evaluation of a mental health literacy and self-care website intended by and for young people of a parent with a mental illness (YP). Multiple dimensions of the user experience (e.g., satisfaction with the usability of the site; emotions and learning during navigation), as well as the readability of content were measured.Methods In 2021, an online questionnaire was completed by 24 YP aged 14–25 years. Usability testing and the Flesch-Kincaid readability index were used to evaluate the website.Results Participants rated highly the various evaluated dimensions of the user experience and stated that due to the website, they learned several things that correspond to resilience factors frequently reported in the literature (e.g., better understanding of mental disorders and available resources). The Flesch-Kincaid index indicated readability appropriate for 14-year-olds.Discussion The website appears to be a promising tool for supporting resilience in YP. Participants’ suggestions for improvement will be used to develop an optimised version of the website, whose effectiveness can be tested in a randomised control study.KEYWORDS: Self-carewebsitemental health literacyparental mental illnessuser experienceyoung people Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by CRUJeF ; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada: [Grant Number 892-2018-2024].","PeriodicalId":51720,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Mental Health","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135592637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-14DOI: 10.1080/18387357.2023.2253936
Kaśmir Ciechanowski, Dariusz Jemielniak, Andrzej Silczuk
ABSTRACTObjective The aim of the study was to explore community interest in mental health topics during and before the COVID-19 pandemic.Method We gathered and analysed a large dataset (over 3 billion) of views of 1763 English Wikipedia mental health articles, and their counterparts in nine other language versions of Wikipedia, between the period of January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2020.Results The results of this study show that the patterns of Wikipedia searches during the pandemic changed. Interest in articles about insecurities and paraphilias increased. There were more searches for child abuse-related topics. Views for depression decreased.Discussion We hypothesise that during the lockdown and enforced video communication, people’s concern about self-image and privacy arose, and the tendency to follow one’s desires online increased. There may be a possible interaction between media coverage and the novelty with the saturation of a given concept in the public discourse. The observations on the online interests of peers may become a sensitive predictor and early sign of arising new phenomena and increase of ongoing public health problems. The results of this study and future in-depth research may contribute to providing preventive programs including screening digital tools, and online apps for early intervention.KEYWORDS: WikipediaWikipedia searchesmental healthinternetCOVID-19 AcknowledgementsKC conducted the analyses, visualisations, and headed the write-up. DJ came up with the idea, collected the data, and contributed to writing up. AS contributed to the interpretation and writing up.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Conflict of interest statementDJ is a non-paid, voluntary member of the Board of Trustees of Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit publisher of Wikipedia. Authors declare no other conflict of interest.
{"title":"Public interests in mental health topics in COVID-19: evidence from Wikipedia searches","authors":"Kaśmir Ciechanowski, Dariusz Jemielniak, Andrzej Silczuk","doi":"10.1080/18387357.2023.2253936","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18387357.2023.2253936","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTObjective The aim of the study was to explore community interest in mental health topics during and before the COVID-19 pandemic.Method We gathered and analysed a large dataset (over 3 billion) of views of 1763 English Wikipedia mental health articles, and their counterparts in nine other language versions of Wikipedia, between the period of January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2020.Results The results of this study show that the patterns of Wikipedia searches during the pandemic changed. Interest in articles about insecurities and paraphilias increased. There were more searches for child abuse-related topics. Views for depression decreased.Discussion We hypothesise that during the lockdown and enforced video communication, people’s concern about self-image and privacy arose, and the tendency to follow one’s desires online increased. There may be a possible interaction between media coverage and the novelty with the saturation of a given concept in the public discourse. The observations on the online interests of peers may become a sensitive predictor and early sign of arising new phenomena and increase of ongoing public health problems. The results of this study and future in-depth research may contribute to providing preventive programs including screening digital tools, and online apps for early intervention.KEYWORDS: WikipediaWikipedia searchesmental healthinternetCOVID-19 AcknowledgementsKC conducted the analyses, visualisations, and headed the write-up. DJ came up with the idea, collected the data, and contributed to writing up. AS contributed to the interpretation and writing up.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Conflict of interest statementDJ is a non-paid, voluntary member of the Board of Trustees of Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit publisher of Wikipedia. Authors declare no other conflict of interest.","PeriodicalId":51720,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Mental Health","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134913168","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-13DOI: 10.1080/18387357.2023.2254864
Aarthi Ganapathy, Leanne M. Casey, Dale P. Rowland, Araluen Brinawa Grady, Kylie Veale Sotheren, Bonnie A. Clough
Objective Given the potential benefits of digital mental health (DMH) interventions, especially post-COVID-19, ample research focuses on factors that prevent mental health professionals (MHPs) and consumer engagement with DMH technologies. However, questions about the robustness of research designs employed to study DMH barriers remain unanswered. This review aimed to identify methodological approaches to identifying barriers to DMH use.Method Using PRISMA-SCr guided scoping review methodology, the research methods and designs used to study barriers to DMH use among MHPs and consumers were investigated. Four databases were searched using broad terms to identify articles that focused on exploring barriers to DMH use by MHPs and consumers, covering screening, assessment, diagnosis, therapy, counselling, and treatment of mental health issues.Results One hundred and forty-seven papers met the inclusion criteria. Ninety-six studies were qualitative, 25 were quantitative, and 25 were mixed methods. There were 66 consumer studies, 62 MHP studies, and 19 studies included both. Hundred and eight studies were published between 2017 and 2021, focusing on developed nations such as the USA, Australia, and the United Kingdom.Discussion There is increasing interest in the barriers to DMH use, with more research employing qualitative designs to identify DMH use barriers. Consensus regarding key terms and definitions; reliable and valid tools to measure DMH use barriers; and increased efforts to test specific DMH tools in more than one setting are needed to enable a better understanding of factors that influence MHPs’ and consumers’ use of DMH.
{"title":"Methodological approaches in investigating barriers to digital mental health interventions use: a scoping review","authors":"Aarthi Ganapathy, Leanne M. Casey, Dale P. Rowland, Araluen Brinawa Grady, Kylie Veale Sotheren, Bonnie A. Clough","doi":"10.1080/18387357.2023.2254864","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18387357.2023.2254864","url":null,"abstract":"Objective Given the potential benefits of digital mental health (DMH) interventions, especially post-COVID-19, ample research focuses on factors that prevent mental health professionals (MHPs) and consumer engagement with DMH technologies. However, questions about the robustness of research designs employed to study DMH barriers remain unanswered. This review aimed to identify methodological approaches to identifying barriers to DMH use.Method Using PRISMA-SCr guided scoping review methodology, the research methods and designs used to study barriers to DMH use among MHPs and consumers were investigated. Four databases were searched using broad terms to identify articles that focused on exploring barriers to DMH use by MHPs and consumers, covering screening, assessment, diagnosis, therapy, counselling, and treatment of mental health issues.Results One hundred and forty-seven papers met the inclusion criteria. Ninety-six studies were qualitative, 25 were quantitative, and 25 were mixed methods. There were 66 consumer studies, 62 MHP studies, and 19 studies included both. Hundred and eight studies were published between 2017 and 2021, focusing on developed nations such as the USA, Australia, and the United Kingdom.Discussion There is increasing interest in the barriers to DMH use, with more research employing qualitative designs to identify DMH use barriers. Consensus regarding key terms and definitions; reliable and valid tools to measure DMH use barriers; and increased efforts to test specific DMH tools in more than one setting are needed to enable a better understanding of factors that influence MHPs’ and consumers’ use of DMH.","PeriodicalId":51720,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Mental Health","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135734353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-02DOI: 10.1080/18387357.2023.2232615
Andrea Reupert
We already know that ‘good’ research is characterised by rigour, adherence to ethical principles, and an objective, systematic approach to knowledge generation. But what do we mean when we consider research that is good because of its social impact and its beneficial impact on others? In the first instance, research that attests to having a social impact needs to address societal needs and challenges (Reupert, 2018). This means that research questions need to be formulated that directly contribute to improving the wellbeing and quality of life of individuals and communities. Much research has already identified healthcare disparities, the experiences of marginalised groups, and those societal and organisational structures that create inequalities. Likewise, research conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic confirmed the significant health care gaps and the health inequalities of certain population groups that have existed for some time (Berger & Reupert, 2020). I would argue that we already know enough about those groups who are most at risk for their mental health; what we need is research that highlights those systems, interventions and structures that help people, families and communities obtain and maintain access to basic social needs and maintain wellbeing. To identify such approaches, research can be conducted that engages with key stakeholders such as those with lived experience and their families, policymakers, practitioners, and advocacy groups. Working with (not ‘on’) end users can foster shared decision-making, co-creation of knowledge, and ensure that research findings are relevant, actionable, and responsive to the needs of those directly impacted (Reupert et al., 2018). Research with a beneficial social impact often scales up successful interventions or solutions, and assesses their impact on a larger population. Evaluating an intervention during the scaling-up process provides an opportunity to identify necessary adaptations or modifications and where different contexts may require adjustments to the intervention to ensure its suitability and effectiveness (Chambers et al., 2013). This stance results in research that has a broad population reach with long term impacts, especially if trailed solutions can be embedded into routine organisational procedures such as client intake forms (Ward et al., 2017). The effective translation and dissemination of research can help bridge the gap between research findings and their application to policy and practice and hence have a positive social impact. Journals play a key part in this process and where the peer review process helps maintain high standards and credibility (Reupert, 2021). Journal articles can also help create networks of references and citations, linking related research articles together. The international scope of this journal allows researchers from different countries and regions to access and engage in research, and foster academic dialogue. The video abstracts, that this j
{"title":"Research that results in positive social change","authors":"Andrea Reupert","doi":"10.1080/18387357.2023.2232615","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18387357.2023.2232615","url":null,"abstract":"We already know that ‘good’ research is characterised by rigour, adherence to ethical principles, and an objective, systematic approach to knowledge generation. But what do we mean when we consider research that is good because of its social impact and its beneficial impact on others? In the first instance, research that attests to having a social impact needs to address societal needs and challenges (Reupert, 2018). This means that research questions need to be formulated that directly contribute to improving the wellbeing and quality of life of individuals and communities. Much research has already identified healthcare disparities, the experiences of marginalised groups, and those societal and organisational structures that create inequalities. Likewise, research conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic confirmed the significant health care gaps and the health inequalities of certain population groups that have existed for some time (Berger & Reupert, 2020). I would argue that we already know enough about those groups who are most at risk for their mental health; what we need is research that highlights those systems, interventions and structures that help people, families and communities obtain and maintain access to basic social needs and maintain wellbeing. To identify such approaches, research can be conducted that engages with key stakeholders such as those with lived experience and their families, policymakers, practitioners, and advocacy groups. Working with (not ‘on’) end users can foster shared decision-making, co-creation of knowledge, and ensure that research findings are relevant, actionable, and responsive to the needs of those directly impacted (Reupert et al., 2018). Research with a beneficial social impact often scales up successful interventions or solutions, and assesses their impact on a larger population. Evaluating an intervention during the scaling-up process provides an opportunity to identify necessary adaptations or modifications and where different contexts may require adjustments to the intervention to ensure its suitability and effectiveness (Chambers et al., 2013). This stance results in research that has a broad population reach with long term impacts, especially if trailed solutions can be embedded into routine organisational procedures such as client intake forms (Ward et al., 2017). The effective translation and dissemination of research can help bridge the gap between research findings and their application to policy and practice and hence have a positive social impact. Journals play a key part in this process and where the peer review process helps maintain high standards and credibility (Reupert, 2021). Journal articles can also help create networks of references and citations, linking related research articles together. The international scope of this journal allows researchers from different countries and regions to access and engage in research, and foster academic dialogue. The video abstracts, that this j","PeriodicalId":51720,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Mental Health","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134969615","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-01DOI: 10.1080/18387357.2023.2248300
Rie Ueno, Hirokazu Osada
{"title":"Routine identification of children of adults with mental illness: a nationwide survey of healthcare practitioners’ perspectives and practices in Japan","authors":"Rie Ueno, Hirokazu Osada","doi":"10.1080/18387357.2023.2248300","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18387357.2023.2248300","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51720,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Mental Health","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74239095","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-31DOI: 10.1080/18387357.2023.2250885
S. Guthrie, P. Leslie
{"title":"‘We didn’t realise how much we needed you'. Speech and language therapy provision in adult mental health settings","authors":"S. Guthrie, P. Leslie","doi":"10.1080/18387357.2023.2250885","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18387357.2023.2250885","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51720,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Mental Health","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86363430","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-22DOI: 10.1080/18387357.2023.2248299
Christopher Dietzel, B. Bello, Brittany O’Shea, Jessie Cullum, M. Numer
{"title":"Mental health of LGBTQ+ people during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review","authors":"Christopher Dietzel, B. Bello, Brittany O’Shea, Jessie Cullum, M. Numer","doi":"10.1080/18387357.2023.2248299","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18387357.2023.2248299","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51720,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Mental Health","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80361330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-20DOI: 10.1080/18387357.2023.2249556
Laura Allam, J. Binnie
Objective: Previous research has highlighted men and women from black ethnic groups are more likely to be diagnosed with poor mental health and may have difficulty recognising experiences as such, due to perceptions of stigma and culturally defined attributions of distress. The aim of this research was to explore how black ethnic groups experience mental distress and find meaning in their experiences according to cultural heritage. Method: Semi-structured interviews with four participants and an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis were conducted. Results: Findings describe an awareness of cultural stigma relating to mental health, emotional distance impacting disclosure within the family, mental health as a misunderstood concept and feelings of empowerment through acceptance and supported disclosure. Whilst cultural heritage was important for developing awareness and understanding of stigma, attributed meanings of mental distress were individualistic. Discussion: Awareness of how stigmatic cultural conceptualisations are generationally represented and systemically maintained is vital to understanding how people from black ethnic groups experience mental distress. Clinical implications are discussed to explore how the socio-cultural and mental health needs of this population can be met.
{"title":"Lived experience of mental distress and sense-making in black ethnic groups according to cultural heritage","authors":"Laura Allam, J. Binnie","doi":"10.1080/18387357.2023.2249556","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18387357.2023.2249556","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Previous research has highlighted men and women from black ethnic groups are more likely to be diagnosed with poor mental health and may have difficulty recognising experiences as such, due to perceptions of stigma and culturally defined attributions of distress. The aim of this research was to explore how black ethnic groups experience mental distress and find meaning in their experiences according to cultural heritage. Method: Semi-structured interviews with four participants and an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis were conducted. Results: Findings describe an awareness of cultural stigma relating to mental health, emotional distance impacting disclosure within the family, mental health as a misunderstood concept and feelings of empowerment through acceptance and supported disclosure. Whilst cultural heritage was important for developing awareness and understanding of stigma, attributed meanings of mental distress were individualistic. Discussion: Awareness of how stigmatic cultural conceptualisations are generationally represented and systemically maintained is vital to understanding how people from black ethnic groups experience mental distress. Clinical implications are discussed to explore how the socio-cultural and mental health needs of this population can be met.","PeriodicalId":51720,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Mental Health","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83582402","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-26DOI: 10.1080/18387357.2023.2237135
Gabrielle Saad, Anne Honey, Peter Schaecken, J. Scanlan
{"title":"Strategies and supports used by mental health peer workers to facilitate role performance and satisfaction","authors":"Gabrielle Saad, Anne Honey, Peter Schaecken, J. Scanlan","doi":"10.1080/18387357.2023.2237135","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18387357.2023.2237135","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51720,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Mental Health","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79314545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：