Pub Date : 2023-10-01DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_88_23
Deepak Nandkishore Sharma, V. Yerramneni, Madhur K. Srivastava, Thirumal Yerragunta, Sasank Akurati
Objective: Low back pain (LBP) is a major cause of pain and disability. Identification of the pathology accurately or the pain generators is sometimes difficult with the conventional modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), or X-ray. Nuclear medicine investigations such as single-photon emission CT (SPECT/CT) or 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-CT (18-FDG PET-CT) have emerged as an adjuvant tool in these cases. In this study, we evaluated and analyzed the role of 18-FDG PET-CT in identifying active pain generators and the outcomes of interventions based on that compared to MRI. Methodology: This study included all patients who fell under inclusion criteria presented with chronic LBP with or without radiculopathy. History and clinical examination were done as well as Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were calculated. All the patients underwent MRI lumbosacral spine with sacroiliac (SI) joint and 18-FDG PET-CT whole spine. Patients in whom PET-CT was positive and active pain generator was identified were managed for the specific level or pain generator responsible by appropriate modalities, i.e. surgery, interfacetal injections, transforaminal epidural injections, and SI joint injections. Patients in whom PET-CT was negative were managed according to the pain generator identified on the basis of MRI and clinical correlation. Patients were told to follow-up after 1 week and 1 month, and subsequent improvement was evaluated on the basis of VAS after 1 week and 1 month and ODI score after 1 month. Results: A total of 20 patients were included in the study, with a mean age of 41.9 ± 13.53 years. Twelve patients had multiple level pathology without the indication of significant pain generator and eight patients' symptoms did not correlate with the MRI findings. 18-FDG PET-CT was done in all patients. 10% (2/20) patients were identified with active pain generators on PET-CT which were not identified on MRI. Eleven out of twenty patients underwent intervention in the form of surgery or pain injections. The mean VAS and ODI score in the patients intervened on the basis of 18-FDG PET-CT improved by 70.59% and 50%, respectively, whereas in patients who underwent intervention on the basis of MRI had improvement in mean VAS and ODI score by 58.57% and 30.81%, respectively after 1 month. Conclusion: Inflammation and associated degenerative process in the spine is a continuous process and affects multiple levels and might not be easily picked up on MRI or other conventional modalities. Thus, 18-FDG PET-CT is useful in identifying these active inflammatory processes and thereby helping in the localization of active pain generators. Treating these active pain generators has a better outcome in patients after intervention in terms of better pain relief and quality of life and also reduces the levels being treated.
目的:腰背痛(LBP)是导致疼痛和残疾的主要原因。采用磁共振成像(MRI)、计算机断层扫描(CT)或 X 光等传统模式有时难以准确识别病理或疼痛产生原因。单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT/CT)或 18 氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射计算机断层扫描(18-FDG PET-CT)等核医学检查已成为这类病例的辅助工具。在本研究中,我们评估并分析了 18-FDG PET-CT 在识别活动性疼痛发生器方面的作用,以及与核磁共振成像相比,在此基础上进行干预的结果。研究方法:本研究纳入了所有符合纳入标准的慢性腰椎间盘突出症(伴有或不伴有根病变)患者。研究人员对患者进行了病史和临床检查,并计算了视觉模拟量表(VAS)和Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)的评分。所有患者均接受了腰骶部和骶髂关节核磁共振成像(MRI)和全脊柱 18-FDG PET-CT 检查。对于 PET-CT 呈阳性且确定有活动性疼痛源的患者,将通过适当的方式(即手术、椎间孔注射、经椎管硬膜外注射和 SI 关节注射)对其特定水平或疼痛源进行治疗。PET-CT 结果为阴性的患者则根据核磁共振成像和临床相关性确定的疼痛发生器进行治疗。患者会被告知在一周后和一个月后进行随访,并根据一周后和一个月后的 VAS 以及一个月后的 ODI 评分来评估随后的改善情况。结果:本研究共纳入 20 名患者,平均年龄(41.9±13.53)岁。12名患者有多层次病变,但没有明显的疼痛发生器迹象,8名患者的症状与核磁共振成像结果不相关。所有患者都进行了 18-FDG PET-CT。10%(2/20)的患者在 PET-CT 上发现了活动性疼痛发生器,而核磁共振成像却没有发现。二十名患者中有十一名接受了手术或疼痛注射干预。根据 18-FDG PET-CT 进行干预的患者的平均 VAS 和 ODI 评分在 1 个月后分别改善了 70.59% 和 50%,而根据 MRI 进行干预的患者的平均 VAS 和 ODI 评分在 1 个月后分别改善了 58.57% 和 30.81%。结论脊柱的炎症和相关退行性病变是一个持续的过程,影响多个层面,可能不容易被磁共振成像或其他常规方法发现。因此,18-FDG PET-CT 有助于识别这些活跃的炎症过程,从而帮助定位活跃的疼痛发生器。对这些活动性疼痛发生器进行治疗,可使干预后的患者在疼痛缓解和生活质量方面获得更好的结果,同时还能降低治疗水平。
{"title":"Role of magnetic resonance imaging and 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography in identifying pain generators in patients with chronic low back pain","authors":"Deepak Nandkishore Sharma, V. Yerramneni, Madhur K. Srivastava, Thirumal Yerragunta, Sasank Akurati","doi":"10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_88_23","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_88_23","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Low back pain (LBP) is a major cause of pain and disability. Identification of the pathology accurately or the pain generators is sometimes difficult with the conventional modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), or X-ray. Nuclear medicine investigations such as single-photon emission CT (SPECT/CT) or 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-CT (18-FDG PET-CT) have emerged as an adjuvant tool in these cases. In this study, we evaluated and analyzed the role of 18-FDG PET-CT in identifying active pain generators and the outcomes of interventions based on that compared to MRI. Methodology: This study included all patients who fell under inclusion criteria presented with chronic LBP with or without radiculopathy. History and clinical examination were done as well as Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were calculated. All the patients underwent MRI lumbosacral spine with sacroiliac (SI) joint and 18-FDG PET-CT whole spine. Patients in whom PET-CT was positive and active pain generator was identified were managed for the specific level or pain generator responsible by appropriate modalities, i.e. surgery, interfacetal injections, transforaminal epidural injections, and SI joint injections. Patients in whom PET-CT was negative were managed according to the pain generator identified on the basis of MRI and clinical correlation. Patients were told to follow-up after 1 week and 1 month, and subsequent improvement was evaluated on the basis of VAS after 1 week and 1 month and ODI score after 1 month. Results: A total of 20 patients were included in the study, with a mean age of 41.9 ± 13.53 years. Twelve patients had multiple level pathology without the indication of significant pain generator and eight patients' symptoms did not correlate with the MRI findings. 18-FDG PET-CT was done in all patients. 10% (2/20) patients were identified with active pain generators on PET-CT which were not identified on MRI. Eleven out of twenty patients underwent intervention in the form of surgery or pain injections. The mean VAS and ODI score in the patients intervened on the basis of 18-FDG PET-CT improved by 70.59% and 50%, respectively, whereas in patients who underwent intervention on the basis of MRI had improvement in mean VAS and ODI score by 58.57% and 30.81%, respectively after 1 month. Conclusion: Inflammation and associated degenerative process in the spine is a continuous process and affects multiple levels and might not be easily picked up on MRI or other conventional modalities. Thus, 18-FDG PET-CT is useful in identifying these active inflammatory processes and thereby helping in the localization of active pain generators. Treating these active pain generators has a better outcome in patients after intervention in terms of better pain relief and quality of life and also reduces the levels being treated.","PeriodicalId":51721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139331244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-01Epub Date: 2023-11-29DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_112_23
Salim M Yakdan, Jacob K Greenberg, Ajit A Krishnaney, Thomas E Mroz, Alexander Spiessberger
Context: Anterior craniocervical junction lesions have always been a challenge for neurosurgeons. Presenting with lower cranial nerve dysfunction and symptoms of brainstem compression, decompression is often required. While posterior approaches offer indirect ventral brainstem decompression, direct decompression via odontoidectomy is necessary when they fail. The transoral and endoscopic endonasal approaches have been explored but come with their own limitations and risks. A novel retropharyngeal approach to the cervical spine has shown promising results with reduced complications.
Aims: This study aims to explore the feasibility and potential advantages of the anterior retropharyngeal approach for accessing the odontoid process.
Methods and surgical technique: To investigate the anatomical aspects of the anterior retropharyngeal approach, a paramedian skin incision was performed below the submandibular gland on two cadaveric specimens. The subcutaneous tissue followed by the platysma is dissected, and the superficial fascial layer is opened. The plane between the vascular sheath laterally and the pharyngeal structures medially is entered below the branching point of the facial vein and internal jugular vein. After reaching the prevertebral plane, further dissection cranially is done in a blunt fashion below the superior pharyngeal nerve and artery. Various anatomical aspects were highlighted during this approach.
Results: The anterior, submandibular retropharyngeal approach to the cervical spine was performed successfully on two cadavers highlighting relevant anatomical structures, including the carotid artery and the glossopharyngeal, hypoglossal, and vagus nerves. This approach offered wide exposure, avoidance of oropharyngeal contamination, and potential benefit in repairing cerebrospinal fluid fistulas.
Conclusions: For accessing the craniocervical junction, the anterior retropharyngeal approach is a viable technique that offers many advantages. However, when employing this approach, surgeons must have adequate anatomical knowledge and technical proficiency to ensure better outcomes. Further studies are needed to enhance our anatomical variations understanding and reduce intraoperative risks.
{"title":"Transcervical, retropharyngeal odontoidectomy - Anatomical considerations.","authors":"Salim M Yakdan, Jacob K Greenberg, Ajit A Krishnaney, Thomas E Mroz, Alexander Spiessberger","doi":"10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_112_23","DOIUrl":"10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_112_23","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Anterior craniocervical junction lesions have always been a challenge for neurosurgeons. Presenting with lower cranial nerve dysfunction and symptoms of brainstem compression, decompression is often required. While posterior approaches offer indirect ventral brainstem decompression, direct decompression via odontoidectomy is necessary when they fail. The transoral and endoscopic endonasal approaches have been explored but come with their own limitations and risks. A novel retropharyngeal approach to the cervical spine has shown promising results with reduced complications.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to explore the feasibility and potential advantages of the anterior retropharyngeal approach for accessing the odontoid process.</p><p><strong>Methods and surgical technique: </strong>To investigate the anatomical aspects of the anterior retropharyngeal approach, a paramedian skin incision was performed below the submandibular gland on two cadaveric specimens. The subcutaneous tissue followed by the platysma is dissected, and the superficial fascial layer is opened. The plane between the vascular sheath laterally and the pharyngeal structures medially is entered below the branching point of the facial vein and internal jugular vein. After reaching the prevertebral plane, further dissection cranially is done in a blunt fashion below the superior pharyngeal nerve and artery. Various anatomical aspects were highlighted during this approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The anterior, submandibular retropharyngeal approach to the cervical spine was performed successfully on two cadavers highlighting relevant anatomical structures, including the carotid artery and the glossopharyngeal, hypoglossal, and vagus nerves. This approach offered wide exposure, avoidance of oropharyngeal contamination, and potential benefit in repairing cerebrospinal fluid fistulas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For accessing the craniocervical junction, the anterior retropharyngeal approach is a viable technique that offers many advantages. However, when employing this approach, surgeons must have adequate anatomical knowledge and technical proficiency to ensure better outcomes. Further studies are needed to enhance our anatomical variations understanding and reduce intraoperative risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":51721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10805156/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139547553","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-01DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_117_23
Matthieu D Weber, Guilherme Finger, Vikas Munjal, Kyle C Wu, Basit A. Jawad, Asad S. Akhter, Vikram B. Chakravarthy, R. Carrau, D. Prevedello
Background and Objectives: Odontoidectomy is a surgical procedure indicated in the setting of various pathologies, with the main goal of decompressing the ventral brain stem and spinal cord as a result of irreducible compression at the craniovertebral junction. The endoscopic endonasal approach has been increasingly used as an alternative to the transoral approach as it provides a straightforward, panoramic, and direct approach to the odontoid process. In addition, intraoperative ultrasound (US) guidance is a technique that can optimize safety and surgical outcomes in this context. It is used as an adjunct to neuronavigation and provides intraoperative confirmation of decompression of craniovertebral junction structures in real time. The authors aim to present the use and safe application of real-time intraoperative US guidance during endonasal endoscopic resection of a retro-odontoid pannus. Methods: A retrospective chart review of a single case was performed and presented herein as a case report and narrated operative video. Results: A minimally invasive US transducer was used intraoperatively to guide the resection of a retro-odontoid pannus and confirm spinal cord decompression in real time. Postoperative examination of the patient revealed immediate neurological improvement. Conclusions: Intraoperative ultrasonography is a well described and useful modality in neurosurgery. However, the use of intraoperative US guidance during endonasal endoscopic approaches to the craniovertebral junction has not been previously described. As demonstrated in this technical note, the authors show that this imaging modality can be added to the ever-evolving armamentarium of neurosurgeons to safely guide the decompression of neural structures within the craniocervical junction with good surgical outcomes.
{"title":"Real-time ultrasound guidance in the endoscopic endonasal resection of a retro-odontoid pannus: Technical note and case illustration","authors":"Matthieu D Weber, Guilherme Finger, Vikas Munjal, Kyle C Wu, Basit A. Jawad, Asad S. Akhter, Vikram B. Chakravarthy, R. Carrau, D. Prevedello","doi":"10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_117_23","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_117_23","url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objectives: Odontoidectomy is a surgical procedure indicated in the setting of various pathologies, with the main goal of decompressing the ventral brain stem and spinal cord as a result of irreducible compression at the craniovertebral junction. The endoscopic endonasal approach has been increasingly used as an alternative to the transoral approach as it provides a straightforward, panoramic, and direct approach to the odontoid process. In addition, intraoperative ultrasound (US) guidance is a technique that can optimize safety and surgical outcomes in this context. It is used as an adjunct to neuronavigation and provides intraoperative confirmation of decompression of craniovertebral junction structures in real time. The authors aim to present the use and safe application of real-time intraoperative US guidance during endonasal endoscopic resection of a retro-odontoid pannus. Methods: A retrospective chart review of a single case was performed and presented herein as a case report and narrated operative video. Results: A minimally invasive US transducer was used intraoperatively to guide the resection of a retro-odontoid pannus and confirm spinal cord decompression in real time. Postoperative examination of the patient revealed immediate neurological improvement. Conclusions: Intraoperative ultrasonography is a well described and useful modality in neurosurgery. However, the use of intraoperative US guidance during endonasal endoscopic approaches to the craniovertebral junction has not been previously described. As demonstrated in this technical note, the authors show that this imaging modality can be added to the ever-evolving armamentarium of neurosurgeons to safely guide the decompression of neural structures within the craniocervical junction with good surgical outcomes.","PeriodicalId":51721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139327911","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-01DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_39_23
Bhavya Pahwa, Anish Tayal, Dhiman Chowdhury, G. Umana, Bipin Chaurasia
Objective: We conducted a cross-sectional study to assess the preference of spine surgeons between MD for microdiscectomy and endoscopic discectomy (ED) surgery for the management of lumbar pathologies in a lower-middle-income country (LMIC). Methodology: An online survey assessing the preference of spine surgeons for various lumbar pathologies was developed and disseminated in “Neurosurgery Cocktail” a social media platform. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software with a level of significance <0.05. Results: We received responses from 160 spine surgeons having a median experience of 6.75 years (range 0–42 years) after residency. Most of the spine surgeons preferred MD over ED, preference being homogeneous across all lumbar pathologies. In ED, the interlaminar approach was preferred more frequently than the transforaminal approach. The most commonly chosen contraindication for the interlaminar approach and transforaminal approach was ≥ 3 levels lumbar disc herniation (LDH) (n = 117, 73.1%) and calcified LDH (n = 102, 63.8%), respectively. There was no significant association between the type of approach preferred (MD vs. ED; and interlaminar vs. translaminar endoscopic approach) with the type of workplace and the level of experience. Conclusion: Spine surgeons were inclined toward MD over ED, due to various reasons, such as a steep learning curve, lack of training opportunities, and upfront expenses. There is a pressing need for the upliftment of ED in LMICs which requires global action.
{"title":"Endoscopic versus microscopic discectomy for pathologies of lumbar spine: A nationwide cross-sectional study from a lower-middle-income country","authors":"Bhavya Pahwa, Anish Tayal, Dhiman Chowdhury, G. Umana, Bipin Chaurasia","doi":"10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_39_23","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_39_23","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: We conducted a cross-sectional study to assess the preference of spine surgeons between MD for microdiscectomy and endoscopic discectomy (ED) surgery for the management of lumbar pathologies in a lower-middle-income country (LMIC). Methodology: An online survey assessing the preference of spine surgeons for various lumbar pathologies was developed and disseminated in “Neurosurgery Cocktail” a social media platform. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software with a level of significance <0.05. Results: We received responses from 160 spine surgeons having a median experience of 6.75 years (range 0–42 years) after residency. Most of the spine surgeons preferred MD over ED, preference being homogeneous across all lumbar pathologies. In ED, the interlaminar approach was preferred more frequently than the transforaminal approach. The most commonly chosen contraindication for the interlaminar approach and transforaminal approach was ≥ 3 levels lumbar disc herniation (LDH) (n = 117, 73.1%) and calcified LDH (n = 102, 63.8%), respectively. There was no significant association between the type of approach preferred (MD vs. ED; and interlaminar vs. translaminar endoscopic approach) with the type of workplace and the level of experience. Conclusion: Spine surgeons were inclined toward MD over ED, due to various reasons, such as a steep learning curve, lack of training opportunities, and upfront expenses. There is a pressing need for the upliftment of ED in LMICs which requires global action.","PeriodicalId":51721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139330319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-01DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_121_23
Andreas K. Demetriades, J. Tiefenbach, Jay J. Park, Mohammed Ma'arij Anwar, Sara Manzoor Raza
Purpose: Substandard quality across published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is a major concern. Imperfect reporting has the potential to distort the evidence landscape and waste valuable health-care resources. In this study, we aim to assess the current quality of reporting in the field of spine using a modified version of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist. Materials and Methods: A list of published RCTs in the field of spine disease from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2020, was built. Two reviewers scored the published RCTs against a modified CONSORT checklist. The mean adjusted CONSORT scores for each study, reporting category, and checklist item were calculated. Results: The mean and median scores across all of the RCTs were 0.72 and 0.74 out of 1.00, respectively. The spectrum of scores was wide, ranging from 0.45 to 0.94. The reporting categories with the lowest score included randomization, blinding, and abstract. The items which were most under-reported included allocation sequence generation, type of randomization used, full trial protocol details, and abstract methodology. The inter-rater reliability between our reviewers was substantial (κ = 0.7, κ = 0.71). Conclusion: Our findings correlate with only a moderate level of compliance to the CONSORT criteria on the quality of reporting for RCTs in spinal conditions. This is in line with previous reports on compliance, both within and outside the field of spinal conditions. Further continued and sustained efforts are still required to enhance the quality and consistency of RCT reporting, ultimately reducing health-care resource wastage and improving patient safety.
{"title":"What is the quality of reporting in randomized controlled trials in spinal conditions","authors":"Andreas K. Demetriades, J. Tiefenbach, Jay J. Park, Mohammed Ma'arij Anwar, Sara Manzoor Raza","doi":"10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_121_23","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_121_23","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Substandard quality across published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is a major concern. Imperfect reporting has the potential to distort the evidence landscape and waste valuable health-care resources. In this study, we aim to assess the current quality of reporting in the field of spine using a modified version of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist. Materials and Methods: A list of published RCTs in the field of spine disease from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2020, was built. Two reviewers scored the published RCTs against a modified CONSORT checklist. The mean adjusted CONSORT scores for each study, reporting category, and checklist item were calculated. Results: The mean and median scores across all of the RCTs were 0.72 and 0.74 out of 1.00, respectively. The spectrum of scores was wide, ranging from 0.45 to 0.94. The reporting categories with the lowest score included randomization, blinding, and abstract. The items which were most under-reported included allocation sequence generation, type of randomization used, full trial protocol details, and abstract methodology. The inter-rater reliability between our reviewers was substantial (κ = 0.7, κ = 0.71). Conclusion: Our findings correlate with only a moderate level of compliance to the CONSORT criteria on the quality of reporting for RCTs in spinal conditions. This is in line with previous reports on compliance, both within and outside the field of spinal conditions. Further continued and sustained efforts are still required to enhance the quality and consistency of RCT reporting, ultimately reducing health-care resource wastage and improving patient safety.","PeriodicalId":51721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139326140","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-01DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_151_23
Atul Goel, Apurva Prasad, A. Shah, Shradha Maheshwari, Ravikiran Vutha
Aim: The rationale of “only fixation” of affected spinal segments without any form of bone or soft-tissue decompression in cases with failed decompressive laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis is discussed on the basis of an experience with 14 cases. Materials and Methods: During the period between 2010 and 2022, 14 patients who symptomatically worsened or did not improve following a long-segment “wide” decompressive laminectomy for multisegmental lumbar canal stenosis were identified. All patients were treated by segmental spinal stabilization aimed at arthrodesis by facetal distraction by Goel's facetal spacers (6 cases) or Camille's transarticular facetal fixation (8 cases). No bone, soft tissue, or disc resection was done for spinal or neural canal “decompression.” Oswestry Disability Index and Visual Analog Scale were used to clinically assess the patients before and after the surgery and at follow-up. In addition, video recordings of patient's self-assessment of clinical outcome were used to monitor the outcome. Results: During the average period of follow-up of 71 months (range 6 months to 16 years), all patients recovered in majority of their major symptoms, the recovery was observed in the immediate postoperative period. During the period of follow-up, none of the patients complained of recurrent symptoms or needed any additional surgery. There was firm stabilization and evidences of bone fusion of the treated spinal segments in all patients. There were no infections or implant failure. No patient worsened after treatment. Conclusions: Instability of the spinal segments is the primary issue in cases with lumbar canal stenosis and stabilization in the treatment.
{"title":"”Only fixation” in cases with failed decompression for lumbar canal stenosis – Analysis of outcome in 14 cases","authors":"Atul Goel, Apurva Prasad, A. Shah, Shradha Maheshwari, Ravikiran Vutha","doi":"10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_151_23","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_151_23","url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The rationale of “only fixation” of affected spinal segments without any form of bone or soft-tissue decompression in cases with failed decompressive laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis is discussed on the basis of an experience with 14 cases. Materials and Methods: During the period between 2010 and 2022, 14 patients who symptomatically worsened or did not improve following a long-segment “wide” decompressive laminectomy for multisegmental lumbar canal stenosis were identified. All patients were treated by segmental spinal stabilization aimed at arthrodesis by facetal distraction by Goel's facetal spacers (6 cases) or Camille's transarticular facetal fixation (8 cases). No bone, soft tissue, or disc resection was done for spinal or neural canal “decompression.” Oswestry Disability Index and Visual Analog Scale were used to clinically assess the patients before and after the surgery and at follow-up. In addition, video recordings of patient's self-assessment of clinical outcome were used to monitor the outcome. Results: During the average period of follow-up of 71 months (range 6 months to 16 years), all patients recovered in majority of their major symptoms, the recovery was observed in the immediate postoperative period. During the period of follow-up, none of the patients complained of recurrent symptoms or needed any additional surgery. There was firm stabilization and evidences of bone fusion of the treated spinal segments in all patients. There were no infections or implant failure. No patient worsened after treatment. Conclusions: Instability of the spinal segments is the primary issue in cases with lumbar canal stenosis and stabilization in the treatment.","PeriodicalId":51721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139329086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-01DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_126_23
M. Cloney, P. Texakalidis, Anastasios G Roumeliotis, N. Tecle, N. Dahdaleh
Background: Patients with simultaneous fractures of the atlas and dens have traditionally been managed according to the dens fracture's morphology, but data supporting this practice are limited. Methods: We retrospectively examined all patients with traumatic atlas fractures at our institution between 2008 and 2016. We used multivariable regression and propensity score matching to compare the presentation, management, and outcomes of patients with isolated atlas fractures to patients with simultaneous atlas-dens fractures. Results: Ninety-nine patients were identified. Patients with isolated atlas fractures were younger (61 ± 22 vs. 77 ± 14, P = 0.0003), had lower median Charlson Comorbidity Index (3 vs. 5, P = 0.0005), had better presenting Nurick myelopathy scores (0 vs. 3, P < 0.0001), and had different mechanisms of injury (P = 0.0011). Multivariable regression showed that having a simultaneous atlas-dens fracture was independently associated with older age (odds ratio [OR] =1.59 [1.22, 2.07], P = 0.001), worse presenting myelopathy (OR = 3.10 [2.04, 4.16], P < 0.001), and selection for surgery (OR = 4.91 [1.10, 21.97], P = 0.037). Propensity score matching yielded balanced populations (Rubin's B = 23.3, Rubin's R = 1.96) and showed that the risk of atlas fracture nonunion was no different among isolated atlas fractures compared to simultaneous atlas-dens fractures (P = 0.304). Age was the only variable independently associated with atlas fracture nonunion (OR = 2.39 [1.15, 5.00], P = 0.020), having a simultaneous atlas-dens fracture was not significant (P = 0.2829). Conclusions: Among patients with atlas fractures, simultaneous fractures of the dens occur in older patients and confer an increased risk of myelopathy and requiring surgical stabilization. Controlling for confounders, the risk of atlas fracture nonunion is equivalent for isolated atlas fractures versus simultaneous atlas-dens fractures.
{"title":"Atlas fractures with and without simultaneous dens fractures differ with respect to clinical, demographic, and management characteristics","authors":"M. Cloney, P. Texakalidis, Anastasios G Roumeliotis, N. Tecle, N. Dahdaleh","doi":"10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_126_23","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_126_23","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patients with simultaneous fractures of the atlas and dens have traditionally been managed according to the dens fracture's morphology, but data supporting this practice are limited. Methods: We retrospectively examined all patients with traumatic atlas fractures at our institution between 2008 and 2016. We used multivariable regression and propensity score matching to compare the presentation, management, and outcomes of patients with isolated atlas fractures to patients with simultaneous atlas-dens fractures. Results: Ninety-nine patients were identified. Patients with isolated atlas fractures were younger (61 ± 22 vs. 77 ± 14, P = 0.0003), had lower median Charlson Comorbidity Index (3 vs. 5, P = 0.0005), had better presenting Nurick myelopathy scores (0 vs. 3, P < 0.0001), and had different mechanisms of injury (P = 0.0011). Multivariable regression showed that having a simultaneous atlas-dens fracture was independently associated with older age (odds ratio [OR] =1.59 [1.22, 2.07], P = 0.001), worse presenting myelopathy (OR = 3.10 [2.04, 4.16], P < 0.001), and selection for surgery (OR = 4.91 [1.10, 21.97], P = 0.037). Propensity score matching yielded balanced populations (Rubin's B = 23.3, Rubin's R = 1.96) and showed that the risk of atlas fracture nonunion was no different among isolated atlas fractures compared to simultaneous atlas-dens fractures (P = 0.304). Age was the only variable independently associated with atlas fracture nonunion (OR = 2.39 [1.15, 5.00], P = 0.020), having a simultaneous atlas-dens fracture was not significant (P = 0.2829). Conclusions: Among patients with atlas fractures, simultaneous fractures of the dens occur in older patients and confer an increased risk of myelopathy and requiring surgical stabilization. Controlling for confounders, the risk of atlas fracture nonunion is equivalent for isolated atlas fractures versus simultaneous atlas-dens fractures.","PeriodicalId":51721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139328229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-01DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_84_23
Ryokichi Yagi, Masao Fukumura, Naoki Omura, R. Hiramatsu, Masahiro Kameda, N. Nonoguchi, M. Furuse, Shinji Kawabata, Toshihiro Takami, M. Wanibuchi
Background: In the cervical nerve sheath tumor (NST) surgery with dumbbell extension of Eden type 2 or 3, selection of anterior, posterior, or combined approach remains controversial. Objectives: This technical note aimed to propose possible advantages of the posterior unilateral approach (PUA). Methods: Six patients who underwent the surgical treatment of cervical NSTs with dumbbell extension of Eden type 2 or 3 were included. The critical surgical steps included (1) complete separation of extradural and intradural procedures, (2) careful peeling of the neural membranes (epineurium and perineurium) from the tumor surface in the extradural procedure, (3) complete removal of the extradural tumor within the neural membranes, (4) intradural disconnection of tumor origin, and (5) intentional tumor removal up to the vertebral artery (VA), i.e., the VA line. Results: The tumor location of dumbbell extension was Eden types 2 and 3 in two and four patients. Gross total resection was achieved in two patients and intentional posterior removal of the tumor to the VA line was achieved in the remaining four patients. No vascular or neural injuries associated with surgical procedures occurred. Postoperative neurological assessment revealed no symptomatic aggravation in all patients. No secondary surgery was performed during the study period. Conclusion: PUA was safe and less invasive for functional recovery and tumor resection, if the anatomical relationship between the tumor and VA is clearly understood. The VA line is an important anatomical landmark to limit the extent of tumor resection.
背景:在伊登 2 型或 3 型哑铃状扩展的颈神经鞘瘤(NST)手术中,选择前路、后路还是联合入路仍存在争议。目的:本技术说明旨在提出后路单侧入路(PUA)可能具有的优势。方法:纳入了六名接受手术治疗的伊登 2 型或 3 型哑铃伸展型颈椎 NST 患者。手术的关键步骤包括:(1)硬膜外和硬膜内手术完全分离;(2)在硬膜外手术中仔细剥离肿瘤表面的神经膜(外膜和会厌);(3)完全切除神经膜内的硬膜外肿瘤;(4)硬膜内肿瘤起源断开;(5)有意将肿瘤切除至椎动脉(VA),即 VA 线。结果2例和4例患者的哑铃状扩展肿瘤位置为Eden 2型和3型。两名患者实现了肿瘤全切,其余四名患者实现了肿瘤后方至 VA 线的有意切除。手术过程中未出现血管或神经损伤。术后神经评估显示,所有患者均无症状加重。研究期间没有进行二次手术。结论如果清楚地了解肿瘤与VA之间的解剖关系,PUA对于功能恢复和肿瘤切除是安全的,创伤也较小。VA线是限制肿瘤切除范围的重要解剖标志。
{"title":"Vertebral artery is an anatomical landmark in the posterior unilateral resection of cervical benign nerve sheath tumors with dumbbell extension of Eden type 2 or 3","authors":"Ryokichi Yagi, Masao Fukumura, Naoki Omura, R. Hiramatsu, Masahiro Kameda, N. Nonoguchi, M. Furuse, Shinji Kawabata, Toshihiro Takami, M. Wanibuchi","doi":"10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_84_23","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_84_23","url":null,"abstract":"Background: In the cervical nerve sheath tumor (NST) surgery with dumbbell extension of Eden type 2 or 3, selection of anterior, posterior, or combined approach remains controversial. Objectives: This technical note aimed to propose possible advantages of the posterior unilateral approach (PUA). Methods: Six patients who underwent the surgical treatment of cervical NSTs with dumbbell extension of Eden type 2 or 3 were included. The critical surgical steps included (1) complete separation of extradural and intradural procedures, (2) careful peeling of the neural membranes (epineurium and perineurium) from the tumor surface in the extradural procedure, (3) complete removal of the extradural tumor within the neural membranes, (4) intradural disconnection of tumor origin, and (5) intentional tumor removal up to the vertebral artery (VA), i.e., the VA line. Results: The tumor location of dumbbell extension was Eden types 2 and 3 in two and four patients. Gross total resection was achieved in two patients and intentional posterior removal of the tumor to the VA line was achieved in the remaining four patients. No vascular or neural injuries associated with surgical procedures occurred. Postoperative neurological assessment revealed no symptomatic aggravation in all patients. No secondary surgery was performed during the study period. Conclusion: PUA was safe and less invasive for functional recovery and tumor resection, if the anatomical relationship between the tumor and VA is clearly understood. The VA line is an important anatomical landmark to limit the extent of tumor resection.","PeriodicalId":51721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139331405","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-01DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_97_23
Georgios Mavrovounis, Marios Makris, Andreas K. Demetriades
Study Design: Bibliometric analysis. Objectives: This study aimed to highlight the 200 most influential articles related to traumatic spinal cord and spinal column injuries and provide an insight of past and current global trends in spinal trauma research. Methods: The Web of Science database was used to identify the top 200 most cited articles on the topic of traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) and spinal column injuries between using a prespecified algorithm. The articles were manually reviewed; bibliometrics were collected on title, first and corresponding authors' country, institution, journal, publication year, and citation data. Results: The search string yielded 30,551 articles during 1977–2019. The average time from the publication was 19.5 years. A total of 1356 authors contributed to 67 different journals, the top 200 most cited articles amassing a total of 88,115 citations and an average 440.6 citations. The United States of America (USA) contributed the most with 110 articles; the top institution was the University of Toronto with 34 publications. Most studies focused on basic science research on SCI. Keyword analysis revealed the most commonly used keywords: SCI, inflammation, apoptosis, incidence/prevalence, and regeneration; four word-clusters were identified. Institutions from the USA and Canada collaborated the most and two major and two minor institutional collaboration subnetworks were identified. Co-citation analysis detected three main clusters of authors. Conclusion: This overview of the most cited articles on traumatic spinal cord and spinal column injuries provides insight into the international spinal trauma community and the terrain in this field, potentially acting as a springboard for further collaboration development.
研究设计:文献计量分析。研究目的本研究旨在突出与创伤性脊髓和脊柱损伤相关的 200 篇最有影响力的文章,并深入了解过去和当前全球脊柱创伤研究的趋势。方法:采用 Web of Science 数据库:使用 Web of Science 数据库,按照预先设定的算法,找出外伤性脊髓损伤(SCI)和脊柱损伤主题引用率最高的 200 篇文章。对这些文章进行了人工审核;收集了有关标题、第一作者和通讯作者所在国家、机构、期刊、发表年份和引用数据的文献计量学信息。结果:搜索字符串在 1977-2019 年间共搜索到 30551 篇文章。文章发表的平均时间为 19.5 年。共有 1356 位作者在 67 种不同期刊上发表了文章,被引用次数最多的前 200 篇文章共被引用 88,115 次,平均被引用 440.6 次。美利坚合众国(USA)发表的文章最多,有 110 篇;发表文章最多的机构是多伦多大学,有 34 篇。大多数研究侧重于 SCI 的基础科学研究。关键词分析显示了最常用的关键词:SCI、炎症、细胞凋亡、发病率/流行率和再生;确定了四个词群。来自美国和加拿大的机构合作最多,并确定了两个主要机构合作子网络和两个次要机构合作子网络。联合引用分析发现了三个主要的作者集群。结论这篇关于外伤性脊髓和脊柱损伤的被引次数最多的文章概述提供了对国际脊柱创伤界和该领域情况的深入了解,有可能成为进一步开展合作的跳板。
{"title":"Traumatic spinal cord and spinal column injuries: A bibliometric analysis of the 200 most cited articles","authors":"Georgios Mavrovounis, Marios Makris, Andreas K. Demetriades","doi":"10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_97_23","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_97_23","url":null,"abstract":"Study Design: Bibliometric analysis. Objectives: This study aimed to highlight the 200 most influential articles related to traumatic spinal cord and spinal column injuries and provide an insight of past and current global trends in spinal trauma research. Methods: The Web of Science database was used to identify the top 200 most cited articles on the topic of traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) and spinal column injuries between using a prespecified algorithm. The articles were manually reviewed; bibliometrics were collected on title, first and corresponding authors' country, institution, journal, publication year, and citation data. Results: The search string yielded 30,551 articles during 1977–2019. The average time from the publication was 19.5 years. A total of 1356 authors contributed to 67 different journals, the top 200 most cited articles amassing a total of 88,115 citations and an average 440.6 citations. The United States of America (USA) contributed the most with 110 articles; the top institution was the University of Toronto with 34 publications. Most studies focused on basic science research on SCI. Keyword analysis revealed the most commonly used keywords: SCI, inflammation, apoptosis, incidence/prevalence, and regeneration; four word-clusters were identified. Institutions from the USA and Canada collaborated the most and two major and two minor institutional collaboration subnetworks were identified. Co-citation analysis detected three main clusters of authors. Conclusion: This overview of the most cited articles on traumatic spinal cord and spinal column injuries provides insight into the international spinal trauma community and the terrain in this field, potentially acting as a springboard for further collaboration development.","PeriodicalId":51721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139326834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-01DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_140_23
Oluwatobi O. Onafowokan, Ankita Das, J. Mir, Haddy Alas, T. Williamson, K. McFarland, Jeffrey J. Varghese, Sara A. Naessig, Bailey Imbo, Lara Passfall, O. Krol, P. Tretiakov, Rachel Joujon-Roche, P. Dave, Kevin Moattari, S. Owusu‐Sarpong, J. Lebovic, Shaleen Vira, B. Diebo, V. Lafage, P. Passias
Background: Chiari malformation (CM) is a cluster of related developmental anomalies of the posterior fossa ranging from asymptomatic to fatal. Cranial and spinal decompression can help alleviate symptoms of increased cerebrospinal fluid pressure and correct spinal deformity. As surgical intervention for CM increases in frequency, understanding predictors of reoperation may help optimize neurosurgical planning. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of the prospectively collected Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's California State Inpatient Database years 2004–2011. Chiari malformation Types 1–4 (queried with ICD-9 CM codes) with associated spinal pathologies undergoing stand-alone spinal decompression (queried with ICD-9 CM procedure codes) were included. Cranial decompressions were excluded. Results: One thousand four hundred and forty-six patients (29.28 years, 55.6% of females) were included. Fifty-eight patients (4.01%) required reoperation (67 reoperations). Patients aged 40–50 years had the most reoperations (11); however, patients aged 15–20 years had a significantly higher reoperation rate than all other groups (15.5% vs. 8.2%, P = 0.048). Female gender was significantly associated with reoperation (67.2% vs. 55.6%, P = 0.006). Medical comorbidities associated with reoperation included chronic lung disease (19% vs. 6.9%, P < 0.001), iron deficiency anemia (10.3% vs. 4.1%, P = 0.024), and renal failure (3.4% vs. 0.9%, P = 0.05). Associated significant cluster anomalies included spina bifida (48.3% vs. 34.8%, P = 0.035), tethered cord syndrome (6.9% vs. 2.1%, P = 0.015), syringomyelia (12.1% vs. 5.9%, P = 0.054), hydrocephalus (37.9% vs. 17.7%, P < 0.001), scoliosis (13.8% vs. 6.4%, P = 0.028), and ventricular septal defect (6.9% vs. 2.3%, P = 0.026). Conclusions: Multiple medical and CM-specific comorbidities were associated with reoperation. Addressing them, where possible, may aid in improving CM surgery outcomes.
背景:脊髓脊膜膨出畸形(Chiari malformation,CM)是一组相关的后窝发育异常,轻者无症状,重者可致命。颅脑和脊柱减压术有助于缓解脑脊液压力增高的症状并矫正脊柱畸形。随着手术治疗 CM 的频率增加,了解再手术的预测因素有助于优化神经外科手术计划。材料与方法:这是对前瞻性收集的医疗成本与利用项目加利福尼亚州住院病人数据库(2004-2011 年)进行的回顾性分析。研究对象包括接受独立脊柱减压术(以 ICD-9 CM 手术代码查询)的 1-4 型 Chiari 畸形(以 ICD-9 CM 代码查询)及相关脊柱病变。不包括颅骨减压术。结果:共纳入 1446 名患者(29.28 岁,55.6% 为女性)。58名患者(4.01%)需要再次手术(67次)。年龄在 40-50 岁之间的患者再次手术最多(11 例);然而,年龄在 15-20 岁之间的患者再次手术率明显高于其他所有组别(15.5% 对 8.2%,P = 0.048)。女性性别与再手术率明显相关(67.2% 对 55.6%,P = 0.006)。与再次手术相关的并发症包括慢性肺病(19% 对 6.9%,P < 0.001)、缺铁性贫血(10.3% 对 4.1%,P = 0.024)和肾功能衰竭(3.4% 对 0.9%,P = 0.05)。相关的重大群集异常包括脊柱裂(48.3% vs. 34.8%,P = 0.035)、系带综合征(6.9% vs. 2.1%,P = 0.015)、鞘膜积液(12.1% vs. 5.9%,P = 0.054)、脑积水(37.9% vs. 17.7%,P <0.001)、脊柱侧弯(13.8% vs. 6.4%,P = 0.028)和室间隔缺损(6.9% vs. 2.3%,P = 0.026)。结论多种内科和中枢神经系统特异性合并症与再次手术有关。在可能的情况下,解决这些问题有助于改善 CM 手术的预后。
{"title":"Predictors of reoperation for spinal disorders in Chiari malformation patients with prior surgical decompression","authors":"Oluwatobi O. Onafowokan, Ankita Das, J. Mir, Haddy Alas, T. Williamson, K. McFarland, Jeffrey J. Varghese, Sara A. Naessig, Bailey Imbo, Lara Passfall, O. Krol, P. Tretiakov, Rachel Joujon-Roche, P. Dave, Kevin Moattari, S. Owusu‐Sarpong, J. Lebovic, Shaleen Vira, B. Diebo, V. Lafage, P. Passias","doi":"10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_140_23","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_140_23","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Chiari malformation (CM) is a cluster of related developmental anomalies of the posterior fossa ranging from asymptomatic to fatal. Cranial and spinal decompression can help alleviate symptoms of increased cerebrospinal fluid pressure and correct spinal deformity. As surgical intervention for CM increases in frequency, understanding predictors of reoperation may help optimize neurosurgical planning. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of the prospectively collected Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's California State Inpatient Database years 2004–2011. Chiari malformation Types 1–4 (queried with ICD-9 CM codes) with associated spinal pathologies undergoing stand-alone spinal decompression (queried with ICD-9 CM procedure codes) were included. Cranial decompressions were excluded. Results: One thousand four hundred and forty-six patients (29.28 years, 55.6% of females) were included. Fifty-eight patients (4.01%) required reoperation (67 reoperations). Patients aged 40–50 years had the most reoperations (11); however, patients aged 15–20 years had a significantly higher reoperation rate than all other groups (15.5% vs. 8.2%, P = 0.048). Female gender was significantly associated with reoperation (67.2% vs. 55.6%, P = 0.006). Medical comorbidities associated with reoperation included chronic lung disease (19% vs. 6.9%, P < 0.001), iron deficiency anemia (10.3% vs. 4.1%, P = 0.024), and renal failure (3.4% vs. 0.9%, P = 0.05). Associated significant cluster anomalies included spina bifida (48.3% vs. 34.8%, P = 0.035), tethered cord syndrome (6.9% vs. 2.1%, P = 0.015), syringomyelia (12.1% vs. 5.9%, P = 0.054), hydrocephalus (37.9% vs. 17.7%, P < 0.001), scoliosis (13.8% vs. 6.4%, P = 0.028), and ventricular septal defect (6.9% vs. 2.3%, P = 0.026). Conclusions: Multiple medical and CM-specific comorbidities were associated with reoperation. Addressing them, where possible, may aid in improving CM surgery outcomes.","PeriodicalId":51721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139331385","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}