首页 > 最新文献

History of Psychology最新文献

英文 中文
Interamerican Society of Psychology (1951-2021): Its history and historians. 美洲心理学会(1951-2021):历史与历史学家。
IF 0.5 4区 心理学 Q1 HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI: 10.1037/h0101895
Miguel Gallegos, Viviane de Castro Pecanha

On December 17, 2021, The Interamerican Society of Psychology (ISP) celebrated its 70th anniversary. This article briefly describes ISP's history, discussing its organizational structure, and the contributions of the working group history of psychology, to honor this important event. The history of psychology division within ISP remains committed to facilitating encounters of Ibero American psychologists who wish to further examine the history of psychology. Lastly, we analyzed the growth and the contemporary challenges in the field of history of psychology in Latin America. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

2021年12月17日,美洲心理学会(ISP)庆祝成立70周年。本文简要介绍了心理学工作小组的历史,讨论了其组织结构,以及心理学工作小组历史的贡献,以纪念这一重要事件。ISP内的心理学历史部门仍然致力于促进伊比利亚美洲心理学家的接触,他们希望进一步研究心理学的历史。最后,我们分析了拉丁美洲心理学史领域的发展及其面临的挑战。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Interamerican Society of Psychology (1951-2021): Its history and historians.","authors":"Miguel Gallegos,&nbsp;Viviane de Castro Pecanha","doi":"10.1037/h0101895","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/h0101895","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>On December 17, 2021, The Interamerican Society of Psychology (ISP) celebrated its 70th anniversary. This article briefly describes ISP's history, discussing its organizational structure, and the contributions of the working group history of psychology, to honor this important event. The history of psychology division within ISP remains committed to facilitating encounters of Ibero American psychologists who wish to further examine the history of psychology. Lastly, we analyzed the growth and the contemporary challenges in the field of history of psychology in Latin America. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":51852,"journal":{"name":"History of Psychology","volume":"25 4","pages":"388-395"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10630105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How did early North American clinical psychologists get their first personality test? Carl Gustav Jung, the Zurich School of Psychiatry, and the development of the "Word Association Test" (1898-1909). 早期北美临床心理学家是如何进行第一次人格测试的?卡尔·古斯塔夫·荣格,苏黎世精神病学学院,以及“单词联想测试”的发展(1898-1909)。
IF 0.5 4区 心理学 Q1 HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI: 10.1037/hop0000218
Catriel Fierro

Clinical psychology emerged in the United States during the first decades of the 20th century. Although they focused on intelligence tests, starting around 1905 certain clinical psychologists pursued personality assessment through a specific, nonintellectual kind of test: the word association test as devised by Swiss psychiatrist Carl Gustav Jung (1875-1961) at the Burghölzli psychiatric clinic in Zurich. The test was a key device in the professionalization of North American psychiatry and psychology during the early 20th century: from 1905 onward it was acknowledged, discussed, and applied by experimental and clinical psychologists. However, Jung's original experiments and the development of the test itself have received only superficial or casual attention by historians of science. This article attempts to provide a critical, streamlined, and detailed account on the origin, development, and substance of the Zurich word association experiments. By drawing on heretofore overlooked primary sources, I offer a new, critical perspective on the emergence and development of Jung's test while engaging with its main theoretical and methodological aspects. I show that the test was neither Jung's sole creation nor did it consist of a simple, straightforward set of tasks. Contrarily, it was the result of a highly collaborative, multilayered institutionalized research program on linguistic and mental associations. The program, its data and its assumptions fueled several debates and data-driven discussions at Zurich, precluding the test from achieving a stable, standardized character. As a result, the history of Jung's program reflects both the advances and the limitations of early 20th-century personality testing. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

临床心理学在20世纪头十年出现在美国。虽然他们专注于智力测试,但从1905年左右开始,某些临床心理学家通过一种特殊的、非智力的测试来进行人格评估:瑞士精神病学家卡尔·古斯塔夫·荣格(1875-1961)在苏黎世Burghölzli精神病诊所设计的单词联想测试。该测试是20世纪初北美精神病学和心理学专业化的关键手段:从1905年起,它被实验和临床心理学家认可、讨论和应用。然而,荣格最初的实验和测试本身的发展只受到科学史家的肤浅或漫不经心的关注。这篇文章试图提供一个关键的,精简的,并详细说明起源,发展和物质的苏黎世词联想实验。通过借鉴迄今为止被忽视的主要来源,我提供了一个新的、批判性的视角来看待荣格测试的出现和发展,同时涉及其主要的理论和方法方面。我指出,这个测试既不是荣格的唯一发明,也不是由一组简单直接的任务组成的。相反,这是一个高度合作的、多层次的、制度化的语言和心理联想研究项目的结果。这个项目、它的数据和它的假设在苏黎世引发了几次辩论和数据驱动的讨论,阻碍了测试实现稳定、标准化的特征。因此,荣格项目的历史既反映了20世纪早期人格测试的进步,也反映了它的局限性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"How did early North American clinical psychologists get their first personality test? Carl Gustav Jung, the Zurich School of Psychiatry, and the development of the \"Word Association Test\" (1898-1909).","authors":"Catriel Fierro","doi":"10.1037/hop0000218","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000218","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical psychology emerged in the United States during the first decades of the 20th century. Although they focused on intelligence tests, starting around 1905 certain clinical psychologists pursued personality assessment through a specific, nonintellectual kind of test: the word association test as devised by Swiss psychiatrist Carl Gustav Jung (1875-1961) at the Burghölzli psychiatric clinic in Zurich. The test was a key device in the professionalization of North American psychiatry and psychology during the early 20th century: from 1905 onward it was acknowledged, discussed, and applied by experimental and clinical psychologists. However, Jung's original experiments and the development of the test itself have received only superficial or casual attention by historians of science. This article attempts to provide a critical, streamlined, and detailed account on the origin, development, and substance of the Zurich word association experiments. By drawing on heretofore overlooked primary sources, I offer a new, critical perspective on the emergence and development of Jung's test while engaging with its main theoretical and methodological aspects. I show that the test was neither Jung's sole creation nor did it consist of a simple, straightforward set of tasks. Contrarily, it was the result of a highly collaborative, multilayered institutionalized research program on linguistic and mental associations. The program, its data and its assumptions fueled several debates and data-driven discussions at Zurich, precluding the test from achieving a stable, standardized character. As a result, the history of Jung's program reflects both the advances and the limitations of early 20th-century personality testing. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":51852,"journal":{"name":"History of Psychology","volume":"25 4","pages":"295-321"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10620802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Problems and possibilities concerning the concept of psychoanalytic pedagogy in the light of the work of Susan Isaacs in the malting house school. 从苏珊·艾萨克斯在麦亭屋学派的工作看精神分析教育学概念的问题与可能性。
IF 0.5 4区 心理学 Q1 HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2022-08-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-29 DOI: 10.1037/hop0000207
Dóra Szabó

In the first decades of the 20th century, high hopes were raised of the adaptability of psychoanalysis into the pedagogical field. According to this new discourse, the possibilities of educational application became one of the most important research areas within the psychoanalytical community. However, several definitional and technical questions have remained unexplained. The aim of this article is to highlight the theoretical and methodological difficulties and opportunities regarding the concept of the so-called "psychoanalytically informed pedagogy" through the examination of the Malting House School, a unique and well-documented nursery in British educational history. This article focuses on Susan Isaacs' educational practice from 1924 until 1927 and its connection with psychoanalytic theory. Isaacs' critical reflections concerning her work at the Malting House School can offer a different perspective not just to the historical examination of psychoanalytic pedagogy, but generally to the scientific relationship between theory and practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

在20世纪的头几十年里,人们对精神分析在教学领域的适应性寄予厚望。根据这种新的论述,教育应用的可能性成为精神分析界最重要的研究领域之一。但是,仍有几个定义和技术问题无法解释。本文的目的是通过对Malting House学校(英国教育史上一个独特的、有充分记录的托儿所)的考察,强调关于所谓的“精神分析教育”概念的理论和方法上的困难和机遇。本文主要研究了苏珊·艾萨克斯1924年至1927年的教育实践及其与精神分析理论的联系。艾萨克斯对她在麦廷豪斯学校工作的批判性反思,不仅为精神分析教育学的历史考察提供了一个不同的视角,而且为理论与实践之间的科学关系提供了一个普遍的视角。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Problems and possibilities concerning the concept of psychoanalytic pedagogy in the light of the work of Susan Isaacs in the malting house school.","authors":"Dóra Szabó","doi":"10.1037/hop0000207","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000207","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the first decades of the 20th century, high hopes were raised of the adaptability of psychoanalysis into the pedagogical field. According to this new discourse, the possibilities of educational application became one of the most important research areas within the psychoanalytical community. However, several definitional and technical questions have remained unexplained. The aim of this article is to highlight the theoretical and methodological difficulties and opportunities regarding the concept of the so-called \"psychoanalytically informed pedagogy\" through the examination of the Malting House School, a unique and well-documented nursery in British educational history. This article focuses on Susan Isaacs' educational practice from 1924 until 1927 and its connection with psychoanalytic theory. Isaacs' critical reflections concerning her work at the Malting House School can offer a different perspective not just to the historical examination of psychoanalytic pedagogy, but generally to the scientific relationship between theory and practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":51852,"journal":{"name":"History of Psychology","volume":"25 3","pages":"272-289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39676555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A neglected and forgotten episode of Nazi Race Psychology in Occupied Poland: A critical analysis by T. Tomaszewski (1945). 被忽视和被遗忘的纳粹种族心理在被占领的波兰:T. Tomaszewski(1945)的批判性分析。
IF 0.5 4区 心理学 Q1 HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2022-08-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-31 DOI: 10.1037/hop0000210
Wojciech Pisula, Hanna Mamzer, Jacek Mirecki, Reinhard Lauterbach, Dariusz Doliński

In the 1930s and 1940s, the Nazis used science as a tool for shaping state policy. One of the most abhorrent aspects of scientific collaboration with the Nazis at that time was the broadly defined field of "race psychology." In this article, we focus on German comparative research on the psychology of Poles and Germans, as analyzed by Tadeusz Tomaszewski, who is considered to be one of the founders of contemporary Polish psychology. We illuminate this episode from the history of science by providing a full translation of Tomaszewski's article published in 1945 on a research project led by Rudolf Hippius conducted in 1942 in Poznań (in occupied Poland) in the name of the political interests and ideology of the Nazi regime. We also shed light on the historical context of Tomaszewski's article, which facilitates the understanding of the core ideas of race/ethnic psychology per se; the sociohistorical context also provides the framework in which the other research articles that we refer to must be read. Reading Tomaszewski's text today will enhance our understanding of the relationship between science and politics, and serve as a warning for researchers today. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

在20世纪30年代和40年代,纳粹利用科学作为制定国家政策的工具。当时与纳粹的科学合作中最令人憎恶的方面之一是定义广泛的“种族心理学”领域。本文以被认为是当代波兰心理学奠基人之一的塔德乌什·托马泽夫斯基为例,着重分析了德国对波兰人和德国人心理的比较研究。我们通过提供托马舍夫斯基在1945年发表的一篇文章的完整翻译来阐明科学史上的这一事件,该文章发表于1942年由鲁道夫·希皮乌斯领导的一个研究项目,该项目以纳粹政权的政治利益和意识形态的名义在波兹纳斯(在被占领的波兰)进行。我们还阐明了Tomaszewski文章的历史背景,这有助于理解种族/民族心理学本身的核心思想;社会历史背景也提供了一个框架,我们提到的其他研究文章必须在其中阅读。今天阅读Tomaszewski的文章将增强我们对科学与政治之间关系的理解,并对今天的研究人员起到警示作用。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"A neglected and forgotten episode of Nazi Race Psychology in Occupied Poland: A critical analysis by T. Tomaszewski (1945).","authors":"Wojciech Pisula,&nbsp;Hanna Mamzer,&nbsp;Jacek Mirecki,&nbsp;Reinhard Lauterbach,&nbsp;Dariusz Doliński","doi":"10.1037/hop0000210","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000210","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the 1930s and 1940s, the Nazis used science as a tool for shaping state policy. One of the most abhorrent aspects of scientific collaboration with the Nazis at that time was the broadly defined field of \"race psychology.\" In this article, we focus on German comparative research on the psychology of Poles and Germans, as analyzed by Tadeusz Tomaszewski, who is considered to be one of the founders of contemporary Polish psychology. We illuminate this episode from the history of science by providing a full translation of Tomaszewski's article published in 1945 on a research project led by Rudolf Hippius conducted in 1942 in Poznań (in occupied Poland) in the name of the political interests and ideology of the Nazi regime. We also shed light on the historical context of Tomaszewski's article, which facilitates the understanding of the core ideas of race/ethnic psychology per se; the sociohistorical context also provides the framework in which the other research articles that we refer to must be read. Reading Tomaszewski's text today will enhance our understanding of the relationship between science and politics, and serve as a warning for researchers today. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":51852,"journal":{"name":"History of Psychology","volume":"25 3","pages":"245-271"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39736625","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
A poem. 一首诗。
IF 0.5 4区 心理学 Q1 HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI: 10.1037/h0101889
H. Whitaker
This poem, titled On Aristotle's Model of Memory, mentions the concepts of recall, sensus communis, fantasia, perception, and cognition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
这首题为《论亚里士多德的记忆模型》的诗提到了回忆、共感、幻想、知觉和认知等概念。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"A poem.","authors":"H. Whitaker","doi":"10.1037/h0101889","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/h0101889","url":null,"abstract":"This poem, titled On Aristotle's Model of Memory, mentions the concepts of recall, sensus communis, fantasia, perception, and cognition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":51852,"journal":{"name":"History of Psychology","volume":"25 3 1","pages":"291"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44497698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Psychology as if the whole earth mattered: Nuclear threat, environmental crisis, and the emergence of planetary psychology. 仿佛整个地球都很重要的心理学:核威胁、环境危机和行星心理学的出现。
IF 0.5 4区 心理学 Q1 HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2022-05-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-20 DOI: 10.1037/hop0000208
James Dunk

This article traces a genealogy for the various strands of contemporary psychology which are concerned with global environmental change, including conservation psychology, ecopsychology, and other subfields and interdisciplinary concentrations. Focusing on a network of psychiatrists, psychologists, and other researchers based at a research center founded in Cambridge, Massachusetts in 1982, the article explores what those who first turned to the psychological causes and implications of climate change and other kinds of global environmental disruption had learned from their studies of nuclear-era psychology. The explorations of these researchers and practitioners in systems psychology, depth psychology, and political psychology, elicited by the first truly planetary crisis of the modern world, the threat of general nuclear war (which, apart from the enormous damage done at Hiroshima and Nagasaki and during weapons tests, remained largely theoretical), were applied to a new planetary crisis which was already unfolding: global environmental degradation. As they completed this pivot from the nuclear threat to the environmental crisis, at the end of the Cold War, using the language of the psychology of survival, these researchers displayed the form and function of what might be called a planetary psychology-of psychological theory and practice which broaches the planetary context of the individual psyche. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

本文追溯了与全球环境变化有关的当代心理学的各个分支的谱系,包括保护心理学、生态心理学和其他子领域和跨学科的集中。这篇文章着眼于1982年在马萨诸塞州剑桥成立的一个研究中心的精神病学家、心理学家和其他研究人员的网络,探讨了那些第一次转向气候变化和其他全球环境破坏的心理原因和影响的人从他们对核时代心理学的研究中学到了什么。这些研究人员和实践者在系统心理学、深度心理学和政治心理学方面的探索,是由现代世界的第一次真正的全球性危机——全面核战争的威胁(除了在广岛和长崎以及武器试验期间造成的巨大破坏之外,在很大程度上仍然是理论上的)——引发的,被应用于已经展开的新的全球性危机:全球环境退化。当他们在冷战结束时完成了从核威胁到环境危机的转变,使用生存心理学的语言,这些研究人员展示了可能被称为行星心理学的形式和功能-心理学理论和实践,它提出了个人心理的行星背景。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Psychology as if the whole earth mattered: Nuclear threat, environmental crisis, and the emergence of planetary psychology.","authors":"James Dunk","doi":"10.1037/hop0000208","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000208","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article traces a genealogy for the various strands of contemporary psychology which are concerned with global environmental change, including conservation psychology, ecopsychology, and other subfields and interdisciplinary concentrations. Focusing on a network of psychiatrists, psychologists, and other researchers based at a research center founded in Cambridge, Massachusetts in 1982, the article explores what those who first turned to the psychological causes and implications of climate change and other kinds of global environmental disruption had learned from their studies of nuclear-era psychology. The explorations of these researchers and practitioners in systems psychology, depth psychology, and political psychology, elicited by the first truly planetary crisis of the modern world, the threat of general nuclear war (which, apart from the enormous damage done at Hiroshima and Nagasaki and during weapons tests, remained largely theoretical), were applied to a new planetary crisis which was already unfolding: global environmental degradation. As they completed this pivot from the nuclear threat to the environmental crisis, at the end of the Cold War, using the language of the psychology of survival, these researchers displayed the form and function of what might be called a planetary psychology-of psychological theory and practice which broaches the planetary context of the individual psyche. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":51852,"journal":{"name":"History of Psychology","volume":"25 2","pages":"97-120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39741756","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Psychology of eyewitness testimony in Germany in the 20th century. 20世纪德国目击者证词心理学。
IF 0.5 4区 心理学 Q1 HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2022-05-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-28 DOI: 10.1037/hop0000199
Siegfried Ludwig Sporer, Mauro Antonelli

The history of the psychology of eyewitness testimony cannot be adequately understood without taking the respective legal systems, that is inquisitorial versus adversarial system, into account. Across all periods, questions regarding the accuracy of testimony, its suggestibility, and intentional distortions in false accusations become apparent. We describe the history of the experimental psychology of testimony in Germany from the beginning of the 20th century until the time after the second world war. Louis William Stern and Otto Lipmann conceived and established a broad conception of Aussagepsychologie (psychology of report), attracting the collaboration of lawyers, pedagogues, and scholars from other disciplines to conduct laboratory and staged event experiments. They were successful in institutionalizing psychology and law by organizing interdisciplinary conferences, founding a journal, and testifying as experts in court. When appearing as experts, they encountered strong rivalry from psychiatrists. We also sketch some of the problems psychologists in Germany faced during the second world war. In our discussion, we stress the importance of legal, contextual, and sociocultural factors affecting both research outcomes and expert testimony, which appear to be parallel to present-day concerns. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

如果不考虑各自的法律制度,即调查与对抗制度,就无法充分理解目击证人证词的心理学历史。在所有时期,关于证词的准确性,其暗示性和在虚假指控中故意歪曲的问题变得明显。我们描述了从20世纪初到第二次世界大战结束后,德国的证词实验心理学的历史。Louis William Stern和Otto Lipmann构想并建立了宽泛的aussagepsyologie(报告心理学)概念,吸引了律师、教师和其他学科学者的合作,进行实验室和阶段事件实验。他们通过组织跨学科会议、创办期刊、在法庭上作为专家作证,成功地将心理学和法律制度化。当他们以专家的身份出现时,他们遇到了来自精神科医生的强烈竞争。我们还概述了德国心理学家在二战期间面临的一些问题。在我们的讨论中,我们强调了影响研究成果和专家证词的法律、背景和社会文化因素的重要性,这些因素似乎与当今的问题相似。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Psychology of eyewitness testimony in Germany in the 20th century.","authors":"Siegfried Ludwig Sporer,&nbsp;Mauro Antonelli","doi":"10.1037/hop0000199","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000199","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The history of the psychology of eyewitness testimony cannot be adequately understood without taking the respective legal systems, that is inquisitorial versus adversarial system, into account. Across all periods, questions regarding the accuracy of testimony, its suggestibility, and intentional distortions in false accusations become apparent. We describe the history of the experimental psychology of testimony in Germany from the beginning of the 20th century until the time after the second world war. Louis William Stern and Otto Lipmann conceived and established a broad conception of <i>Aussagepsychologie</i> (psychology of report), attracting the collaboration of lawyers, pedagogues, and scholars from other disciplines to conduct laboratory and staged event experiments. They were successful in institutionalizing psychology and law by organizing interdisciplinary conferences, founding a journal, and testifying as experts in court. When appearing as experts, they encountered strong rivalry from psychiatrists. We also sketch some of the problems psychologists in Germany faced during the second world war. In our discussion, we stress the importance of legal, contextual, and sociocultural factors affecting both research outcomes and expert testimony, which appear to be parallel to present-day concerns. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":51852,"journal":{"name":"History of Psychology","volume":"25 2","pages":"143-169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39583225","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Georges Politzer's "brilliant errors": Concrete psychology in France (1930-1980). 乔治·波利策的“辉煌的错误”:法国的具体心理学(1930-1980)。
IF 0.5 4区 心理学 Q1 HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2022-05-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-13 DOI: 10.1037/hop0000156
Giuseppe Bianco

The present article assesses the hidden importance of Georges Politzer's (1903-1942) work in the development of French philosophy and psychology. After sketching his biography and isolating the most important concepts developed in his book Critique of the Foundations of Psychology (1928), this article proceeds by dividing his reception into four distinct moments, the features of which derive from the interconnected mutations of the scientific field in its relation with the transformation of the political field. In the first moment, the publication of the Critique, Politzer's most important work, played an essential role in introducing psychoanalysis into philosophy, psychology, and psychiatry, and in sketching the path of a possible encounter between psychoanalysis and Marxism. In the second moment, during the 1940s and the 1950s, following Politzer's Marxist auto-critique, French communists widely rejected psychoanalysis as a dangerous ideology. In the third moment, during the 1960s in a context marked by structuralism, both the psychoanalysts and the Marxists addressed to Politzer's humanism a new, theoretical, critique. Finally, at the end of the 1960s and even more after May 1968, Politzer's works were republished and reevaluated, and new transformations taking place in the intellectual and political field during the 1970s contributed to a better understanding of Politzer's essential role in French philosophy, psychology, and psychoanalysis. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

本文评估了乔治·波利策尔(1903-1942)在法国哲学和心理学发展中的潜在重要性。在概述了他的传记,并在他的《心理学基础批判》(1928)一书中分离出最重要的概念之后,本文将他的接受分为四个不同的时刻,这些时刻的特征源于科学领域与政治领域的转变之间相互关联的突变。首先,波利策最重要的著作《批判》的出版,在将精神分析引入哲学、心理学和精神病学,以及描绘精神分析与马克思主义可能相遇的道路方面发挥了至关重要的作用。在20世纪40年代和50年代,在波利策的马克思主义自我批判之后,法国共产党人普遍拒绝精神分析,认为这是一种危险的意识形态。在第三个时刻,在20世纪60年代,在一个以结构主义为标志的背景下,精神分析学家和马克思主义者都对波利策尔的人文主义提出了一种新的、理论上的批评。最后,在20世纪60年代末,甚至在1968年5月之后,波利策尔的作品被重新出版和重新评估,以及20世纪70年代知识和政治领域发生的新转变,有助于更好地理解波利策尔在法国哲学、心理学和精神分析学中的重要作用。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Georges Politzer's \"brilliant errors\": Concrete psychology in France (1930-1980).","authors":"Giuseppe Bianco","doi":"10.1037/hop0000156","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000156","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present article assesses the hidden importance of Georges Politzer's (1903-1942) work in the development of French philosophy and psychology. After sketching his biography and isolating the most important concepts developed in his book <i>Critique of the Foundations of Psychology</i> (1928), this article proceeds by dividing his reception into four distinct moments, the features of which derive from the interconnected mutations of the scientific field in its relation with the transformation of the political field. In the first moment, the publication of the <i>Critique</i>, Politzer's most important work, played an essential role in introducing psychoanalysis into philosophy, psychology, and psychiatry, and in sketching the path of a possible encounter between psychoanalysis and Marxism. In the second moment, during the 1940s and the 1950s, following Politzer's Marxist auto-critique, French communists widely rejected psychoanalysis as a dangerous ideology. In the third moment, during the 1960s in a context marked by structuralism, both the psychoanalysts and the Marxists addressed to Politzer's humanism a new, theoretical, critique. Finally, at the end of the 1960s and even more after May 1968, Politzer's works were republished and reevaluated, and new transformations taking place in the intellectual and political field during the 1970s contributed to a better understanding of Politzer's essential role in French philosophy, psychology, and psychoanalysis. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":51852,"journal":{"name":"History of Psychology","volume":"25 2","pages":"170-189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39414433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How statistics became a "forbidden trick" for Soviet psychologists. 统计数据如何成为苏联心理学家的“禁忌把戏”。
IF 0.5 4区 心理学 Q1 HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI: 10.1037/hop0000204
S. Morozova
This study reconstructs the process by which quantitative methods were gradually displaced from Russian psychology in the early Soviet period. By the early 1930s, there was a decline in the importance of mathematical methods in psychological disciplines. It was accompanied by the rejection of some mathematical methods and the ideologization of the description of quantitative methodology. After the Central Committee's decree "O pedologicheskikh izvrashcheniyakh v sisteme Narkomprosov" ("On Pedological Perversions in the System of Narkomproses") of 1936 was published in the pages of national newspapers, statistical practice was completely discredited. At the same time, textbooks on statistics in psychological disciplines were withdrawn from circulation. Scientists' attempts to defend the neutrality of scientific methods were unsuccessful and were publicly criticized. As a result, statistical practice almost completely disappeared from psychological disciplines after 1936, although there was no outright ban on the use of statistics. There are two possible reasons for this. First, psychologists may have abandoned statistical practices as a result of ideological pressure. Second, owing to the elimination of mathematical methods, internal disciplinary contradictions-in particular, those characteristic of pedology-were eliminated. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
本研究重建了定量方法在苏联早期逐渐从俄罗斯心理学中被取代的过程。到20世纪30年代初,数学方法在心理学学科中的重要性有所下降。它伴随着对某些数学方法的拒绝和定量方法论描述的意识形态化。自从1936年中央委员会的法令《论民族公社制度中的土壤学歪曲》在国家报纸上发表之后,统计实践就完全失去了公信力。与此同时,心理学学科的统计教科书也被停止流通。科学家们试图捍卫科学方法的中立性是不成功的,并受到了公众的批评。结果,统计实践在1936年之后几乎完全从心理学学科中消失了,尽管没有完全禁止使用统计。这可能有两个原因。首先,由于意识形态的压力,心理学家可能已经放弃了统计实践。第二,由于消除了数学方法,消除了学科内部的矛盾,特别是土壤学的矛盾。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"How statistics became a \"forbidden trick\" for Soviet psychologists.","authors":"S. Morozova","doi":"10.1037/hop0000204","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000204","url":null,"abstract":"This study reconstructs the process by which quantitative methods were gradually displaced from Russian psychology in the early Soviet period. By the early 1930s, there was a decline in the importance of mathematical methods in psychological disciplines. It was accompanied by the rejection of some mathematical methods and the ideologization of the description of quantitative methodology. After the Central Committee's decree \"O pedologicheskikh izvrashcheniyakh v sisteme Narkomprosov\" (\"On Pedological Perversions in the System of Narkomproses\") of 1936 was published in the pages of national newspapers, statistical practice was completely discredited. At the same time, textbooks on statistics in psychological disciplines were withdrawn from circulation. Scientists' attempts to defend the neutrality of scientific methods were unsuccessful and were publicly criticized. As a result, statistical practice almost completely disappeared from psychological disciplines after 1936, although there was no outright ban on the use of statistics. There are two possible reasons for this. First, psychologists may have abandoned statistical practices as a result of ideological pressure. Second, owing to the elimination of mathematical methods, internal disciplinary contradictions-in particular, those characteristic of pedology-were eliminated. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":51852,"journal":{"name":"History of Psychology","volume":"25 2 1","pages":"121-142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45725187","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
"Eugenics, social reform, and psychology: The careers of Isabelle Kendig": Correction to Harris (2021). “优生学、社会改革和心理学:伊莎贝尔·肯迪格的职业生涯”:对哈里斯的更正(2021)。
IF 0.5 4区 心理学 Q1 HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2022-03-17 DOI: 10.1037/hop0000215
Reports an error in "Eugenics, social reform, and psychology: The careers of Isabelle Kendig" by Ben Harris (History of Psychology, 2021[Nov], Vol 24[4], 350-376). In the article, multiple instances of "St. Elizabeths Hospital" were incorrectly changed to "St. Elizabeth's Hospital." The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2021-90746-001.) The psychologist Isabelle Kendig had two careers before earning her doctorate and rising to the position of chief psychologist at St. Elizabeths Hospital in Washington, DC. She began as a eugenic field worker in 1912, focusing on Shutesbury, Massachusetts, where she administered intelligence tests to the locals, collected gossip about their character, and created genealogical charts. When she presented her research to Charles Davenport and other social scientists concerned with social defect, Kendig dissented from eugenics orthodoxy. She was shunned by Davenport, who, in turn, falsified her findings to fit his beliefs. She was then hired by Massachusetts and New Hampshire to survey intellectual disability in each state. Following her work in eugenics, Kendig was briefly a leading figure in feminist and antimilitarist campaigns, including the National Women's Party and the 1924 presidential campaign of Senator Robert La Follette. In 1933, she earned a PhD in clinical psychology from Radcliffe and went on to help guide the field's post-WWII expansion. True to her feminist ideals and with the help of her husband, she juggled marriage, her three careers, and the parenting of four children. She thus serves as a noteworthy member of the second generation of women in psychology in the United States. Using unpublished correspondence between Kendig, her parents, and her future husband, this article offers a rare glimpse of a young feminist struggling to build a career and a life unconstrained by patriarchal norms. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Ben Harris的《优生学、社会改革和心理学:Isabelle Kendig的职业生涯》(《心理学史》,2021年11月,第24卷[4],350-376)中报告了一个错误。在这篇文章中,“圣伊丽莎白医院”的多个实例被错误地更改为“圣伊丽莎白医院”。这篇文章的在线版本已被更正。(以下原文章摘要出现在记录2021-0746-001中。)心理学家Isabelle Kendig在获得博士学位和升任华盛顿特区圣伊丽莎白医院首席心理学家之前,有过两段职业生涯。1912年,她开始从事优生学领域的工作,专注于马萨诸塞州的舒茨伯里,在那里她对当地人进行智力测试,收集关于他们性格的八卦,并创建家谱图。当肯迪格向查尔斯·达文波特和其他关注社会缺陷的社会科学家介绍她的研究时,她反对优生学的正统观念。达文波特回避了她,而达文波特又篡改了她的发现以符合他的信仰。随后,她受雇于马萨诸塞州和新罕布什尔州,调查各州的智力残疾情况。在从事优生学工作后,肯迪格曾短暂地成为女权主义和反军事运动的领军人物,包括国家妇女党和参议员罗伯特·拉福莱特1924年的总统竞选。1933年,她在拉德克利夫获得了临床心理学博士学位,并继续帮助指导该领域在二战后的扩张。她忠于自己的女权主义理想,在丈夫的帮助下,兼顾了婚姻、三份事业和四个孩子的养育。因此,她是美国心理学第二代女性中值得注意的一员。这篇文章利用肯迪格、她的父母和她未来的丈夫之间未公开的信件,罕见地一瞥了一位年轻的女权主义者在努力建立一个不受父权规范约束的职业和生活。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"\"Eugenics, social reform, and psychology: The careers of Isabelle Kendig\": Correction to Harris (2021).","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/hop0000215","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000215","url":null,"abstract":"Reports an error in \"Eugenics, social reform, and psychology: The careers of Isabelle Kendig\" by Ben Harris (History of Psychology, 2021[Nov], Vol 24[4], 350-376). In the article, multiple instances of \"St. Elizabeths Hospital\" were incorrectly changed to \"St. Elizabeth's Hospital.\" The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2021-90746-001.) The psychologist Isabelle Kendig had two careers before earning her doctorate and rising to the position of chief psychologist at St. Elizabeths Hospital in Washington, DC. She began as a eugenic field worker in 1912, focusing on Shutesbury, Massachusetts, where she administered intelligence tests to the locals, collected gossip about their character, and created genealogical charts. When she presented her research to Charles Davenport and other social scientists concerned with social defect, Kendig dissented from eugenics orthodoxy. She was shunned by Davenport, who, in turn, falsified her findings to fit his beliefs. She was then hired by Massachusetts and New Hampshire to survey intellectual disability in each state. Following her work in eugenics, Kendig was briefly a leading figure in feminist and antimilitarist campaigns, including the National Women's Party and the 1924 presidential campaign of Senator Robert La Follette. In 1933, she earned a PhD in clinical psychology from Radcliffe and went on to help guide the field's post-WWII expansion. True to her feminist ideals and with the help of her husband, she juggled marriage, her three careers, and the parenting of four children. She thus serves as a noteworthy member of the second generation of women in psychology in the United States. Using unpublished correspondence between Kendig, her parents, and her future husband, this article offers a rare glimpse of a young feminist struggling to build a career and a life unconstrained by patriarchal norms. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":51852,"journal":{"name":"History of Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2022-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48504938","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
History of Psychology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1