Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry最新文献

Background: Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are associated with the development of negative health behaviors and medical illnesses. ACE's association with poor health outcomes has been well documented in the general population; however, this relationship remains less clear in liver transplant (LT) recipients.

Objective: The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of ACE and the influence of ACE on LT outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective electronic medical record review of all LT recipients over 11 years at an academic LT center. Demographic, diagnostic, and disease characteristics were extracted and compared for a history of ACE. Associations between a history of ACE and extracted variables were statistically tested using Student's t-test, chi-square tests, or Fisher's exact test, where appropriate. Graft and patient survival were tested using log-rank tests.

Results: Of the 1172 LT recipients, 24.1% endorsed a history of ACE. Females (P = 0.017) and recipients with lower levels of education (P < 0.001) had a higher frequency of ACE. Those with a history of ACE had a higher prevalence of hepatitis C virus (P < 0.001) and higher pretransplant body mass index (P < 0.001). Recipients with a history of ACE had higher prevalence of mood (P < 0.001), anxiety (P < 0.001), post traumatic stress disorder (P < 0.001), alcohol use (P < 0.001), and cannabis use (P < 0.001) disorders, as well as higher Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (P < 0.001) and General Anxiety Disorder-7 (P < 0.001) scores pre- and post-transplant. Those with ACE had a higher incidence of recorded relapses to alcohol by 3 years post-transplant (P = 0.027). Mean lab values, graft survival, and patient survival were not significantly different between those with and without a history of ACE except for total bilirubin at 6 months (P = 0.021).

Conclusions: One-quarter of LT recipients have experienced ACE. ACE was associated with a history of psychiatric diagnoses, substance use disorders, elevated Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and General Anxiety Disorder-7 scores, and a higher prevalence of relapse to alcohol use after transplant. This population may benefit from increased/improved access to appropriate mental health and substance use services and support in the peri- and post-transplant period.

We are in a youth mental health crisis with unprecedented and staggeringly high rates of suicidal ideations and suicide behaviors in preteens. In the United States, 14.5% of children aged 9-10 have experienced suicidal thoughts and behaviors, including 1.3% with a suicide attempt. American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines call for universal suicide risk screening of youth aged 12 years and older during preventative health care visits and screening in preteens aged 8-11 years when clinically indicated. However, what constitutes a clinical indication at 8-11 years can be difficult to systematically detect, and pediatric practitioners may not be equipped with necessary age-specific assessment tools. This is compounded by the lack of emphasis on preteen suicide risk screening (and focus on adolescents), which leaves practitioners without age-appropriate resources to make clinical determinations for at-risk preteens. The objective of this project was to develop an evidence-informed suicide risk screening pathway for pediatric practitioners to implement with preteen patients in outpatient settings. Suicide risk assessment in younger children (<8 years) is also briefly addressed. We convened a group of researchers and practitioners with expertise in preadolescent suicide, pediatric medicine, behavioral health screening integration with primary care, and child development. They reviewed the empirical literature and existing practice guidelines to iterate on a multi-informant clinical suicide risk screening pathway for preteens that includes both caregivers and preteens in the screening process. We also developed tools and accompanying guidelines for a preteen suicide risk screening workflow and risk determination to aid practitioners in deciding who, when, and how to screen. Finally, we provide scripts for introducing suicide risk screening to caregivers and preteens and to discuss screening findings.

Background: In critically ill patients, delirium is a prognostic indicator of morbidity and mortality.

Objective: This study investigates the impact of a delirium diagnosis on outcomes after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation.

Methods: This retrospective study included all adult patients who received LVADs at our institution between January 2016 and December 2020. We compared preimplantation characteristics between the two groups, with and without a diagnosis of delirium, and compared their outcomes, including 1-month, 6-month, and in-hospital mortality, as well as reintubation rate, length of stay, discharge disposition, and readmission rates.

Results: In total, 361 patients (26.7% women and 75.8% African American) received durable LVADs. Ninety-four patients (26.1%) were diagnosed with delirium during the index admission. Preimplantation demographic characteristics, past medical and psychiatric conditions, Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support Profile, and laboratory values did not differ between the two groups with and without a diagnosis of delirium; older age (59 vs 56; P = 0.03) was associated with delirium. Delirium diagnosis was associated with higher 1-month (P = 0.007), 6-month (P = 0.004), and in-hospital mortality (P < 0.001), unplanned reintubations (P < 0.001), and a lower likelihood of discharge home (P = 0.03). Total hospital and intensive care unit length of stay were higher in patients with a diagnosis of delirium, though these results were not statistically significant. Readmission to the hospital after index admission was quicker in patients with a diagnosis of delirium, but this result was not statistically significant.

Conclusions: In this study, a diagnosis of delirium during the LVAD implantation admission was associated with higher mortality, adverse postsurgical outcomes, and unfavorable discharge dispositions. Future prospective research is needed to validate the prognostic implications of delirium in both the short and long term. Additionally, there is a need to identify modifiable risk factors associated with delirium to promote early diagnosis and implement evidence-based management strategies to enhance outcomes within this population.