Herzschrittmachertherapie und Elektrophysiologie最新文献

This article focuses on ventricular arrythmias without evidence for structural heart disease. There are many different reasons for this type of arrythmia and there is still a gap of knowledge. Starting with the first description of this disease, we present the diagnosis and management with medication, and finally catheter ablation procedures from the beginning to how it is currently treated and how it possibly will be treated in the near future.

The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) was a breakthrough in the prevention of sudden cardiac death. After years of technical development in the USA, Michel Mirowski succeeded in proving reliable automatic defibrillation of ventricular tachyarrhythmias through initial human implantations in 1980, despite many obstacles. Nearly 4 years later, the first patients received ICDs at multiple centers in Germany. Subsequently, outside the USA, Germany became the country with highest implantation rates. The absolute number of implantations remained small as long as implantations required epicardial defibrillation electrodes and therefore thoracotomy by cardiac surgeons. Pacemaker-like implantation using a transvenous defibrillation electrode with a pectoral ICD became feasible in the early 1990s pushing implantation rates to the next level. Technical advancements were accompanied by clinical research in Germany, and often, the first-in-human studies were conducted in Germany. In 1991, the first guidelines for indications were established in the USA and Germany. Several randomized studies on indications were published between 1996 and 2009, mostly led by American teams with German participation, but also under German leadership (CASH, CAT, DINAMIT, IRIS). The DANISH study in 2016 questioned the results of these long-standing studies. Instead of providing ICDs to patients using a broad indication, future efforts aim to identify patients who, despite optimal medical therapy, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), and/or catheter ablation, need protection against sudden cardiac death. Risk scores incorporating myocardial scars in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and genetic information are expected to contribute to more individualized and effective indications.

In 1930, Wolff, Parkinson and White described the syndrome that bears their names. The mechanisms of supraventricular tachycardias were analyzed by brilliant electrocardiography interpretation by Pick and Langendorf. Wellens and Durrer using electrophysiologic studies analyzed the tachycardia mechanism invasively. In Germany the group by Seipel and Breithardt as well as Neuss and Schlepper studied the tachycardia mechanisms and response to antiarrhythmic drugs invasively by electrophysiological studies. Following the first successful interruption of an accessory pathway by Sealy in 1967, surgeons and electrophysiologists cooperated in Germany. Two centers, Hannover and Düsseldorf were established. Direct current (DC) ablation of accessory pathways was introduced by Morady and Scheinman. Because of side effects induced by barotrauma of DC, alternative strategies were studied. In 1987, radiofrequency ablation was introduced and thereafter established as curative therapy of accessory pathways in all locations.

Genetic testing and counselling has become a fundamental part of the diagnostic work-up and risk stratification in ion channel diseases. The diagnostic yield varies among the different entities. For the most common diseases, there is a class I recommendation for the initiation of genetic testing and counseling. The German law for genetic diagnostics defines all steps of the pathway in detail. In clinical practice, coordination of the different levels of clinical guidance and genetic diagnostics and testing poses a logistic challenge. Involving human geneticists in the procedure is mandatory. For predictive genetic testing, human genetic counseling is mandatory before initiation of the testing and after obtaining the results. As far as causality of genetic variants for the arrhythmic phenotypes is concerned, repeated curations are undertaken to avoid misinterpretation and overdiagnosis.

Background: Data on the prognostic significance of pacing dependency in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are sparse.

Methods: The prognostic significance of pacing dependency defined as absence of an intrinsic rhythm ≥ 30 bpm was determined in 786 patients with CIEDs at the authors' institution using univariate and multivariate regression analysis to identify predictors of all-cause mortality.

Results: During 49 months median follow-up, death occurred in 63 of 130 patients with pacing dependency compared to 241 of 656 patients without pacing dependency (48% versus 37%, hazard ratio [HR] 1.34; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.78, P = 0.04). Using multivariate regression analysis, predictors of all-cause mortality included age (HR 1.07; 95% CI: 1.05-1.08, P < 0.01), history of atrial fibrillation (HR 1.32, 95% CI: 1.03-1.69, P < 0.01), chronic kidney disease (HR 1.28; 95% CI: 1.00-1.63, P = 0.048) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class ≥ III (HR 2.00; 95% CI: 1.52-2.62, P < 0.01), but not pacing dependency (HR 1.15; 95% CI: 0.86-1.54, P = 0.35).

Conclusions: In contrast to age, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease and heart failure severity as indexed by NYHA functional class III or IV, pacing dependency does not appear to be an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in patients with CIEDs.

The paper presents the history of hope from 1980-1995 to predict the risk of sudden arrhythmic death using electrophysiologic techniques in individual patients. Even if this prediction seems possible in selected highly risk cohorts, many more patients will die in ventricular arrhythmia without fulfilling the criteria. Ultimately, high risk of sudden cardiac death can be predicted in selected patient groups, but not in the majority of patients at risk. It is a history of dashed hope.

The development and clinical implementation of catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia is one of the outstanding achievements of modern cardiovascular treatment. Over a period of less than 40 years, a curative and safe treatment strategy for almost all forms of atrial arrhythmias has been developed and implemented. German electrophysiologists and engineers have made a significant contribution to this truly outstanding success story in modern medicine. Their contributions should be appropriately acknowledged because without them, the development of ablation technology and its worldwide dissemination would not have been possible. Both the technological contributions and the medical-electrophysiological contributions were at the absolute forefront of worldwide developments and have made a significant contribution to the fact that today more than 500,000 patients with symptomatic and/or threatening cardiac arrhythmias can be successfully treated every year by use of catheter ablation. We would like to thank them all for their achievements.

Programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS), a clinical tool introduced in the early 1980s, aims to prove the electrical vulnerability of the heart and, independent of spontaneous arrhythmia variability, to trigger arrhythmias under controlled conditions. A specific response is the inducibility of monomorphic sustained ventricular tachycardia. This depends on the underlying heart disease, e.g., only for coronary artery disease but not for nonischemic diseases. The value of pharmacologic arrhythmia control as serial electrical testing is uncertain. Up to now there seems to be no prognostic value of PVS concerning sudden cardiac death. PVS is used as a tool to monitor the results of ventricular tachycardia (VT)-catheter ablation in patients who were primarily inducible.

Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VTs) has emerged as an effective treatment modality. Ablation procedures for idiopathic VTs depends on the anatomical origin of the arrhythmias, is highly effective in certain cases, and has been implemented as a first-line therapy in recent European guidelines. In contrast, catheter ablation of VTs in patients with structural heart disease has a significant risk of arrhythmia recurrence. Interventional treatment for patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy was studied in multiple randomized multicenter trials and it was shown that catheter ablation was more effective in arrhythmia suppression compared to conservative treatment modalities. Catheter ablation of nonischemic cardiomyopathy suffers from far higher rates of arrhythmia recurrences as documented in several long-term studies and often needs complex procedures with or without epicardial mapping and ablation. There is still no clear proof of a mortality benefit from catheter ablation of VTs in patients with or without structural heart disease. Nevertheless, recent guidelines recommend catheter ablation as an alternative to implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) in selected cases.