Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab最新文献

Introduction

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are widely used in tumor treatment. The detection of these medicines by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) can avoid the interference of structurally similar compounds.

Objectives

This study aimed to develop and validate a new LC-MS/MS assay for the quantification of eight tyrosine kinase inhibitors in human plasma and to preliminarily evaluate the clinical utility of the therapeutic drug monitoring method.

Methods

Plasma samples were prepared by simple protein precipitation and separated using an ultra-high-performance reversed phase column. Detection was achieved using a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer in the positive ionization mode. The assay was validated against standard guidelines. We reviewed and analyzed the results of 268 plasma samples obtained from patients administered imatinib and other TKIs collected from January 2020 to November 2021 at Zhongshan Hospital. The analytes were separated and quantified within 3.5 min.

Results

The newly developed method demonstrated linearity for the detected drug concentration in the range of 20 to 2000 ng/ml for gefitinib (r² = 0.991) and crizotinib (r² = 0.992), 50 to 5000 ng/ml for nilotinib (r² = 0.991) and imatinib (r² = 0.995), 1500–150,000 ng/ml for vemurafenib (r² = 0.998), 1000–100,000 ng/ml for pazopanib (r² = 0.993), 0.5–100 ng/ml for axitinib (r² = 0.992) and 5–500 ng/ml for sunitinib (r² = 0.991) and N-desethyl sunitinib (r² = 0.998). The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 20 ng/ml for gefitinib and crizotinib, 50 ng/ml for nilotinib and imatinib, 1500 ng/ml for vemurafenib, 1000 ng/ml for pazopanib, 0.5, and 5 ng/ml for sunitinib and N-desethyl sunitinib, respectively. Specificity, precision, accuracy, and stability were tested, and met the requirements of the guidelines. At the same dose, there was no significant difference in plasma drug concentration between the original imatinib medicine and the generic medicine after patent expiration.

Conclusion

We developed a sensitive and reliable method for the quantification of eight TKIs.

Introduction

Engaging pipetting events were developed to assess and challenge technicians’ practical sample handling using matrices common to the clinical laboratory. As correct pipetting stands as a prerequisite for accurate clinical laboratory testing, this helped to understand sources of imprecision and bias attributed to the underlying step of aspirating and dispensing patient samples and internal standard in clinical LC-MS/MS assays while highlighting the importance for the clinical laboratory to evaluate this source of variability on an on-going basis and mitigate its impact.

Methods

The events involved pipetting water, methanol, serum, and whole blood. Gravimetric analysis was used to determine the exact volumetric delivery of each matrix using two different techniques. Imprecision and bias were calculated based on the volume derived from the mass and density of each matrix, using literature values for each matrix type.

Results

Low imprecision and bias were observed when pipetting water, as in common commercial pipetting assessment programs. Significantly increased imprecision and bias were observed in more applicable matrices (i.e., serum, whole blood, and methanol), indicating that water-based pipetting proficiency assessment leads to a false sense of technical ability. Additionally, the events within illuminated areas for training, leading to improved imprecision and bias. It was shown that pre-rinsing (aspirating and dispensing matrix three times to coat the tip) improved bias, particularly for delivery of methanol and whole blood.

Conclusions

Precise and accurate pipetting within the clinical laboratory should not be taken for granted, nor implicitly inferred from proficiency assessment using aqueous solutions. The engaging and collegial events fostered training opportunities. Assay-specific patient sample delivery considerations (pipets and matrices) can inform the practicality of these events – the Pipetting Olympics – and drive improvements within the laboratory.

Background

Free thyroxine (FT4) measurement is one of the most requested tests in patient care for diagnosing and treating thyroid-related illnesses. Equilibrium dialysis (ED) is considered the “gold standard” for FT4 measurement; however, several factors have a profound effect on the reliability of FT4 assays and require special consideration.

Methods

In the current study, we focused on evaluating critical factors that could contribute to reporting errors, such as adsorption of thyroxine (T4) to labware surfaces, stability of serum samples, stock solutions, and calibrator storage conditions, as well as the solvents used to prepare T4 solutions.

Results

The adsorption of T4 in ethanolic solutions and dialysates to labware surfaces can be reduced with the careful selection of pipette tips, test tubes, and 96-well plates. Adding pH modifiers to neat T4 solutions can improve its stability. FT4 in serum samples remains stable after exposure to four freeze–thaw cycles, 5 °C for 18–20 h, or −70 °C for a minimum of three years.

Conclusion

The presented study has demonstrated that the loss of analyte due to pre-analytical and analytical factors during operation of the FT4 reference measurement procedure (RMP) can be minimized by careful selection of all labware for sample preparation. It was found that the accuracy and imprecision of FT4 assays can be influenced by different types of dialysis devices, but acceptable alternatives to ED membranes were identified. This study demonstrates approaches to establish a FT4 method that is independent from specific suppliers and addresses critical pre-analytical and analytical factors important for FT4 measurements.

Tandem mass spectrometry is an important analytical tool for clinical laboratories, but tests developed and validated in-house (laboratory developed tests, or LDTs) require special consideration. In late 2022, the forecast for United States (U.S.) federal regulation of LDTs changed unexpectedly when the VALID Act was not passed by the U.S. Congress. This Act would have modified the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) role to increase regulatory oversight for LDT providers. In this revised context, we review optimization of quantitative mass spectrometry LDT validation and suggest avenues other than an additional FDA mandate to achieve uniform best practice. Common challenges, logistical barriers, and recommendations for easing the burden of best-quality quantitative mass spectrometry LDT method validation are discussed.

Introduction

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of immunosuppressants is essential for optimal care of transplant patients. Immunoassays and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) are the most commonly used methods for TDM. However, immunoassays can suffer from interference from heterophile antibodies and structurally similar drugs and metabolites. Additionally, nominal-mass LC-MS assays can be difficult to optimize and are limited in the number of detectable compounds.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to implement a mass spectrometry-based test for immunosuppressant TDM using online solid-phase extraction (SPE) and accurate-mass full scan-single ion monitoring (FS-SIM) data acquisition mode.

Methods

LC-MS analysis was performed on a TLX-2 multi-channel HPLC with a Q-Exactive Plus mass spectrometer. TurboFlow online SPE was used for sample clean up. The accurate-mass MS was set to positive electrospray ionization mode with FS-SIM for quantitation of tacrolimus, sirolimus, everolimus, and cyclosporine A. MS² fragmentation pattern was used for compound confirmation.

Results

The method was validated in terms of precision, analytical bias, limit of quantitation, linearity, carryover, sample stability, and interference. Quantitation of tacrolimus, sirolimus, everolimus, and cyclosporine A correlated well with results from an independent reference laboratory (r = 0.926–0.984).

Conclusions

Accurate-mass FS-SIM can be successfully utilized for immunosuppressant TDM with good correlation with results generated by standard methods. TurboFlow online SPE allows for a simple “protein crash and shoot” sample preparation protocol. Compared to traditional MRM, analyte quantitation by FS-SIM facilitates a streamlined assay optimization process.

Mass spectrometry (MS)-based clinical proteomic Laboratory Developed Tests (LDTs) for the measurement of protein biomarkers related to endocrinology, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and Alzheimer’s disease are gaining traction in clinical laboratories due to their value in supporting diagnostic and treatment decisions for patients. Under the current regulatory landscape, MS-based clinical proteomic LDTs are regulated by Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) under the auspices of the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS). However, should the Verifying Accurate Leading-Edge In Vitro Clinical Test Development (VALID) Act pass, it will grant the FDA greater authority to oversee diagnostic tests, including LDTs. This could impede clinical laboratories' ability to develop new MS-based proteomic LDTs to support existing and emerging patient care needs. Therefore, this review discusses the currently available MS-based proteomic LDTs and their current regulatory landscape in the context of the potential impacts imposed by the passage of the VALID Act.

Introduction

Drug testing typically follows a one-size-fits-all approach that is inadequate in some clinical scenarios, such as child maltreatment, neglect, and unintentional drug exposure. Results from immunoassay-based testing, which are non-specific, insensitive, and far from comprehensive, can lead to unintended consequences for children and their families.

Objectives

The objective of this retrospective case series study is to evaluate the utility of real-time (0–1 day) comprehensive drug testing as an alternative to immunoassay-based testing in the pediatric acute care setting.

Methods

Comprehensive drug testing results obtained by mass spectrometry testing and associated medical data for all pediatric cases (0–12 years) at one institution from 2019 to 2022 were included in the analysis. The final case series (n = 7) included all cases from patients <3 years with comprehensive drug testing results that were inconsistent with medication history and/or toxicology results by immunoassay.

Results

Comprehensive drug testing by mass spectrometry was ordered for 174 urine and blood samples representing 97 patients (0–12 years) from 2019 to 2022. Of these, 76 cases were from patients <3 years old; results were consistent with medication history and confirmatory for immunoassay results (n = 34), consistent with medication history (n = 14), confirmatory for immunoassay results (n = 10), negative (n = 9), or medical history was incomplete (n = 2). The remaining 7 cases were included in the final case series.

Conclusions

The cases highlight the value of real-time comprehensive drug testing in acute pediatric cases. Testing results can rule out toxic exposure from the diagnostic differential when negative, and lead to appropriate medical and social interventions when positive.