{"title":"Criminalistic rules on the interrogation of the defendant by the representatives of the police or the public prosecutor's office through the stages of carrying out this evidentiary procedure","authors":"Ž. Mirkov","doi":"10.5937/gakv91-24873","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5937/gakv91-24873","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":52738,"journal":{"name":"Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71222916","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Sud u službi politike - slučaj izručenja Dževdeta Ajaza","authors":"Slobodan Beljanski","doi":"10.5937/gakv91-23786","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5937/gakv91-23786","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":52738,"journal":{"name":"Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71223182","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Significant damage as a substantive condition of a claim for the removal of a source of danger was not subjected to assessment in court proceedings. Although a prerequisite, the courts did not assess whether there was a threat of substantial harm in the particular cases. Considering that the Law on Environmental Protection is the basic law in the field of environmental protection, as lex specialis, it should be applied when assessing whether a particular source of danger presents a risk from which significant damage could occur. If there is a threat of significant harm in accordance with biological parameters, economic cri-teria should not be relevant in deciding whether to approve the request to remove the source of the hazard. In addition to the aforementioned general criterion, the court should consider whether the rules governing neighborhood relations are relevant between the claimant and the respondent. It is also important which area the source of danger is in, as well as which objects are endangered. Any influence beyond what is permissible will be considered relevant or significant.
{"title":"The concept of significant damage in preventive environmental protection","authors":"N. Brkić","doi":"10.5937/gakv91-24731","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5937/gakv91-24731","url":null,"abstract":"Significant damage as a substantive condition of a claim for the removal of a source of danger was not subjected to assessment in court proceedings. Although a prerequisite, the courts did not assess whether there was a threat of substantial harm in the particular cases. Considering that the Law on Environmental Protection is the basic law in the field of environmental protection, as lex specialis, it should be applied when assessing whether a particular source of danger presents a risk from which significant damage could occur. If there is a threat of significant harm in accordance with biological parameters, economic cri-teria should not be relevant in deciding whether to approve the request to remove the source of the hazard. In addition to the aforementioned general criterion, the court should consider whether the rules governing neighborhood relations are relevant between the claimant and the respondent. It is also important which area the source of danger is in, as well as which objects are endangered. Any influence beyond what is permissible will be considered relevant or significant.","PeriodicalId":52738,"journal":{"name":"Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71222881","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"NIS and The South Stream: Lost in the fog","authors":"Vladimir Medović","doi":"10.5937/gakv91-22989","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5937/gakv91-22989","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":52738,"journal":{"name":"Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71222374","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The ending of the procedure of voluntary liquidation, responsibilities and deletion of the company from the register","authors":"M. Čulić","doi":"10.5937/gakv91-23470","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5937/gakv91-23470","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":52738,"journal":{"name":"Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71222591","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper analyses the cross-examination of witnesses in criminal proceedings, mentioned first in the Constitution of 2006 and finally introduced into our legal system by the Code of Criminal Procedure of 2011. This concept of examination implies the right of a party party to criminal proceedings to examine a witness proposed by the other party. As this phase of examination of witnesses is typical for adversarial model of criminal proceedings, the paper explains the basics of witness testimony in adversarial, but also in the mixed type of criminal proceedings, followed by explanation of the characteristics of the criminal proceedings in our country, with reference to the present Code of Criminal Procedure. In order to grasp this problem in full, the paper deals with the concept of witnesses in criminal proceedings as well as the cross-examination of the witnesses, through the most important domestic and international legal sources. Lastly, the goals and types of cross-examination of witnesses are explained and practical advice for examiners is given.
{"title":"Cross-examination of witness in criminal proceedings","authors":"Tijana Đurđević","doi":"10.5937/gakv91-23647","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5937/gakv91-23647","url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses the cross-examination of witnesses in criminal proceedings, mentioned first in the Constitution of 2006 and finally introduced into our legal system by the Code of Criminal Procedure of 2011. This concept of examination implies the right of a party party to criminal proceedings to examine a witness proposed by the other party. As this phase of examination of witnesses is typical for adversarial model of criminal proceedings, the paper explains the basics of witness testimony in adversarial, but also in the mixed type of criminal proceedings, followed by explanation of the characteristics of the criminal proceedings in our country, with reference to the present Code of Criminal Procedure. In order to grasp this problem in full, the paper deals with the concept of witnesses in criminal proceedings as well as the cross-examination of the witnesses, through the most important domestic and international legal sources. Lastly, the goals and types of cross-examination of witnesses are explained and practical advice for examiners is given.","PeriodicalId":52738,"journal":{"name":"Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71222640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper explores the mechanism of representation and its core purpose, compares the regulations on representation found in the Law of Contracts and Torts and the Companies Act, and references different legal solutions. Furthermore, it discusses the term "legal (statutory) representatives" used in the Companies Act and points out the confusion caused by the use of this term in relation to other laws, as when used elsewhere it has a different meaning. In the end, we analyse the regulations found in the Companies Act, as they relate to legal (statutory) representatives of companies, other representatives, ex officio representatives, and procurators.
{"title":"Representatives of companies","authors":"S. Knezevic","doi":"10.5937/gakv92-28061","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5937/gakv92-28061","url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the mechanism of representation and its core purpose, compares the regulations on representation found in the Law of Contracts and Torts and the Companies Act, and references different legal solutions. Furthermore, it discusses the term \"legal (statutory) representatives\" used in the Companies Act and points out the confusion caused by the use of this term in relation to other laws, as when used elsewhere it has a different meaning. In the end, we analyse the regulations found in the Companies Act, as they relate to legal (statutory) representatives of companies, other representatives, ex officio representatives, and procurators.","PeriodicalId":52738,"journal":{"name":"Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71222986","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：