Pub Date : 2023-12-01DOI: 10.5325/jtheointe.17.2.0182
Christian Sanchez
This article contends that John portrays not only Jesus’s death but his entire progression to the Father (that is, his crucifixion, resurrection, and ascension) sacrificially. Discussions of Jesus’s sacrifice in John have tended to focus on Jesus’s death. Such an emphasis on death, however, coheres neither with the way John presents Jesus’s crucifixion and ascension as a singular action nor with how most ancient persons understood ritual sacrifice. It is more likely that John and his ancient audiences would have been attuned to the sacrificial connotations not only of Jesus’s death but of his arrest, trial, burial, resurrection, and ascension. By adjusting the hermeneutical category of sacrifice to agree with ancient understandings of the ritual act and its instantiations on Yom Kippur and Passover, this article traces the sacrificial logic running through John’s passion and resurrection narratives. It then concludes by demonstrating the significant social and theological implications of Jesus’s sacrifice in the Gospel of John.
{"title":"“Going to the Father” Sacrificially","authors":"Christian Sanchez","doi":"10.5325/jtheointe.17.2.0182","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jtheointe.17.2.0182","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This article contends that John portrays not only Jesus’s death but his entire progression to the Father (that is, his crucifixion, resurrection, and ascension) sacrificially. Discussions of Jesus’s sacrifice in John have tended to focus on Jesus’s death. Such an emphasis on death, however, coheres neither with the way John presents Jesus’s crucifixion and ascension as a singular action nor with how most ancient persons understood ritual sacrifice. It is more likely that John and his ancient audiences would have been attuned to the sacrificial connotations not only of Jesus’s death but of his arrest, trial, burial, resurrection, and ascension. By adjusting the hermeneutical category of sacrifice to agree with ancient understandings of the ritual act and its instantiations on Yom Kippur and Passover, this article traces the sacrificial logic running through John’s passion and resurrection narratives. It then concludes by demonstrating the significant social and theological implications of Jesus’s sacrifice in the Gospel of John.","PeriodicalId":53190,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theological Interpretation","volume":" 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138613923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-01DOI: 10.5325/jtheointe.17.2.0271
R. W. L. Moberly
{"title":"Meaning and Truth for Life Today","authors":"R. W. L. Moberly","doi":"10.5325/jtheointe.17.2.0271","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jtheointe.17.2.0271","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53190,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theological Interpretation","volume":"26 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138625069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-01DOI: 10.5325/jtheointe.17.2.0220
J. Heavin
The theological argumentation and exhortation for endurance in Heb 6:13–20 involves a notion of divine simplicity in which God’s being is God’s own perfections. In Heb 6:13–20 the Lord’s self-oath from Gen 22:16 means that God is God’s own faithfulness, swearing an oath “by himself,” having “none greater by whom to swear” in order to guarantee an “unchangeable” promise to Abraham that has been eschatologically realized in the heavenly priesthood of the risen Messiah. The first part of this article sketches conversations past and present on the doctrine of divine simplicity, from historically influential traditions to recent proposals to retrieve, revise, or abandon simplicity. The second part develops a theological interpretation of Heb 6:13–20, comparing its reading of the Akedah with Philo of Alexandria’s On Allegorical Interpretation of Genesis 3.203–208. The third part indicates how a doctrine of simplicity informed by theological interpretation of Heb 6:13–20 contributes constructive resources for Christian hope.
{"title":"Hope for Faithful Endurance: Divine Simplicity in Hebrews 6:13–20","authors":"J. Heavin","doi":"10.5325/jtheointe.17.2.0220","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jtheointe.17.2.0220","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The theological argumentation and exhortation for endurance in Heb 6:13–20 involves a notion of divine simplicity in which God’s being is God’s own perfections. In Heb 6:13–20 the Lord’s self-oath from Gen 22:16 means that God is God’s own faithfulness, swearing an oath “by himself,” having “none greater by whom to swear” in order to guarantee an “unchangeable” promise to Abraham that has been eschatologically realized in the heavenly priesthood of the risen Messiah. The first part of this article sketches conversations past and present on the doctrine of divine simplicity, from historically influential traditions to recent proposals to retrieve, revise, or abandon simplicity. The second part develops a theological interpretation of Heb 6:13–20, comparing its reading of the Akedah with Philo of Alexandria’s On Allegorical Interpretation of Genesis 3.203–208. The third part indicates how a doctrine of simplicity informed by theological interpretation of Heb 6:13–20 contributes constructive resources for Christian hope.","PeriodicalId":53190,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theological Interpretation","volume":"109 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138608782","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-01DOI: 10.5325/jtheointe.17.2.0283
David F. Ford
{"title":"Response to Professor Moberly: A New Genre of Commentary?","authors":"David F. Ford","doi":"10.5325/jtheointe.17.2.0283","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jtheointe.17.2.0283","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53190,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theological Interpretation","volume":" 43","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138620939","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-01DOI: 10.5325/jtheointe.17.2.0145
Richard J. Barry IV
In this article, I argue that the classic rabbinic interpretation of the sin of Nadab and Abihu—that they “feasted their eyes upon the Shekinah”—has strong textual support in the biblical account itself (Lev 10:1–2), which contemporary biblical scholarship helps us to see. While some recent interpreters have argued that it is impossible to know what the brothers did wrong and that the story is intentionally ambiguous, I will argue that a solid theological interpretation is possible and that the rabbis were right when they claimed that the brothers were guilty of arrogance and greed. Furthermore, recent scholarship has made it clear that the closest theological parallel to the Nadab and Abihu event is the story of Adam and Eve. Putting these stories side-by-side, one discovers fascinating echoes between them, which helps us to better understand the sin of the priestly brothers, as well as the sin of Adam and Eve, all of whom are fallen priests in garden sanctuaries. Given that both events occur at the beginning of creation (the first, the macrocosm, and the second, the microcosm), these sins have cosmic significance. By contemplating this reoccurring “original sin,” we also confront the mystery of humanity’s fallen condition and the need for redemption.
{"title":"“They Feasted Their Eyes”: Nadab, Abihu, and the Original Sin","authors":"Richard J. Barry IV","doi":"10.5325/jtheointe.17.2.0145","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jtheointe.17.2.0145","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 In this article, I argue that the classic rabbinic interpretation of the sin of Nadab and Abihu—that they “feasted their eyes upon the Shekinah”—has strong textual support in the biblical account itself (Lev 10:1–2), which contemporary biblical scholarship helps us to see. While some recent interpreters have argued that it is impossible to know what the brothers did wrong and that the story is intentionally ambiguous, I will argue that a solid theological interpretation is possible and that the rabbis were right when they claimed that the brothers were guilty of arrogance and greed. Furthermore, recent scholarship has made it clear that the closest theological parallel to the Nadab and Abihu event is the story of Adam and Eve. Putting these stories side-by-side, one discovers fascinating echoes between them, which helps us to better understand the sin of the priestly brothers, as well as the sin of Adam and Eve, all of whom are fallen priests in garden sanctuaries. Given that both events occur at the beginning of creation (the first, the macrocosm, and the second, the microcosm), these sins have cosmic significance. By contemplating this reoccurring “original sin,” we also confront the mystery of humanity’s fallen condition and the need for redemption.","PeriodicalId":53190,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theological Interpretation","volume":"116 s435","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138622513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-01DOI: 10.5325/jtheointe.17.2.0201
Jimmy Myers
In this essay, I draw attention to part of the Acts narrative that should be included in an investigation of Luke’s political stance but often gets left out: the narratives of Acts 4–5. Studies typically focus on Jesus’s trial before Pilate and Herod; Christian encounters with Roman officials in the diaspora (Philippi, Thessalonica, Athens, Corinth, and Ephesus); or Paul’s trials before Claudius Lysias, procurators, and King Agrippa II in Judea. Few give more than passing glances at these early chapters in Acts. The lacuna is, prima facie, reasonable: What, after all, does Christianity’s encounter with Jerusalem authorities have to do with Christianity’s encounter with Roman political authority? A historically textured investigation into the question, however, yields a much more complicated picture. From the time of Herod the Great till the outbreak of the Jewish war, high priests were appointed by Roman legates, prefects, and Herodian kings, and they played an important role in mediating imperial authority to the Jewish people. They thus served as representatives, in part, of the Roman state. The narratives of Acts 4–5 therefore constitute important evidence that should be included in an investigation into Luke’s theological politics because they describe Christianity’s repeated collision with the Roman-appointed priestly aristocracy. In the end, I argue that when these narratives are included, the critical volume of Luke’s theological politics becomes amplified appreciably, and the wider theological character of Luke’s political perspective comes into greater focus.
{"title":"The Politics of God: Christian Encounters with Empire in Acts 4–5","authors":"Jimmy Myers","doi":"10.5325/jtheointe.17.2.0201","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jtheointe.17.2.0201","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 In this essay, I draw attention to part of the Acts narrative that should be included in an investigation of Luke’s political stance but often gets left out: the narratives of Acts 4–5. Studies typically focus on Jesus’s trial before Pilate and Herod; Christian encounters with Roman officials in the diaspora (Philippi, Thessalonica, Athens, Corinth, and Ephesus); or Paul’s trials before Claudius Lysias, procurators, and King Agrippa II in Judea. Few give more than passing glances at these early chapters in Acts. The lacuna is, prima facie, reasonable: What, after all, does Christianity’s encounter with Jerusalem authorities have to do with Christianity’s encounter with Roman political authority? A historically textured investigation into the question, however, yields a much more complicated picture. From the time of Herod the Great till the outbreak of the Jewish war, high priests were appointed by Roman legates, prefects, and Herodian kings, and they played an important role in mediating imperial authority to the Jewish people. They thus served as representatives, in part, of the Roman state. The narratives of Acts 4–5 therefore constitute important evidence that should be included in an investigation into Luke’s theological politics because they describe Christianity’s repeated collision with the Roman-appointed priestly aristocracy. In the end, I argue that when these narratives are included, the critical volume of Luke’s theological politics becomes amplified appreciably, and the wider theological character of Luke’s political perspective comes into greater focus.","PeriodicalId":53190,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theological Interpretation","volume":"14 s2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138627301","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.5325/jtheointe.17.1.0023
Daniel J. Treier
The recent books of exegete R. W. L. Moberly (The God of the Old Testament) and theologian Darren Sarisky (Reading the Bible Theologically) provide an opportunity for taking stock of the “theological interpretation of Scripture” (hereafter TIS). Contemplating the broad hermeneutical commonalities of these two scholars, the present article will suggest that their books represent a moderate, mainstream version of TIS that is maturing out of adolescence into early adulthood. Supporting this suggestion will involve, first, setting the historical scene; second, sketching the two books’ hermeneutical contributions; and third, sharing some questions about sustaining the heritage that some TIS advocates seek to recover.
{"title":"From Adolescence to Early Adulthood: The Maturation of Theological Interpretation in the Work of R. W. L. Moberly and Darren Sarisky","authors":"Daniel J. Treier","doi":"10.5325/jtheointe.17.1.0023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jtheointe.17.1.0023","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The recent books of exegete R. W. L. Moberly (The God of the Old Testament) and theologian Darren Sarisky (Reading the Bible Theologically) provide an opportunity for taking stock of the “theological interpretation of Scripture” (hereafter TIS). Contemplating the broad hermeneutical commonalities of these two scholars, the present article will suggest that their books represent a moderate, mainstream version of TIS that is maturing out of adolescence into early adulthood. Supporting this suggestion will involve, first, setting the historical scene; second, sketching the two books’ hermeneutical contributions; and third, sharing some questions about sustaining the heritage that some TIS advocates seek to recover.","PeriodicalId":53190,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theological Interpretation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48103637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.5325/jtheointe.17.1.0059
Sara Evans
Too often in Christian circles, Levitical law is sidelined or ignored, with little attention given to the particular laws and rituals. In this article, it is argued that Leviticus is central to our proper understanding of God’s identity, particularly as displayed in the Gospel narratives. To achieve this understanding, the article proposes utilizing the epistemological framework of Michael Polanyi, whose work on knowing through participation is particularly apt for the ritual focus of Leviticus. To demonstrate the suitability of this hermeneutic, the basic tenets of Polanyi’s program are explained before applying it to the restrictions on menstruating women in Lev 15. Polanyi’s system suggests that discoveries expand upon existing knowledge and frameworks for seeing the world. With this in mind, the analysis of knowing God through Lev 15 is compared to Mark’s account of the hemorrhaging woman in Mark 5. It becomes clear that Levitical restrictions prepare both the hemorrhaging woman and the surrounding crowd to recognize Christ’s divine identity through the miracle of healing and removal of social and ritual isolation in the woman’s life. Thus, the law provides an initial framework for knowing God, which Christ eventually broadens by demonstrating God’s complete triumph over death. Finally, the article argues that participating in the rituals and overarching framework of Levitical law enables Israel to know God and provides a similar opportunity to readers of the text. Readers may participate, albeit at a distance, so they, too, may be formed to recognize God in Christ.
{"title":"Knowing God through Indwelling the Law: A Polanyian Exploration","authors":"Sara Evans","doi":"10.5325/jtheointe.17.1.0059","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jtheointe.17.1.0059","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Too often in Christian circles, Levitical law is sidelined or ignored, with little attention given to the particular laws and rituals. In this article, it is argued that Leviticus is central to our proper understanding of God’s identity, particularly as displayed in the Gospel narratives. To achieve this understanding, the article proposes utilizing the epistemological framework of Michael Polanyi, whose work on knowing through participation is particularly apt for the ritual focus of Leviticus. To demonstrate the suitability of this hermeneutic, the basic tenets of Polanyi’s program are explained before applying it to the restrictions on menstruating women in Lev 15. Polanyi’s system suggests that discoveries expand upon existing knowledge and frameworks for seeing the world. With this in mind, the analysis of knowing God through Lev 15 is compared to Mark’s account of the hemorrhaging woman in Mark 5. It becomes clear that Levitical restrictions prepare both the hemorrhaging woman and the surrounding crowd to recognize Christ’s divine identity through the miracle of healing and removal of social and ritual isolation in the woman’s life. Thus, the law provides an initial framework for knowing God, which Christ eventually broadens by demonstrating God’s complete triumph over death. Finally, the article argues that participating in the rituals and overarching framework of Levitical law enables Israel to know God and provides a similar opportunity to readers of the text. Readers may participate, albeit at a distance, so they, too, may be formed to recognize God in Christ.","PeriodicalId":53190,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theological Interpretation","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42293510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.5325/jtheointe.17.1.0126
Seth Heringer
{"title":"Preparing to Read: Theological Presuppositions and Biblical Interpretation","authors":"Seth Heringer","doi":"10.5325/jtheointe.17.1.0126","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jtheointe.17.1.0126","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53190,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theological Interpretation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48702769","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.5325/jtheointe.17.1.0092
Amy J. Erickson
This article contends that a figural reading of Luke’s passion narrative, influenced by Barth’s account of vocation, offers a heuristic for discerning contemporary callings. The first part of this study examines Barth’s theology of vocation. For Barth, one’s vocation is a dialectic of the concrete circumstances of the disciple and the dynamic, event-like nature of the call itself. Together, a disciple’s vocation is primarily a form of witness to the Christ who calls. The article then deploys Barth’s account of vocation to inform a figural reading of Luke’s passion narrative. This reading generates a renewed perception of prevailing vocational forms in the present.
{"title":"Figuring One’s Calling: A Lukan Passion Theology of Vocation in Dialogue with Karl Barth","authors":"Amy J. Erickson","doi":"10.5325/jtheointe.17.1.0092","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jtheointe.17.1.0092","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This article contends that a figural reading of Luke’s passion narrative, influenced by Barth’s account of vocation, offers a heuristic for discerning contemporary callings. The first part of this study examines Barth’s theology of vocation. For Barth, one’s vocation is a dialectic of the concrete circumstances of the disciple and the dynamic, event-like nature of the call itself. Together, a disciple’s vocation is primarily a form of witness to the Christ who calls. The article then deploys Barth’s account of vocation to inform a figural reading of Luke’s passion narrative. This reading generates a renewed perception of prevailing vocational forms in the present.","PeriodicalId":53190,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theological Interpretation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45660316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：