Pub Date : 2022-10-10DOI: 10.14712/25337637.2022.16
Martin Nitsche
The study focuses on the interpretation of the motif of unaddressed phenomena in the dialogue between Adolf Portmann’s thought and phenomenology. It establishes the closeness between Portmann and phenomenology, not in the foundation of phenomenality, but rather in employing nonaddressedness for interpreting phenomenality’s meaning. The concept of invisibility, especially in M. Merleau-Ponty and M. Henry, is considered as a phenomenological parallel to nonaddressedness. Both nonaddressedness and invisibility determine a layered perceptual environment that is based neither on representation of the perceived in a perceiving subject nor on an objective, causally interrelated system of functional relations.
{"title":"Neadresné a neviditelné. K fenomenologické interpretaci motivu „neadresných jevů“ v biologii Adolfa Portmanna","authors":"Martin Nitsche","doi":"10.14712/25337637.2022.16","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14712/25337637.2022.16","url":null,"abstract":"The study focuses on the interpretation of the motif of unaddressed phenomena in the dialogue between Adolf Portmann’s thought and phenomenology. It establishes the closeness between Portmann and\u0000phenomenology, not in the foundation of phenomenality, but rather in employing nonaddressedness for interpreting phenomenality’s meaning. The concept of invisibility, especially in M. Merleau-Ponty and M. Henry, is considered as a phenomenological parallel to nonaddressedness. Both nonaddressedness and invisibility determine a layered perceptual environment that is based neither on representation of the perceived in a perceiving subject nor on an objective, causally interrelated system of functional relations.","PeriodicalId":53484,"journal":{"name":"Reflexe","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44079101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-10DOI: 10.14712/25337637.2022.22
Suzanne Stern-Gilletová, Pavlos Kalligas
Translation of Plotinus and the Philosophical Way of Life by Suzanne Stern-Gillet and Pavlos Kalligas
苏珊·斯特恩吉列和帕夫洛斯·卡利加斯对普罗提诺和哲学人生方式的翻译
{"title":"Plótínos a filosofický způsob života (přel. O. Gál)","authors":"Suzanne Stern-Gilletová, Pavlos Kalligas","doi":"10.14712/25337637.2022.22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14712/25337637.2022.22","url":null,"abstract":"Translation of Plotinus and the Philosophical Way of Life by Suzanne Stern-Gillet and Pavlos Kalligas","PeriodicalId":53484,"journal":{"name":"Reflexe","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47751066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-10DOI: 10.14712/25337637.2022.14
Václav Sklenář
The topic of the article is the aporia of Bentham’s ethics. I point to the deeper philosophical foundations of Bentham’s ethical thought which draw on the materialist and empiricist traditions of the Enlightenment. I show how these foundations lead to a naturalistic reduction of all normative concepts, and I present the aporetic implications of this reduction with respect to the duality of Bentham’s basic ethical principle and his theory of the motivation of human action.
{"title":"Aporie Benthamovy etiky","authors":"Václav Sklenář","doi":"10.14712/25337637.2022.14","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14712/25337637.2022.14","url":null,"abstract":"The topic of the article is the aporia of Bentham’s ethics. I point to the deeper philosophical foundations of Bentham’s ethical thought which\u0000draw on the materialist and empiricist traditions of the Enlightenment.\u0000I show how these foundations lead to a naturalistic reduction of all normative concepts, and I present the aporetic implications of this reduction with respect to the duality of Bentham’s basic ethical principle and his theory of the motivation of human action.","PeriodicalId":53484,"journal":{"name":"Reflexe","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48844243","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-10DOI: 10.14712/25337637.2022.24
Ondřej Švec
A Riposte to Stanislav Sousedík’s View of Historical Facts
对斯坦尼斯拉夫·涅夫迪克历史事实观的回击
{"title":"Jako kus ztuhlé lávy. Polemika s historickými fakty v podání Stanislava Sousedíka","authors":"Ondřej Švec","doi":"10.14712/25337637.2022.24","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14712/25337637.2022.24","url":null,"abstract":"A Riposte to Stanislav Sousedík’s View of Historical Facts","PeriodicalId":53484,"journal":{"name":"Reflexe","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48993188","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-10DOI: 10.14712/25337637.2022.19
Martha Nussbaumová
Translation of The Professor of Parody. The Hip Defeatism of Judith Butler by Martha Nussbaum
《恶搞教授》的翻译。玛莎·努斯鲍姆的《朱迪思·巴特勒的失败主义》
{"title":"Profesorka parodie. Módní defétismus Judith Butlerové (přel. M. Kettner)","authors":"Martha Nussbaumová","doi":"10.14712/25337637.2022.19","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14712/25337637.2022.19","url":null,"abstract":"Translation of The Professor of Parody. The Hip Defeatism of Judith Butler by Martha Nussbaum","PeriodicalId":53484,"journal":{"name":"Reflexe","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43749374","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-10DOI: 10.14712/25337637.2022.21
Ota Gál
Introduction of the philosophy of Pavlos Kalligas
帕夫洛斯·卡利加斯哲学导论
{"title":"Z řečtiny do řečtiny. Krátce o Plótínovi a Pavlosu Kalligasovi","authors":"Ota Gál","doi":"10.14712/25337637.2022.21","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14712/25337637.2022.21","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction of the philosophy of Pavlos Kalligas","PeriodicalId":53484,"journal":{"name":"Reflexe","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48769100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Meridián Celan – Levinas. K topologii setkání skrze zlom (přel. J. Kapičiak – P. Vaškovic)","authors":"Konstantin Sigov","doi":"10.14712/25337637.2022.20","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14712/25337637.2022.20","url":null,"abstract":"Translation of Celan’s and Lévinas’ Meridian. On the Topology of Meeting-Through-a-Caesura by Konstantin Sigov","PeriodicalId":53484,"journal":{"name":"Reflexe","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48774901","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-10DOI: 10.14712/25337637.2022.15
Jindřich Karásek
Kant treats the problem of a philosophical theory of God in two basic steps. First he develops his own understanding of the notion of God by providing the doctrine of the transcendental ideal. Then he proceeds to a critique of three types of the proof of God’s existence. Thus, Kant’s „deconstruction“ of philosophical theology has a positive and a negative part. The present contribution analyses the positive part only, with the aim to supply a detailed reconstruction of Kant’s procedure here. The reconstruction proceeds in the following steps. First we have to elucidate Kant’s notion of ideal. Following Wolff’s differentiation of the three kinds of special metaphysics, Kant distinguishes three basic types of those notions of pure reason which, in an explicit reference to Plato, he names „ideas“. It must then be explained why Kant calls the theological idea, unlike the psychological and the cosmological ones, an ideal. My claim is that the difficulty of the chapter on the transcendental ideal derives from the fact that Kant, without adverting to it explicitly yet in accordance with his own methodology, develops one by one three alternative suggestions of how the notion of the transcendental ideal can be approached. These three suggestions are then investigated in three sections where I also attempt to answer the question as to why Kant defines the theological idea to be not only an ideal but also a transcendental one. In conclusion, I provide a reconstruction of Kantʼs explanation of the origin of the notion of the transcendental ideal in pure reason.
{"title":"Kantův pojem transcendentálního ideálu. Pokus o rekonstrukci","authors":"Jindřich Karásek","doi":"10.14712/25337637.2022.15","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14712/25337637.2022.15","url":null,"abstract":"Kant treats the problem of a philosophical theory of God in two basic steps. First he develops his own understanding of the notion of God by providing the doctrine of the transcendental ideal. Then he proceeds to a critique of three types of the proof of God’s existence. Thus,\u0000Kant’s „deconstruction“ of philosophical theology has a positive and\u0000a negative part. The present contribution analyses the positive part only, with the aim to supply a detailed reconstruction of Kant’s procedure here. The reconstruction proceeds in the following steps. First we have to elucidate Kant’s notion of ideal. Following Wolff’s differentiation of the three kinds of special metaphysics, Kant distinguishes three basic types of those notions of pure reason which, in an explicit reference to Plato, he names „ideas“. It must then be explained why Kant calls the theological idea, unlike the psychological and the cosmological ones, an ideal. My claim is that the difficulty of the chapter on the transcendental ideal derives from the fact that Kant, without adverting to it explicitly yet in accordance with his own methodology, develops one by one three alternative suggestions of how the notion of the transcendental ideal can be approached. These three suggestions are then investigated in three sections where I also attempt to answer the question as to why Kant defines the theological idea to be not only an ideal but also a transcendental one. In conclusion, I provide a reconstruction of Kantʼs explanation of the origin of the notion of the transcendental ideal in pure reason.","PeriodicalId":53484,"journal":{"name":"Reflexe","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47362124","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-02-28DOI: 10.14712/25337637.2022.1
Vladislav Suvák
The paper deals with three topics that could help us in attempting to understand the way Dio Chrysostom approaches the figure of Socrates and transforms it. The first part demonstrates that, with regard to Socrates, Dio prefers non-Platonic sources over Platonic ones, as he relies mainly on the Antisthenian line of Socratic literature. The second part deals with Dio’s concept of the relationship between the philosopher and the ruler, which is closely linked to his personal attitude to the Roman emperor. The third part focuses on how Dio reinterprets Socratesʼs demand for philosophical education and endows it with a Cynical character.
{"title":"Obrazy Sókrata v Diónových Řečech","authors":"Vladislav Suvák","doi":"10.14712/25337637.2022.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14712/25337637.2022.1","url":null,"abstract":"The paper deals with three topics that could help us in attempting to understand the way Dio Chrysostom approaches the figure of Socrates and transforms it. The first part demonstrates that, with regard to Socrates, Dio prefers non-Platonic sources over Platonic ones, as he relies mainly on the Antisthenian line of Socratic literature. The second part deals with Dio’s concept of the relationship between the philosopher and the ruler, which is closely linked to his personal attitude to the Roman emperor. The third part focuses on how Dio reinterprets Socratesʼs demand for philosophical education and endows it with a Cynical character.","PeriodicalId":53484,"journal":{"name":"Reflexe","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45634926","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-02-28DOI: 10.14712/25337637.2022.5
Jakub Čapek
Reflexion on the absurd at Camus and Nagel.
加缪和内格尔对荒谬的反思。
{"title":"Ber to s humorem. Camus a Nagel ve sporu o absurdno","authors":"Jakub Čapek","doi":"10.14712/25337637.2022.5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14712/25337637.2022.5","url":null,"abstract":"Reflexion on the absurd at Camus and Nagel.","PeriodicalId":53484,"journal":{"name":"Reflexe","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48551800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：