Pub Date : 2024-04-07DOI: 10.14712/25337637.2024.4
Jan Buráň
The article explores the possibilities of using civic republicanism in order to criticize Nozickian libertarianism on the ground of its own premises, especially the emphasis it puts on individual freedom. It evaluates the critique to which Nozick’s theory has been subjected to by Ian Shapiro, finding Shapiro’s objections lacking in understanding, yet valid in principle. The second line of attack is then led via the notion of freedom as non-domination (which inextricably intertwines it with democracy) and via the needs which must be satisfied in order for a state to function as a safeguard for liberty in the contemporary world of multinational corporations.
{"title":"Možnosti republikánské kritiky libertariánství","authors":"Jan Buráň","doi":"10.14712/25337637.2024.4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14712/25337637.2024.4","url":null,"abstract":"The article explores the possibilities of using civic republicanism in order to criticize Nozickian libertarianism on the ground of its own premises, especially the emphasis it puts on individual freedom. It evaluates the critique to which Nozick’s theory has been subjected to by Ian Shapiro, finding Shapiro’s objections lacking in understanding, yet valid in principle. The second line of attack is then led via the notion of freedom as non-domination (which inextricably intertwines it with democracy) and via the needs which must be satisfied in order for a state to function as a safeguard for liberty in the contemporary world of multinational corporations.","PeriodicalId":53484,"journal":{"name":"Reflexe","volume":"69 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140733179","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-07DOI: 10.14712/25337637.2024.1
Jakub Marek
The study focuses on the relationship between K. Jaspers and S. Kierkegaard. First, it evaluates the current scholarship regarding Jaspers’ reception of Kierkegaard’s thought; second, it offers an independent analysis of Jaspers’ early work (especially the 1909 Heimweh und Verbrechen, and then the Psychologie der Weltanschauungen). It is demonstrated that Jaspers’ early work on nostalgia presents the first case study of limit situations (Grenzsituationen). The paper traces the link between Kierkegaard’s conception of aesthetic existence and Jaspers’ concept of limit situations. It is shown that Jaspers’ study of nostalgia can be considered the original inspiration for the idea of limit situations, and that, at the same time, it was arguably Kierkegaard who had helped Jaspers to develop this germinal idea into a broader notion of limit situations.
本研究侧重于 K. 雅斯贝尔斯与 S. 克尔凯郭尔之间的关系。首先，它评估了目前有关雅斯贝尔斯接受克尔凯郭尔思想的学术研究；其次，它对雅斯贝尔斯的早期作品（尤其是 1909 年的《Heimweh und Verbrechen》和随后的《Psychologie der Weltanschauungen》）进行了独立分析。研究表明，雅斯贝尔斯早期关于乡愁的著作首次提出了极限情境（Grenzsituationen）的案例研究。论文追溯了克尔凯郭尔的审美存在概念与雅斯贝尔斯的极限情境概念之间的联系。研究表明，雅斯贝尔斯对乡愁的研究可以说是极限情境这一概念的最初灵感来源，同时，可以说是克尔凯郭尔帮助雅斯贝尔斯将这一萌芽的概念发展为更广泛的极限情境概念。
{"title":"Stesk po domově a mezní situace. K Jaspersově rané recepci díla S. Kierkegaarda","authors":"Jakub Marek","doi":"10.14712/25337637.2024.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14712/25337637.2024.1","url":null,"abstract":"The study focuses on the relationship between K. Jaspers and S. Kierkegaard. First, it evaluates the current scholarship regarding Jaspers’ reception of Kierkegaard’s thought; second, it offers an independent analysis of Jaspers’ early work (especially the 1909 Heimweh und Verbrechen, and then the Psychologie der Weltanschauungen). It is demonstrated that Jaspers’ early work on nostalgia presents the first case study of limit situations (Grenzsituationen). The paper traces the link between Kierkegaard’s conception of aesthetic existence and Jaspers’ concept of limit situations. It is shown that Jaspers’ study of nostalgia can be considered the original inspiration for the idea of limit situations, and that, at the same time, it was arguably Kierkegaard who had helped Jaspers to develop this germinal idea into a broader notion of limit situations.","PeriodicalId":53484,"journal":{"name":"Reflexe","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140733493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-07DOI: 10.14712/25337637.2024.16
Jakub Jirsa
Book review: Raimond Gaita, Sdílené lidství. Přemýšlení o lásce, pravdě a spravedlnosti, Červený Kostelec (Pavel Mervart), transl. Jan Petříček, 2022, 248 p.
Pub Date : 2024-04-07DOI: 10.14712/25337637.2024.3
Jindřich Karásek
The aim of this essay is to investigate various attempts at possible answers regarding the question of what is real. The basic assumption is that Kant had provided a philosophical theory of a kind such that it allows this question to be answered in a novel way. In order to show that, the philosophical conceptions of his predecessors are investigated: the metaphysical concept of A. G. Baumgarten on the one hand, the empirical concept of D. Hume on the other. The main result of the investigation is that, according to Kant, we can take something to be real only insofar as it is in a relationship to ourselves.
这篇文章的目的是探究有关 "什么是真实 "这一问题的各种可能答案的尝试。我们的基本假设是，康德已经提供了一种哲学理论，能够以一种新颖的方式回答这个问题。为了证明这一点，我们研究了康德前辈的哲学概念：一方面是鲍姆加登（A. G. Baumgarten）的形而上学概念，另一方面是休谟（D. Hume）的经验概念。研究的主要结果是，康德认为，我们只有在某物与我们自身发生关系时，才能将其视为真实。
{"title":"Co je skutečné? Ke Kantovu pojetí skutečnosti","authors":"Jindřich Karásek","doi":"10.14712/25337637.2024.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14712/25337637.2024.3","url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this essay is to investigate various attempts at possible answers regarding the question of what is real. The basic assumption is that Kant had provided a philosophical theory of a kind such that it allows this question to be answered in a novel way. In order to show that, the philosophical conceptions of his predecessors are investigated: the metaphysical concept of A. G. Baumgarten on the one hand, the empirical concept of D. Hume on the other. The main result of the investigation is that, according to Kant, we can take something to be real only insofar as it is in a relationship to ourselves.","PeriodicalId":53484,"journal":{"name":"Reflexe","volume":"50 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140733558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-07DOI: 10.14712/25337637.2024.9
Günter Figal
Czech translation of Günter Figal’s lecture Theorie und Praxis: Über die Möglichkeit ihrer klassischen Verhältnisbestimmung.
Günter Figal 演讲 Theorie und Praxis: Über die Möglichkeit ihrer klassischen Verhältnisbestimmung 的捷克语译文。
{"title":"Teorie a praxe. O možnosti klasického určení jejich vztahu","authors":"Günter Figal","doi":"10.14712/25337637.2024.9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14712/25337637.2024.9","url":null,"abstract":"Czech translation of Günter Figal’s lecture Theorie und Praxis: Über die Möglichkeit ihrer klassischen Verhältnisbestimmung.","PeriodicalId":53484,"journal":{"name":"Reflexe","volume":"49 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140733459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-02DOI: 10.14712/25337637.2023.30
Václav Němec
Book review: Tomáš Hejduk, Nepolitická politika v díle Ladislava Hejdánka, Praha (Filosofia) 2021, 455 p.
书评：Tomáš Hejduk, Nepolitická politika v díle Ladislava Hejdánek, Praha (Filosofia) 2021, 455 p.
{"title":"T. Hejduk, Nepolitická politika v díle Ladislava Hejdánka","authors":"Václav Němec","doi":"10.14712/25337637.2023.30","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14712/25337637.2023.30","url":null,"abstract":"Book review: Tomáš Hejduk, Nepolitická politika v díle Ladislava Hejdánka, Praha (Filosofia) 2021, 455 p.","PeriodicalId":53484,"journal":{"name":"Reflexe","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135902095","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：