This account is a preliminary report on the five seasons of fieldwork undertaken at a group of silver-mine surface works in the Laurion hill district of southern Attica: the aim was to recover evidence for the history and technology of the silvermines of classical Athens. Excavations were carried on between 1977 and 1983 by the British School with the approval of the Greek Archaeological Service and indeed in one season (1981) in formal co-operation with the Service. It is a pleasure to express my gratitude to Dr Hector Catling and the Staff of the British School for their constant support and practical help; to Dr N. Yalouris, then Inspector-General of the Archaeological Service, Mrs Platon and other staff at the Ministry for their support, and to Dr V. Petrakos, Ephor of Attica, Miss I. Dekoulakou, Mr A. Liangouras and Mr E. Kakavoyiannis of the Attic Ephoreia for their interest shown in various ways; to Professor H. F. Mussche, Dr Paule Spitaels and other members of the Belgian Archaeological Mission for hospitality, much help with local facilities and loan of tools; and to Professor C. E. Conophagos, Professor R. Tylecote, and Dr N. Gale for their warm interest and expert advice. It is an equal pleasure to acknowledge the generosity and financial aid, principally of the School itself and the British Academy and also, for some campaigns, of the Russell Trust, the Science Research Council, and the University College of North Wales. Particular thanks are due to all those volunteers who helped on site, to my friends and colleagues Mr Hugh Sackett and Mr David Smyth, Honorary Surveyor to the British School, and other members of the School, some of whom, such as Dr N. V. Sekunda, Mr R. Varian, and my son Rhodri Ellis Jones, participated in several campaigns. My debt is likewise great to Nikos Trikaliotis and Sotirios Dalaretos, successive foremen 'on loan' from the Belgian Mission at Thorikos and to the teams of local workmen who worked with a will on an arid and uncomfortable site.
本报告是对在阿提卡南部Laurion山区一组银矿表面工作进行的五个季节实地工作的初步报告:目的是恢复古典雅典银矿的历史和技术的证据。1977年至1983年，在希腊考古部门的批准下，英国考古学院进行了挖掘工作，并在一个季节(1981年)与该部门进行了正式合作。我很高兴向Hector Catling博士和英国学校的工作人员表示感谢，感谢他们一直以来的支持和实际帮助;感谢当时的考古总监N. Yalouris博士、Platon夫人和文化部其他工作人员的支持，并感谢阿提卡的Ephor博士V. Petrakos、I. Dekoulakou小姐、A. Liangouras先生和E. Kakavoyiannis先生对阿提卡的各种关心;感谢H. F. Mussche教授、Paule Spitaels博士和比利时考古代表团的其他成员的热情款待、对当地设施的大量帮助和工具的借用;感谢C. E. Conophagos教授、R. Tylecote教授和N. Gale博士的热情关怀和专业建议。我们同样高兴地感谢学校本身和英国科学院的慷慨和财政援助，也感谢罗素信托基金、科学研究理事会和北威尔士大学学院为一些活动提供的资助。特别感谢所有在现场提供帮助的志愿者，感谢我的朋友和同事休·萨克特先生和英国学校名誉测量师大卫·史密斯先生，以及学校的其他成员，其中一些人，如n·v·塞昆达博士、r·瓦里安先生和我的儿子罗德里·埃利斯·琼斯，参加了几次活动。同样，我要感谢从比利时驻索里科斯代表团“借调”来的几位工头Nikos Trikaliotis和Sotirios Dalaretos，也要感谢在干旱和不舒服的地方工作的当地工人团队。
{"title":"Laurion: Agrileza, 1977–1983: Excavations at a Silver-Mine Site","authors":"J. E. Jones","doi":"10.2307/581142","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/581142","url":null,"abstract":"This account is a preliminary report on the five seasons of fieldwork undertaken at a group of silver-mine surface works in the Laurion hill district of southern Attica: the aim was to recover evidence for the history and technology of the silvermines of classical Athens. Excavations were carried on between 1977 and 1983 by the British School with the approval of the Greek Archaeological Service and indeed in one season (1981) in formal co-operation with the Service. It is a pleasure to express my gratitude to Dr Hector Catling and the Staff of the British School for their constant support and practical help; to Dr N. Yalouris, then Inspector-General of the Archaeological Service, Mrs Platon and other staff at the Ministry for their support, and to Dr V. Petrakos, Ephor of Attica, Miss I. Dekoulakou, Mr A. Liangouras and Mr E. Kakavoyiannis of the Attic Ephoreia for their interest shown in various ways; to Professor H. F. Mussche, Dr Paule Spitaels and other members of the Belgian Archaeological Mission for hospitality, much help with local facilities and loan of tools; and to Professor C. E. Conophagos, Professor R. Tylecote, and Dr N. Gale for their warm interest and expert advice. It is an equal pleasure to acknowledge the generosity and financial aid, principally of the School itself and the British Academy and also, for some campaigns, of the Russell Trust, the Science Research Council, and the University College of North Wales. Particular thanks are due to all those volunteers who helped on site, to my friends and colleagues Mr Hugh Sackett and Mr David Smyth, Honorary Surveyor to the British School, and other members of the School, some of whom, such as Dr N. V. Sekunda, Mr R. Varian, and my son Rhodri Ellis Jones, participated in several campaigns. My debt is likewise great to Nikos Trikaliotis and Sotirios Dalaretos, successive foremen 'on loan' from the Belgian Mission at Thorikos and to the teams of local workmen who worked with a will on an arid and uncomfortable site.","PeriodicalId":53875,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Reports-London","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"1985-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/581142","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69064083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This report covers a far longer period than the last (AR 198586) but will be of shorter length. This is partly because the frenetic pace of research and publication in 1980-85 has—perhaps fortunately—not been maintained to quite the same pitch. Even so, F.R. Serra Ridgway in her Additional Bibliography in M. Brendel, Etruscan Art (2nd ed., Yale University Press 1995) 485-513 lists 404 items, most of them published after 1985; and these are books only, though she refers in passing to many articles in her introductory discussion. This treatment, far broader than one simply on 'art', updates her previous one in JRA 4 (1991) 5-27—that is to say, the discussion part is essentially the same, but the bibliography is expanded. Herein lies another reason why this report can enjoy a certain brevity: for a succinct account of developments in Etruscan studies, and especially for an account of the plethora of recent museum catalogues, exhibitions and conference proceedings, see Serra Ridgway. The aim here will not be to attempt a comprehensive account of archaeological work over a very long period, but to focus on some of the excavations and topographical studies that have achieved particularly interesting and notable results, including some that have been in progress for a long time and should perhaps have been mentioned in previous reports. Bibliographical abbreviations are given on the inside front cover. In February 1995 Massimo Pallottino, father, grandfather, godfather of modern Etruscan studies died in Rome at the age of 85. His pupils now hold many of the top archaeological chairs in Italy and beyond, and their pupils in turn are becoming eminent in the field. Tributes have appeared in the relevant journals. Among many varied gifts, Pallottino had a supreme knack of synthesis, which made his innumerable opening and closing addresses at colloquia of all kinds particularly apposite and hardly ever perfunctory. Last time around events were dominated by the Progetto Etruschi, sometimes referred to as the Year of the Etruscans —something of a misnomer for the project was to rumble on and embrace exhibitions staged over the next few years. The major publishing event of the end of the decade was the proceedings of the conference held to coincide with the exhibitions of 1985: Atti del II Congr. Intern. Etr. (Florence 1989). The rolling programme of Studi Etruschi ed Italici meetings (as regards those that are published) has in recent years rolled to Civita Castellana for the 15th convegno (CF, 1990), to Orbetello for the 16th (La coroplastica templare etrusca fra il IV e il II secolo a.C, 1992), and Chiusi for the 17th (La civilta di Chiusi e del suo territorio, 1993). Generally speaking the mainstream Italian archaeological periodicals are rather slow in keeping up with their publishing schedules. Studi Etruschi continues to be a major voice; its scavi e scoperte section has a shifting focus covering the whole peninsula, and 1992 was when it last concentrate
本报告涵盖的时期远长于上一份(AR 198586)，但篇幅较短。部分原因是1980- 1985年间研究和出版的狂热步伐——也许是幸运的——没有保持在同样的高度。即便如此，F.R. Serra Ridgway在她的M. Brendel补充书目中，伊特鲁里亚艺术(第二版，耶鲁大学出版社1995年)485-513列出了404个项目，其中大多数是在1985年之后出版的;这些只是书，尽管她在她的介绍性讨论中顺便提到了许多文章。这种处理，远比简单的“艺术”更广泛，更新了她之前在JRA 4(1991) 5-27中的处理，也就是说，讨论部分本质上是相同的，但参考书目被扩展了。这里还有另一个原因，为什么这份报告可以享受一定的简洁:伊特鲁里亚研究的发展的简洁描述，特别是最近的大量博物馆目录，展览和会议记录的描述，见Serra Ridgway。本文的目的不是试图全面介绍一段很长时间内的考古工作，而是着重于一些已经取得特别有趣和显著成果的发掘和地形研究，包括一些已经进行了很长时间的研究，也许应该在以前的报告中提到。参考书目的缩写在内页的封面上给出。1995年2月，父亲、祖父、现代伊特鲁里亚研究教父马西莫·帕洛蒂诺在罗马去世，享年85岁。他的学生现在在意大利和其他国家担任许多顶级考古职位，他们的学生也在这个领域崭露头角。相关刊物上刊登了对他的颂词。在各种各样的天赋中，帕洛蒂诺有一种高超的综合技巧，这使得他在各种学术研讨会上无数的开场白和结束语特别贴切，从不敷衍。上一次的活动是由伊特鲁里亚人主导的，有时也被称为伊特鲁里亚人年——这个项目在接下来的几年里会继续进行，并举办各种展览，这有点用词不当。十年结束时的主要出版事件是与1985年展览会同时举行的会议论文集:Atti del II Congr。实习生。Etr。佛罗伦萨(1989)。近年来，研究伊特鲁西奇和意大利会议(关于已出版的会议)的滚动计划已在奇维塔卡斯泰拉举行了第15届会议(CF, 1990年)，在奥尔贝特洛举行了第16届会议(La coroplastica templare etrusca fra IV和II secolo a.C, 1992年)，在丘西举行了第17届会议(La civilta di Chiusi e del suo territorio, 1993年)。总的来说，意大利主流考古期刊的出版进度相当缓慢。Studi Etruschi仍然是一个主要的声音;它的scavi - scoscote部分的重点已经转移到覆盖整个半岛，1992年是它最后一次集中在伊特鲁里亚的中心地带。一个新来者是Bollettino di Archeologia(始于1990年)，它由所有意大利高级官员的报告组成。同样值得关注的还有一些意大利月刊，其中最好的——尤其是彩色图片的质量——是《Archeo》(1985年出版)。正如塞拉·里奇韦(Serra Ridgway)所指出的那样，完整的挖掘报告现在相当少，而且相隔很远，调查报告也是如此。田野调查，直到十几年前，往往是来自英语世界的考古学家的专属，在意大利人眼里充其量是一种边缘活动。从G. Barker和J. Lloyd(主编)的《罗马景观》(1992)的内容以及最近的PFCIA的内容中可以清楚地看出，它现在已经在意大利考古学家中流行起来。调查不是万灵药，只有与其他考古方法相结合才能达到最佳效果;有些问题它可以很好地回答，有些问题它不能单独回答(G. Barker, PFCIA, 1-11)。在任何调查中，明确使用的方法也是必要的(但这并不总是发生)(地形是如何采样的，野外行走的强度是多少)，关于由于植被而无法检查的区域，以及关于测年标准(公元前5世纪遗址与公元前4世纪遗址的区别是什么?)等等)。否则，你最终会在地图上看到一系列的点，不知道它们是如何形成的，也不知道它们是打算代表整个画面还是只是一个代表性的画面。托斯卡纳的调查无疑比近年来在伊特鲁里亚土壤上进行的许多调查要好或差(G. Barker和T. Rasmussen, PBSR 56 [1988]， 25-42;T. Rasmussen, Barker和Lloyd[上图]，104-114)，但是所涉及的大面积区域以几种不同和互补的方式进行采样，使用正式和纯粹主观的标准(关于方法:G. Barker, A. Grant和T. Rasmussen, P。 本报告涵盖的时期远长于上一份(AR 198586)，但篇幅较短。部分原因是1980- 1985年间研究和出版的狂热步伐——也许是幸运的——没有保持在同样的高度。即便如此，F.R. Serra Ridgway在她的M. Brendel补充书目中，伊特鲁里亚艺术(第二版，耶鲁大学出版社1995年)485-513列出了404个项目，其中大多数是在1985年之后出版的;这些只是书，尽管她在她的介绍性讨论中顺便提到了许多文章。这种处理，远比简单的“艺术”更广泛，更新了她之前在JRA 4(1991) 5-27中的处理，也就是说，讨论部分本质上是相同的，但参考书目被扩展了。这里还有另一个原因，为什么这份报告可以享受一定的简洁:伊特鲁里亚研究的发展的简洁描述，特别是最近的大量博物馆目录，展览和会议记录的描述，见Serra Ridgway。本文的目的不是试图全面介绍一段很长时间内的考古工作，而是着重于一些已经取得特别有趣和显著成果的发掘和地形研究，包括一些已经进行了很长时间的研究，也许应该在以前的报告中提到。参考书目的缩写在内页的封面上给出。1995年2月，父亲、祖父、现代伊特鲁里亚研究教父马西莫·帕洛蒂诺在罗马去世，享年85岁。他的学生现在在意大利和其他国家担任许多顶级考古职位，他们的学生也在这个领域崭露头角。相关刊物上刊登了对他的颂词。在各种各样的天赋中，帕洛蒂诺有一种高超的综合技巧，这使得他在各种学术研讨会上无数的开场白和结束语特别贴切，从不敷衍。上一次的活动是由伊特鲁里亚人主导的，有时也被称为伊特鲁里亚人年——这个项目在接下来的几年里会继续进行，并举办各种展览，这有点用词不当。十年结束时的主要出版事件是与1985年展览会同时举行的会议论文集:Atti del II Congr。实习生。Etr。佛罗伦萨(1989)。近年来，研究伊特鲁西奇和意大利会议(关于已出版的会议)的滚动计划已在奇维塔卡斯泰拉举行了第15届会议(CF, 1990年)，在奥尔贝特洛举行了第16届会议(La coroplastica templare etrusca fra IV和II secolo a.C, 1992年)，在丘西举行了第17届会议(La civilta di Chiusi e del suo territorio, 1993年)。总的来说，意大利主流考古期刊的出版进度相当缓慢。Studi Etruschi仍然是一个主要的声音;它的scavi - scoscote部分的重点已经转移到覆盖整个半岛，1992年是它最后一次集中在伊特鲁里亚的中心地带。一个新来者是Bollettino di Archeologia(始于1990年)，它由所有意大利高级官员的报告组成。同样值得关注的还有一些意大利月刊，其中最好的——尤其是彩色图片的质量——是《Archeo》
{"title":"Archaeology in Etruria 1985-95","authors":"T. Rasmussen","doi":"10.2307/581054","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/581054","url":null,"abstract":"This report covers a far longer period than the last (AR 198586) but will be of shorter length. This is partly because the frenetic pace of research and publication in 1980-85 has—perhaps fortunately—not been maintained to quite the same pitch. Even so, F.R. Serra Ridgway in her Additional Bibliography in M. Brendel, Etruscan Art (2nd ed., Yale University Press 1995) 485-513 lists 404 items, most of them published after 1985; and these are books only, though she refers in passing to many articles in her introductory discussion. This treatment, far broader than one simply on 'art', updates her previous one in JRA 4 (1991) 5-27—that is to say, the discussion part is essentially the same, but the bibliography is expanded. Herein lies another reason why this report can enjoy a certain brevity: for a succinct account of developments in Etruscan studies, and especially for an account of the plethora of recent museum catalogues, exhibitions and conference proceedings, see Serra Ridgway. The aim here will not be to attempt a comprehensive account of archaeological work over a very long period, but to focus on some of the excavations and topographical studies that have achieved particularly interesting and notable results, including some that have been in progress for a long time and should perhaps have been mentioned in previous reports. Bibliographical abbreviations are given on the inside front cover. In February 1995 Massimo Pallottino, father, grandfather, godfather of modern Etruscan studies died in Rome at the age of 85. His pupils now hold many of the top archaeological chairs in Italy and beyond, and their pupils in turn are becoming eminent in the field. Tributes have appeared in the relevant journals. Among many varied gifts, Pallottino had a supreme knack of synthesis, which made his innumerable opening and closing addresses at colloquia of all kinds particularly apposite and hardly ever perfunctory. Last time around events were dominated by the Progetto Etruschi, sometimes referred to as the Year of the Etruscans —something of a misnomer for the project was to rumble on and embrace exhibitions staged over the next few years. The major publishing event of the end of the decade was the proceedings of the conference held to coincide with the exhibitions of 1985: Atti del II Congr. Intern. Etr. (Florence 1989). The rolling programme of Studi Etruschi ed Italici meetings (as regards those that are published) has in recent years rolled to Civita Castellana for the 15th convegno (CF, 1990), to Orbetello for the 16th (La coroplastica templare etrusca fra il IV e il II secolo a.C, 1992), and Chiusi for the 17th (La civilta di Chiusi e del suo territorio, 1993). Generally speaking the mainstream Italian archaeological periodicals are rather slow in keeping up with their publishing schedules. Studi Etruschi continues to be a major voice; its scavi e scoperte section has a shifting focus covering the whole peninsula, and 1992 was when it last concentrate","PeriodicalId":53875,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Reports-London","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"1985-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/581054","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69062716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The previous report, Part II (AR ig82—8j, 63—87), presented the main evidence of the site from Late Minoan II to Sub-Minoan/Early Protogeometric. Part III is concerned with the subsequent occupation through the independent Greek period down to and including Hellenistic. Part IV will deal with the Roman period. I am most grateful to Professor J. N. Coldstream and Dr P. Callaghan for help with the Geometric-Orientalizing and Classical-Hellenistic pottery respectively. The most notable feature of the Greek Iron Age occupation is the absence of building remains from the end of Sub-Minoan (or possibly Early Protogeometric) around 970 B.C. until Hellenistic in the later 3rd century, the evidence for the long intervening period comprising mainly wells and pits. It is unlikely that Hellenistic and Roman builders would have removed every trace of buildings of the previous centuries, or that all buildings would have been of mudbrick, without stone foundations. The Iron Age remains above the Minoan Unexplored Mansion east of our site were more plentiful, but there too little of actual buildings was preserved other than a roadway with a terrace wall (Sackett, AR IQ72—73, 62—4). It is probable therefore that the built urban area of the city at this time lay further to the east, towards the central zone where the Minoan palace had once been. A classical building that is likely to have stood in the region of our site, perhaps higher to the west, was a 5 th century B.C. temple; a metope depicting Herakles and Eurystheus was found in 1910 close to or on the site, reused as a Roman drain cover (Benton, JHS lvii [1937] 38—43; Hood and Smyth, Archaeological Survey of the Knossos Area [ 1981J 44, no. 132).
先前的报告第二部分(AR ig82-8j, 63-87)提出了该遗址从晚米诺斯II到亚米诺斯/早期原始地理测量的主要证据。第三部分是关于随后的占领，从独立的希腊时期一直到希腊化。第四部分将讨论罗马时期。我非常感谢J. N. Coldstream教授和P. Callaghan博士分别对几何东方化和古典希腊化陶器的帮助。希腊铁器时代占领的最显著特征是，从公元前970年左右的亚米诺斯(或可能是早期原始几何)末期到3世纪晚期的希腊化时期，没有建筑遗迹，这段漫长的中间时期的证据主要包括井和坑。希腊和罗马的建筑者不太可能把前几个世纪建筑的所有痕迹都清除掉，也不可能所有的建筑都是用泥砖建造的，没有石头地基。在我们遗址以东的米诺斯未开发大厦上方，铁器时代的遗迹更为丰富，但除了一条带有露台墙的道路之外，实际保存下来的建筑太少了(Sackett, AR iq72 - 73,62 - 4)。因此，很可能这个时候，城市的建筑城区位于更远的东部，朝着米诺斯宫殿曾经所在的中心地带。在我们的遗址所在地区，可能有一座古典建筑矗立在更高的西边，那是一座公元前5世纪的寺庙;1910年，在遗址附近或遗址上发现了描绘赫拉克勒斯和欧律斯修斯的墙面，重新用作罗马排水沟盖(Benton, JHS lvii [1937] 38-43;胡德和史密斯，克诺索斯地区的考古调查[1981J 44, no. 11]。132)。
{"title":"Knossos: Stratigraphical Museum Excavations, 1978–82. Part III","authors":"P. Warren","doi":"10.2307/581143","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/581143","url":null,"abstract":"The previous report, Part II (AR ig82—8j, 63—87), presented the main evidence of the site from Late Minoan II to Sub-Minoan/Early Protogeometric. Part III is concerned with the subsequent occupation through the independent Greek period down to and including Hellenistic. Part IV will deal with the Roman period. I am most grateful to Professor J. N. Coldstream and Dr P. Callaghan for help with the Geometric-Orientalizing and Classical-Hellenistic pottery respectively. The most notable feature of the Greek Iron Age occupation is the absence of building remains from the end of Sub-Minoan (or possibly Early Protogeometric) around 970 B.C. until Hellenistic in the later 3rd century, the evidence for the long intervening period comprising mainly wells and pits. It is unlikely that Hellenistic and Roman builders would have removed every trace of buildings of the previous centuries, or that all buildings would have been of mudbrick, without stone foundations. The Iron Age remains above the Minoan Unexplored Mansion east of our site were more plentiful, but there too little of actual buildings was preserved other than a roadway with a terrace wall (Sackett, AR IQ72—73, 62—4). It is probable therefore that the built urban area of the city at this time lay further to the east, towards the central zone where the Minoan palace had once been. A classical building that is likely to have stood in the region of our site, perhaps higher to the west, was a 5 th century B.C. temple; a metope depicting Herakles and Eurystheus was found in 1910 close to or on the site, reused as a Roman drain cover (Benton, JHS lvii [1937] 38—43; Hood and Smyth, Archaeological Survey of the Knossos Area [ 1981J 44, no. 132).","PeriodicalId":53875,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Reports-London","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"1985-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/581143","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69064140","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Since 1978, straitened economic circumstances may have forced some of the long-term excavations in Asia Minor to operate on a smaller scale than in previous years, but the number of smaller projects has continued to grow (Fig. 1). To keep pace with this there has been an important new development in the publication of interim reports. Every year, since 1979, the Turkish Department of Antiquities (T. C. Kiiltiir Bakanhgi, Eski Eserler ve Miizeler Genel Mudiirlugu), under its director Dr Nurettin Yardimci, has organised a colloquium to hear reports on the preceding year's excavations. The proceedings of these colloquia have been published about a year after the meetings, and these volumes, TV Kazi Sonuflan Toplantisi (1979—84) ( = 1 Kazi Toplantisi etc.) now provide the most complete summary account of current developments. Most of the reports are illustrated and there has been a notable improvement in the quality of plans and photographs since the third volume. In 1983 a research section, I Arastirma Sonuflan Toplantisi (publ. 1984) was organised alongside the fifth excavation conference. The proceedings of the sixth excavation, and second research conference, held in Izmir in spring 1984, are due to appear shortly. Illustrated reports on excavations continue to be found in Turk Arkeoloji Dergisi (TAD), 25.1 (1980, publ. 1981), 25.2 (1981, publ. 1982), 26.1 (1982), and 26.2 (1983). An index to TAD i— 25.1 (1933—81), listing authors, places and subjects, has also appeared, compiled by M. Akif I§ik. Shorter accounts of sites appear in 'Recent Archaeological Research in Turkey', an annual feature of Anatolian Studies, but the fullest survey of each year's work remains M. J. Mellink's 'Archaeology in Asia Minor' for the years 1978-83, which has appeared in AJA 83 (1979)—88 (1984). New journals, containing well-illustrated articles on subjects of general interest, are Yayla, published from Newcastle by the Northern Society for Anatolian Archaeology, and the Turkish Arkeoloji ve Sanat Dergisi. My principal guide to other published work is the Archdologische Bibliographie of the DAI (vols 1979—83). In addition to information found in published reports I am immensely grateful to colleagues who have sent news of their work, or have helped in other ways, in particular to Dr W. Radt, Prof. W. Miiller-Wiener, Prof. K. Tuchelt, Prof. D. de Bernardi Ferrero, Dr C. le Roy, Prof. R. Naumann, Dr Marc Waelkens, Prof. C. Ozgunel, Prof. J. Russell, Prof. C. Greenewalt, Prof. B. Ogiin, and Prof. K. Erim. It is a particular pleasure to thank Prof. J. M. Cook for offprints and information. I am also indebted to many of the excavation directors and their teams for hospitality and for explaining current work at the sites themselves: Dr Radt at Pergamum, Prof. Greenewalt at Sardis, Prof. H. Vetters at Ephesus, Prof. Miiller-Wiener at Miletus, Prof. Tuchelt at Didyma, Prof. Kenan Erim at Aphrodisias, Prof. Jale Inan at Perge and Side, Bay Orhan Atvur at the agora of Side, a
自1978年以来，经济环境的紧缩可能迫使小亚细亚的一些长期挖掘活动规模小于前几年，但小型项目的数量继续增长(图1)。为了跟上这一步伐，中期报告的出版出现了重要的新发展。自1979年以来，土耳其古物部(T. C. Kiiltiir Bakanhgi, Eski Eserler ve Miizeler Genel Mudiirlugu)在其主任Nurettin Yardimci博士的领导下，每年都会组织一次讨论会，听取前一年发掘工作的报告。这些讨论会的会议记录大约在会议一年后出版，这些卷，TV Kazi Sonuflan Toplantisi (1979-84) (= 1 Kazi Toplantisi等)现在提供了对当前发展的最完整的摘要说明。大多数报告都附有插图，自第三卷以来，平面图和照片的质量有了显著改善。1983年，一个研究小组，I蒿属植物的Sonuflan Toplantisi(公开)。1984年)与第五次发掘会议同时举办。1984年春在伊兹密尔举行的第六次发掘和第二次研究会议的记录将很快公布。在土耳其的Arkeoloji Dergisi (TAD)， 25.1(1980年)中继续发现有关挖掘的插图报告。1981)， 25.2 (1981, public。1982)， 26.1(1982)和26.2(1983)。还出现了由M. Akif i . ik编写的TAD i - 25.1(1933-81)索引，其中列出了作者、地点和主题。《安纳托利亚研究》(Anatolian Studies)的年度特刊《土耳其近期考古研究》(Recent Archaeological Research in Turkey)刊登了较短的遗址描述，但对每年工作的最全面调查仍是M. J. Mellink在1978- 1983年间撰写的《小亚细亚考古》(Archaeology in Minor Asia)，发表在AJA 83(1979) -88(1984)。新期刊《Yayla》和土耳其《Arkeoloji ve Sanat Dergisi》分别由安那托利亚北方考古学会在纽卡斯尔出版，其中包含了一些大众感兴趣的、配有精美插图的文章。我对其他出版作品的主要指导是DAI的考古学参考书目(vol 1979-83)。除了在已发表的报告中找到的信息外，我非常感谢那些将他们的工作消息发送给我或以其他方式提供帮助的同事，特别是W. Radt博士、W. miller - wiener教授、K. Tuchelt教授、D. de Bernardi Ferrero教授、C. le Roy博士、R. Naumann教授、Marc Waelkens博士、C. Ozgunel教授、J. Russell教授、C. Greenewalt教授、B. Ogiin教授和K. Erim教授。我特别高兴地感谢j·m·库克教授提供的印本和资料。我也要感谢许多发掘主管和他们的团队的热情款待，以及他们对现场工作的解释:帕加马的Radt博士、萨迪斯的Greenewalt教授、以弗所的H. vetter教授、米利都的miller - wiener教授、迪迪马的Tuchelt教授、阿芙洛狄西亚斯的Kenan Erim教授、佩尔格和赛德的Jale Inan教授、赛德广场的Bay Orhan Atvur教授和佩西努斯的Waelkens博士。我也非常感谢斯旺西计算机中心大学学院的格温·彭尼·埃文斯，她使我有可能编写这份关于学院Prime计算机的文字处理设施的报告，从而极大地加快了报告的制作。应注意以下缩写:ANRW Aufstieg和Niedergang der romischen Welt Anz。维恩。《德国每日新闻》。德国科学与技术学院。疤痕的。《Antike Welt AS Anatolian Studies BASOR》，美国东方研究学会会刊(英文版)，《中国科学院学报》第1期。手套。德国考古研究所，伊斯坦布尔Byz。拜占庭帝国
{"title":"Archaeology in Asia Minor 1979–84","authors":"S. Mitchell","doi":"10.2307/581141","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/581141","url":null,"abstract":"Since 1978, straitened economic circumstances may have forced some of the long-term excavations in Asia Minor to operate on a smaller scale than in previous years, but the number of smaller projects has continued to grow (Fig. 1). To keep pace with this there has been an important new development in the publication of interim reports. Every year, since 1979, the Turkish Department of Antiquities (T. C. Kiiltiir Bakanhgi, Eski Eserler ve Miizeler Genel Mudiirlugu), under its director Dr Nurettin Yardimci, has organised a colloquium to hear reports on the preceding year's excavations. The proceedings of these colloquia have been published about a year after the meetings, and these volumes, TV Kazi Sonuflan Toplantisi (1979—84) ( = 1 Kazi Toplantisi etc.) now provide the most complete summary account of current developments. Most of the reports are illustrated and there has been a notable improvement in the quality of plans and photographs since the third volume. In 1983 a research section, I Arastirma Sonuflan Toplantisi (publ. 1984) was organised alongside the fifth excavation conference. The proceedings of the sixth excavation, and second research conference, held in Izmir in spring 1984, are due to appear shortly. Illustrated reports on excavations continue to be found in Turk Arkeoloji Dergisi (TAD), 25.1 (1980, publ. 1981), 25.2 (1981, publ. 1982), 26.1 (1982), and 26.2 (1983). An index to TAD i— 25.1 (1933—81), listing authors, places and subjects, has also appeared, compiled by M. Akif I§ik. Shorter accounts of sites appear in 'Recent Archaeological Research in Turkey', an annual feature of Anatolian Studies, but the fullest survey of each year's work remains M. J. Mellink's 'Archaeology in Asia Minor' for the years 1978-83, which has appeared in AJA 83 (1979)—88 (1984). New journals, containing well-illustrated articles on subjects of general interest, are Yayla, published from Newcastle by the Northern Society for Anatolian Archaeology, and the Turkish Arkeoloji ve Sanat Dergisi. My principal guide to other published work is the Archdologische Bibliographie of the DAI (vols 1979—83). In addition to information found in published reports I am immensely grateful to colleagues who have sent news of their work, or have helped in other ways, in particular to Dr W. Radt, Prof. W. Miiller-Wiener, Prof. K. Tuchelt, Prof. D. de Bernardi Ferrero, Dr C. le Roy, Prof. R. Naumann, Dr Marc Waelkens, Prof. C. Ozgunel, Prof. J. Russell, Prof. C. Greenewalt, Prof. B. Ogiin, and Prof. K. Erim. It is a particular pleasure to thank Prof. J. M. Cook for offprints and information. I am also indebted to many of the excavation directors and their teams for hospitality and for explaining current work at the sites themselves: Dr Radt at Pergamum, Prof. Greenewalt at Sardis, Prof. H. Vetters at Ephesus, Prof. Miiller-Wiener at Miletus, Prof. Tuchelt at Didyma, Prof. Kenan Erim at Aphrodisias, Prof. Jale Inan at Perge and Side, Bay Orhan Atvur at the agora of Side, a","PeriodicalId":53875,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Reports-London","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"1985-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/581141","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69064002","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This is the first report on Albanian archaeology to appear in AR. Its preparation and submission were agreed during a visit which M. F. Smith made to Albania in the summer of 1983 at the invitation of the Centre for Archaeological Research in Tirana and with the support of the British Academy. Professor Smith, who has edited and adapted the report, wishes to thank both these bodies, as well as the author, for their generous co-operation and assistance.
{"title":"Archaeology in Albania, 1973–83","authors":"Zhaneta Andrea","doi":"10.2307/581034","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/581034","url":null,"abstract":"This is the first report on Albanian archaeology to appear in AR. Its preparation and submission were agreed during a visit which M. F. Smith made to Albania in the summer of 1983 at the invitation of the Centre for Archaeological Research in Tirana and with the support of the British Academy. Professor Smith, who has edited and adapted the report, wishes to thank both these bodies, as well as the author, for their generous co-operation and assistance.","PeriodicalId":53875,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Reports-London","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"1984-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/581034","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69062423","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Greek and Barbarian Peoples on the Shores of the Black Sea","authors":"J. Hind","doi":"10.2307/581032","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/581032","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53875,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Reports-London","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"1984-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/581032","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69061741","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Large-scale investigations of the remains of the classical period were conducted on the eastern Black Sea littoral (Georgian SSR), in the area of ancient Kolchis (Fig. i). The field work was carried out by the Republic's leading archaeological institution the Centre for Archaeological Studies of the Institute of History, Archaeology and Ethnography of the Academy of Sciences of the Georgian SSR, and the S. Janashia State Museum of Georgia, the Art Museum of Georgia, the Batumi Research Institute and the D. Gulia Abkhazian Institute of Language, Literature and History. The findings of the investigations are published in the annual collection Field Archaeological Studies (=FAS; in Russian), in serial publications: Archaeological Expeditions of the State Museum of Georgia ( = AESMG; in Georgian), Remains of South-Western Georgia (=RSIVG; in Georgian, with summaries in Russian), Archaeological Investigations at the Construction Sites of Georgia ( = AICSG; in Russian), Vani: Archaeological Excavations ( = Vani; in Georgian, with summaries in Russian and English), Great Pitiunt: Archaeological Excavations at Bichvinta ( = Great Pitiunt; in Georgian, with summaries in Russian and English), as well as in monographs devoted to separate remains, etc.
{"title":"Archaeological Investigations on the Eastern Black Sea Littoral, 1970–80","authors":"D. Kacharava","doi":"10.2307/581033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/581033","url":null,"abstract":"Large-scale investigations of the remains of the classical period were conducted on the eastern Black Sea littoral (Georgian SSR), in the area of ancient Kolchis (Fig. i). The field work was carried out by the Republic's leading archaeological institution the Centre for Archaeological Studies of the Institute of History, Archaeology and Ethnography of the Academy of Sciences of the Georgian SSR, and the S. Janashia State Museum of Georgia, the Art Museum of Georgia, the Batumi Research Institute and the D. Gulia Abkhazian Institute of Language, Literature and History. The findings of the investigations are published in the annual collection Field Archaeological Studies (=FAS; in Russian), in serial publications: Archaeological Expeditions of the State Museum of Georgia ( = AESMG; in Georgian), Remains of South-Western Georgia (=RSIVG; in Georgian, with summaries in Russian), Archaeological Investigations at the Construction Sites of Georgia ( = AICSG; in Russian), Vani: Archaeological Excavations ( = Vani; in Georgian, with summaries in Russian and English), Great Pitiunt: Archaeological Excavations at Bichvinta ( = Great Pitiunt; in Georgian, with summaries in Russian and English), as well as in monographs devoted to separate remains, etc.","PeriodicalId":53875,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Reports-London","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"1984-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/581033","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69061859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This report continues directly from Part I(AR IQ80-81, 73-92), describing the sequence of occupation from Late Minoan II to Sub-Minoan/Early Protogeometric. For these periods it takes account of the whole excavation from 1978 to 1982. Again any conclusions are still preliminary; the excavation vase catalogue stands at 1,200, but large quantities of sherd material are to be studied and work on faunal and palaeobotanical remains is in progress. Part III of the preliminary report will cover the Geometric to Roman periods, together with a supplementary account of Middle Minoan I to Late Minoan I discoveries made since Part I appeared. The plan tracings used here are again the work of the School's Honorary Surveyor, Mr D. Smyth. Pottery drawings are by Mrs A. Thomas, Mrs J. Bees and Mr W. Schenck. I am most grateful to Mr M. R. Popham for beneficial advice, information and discussion of the first group of Sub-Minoan vases described. The trench layout of the excavation, to which references are made, appears at Fig. 1.
{"title":"Knossos: Stratigraphical Museum Excavations, 1978–82. Part II","authors":"Peter Warren","doi":"10.2307/581161","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/581161","url":null,"abstract":"This report continues directly from Part I(AR IQ80-81, 73-92), describing the sequence of occupation from Late Minoan II to Sub-Minoan/Early Protogeometric. For these periods it takes account of the whole excavation from 1978 to 1982. Again any conclusions are still preliminary; the excavation vase catalogue stands at 1,200, but large quantities of sherd material are to be studied and work on faunal and palaeobotanical remains is in progress. Part III of the preliminary report will cover the Geometric to Roman periods, together with a supplementary account of Middle Minoan I to Late Minoan I discoveries made since Part I appeared. The plan tracings used here are again the work of the School's Honorary Surveyor, Mr D. Smyth. Pottery drawings are by Mrs A. Thomas, Mrs J. Bees and Mr W. Schenck. I am most grateful to Mr M. R. Popham for beneficial advice, information and discussion of the first group of Sub-Minoan vases described. The trench layout of the excavation, to which references are made, appears at Fig. 1.","PeriodicalId":53875,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Reports-London","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"1983-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/581161","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69064408","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1983-01-31DOI: 10.1515/9783110824575.519
Donald Preziosi
Dodecanese and the eastern Aegean Machaira, V. (2011) Ελληνιστικά γλυπτά της Ρόδου – Κατάλογος, Τόμος Ι (Athens) Poupaki, Ε.Α. (2011) Αλάσαρνα ΙΙ. Λίθινα αγγεία, χειρόμυλοι και άλλα τέχνεργα από το Ιερό του Απόλλωνα και τον παλαιοχριστιανικό οικισμό στην Καρδάμαινα (αρχ. Αλάσαρνα) της Κω (Athens) Stampolidis, N.C., Tassoulas, Y. and Filimonos-Tsopotou, M. (eds) (2011) Islands off the Beaten Track. An Archaeological Journey to the Greek Islands of Kastellorizo, Symi, Halki, Tilos and Nisyros (Athens)
{"title":"Index of Sites","authors":"Donald Preziosi","doi":"10.1515/9783110824575.519","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110824575.519","url":null,"abstract":"Dodecanese and the eastern Aegean Machaira, V. (2011) Ελληνιστικά γλυπτά της Ρόδου – Κατάλογος, Τόμος Ι (Athens) Poupaki, Ε.Α. (2011) Αλάσαρνα ΙΙ. Λίθινα αγγεία, χειρόμυλοι και άλλα τέχνεργα από το Ιερό του Απόλλωνα και τον παλαιοχριστιανικό οικισμό στην Καρδάμαινα (αρχ. Αλάσαρνα) της Κω (Athens) Stampolidis, N.C., Tassoulas, Y. and Filimonos-Tsopotou, M. (eds) (2011) Islands off the Beaten Track. An Archaeological Journey to the Greek Islands of Kastellorizo, Symi, Halki, Tilos and Nisyros (Athens)","PeriodicalId":53875,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Reports-London","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"1983-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/9783110824575.519","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67005548","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Martin Frederiksen's report on South Italy and Sicily 1973-76 (AR. ^76-77, 43-76) was hailed by all who read it as the first of a classic series. In the event, it is also the last. AR is but one algebraic indication of the loss entailed by his tragically premature death in July 1980. Among the others are BSR, CAH and JRS; all gained immeasurably from the life and example of a generous scholar, teacher, friend and commuter between Oxford and Naples. His unique personality created a bond between the two countries of his adoption to an extent rarely sought and never achieved through merely formal channels. Official obituaries can only hint at this (JRS lxx [1980] p. ix; PBSR xlviii [1980] 1-5), and at the feelings of those who had enjoyed the privilege of his company. 'Napoli non e piu Napoli senza Martino' is the dominant theme in conversations with his South Italian friends, who cherish the memories that Callimachus knew:
马丁·弗雷德里克森(Martin Frederiksen)关于南意大利和西西里岛的报告(1973-76)被所有读过它的人誉为经典系列的第一部。在这种情况下，这也是最后一次。AR只是他1980年7月悲剧性的过早死亡所带来的损失的一个代数迹象。其中包括BSR、CAH和JRS;所有人都从这位慷慨的学者、老师、朋友和牛津和那不勒斯之间的通勤者的生活和榜样中受益匪浅。他独特的个性在收养他的两个国家之间建立了一种纽带，这种纽带在某种程度上很少寻求，也从未通过正式渠道实现过。官方讣告只能暗示这一点(JRS lxx [1980] p. ix;PBSR xlviii[1980] 1-5)，以及那些曾经享受过他公司特权的人的感受。“Napoli non e piu Napoli senza Martino”是他与南意大利朋友谈话的主要主题，他们珍惜卡利马科斯所知道的回忆:
{"title":"Archaeology in South Italy, 1977–81","authors":"D. Ridgway","doi":"10.2307/581188","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/581188","url":null,"abstract":"Martin Frederiksen's report on South Italy and Sicily 1973-76 (AR. ^76-77, 43-76) was hailed by all who read it as the first of a classic series. In the event, it is also the last. AR is but one algebraic indication of the loss entailed by his tragically premature death in July 1980. Among the others are BSR, CAH and JRS; all gained immeasurably from the life and example of a generous scholar, teacher, friend and commuter between Oxford and Naples. His unique personality created a bond between the two countries of his adoption to an extent rarely sought and never achieved through merely formal channels. Official obituaries can only hint at this (JRS lxx [1980] p. ix; PBSR xlviii [1980] 1-5), and at the feelings of those who had enjoyed the privilege of his company. 'Napoli non e piu Napoli senza Martino' is the dominant theme in conversations with his South Italian friends, who cherish the memories that Callimachus knew:","PeriodicalId":53875,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Reports-London","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"1982-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/581188","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69064902","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：