The scope of work on Classical Archaeology in Asia Minor has expanded considerably in the five years since the last report (see Fig. 1, and compare AR 1984-85 70-105). A full collection of reports on each year's field work appears in two series of volumes, the Kazi Sonuglan Toplantisi and the Arastirma Sonuglan Toplantisi. These are the published records of the annual Symposia organized by the Department of Antiquities (formerly the Eski Eserler ve Miizeler Genel Mudurlugii, now the Anitlar ve Miizeler Genel Mudurlugii = General Directorate for Monuments and Museums) at which researchers are required to present the results of the previous year's activities. Thus an oral report is delivered to the Symposium between six and ten months after completion of field work, and a published version appears a year later. VI Kazi Sonuglan Toplantisi, published in spring 1985, contains the reports presented to the 1984 Symposium on all the excavations which took place in Turkey in 1983. // Arastirma Sonuglan Toplantisi, published at the same time, contains accounts of surveys and other research activity excluding excavation carried out in 1983. The two series have continued annually and the latest volumes to appear are XI Kazi Sonuglan Toplantisi and VII Arastirma Sonuglan Toplantisi, which appeared in spring 1990 and report on the activities of 1988. In addition since 1985 there has been an Archaeometry section of the Symposium, whose findings have been published in I-V Arkeometri Sonuglan Toplantisi. For reports on the 1989 field season I have occasionally relied on the brief summaries circulated to participants at the 1990 Symposium. The increase in field work has been such that volumes VIII to XI in the excavation series, and volume V of the research series have been published in two parts. The only officially authorized field work which is not recorded in these volumes is a small number of minor excavations carried out by local museums. Unfortunately many of these are never reported in print at all. This admirably prompt system of publication has one significant drawback for foreign archaeologists and scholars, namely the fact that most of the articles are in Turkish.
自上一份报告以来，小亚细亚古典考古学的工作范围在五年内大大扩大(见图1，并比较AR 1984-85 70-105)。每年的实地工作报告的完整集合出现在两卷丛书中，即Kazi Sonuglan Toplantisi和Arastirma Sonuglan Toplantisi。这些是古物部(以前是Eski Eserler ve Miizeler Genel Mudurlugii，现在是Anitlar ve Miizeler Genel Mudurlugii =古迹和博物馆总局)组织的年度专题讨论会的出版记录，研究人员被要求在会上介绍前一年活动的结果。因此，在实地工作完成后6至10个月内向专题讨论会提交口头报告，一年后出版。1985年春出版的VI Kazi Sonuglan Toplantisi载有向1984年专题讨论会提交的关于1983年在土耳其进行的所有发掘工作的报告。//同时出版的《Arastirma Sonuglan Toplantisi》载有1983年进行的调查和其他研究活动的记录，但不包括挖掘。这两个丛书每年继续出版，最新出版的两卷是1990年春出版的《Kazi Sonuglan Toplantisi》和《Arastirma Sonuglan Toplantisi》，报告了1988年的活动。此外，自1985年以来，研讨会还开设了一个考古测量部分，其发现已发表在I-V Arkeometri Sonuglan Toplantisi上。关于1989年实地季节的报告，我偶尔依靠1990年专题讨论会上分发给与会者的简要摘要。实地工作的增加使发掘丛书的第八至十一卷和研究丛书的第五卷分两部分出版。唯一官方授权但未记录在这些卷中的实地工作是由当地博物馆进行的少量小型发掘。不幸的是，其中许多从未在印刷品上报道过。这种令人钦佩的快速出版系统对外国考古学家和学者来说有一个重大的缺点，即大多数文章都是土耳其语。
{"title":"Archaeology in Asia Minor 1985-1989","authors":"S. Mitchell","doi":"10.2307/581028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/581028","url":null,"abstract":"The scope of work on Classical Archaeology in Asia Minor has expanded considerably in the five years since the last report (see Fig. 1, and compare AR 1984-85 70-105). A full collection of reports on each year's field work appears in two series of volumes, the Kazi Sonuglan Toplantisi and the Arastirma Sonuglan Toplantisi. These are the published records of the annual Symposia organized by the Department of Antiquities (formerly the Eski Eserler ve Miizeler Genel Mudurlugii, now the Anitlar ve Miizeler Genel Mudurlugii = General Directorate for Monuments and Museums) at which researchers are required to present the results of the previous year's activities. Thus an oral report is delivered to the Symposium between six and ten months after completion of field work, and a published version appears a year later. VI Kazi Sonuglan Toplantisi, published in spring 1985, contains the reports presented to the 1984 Symposium on all the excavations which took place in Turkey in 1983. // Arastirma Sonuglan Toplantisi, published at the same time, contains accounts of surveys and other research activity excluding excavation carried out in 1983. The two series have continued annually and the latest volumes to appear are XI Kazi Sonuglan Toplantisi and VII Arastirma Sonuglan Toplantisi, which appeared in spring 1990 and report on the activities of 1988. In addition since 1985 there has been an Archaeometry section of the Symposium, whose findings have been published in I-V Arkeometri Sonuglan Toplantisi. For reports on the 1989 field season I have occasionally relied on the brief summaries circulated to participants at the 1990 Symposium. The increase in field work has been such that volumes VIII to XI in the excavation series, and volume V of the research series have been published in two parts. The only officially authorized field work which is not recorded in these volumes is a small number of minor excavations carried out by local museums. Unfortunately many of these are never reported in print at all. This admirably prompt system of publication has one significant drawback for foreign archaeologists and scholars, namely the fact that most of the articles are in Turkish.","PeriodicalId":53875,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Reports-London","volume":"36 1","pages":"83 - 131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"1990-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/581028","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69061681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
La necropole de Lefkandi (Eubee) a continue de livrer de nombreux objets, dont des importations : ainsi un bol en bronze repousse et grave, avec une frise de sphinx ailes et casques affrontes de part et d'autre d'arbres de vie, provenant peut-etre du nord de la Syrie| une situle en bronze a grand bec, sans parallele connu, mais nettement du Proche-Orient, sinon d'Egypte| un vase en forme de grenade, un bol en faience, un scarabee, un sceau egyptien, des pendentifs, des perles
{"title":"Further Excavation of the Toumba Cemetery at Lefkandi, 1984 and 1986, a Preliminary Report","authors":"M. Popham, P. Calligas, L. Sackett","doi":"10.2307/581081","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/581081","url":null,"abstract":"La necropole de Lefkandi (Eubee) a continue de livrer de nombreux objets, dont des importations : ainsi un bol en bronze repousse et grave, avec une frise de sphinx ailes et casques affrontes de part et d'autre d'arbres de vie, provenant peut-etre du nord de la Syrie| une situle en bronze a grand bec, sans parallele connu, mais nettement du Proche-Orient, sinon d'Egypte| un vase en forme de grenade, un bol en faience, un scarabee, un sceau egyptien, des pendentifs, des perles","PeriodicalId":53875,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Reports-London","volume":"35 1","pages":"117 - 129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"1989-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/581081","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69062945","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
INTRODUCTION The two sections of this report have not been combined before in AR. In compiling them, I have been acutely aware that it would have been possible and probably easier to devote the space I have for six years' work in two areas to every year in each area. I have, to put it mildly, been highly selective; and where selection is the result of human frailty, whether my own or that of others, I have not hesitated to bow to the inevitable. The two treatments I have prepared below are very different in character. SARDINIA is still essentially terra incognita to all but the most enterprising classical archaeologists. I have therefore paid particular attention to recent advances that illustrate the island's crucial role in episodes hitherto regarded as the exclusive preserve of Aegean specialists—notably the activities of the Bronze Age entrepreneurs from Cyprus and the Levant who (I believe) paved the way for the first Western Greeks of the 8th century. Greek SOUTH ITALY, on the other hand, has long been basically familiar in the outside world—and is more so now than it was when Professor Trendall inaugurated these Reports a generation ago. Accordingly, in the reduced space that I have allowed myself for the flourishing classical scene in Campania, Apulia, Basilicata and Calabria, I have usually refrained from summarizing information that is already published: abstracts can never be a substitute for the real thing, and least of all for scholars and students whose institutions (particularly in Britain) can no longer afford to subscribe to even the main journals. Where I have had a choice, I have opted for news of projects that illustrate the methodological kinship that is increasingly being sought between classical and non-classical archaeology: hence the pictures of urban rescue in Naples and notes on field survey around Croton.
{"title":"Archaeology in Sardinia and South Italy, 1983–88","authors":"D. Ridgway","doi":"10.2307/581082","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/581082","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION The two sections of this report have not been combined before in AR. In compiling them, I have been acutely aware that it would have been possible and probably easier to devote the space I have for six years' work in two areas to every year in each area. I have, to put it mildly, been highly selective; and where selection is the result of human frailty, whether my own or that of others, I have not hesitated to bow to the inevitable. The two treatments I have prepared below are very different in character. SARDINIA is still essentially terra incognita to all but the most enterprising classical archaeologists. I have therefore paid particular attention to recent advances that illustrate the island's crucial role in episodes hitherto regarded as the exclusive preserve of Aegean specialists—notably the activities of the Bronze Age entrepreneurs from Cyprus and the Levant who (I believe) paved the way for the first Western Greeks of the 8th century. Greek SOUTH ITALY, on the other hand, has long been basically familiar in the outside world—and is more so now than it was when Professor Trendall inaugurated these Reports a generation ago. Accordingly, in the reduced space that I have allowed myself for the flourishing classical scene in Campania, Apulia, Basilicata and Calabria, I have usually refrained from summarizing information that is already published: abstracts can never be a substitute for the real thing, and least of all for scholars and students whose institutions (particularly in Britain) can no longer afford to subscribe to even the main journals. Where I have had a choice, I have opted for news of projects that illustrate the methodological kinship that is increasingly being sought between classical and non-classical archaeology: hence the pictures of urban rescue in Naples and notes on field survey around Croton.","PeriodicalId":53875,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Reports-London","volume":"35 1","pages":"130 - 147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"1989-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/581082","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69063003","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Knossos Part IV gives an account of the Late Hellenistic and Roman periods on the site, following upon the SubMinoan/Early Protogeometric-Hellenistic Part HI (AR 1984-85, 124-29). As before, the account is provisional. Catalogued vases of all periods stand (April 1988) at 1,841 and over half of a total unlikely to be less than 15,000 kg. of sherds has been studied. Study of the remainder is progressing and may require modification of details in the present report. For instruction in dating a number of Roman pieces I am very grateful to Dr J.W. Hayes and Mr L.H. Sackett. Mr Sackett has been specially helpful in providing parallel pieces from the much richer 1st and 2nd century A.D. levels over the Unexplored Mansion to the east. Drs D.J. Thompson and MJ. Price kindly dated the coins and Dr Jennifer Price identified and dated catalogued pieces of glass. Plan tracings in Figs. 1, 24 and 50 are the work of Mr David Smyth. It is intended that a final preliminary report, Part V, will present the main evidence for some substantial Minoan deposits, MMIALMIB, discovered and studied since Part I (AR 1980-81, 73-92). After an absence of buildings, though not of pits and wells, from around Late Protogeometric to about 250— 225 B.C., we find an expansion of the city in later Hellenistic times and building occupation, probably continuous, to at least the 2nd century A.D., followed by 4th and perhaps 5th century constructions. The surviving movable artefacts were not rich and good floor deposits were almost non-existent. The reason for this was that successive building levels often removed predecessors down to the foundations, while the ground slope down from west to east and the consequent and constant need for north-south retaining walls added to the stratigraphical complexity. Full interpretation of buildings is, therefore, not easy and sometimes not possible. Nevertheless this segment of Knossian late Hellenistic and Roman urban life does yield a number of interesting products.
克诺索斯第四部分在SubMinoan/早期原始地理-希腊化部分HI (AR 1984- 85,124 -29)之后，对该遗址的晚期希腊化和罗马化时期进行了描述。和以前一样，这个帐户是临时的。所有时期已编目的花瓶(1988年4月)有1,841个，其中一半以上的重量不可能低于15,000公斤。对碎片进行了研究。对其余部分的研究正在进行中，可能需要修改本报告中的细节。我非常感谢j·w·海斯博士和l·h·萨克特先生为我指明了一些罗马文物的年代。萨基特先生在提供公元1世纪和2世纪更为丰富的未开发大厦东面的平行作品方面提供了特别的帮助。D.J.汤普森博士和MJ博士。普莱斯好心地为这些硬币注明了年代，詹妮弗·普莱斯博士对玻璃碎片进行了鉴定和注明了年代。图1、图24和图50中的平面图是David Smyth先生的作品。打算在最后的初步报告(第五部分)中提出自第一部分以来发现和研究的一些大量米诺斯矿藏(MMIALMIB)的主要证据(1980-81、73-92年)。从原始几何后期到公元前250 - 225年，没有建筑，但没有坑洞和井，我们发现在希腊化时代晚期，城市的扩张和建筑占领，可能持续到至少公元2世纪，随后是4世纪和5世纪的建筑。现存的可移动文物并不丰富，良好的地面沉积物几乎不存在。这样做的原因是，连续的建筑水平通常会将之前的建筑移到地基上，而地面从西向东倾斜，因此不断需要南北方向的挡土墙，这增加了地层的复杂性。因此，对建筑进行全面解读并不容易，有时甚至是不可能的。然而，这段克诺森晚期希腊和罗马城市生活确实产生了许多有趣的产品。
{"title":"Knossos: Stratigraphical Museum Excavations, 1978–82. Part IV","authors":"P. Warren","doi":"10.2307/581127","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/581127","url":null,"abstract":"Knossos Part IV gives an account of the Late Hellenistic and Roman periods on the site, following upon the SubMinoan/Early Protogeometric-Hellenistic Part HI (AR 1984-85, 124-29). As before, the account is provisional. Catalogued vases of all periods stand (April 1988) at 1,841 and over half of a total unlikely to be less than 15,000 kg. of sherds has been studied. Study of the remainder is progressing and may require modification of details in the present report. For instruction in dating a number of Roman pieces I am very grateful to Dr J.W. Hayes and Mr L.H. Sackett. Mr Sackett has been specially helpful in providing parallel pieces from the much richer 1st and 2nd century A.D. levels over the Unexplored Mansion to the east. Drs D.J. Thompson and MJ. Price kindly dated the coins and Dr Jennifer Price identified and dated catalogued pieces of glass. Plan tracings in Figs. 1, 24 and 50 are the work of Mr David Smyth. It is intended that a final preliminary report, Part V, will present the main evidence for some substantial Minoan deposits, MMIALMIB, discovered and studied since Part I (AR 1980-81, 73-92). After an absence of buildings, though not of pits and wells, from around Late Protogeometric to about 250— 225 B.C., we find an expansion of the city in later Hellenistic times and building occupation, probably continuous, to at least the 2nd century A.D., followed by 4th and perhaps 5th century constructions. The surviving movable artefacts were not rich and good floor deposits were almost non-existent. The reason for this was that successive building levels often removed predecessors down to the foundations, while the ground slope down from west to east and the consequent and constant need for north-south retaining walls added to the stratigraphical complexity. Full interpretation of buildings is, therefore, not easy and sometimes not possible. Nevertheless this segment of Knossian late Hellenistic and Roman urban life does yield a number of interesting products.","PeriodicalId":53875,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Reports-London","volume":"34 1","pages":"86 - 104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"1988-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/581127","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69063907","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Archaeology in Sicily, 1982–87","authors":"R. J. A. Wilson","doi":"10.2307/581128","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/581128","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53875,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Reports-London","volume":"34 1","pages":"105 - 150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"1988-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/581128","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69064295","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The following report summarizes the principal archaeological activities on Cyprus in the years 1981-85. For various reasons it has had to be compiled in a very short space of time and cannot, therefore, be as full as might be wished. The information on excavations and museum acquisitions has been condensed from the reports submitted annually to the Bulletin de Correspondance Hellenique by Dr Vassos Karageorghis, Director for the Department of Antiquities. I am also grateful to Dr. Karageorghis for sending photographs at short notice. Unfortunately these were delayed in the post beyond the printer's deadline. Further photographs have been supplied by Dr R. J. A. Wilson, Dr E. J. Peltenburg and Professor F. G. Maier. An attempt has been made to supply as much extra bibliographic information as possible but this is by no means complete. Much more bibliographic detail can be obtained from L. Ieronomachou's 'Cypriote Bibliography: Archaeology 1979-1981', RDAC 1982, 260-69 (for the start of the period covered here) and from the comprehensive bibliographies given in Archaeology In Cyprus 1960-1985, V. Karageorghis, ed. (Nicosia, 1985), which also contains a general bibliography covering the years 1935-85. again compiled by L. Ieronomachou. See also S. Swiny, 'Recent Developments in Cypriot Prehistoric Archaeology', American Journal of Archaeology 89 (1985), 39-51. Dr E. J. Peltenburg has kindly helped with bibliographical information. I am also grateful to Pamela Magrill for her invaluable assistance in the preparation of this report. Despite the continuing armed occupation of the north of the island by the Turkish government the pace of archaeological investigation on Cyprus has continued to grow in these years. Archaeological missions from Britain, America, France, Sweden, Canada, Switzerland and Poland have all been active. The Department of Antiquities has conducted major excavations (see below) at Amathus, Kourion, Kato Paphos, Maa Palaeokastro, Pyla Kokkinokremos and Alassa and has carried out rescue excavations throughout the island (particularly in response to tourist development at Kato Paphos and Amathus). In addition the Department has pursued an active policy of restoration on monuments of all periods including the Temple of Apollo Hylates at Kourion (Fig. 1), the house of Hadjigeorghakis in Nicosia (see RDAC 1985, 350-63) and the House of Aion at Kato Paphos. Particular attention has been given to churches, mosques and traditional architecture (see RDAC 1984, 354— 74). A special exhibition was mounted in the Cyprus Museum in 1985 to mark the fiftieth anniversary of the Department and was opened by the President of the Republic. In addition a mediaeval museum has been opened in Limassol Castle and additions made to the Yeroskipou Folk Art Museum. Further details of the Department's activities will be found in the Annual Report of the Director of Antiquities for the relevant years.
以下报告概述了1981- 1985年塞浦路斯的主要考古活动。由于种种原因，它必须在很短的时间内完成，因此不能像人们所希望的那样完整。有关发掘和博物馆收购的资料是由古物部主任Vassos Karageorghis博士每年向《希腊通讯公报》提交的报告浓缩而成的。我也感谢卡拉吉奥吉斯博士在接到通知后很短时间内寄来照片。不幸的是，这些被延迟在邮寄超过打印机的最后期限。进一步的照片由R. J. A. Wilson博士、E. J. Peltenburg博士和F. G. Maier教授提供。已尝试提供尽可能多的额外书目信息，但这绝不是完整的。更多的参考书目细节可以从L. Ieronomachou的“塞浦路斯参考书目:考古学1979-1981”，RDAC 1982, 260-69(此处所述时期的开始)和V. Karageorghis编辑的《1960-1985年塞浦路斯考古学》(尼科西亚，1985)中获得，其中还包含了1935-85年的一般参考书目。再次由L. Ieronomachou编译。参见S. Swiny，“塞浦路斯史前考古的最新发展”，《美国考古学杂志》89(1985)，39-51。E. J. Peltenburg博士热心地提供了参考书目信息。我还要感谢帕梅拉·马格里尔在编写本报告中所提供的宝贵协助。尽管土耳其政府继续武装占领塞浦路斯岛北部，但近年来对塞浦路斯进行考古调查的步伐继续加快。来自英国、美国、法国、瑞典、加拿大、瑞士和波兰的考古考察团都很活跃。古物部在阿玛索斯、库里翁、加托帕福斯、马帕古卡斯特罗、皮拉Kokkinokremos和阿拉萨进行了重大发掘(见下文)，并在全岛各地进行了抢救性发掘(特别是为了响应加托帕福斯和阿玛索斯的旅游发展)。此外，该部还采取了积极的政策，修复所有时期的纪念物，包括库里昂的阿波罗海拉提斯神庙(图1)、尼科西亚的哈德吉格奥基斯之家(见RDAC 1985, 350-63)和加东帕福斯的爱昂之家。特别注意的是教堂、清真寺和传统建筑(见RDAC 1984年，354 - 74)。1985年在塞浦路斯博物馆举办了一次特别展览，以纪念该部成立五十周年，并由共和国总统主持开幕。此外，利马索尔城堡还开设了一座中世纪博物馆，并对耶罗斯基普民间艺术博物馆进行了扩建。有关年份本署活动的详情，请参阅古物署署长的年报。
{"title":"Archaeology in Cyprus, 1981–85","authors":"D. Symons","doi":"10.2307/581086","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/581086","url":null,"abstract":"The following report summarizes the principal archaeological activities on Cyprus in the years 1981-85. For various reasons it has had to be compiled in a very short space of time and cannot, therefore, be as full as might be wished. The information on excavations and museum acquisitions has been condensed from the reports submitted annually to the Bulletin de Correspondance Hellenique by Dr Vassos Karageorghis, Director for the Department of Antiquities. I am also grateful to Dr. Karageorghis for sending photographs at short notice. Unfortunately these were delayed in the post beyond the printer's deadline. Further photographs have been supplied by Dr R. J. A. Wilson, Dr E. J. Peltenburg and Professor F. G. Maier. An attempt has been made to supply as much extra bibliographic information as possible but this is by no means complete. Much more bibliographic detail can be obtained from L. Ieronomachou's 'Cypriote Bibliography: Archaeology 1979-1981', RDAC 1982, 260-69 (for the start of the period covered here) and from the comprehensive bibliographies given in Archaeology In Cyprus 1960-1985, V. Karageorghis, ed. (Nicosia, 1985), which also contains a general bibliography covering the years 1935-85. again compiled by L. Ieronomachou. See also S. Swiny, 'Recent Developments in Cypriot Prehistoric Archaeology', American Journal of Archaeology 89 (1985), 39-51. Dr E. J. Peltenburg has kindly helped with bibliographical information. I am also grateful to Pamela Magrill for her invaluable assistance in the preparation of this report. Despite the continuing armed occupation of the north of the island by the Turkish government the pace of archaeological investigation on Cyprus has continued to grow in these years. Archaeological missions from Britain, America, France, Sweden, Canada, Switzerland and Poland have all been active. The Department of Antiquities has conducted major excavations (see below) at Amathus, Kourion, Kato Paphos, Maa Palaeokastro, Pyla Kokkinokremos and Alassa and has carried out rescue excavations throughout the island (particularly in response to tourist development at Kato Paphos and Amathus). In addition the Department has pursued an active policy of restoration on monuments of all periods including the Temple of Apollo Hylates at Kourion (Fig. 1), the house of Hadjigeorghakis in Nicosia (see RDAC 1985, 350-63) and the House of Aion at Kato Paphos. Particular attention has been given to churches, mosques and traditional architecture (see RDAC 1984, 354— 74). A special exhibition was mounted in the Cyprus Museum in 1985 to mark the fiftieth anniversary of the Department and was opened by the President of the Republic. In addition a mediaeval museum has been opened in Limassol Castle and additions made to the Yeroskipou Folk Art Museum. Further details of the Department's activities will be found in the Annual Report of the Director of Antiquities for the relevant years.","PeriodicalId":53875,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Reports-London","volume":"33 1","pages":"62 - 77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"1987-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/581086","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69063074","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The first museum dedicated primarily to Cycladic art was opened on 20th January, 1986 in Athens by the Minister of Culture, Mrs Melina Mercouri. The Nicholas P. Goulandris Museum of Cycladic and Ancient Greek Art, located at 4 Neophytou Douka St, Athens 106.74 in the Kolonaki district, will now be the permanent home of the important collection formed by Mrs Dolly Goulandris and her husband the late Nicholas P. Goulandris. The Cycladic part of the collection has been shown in Washington, London, Paris and Tokyo as well as in the Benaki Museum in 1978 when the Ancient Greek collections were also displayed. These have now been significantly augmented, while the Cycladic collection has been enhanced by a very remarkable monumental sculpture which clearly constitutes a major addition to the Cycladic repertoire. The museum, built specially to house the Goulandris collection, and the installation of the exhibits, are themselves of considerable interest from the museological standpoint.
1986年1月20日，文化部长Melina Mercouri夫人在雅典为第一个主要致力于基克拉迪艺术的博物馆开馆。Nicholas P. Goulandris基克拉迪和古希腊艺术博物馆位于雅典Kolonaki区106.74 Neophytou Douka St 4号，现在将成为Dolly Goulandris夫人和她已故的丈夫Nicholas P. Goulandris重要收藏品的永久收藏地。这些藏品的基克拉迪部分曾在华盛顿、伦敦、巴黎和东京展出，1978年在贝纳基博物馆也展出了古希腊藏品。这些收藏品现在已经大大增加，而基克拉迪的收藏品又增加了一个非常引人注目的纪念性雕塑，这显然是对基克拉迪收藏品的重要补充。从博物馆学的角度来看，这座专门为Goulandris收藏而建造的博物馆和展品的安装本身就相当有趣。
{"title":"The Goulandris Museum of Cycladic and Ancient Greek Art","authors":"C. Renfrew","doi":"10.2307/581099","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/581099","url":null,"abstract":"The first museum dedicated primarily to Cycladic art was opened on 20th January, 1986 in Athens by the Minister of Culture, Mrs Melina Mercouri. The Nicholas P. Goulandris Museum of Cycladic and Ancient Greek Art, located at 4 Neophytou Douka St, Athens 106.74 in the Kolonaki district, will now be the permanent home of the important collection formed by Mrs Dolly Goulandris and her husband the late Nicholas P. Goulandris. The Cycladic part of the collection has been shown in Washington, London, Paris and Tokyo as well as in the Benaki Museum in 1978 when the Ancient Greek collections were also displayed. These have now been significantly augmented, while the Cycladic collection has been enhanced by a very remarkable monumental sculpture which clearly constitutes a major addition to the Cycladic repertoire. The museum, built specially to house the Goulandris collection, and the installation of the exhibits, are themselves of considerable interest from the museological standpoint.","PeriodicalId":53875,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Reports-London","volume":"32 1","pages":"134 - 141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"1986-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/581099","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69063613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：