Nowadays patients affected by deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) are studied widely but the challenge for physicians is when and how they are to be treated. Most patients present serious comorbidities that can potentially make treatment difficult. An increasing cohort of patients cannot be treated with systemic fibrinolysis but fortunately today, physicians can utilize a number of different instruments to resolve acute DVT and PE.
Foot ulcers associated with Diabetes mellitus require immediate attention due to risk of amputation if left untreated. Herein we focus on the mitigating risk factors and physiopathology of the diabetic foot, recounting our own surgical approach and revascularization procedures.
Diabetic ulceration of the foot is a major global medical, social and economic problem and is the most frequent end-point of diabetic complications. A retrospective analysis from February 2017 to May 2019 of diabetic patients presenting below-the-knee artery disease (PAD) was carried out. Only patients treated with endovascular techniques as first choice treatment were evaluated. Outcome measured was perioperative mortality and morbidity. Freedom from occlusion, secondary patency and amputation rate were all registered. Additional maneuvers including stenting or angioplasty with drug eluting balloon (DEB) were reported. A total of 167 (101 male/66 female) patients with a mean age of 71 years were included in the study. A Rutherford 3, 4, 5 and 6 categories were reported in 5, 7, 110 and 45 patients, respectively. No perioperative mortality was reported. Morbidity occurred in 4 (4.4%) cases and consisted of pseudoaneurysm. Additional stenting during first procedure was required in 7 (4%) patients, drug eluting balloon was needed in 56 (33%) patients. At 1-year follow-up, estimated freedom from occlusion and secondary patency was 70% and 80% respectively. Major amputation rate was 2.4%, minor amputation rate was 41.9%. In our experience, extreme revascularization in search of distal direct flow reduce the rate of amputations with an increase in ulcer healing. New materials and techniques such as drug eluting technology, used properly, can improve outcome.
Background: Flebogrif® (Balton, Poland) is a novel mechanochemical ablation (MOCA) device for saphenous vein insufficiency. It combines endothelial damage performed by radial retractable cutting hooks together with chemical ablation through sclerosant injection of 3% polidocanol foam according to its IFU. The objective of this study is to evaluate Flebogrif's efficacy in terms of recanalization rate and recurrence by varying polidocanol foam concentrations.
Methods: We performed 24 MOCAs on 23 patients with Flebogrif® between January and May 2019. In 12 cases the polidocanol foam was prepared at a 3% concentration, and in another 12 at 1.5%. Great saphenous vein (GSV) recanalization and truncular recurrence were evaluated at 1 and 3 months with a Duplex Ultrasound Anatomy (DUS) examination.
Results: At 1- and 3-month follow-ups, none of the 14 patients treated with the polidocanol 3% foam were observed to have had great saphenous vein GSV recanalization and truncular recurrence. Only 2 of the 14 (14.3%) cases treated with polidocanol 1.5% foam showed evidence of recanalization within the first centimetres from the sapheno-femoral junction (p > .05). All patients experienced clinical benefits without recurrence of symptoms.
Conclusion: MOCA with Flebogrif® is a safe, relatively inexpensive and effective alternative to standard methods in the treatment of saphenous insufficiency with encouraging short-term results. Despite our relatively small patient sample, no statistical significance in evidence of recurrence in the group of patients treated with 3% foam and those treated with 1.5% foam was noted. Longer term analysis of GSV patency and recurrence is necessary to further evaluate Flebogrif's impact and actual indications in the treatment of chronic venous disease.
New digital technologies can have a huge impact on the traditional healthcare sector, both from a clinical and economic perspective. Doctors and health specialists will increasingly need technology to improve the services they provide to their patients. Here a novel patented device for automatic processing of clinical data of chronic poly-pathological patients is presented. The invention consists of a reconfigurable equipment that allows the assessment of clinical risk severity indexes that can be customized for polypathological patients and which acts both as a decision support system for specialist doctors in the diagnosis and treatment phases, and as a monitoring system in the clinical environment.
Surgical access complications during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) are reported relatively frequent. HARMONIC FOCUS® (HF; Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio, USA) is a device developed to improve bleeding control and reduce heat-related damage stemming from surgical preparation. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes and safety of HF versus conventional haemostasis with electrocautery, both techniques used in the same patient. Five patients developed bilateral wound's thickening (13.9%) demonstrated at the CT scan, two of whom had no clinical manifestation while in three cases the thickening was associated with lymphocele (4.54%), 2 of which were in the side where the EC was used (5.5%), and 1 case (2.7%), in the HF applied side. One isolated lymphocele occurred at the left groin (2.7%) (tables n.2-3). A Fisher's exact test was conducted between EC and HF on the occurrence of wound healing complications (3/36 for EC and 1/36 for HF) that resulted statistically significant at p<0.05. Focus Harmonic Scalpel has certain advantages than conventional haemostasis in avoiding surgical access complications.