Operative Neurosurgery最新文献

Background and objectives: The percutaneous full-endoscopic C2 ganglionectomy (PEC2G), an innovative procedure developed for the surgical treatment of intractable occipital neuralgia, was firstly reported by us in 2021. However, a universally accepted and well-articulated protocol modality remains elusive. The primary objective of this anatomic investigation was to meticulously elucidate the standard procedural steps of PEC2G and assess the anatomic features supporting the safe implementation of PEC2G.

Methods: Eighteen fresh adult cadavers were incorporated into this study. From this sample, 3 cadavers were subjected to bilateral PEC2G. Each procedure was documented and assessed, leading to the formulation of standard procedure criteria for PEC2G. Subsequently, 10 sets of anatomic parameters pertinent to this procedure were identified, quantified, and analyzed in 15 cadavers after complete bilateral endoscopic exposure of the C2 ganglion. An assessment of the technical feasibility and potential constraints associated with PEC2G was conducted, providing invaluable insights into the procedure's anatomic considerations.

Results: All 3 cadavers successfully underwent the PEC2G without any observed complications, such as dura tears or vertebral artery injuries. The C2 inferior articular process emerged as the optimal bony target for puncture, with the C2 pedicle serving as the standard guiding landmark en route to the C2 ganglion. In the 15 cadavers subjected to the planned procedure, 10 sets of anatomic parameters were quantified, establishing a foundational understanding of the anatomy in the context of PEC2G procedure. The results demonstrated that the characteristic of anatomic data pertinent to surgical site supported the safe implementation of PEC2G.

Conclusion: This study contributes the standard surgical steps and crucial anatomic parameters relevant to PEC2G. The characteristic of anatomic data bolsters the safety credentials of this technique, which offers a reliable approach to achieve C2 ganglionectomy. These insights undeniably establish a robust foundation for the ongoing refinement and broader adoption of PEC2G.

Background and objectives: Identifying and characterizing sources of targeting error in stereotactic procedures is essential to maximizing accuracy, potentially improving surgical outcomes. We aim to describe a generic framework which characterizes sources of stereotactic inaccuracy.

Methods: We assembled a list of stereotactic systems: ROSA, Neuromate, Mazor Renaissance, ExcelsiusGPS, Cirq, STarFix (FHC), Nexframe, ClearPoint, CRW, and Leksell. We searched the literature for qualitative and quantitative work identifying and quantifying potential sources of inaccuracy and describing each system's implementation using Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines. Our literature search spanned 1969 to 2024, and various studies were included, with formats ranging from phantom studies to systematic reviews. Keyword searches were conducted, and the details about each system were used to create a framework for identifying and describing the unique targeting error profile of each system.

Results: We describe and illustrate the details of various sources of stereotactic inaccuracies and generate a framework to unify these sources into a single framework. This framework entails 5 domains: imaging, registration, mechanical accuracy, target planning and adjustment, and trajectory planning and adjustment. This framework was applied to 10 stereotactic systems.

Conclusion: This framework provides a rubric to analyze the sources of error for any stereotactic system. Illustrations allow the reader to understand sources of error conceptually so that they may apply them to their practice.

Background and objectives: McCarty keyhole (MCK) is the most important entry point during orbitocranial and cranio-orbital approaches; nevertheless, its anatomic coordinates have never been detailedly described from transorbital perspective. To provide the spatial coordinates for intraorbital projection of the "mirror" MCK by using the well-established main anatomic-surgical bony landmarks met along transorbital corridor.

Methods: MCK was identified in 15 adult dry skulls (30 sides) on exocranial surface of pterional region based on the well-defined external bony landmarks: on the frontosphenoid suture, 5 to 6 mm behind the joining point (JP) of frontozygomatic suture (FZS), frontosphenoid suture (FSS), and sphenozygomatic suture (SZS). A 1-mm burr hole was performed and progressively enlarged to identify the intracranial and intraorbital compartments. Exit site of the intraorbital part of burr hole was referenced to the FZS on the orbital rim, the superior orbital fissure, and the inferior orbital fissure and to the JP of FZS, FSS, and SZS. To electronically validate the results, 3-dimensional photorealistic and interactive models were reconstructed with photogrammetry. Finally, for a further validation, McCarty mirror keyhole was also exposed, based on results achieved, through endoscopic transorbital approach in 10 head specimens (20 sides).

Results: Intraorbital projection of MCK was identified on the FSS on intraorbital surface, 1.5 ± 0.5 mm posterior to JP, 11.5 ± 1.1 mm posterior to the FZS on orbital rim following the suture, 13.0 ± 1.2 mm from most anterior end of superior orbital fissure, 15.5 ± 1.4 mm from the most anterior end of the inferior orbital fissure in vertical line, on measurements under direct macroscopic visualization (mean ± SD). These values were electronically confirmed on the photogrammetric models with mean difference within 1 mm.

Conclusion: To be aware of exact position of intraorbital projection of MCK during an early stage of transorbital approaches provides several surgical, clinical, and aesthetic advantages.

Background and importance: Giant calcified thoracic discs are challenging surgical pathologies that tend to be more centrally located and calcified. This complicates the removal process and potentiates the formation of dural defects, resulting in persistent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks and the formation of pleural fistulas. The typical intervention for this is CSF diversion through external ventricular drain or lumbar drain placement, followed by direct repair. However, if all these measures fail, subsequent salvage techniques have not been described previously.

Clinical presentation: A 45-year-old man with past medical history of obesity (body mass index: 58), hypertension, and type 2 diabetes mellitus presented to the emergency department with thoracic myelopathy symptoms. MR demonstrated a giant calcified thoracic discs at T7-T8 with severe spinal cord compression. Intraoperatively, the disc was found fused to the dura and removal caused a large ventrolateral dural dehiscence. CSF diversion and direct repair were attempted unsuccessfully, so a salvage procedure with a rotational pedicled latissimus dorsi flap was performed. The patient's latissimus dorsi was exposed and resected from attachments, maintaining thoracodorsal blood supply, while removing thoracodorsal innervation. The flap was then rotated into the previous corpectomy site. The dural defect was repaired with a sealant patch, overlayed with a parietal pleural flap and the latissimus dorsi flap. By the patient's last follow-up, he had full functional independence at home.

Conclusion: We present a surgical case highlighting the challenges of managing postoperative CSF-pleural fistula occurring after giant calcified thoracic disc removal and the successful use of a novel rotational latissimus dorsi flap to definitively repair the fistula after unsuccessful primary interventions.

Background and objectives: Open thoracic diskectomy often requires significant bone resection and fusion, whereas an endoscopic thoracic diskectomy offers a less invasive alternative. Therefore, we sought to compare one-level open vs endoscopic thoracic diskectomy regarding (1) perioperative outcomes, (2) neurological recovery, and (3) total cost.

Methods: A single-center, retrospective, cohort study using prospectively collected data of patients undergoing one-level thoracic diskectomy was undertaken from 2018 to 2023. The primary exposure variable was open vs endoscopic. The primary outcome was perioperative outcomes and neurological recovery. Secondary outcomes were total cost of care. Multivariable regression analysis controlled for age, body mass index, sex, symptom onset, disk characteristics, operative time, and length of stay.

Results: Of 29 patients undergoing thoracic diskectomy, 17 were open and 12 were endoscopic. Preoperative demographics, symptoms, and radiographic findings were comparable between the cohorts. Perioperatively , open surgery had significantly higher mean length of stay (4.9 ± 1.5 vs 0.0 ± 0.0 days, P < .001), median (IQR) longer operative time (342.8 [68.4] vs 141.5 [36] minutes, P < .001), and more blood loss (350 [390] vs 6.5 [20] mL; P < .001). 16 (94%) open patients required fusion vs 0 endoscopic ( P < .001). Postoperative opioid use ( P = .119), readmission ( P = .665), reoperation ( P = .553), and rate of neurological improvement ( P > .999) were similar between the 2 groups. Financially, open surgical median costs were 7x higher than endoscopic ($59 792 [$16 118] vs $8128 [$1848]; P < .001), driven by length of stay (β = $2261/night, P < .001), open surgery (β = $24 106, P < .001), and number of pedicle screws (β = $1829/screw, P = .002) on multivariable analysis. On sensitivity analysis, open surgery was never cost-efficient against endoscopic surgery and excess endoscopic revision rates of 86% above open revision rates were required for break-even costs between the surgical approaches.

Conclusion: Endoscopic thoracic diskectomy was associated with decreased length of stay, operative time, blood loss, and total cost compared with the open approach, with similar neurological outcomes. These findings may help patients and surgeons seek endoscopic approach as a less morbid and less costly alternative.